Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-07-02 Thread maxim wexler
> K8N-E. It says: > > way too damn slow for Tell me about it! Pages don't open or give errors or lead to a rabbit warren of irrelevant links. English often incomprehensible. No more Asus products for this buckaroo! > > It said that LBA mode will be disabled if the disk > was "formatted" > with

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-07-02 Thread maxim wexler
> K8N-E. It says: > > way too damn slow for Tell me about it! Pages don't open or give errors or lead to a rabbit warren of irrelevant links. English often incomprehensible. No more Asus products for this buckaroo! > > It said that LBA mode will be disabled if the disk > was "formatted" > with

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-07-02 Thread James Hiscock
> PartitionMagic is the best for this, but at $70 it is a bit pricey. > There may be free programs to do this, but I have no experience with them. QTparted: open-source alternative to PQMagic, _and_ it's significantly faster (e.g. resizing a 40GB NTFS partition to 10GB with PQMagic took me an hour

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-29 Thread maxim wexler
> that before jumping on people trying to help. > Smart Alec! "Help" my eye! __ Yahoo! Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-29 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >>Maxim, if you want the system to boot from the hard >>disk, I really think >>you have no choice but to repartition and re-install >>the system, with >>boot as the first partition. >> >> > >On the Sempron there are two HDs, the 120G, pri-mast >and a 3.5G(fat32) as a pri-

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-29 Thread A. Khattri
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, maxim wexler wrote: > > I imagine any CD included with a motherboard is old > > before it hits the > > shelves... > > So what? The "tool" will still work. Kindly read what > I wrote! I *did* read what you wrote. My point was if there was an update on the CD it would be old.

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-29 Thread maxim wexler
--- "A. Khattri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, maxim wexler wrote: > > > So there must be a problem w/ > > the Asus K8N-E(Sempron box) BIOS. I updated it > using > > the tool that came w/ the support CD but it only > made > > matters worse: > > Did you download the latest B

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-28 Thread A. Khattri
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, maxim wexler wrote: > Now, the Asus brd does have raid capability. Would > that be a way out of this morass? Its probably software RAID - you're better off using Linux's own software RAID. > How does raid work? http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO.html -- -- g

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-28 Thread A. Khattri
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, maxim wexler wrote: > So there must be a problem w/ > the Asus K8N-E(Sempron box) BIOS. I updated it using > the tool that came w/ the support CD but it only made > matters worse: Did you download the latest BIOS from Asus's site and use that? I imagine any CD included with a

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-26 Thread maxim wexler
> > Maxim, if you want the system to boot from the hard > disk, I really think > you have no choice but to repartition and re-install > the system, with > boot as the first partition. On the Sempron there are two HDs, the 120G, pri-mast and a 3.5G(fat32) as a pri-slave. LBA is set to auto in the

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-25 Thread Richard Fish
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > Richard Fish wrote: > >> No, it can understand reiserfs and xfs filesystems just fine. > > > Actually, grub does have an issue with reiserfs. True, I had forgotten about that. Thanks for the correction. > As already mentioned, using reiserfs on boot is a compl

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-25 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
Richard Fish wrote: A. Khattri wrote: On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, maxim wexler wrote: I tried to mkreiserfs /dev/hda2, the boot partition, My guess is that grub only understands ext2 file-systems so can't work with your boot partition. No, it can understand reiserfs and xfs filesystems just fine.

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-25 Thread maxim wexler
> By diverse means, we arrive at the same end. > > Holly Thanks, Holly. I remember thinking your suggestion too drastic to contemplate. Starting to look more reasonable now :o -mw Yahoo! Sports Rekindle the Rivalries. Si

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-25 Thread Richard Fish
A. Khattri wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, maxim wexler wrote: > >> This reminds me. When I installed 2005.0(sempron-box) >> I tried to mkreiserfs /dev/hda2, the boot partition, >> since that gave no problem in 2004.3(k6-box)but it >> gave me some sort of error, forget which, so I went >> for the de

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-25 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:30:19 -0400 (EDT), A. Khattri wrote: > You should leave /boot as an ext2 partition. My guess is that grub only > understands ext2 file-systems so can't work with your boot partition. GRUB does understand ReiserFS, although it is a complete waste of space using Reiser on a /

