Stefano,
- move 'harmonytest.org' source code in the harmony svn repository so
that others can work on it
What's the procedure for this? Certificate of origin, etc? Is the code
scan required before that? I can create a JIRA with the sources
attached but the problem is they're changed often.
What's the procedure for this? Certificate of origin, etc? Is the code
scan required before that? I can create a JIRA with the sources
attached but the problem is they're changed often.
Антоха, я могу ошибаться, но вроде бы COO и код скан - это такие внутренние
Интеловские прибамбасы. :)
Folks,
I'm awfully sorry, that should have been personal letter. If you don't
understand Russian just ignore it. If you understand it please ignore it too.
My favorite mistake to Reply to the mailing list and not change the recipient.
:)
Thanks,
Alex.
-Original Message-
From:
Good progress.
pat on back/
Regards,
Tim
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
We now have DRLVM+Classlib cleanly building out of SVN and able to run
basic programs on Ubuntu 6 on an em64T box.
$ uname -a :
Linux harmony-em64t 2.6.15-27-amd64-generic #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Sep 16
01:50:50 UTC 2006
Anton Luht wrote:
Stefano,
- move 'harmonytest.org' source code in the harmony svn repository so
that others can work on it
What's the procedure for this? Certificate of origin, etc? Is the code
scan required before that? I can create a JIRA with the sources
attached but the problem is
For the first notification: sometimes it happens :( Usually, the second run
helps.
For the second, I need more information. I never saw it before.
Could you rerun it?
Thanks, Vladimir
On 11/16/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vladimir,
I've applied the latest patch from
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
We are doing this to conform to some convention, right? If the
covention for jvm.dll is a standard invocation API, why would we also
bundle in the harmony-specific VMI API?
No, take a look at the exports from a jvm.dll, it is the standard
invocation API + vm-specific
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Plans for the future include:
1) add a chart for the number of subscribers to the various lists (I
already have a script for this, but I need somebody with apmail karma to
run it on the apache machine that handles our mail)
2) add a chart for email traffic
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
from the admin section?
No, the notice is in here [1], in the section Export Notice. It is
predominantly boilerplate text.
The readme in the admin section is for 'us' harmony types to show why
that bis file is there, and record the e-mail sent to Uncle Sam.
[1]
Seems, I was over-optimistic :(
To test notifications I add my email together with '
[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and broke ws. But I received only 1
notification and seems it was for my address only.
Any ideas?
Now I try to run it with notification from my gmail address.
Thanks, Vlaidmir
:))
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 12:07 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [general] Harmony Todo list
Orlov, Alexander M wrote:
Folks,
I'm awfully sorry, that should have been personal
Just FYI: I was able to build Classlib + DRLVM on SLES 9 64-bit. The only
difficulty was to build libjpeg, libpng and liblcms manually, otherwise
everything went fine.
$ uname -a
Linux xx 2.6.5-7.191-smp #1 SMP Tue Jun 28 14:58:56 UTC 2005 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ ./java -version
Hi Vladimir,
It seems everybody likes this approach. In that case, I have another
idea for exclude lists. Can't we go further and extend the current
exclude list functionality a bit more? And forget about TestNG and
friends for a while I mean.
For example, we can put exclude lists into
On 11/17/06, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems, I was over-optimistic :(
To test notifications I add my email together with '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
and broke ws. But I received only 1 notification and seems it was for my
address only.
Any ideas?
Now I try to run it with
Thanks for the review Tim. I'm going to file non-bug JIRA if no one objects.
Regards,
2006/11/17, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looks like an RI bug to me. I'd expect it to return the property:
public String[] getProp1()
public void setProp1(String[] val)
Regards,
Tim
Alexei
Alexei,
Metric is simply the number of Doxygen warnings for file. Sorry for
not mentioning this in my letter.
If some file doesn't have Doxygen comments at all then metric can show
only one problem, like in your examples:
vm/gc_cc/src/timer.h:27: Warning: Compound Timer is not documented.
Alexei already mentioned this peculiarities:
# If WARN_IF_UNDOCUMENTED is set to YES, then doxygen will generate warnings
# for undocumented members. If EXTRACT_ALL is set to YES then this flag will
# automatically be disabled.
Thanks,
Andrey
On 11/16/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you think we can add RED ALERT to the files that have only one
warning - not documented? I'd say such files should be addressed in the
first place
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Yakushev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 1:23 PM
To:
Hi,
It is interesting question. What are advantages of such serialization
model? IMHO majority of Java classes in the world have static fields.
