Thanks for the response. I just dont see a reason why Google can't
allow dummy data to be entered via the built in admin interface. If it
can create forms when there is data, why cant it create forms without
data?
On Jan 9, 2:44 am, Alexander Kojevnikov
wrote:
> You can include the 'shell' appli
You can include the 'shell' application from the official appengine
samples with your app, and add/edit/delete the entities from Python
shell.
Source: http://code.google.com/p/google-app-engine-samples/downloads/list
Demo: http://shell.appspot.com/
Don't forget to restrict access to shell, e.g.
I'm using the "$PYTHON_LIB/google/appengine/ext/admin" script in
several apps exactly as shown in the example here:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/configuringanapp.html#Referring_to_the_Python_Library_Directory
All apps authenticate as expected, except for one. It returns:
"Your client d
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009, Marzia Niccolai wrote:
>
> Usually if you are getting a 500 server error with no logs like you have
> described, this means there is some typo in the app.yaml file that was
> uploaded. We've seen this issue come up because of improper spacing, line
> endings or a typo in the
Is this treated well (and accepted as proper usage) by all standards
and browser?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@goog
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/users/loginurls.html
At the link above it explains how to send a user off to sign-in or
register in a python script. The code below does what I want, but I
don't know how to do the same thing as an html hyperlink on my
applications "home" page. Not all users
That's it! Thanks Alex.
I had a little trouble tracking down the file, wish this were better
documented. For anybody who discovers this later, I found it here
$ sudo find / -name "dev_appserver.datastore.history" -print
/private/var/folders/Mq/Mq6HCC1-F8enD-Rr+rKv2k+++TI/-Tmp-/
dev_appserver.d
Repeating a couple of things I mentioned to Greg in email, for the list
discussion:
A single-server SQL database with low load and tables with rows numbering in
the thousands can do lots of cool things with that data in a reasonable
amount of time. But many of the features of a SQL query engine ha
I really like GAE's admin interface save for one thing: it doesnt let
me enter dummy data--it says I must do it programmatically. While I'm
sure there is some legitimate reason for this, I still would like an
automated set of forms generated from my existing models. Is anyone
else in the same boat
On Jan 9, 1:22 am, Alexander Kojevnikov
wrote:
> > Looking at it more deeply every 20th one takes a long time. I assume
> > that's the data fetch.
>
> I guess you are iterating over a Query or GqlQuery object to get the
> entities? This explains explain why every 20th iteration.
> Fromhttp://c
On Jan 9, 4:15 am, Tzakie wrote:
> [...]
>
> Can't you guys make something that just returns the keys from a query?
> That seems consistent with how I think big table works.
I'm pretty sure there should be a solution for this as BigTable is
basically a distributed hashmap, so fetching only the
I am running the latest GAppEngine SDK on Leopard with Python 2.5.4.
As mentioned in the initial post, I have configured each of the web
servers to run on specific ports (and both are configured to use their
own data storage).
I am noticing the issue when one of the web servers if responding to a
> Quite frankly, I can't think of a Google web app that displays 100 of
> anything all at once...
I'm getting the impression that people think what I'm asking for is
ridiculous
and off the radar. I sent you an e-mail with the urls of the current
app and
what I am working on. When you see it in c
On Jan 8, 3:44 pm, "Amir Michail" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:34 PM, boson wrote:
>
> > On Jan 8, 1:00 pm, "Amir Michail" wrote:
> >> But how would you do this with a 24 hour rolling window?
>
> > My solution was for a simple fixed 24-hour chunks.
>
> > But you could adapt it to store 2
I have a problem that I am unable to understand. One minute my
appengine app was running fine, the next it was giving this error:
ImportError: cannot import name webapp
Older projects that I built on app engine seem to be working fine.
The full stack trace is:
ERROR2009-01-09 00:19:27,800 de
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:56 PM, mscwd01 wrote:
>
>
> In short, i'd like to use App Engine to return xml responses to my
> Android App - instead of using App Engine for the usual browser based
> web application.
>
> Is this allowed?
I hope so! I'm planning on doing the same thing! (Except with
Thanks for your quick reply Dan, I shall be using App Engine in the
not-to-distant future it seems.
