Re: PCMCIA Ethernet cards: wireless and X-jax

2000-08-28 Thread Derek Martin
Yesterday, Rodent of Unusual Size gleaned this insight: > Jerry Feldman wrote: > > > > I recently did some benchmarks. The 16 bit non-cardbus PCMCIA cards > > will not exceed 10 Mbps. Make sure you get the cardbus versions. > > Huh. Spurred by this message, I did a little testing of my own. >

Re: open files, super-newbie-question

2000-08-28 Thread Derek Martin
Today, Patrick J. O'Rourke gleaned this insight: > > > You can do it any time, but as a practical matter you don't generally > > change this value once you figure out what you need it to be, and you > > generally will always need it to be set to that value, so in general it's > > something you'd

Re: FW: Possible DoS attack?

2000-08-28 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Lori Hitchcock wrote: > At this point we can ping the system, but we can't access it at all. Ssh > is apparently down, as is apache, sendmail, and inn. It responds to all > connection requests instantaneously with a "Connection refused" error, > which makes me suspect that the

Re: PCMCIA Ethernet cards: wireless and X-jax

2000-08-28 Thread Jerry Feldman
I first decided to run a benchmark based on a comment that some of the 10/100 cards are really 10. The main difference is that the non-cardbus PCMCIA cards are 16 bit cards and the cardbus cards are 32 bit. I used the ttcp utility to perform my benchmarks. The benchmarks were all done using Lin

Re: PCMCIA Ethernet cards: wireless and X-jax

2000-08-28 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Jerry Feldman wrote: > > I recently did some benchmarks. The 16 bit non-cardbus PCMCIA cards > will not exceed 10 Mbps. Make sure you get the cardbus versions. Huh. Spurred by this message, I did a little testing of my own. My 3Com 3C574-TX 10/100 PCMCIA wouldn't push through much faster than 1

Re: open files, super-newbie-question

2000-08-28 Thread Patrick J. O'Rourke
> You can do it any time, but as a practical matter you don't generally > change this value once you figure out what you need it to be, and you > generally will always need it to be set to that value, so in general it's > something you'd want to do at boot time. Right. I thought that Bruce was

Re: open files, super-newbie-question

2000-08-28 Thread Derek Martin
Today, Patrick J. O'Rourke gleaned this insight: > > For the whole system, its very easy: > > > > echo 4096 >/proc/sys/fs/file-max > > You can also use the sysctl(8) command: > > sysctl -w fs.file-max=131072 > > > Note that you'll have to do that at boot-time to (probably in > > /et

Re: FW: Possible DoS attack?

2000-08-28 Thread Farrell Woods
> At this point we can ping the system, but we can't access it at all. Ssh > is apparently down, as is apache, sendmail, and inn. It responds to all > connection requests instantaneously with a "Connection refused" error, This usually means that the network interface is up and running but that t

Re: FW: Possible DoS attack?

2000-08-28 Thread Bruce Dawson
Hi John! I'm not familar with the syslog output you have, but I assume the "(113)" is a port number on the remote system - that's likely the identd process, which is frequently used to either: 1) Verify the identity of a mail sender. 2) Discover potential user names on a system. So, going *way

FW: Possible DoS attack?

2000-08-28 Thread Lori Hitchcock
Lori Hitchcock Hitchcock Staffing 800-867-9188 -Original Message- From: John Abreau [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Possible DoS attack? We lost access to a server at work; unfortuna

Re: open files, super-newbie-question

2000-08-28 Thread Bruce Dawson
In the past, I've had to do this for turnkey servers that would occasionally, but undesirably run out of file handles during their busiest time. Since modifying /proc/... doesn't physically change anything on the filesystem (like the kernel image), the change disappears on the next boot. Putting

Re: open files, super-newbie-question

2000-08-28 Thread Patrick J. O'Rourke
> For the whole system, its very easy: > > echo 4096 >/proc/sys/fs/file-max You can also use the sysctl(8) command: sysctl -w fs.file-max=131072 > Note that you'll have to do that at boot-time to (probably in > /etc/rc.d/rc.local). Just curious, but why would you have to do thi

Humor: Windows 95

2000-08-28 Thread Derek Martin
If you've ever gotten mad at Windows 95 (I know I have, thousands of times), or you like the Rolling Stones, you may well enjoy this: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view.php3?id=1412 It requires flash or shock or whichever one of those works with Linux... I can't remember which. -- You k

Re: Printers

2000-08-28 Thread Derek Martin
Today, Larry Cook gleaned this insight: > I have the 600C and had a similar experience. After searching the Internet I > found my solution. Unfortunately, I don't remember where so I'll have to just > tell you in my own words. Although maybe you've already tried this: > > Ink gets left in var

Re: Printers

2000-08-28 Thread Larry Cook
Derek Martin wrote: > I've had this thing since the 660C came out (technically it's a 660Cse, > which I think means I got some extra paper included or something). After > about the third time I changed the cartridges, it started to, well, suck. > Cleaning and realigning the heads did absolutely

Re: open files, super-newbie-question

2000-08-28 Thread Derek Martin
Today, Bruce Dawson gleaned this insight: > For the whole system, its very easy: > > echo 4096 >/proc/sys/fs/file-max > > Note that you'll have to do that at boot-time to (probably in > /etc/rc.d/rc.local). > > However, if you want to increase the per-process limit, its more > complex -

Re: Printers

2000-08-28 Thread Derek Martin
Today, Bayard Coolidge USG ZKO3-3/S20 gleaned this insight: > Hi, Derek - > > Sorry for the slow response, but I don't get the list at home and I > can't dial in. No appology necessary... besides which I wasn't expecting much of a response on the weekend; I have noticed that the list traffic re

Re: open files, super-newbie-question

2000-08-28 Thread Bruce Dawson
For the whole system, its very easy: echo 4096 >/proc/sys/fs/file-max Note that you'll have to do that at boot-time to (probably in /etc/rc.d/rc.local). However, if you want to increase the per-process limit, its more complex - you have to rebuild glibc after changing the appropriate va

Re: open files, super-newbie-question

2000-08-28 Thread Derek Martin
Today, Diego gleaned this insight: > Dear Gurus, > > I am using RH 6.2 & 6.2: I would like to know how to increase the > 'open files limit' fo the whole system, not per user bases, sorry very > newbie question. The ulimit -a tell me 1024 open files. Thanks for > your time. Diego Mezzera. If you

Re: open files, super-newbie-question

2000-08-28 Thread Steven W. Orr
You need to set it using PAM. The change will go into /etc/security/limits.conf Have fun. -- -Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Stranger things have happened but none stranger than this. Steven W. Orr- Does your driver's license say Organ Donor?Black holes

Re: PCMCIA Ethernet cards: wireless and X-jax

2000-08-28 Thread Rich Payne
FWIW, I just setup a 3Com AirConnect (3CRWE737A) Wireless LAN card in my thinkpad (Linux only). It works with the Spectrum24t driver (not included in the regular pcmcia-cs distribution, you have to grab the driver from the contrib directory: ftp://pcmcia-cs.sourceforge.net/pub/pcmcia-cs/contrib/)

open files, super-newbie-question

2000-08-28 Thread Diego
Dear Gurus,   I am using RH 6.2 & 6.2: I would like to know how to increase the 'open files limit' fo the whole system, not per user bases, sorry very newbie question. The ulimit -a tell  me 1024 open files. Thanks for your time. Diego Mezzera.

from the New York Times

2000-08-28 Thread Charles Farinella
A good article about open source on the front page of todays online Times: http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/08/biztech/articles/28code.html -- Charles Farinella [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMA