On Fri 06-Jun-2014 at 16:29 -0700, David Horman wrote:
I wasn't considering fusing stacks or anything that advanced. What
is the suggested procedure if I just want a blended, single-file
output panorama with no exposure correction from a basic mosaic of
images? It seems to me that none of
On Jun 6, 2014 11:52 AM, davidhorma...@gmail.com wrote:
Why does Hugin include No exposure correction, low dynamic range among
the Remapped images options, but it doesn't have a related no-exposure
entry under Panorama Outputs?
Hugin undoes any exposure correction before fusing stacks with
On Jun 5, 2014 2:35 PM, Johannes Wienke wrote:
Is there any known (command line) utility to blow up the cropped TIFFs to
full ones again?
There is a tool in libpano13 called PTuncrop, you should already have it as
part of your Hugin installation.
--
Bruno
--
A list of frequently asked
, Matthieu Desile, Bruno Postle, dcb, Stefan
Peter, Terry Duell, Timothee Groleau and Thomas Modes.
SHA1SUM: 85d8d94c96780fa5b6df2c2e4929f8d20557f128 libpano13-2.9.19.tar.gz
This release is equivalent to HG 826:7339b1014e88
Here is the full ChangeLog since 2.9.18 for more details:
2014-02-12 17:57
On 6 May 2014 07:06, Emad ud din Bhatt xyzt...@gmail.com wrote:
I am facing this very strange image behaviour in Hugin. Some part of my
images is stretched strangely across equirect. Please! See attachment and
help.
Is this just in the Preview window? or do you have the same problem
with
On 6 May 2014 09:20, paul womack pwom...@papermule.co.uk wrote:
I am about to visit a record office. Their rules
permit cameras, but not tripods (let alone pano heads!)
I wish to capture the image of some 18th c maps, which are large,
in good detail. The obvious strategy is to take multiple
On 28 April 2014 10:24, paul womack wrote:
On this particular map, some of the tiles have borders,
which I am attempting to remove using Hugin's
crop/mask features.
Yes, masking in Hugin isn't very useful where there are tiny overlaps.
Enblend also probably isn't appropriate for this sort of
])
* math.c:
Fixes condition introduced in last commit (Matthew Petroff)
2014-02-12 14:38 +1100 tduell tduell (5db9915fc7d0)
* math.c:
use default atanh function for MSVC 2012+ (Matthew Petroff)
2014-01-06 23:00 + Bruno Postle br...@postle.net (bced6574df70
On Thu 10-Apr-2014 at 18:03 +0200, Torsten Bronger wrote:
Some of you will probably have .ini files (or something equivalent)
with the distortion data of your favourite panorama lenses. It
would be highly appreciated if you provided this data to the
http://lensfun.sourceforge.net/ project.
I
On 3 April 2014 11:55, Torsten Bronger bron...@physik.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
The a, b c parameters shift pixels radially, so pixels at the
sides of a landscape format photo will move. For example a 50°
landscape photo will occupy 50° of the output panorama; but if you
change a, b or c then
On 2 Apr 2014 15:03, Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola) wrote:
I want to make a script, ideally to be used in windows and linux, to auto
generate a Salado Player and VR5 publication of a given erect image. I
wonder if entile, from Panotools::Script or any other already done
script/tool can
On 26 Mar 2014 06:41, Torsten Bronger wrote:
If I understand the Hugin projection model correctly, the distance
of a pixel from the image centre r (in real-world coordinates),
depending of the angle of the incoming light ray with respect to the
optical axis, is
r(alpha) = f * (a*r^3 + b*r^2
On Mar 25, 2014 11:58 AM, Scottio wrote:
I'm pulling my hair out with this front end GUI. I have used the same
len's with Hugin and PTGui and Hugin doesn't seem to get the wrap correct.
What am I doing wrong here?
