[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Michael Schmarck
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote: >> Well, I disagree. I want to install almost all of the KDE stuff, >> but eg. not the PPP things, as I've got not use for that on that >> system. But I still would like my world file *NOT* to be cluttered

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:39:11 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: > > emerge --depclean > > thanks. 200 some packages, which would be removed. Quite a > lot. If you've removed kde-meta, I'm not surprised. > After removing stuff, a revdep-rebuild should be done, shouldn't > it? It won't hurt, alth

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Anthony Metcalf
Michael Schmarck wrote: Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote: Connected question: How do I quickly find all the packages that got installed as a dependency, but which are no longer needed, because the dependent package got removed (a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread KH
Hi, I use following approach: emerge --sync emerge -DuavN world dispatch-conf emerge --depclean -pv revdep-rebuild glsa-check -t all Whenever there is something changed on the way, I will start with the world command again. Sometimes depclean will remove something world will emerge again. I wa

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:01:31 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: > > But that's exactly what it's for "merge this to pull in all > > non-developer, split kde-base/* packages". > > Not all -meta packages behave like that - eg. the gst-plugins-meta > package only pulls in, what's wanted (per USE flags

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Problems with GRUB in the installation of Gentoo

2006-02-16 Thread Holly Bostick
Mick schreef: > John Jolet wrote: >> >> On 2/16/06 11:05 AM, "Michael Kintzios" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> make install does exactly the same, and sets up the vmlinuz >> and vmlinuz.old symlinks to point to your new and pr

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Problems with GRUB in the installation of Gentoo

2006-02-16 Thread Mick
Holly Bostick wrote: > But any utility ported from Debian certainly can't be considered a hack > by any stretch of the imagination > > Holly It seems that my previous message crossed in the post with this one and the one from Neil. I didn't know of the make install command, but thanks to your p

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Problems with GRUB in the installation of Gentoo

2006-02-16 Thread John Jolet
> > I am confused: how many 'make install's are there? Don't they 'all' do the > same? Are we talking about a customised (hacked) make install here? Install is a target to make. Install_modules is a target to make. What's confusing? Make is a command. Install or install_modules, or install_

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Problems with GRUB in the installation of Gentoo

2006-02-16 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:33:15 +0100, Holly Bostick wrote: > This functionality is not in any way a hack: > > equery belongs /sbin/installkernel > [ Searching for file(s) /sbin/installkernel in *... ] > sys-apps/debianutils-2.15 (/sbin/installkernel) > > Programs That Depend On debianutils > app-a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Problems with GRUB in the installation of Gentoo

2006-02-17 Thread Holly Bostick
Neil Bothwick schreef: > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:33:15 +0100, Holly Bostick wrote: > >> This functionality is not in any way a hack: >> >> equery belongs /sbin/installkernel [ Searching for file(s) >> /sbin/installkernel in *... ] sys-apps/debianutils-2.15 >> (/sbin/installkernel) > > > It's p

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Problems with GRUB in the installation of Gentoo

2006-02-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:45:39 +0100, Holly Bostick wrote: > Is there another way to get a list of packages that comprise the system > profile (other than just trying to unmerge one and getting a warning)? You could look at the packages files in the directory linked to by /etc/make.profile and its

RE: [gentoo-user] RE: Re: Gnome: Switching windows backward using the window list

2007-04-04 Thread Wayne Oliver
> -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Skwar > Sent: 04 April 2007 12:36 > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] RE: Re: Gnome: Switching windows backward using the > window list > > Wayne Oliver &

[gentoo-user] RE: RE: Re: Gnome: Switching windows backward using the window list

2007-04-04 Thread Alexander Skwar
Wayne Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's one that may sound silly but... :) > Are you sure your shift key works? i.e. do other key combinations with > the shift key work? YES IT DOES :-) Sorry for shouting... *g* Alexander Skwar -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Why are gentoo people so in love with colorizedoutput?!?

2007-04-05 Thread Alexander Skwar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 09:40:21PM +0200, Harm Geerts wrote: >> try to unset the FETCHCOMMAND in your /etc/make.conf > > That does eliminate the color output, So your rant was without substance, after all? > to disable getdelta. If the portage de

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Why are gentoo people so in love with colorizedoutput?!?