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-24 Thread Holly Bostick
maxim wexler schreef: >>Error 17 >> >>Installing to /dev/hda2, the gentoo boot part, gave >>same result >> >>Well, at least now it gives me an error num. > > > ...answering himself > > 17 : Cannot mount selected partition > This error is returned if the partition requested > exists, but the fil

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-24 Thread A. Khattri
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, maxim wexler wrote: > This reminds me. When I installed 2005.0(sempron-box) > I tried to mkreiserfs /dev/hda2, the boot partition, > since that gave no problem in 2004.3(k6-box)but it > gave me some sort of error, forget which, so I went > for the default, or anyways, the sugg

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-24 Thread Mark Knecht
On 6/24/05, maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Error 17 > > > > Installing to /dev/hda2, the gentoo boot part, gave > > same result > > > > Well, at least now it gives me an error num. > > ...answering himself > > 17 : Cannot mount selected partition > This error is returned if the parti

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-24 Thread maxim wexler
> Error 17 > > Installing to /dev/hda2, the gentoo boot part, gave > same result > > Well, at least now it gives me an error num. ...answering himself 17 : Cannot mount selected partition This error is returned if the partition requested exists, but the filesystem type cannot be recognized by

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-24 Thread maxim wexler
> > -- it *is* set to [auto] in the BIOS? BTW, HD is > Maybe if you turn on LBA it will help. It says here > that grub can access the full disk with LBA: see above. In the BIOS there are two choices, auto and disabled. If there's another way to turn LBA on, I'm all ears! > > You might need

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-24 Thread maxim wexler
> > Yep. Can you force LBA on? Used grub-install --force-lba /dev/hda. After a bunch of fd0 I/O errors(?) it said everything was fine, no errors found. Then I rebooted, got: GRUB Loading stage1.5 GRUB loading, please wait... Error 17 Installing to /dev/hda2, the gentoo boot part, gave same re

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-24 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >grub> configfile (hd0,1)/grub/grub.conf # /dev/hda2 > >Error 18: Selected cylinder exceeds maximum supported >by BIOS > >has this anything to do with LBA being "off" in POST >-- it *is* set to [auto] in the BIOS? BTW, HD is >listed in POST screen thus: > >Pri Master: Maxtor 4

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-24 Thread Zac Medico
maxim wexler wrote: > Went through the "saved" pile and found this: > > >>Try 1 (should bring up the boot menu): >>grub> configfile (hd0,3)/grub/grub.conf > > > grub> configfile (hd0,1)/grub/grub.conf # /dev/hda2 > > Error 18: Selected cylinder exceeds maximum supported > by BIOS > > has thi

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke--update

2005-06-24 Thread maxim wexler
Went through the "saved" pile and found this: > Try 1 (should bring up the boot menu): > grub> configfile (hd0,3)/grub/grub.conf grub> configfile (hd0,1)/grub/grub.conf # /dev/hda2 Error 18: Selected cylinder exceeds maximum supported by BIOS has this anything to do with LBA being "off" in POS

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-19 Thread maxim wexler
> So it look like we have to go back to trying to get > the CD booting to > work. Copy the /lib/grub/i386-pc/stage2_eltorito to > the boot/grub > directory on the ISO image, re-run the mkisofs > command we used before, > and burn the resulting ISO to a CD. Before that. I used emerge --buildpkgonl

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-19 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >> Or maybe the selected shell didn't initialize, >> including grub's if this >> is at that point? > > > Then I realised the one word GRUB appearing in upper > left corner of the screen is just a truncated version > of the above. Ah, ok, I see now. It looks like the stage1

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-18 Thread maxim wexler
> > Or maybe the selected shell didn't initialize, > including grub's if this > is at that point? I managed to emerge grub-0.96 finally onto the non-booting machine hoping that would turn the trick, and ran grub-install. The result was the same as near the start of this thread: GRUB Loading stag

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-18 Thread Robert G. Hays
[digest-mode reply] Richard Fish schreef: maxim wexler wrote: But it's a dead console. The caps lock key and the num lock key turn the leds on and off but typing letters does nothing. I've been trying to come up with a reasonable explanation for this behavior. OK, it