Note that for circular fisheye photos hugin uses a different model to
ptgui; both
On 10 March 2014 13:46, Yuv goo...@levy.ch wrote:
On an exceptional weekend, instead of studying I went skiing. Long story
short, four commands on the command line and about one hour (I did not time
the process and I did not attend it) later:
http://vimeo.com/88614631
The question is:
On 8 Mar 2014 08:37, T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de wrote:
So a new gpano2pto script (in the Panotools::Script Mercurial repository
on Sourceforge) reads the GPano XMP tags in the photosphere panorama,
figures out the correct field of view and vertical shift, and writes a
Hugin .pto project that
On 8 Mar 2014 09:19, Aaron F. Ross aa...@digitalartsguild.com wrote:
I import some HDR files, lay them out and they are more or less fine.
I try to export through the Stitcher, and low dynamic range output is
sort of working, except the hottest parts of the image are massively
clipped off. I
On 3 March 2014 10:25, Torsten Bronger torsten.bron...@gmail.com wrote:
How is the FOV lens parameter in Hugin defined? Always the
horizontal axis, always the longer axis, always the shorter axis?
Always horizontal, this is inherited from the panotools lens model.
--
Bruno
--
A list of
Android 4.2+ devices have a photosphere shooting mode as well as an
immersive viewer. The viewer is ok, but since I haven't yet managed to
create a full spherical 'photosphere' without horrible stitching errors the
spherical shooting mode hasn't been much use.
The photosphere mode does however do
On Sat 01-Mar-2014 at 01:58 -0800, Brandan wrote:
I am needing to make my panos into cubes. To do that I discovered panotools
and erect2cubic. I did one pano from the command line and it worked great.
The end user though is going to be a friend on a MAC who has almost no
computer knowledge and
On 25 Feb 2014 09:51, Paperaussie wrote:
Is anybody else experiencing nadir problems with the latest version? I
typically patch a handheld nadir over the tripod nadir.
I found that this version cuts off my handheld nadir after optimisation.
In its correct location at the bottom of the image,
On Feb 20, 2014 12:46 AM, Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho wrote:
I was thinking about trying autopano-sift-c, but would have to install it
and it's requisites, like mono, so I didn't do it yet.
autopano-sift-c doesn't depend on mono, in fact it is very straightforward
to build. The original
On Feb 11, 2014 3:29 AM, Terry Duell wrote:
To finalise the addition of appdata for Hugin, I created a
screenshots/appdata dir in my local hugin-web repo, and added Cristian's
screenshots.
I note that (now a few days later) my commit has failed to show up on
sourceforge, the repo still being
On Tue 11-Feb-2014 at 09:34 +, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Feb 11, 2014 3:29 AM, Terry Duell wrote:
To finalise the addition of appdata for Hugin, I created a
screenshots/appdata dir in my local hugin-web repo, and added
Cristian's screenshots.
I note that (now a few days later) my
On Wed 12-Feb-2014 at 09:45 +1100, Terry Duell wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:11:00 +1100, Matthew Petroff wrote:
Attached is a small patch for libpano13 that uses the default atanh
function for MSVC 2012+ instead of the bundled version. It fixes shared
library compilation on MSVC 2013. Could
On Tue 04-Feb-2014 at 23:49 -0800, Raghavendra Kopalle wrote:
New to the community here. I am trying to setup Hugin on AWS or
any other cloud infrastructure. Is it viable to setup Hugin this
way, I am interested in a single body+lens+shooting pattern to
begin with. Can I create a template
On Sun 09-Feb-2014 at 07:21 -0800, Michele Verda wrote:
My idea was to pass this PTO file to the Raspberry and execute it always
exactly in the same way using the command hugin_stitch_project.
hugin_stitch_project is a GUI tool, you can stitch on the
command-line with `pto2mk` and `make`.
On Feb 3, 2014 9:28 AM, Naked Robot 360cit...@gmail.com wrote:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.myboyfriendisageek.panostitch
this is a port of hugin, right?