... I shall need to learn Python now :)
On Jan 8, 11:57 pm, Dan Sanderson wrote:
> Yup, you can definitely use App Engine to create web services like you
> describe. A networked backend for an A
Yup, you can definitely use App Engine to create web services like you
describe. A networked backend for an Android app is a great use of App
Engine.
-- Dan
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:56 PM, mscwd01 wrote:
>
> I have taken a look around the App Engine documentation but havent
> been able to find
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Tzakie wrote:
>
> Thanks very much for your time guys.
>
No problem, happy to help.
> When you call:
> CategoryRows = db.GqlQuery(QueryString)
> It's fast.
>
> It's the loop where you try and access the returned entities that
> is slow. Doesn't it follow that th
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:34 PM, boson wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 1:00 pm, "Amir Michail" wrote:
>> But how would you do this with a 24 hour rolling window?
>
> My solution was for a simple fixed 24-hour chunks.
>
> But you could adapt it to store 24 fixed hourly chunks in each entity
> and a timestamp
Hey Dan and Boson,
Thanks very much for your time guys.
When you call:
CategoryRows = db.GqlQuery(QueryString)
It's fast.
It's the loop where you try and access the returned entities that
is slow. Doesn't it follow that the CategoryRows has the keys in it
and the next() in the python loop is fe
I have taken a look around the App Engine documentation but havent
been able to find a definitive answer to my question, so I hoped i'd
get an answer by posting here ;)
I am developing an Android application which makes substantial use of
Google APIs; I had planned to set up my own dedicated serv
> Looking at it more deeply every 20th one takes a long time. I assume
> that's the data fetch.
>
I guess you are iterating over a Query or GqlQuery object to get the
entities? This explains explain why every 20th iteration. From
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/datastore/queryclass.html :
There is currently no way to retrieve only parts of entities, nor just keys,
from the datastore in response to queries. There's no way to dig out the
keys either: the datastore returns the full entities in response to queries,
there is no intermediate app-side step that fetches entities for keys.
Try removing the database access history file, then restarting the
development server. The file is called dev_appserver.datastore.history
and located in the tmp directory.
The development server auto-generates the indices based on the history
file, even if you don't run the corresponding queries
Just a few questions on static files:
1. Does serving a static file cost CPU usage?
2. Does having a large number of static files (let's say like 700)
have _any_ effect on performance of page serving [similarly, does
having a lot of mappings affect performance]?
3. When a python script reads a
BigTable is an object store, so you can't ask it for specific fields
like you can in a traditional database. In the future we may get new
tools from Google that operate in cloud data and return a result
(MapReduce, etc.), but not yet.
You might try (like Dan said) breaking your entities up into
Yes I have a main(), but the zipimporter is not in the .py file
containing the main() it is in an imported file.
The zipimporter is writing out its own info into the log.. for every
request - should this happen if it is cached?
On Jan 8, 5:34 pm, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> One question -- are yo
On Jan 8, 1:00 pm, "Amir Michail" wrote:
> But how would you do this with a 24 hour rolling window?
My solution was for a simple fixed 24-hour chunks.
But you could adapt it to store 24 fixed hourly chunks in each entity
and a timestamp to identify the window. Then roll the data back by
the pr
Hi,
About that probabilistic stuff I was talking about, it turned out to
be unnecessary for my app.
A very simple solution not involving probability:
* associate a ratio with each user taking into account the score and
the number of times that user has been selected
* when selecting a user, us
Hi,
First, regarding Google Checkout - this will be the only method of payment
available when billing launches, however, we are still committed to
supporting our developers who live in the few countries where Google
Checkout is not available. For developers located in those countries, quotas
for p
>Similarly, if you want the query to return
>just the keys, you'll need entities containing the properties that are the
>subjects of query filters and the keys for the full entities.
so there is no way to
QueryString="SELECT * FROM USER_INVENTORY WHERE TUSER_ID=432 AND
CATEGORY_ID=23423"
Categor
Actually the link that helped me is this one.
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/users/loginurls.html
On Jan 8, 4:32 pm, thebrianschott wrote:
> > >http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/thedevwebserver.html
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message beca
Boson,
Thanks, somehow I had misread the link in the docs to say the
information there was only for the developer's local system. But it
was for the productions system. So I read more carefully and our app
is primitive, but it works now. So I may start another thread, as you
suggest, but not till
If you only need some of the properties for the query that needs 100+
results, you'll need to create a separate set of entities with just those
properties, and query those. Similarly, if you want the query to return
just the keys, you'll need entities containing the properties that are the
subject
Looking at it more deeply every 20th one takes a long time. I assume
that's the data fetch.