:-) What are usage patterns of this class?
Thanks,
2006/11/16, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/13/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the 0x224 day of Apache Harmony Alex Astapchuk wrote:
Hi Egor,
Thanks for your reply. Please, find my answers inlined.
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x222 day of Apache Harmony Alex Astapchuk wrote:
Hi all,
Among other things listed on the JIT Dev tasks, there is a need for
calling
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think that it's totally unreasonable to have no upper bound on stack
size. A Java virtual machine should never be able to hose a machine by
sucking in all memory...
yeah, like those rotten C programs. You are damned if you do and damned
if you don't, since you'll
Can we get the value from the harmonyvm.properties file?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/11/17, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think that it's totally unreasonable to have no upper bound on stack
size. A Java virtual machine should never be able to hose a machine by
On 11/17/06, Alexei Zakharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It is interesting question. What are advantages of such serialization
model?
I dunno, but the spec maker knows. :)
IMHO majority of Java classes in the world have static fields.
:-) What are usage patterns of this class?
Thanks,
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Can we get the value from the harmonyvm.properties file?
I think the question is what default value should you choose? I believe
we all agree that it should be configurable, at launch time (e.g. -Xss
-Xmso), and yes at install time maybe in the .properties file.
Regards,
Nope sorry -- all tests are passing for me on WinXP/IBM VME.
Regards,
Tim
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
Folks,
Has anyone seen the following problem in the whole test run? I cannot
reproduce the problem for standalone test. (SuSE 9)
testcase
+1
Intelovskiye is just the exact spelling of the russian
pronunciation. It is interesting how it translates this back to
Russian. :-D
17.11.06, Mikhail Loenko[EMAIL PROTECTED] написал(а):
LOL
17.11.06, Tim Ellison[EMAIL PROTECTED] написал(а):
Orlov, Alexander M wrote:
Folks,
I'm
I had a quick browse through the Harmony SVN and spotted what appears to
be a vulnerability in the java.lang.ThreadLocal implementation. I have
briefly discussed this with Tim Ellison and Geir Magnusson Jr., off list
before posting here.
Harmony uses a per Thread HashMap (WeakHashMap in
Stefano,
thank you for pointing peroformance issues out!
Although that was a debug build, it uncovers that Harmony is not
properly tuned for FP-intensive workloads as SciMark. One of the
possible reasons of this (known:) limitation is also raised in the
thread [drlvm][jit][ia-32]register-based
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
2) add a chart for email traffic
GMane has a chart for harmony traffic:
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.harmony.devel
Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote:
Currently Harmony has pack all its source files into jars and put
them in deploy\jdk\jre\lib\boot, e.g, luni-src.jar, nio-src.jar, etc(I
don't know when this happens, however they are here now).
That's been done for a while.
In most cases it does not disturb any
Issue 2197 was updated to exclude test by the simplest way (very simple
exclude files).
The next step will be looking through the issue 263. I'll try it.
It will fine if somebody take care about issue 2197 (exclude files for
win/lnx on x86 for IBM and DRl VMs).
Thanks, Vladimir
On
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
2) add a chart for email traffic
GMane has a chart for harmony traffic:
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.harmony.devel
Boy, I wish my portfolio chart looked like that! :-)
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java
Thomas Hawtin wrote:
I had a quick browse through the Harmony SVN and spotted what appears to
be a vulnerability in the java.lang.ThreadLocal implementation. I have
briefly discussed this with Tim Ellison and Geir Magnusson Jr., off list
before posting here.
Yep, and I'll say again publicly,
Natalya,
Thanks for the proposal.
I think you should start with opening a new JIRA issue, copy the description
of the optimization there and submit some micro-benchmarks showing the
headroom for optimization. Later we'll use this JIRA for discussng code
patches.
One question:
-
that's not half as fun as people setting their mailer to change the
reply-to: to the list and then sending personal mail...
