And the jar is posted. All better?
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Sorry, we'll get a 2.0.1 incubator jar up today.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:04 AM, stuckagain david.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The changes to CurrencyData and CurrencyList as described
want TextBoxBase to implement HasDirection, which means moving the
implementation of setDirection and getDirection from TextBox /
TextArea to TextBoxBase.
On 2 פברואר, 23:00, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Extending TextBoxBase sounds perfectly reasonable, but what exactly are
you
Kill it! KI ITTT!
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
We can use the public Wave instance with alternate addresses. Inconvenient,
but it's not that big a deal.
On Feb 2, 2010 7:18 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand how...
One advantage is that super is
more discussions moving away from here (because I,
and maybe quite a few others here, don't have access to Wave).
Paul
Ray Ryan wrote:
We can use the public Wave instance with alternate addresses.
Inconvenient, but it's not that big a deal.
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web
Well, not nothing — it'd be pretty easy for a bot to be written to publish
static views of waves. But without that…
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
That's a very good point. I'm confident we could get anyone invited who
wants to participate, but there's nothing
Hey, all. I've just set up a de facto GWT Contrib Home Wave:
https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252Boe8GWDliE
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Daniel Dietrich cafeb...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi Bruce,
thank you for your commitment regarding Wave participation for GWT
Yes, you'll need an invitation to Wave.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Dietrich cafeb...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi Ray,
your link doesn't work for me. Do I need a Wave account?
Thanks in advance
- Daniel
On 2 Feb., 18:33, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Hey, all. I've just set
Extending TextBoxBase sounds perfectly reasonable, but what exactly are you
proposing to implement there?
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Tomer Greenberg tomer...@google.comwrote:
Hello gwters,
I'm going to add some BiDi functionality to TextBox and TextArea. Given
that their parent,
As you'll see in the first note in this thread, Incubator is closing down.
Having your work in its own project is exactly the right thing to do. If it
becomes an appropriate addition for GWT proper, we'll eagerly help you
integrate it. In the meantime, the community can use it and shape it
Creating new ResourceGenerators is trivial, and requires no changes to GWT
(one of the best features of ClientBundle). See TextResourceGenerator for an
example.
Dan, I'm afraid you can't expect anyone from the GWT team to jump on this
problem in Q1. We're saturated.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:12
But we'd be available for code reviews…
(Also see TextResource to see how to register the things.)
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Creating new ResourceGenerators is trivial, and requires no changes to GWT
(one of the best features of ClientBundle). See
LGTM
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 6:52 AM, monkeyboy dilbert.elbo...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello John.
I'm glad to see that PagingScrollTable will make it to the GWT trunk.
Even now it is a useful widget but I can't wait to see the final
version. I would like to ask a few questions. I am sorry to hear that
In Eclipse, I'm adding jars to the Java Build Path. My imports and
instantiations of the objects in the jars work fine with no errors
(not red underlined), but when i try to run the application, i get the
error java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError for all jar'd objects I try to
create. The servlet
I'm having the same problem your describing. Have you found the
solution?
On Dec 12 2009, 11:37 am, darkling darkling...@aol.com wrote:
I'm just learning GWT right now, I'm actually using smartGWT and
building inside Eclipse using eclipse's GWT plugin.
I'm trying to build a simple application
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7420
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Are you sure about those localhost reports? If you're thinking I said
that, I didn't.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
s/those localhost reports/those slow localhost resolution on Mac reports/
Localhost sure sounds like a better choice. And either way I hope
we're going to be consistent in the two spots this shows up in the
url: after the http://, and after codesvr=
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Ray Ryan rj
Piotr, even if the response to your
workhttp://blog.piotrj.org/2009/04/wndowname-hack-taken-step-further-full.htmlwas
muted the issue does come up a lot. It would be great to see this in a
project on code.google.com. Would it make sense in that form?
--
Bob?
On Jan 8, 2010 7:08 PM, Balaji Srinivasan srinivas...@google.com wrote:
Hi Folks
Any update on this patch? Is it acceptable?