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-18 Thread maxim wexler
> /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0 > exists, > you can change the symlink to point to that, run > emerge --sync, and that > should get your portage tree up to date on the k6. Done. Now it's !!! ARCH is not set ... are you missing the /etc/make.profile symlink? !!! Is the symlink co

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-18 Thread maxim wexler
> OK, it may not be a reasonable explanation, but it > does make 'sense'-- > is it possible that the text color is the same as > the background color, > so that letters are being typed, but you simply > don't *see* them? I LOL Yeah, it's invisible ascii! You have to heat the screen with a blow-dry

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-18 Thread maxim wexler
> > I've been trying to come up with a reasonable > explanation for this > behavior. Assuming that you can enter the BIOS somewhere in the code there must be a line that says print the letters G-R-U-B to a console then stop. > setup screens with this > keyboard, I have no answer to why this would

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-18 Thread Holly Bostick
Richard Fish schreef: > maxim wexler wrote: >> >>But it's a dead console. The caps lock key and the num >>lock key turn the leds on and off but typing letters >>does nothing. > > > > I've been trying to come up with a reasonable explanation for this > behavior. OK, it may not be a reasonable

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-18 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >> Is /etc/make.profile correct? It should be symbolic >> link to >> ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0 > > > It is but it links to 2004.3, which is what I used on > the k6. The sempron uses 2005.0 > If the directory /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-16 Thread maxim wexler
> I assume you meant the directory "ls -l > /usr/portage/sys-boot/grub"? You are right. > Well, the 0.95-20040823 ebuild is masked ~x86 > (testing). But you should > also have 0.96, 0.96-r1, and 0.96-r2, and 0.96-r1 is > marked stable. Nope, nothing higher than 0.95. > > Do you get a differen

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-15 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: > well, it built the .94 version, the one I already > have. All the while interspersing yellow-flagged > warnings about upgrading to a version that uses > tool-chain functions. Is that the one I need? How do I > tell it to build the .96? I've run merge --sync a > couple of time

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-15 Thread maxim wexler
> "emerge --buildpkgonly --oneshot grub" should do for well, it built the .94 version, the one I already have. All the while interspersing yellow-flagged warnings about upgrading to a version that uses tool-chain functions. Is that the one I need? How do I tell it to build the .96? I've run merge

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-15 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: > Thanks for hanging in there with me, Richard No problem. >> Anyway, back to grub. 2 things. >> upgrade to 0.96, repeat > > machine. Then I used it to wget the tarball that > emerge -av, on the sempron box, says it needs, > pppconfig-2.3.9, and copied it to a floppy. I put

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-15 Thread maxim wexler
Thanks for hanging in there with me, Richard > Anyway, back to grub. 2 things. > upgrade to 0.96, repeat If I could setup ppp on the sempron box it would be much simpler. But pppconfig is not on the 2005.0 pkg CD. I managed to set it up on the k6(2004.3)box alright and it sure came in handy. IIRC

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-14 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: > Arrrgh, everytime I hit or an > the find dialogue opens and > Im knocked out of this text window. > Firefox v.1.0.4 That's not normal. If this is on Linux, possibly an extension you have installed is a problem, or there is some breakage in your ~/.gtkrc-2.0 file? Someth

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-13 Thread maxim wexler
> What happens if you try to mount it under Linux or > view it under > Windows? Do you see the files? > > You can double check the ISO by doing: > > # mount -o loop cdboot.iso /mnt/cdrom > > And then compare the files to those on your /boot > partition. hmmm, livecd / # mount -o loop cdboot

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-13 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >>If you have a FAT partition for sharing files >>between Linux and XP, you >> >> >Done. Same result. Perhaps the call to mkisofs was at fault. > > > What happens if you try to mount it under Linux or view it under Windows? Do you see the files? You can double check th

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-13 Thread maxim wexler
> If you have a FAT partition for sharing files > between Linux and XP, you Done. Same result. Perhaps the call to mkisofs was at fault. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- ge

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-10 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >> possible level, and may be more reliably. But maybe >> your burner is >> broken (?) > > > No, it's fine. Still under warranty. Works fine under > WinXP. If you have a FAT partition for sharing files between Linux and XP, you could copy the ISO to there and burn it under X

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-10 Thread maxim wexler
> possible level, and may be more reliably. But maybe > your burner is > broken (?) No, it's fine. Still under warranty. Works fine under WinXP. The reason I mentioned broadband is because big files(like install isos and pkg cds) can be downloaded in minutes instead of days. I can certainly down