;)
geir
Orlov, Alexander M wrote:
Folks,
I'm awfully sorry, that should have been personal letter. If you don't understand Russian just ignore it. If you understand
Anton Luht wrote:
Stefano,
- move 'harmonytest.org' source code in the harmony svn repository so
that others can work on it
What's the procedure for this? Certificate of origin, etc? Is the code
scan required before that? I can create a JIRA with the sources
attached but the problem is
Evgueni Brevnov wrote:
In other words we will observe the crash as we do now if sem_wait
completes unsuccessfully for whatever reason...
Well it shouldn't return an error except for signal, shouldn't it? Two
possible other errors are EINVAL and EDEADLK which should never happen.
Maybe we
Don't pat my back. Stefano and Gregory hammered through some of the
latest cruft - I just followed the email thread and formalized and
committed the changes.
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
Good progress.
pat on back/
Regards,
Tim
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
We now have DRLVM+Classlib cleanly
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
Just FYI: I was able to build Classlib + DRLVM on SLES 9 64-bit. The only
difficulty was to build libjpeg, libpng and liblcms manually, otherwise
everything went fine.
why manually?
$ uname -a
Linux xx 2.6.5-7.191-smp #1 SMP Tue Jun 28 14:58:56 UTC 2005
Pavel Afremov wrote:
Hi.
On my EM64T machines wit SuSE 9 and SuSE 10 I can't reproduce crash.
StackTest and FinalizerStackTest return FAILED status.
Frankly speaking any tests crashed VM on my EM64T machine without unset
JAVA_HOME. With unset all tests work, but .as I said StackTest
On 11/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
Just FYI: I was able to build Classlib + DRLVM on SLES 9 64-bit. The
only
difficulty was to build libjpeg, libpng and liblcms manually, otherwise
everything went fine.
why manually?
My system does not have
Here's the instructions I had ready for the website, but got clobbered
with one of the many doco patches. I'll put on website today in terms
of requirement, and then point to a wiki for details for this platform.
1) Install subversion, gcc, g++ and make:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get
Who wrote it?
The code? Me.
(actually, I think we should host the harmony
testing in our own zone and avoid depending on Alexey's own resources,
but there is no hurry for that).
Yes, that'd be great. Fitting it to hosting that is more suitable for
home pages is a pain in the brain.
My thinking is that we should support the convention, but we're also
trying to create another convention with VMI.
Would the vmi.dll be usable by other implementors?
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
We are doing this to conform to some convention, right? If the
covention
thank you. I'm happy.
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
from the admin section?
No, the notice is in here [1], in the section Export Notice. It is
predominantly boilerplate text.
The readme in the admin section is for 'us' harmony types to show why
that bis file is there,
the [EMAIL PROTECTED] did go through, I think. That has been added as an
allow.
Can you try again?
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 11/17/06, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems, I was over-optimistic :(
To test notifications I add my email together with
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
and
Tim Ellison wrote:
Before you go off writing more code, just take a moment to look at
HARMONY-263 and tell us what you think of it.
It ties us to JUnit. Doesn't moving the exclude list upwards give us
more freedom?
geir
Thanks
Tim
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
It seems
isn't there a package manager that will let you fetch liblcms?
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
On 11/17/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
Just FYI: I was able to build Classlib + DRLVM on SLES 9 64-bit.
The only
All alone? Then as long as your employer doesn't consider it a work
for hire - IOW, if Intel doesn't think that they paid you to do this -
then you can contribute it yourself.
Please check with your manager.
If that is ok, then you can submit as a JIRA and as Tim noted, we'll put
in
I spoke too soon - do you mean reusing the code for managing the exclude
lists?
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Before you go off writing more code, just take a moment to look at
HARMONY-263 and tell us what you think of it.
It ties us to JUnit. Doesn't moving the
You know someone is going to spin this... see, they even do all their
development discussion in Russian...
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
Вы можете пойти здесь http://babelfish.altavista.com/. Будет сериями
потехи! Как наблюдать рыбу те велосипед. :-)
Time to get back to the code me thinks.
Tim
Tim Ellison wrote:
Thomas Hawtin wrote:
Some modern code,
such as I believe Spring, creates many ThreadLocal instances, so you may
wish to look further at quality of implementation issues.
Ack -- thanks. What do you call many? 100's? 1,000s? more?
Good question. Googling tends to just
I grok this. I have no problem.