Thanks
Balaji
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
Thanks, Balaji. Ray and/or B...
--
Hi All,
I've been experimenting with the a href=http://google-web-
toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/2.0/com/google/gwt/jsonp/client/
JsonpRequestBuilder.htmlJsonpRequestBuilder/a that comes with GWT
2.0 and it works fine when I connect to the Google calendar service
shown in docs but I'm having
When viewing our GWT application in IE 6, we've noticed some weird
behavior for the children of a DockLayoutPanel.
The width of the immediate children of the DockLayoutPanel (the ones
in north, south, east, west) gets set explicitly by GWT no matter what
you do. This only happens in IE6.
It's a
had a right margin of 20px for some reason. So I guess this is why GWT
would place style=width:180px on the TabList's element. We fixed it
by explicitly setting the right margin to 0.
On Dec 30, 4:47 pm, ryan ryanack...@gmail.com wrote:
When viewing our GWT application in IE 6, we've noticed some
EventWidget must extend Widget, and it will have to be placed in a panel
whose ultimate ancestor is either a RootPanel or a RootLayoutPanel
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:24 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
I've migrated some nice HTML/CSS code to uibinder, and would like now
, it seems to run
fine.
I suppose as a next step I could try building the HTML
programmatically, or just doing like above and slapping a big string
into place...
Any other ideas?
On Dec 13, 4:43 pm, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Thanks for the interesting use case!
I suspect you're
It's already there. Do something like:
class ParamValuesPojo {
private final String uri;
private final String token;
ParamValuesPojo(String uri, String token) {
this.uri = uri;
this.token = token;
}
public class UploaderWidgetImplIE extends UploaderWidgetImpl {
final
Thanks for the interesting use case!
I suspect you're discovering limitations in IE's innerHTML support, but
that's just a guess. The first thing to do is look at the generated
implementation of UploaderWidgetImplIE.Binder, and see if the missing bits
are missing there too.
--
Do the new docs here help at all?
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiBinderI18n.html
I'm sorry for the murkiness here, I'm a bit vague on the workings of the
-aux directory myself. @jat, do you have enough info to weigh in?
--
Joel, shouldn't we put an assert to that effect somewhere in
RootLayoutPanel? Perhaps even something more garrish, tied to asserts being
enabled: replace its body with text saying This panel will only work in
standards mode, set your doctype like so: !DOCTYPE html
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:35
VerticalPanel and HorizontalPanel are not dead yet, for exactly this reason.
But they're still table based.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
The @external mention is just the thing for that CSS page.
On Dec 2, 2009 5:59 AM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
[...@rjrjr, bobv: Is there some easy way to put plain, unobfuscated CSS rules
in a .ui.xml file?]
Yes. Declare those class selectors to be @external in the CSS block.
@external
I don't think we should thaw 2.0 for the externalized CSS file (though it's
tempting), but it would be a good add for the downloads page. Or a tool that
externalizes CSS files, similar to the one that generates java interfaces
from them.
On Dec 2, 2009 5:59 AM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
They can provide a constructor with @UiConstructor on it.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:11 AM, robertvaw...@google.com wrote:
How can custom subclasses respond to autoHide and modal attributes?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/115803
--
Does one app make heavier use of CssResource than the other? A bell is
ringing about mhtml security concerns. Or did we back out our mhtml use?
On Nov 28, 2009 7:22 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 nov, 12:29, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your
suggestion!
FWIW, this confusion is exactly why webAppCreator no longer generates
projects that use the implicit include. I wonder if we shouldn't flat out
deprecate it--in which case a warning would be the right thing.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Just to be clear:
In the case at hand, where the shared CSS file has nothing in it but @def
values, there is nothing to be gained by an approach that is any more
complicated than:
ui:style src='colors.css'
.foo { color: yellow; }
/ui:style
But if you want to share actual class definitions,
@bobv, please double check me here.