No idea.
how can they charge money for it?
where is the source code?
In general people are allowed to charge for
This is an interesting paper from last year, claims to have a better
replacement for the Pannini projection (great name too):
http://www.cv-foundation.org/openaccess/content_iccv_2013/papers/Chang_Rectangling_Stereographic_Projection_2013_ICCV_paper.pdf
--
Bruno
--
A list of frequently asked
I thought I might find the time to do this, but it is a simple
non-programming task so anyone on the list could do it. Basically
Hugin needs an AppData file to be used in appstore type tools on
Linux.
Actually it needs three: one for 'Hugin Panorama Creator', one for
'Hugin Batch Processor'
On Sun 05-Jan-2014 at 19:37 +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
Until now enblend was working and was compilable.
The actual version in trunk requires LCMS_VERSION be = 2050.
Is this really needed? On my system (ubuntu 12.10) it is 2020.
/usr/src/enblend/enblend-code/src/enblend.cc:67:2: Fehler:
On Thu 19-Dec-2013 at 00:35 +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
Didn’t know that. Since I compile from local source repo, I never
felt the need to have source package. It is sooo easy to create
and use binary package for debian and red hat. But we need some
good way to distribute source too, so any
Watters,
Kornel Benko, Matthieu Desile, Bruno Postle, dcb, Stefan Peter, Terry Duell,
Timothee Groleau and Thomas Modes.
It's an anniversary too! It is ten years since this library was put into
Sourceforge CVS combining all known patch sets. Since this is also when
PToptimizer.c was reconstructed
On Tue 17-Dec-2013 at 19:05 +, Bruno Postle wrote:
libpano13 is the PanoTools library for panoramic imaging.
A libpano13-2.9.19 beta1 tarball has been uploaded to sourceforge, this is
for testing but is expected to be very similar to the final release:
https://sourceforge.net/projects
On Tue 10-Dec-2013 at 18:56 +0100, Johannes Wienke wrote:
This is what I get for a panorama with crop applied in hugin. What is
the important aspect? I can't see it.
Image Width: 2969 Image Length: 2769
Resolution: 150, 150 pixels/inch
Position: 29.8667, 7.6
The offset position is
On Sun 08-Dec-2013 at 11:12 -0800, Johannes Wienke wrote:
if I stitch a panorama with Hugin, the FOV is automatically
calculated and inserted into the image exif data. However, it
seems this does not reflect the crop chosen inside hugin. Is there
a chance to get the numbers for the selected
On Sun 08-Dec-2013 at 23:42 +0100, Johannes Wienke wrote:
On 08.12.13 23:26 schrieb Bruno Postle:
There is a reason for this, the default TIFF output is the full size of
the canvas, the cropped area just represents the part of the canvas that
has visible data. JPEG doesn't support the offset
On 1 Dec 2013 10:59, Laurent laurent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
I took 2 pictures using exposure bracketing on my camera, with identical
framing.
In hugin I just added the pictures, aligned them (they align very well),
then clicked Create Panorama but I get a white halo in the middle of the
image:
On 21 November 2013 14:48, paul womack wrote:
Bruno Postle wrote:
You could ask Ubuntu to fix the bug, the workaround is a simple one-line
patch for enblend. Usually you can get a fast response from a distribution
with this sort of thing, and the fix benefits all the other users too.
I'd
On 20 November 2013 09:42, paul womack pwom...@papermule.co.uk wrote:
Since I prefer to stay on distributed binaries, I'll simply export as TIFF
and post-convert to JPEG to work round this fault.
You could ask Ubuntu to fix the bug, the workaround is a simple one-line
patch for enblend.
On 20 November 2013 09:28, Ala Maison sys.alamai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 6:10:13 PM UTC+1, Ala Maison wrote:
I'm trying to install this software on CentOS6 and i can't do it :/ Many
dependencies missing.
