I cannot forget what this man did. How can we forget when someone as HIGH (&
mighty as some posters have noted here) as MFH, when he is so well adored by
most of the posters on this forum who purport him to be amost god-like himself
(and we must feel SORRY for him, as he has to flitter from cou
be aware of all that. Naguesh [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: goanet@lists.goanet.org> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008
> 01:51:48 +0530> Subject: Re: [Goanet] Pamphlet Circulated for Hindu
> Dharmajagruti Sabha - protest against MF Husain> > Lets forget about
Lets forget about his paintings of nude Hindu gods and godesses..as someone may
still see it as an modern or some other art or may be MF taking undue advantage
of Hindu tolrance.
But he went to the extent painting his own mother India nude? He was so
obsessed in nudity, vulgarity that he didn't
.The big question posed recently by M.F Hussain's controversial
paintings. Should artists be given liberty to express their creativity
by making drawings and cartoons of Gods and Goddesses ? A freedom of
expression also warrants responsibility towards society. One should not
outrage any community,
Maqbool Fida Husain's works have always been extreme. His controversial
painting so far only depicts as if he cannot thing any other creative topics
than sex.
Husain has so far depicted: Naked Hanuman and Goddess Sita (This picture
shows a naked Hanuman attacking a naked demon king Ravana while G
> From: "Rajan P. Parrikar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Goanet] Pamphlet Circulated for Hindu Dharmajagruti
>Sabha - protest against MF Husain !!
> To Goanet -
> Hussein wouldn't dare sketch a portrait of Allah or Prophet
> Mohammed for he we
Ms Carvalho,
Not being a an art critic I cannot discuss artists and
their paintings, most probably styles would have to be
taken into consideration.
As far as Hussain is concerned, he graduated directly
from painting posters(I think it is cinema posters) to
painting horses. I am yet to know which
To Goanet -
I have no issues whatsoever with MF Hussein or anyone else
doing erotic and even vulgar paintings of Hindu gods and
goddesses. Yes, some of the depiction may offend me, but
a mature, civilized society ought to be able to absorb slights
to its cherished beliefs, and offer its member
--- Sachin Phadte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The second, and more important, is whether the
> nude/erotic paintings/carvings in Hindu temples are
> those of the Hindu gods and goddesses.
>
This issue has also been addressed earlier on Goanet.
Please see another post in the archives:
http://w
--- Sachin Phadte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As she herself wrote recently that she does not read
> all the messages on Goanet, I presume she will give
> me the same privilege. I do not remember her asking
> me this question. And for me to answer the question,
> will she tell me if in Da Vin
I once saw a painting of a Hindu Goddess painted by
Hussain ( I do not know which goddess it was ) riding
on Hanuman's tail. I am a Catholic but was utterly
revolted by this painting !! It was tasteless and was
obvious that it would hurt the sentiments of a great
number of people.
Freedom when it
Sachin Phadte wrote:
I stand corrected that there are no temples in Goa with nude carvings. There
are, however, two issues. One is the rule and the exception.
The second, and more important, is whether the nude/erotic paintings/carvings
in Hindu temples are those of the Hindu gods and goddesses.
To Goanet -
Frederick Noronha wrote:
>There's the 'nagdo betaal' at Loliem in Canacona?
The traditional Vetal is gloriously naagdo. Almost all
the ancient idols of Vetal in Goa are naagde. In recent
times, he has taken to wearing the dhoti in some temples
so as to not shock the puritanical se
Thanbk you Sachin, that is my point exactly. How, when & why the original
statues, such as the vast temples in Madurai & surrounding areas where such
temples were, nor the temples around the rest of India is not in question.
But if anyone can name any of the Gods & Goddesses which are dep
--- "Frederick [FN] Noron ha * फà¥à¤°à¥à¤¡
रिठन à¥à¤°à¥à¤à¤¯à¤¾"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thirdly,
> it's best if reform comes from within the religion,
> rather than we
> preaching how *others* should reform. Fourthly, I
> think there are far
> more important things that co
Fredrick Noronha writes: "Firstly, artists should have artistic freedom
(without it being decided upon by the mullahs -- whether they are Christian,
Hindu, Muslim, secular, atheist, agnostic or whatever)."
In which case it is necessary to do away with censor boards all over the world.
In which
Selma writes: "Sachin,For some odd reason, I've always considered you a
moderate. Now, I realise that I'm confused as to what constitutes a moderate,
just as you are confused about what constitutes a secular democracy."
Let us not make any patronising statements about anyone else. You have
s
Sachin wrote: Does this mean that he can
> get away with painting Hindu gods and goddesses in
> nude? One of the other objection to Hussain's
> painting is that he has exhibited his artisitic
> freedom in such a manner only with respect to Hindu
> gods and goddesses. He has not painted secular
> fi
To my comment: "As far as "many" temples with nude carvings, the statement
would give an impression that there is a very significant numbers of such
temples. I do not think there is a single temple in Goa with nude carvings."
Santosh Helekar responded as follows: "This is not true. There are a
On 07/02/2008, Rajan P. Parrikar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To Goanet -
>
> Sachin Phadte wrote:
> >I do not think there is a single temple in Goa with nude carvings.
>
> There are. Among them is the not-so-well-known Brahmani
> temple in the village of Toldem located in northern Sanguem
> taluk
To Goanet -
Sachin Phadte wrote:
>I do not think there is a single temple in Goa with nude carvings.
There are. Among them is the not-so-well-known Brahmani
temple in the village of Toldem located in northern Sanguem
taluka.
Regards,
r
--- Sachin Phadte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does this mean that he can
> get away with painting Hindu gods and goddesses in
> nude? One of the other objection to Hussain's
> painting is that he has exhibited his artisitic
> freedom in such a manner only with respect to Hindu
> gods and goddesses
--- Sachin Phadte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>As far as "many" temples with nude carvings, the
>statement would give an impression that there is a
>very significant numbers of such temples. I do not
>think there is a single temple in Goa with nude
>carvings.
>
This is not true. There are at leas
Marshall Mendonca wrote: "However what he did was not unexceptional. In India
we have the Khajuraho Temple where human bodies are carved in stone in the nude
in a number of sexual positions. Similarly in many of the temples in India we
see such nude carvings."
What you see in Khajurao is human
John Monteiro wrote:
I have made my protest clear on the comments page. This has been going on
for some time now, but for NDTV to promote MF Hasain is an insult to all
Hindu-practicising peoples & also those of other religions. To debase
another person's God or other deities is not a decent thing
I have made my protest clear on the comments page. This has been going on
for some time now, but for NDTV to promote MF Hasain is an insult to all
Hindu-practicising peoples & also those of other religions. To debase
another person's God or other deities is not a decent thing to do.
I can wel
[A pamphlet was used for mobilisation of people for the recent
Hindu Dharmajagruti Sabha (organised by the Hindu Janajagruti
Samiti) which was held at Marcaim on 1st
February 2008. The meeting was proposed to be held in at Farmagudi
Government Engineering College Grounds, but permission was refused
27 matches
Mail list logo