2007-04-05 Thread Alexander Skwar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:27:48PM +0200, Harm Geerts wrote: > >> Would you please show a little respect to the people who developed >> the software you use every day. > > I have found that people are fine, it is groups of people who cause > the pro

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-17 Thread Mick
On Sunday 17 September 2006 13:43, Alexander Skwar wrote: > · Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sunday 17 September 2006 09:21, Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> > > It makes very little sense to ditch the unix norm of setting a > >> > > system

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-17 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On 9/17/06, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday 17 September 2006 13:43, Alexander Skwar wrote: > · Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sunday 17 September 2006 09:21, Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> > > It makes very little sense to di

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-17 Thread Timothy A. Holmes
> > >> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > >> > > It makes very little sense to ditch the unix norm of setting a > > >> > > systemwide domain name in favor of doing it per interface! > > >> > > > >> > True. And that's probably why you don't *have* to set it per > > >> > i

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Kevin O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 9/17/06, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sunday 17 September 2006 13:43, Alexander Skwar wrote: >> > · Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > > On Sunday 17 September 2006 09:21, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> > >> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwa

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-17 Thread Richard Fish
On 9/17/06, Timothy A. Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am not sure if this is related or not, but for some reason, my resolv.conf keeps getting modified, causing samba to fail. I open it and all that is in there is the domain, no name servers. The reason is noted in net.example: # Setting

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Thomas T. Veldhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Mick wrote: >> I saw this: # dns_domain_eth0="your.domain" in the /etc/conf.d/net.example >> and >> added: dns_domain="STUDY" >> >> but still .none comes up: >> >> # domainname >> (none) >> >> > Indeed ... it is NOT set to work properly for the way

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-17 Thread Ryan Tandy
Mick wrote: I saw this: # dns_domain_eth0="your.domain" in the /etc/conf.d/net.example and added: dns_domain="STUDY" but still .none comes up: # domainname (none) the command should be: dnsdomainname (or hostname -d) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-18 Thread Sigi Schwartz
Hi. Ryan Tandy wrote: > the command should be: dnsdomainname (or hostname -d) Now, I have a question to that: How or when do new settings apply? Even though I use DHCP I understand that one can override the results from that. For testing purposes I'd like to use that. But I can change the setting

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-18 Thread Ryan Tandy
Sigi Schwartz wrote: So, how do I make new (testing-)settings apply without reboot? /etc/init.d/net.eth0 restart and wait a few seconds for your resolv.conf to be updated. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Should we NEVER do an ``emerge -u world''?

2006-09-29 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:41:22 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > That's not the same as -5ing everything, which is what I was > > referring to and the easy way to toast /etc/fstab. > > Ah, okay, then I did not understand you completely right. Probably because I didn't explain myself very clearly

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: OT: How to check for an existing ethernet link ?

2006-10-01 Thread Mick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Meino Christian Cramer wrote: > But in my case I have to avoid *ANY* timeouts (wayting for an answer > or another timeout for example: the timeout of "gethostbyname()") if > possible. My program has to react AS FAST AS POSSIBLE on error > conditions.

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Evolution icons missing under KDE but nut under Gnome

2006-06-12 Thread Peter
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 19:44:37 -0700, Richard Fish wrote: > On 6/10/06, Keith Kastorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Run the gnome-settings-daemon...it will fix it, and you'll see your >> Gnome theming under KDE too. > > Keith, thanks for the pointer. > > > WTF! Now I have to pull in a bunch

Multiboot Live USB creatores - Was: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Kaspersky Rescue Disk

2013-02-13 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2013-02-13 4:20 AM, Michael Sondow wrote: Yes, there seem to be a number of programs that will create a bootable USB flash drive from a linux distro ISO, and also from some of the rescue disk ISOs. Some of these utlities create "persistence", but I'm not sure what that means: just save data s

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Fresh install and problem with net.* init.d script

2013-07-24 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 24/07/2013 22:18, Steven J. Long wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: >> Peace and hugz OK? > > Definitely :-) > > "POSIX 4: Programming for the Real World" (Gallmeister, 1995) > "UNIX Network Programming vol 2: Interprocess Communications" (Stevens, 1999) > > iirc the first is on safari-online; you