Libpano13 seems to be causing a lot of problems as well as
On 18 November 2013 11:00, paul womack pwom...@papermule.co.uk wrote:
(short version; the attached image was generated by Hugin
on Ubuntu 13.10 but isn't readable by Eye of Gnome on Ubuntu 13.10)
I first encountered this with files made by Hugin 2011.4.0 but the version
that (actually) ships
On 16 Nov 2013 09:49, Daniel Jensen dmjens...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm doing some exposure fusing and am confused about how to set output
exposure. I don't want the exposure to be the mean of the blended images'
exposures- on average they're underexposed.
In the preview window, if photometrics is
On 13 November 2013 22:05, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com wrote:
I just changed it. There is something entirely wrong with sourceforge's
publishing mechanism.
I already made more changes and only yesterday I found out that you have
to update both the default branch of hugin-web as well
On 14 November 2013 15:44, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com wrote:
When writing and committing the texts for the release I had hg pushed it
to the default hg-web. After 8 hours still nothing had happened. So I
checked the mercurial view on sourceforge for the website (
On 13 November 2013 09:18, Raphael Le Boursicaud
leboursicaudraph...@gmail.com wrote:
Working in an hydraulic lab, I've been using align_image_stack for a
project aiming at measuring rivers discharge from images.
Align_image_stack give me great results, now I would like to understand
how it
On Wed 13-Nov-2013 at 11:46 -0800, paolobenve wrote:
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/releases/2013.0.0/en.shtml has still the title
of 2012.0.0
Maybe somebody can solve this, I fixed this in the default branch a few days
ago:
On Wed 13-Nov-2013 at 13:11 -0800, Thomas Modes wrote:
Tried to fix.
On Wed 13-Nov-2013 at 11:46 -0800, paolobenve wrote:
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/releases/2013.0.0/en.shtml has still the
title of 2012.0.0
Thanks, seems to be ok now.
--
Bruno
--
A list of frequently asked questions is
Hugin 2013.0.0 and enblend 4.1.2 are in the imminent Fedora 20 release
(beta installers out today!), for i386, x86_64 and arm64.
I haven't yet updated the panorama Fedora rpm repository, but the most
recent Hugin snapshot there should be identical. Note to anyone subscribed
to this repository, it
On 6 November 2013 01:01, Terry Duell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I tried stitching your 0007 and 0008.tif in hugin-2013.1.0 (development
source) and they stitched OK using your .pto, but the result, when
displayed in Gimp (I think Gimp actually opened the image up in UFRaw)
looks very similar
On Tue 05-Nov-2013 at 09:11 +1100, Terry Duell wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 02:35:05 +1100, Michael Perry
michaelpe...@mac.com wrote:
Why does the flat-scanned stitching tutorial state that You need to stop
Hugin from assuming that all the pictures were taken with the same
camera?
What is the
On Sun 03-Nov-2013 at 14:16 -0800, netswipe wrote:
I downloaded the precompiled version of Hugin. Unfortunally the automatic
setting of control pints does not work. When I click on Pictures and dtect
controlpoint automatically it says:
Can not find patfree-panomatic in path.
I had an old
.
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 5:54:23 PM UTC-5, Bruno Postle wrote:
Alternatively you could save a 'good' set of photometric parameters
and apply them to all photos.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message
Hi Macr, there are some strange things in your .pto project: there is a
very large lens distortion and the photos are in the project twice which is
triggering an unnecessary exposure fusion step.
But otherwise it is ok, you should get an image resembling a panorama from
this project. My best
On 7 October 2013 12:07, dkloi dkl...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is the problem due to the forward and reverse mappings of the input colour
space to CIECAM02 not being inverse? I would have expected that a
non-overlapping region should be mapped in the output to exactly the same
values as the
On Mon 09-Sep-2013 at 21:15 +0200, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
Again a pretty long time between RC1 and RC2. sorry.