This will work, although I don't know if it will work in gwt/current or even
gwt/canary yet:
ui:style src='colors.css'
.foo { color: yellow; }
/ui:style
A ui:style element can have any number of css source files (space
separated). They'll be concatenated,
Joel, submitted this TBR you
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=6977
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Yup, thanks. And 4053?
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
If you're building incubator from source, you'll need to build GWT from
source as well. To work against GWT 1.7 please download the incubator jar.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/wiki/Downloads?tm=2
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Double bonus points if DisclosurePanel can be retrofitted with that
interface. HasHeaders?
Are you going to try to slide it into 2.0? I noticed that the new widgets
still have their this interface may change warnings--time is running out,
eh?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Henry, thanks very much for the offer. However, we're in the process of
phasing out Incubator. It's intentions are noble but the mechanism has
proven unwieldy. We're instead encouraging people to create independent
project sites on Google Code, or offer things as direct contributions to GWT
I believe I already fixed these?
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
Fixes checkstyle errors in LayoutCommand:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=6635
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for the patch, Bruce. It's is a bit more complicated than it needs to
be, though (if parent doesn't have a prefix it will never get parsed), and
still doesn't fix the confusing error message. How does the attached look?
rjrjr
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:05 AM, j...@google.com wrote:
On
Will do.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
I just committed to trunk but haven't merged to 2.0. Feel free to roll
mine back and do something better.
On Wednesday, November 4, 2009, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Thanks for the patch, Bruce. It's
SGTM
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
browser);
On 2009/11/05 00:18:55, Ray Ryan wrote:
This might be even more annoying that doing nothing. Have you checked
to see if
the text in that dialog can be copied and pasted?
You are right -- it can't be copied without doing extra work. Shall I
just leave this out and return failure
Guess you caught me ignoring those.
Please remember to merge this into releases/2.0 as well, so that
downstream merges don't get complicated.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
an overkill for this purpose. A command line option with sane defaults
is probably the way to go.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:50 PM, j...@google.com wrote:
On 2009/11/03 23:49:14, Ray Ryan wrote:
I imagine I'm not the only one who tweaks
JUnitShell.TEST_METHOD_TIMEOUT_MILLIS
when
In fact, this is the third one.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:15 PM, j...@google.com wrote:
On 2009/11/03 22:48:40, Ray Ryan wrote:
Joel, here's a quick one.
LGTM (I think it may have already sent this, but Rietveld was 500'ing
before).
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/91811
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Nathan Wells nwwe...@gmail.com wrote:
@Scott
Thanks for the insight into the discussions. Maybe this will be
something possible to add in the future, in some form.
@Bruce
I like what I see with the UIBinder methodology... However, there is
some amount of
Thanks, John. ant checkstyle didn't complain so I didn't notice. I'll
commit the patch in a moment.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:53 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
Here is a patch which fixes it.
--
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT), Google
that does this?
Nathan Wells
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Nathan Wells nwwe...@gmail.com wrote:
@Scott
Thanks for the insight into the discussions. Maybe this will be
something possible to add in the future, in some
So circular is okay?
User - UiBinder - Resources - HTTP - User
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=6631
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Joel, I submitted
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=6596 TBR
you
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Joel, if you would be so kind:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=6600
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Hey, Bruce. I TBR'd you on these:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=6550
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=6552
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
This seemed like the thing to do, TBR you:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=6554
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:29 PM, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
br...@google.com commented on revision r6550 in project google-web-toolkit.
Details are at
Dan, I submitted this TBR you:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=6555
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Todd, can you send a sample that demonstrates the problem? Also, is your
page in standards mode?
On Oct 28, 2009 5:40 AM, todd.sei...@gmail.com todd.sei...@gmail.com
wrote:
This change appear to have broken all of my scrollable content in
IE6/7. What I see now is the scroll panel with
I looked into the testing situation. It's more doable than I thought, but
will required refactoring of UiBinderWriter et al that I just don't have
time to do this week. I've noted the details for later and will submit this
as is. Because I'm a hypocrite.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:08 PM,
Can a project owner edit its home page to say so?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
LGTM!