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01

2013-10-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:27:59 +0100, Steven J. Long wrote: > > I don't understand why people keep banging on about Poettering in > > this, previously finished, thread. > > You brought up the background, wrt Greg K-H. Regardless of how you > feel, I'm not alone in considering Poettering's (and Se

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01

2013-10-11 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Friday 11 Oct 2013 12:55:55 Neil Bothwick wrote: > While I'm loathe to use words like underhanded, ... Not "loathe" here but "loath" or even "loth". (Just to help non-native speakers avoid confusion, you understand.) :-) -- Regards, Peter

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01

2013-10-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:11:55 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > While I'm loathe to use words like underhanded, ... > > > Not "loathe" here but "loath" or even "loth". > Ouch! -- Neil Bothwick Mac screen message: "Like, dude, something went wrong." signature.asc Description: PGP si

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: latest eix versions messes with my screen status bar

2012-03-20 Thread Paul Hartman
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2012.03.20 at 12:09 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf >> wrote: >> > On 2012.03.20 at 10:14 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Following a recent eix version update, a

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there

2011-09-05 Thread walt
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 17:14 +0200, Lars Madson wrote: > Yes I have only one ethernet adapter, eth0. > My /etc/init.d/net.eth1 is a symlink to net.lo > I can remove it. > But shouldn't it be a /etc/init.d/net.eth0 ? Yes, net.eth0 should also be a symlink to net.lo. If you don't have that symlink t

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: [Gentoo-User] emerge --sync likely to kill SSD?

2014-06-22 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Kai Krakow wrote: > I don't see where you could lose the volume management features. You just > add device on top of the bcache device after you initialized the raw device > with a bcache superblock and attached it. The rest works the same, just that > you use bcac

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: [Gentoo-User] emerge --sync likely to kill SSD?

2014-06-24 Thread Kai Krakow
Rich Freeman schrieb: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Kai Krakow wrote: >> I don't see where you could lose the volume management features. You just >> add device on top of the bcache device after you initialized the raw >> device with a bcache superblock and attached it. The rest works the s

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Still not getting how to influence compile flags with emerge

2005-12-02 Thread Mick
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:25:07 - "Michael Kintzios" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > Which USE flag will make that +xterm_clipboard > | > | This is a dependency flag which I guess can be flipped by first > | emerging x11-apps/xclipboard. > > Er. No. Go on, tell us mo

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote: > Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:39:11 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: > >> > emerge --depclean > >> > >> thanks. 200 some packages, which would be removed. Quite a > >> lot. > > > > If you've removed kde-meta, I'

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Michael Schmarck
KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe he does have multiple versions installed of those packages. What For gcc: Yes. It's about time to dump gcc-3.4.6. > is the output of for example: > emerge -avP gcc > ? $ emerge -avP gcc superuser access is required... adding --pretend to options. Calculat

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread KH
Maybe he does have multiple versions installed of those packages. What is the output of for example: emerge -avP gcc ? KH Alan McKinnon wrote: On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote: Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:39:11 +0200, Michael Schmar

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:20:21 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: > Which majorly sucks, as there are good reasons why the packages > should NOT be the way they are right now. Such as? Hint: uncluttering the world file is not a reason for changing the ebuilds, lthough it is a good reason for a more fr

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Michael Schmarck
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:20:21 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: > >> Which majorly sucks, as there are good reasons why the packages >> should NOT be the way they are right now. > > Such as? Finer control, without cluttering the world file. > Hint: unclut

RE: [gentoo-user] RE: RE: Re: Gnome: Switching windows backward using the window list

2007-04-04 Thread Wayne Oliver
> -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Skwar > Sent: 04 April 2007 03:18 > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] RE: RE: Re: Gnome: Switching windows backward using > the window list > > Wayne Oliver &

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-17 Thread Etaoin Shrdlu
On Sunday 17 September 2006 18:59, Alexander Skwar wrote: > I've got: > > # Alle Interfaces > modules=( "ifconfig" ) > dns_servers="130.171.200.151 130.171.157.129" > dns_search="dewup.europe europe" > dns_domain="dewup.europe" > ntp_servers="130.171.200.145 130.171.200.144" > nis_domain="wup.de"