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-10 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: > COASTER! Well, you could try again adding "speed=0" to the command, before the name of the ISO. That will drop the burning speed to the lowest possible level, and may be more reliably. But maybe your burner is broken (?) So, this friend of yours with the broadband and th

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-10 Thread Richard Fish
Neil Bothwick wrote: >You can put a lot of this into /etc/defaults/cdrecord, to save (mis) >typing it every time. > > > Cool, thanks. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-10 Thread maxim wexler
--- Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The correction was to replace "dev=/dev/cdrom" with > "dev=/dev/hdc". COASTER! Tried booting with the reader drive(Creative 24x DVD) -- it went clunk, clunk, clunk...nothing appeared on the screen but a blinking cursor. Tried booting with the wri

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 22:27:05 +0200, Richard Fish wrote: > If so, then we are ready to proceed with burning. Here is the command > that I use: > > cdrecord dev=/dev/cdrom -immed -eject driveropt=burnfree > > If your drive doesn't support burnfree, just take out the whole > "driveropt=burnfree"

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-09 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >>or to a USB key, and >> >> > >don't even know what that is > > > Also goes by the name "USB flash device"...small devices that could fit on a keychain (hence the 'key' part of that) that work like a small removable disk. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing li

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-09 Thread Zac Medico
--- maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard, please resend your follow up to this post > where you complain about the late hour. I deleted it > by mistake! It apparently had an important > correction. > > BTW, how long before these posts find there way into > an archive. > > -maxim >

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-09 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >Richard, please resend your follow up to this post >where you complain about the late hour. I deleted it >by mistake! It apparently had an important correction. > > The correction was to replace "dev=/dev/cdrom" with "dev=/dev/hdc". >BTW, how long before these posts find t

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-09 Thread maxim wexler
Richard, please resend your follow up to this post where you complain about the late hour. I deleted it by mistake! It apparently had an important correction. BTW, how long before these posts find there way into an archive. -maxim __ Discover Ya

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-09 Thread maxim wexler
> But, something just occurred to medoes this > system have 2 CD > burners, or a burner and a reader? If not, you will a burner and a reader > You may want to copy the .iso file over the network only dial-up available here. Networking different computers is a project in the long queue of

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-09 Thread Richard Fish
Richard Fish wrote: > cdrecord dev=/dev/cdrom -immed -eject driveropt=burnfree Sorry, it is getting late here. For you, that command line should be: cdrecord dev=/dev/hdc -immed -eject driveropt=burnfree Someday I will proofread my messages before posting... -RIchard -- gentoo-user@gento

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-09 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >Now, before burning it, I'm aware there have been >changes made in the burning process since the 2.6 >kernel. My experience using cdrecord has only been >wtth 2.4's, all coaster-making events :( From what >I've seen on line it should be as easy as > >#cdrecord /dev/hdc/ . > >

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-09 Thread maxim wexler
> You typod something. Looks like you put a space > between the '-' and the > first character of one of the options. Success! > these files included. You then use cdrecord to > write the ISO image to > the CD. Now, before burning it, I'm aware there have been changes made in the burning proc

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-08 Thread Richard Fish
Richard Fish wrote: >>But I have another question: At what point does >>vmlinuz(under /tmp/cdboot/boot)make it onto the CD? >>The path to stage2_eltorito seems to pass it by. >> >> >> >> > >When you run mkisofs, it creates an ISO (cdrom filesystem) image with >all of the files in the cdboot d

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-08 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >>>'cdboot/boot/grub/stage2_eltorito' ! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>That should be "-b boot/grub/stage2_eltorito"...so >>take the 'cdboot' off >>the front of that. >> >> > >Nope. Now I get: > >mkisofs: No such file or directory. Invalid node - - > > You typod something. Lo

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-08 Thread maxim wexler
> >'cdboot/boot/grub/stage2_eltorito' ! > > > > > > That should be "-b boot/grub/stage2_eltorito"...so > take the 'cdboot' off > the front of that. Nope. Now I get: mkisofs: No such file or directory. Invalid node - - But I have another question: At what point does vmlinuz(under /tmp/cdboot/b