Still need a way to optimize...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this g
; ...
> lifetime_score = 14382 # total score over eternity
> daily_day = "20090108" # the last day a score was recorded
> daily_score = 153 # the score for daily_day
>
> When you update the score, do a transaction as follows:
> if today's date matches enti
ntity where you are tallying, track a day and a
score for that day:
user = "Kobe"
weight = "180"
...
lifetime_score = 14382 # total score over eternity
daily_day = "20090108" # the last day a score was recorded
daily_score = 153 # the score f
> 1. What is the shape of your data?
> i.e. how big are your entities and what do they contain?
class USER_INVENTORY(db.Model):
TUSER_ID = db.IntegerProperty()
ITEM_TYPE = db.StringProperty()
ITEM_ID = db.IntegerProperty()
SUFFIX_ID = db.IntegerProperty()
HAVE_INVENTORY = d
Brian,
It's hard to tell what you're actually stuck on, because you're
throwing out a lot of information about SVN, transactions, logging,
production vs. development, etc.
I suggest you start a new thread with a simple and distilled version
of your question, and only include short and relevant s
Hi,
How can this be done efficiently with the current version of the GAE?
I suppose you could keep track of all events affecting scoring for the
last 24 hours. Whenever you handle a request -- even one that does
not affect scoring -- you could prune out events older than 24 hours
and add a new
Tzakie,
A few things:
1. What is the shape of your data? i.e. how big are your entities and
what do they contain?
2. How are you using entity groups? Is all your data in a single
entity group (shared ancestor)?
3. Also try to experiment with permutations of your index and query to
try to iso
When writing the Cron application for gaeutilities I ran into the need
to ran two instances, as the dev_appserver can't make a request to
itself. All I did was run the second instance on a different port,
didn't have to mess with the address. Mind you, it didn't make a lot
of requests to the datas
These dev_appserver.py params seem important for running multiple
instances:
--address=ADDRESS, -a ADDRESS
Address to which this server should bind. (Default
localhost).
--port=PORT, -p PORT
Port for the server to run on. (Default 8080)
--datastore_path=PATH
Path to use for storing Datastore fi
Alex,
I've had no problem running 2 dev web servers on my MacBook Pro
(Leopard OS X). What OS are you using and are you launching
dev_appserver.py with the port options? You have to give more
detailed information.
Best,
Bill
On Jan 8, 2:39 pm, Alex Popescu
wrote:
> I am trying to run 2 dev w
I am trying to run 2 dev web servers on my local machine in order to
test some fetch functionality. Anyways, even if both apps are
configured to use different ports and they are running in 2 different
Python processes, this doesn't seem to work. Is this a known
limitation? Is there any workaround?
Is there any particular reason for having the Request class extend the
WebOb Request, while the Response is just extending object? As far as
I checked the Request class is the single dependency on WebOb
framework and I find it quite curious.
./alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
I've spend alot of time profiling and optimizing my app.
I've watched all the google io videos and done a ton of reading...
But there is one query I can't optimize away:
SELECT * FROM USER_INVENTORY WHERE TUSER_ID=637 AND CATEGORY_ID=2752
ORDER BY ITEM_NUMBER ASC, ITEM_NAME, SUFFIX_NAME
Yes the
Rodrigo,
Thank you very much. That does look simple.
If found this link which describes using
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/thedevwebserver.html
but it describes only what should be done on the development system. I
cannot find a page which describes your approach on the appspot
system.
I'm working to tune my indexes. I noticed a lot of unused indexes, so
I removed everything from my index.yaml and then added back one by one
while running the application locally with the "dev_appserver.py --
require_indexes" command. Everything was working good, so I went
ahead and ran the inde
All of a sudden this morning, I began getting this error in my app,
when doing a search inside of an internal process (searching for
duplicates) and then taking a count() of the results. It was working
fine before. I have this same query on a search page as well, and
it's still fine. The search
Am i missing something somewhere? I cant seem to find any pricing for
commericial applications even though google advertises app engine as a
solution for commericial deployment.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
One question -- are you defining a main() function? If not, your
entire app may be reloaded each time. Try putting logging statements
(or prints to sys.stderr) at the top-level of your module, and check
in the logs for these -- they should only be logged for the first
request. If they are logged f
Hi,
In order to serve an App Engine app off your domain it must be a Google Apps
domain. (2) alone is not sufficient.