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:45 AM, sco...@google.com wrote:
I was thinking we didn't necessarily need 4 people to review all the
same (mostly trivial) changes, so I synced up with Dan at his desk on
the few remaining items he had questions about. Do we really need more
review at this
Oh, I did get the javadoc wrong, didn't I? I'll leave it alone.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:30 PM, rj...@google.com wrote:
Thank you for this, and for your incredible patience. I'll submit it
this afternoon.
One JavaDoc nit below, which I'll address. Please say something if I'm
confused
No, we changed that last month, discussed the change on GWT-C, and updated
the Incubator wiki accordingly. This is okay.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Freeland Abbott fabb...@google.comwrote:
Grr. You're right, but it's supposed to work with *either* the trunk *or* the
most current, so
, and
trunk-tracks-many is less so.)
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
No, we changed that last month, discussed the change on GWT-C, and updated
the Incubator wiki accordingly. This is okay.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Freeland Abbott fabb...@google.comwrote
Nice sleuthing John!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
We're backing away from this change, right?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Thoka, does your code involve changes to GWT proper? If not (or if so, for
that matter), would you be willing to create a new Google Code site for it?
It doesn't have to be part of GWT proper to be useful. And there's no reason
it couldn't reach GWT proper via that route--probably more likely for
The 40+ languages situation really is unpleasant, and has lead us to devote
a lot of time to squeezing every last ounce of performance out of the
compiler. We've pitted our desire to let the compiler spend time optimizing
code against the need to get things built in a reasonable amount of time,
I'll bet a lot that the cross section of 40+ languages and nuanced
pluralized translations is vanishingly small. A first cut that simply
required status quo for plurals support would still be a big win. Or for
that matter I don't most apps would actually notice if their tiny handful of
pluralized
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:32 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
I'll bet a lot that the cross section of 40+ languages and nuanced
pluralized translations is vanishingly small. A first cut that simply
required status quo
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:20 AM, j...@google.com wrote:
On 2009/10/14 22:50:19, Ray Ryan wrote:
Here's an easy one. It logs lines like this:
[WARN] gwt:DockPanel is deprecated. Use the appropriate LayoutPanel
instead.
Is this deprecating all CellPanels, though?
Yup.
I worry a bit
First, sorry to throw something like this at you at the last second. What
was that Bruce said about getting enough sleep and making good decisions?
The other goal, which I realize know I didn't hit, was to be able to put the
stock header in one spot and the panel it opens or closes in another
Thomas, this all makes sense but I don't think we can make it happen for
2.0. Certainly not MS2, and probably not for the RC (though it's tempting,
DisclosurePanel is so close to being so much more useful). Do you mind
creating an issue on the public tracker capturing this?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009
Yes, please, please, please make this instance based. Every serious app I've
seen winds up creating its own interface to wrap around our static calls to
make them testable (and the ones on commands in particular), and it's
generally a painful retrofit. It also becomes a real difficultly for those
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:04 AM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Yes, please, please, please make this instance based. Every serious app
I've
seen winds up creating its own interface to wrap around our static calls
to
make
LGTM
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:04 AM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Yes, please, please, please make this instance based. Every serious app
I've
seen
I thank you.
Shouldn't need to edit for that, though. Did the Reply and Publish+Mail
Comments links not work?
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:57 AM, j...@google.com wrote:
On 2009/10/13 17:45:26, Ray Ryan wrote:
Why did you want to edit the issue?
Committed r6356
So I could say this: LGTM
LGTM
On Oct 11, 2009 9:00 PM, fabb...@google.com wrote:
Reviewers: Ray Ryan,
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/78807
Affected files:
build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
--- build.xml (revision 6346
BeanParser picks up things like setToken. There are very few custom parsers.
On Oct 11, 2009 3:29 PM, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Comment by sami.jaber:
Yes, that what I thought initially but as the attribute setToken() doesn't
exist neither in the Hyperlink user.ui class, I suspected
HTMLPanel handles this case just fine. (See HTMLPanelTest.) But yes,
UiBinder probably doesn't. I suppose it could do the same trick HTMLPanel
does--you mind filing an issue?