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-07 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >>There be a '.' (or './', if you like) at the end of >>that, and yes, you >>should still be inside the cdboot directory. >> >>cd cdboot >>mkisofs -o /tmp/cdboot.iso -R \ >>-b boot/grub/stage2_eltorito \ >>-no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 \ >>-boot-info-table "./" >>

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-07 Thread Zac Medico
--- maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > There be a '.' (or './', if you like) at the end > of > > that, and yes, you > > should still be inside the cdboot directory. > > > > cd cdboot > > mkisofs -o /tmp/cdboot.iso -R \ > > -b boot/grub/stage2_eltorito \ > > -no-em

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-07 Thread maxim wexler
> > There be a '.' (or './', if you like) at the end of > that, and yes, you > should still be inside the cdboot directory. > > cd cdboot > mkisofs -o /tmp/cdboot.iso -R \ > -b boot/grub/stage2_eltorito \ > -no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 \ > -boot-info-table "./" > Here's 5 diffe

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-07 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: > > >>mkisofs -o /tmp/cdboot.iso -R \ >>-b boot/grub/stage2_eltorito \ >>-no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table >>\ >> >> >Not it's: > >mkisofs: Missing pathspec. >Usage: mkisofs [options] file... > > > There be a '.' (or './', if you like) at the end

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-07 Thread maxim wexler
> mkisofs -o /tmp/cdboot.iso -R \ > -b boot/grub/stage2_eltorito \ > -no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table > \ Not it's: mkisofs: Missing pathspec. Usage: mkisofs [options] file... You didn't say return to / so I'm assuming you want me to issue the command from livecd tmp #

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-06 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >>splashimage=(cd)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz >>title Gentoo >>kernel (cd)/boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/hda4 >> >> > ^ >I'm guessing this should be (cdrom), my first >cd-drive(/dev/hdc) > > No, it should be '(cd)'. It is the device name that the stage2_eltorito

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-06 Thread maxim wexler
> I can also give you the instructions for making a > bootable CD if you > want to try that. It isn't terribly hard, actually > it is a bit easier > than getting grub to work from a hard disk! But a > CD-RW drive/disk > would be the most useful... > > cd /tmp > mkdir -p cdboot/boot/grub > cd cd

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-06 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >>to copy your kernel >>to the floppy also, and load it from there. Your >>kernel is going to >>have to be fairly petite to fit...probably less than >>1.2M or so. >> >> >the kernel is already 1.57M. Are you saying I should >reconfig the kernel? I recall modularizing most

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-05 Thread maxim wexler
> to copy your kernel > to the floppy also, and load it from there. Your > kernel is going to > have to be fairly petite to fit...probably less than > 1.2M or so. the kernel is already 1.57M. Are you saying I should reconfig the kernel? I recall modularizing most of the stuff I wouldn't need unt

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-05 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >>There are 2 distinct problems here: >> >>1. Booting from floppyMaxim and I are very close >>to solving this >>one...only fixing up the grub.conf file remains. >>Rebuilding grub is not >>going to help a bit for this problem. >> >> > >In grub.conf commented out root(hd

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-05 Thread maxim wexler
> There are 2 distinct problems here: > > 1. Booting from floppyMaxim and I are very close > to solving this > one...only fixing up the grub.conf file remains. > Rebuilding grub is not > going to help a bit for this problem. In grub.conf commented out root(hd0,1) line; modified kernel line

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-05 Thread Richard Fish
rob3 wrote: >I still recommend that the problem child, so to speak, can be bypassed >by simply going to www.gnu.org, and downloading the latest source, and >compiling it outside of the Gentoo emerge system. Then when Gentoo gets >its ebuild working, you can always go back, doing a search on grub,

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-05 Thread rob3
Uwe Klosa wrote: >Well rob, I think you have to work with your attitude. I have setup several >systems whithout any problem emerging and setting up grub. >The problem might be on your side. > >Regards >Uwe > >rob3 wrote: > > >>Holly Bostick wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>maxim wexler schreef: >>> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-05 Thread Uwe Klosa
Well rob, I think you have to work with your attitude. I have setup several systems whithout any problem emerging and setting up grub. The problem might be on your side. Regards Uwe rob3 wrote: > Holly Bostick wrote: > > >>maxim wexler schreef: >> >> >> Remove the "root (hd0,1)" line. Th