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
Thomas Hawtin wrote:
I had a quick browse through the Harmony SVN and spotted what appears to
be a vulnerability in the java.lang.ThreadLocal implementation. I have
briefly discussed this with Tim Ellison and Geir Magnusson Jr., off
On 11/16/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Elena Semukhina wrote:
As Gregory mentioned ThreadTest.testJoinlongint() failure he observed
yesterday, I filed a http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2204
issue
for that. I saw this failure quite long ago but cannot reproduce
My CC report a problem in the drlvm module. Could somebody reproduce/ fix
it?
Thanks, Vladimir
[exec] compile-jvmti-tests-native:
[exec] [echo] ## Compiling JVMTI natives in:
C:\harm_cc\buildtest\trunk\cc\projects\drlvm\trunk\vm\tests\jvmti\VMInit1
[exec][cc] 1 total
On 11/17/06, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
For the first notification: sometimes it happens :( Usually, the second
run
helps.
For the second, I need more information. I never saw it before.
Could you rerun it?
I rerun it but it didn't helped. It seems that CC does nothing - no email
notifications.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
My thinking is that we should support the convention, but we're also
trying to create another convention with VMI.
Would the vmi.dll be usable by other implementors?
Not really, since implementers have to hold on to our VMI function
struct from the JavaVM / JNIEnv,
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think that it's totally unreasonable to have no upper bound on stack
size. A Java virtual machine should never be able to hose a machine by
sucking in all memory...
yeah, like those rotten C programs. You are damned if you do and damned
if
On 11/17/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/17/06, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
For the first notification: sometimes it happens :( Usually, the second
run
helps.
For the second, I need more information. I never saw it before.
Could you rerun it?
I rerun it but it didn't
Hmm no I cannot reproduce it. Did you build the VM? Does directory
build/win_ia32_msvc_debug/deploy/jre/include exist and does it contain
include files?
In jvmti.test.xml the include path is constructed like this
${build.deploy.dir}/include. So either it doesn't exist, or
build.deploy.dir
On 11/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the [EMAIL PROTECTED] did go through, I think. That has been added as an
allow.
Can you try again?
Seems, nothing was changed :( I received it 13 minutes ago but don't see
anything on harmony-commits.
**
*From:*
Elena Semukhina wrote:
On 11/16/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Elena Semukhina wrote:
As Gregory mentioned ThreadTest.testJoinlongint() failure he observed
yesterday, I filed a http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2204
issue
for that. I saw this failure quite long
ok...
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
My thinking is that we should support the convention, but we're also
trying to create another convention with VMI.
Would the vmi.dll be usable by other implementors?
Not really, since implementers have to hold on to our VMI function
struct
Hm. Ok - I just sent my own test. I do have it allowed. I'll try to
get this to work myself as spoofing from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and see how it
works out...
geir
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 11/17/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the [EMAIL
On 11/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
isn't there a package manager that will let you fetch liblcms?
I'm not root there so it was faster to me to build library from src.
Thanks,
Pavel
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
On 11/17/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/17/06, Pavel Ozhdikhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
isn't there a package manager that will let you fetch liblcms?
I'm not root there so it was faster to me to build library from src.
And, the file depends/libs/build/README.txt
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
You know someone is going to spin this... see, they even do all their
development discussion in Russian...
lol
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
Вы можете пойти здесь http://babelfish.altavista.com/. Будет сериями
потехи! Как наблюдать рыбу те велосипед. :-)
Time to
Anton Luht wrote:
Stefano,
- move 'harmonytest.org' source code in the harmony svn repository so
that others can work on it
What's the procedure for this? Certificate of origin, etc? Is the code
scan required before that? I can create a JIRA with the sources
attached but the problem is
On 11/17/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Elena Semukhina wrote:
On 11/16/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Elena Semukhina wrote:
As Gregory mentioned ThreadTest.testJoinlongint() failure he observed
yesterday, I filed a
On 11/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yah, I get failed status too. Because the VM segfaults. Try running
StackTest via
./java StackTest
and what do you see? Oh, reading more...
It's output on my SuSEs
befor my changes:
$
Вы можете пойти здесь http://babelfish.altavista.com/. Будет сериями
потехи! Как наблюдать рыбу те велосипед. :-)
He bought the English-Russian dictionary and studied the
English-Russian language... :-)
Yes, back to work.