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Etaoin Shrdlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sunday 17 September 2006 18:59, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> I've got: >> >> # Alle Interfaces >> modules=( "ifconfig" ) >> dns_servers="130.171.200.151 130.171.157.129" >> dns_search="dewup.europe europe" >> dns_domain="dewup.europe" >> ntp_servers="130.1

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-17 Thread Drew
Following all instructions results in the console login prompt looking something like this: Linux version(hostname.unknown_domain) Which looks ludicrous ... it is also expecting domainname [or API equivalent] to return something other than "none". Tom Veldhouse I don't know if this helps but

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-18 Thread Mick
On Sunday 17 September 2006 20:02, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Well... But what Mick showed was the expected behaviour. He > has NOT set a domainname - at least not the domainname that > the "domainname" command would return. I just can't get it. :-( When I logon I can see in the console: "This i

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-18 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:47:03 +0100, Mick wrote: > When I logon I can see in the console: > > "This is lappy.(none) (Linux i686 2.6.7-gentoo-r8) 13.31.51" > > Where is this "(none)" being read from? As in which files and which > particular entry in that file? /etc/issue sets the login output.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-18 Thread Mick
On Monday 18 September 2006 14:17, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:47:03 +0100, Mick wrote: > > When I logon I can see in the console: > > > > "This is lappy.(none) (Linux i686 2.6.7-gentoo-r8) 13.31.51" > > > > Where is this "(none)" being read from? As in which files and which > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:12:13 +0100, Mick wrote: > > /etc/issue sets the login output. A \o in there is replaced by the NIS > > domain, \O by the DNS domain. > > # cat /etc/issue > This is \n.\O (\s \m \r) \t > > So, it should read my DNS domain name. But it doesn't. > > > > Unlike Alex's ear

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-19 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
Neil Bothwick wrote: Have you set the dns_domain in conf.d/net? I have tried this and it does NOT work.  I'm afraid it gives nothing! It sounds like dns_domain is not set. Considering that I have tried it ... I know it not to work, so I have little doubt tha

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-19 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 13:51, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > Have you set the dns_domain in conf.d/net? > > I have tried this and it does NOT work. Yes, I have made several attempts to set it up in the /etc/conf.d/net, inc.: dns_domain="STUDY" dns_domain_lo="STUDY" dn

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-24 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 13:51, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > Have you set the dns_domain in conf.d/net? > > I have tried this and it does NOT work. > > >> I'm afraid it gives nothing! > > > > It sounds like dns_domain is not set. > > Considering that I have tried it ...

Re: Multiboot Live USB creatores - Was: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Kaspersky Rescue Disk

2013-02-13 Thread Robert Walker
On 13/02/13 11:55, Tanstaafl wrote: On 2013-02-13 4:20 AM, Michael Sondow wrote: Yes, there seem to be a number of programs that will create a bootable USB flash drive from a linux distro ISO, and also from some of the rescue disk ISOs. Some of these utlities create "persistence", but I'm not

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there

2011-09-06 Thread Lars Madson
SOLVED. I deleted the /etc/init.d/net.eth1 and created a symlink for /etc/init.d/net.eth0 to net.lo, without reboot. Thank you! Laurent 2011/9/5 walt > On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 17:14 +0200, Lars Madson wrote: > > Yes I have only one ethernet adapter, eth0. > > My /etc/init.d/net.eth1 is a symlink

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there

2011-09-06 Thread Dale
Lars Madson wrote: SOLVED. I deleted the /etc/init.d/net.eth1 and created a symlink for /etc/init.d/net.eth0 to net.lo, without reboot. Thank you! Laurent Have you restarted your network? Just deleting the file isn't going to stop/start anything. It will still be running the old way until

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Notice: possible past, present and future breakage related to .la files

2010-10-02 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno sab, 02/10/2010 alle 09.56 -0500, Dale ha scritto: > > Still on topic but I have a question and you are in the know on > this. > I'm running unstable portage, 2.2_rc67 to be exact. Does this new a > version of portage take care of this already? It sounds like it is > the > stable p

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: [Gentoo-User] emerge --sync likely to kill SSD?