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-05 Thread rob3
Holly Bostick wrote: >maxim wexler schreef: > > >>>Remove the "root (hd0,1)" line. That should (I >>>hope) let you boot >>>gentoo from the floppy. >>> >>> >> >>Arrrgh! Now when I choose "Gentoo" from the menu: >> >>Booting 'Gentoo' >>kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/hda4 >> >>Error 15: File not

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-05 Thread Holly Bostick
maxim wexler schreef: >>Remove the "root (hd0,1)" line. That should (I >>hope) let you boot >>gentoo from the floppy. > > > > Arrrgh! Now when I choose "Gentoo" from the menu: > > Booting 'Gentoo' > kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/hda4 > > Error 15: File not found > > Press any key to continue...

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-04 Thread Mark Knecht
kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/hda4 or possibly kernel (hd0,0)/boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/hda4 which would be more the way I usually do it. On 6/4/05, maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Remove the "root (hd0,1)" line. That should (I > > hope) let you boot > > gentoo from the fl

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-04 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >>Remove the "root (hd0,1)" line. That should (I >>hope) let you boot >>gentoo from the floppy. >> >> > > >Arrrgh! Now when I choose "Gentoo" from the menu: > >Booting 'Gentoo' >kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/hda4 > >Error 15: File not found > >Press any key to continue... > >

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-04 Thread maxim wexler
> > > Remove the "root (hd0,1)" line. That should (I > hope) let you boot > gentoo from the floppy. Arrrgh! Now when I choose "Gentoo" from the menu: Booting 'Gentoo' kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/hda4 Error 15: File not found Press any key to continue... _

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-03 Thread Peter De Zutter
Struggled once also with a grub problem, and there was a thing that solved If my grub.conf was like this, : title=Gentoo Linux 2.6.11-r8 (+fb +splash -agpart +sata)     root (hd0,1)     kernel=/kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r8 video=vesafb:ywrap,mtrr splash=verbose     initrd=/initrd-gentoo-hi

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-03 Thread Richard Fish
Richard Fish wrote: >maxim wexler wrote: > > > >>>Ah, some progress at last! Seems like there is a >>>problem in the >>>grub.conf file, but nothing too serious. Could you >>>re-post that file? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>default 0 >>timeout 30 >>title=Gentoo >>root (hd0,1) >> >> >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-03 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >>I took a peek at the manual for your MB. You might >>want to double check >>the BIOS settings for the hard disk and make sure >>that LBA/Large mode is >>set to "Auto". >> >> > >It *is*. The only other choice is "disabled". > > > >>Also, what is the CHS reported by the

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-03 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >>Ah, some progress at last! Seems like there is a >>problem in the >>grub.conf file, but nothing too serious. Could you >>re-post that file? >> >> >> >default 0 >timeout 30 >title=Gentoo >root (hd0,1) > > Remove the "root (hd0,1)" line. That should (I hope) let you bo

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-03 Thread maxim wexler
> > Ah, some progress at last! Seems like there is a > problem in the > grub.conf file, but nothing too serious. Could you > re-post that file? > default 0 timeout 30 title=Gentoo root (hd0,1) kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/hda4 title=WinXP rootnoverify (hd0,0) makeactive chainloader +1 > -Richard

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-03 Thread maxim wexler
> I took a peek at the manual for your MB. You might > want to double check > the BIOS settings for the hard disk and make sure > that LBA/Large mode is > set to "Auto". It *is*. The only other choice is "disabled". > > Also, what is the CHS reported by the kernel in the > dmesg output? If i

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-03 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >Oops, > >What I was trying to say before I hit the wrong key, I >paused the boot screen on the non-booting gentoo box >and took a look at the HD line. It says the LBA mode >is off. 32 bit mode is off. DMA mode is UDMA6, PIO >mode is 4 > >FWIW > I took a peek at the manual for

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-03 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >>You should now reboot, and get a boot menu from the >>floppy disk. If so, >> >> > >Here's what happens: Grub loading stage2 > >followed by the menu. Gentoo or WinXp. WinXP boots OK. >When Gentoo is chosen however, a console opens with >the words: Booting Gentoo >