But allocating a widget per row isn't a great plan anyway, it won't scale.
UiBinder is not a renderer--it's for laying out
I can review today. The redundant code is in
com.google.gwt.uibinder.rebind.CssResourceWriter.
Perhaps I'm wrong to be dismissive of Keith's concerns--we're aiming at
different audiences. He's' generating source that people will work with
directly, I'm generating source that will only be accessed
Do you have similar handling of dashes?
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Keith Platfoot kplatf...@google.com wrote:
Perhaps I'm wrong to be dismissive of Keith's concerns--we're aiming at
different audiences. He's' generating source that people will work with
directly, I'm generating source
Not a bug. You're in charge of MyExternalBundle, including injecting it.
Note that there is no relationship between the bundle generated for the
ui:style block and your MyExternalBundle instance.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Sami Jaber sami.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi gwitters,
Before
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:16 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
I've attached a very simple implementation (with source) of an
IdResource that can be used with ClientBundle. You're welcome to
adapt it to your needs, but
Each of these should really be a comment in the source code, no?
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:33 PM, j...@google.com wrote:
A few comments to make it a bit clearer what this is all about.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/76803/diff/1/2
File
Oh, yes, should have said that in the original review. John, that's very
typical builder behavior.
On Oct 4, 2009 3:09 PM, Miroslav Pokorny miroslav.poko...@gmail.com
wrote:
What about returning this from all void methods so one can chain method
calls?
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:13 AM,
I don't suppose there is an existing scala - java source translator?
On Oct 2, 2009 7:04 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
2009/10/1 Maxime Lévesque maxime.leves...@gmail.com
Has there ever been discussions about supporting scala ?
There have been some water cooler discussions about
IMHO if they're legal, who cares about the conventions? These aren't
really conventional interfaces.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:25 PM, kplatf...@google.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/72808/diff/1/2
File user/src/com/google/gwt/resources/css/InterfaceGenerator.java
(right):
Do you need to update your tools dir?
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:46 PM, P.G.Taboada pgtabo...@googlemail.com wrote:
Since the new Mail Sample was commited I can't do a full build.
Am I missing something?
brgds,
Papick G. Taboada
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Does MS1 need this patch? (Hint: no.)
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:17 AM, jlaba...@google.com wrote:
@freeland - this patch also removes RunStyle.init(), which was added as
part of the JUnitShell change but isn't actually needed.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/72807
Please forward this to GWT announce, and cc skybrian
On Friday, September 25, 2009, John LaBanca jlaba...@google.com wrote:
If you override JUnitShell.Strategy, you should consider this email.
JUnitShell.Strategy,
which determines how GWT modules are compiled for test cases, is
currently
Committed r6219
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Since the logic hasn't changed, I'll take your LGTM and run with it.
FYI, this is an object we plug in to the XML parser. It gets to turn URLs
into streams. When it sees us serving from the magic url where our
Hi,
I have a Flow Panel which is of a fixed size.
I am trying to place panels of a fixed size inside this Flow Panel.
I would like to to place these panels horizontally inside the Flow
Panel.
But as soon the width of the flow panel is reached I would like to
wrap the next set of panels to the
That's a flat out bug. Would you mind putting something on the issue
tracker?
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Sripathi Krishnan
sripathi.krish...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a custom widget which has a constructor with some fields.
class HelpWidget extends Composite {
//usual interface
Committed at r6188
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:09 AM, j...@google.com wrote:
On 2009/09/22 00:28:46, Ray Ryan wrote:
Joel, can you review this small change that will probably make biggish
ripples
in your world? Since html uses src all over the place, we should too.
Agreed. LGTM.
http
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:23 PM, j...@google.com wrote:
On 2009/09/22 18:59:16, Ray Ryan wrote:
I'm still reviewing, but I thought I should get this AttributeParser
issue in
front of you early.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/68805/diff/1/24
File
user/src/com/google/gwt
601 - 700 of 894 matches
Mail list logo