Regards,
17.11.06, Stefano Mazzocchi[EMAIL PROTECTED] написал(а):
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
Stefano,
It is a bit unfair to compare *debug* build of Harmony with other
release versions :)
I'm simulating what a journalist with a developer could do.
If there is a way to make it compile in 'release mode' (if such a thing
exists), I'll be very glad to redo the
Sergey,
It is ok to have not thread safe code in AWT implementation which can
work incorrectly in some cases. It is not ok (IMHO) if the incorrect
work leads to VM crash. It can be problem as a security hole.
--
Best regards,
Ivan
On 11/17/06, Sergey Soldatov (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
Stefano,
It is a bit unfair to compare *debug* build of Harmony with other
release versions :)
I'm simulating what a journalist with a developer could do.
Our snapshots are built in release mode.
If there is a way to make it compile in
Egor Pasko wrote:
Stefano,
thank you for pointing peroformance issues out!
you're welcome, but I have to warn you, I've barely started... you might
get sick of my performance regression charts in the future ;-)
Although that was a debug build, it uncovers that Harmony is not
properly tuned
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Here's the instructions I had ready for the website, but got clobbered
with one of the many doco patches. I'll put on website today in terms
of requirement, and then point to a wiki for details for this platform.
1) Install subversion, gcc, g++ and make:
[EMAIL
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Here's the instructions I had ready for the website, but got clobbered
with one of the many doco patches. I'll put on website today in terms
of requirement, and then point to a wiki for details for this platform.
1) Install subversion, gcc,
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Here's the instructions I had ready for the website, but got clobbered
with one of the many doco patches. I'll put on website today in terms
of requirement, and then point to a wiki for details for this platform.
1) Install subversion, gcc,
Elena Semukhina wrote:
On 11/17/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Elena Semukhina wrote:
On 11/16/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Elena Semukhina wrote:
As Gregory mentioned ThreadTest.testJoinlongint() failure he
observed
yesterday, I filed a
remember, we have a page on the website that details this. The stuff
you see below is just for config... these were my notes, so the stuff at
the end should be removed...
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Here's the instructions I had ready for
I put a wiki page up :
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Automated_Testing
(reachable from the front page) to capture how we track and govern the
community CI effort that build-test is intended to be.
So I didn't set out any rules other than someone who's interested has to
approach the
I put the notes I made on doing ubuntu 6 on a wiki page
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/DevelopmentPlatformConfiguration
Please provide details for other platforms if you have them.
geir
Hi,
Sadly, I still run or debug any of this yet. But my suggestion and
request would be that we commit Pavel's patch 2224 which for now disables
the overfow tests on EM64T. That would give us some time to understand and
debug the problem. We are good on 32 bit.
The bottom line is that the
I'm happy to disable tests.
I was disappointed in 2224 - I assumed that it was an external exclude
list :)
But I guess that works. How do we exclude for more than 1 platform?
geir
Rana Dasgupta wrote:
Hi,
Sadly, I still run or debug any of this yet. But my suggestion and
request would
I was hoping you wouldn't say that.
Time to modify the DRLVM build for testing.
sob
geir
Pavel Afremov wrote:
On 11/17/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm happy to disable tests.
I was disappointed in 2224 - I assumed that it was an
I think
/**
*
* @keyword X_Windows_bug X_Linux_bug
*
*/
would do itat least seems to do it for me
On 11/17/06, Pavel Afremov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm happy to disable tests.
I was disappointed in 2224 - I assumed that it
I've built a 'release' version of Harmony and I'm incorporating the new
results in the previous runs.
--
harmony-debug
-
Apache Harmony Launcher : (c) Copyright 1991, 2006 The Apache Software
Foundation or its
I'll throw up a wiki page on this, but here's where we are now. I
committed H-2224, which excluded stack tests on x86_64 (and LOS on windows)
c-unit tests : pass
smoke : pass (now that stack related are not run...)
kernel :
w/ jet
[junit] Test java.lang.ClassAnnotationsTest FAILED
On Saturday 18 November 2006 00:22 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I'll throw up a wiki page on this, but here's where we are now. I
committed H-2224, which excluded stack tests on x86_64 (and LOS on windows)
c-unit tests : pass
smoke : pass (now that stack related are not run...)
kernel :
89 matches
Mail list logo