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-03 Thread maxim wexler
Oops, What I was trying to say before I hit the wrong key, I paused the boot screen on the non-booting gentoo box and took a look at the HD line. It says the LBA mode is off. 32 bit mode is off. DMA mode is UDMA6, PIO mode is 4 FWIW -mw __ Disc

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-03 Thread maxim wexler
> You should now reboot, and get a boot menu from the > floppy disk. If so, Here's what happens: Grub loading stage2 followed by the menu. Gentoo or WinXp. WinXP boots OK. When Gentoo is chosen however, a console opens with the words: Booting Gentoo root (hd0,1) then nothi

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-03 Thread Michael Ulm
maxim wexler wrote: http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/grub-legacy-faq.en.html HTH, Michael Thanks for the tip. But before I try this(and this goes for Richard F's suggestion) how do I safely get rid of the grub I have? Or do I need to? The emerge -C flag comes w/ dire warnings, The manual e

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-02 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/grub-legacy-faq.en.html > > >>HTH, >> >>Michael >> >> > >Thanks for the tip. But before I try this(and this >goes for Richard F's suggestion) how do I safely get >rid of the grub I have? Or do I need to? The emerge -C >flag comes w/ dire

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-02 Thread maxim wexler
> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/grub-legacy-faq.en.html > > HTH, > > Michael Thanks for the tip. But before I try this(and this goes for Richard F's suggestion) how do I safely get rid of the grub I have? Or do I need to? The emerge -C flag comes w/ dire warnings, The manual entry for -c ment

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-01 Thread Richard Fish
maxim wexler wrote: >but #grub > >GNU GRUB version 0.94 (640K lower / 3072K upper >memory) > > > Well, you could try updating grub. 0.96-r1 is what is current for stable x86. I could also send you directly my stage1, e2fs_stage_1_5, and stage2 files. It would allow us to eliminate (or

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-06-01 Thread Michael Ulm
maxim wexler wrote: And which OS are you choosing from the menu again, maxim (assuming you get to a menu)? Or does this affect all OSes in your menu? no choice. After grub-install I get the Grub loading stage1.5 Grub loading, please wait... message(white text,black bg). To get back to Macr

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-05-31 Thread Scott Jones
Maxim, I just had to chroot iinto my system from livecd and I got a similar error message from Grub (referring to your 3rd post) anyways try this command it let me use Grub from inside chroot: mount -o bind /dev /mnt/gentoo/dev I got it from this thread on forums: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewt

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-05-31 Thread Holly Bostick
maxim wexler schreef: >>And which OS are you choosing from the menu again, >>maxim (assuming you >>get to a menu)? Or does this affect all OSes in your >>menu? > > > no choice. After grub-install I get the > > Grub loading stage1.5 > Grub loading, please wait... > > message(white text,black bg

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-05-31 Thread maxim wexler
> And which OS are you choosing from the menu again, > maxim (assuming you > get to a menu)? Or does this affect all OSes in your > menu? no choice. After grub-install I get the Grub loading stage1.5 Grub loading, please wait... message(white text,black bg). To get back to Macroshaft I boot int

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-05-31 Thread maxim wexler
> > Ok, quick comparison to my results... > > grub> root (hd0,0) > Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83 > > grub> setup (hd0) > Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists... no > Checking if "/grub/stage1" exists... yes > Checking if "/grub/stage2" exists... yes > Checking if "/grub/e

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-05-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:55:39 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote: > > Yes, it is optional, and worth disabling if you have problems. GRUB > > will bail out with no error message if you set an incorrect path for > > splashimage. > You're right, of course, Neil, but from the original post I believe we > a

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-05-31 Thread Holly Bostick
Neil Bothwick schreef: > On Tue, 31 May 2005 14:51:49 -0700 (PDT), maxim wexler wrote: > > >>Whoa! IIRC splashimage is optional. Can somebody weigh >>in here? > > > Yes, it is optional, and worth disabling if you have problems. GRUB will > bail out with no error message if you set an incorrect

Re: [gentoo-user] grub still broke

2005-05-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 31 May 2005 14:51:49 -0700 (PDT), maxim wexler wrote: > Whoa! IIRC splashimage is optional. Can somebody weigh > in here? Yes, it is optional, and worth disabling if you have problems. GRUB will bail out with no error message if you set an incorrect path for splashimage. -- Neil Bothw

  1   2   >