2014-06-24 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > I'm not sure if multiple partitions can share the same cache device > partition but more or less that's it: Initialize bcache, then attach your > backing devices, then add those bcache devices to your btrfs. Ah, if you are stuck with one bcache

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Still not getting how to influence compile flags with emerge

2005-12-02 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 19:55:47 + Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:25:07 - "Michael Kintzios" | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | > Which USE flag will make that +xterm_clipboard | > | | > | This is a dependency flag which I guess can be flip

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Still not getting how to influence compile flags with emerge

2005-12-02 Thread Mick
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 19:55:47 + Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | > On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:25:07 - "Michael Kintzios" > | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > | > Which USE flag will make that +xterm_clipboard > | > | > | > | This is a d

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote: > > Maybe he does have multiple versions installed of those packages. > > What > > For gcc: Yes. It's about time to dump gcc-3.4.6. Yes, I see now. --depclean is removing old SLOTS and the original output is either very unverbose, or has been trim

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Dale
Michael Schmarck wrote: KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Maybe he does have multiple versions installed of those packages. What For gcc: Yes. It's about time to dump gcc-3.4.6. is the output of for example: emerge -avP gcc ? $ emerge -avP gcc superuser access is required... a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Anthony Metcalf
Dale wrote: It's been a while but make sure you have switched to the new gcc and it is working fine before removing the old one. Nothing worse than removing gcc then finding out the new one isn't . . . functional. Sort of fun to fix. Dale :-) :-) Tell me about it! Hint: Don't then un

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Michael Schmarck
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote: >> > Maybe he does have multiple versions installed of those packages. >> > What >> >> For gcc: Yes. It's about time to dump gcc-3.4.6. > > Yes, I see now. --depclean is removing old SLOTS and the origina

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:08:42 -0500, Dale wrote: > It's been a while but make sure you have switched to the new gcc and it > is working fine before removing the old one. Nothing worse than > removing gcc then finding out the new one isn't . . . functional. Sort > of fun to fix. NEVER unmerge

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Dale
Anthony Metcalf wrote: Dale wrote: It's been a while but make sure you have switched to the new gcc and it is working fine before removing the old one. Nothing worse than removing gcc then finding out the new one isn't . . . functional. Sort of fun to fix. Dale :-) :-) Tell me about

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:08:42 -0500, Dale wrote: > > It's been a while but make sure you have switched to the new gcc > > and it is working fine before removing the old one. Nothing worse > > than removing gcc then finding out the new one isn't . . .

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Dale
Michael Schmarck wrote: Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:20:21 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: Which majorly sucks, as there are good reasons why the packages should NOT be the way they are right now. Such as? Finer control, without clutter

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:42:51 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > NEVER unmerge a system package without building a binary package > > first. > > Tut, tut. Neil, where's the fun in that? The fun is in learning the rule in the first place. It's like making backups, no one does it because someone else

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:36:45 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: > >> Which majorly sucks, as there are good reasons why the packages > >> should NOT be the way they are right now. > > > > Such as? > > Finer control, without cluttering the world file. What could be finer than picking which packa

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Michael Schmarck
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:36:45 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: > >> >> Which majorly sucks, as there are good reasons why the packages >> >> should NOT be the way they are right now. >> > >> > Such as? >> >> Finer control, without cluttering the world fil

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote: > Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:20:21 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: > >> Which majorly sucks, as there are good reasons why the packages > >> should NOT be the way they are right now. > > > > Such as? > > Finer

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: ssh-add: Could not open a connection to your authentication agent.

2008-04-16 Thread Michael Schmarck
Hello. · Eric Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ok, so looking at your original post, gvfs, gnome-vfs, and seahorse were > upgraded. Yes. > I'm not much of a gnome guy but I do know that apps do all > sorts of strange stuff if I upgrade deps and don't restart them > (forget). When's the last time

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Notice: possible past, present and future breakage related to .la files

2010-10-02 Thread Dale
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il giorno sab, 02/10/2010 alle 09.56 -0500, Dale ha scritto: Still on topic but I have a question and you are in the know on this. I'm running unstable portage, 2.2_rc67 to be exact. Does this new a version of portage take care of this already? It sounds like it i

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Still not getting how to influence compile flags with emerge