As usual there are fedora packages here:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/bpostle/panorama/
--
Bruno
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
On 24 September 2013 10:06, Wesley wesleyelfr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in the process of stitching a 5 image 180x360 panorama, however I'm
getting some color clipping on the remapped images, while the source images
are ok. I posted an example of this behaviour here:
http://imgur.com/pSvQLuA.
It's saying that it wants you to add -lm to the linker flags.
Are you building from a tarball or from the mercurial repository? This
might already be fixed.
--
Bruno
On Sep 16, 2013 8:19 AM, Duc Nguyen Ngoc wrote:
I got this error when I was compiling the plugin AutoPano-Sift-C in
Ubuntu:
There is a command-line tool that ships with Hugin called pano_trafo, if
you give it a .pto file you can query coordinates (both forwards and
backwards).
Panotools::Script has a function to use this as a service, but the way this
is done in perl isn't likely to work on Windows.
--
Bruno
On 16
The ball and spring arrangement is usually called a 'detent ball'. When set
inside a grub screw like this they are called a 'ball plunger' or 'spring
ball plunger'.
--
Bruno
On 13 September 2013 15:37, Carl von Einem c...@einem.net wrote:
I once used click-stop selector screw since at that
be a problem.
Alternatively you could save a 'good' set of photometric parameters
and apply them to all photos.
--
Bruno
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 2:26:34 PM UTC-5, Bruno Postle
wrote:
The Hugin photometric (exposure/vignetting) optimisation uses a
random sample of from each photo, so you
On 12 Sep 2013 20:15, Yemi Harris y...@newspin360.com wrote:
Please could you shed some light on this particular issue I keep running
into. I've ran match-n-shift multiple times on the same set of 4 images and
every time I get slightly different .pto files. I've done tests to check if
the exif
On Thu 29-Aug-2013 at 14:07 -0700, Leonard Whistler wrote:
I would like Hugin to align the images using my manually set
control points and then export the images into GIMP, each image
onto its own layer. I'm on Ubuntu. Can this be done?
Stitch using the Stitcher tab but select the appropriate
On Sat 17-Aug-2013 at 14:38 -0700, Guillaume Lesniak wrote:
After checking cpfind parameters and docs on PanoTools Wiki, it
looks like there is a --prealigned mode, which matches images
after a predefined order (and thus, much faster and in a more
exact way). Since I'm using the gyroscope to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Panotools::Script is a perl module for reading/writing and
manipulating Hugin .pto project files, this 0.28 release has some
updates and fixes some bugs:
- - A fix for a bug that failed the test suite with perl 5.17.* and
later.
- - A new
On Jul 23, 2013 7:24 AM, lee reinhardt leebui...@gmail.com wrote:
enfuse: failed to open HDR_AIS_1670*: No such file or directory
You are using the * 'glob' to match multiple files, but enfuse is getting
the * instead of the list of files.
Either you are not in the same folder as the files,
On Tue 16-Jul-2013 at 09:15 -0700, mike b wrote:
Thank for the sugestions BugBear, It got me thinking...I was going to try
and time it and hit print screen, but for whatever reason it only made it
25% this time and didn't close putty.
Here is what I got.. hope this means something to
On Jul 15, 2013 9:52 AM, michael...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to install just the tools for hugin without the GUI for
command line stitching only?
I would like to install nona, cpfind, etc. on a Linux EL6 system.
Yes if you compile without wxwidgets headers present then only the command
On Jul 15, 2013 12:57 PM, michael...@gmail.com wrote:
I get:
CMake Error at CMakeModules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:51
(MESSAGE):
Could not find REQUIRED package wxWidgets
Ok looks like this option doesn't work anymore.
I have seen hugin-base rpms, but can't seem to find one for
On Mon 15-Jul-2013 at 12:10 -0700, mike b wrote:
I went a little crazy. yum install xorg-x11*
did not work - what a surprise...