-Marzia
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:59 AM, PatHaugen wrote:
>
> I searched groups and help, but still couldn't figure something out
> that may be misleading...
>
> http://appengi
Hi,
Currently the 302 redirect to 'www' is the only method available for using
the naked domain.
-Marzia
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Pankaj Vishwani wrote:
>
> I already tried all that but yahoo doesn't give any such thing for
> redirecting...
> can google give some other way to do it l
Hi,
Logs are kept around for awhile in the admin console, and you can access
different app version logs by changing the version number in your
application's dashboard (the number on in the left hand corner). You can
download your logs by using appcfg.py:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/app
Hi,
Usually if you are getting a 500 server error with no logs like you have
described, this means there is some typo in the app.yaml file that was
uploaded. We've seen this issue come up because of improper spacing, line
endings or a typo in the script name.
-Marzia
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:18
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:11 AM, PatHaugen wrote:
> Anyone get this to cleanly work as documented by Google?
not me. this is how i got it working:
http://appengine-cookbook.appspot.com/recipe/install-pil-in-mac-os-x
-- rodrigo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received t
Hi Ryan,
The behavior you've observed is by design. Google Accounts users must
explicitly sign in to any application wishing to have access to their
email. Google Apps does not have the same login policy.
-Marzia
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:17 PM, ryan wrote:
>
> I've written a basic App Engine
Installed the Google App Engine SDK: 1.1.7 11/21/08
http://code.google.com/appengine/downloads.html
Worked perfect.
Wanted to go into images, and test locally:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/images/installingPIL.html#mac
Installed this:
http://pythonmac.org/packages/py25-fat/dmg/PIL-1.1.
Hi all
I have installed google app engine sdk 1.1.7 on windows xp with python
2.5.4. I am a fresh starter on python and what i need to do is to
create a web service in python that communicates with google
datastore. Though i am reading the "Getting Started" tutorial at
http://code.google.com/appen
I am having a problem that I hope has an easy answer although I've
looked high and low for an answer. I am using app engine with
appenginepatch, including Django 1.x. When I attempt to send an email
I get an 'herror" Exception with Exception Value "(1, uknown host)".
>From the error output, line 1
I searched groups and help, but still couldn't figure something out
that may be misleading...
http://appengine.google.com/deployment/newdomain?app_id=XXX
So it informs me:
"Note: You must sign up for Google Apps to register this domain or
prove that you already own it."
1. Sign up for Google Ap
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:05 AM, thebrianschott wrote:
> Using logging.info() I have determined that the appspot is always
> return None for "user=users.get_current_user()" and that is why the
> app is working differently at appspot that locally. I have tried to
> make this a single "transaction" t
Hi Joseph,
I've previously made this point here -
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/6319dceae6ec73e7/4d4d464c25537bda?lnk=gst&q=#4d4d464c25537bda
- so Google - people really do recommend against GAE because your
rodmap is so impenetrable. Joseph, you may rec
Thanks Jeff
I have added this in the issues list
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=974
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Jeff S wrote:
>
> At the moment, there isn't really an option that avoids asking the
> user for their Google Account password. The Google Calendar API
try using a profiler.
in my case, i'm able to determine that web service & using stringio
use lots of cpu. you may need to remove some things like for example
not using both web service call and saving of information on a session
backed memcache.
On Jan 8, 1:49 pm, Ray Malone wrote:
> Hi I get
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:54 PM, cz wrote:
> I've been unable to make the chat times, is there a transcript
> archived somewhere?
They're posted to this list not long after each chat time. Check the
list archives for the previous ones.
Dave.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~---
Using logging.info() I have determined that the appspot is always
return None for "user=users.get_current_user()" and that is why the
app is working differently at appspot that locally. I have tried to
make this a single "transaction" to allow the value of user to be
determined in a timely way, bu
69 matches
Mail list logo