2005-12-02 Thread Holly Bostick
Mick schreef: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > >> On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 19:55:47 + Mick >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > >> On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:25:07 - "Michael Kintzios" | > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | > Which USE flag will >> make that +xterm_clipboard

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Gnome: No sound - "No volume control GStreamer plugins and/or devices found"

2008-03-26 Thread Michael Schmarck
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps you could file a feature request at b.g.o. to get the old > behaviour back. It seems entirely reasonable to me that rhythmbox > should DEPENDs on gst-plugins-base which should conditionally DEPEND > on -alsa or -oss (or other sound systems). Isn'

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:27:59 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: > It really depends on, from what side you're coming. If you want > just a few packages, then all is well with the current approach. > > If you, however, want everything but a few packages, then the > current approach isn't so fine anymo

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages

2008-04-08 Thread Michael Schmarck
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:27:59 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: > >> It really depends on, from what side you're coming. If you want >> just a few packages, then all is well with the current approach. >> >> If you, however, want everything but a few package

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: ssh-add: Could not open a connection to your authentication agent.

2008-04-16 Thread Eric Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Schmarck wrote: | Hello. | | · Eric Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | |> Ok, so looking at your original post, gvfs, gnome-vfs, and seahorse were |> upgraded. | | Yes. | |> I'm not much of a gnome guy but I do know that apps do all |> sorts of str

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: SMTP on Kmail-4.14.10 does not work without kde-apps/kwalletd-16.04.3-r1

2017-06-08 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Mick, Mick wrote: > On Thursday 08 Jun 2017 02:04:44 Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Mick wrote: >> > On Tuesday 06 Jun 2017 16:35:40 you wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> I've updated a number of kde (plasma) packages, including kde- >> >> frameworks/kwallet-5.34.0-r1. A depclean action wanted to re

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Gnome: No sound - "No volume control GStreamer plugins and/or devices found"

2008-03-26 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote: > Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps you could file a feature request at b.g.o. to get the old > > behaviour back. It seems entirely reasonable to me that rhythmbox > > should DEPENDs on gst-plugins-base which should conditionall

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Gnome: No sound - "No volume control GStreamer plugins and/or devices found"

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Schmarck
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote: >> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Perhaps you could file a feature request at b.g.o. to get the old >> > behaviour back. It seems entirely reasonable to me that rhythmbox >> > should DEPEN

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: tar a brand new Gentoo install to a USB drive for safe keeping?

2008-05-08 Thread Michael Schmarck
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 06 May 2008 14:40:08 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: > >> > That hasn't been needed for a long time. Tar is able to detect bzip2 >> > and gzip compression and handle it automatically. >> >> That's only true for GNU tar. If you're also dealing wit

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: SMTP on Kmail-4.14.10 does not work without kde-apps/kwalletd-16.04.3-r1

2017-06-08 Thread Mick
On Thursday 08 Jun 2017 13:21:56 Jörg Schaible wrote: > > Yes, this seems to be the problem. Starting Kmail does not launch > > kwalletd5 and as a consequence kmail starts asking for each email account > > password separately. > > > > I guess until kmail:5 is installed I will have to start kwallet

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: SMTP on Kmail-4.14.10 does not work without kde-apps/kwalletd-16.04.3-r1

2017-06-08 Thread Jörg Schaible
Mick wrote: > On Thursday 08 Jun 2017 13:21:56 Jörg Schaible wrote: >> > Yes, this seems to be the problem. Starting Kmail does not launch >> > kwalletd5 and as a consequence kmail starts asking for each email >> > account password separately. >> > >> > I guess until kmail:5 is installed I will h

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Problems rebuilding gtk+ (and many other packages), due to not found /usr/lib/libXCBRenderUtil.la

2007-03-05 Thread Alexander Skwar
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > None of those seem particularly relevant ('cept /maybe/ cairo), but I > figured I'd give you the whole list so you can go searching if xcb-util > isn't the culprit. Thx for the whole list. I've since rebuild cairo, libX11 and a bunch of other pack

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: [gentoo-user] 回复: [gentoo-user] How to show Chinese or write Chinese on console ?

2011-11-06 Thread Blackdream W
We called "飞天豹补丁” 在 2011年11月7日 下午2:27,Lavender 写道: > 在 2011-11-07 13:10:16,microcai 写道: > > > > >show 可以,有内核级别的中文补丁。 > > > >要 write 的话可以使用 zhcon 或者 fbterm 配合 ibus-fbterm > > > 其实我只要show就可以了,补丁叫啥名字,是不是直接安装就行了? > PS:原来这里还有Chinese啊,平时都不见冒泡。 > > > -- *Ben.Wong*

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: SMTP on Kmail-4.14.10 does not work without kde-apps/kwalletd-16.04.3-r1

2017-06-08 Thread Mick
On Thursday 08 Jun 2017 16:56:21 Jörg Schaible wrote: > Mick wrote: > > On Thursday 08 Jun 2017 13:21:56 Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> > Yes, this seems to be the problem. Starting Kmail does not launch > >> > kwalletd5 and as a consequence kmail starts asking for each email > >> > account password se

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: SMTP on Kmail-4.14.10 does not work without kde-apps/kwalletd-16.04.3-r1

2017-06-08 Thread Jörg Schaible
Mick wrote: > On Thursday 08 Jun 2017 16:56:21 Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Mick wrote: >> > On Thursday 08 Jun 2017 13:21:56 Jörg Schaible wrote: >> >> > Yes, this seems to be the problem. Starting Kmail does not launch >> >> > kwalletd5 and as a consequence kmail starts asking for each email >> >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: [gentoo-user] 回复: [gentoo-user] How to show Chinese or write Chinese on console ?

2011-11-07 Thread microcai
On 2011年11月07日 15:37, Blackdream W wrote: > We called "飞天豹补丁” :) 这家伙比较忙, 用到新内核上可能需要费点功夫。我是个闲人,我修改过补丁 会及时跟进最新的内核的。 ^_^ repo.or.cz/w/linux-2.6/cjktty.git > > 在 2011年11月7日 下午2:27,Lavender 写道: > >> 在 2011-11-07 13:10:16,microcai 写道: >> >>> >>> show 可以,有内核级别的中文补丁。 >>> >>> 要 write 的话可以使用 zhcon 或者

Re:[gentoo-user] Re: Re: [gentoo-user] 回复: [gentoo-user] How to show Chinese or write Chinese on console ?

2011-11-07 Thread Lavender
Where can I get it ? I think it might have a English name cause I didn't find it when I used name "飞天豹补丁" :-) Also how to use it ? Directly install or build into kernel ? 在 2011-11-07 15:37:41,"Blackdream W" 写道: We called "飞天豹补丁”

Re:Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: [gentoo-user] 回复: [gentoo-user] How to show Chinese or write Chinese on console ?

2011-11-07 Thread Lavender
>:) 这家伙比较忙, 用到新内核上可能需要费点功夫。我是个闲人,我修改过补丁 >会及时跟进最新的内核的。 ^_^ > >repo.or.cz/w/linux-2.6/cjktty.git > Er , I'm not very clear about what you said. These stuffs in the webpage that you gave, which should be picked and how to use ?

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re:[gentoo-user] 回复: [gentoo-user] How to show Chinese or write Chinese on console ?

2011-11-07 Thread microcai
merge the utf8 branch , enable CJK font , recompile your kernel. enjoy it. 在 2011年11月7日 下午9:48,Lavender 写道: > I have created file named "00locale" in directory /etc/env.d/ > The content of "00locale" is like below: > LANG="zh_CN.UTF-8" > LC_CTYPE="zh_CN.UTF-8" > the rest variables are all "en_U

Re:[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re:[gentoo-user] 回复: [gentoo-user] How to show Chinese or write Chinese on console ?

2011-11-07 Thread Lavender
在 2011-11-07 22:28:34,microcai 写道: >merge the utf8 branch , enable CJK font , recompile your kernel. enjoy it. > Thank you very much !

[gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re:[gentoo-user] 回复: [gentoo-user] How to show Chinese or write Chinese on console ?

2011-11-07 Thread Blackdream W
i appreciate you doing this for Chinese user. 2011/11/7 microcai > merge the utf8 branch , enable CJK font , recompile your kernel. enjoy it. > > > 在 2011年11月7日 下午9:48,Lavender 写道: > > I have created file named "00locale" in directory /etc/env.d/ > > The content of "00locale" is like below: >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6