Probably this has been replaced (as with fedora) by
mesa-libGLU-devel and libXmu-devel. Try rebuilding this src.rpm,
I've changed the dependencies (but untested
On Thu 11-Jul-2013 at 09:09 -0700, Charlie Reiman wrote:
As we use google groups for our group email, we may want to keep in mind
that google may kill google groups someday.
http://arstechnica.com/business/2013/07/as-latitude-falls-3-more-services-google-may-kill-for-the-sake-of-google/
Ars
On 8 Jul 2013 16:40, kfj wrote:
bitbucket offers unlimited users to open source projects, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/views/open-source-license-request
It took me a while to find this information, even though I knew it was
so, I couldn't find it. So I sent an email to the sales
On 4 Jul 2013 13:48, Florian H wrote:
So yesterday I asked myself: Is it possible to figure out the
camera-intern control parameters for lens correction with
out-of-the-box-JPGs?
The Idea is to shot for each focal length ONE photo and let it save by
the camera as RAW and (lens-corrected) JPG.
On 5 Jul 2013 10:43, Gnome Nomad wrote:
Maybe new cameras are fancier now, but I'm highly doubtful that any of
them can do any correction for lens distortion. Of course, probably someone
knows different. Or some camera makers marketing departments are run by
lunatics ...
My (getting elderly
On Sun 30-Jun-2013 at 22:10 +0200, Stefan Peter wrote:
On 26.06.2013 18:45, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
It took some time after the last beta1 release but there were some
serious issues on Mac OS X. This delay gave some translators the
possibility to update their languages.
Please find
On Jun 27, 2013 8:46 AM, Cristian Marchi wrote:
You need to create the complete panorama the first time and save the pto
file. Next create a new project, load all the images of the new panorama,
select File-Apply Template and load the previously saved pto file. It
should apply all previous
On Wed 26-Jun-2013 at 06:28 -0700, memecs wrote:
Just a quick question I couldn't find any answer online (and
didn't want to look into hugin src code...:) ). Is the pairwise
image matching optimized (e.g. with some sort of neighboring image
prediction) or, for each image added to the
On Jun 25, 2013 5:33 AM, Caleb Anderson wrote:
Thanks Bruno. How much am I able to do without image files present? I do
have generated keys for every image, but would like to throw them on a box
with significantly more horse power. Can I run cpfind and autooptimiser
with just key files?
Sorry
On Sun 23-Jun-2013 at 19:48 -0600, Caleb Anderson wrote:
Say I have n images. I want control points setup between only image 0 to
every n.
Is there a way to ask for this, or do I need to create n-1 pto files, each
of which only contains image 0 and the next n?
As suggested you can do it slowly
On Sun 23-Jun-2013 at 09:16 -0700, dex Otaku wrote:
On Saturday, 22 June 2013 11:25:00 UTC-5, Hans Bull wrote:
Another more or less related question: I'm getting the message on some
images Nona-GPU does not support the translation parameters. Switch to CPU
calculation.. Is there any active
On 21 June 2013 16:00, Caleb Anderson robotris...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems it might be useful for --linearmatch to not do complete
front-loading of all images, or at least support another option (that
would
likely only apply with --linearmatch) that allows cpfind to only load the
images used
On Jun 19, 2013 1:11 PM, bull...@gmail.com wrote:
In Hugin presets it is possible to enter different applications to use
instead of enfuse and enblend, e.g. multiblend. Unfortunately this is not
possible for nona. As a Linux user using bumblebee (
http://bumblebee-project.org/), i would like to
On Wed 12-Jun-2013 at 09:23 -1000, Gnome Nomad wrote:
Does anyone know why we receive what look like TWO slightly different
list sigs like this at the bottom? Maybe someone could combine the
two and reduce the extraneous line count a bit?
Google seem to have grown it over the years. I've
On Wed 12-Jun-2013 at 23:03 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Wed 12-Jun-2013 at 09:23 -1000, Gnome Nomad wrote:
Does anyone know why we receive what look like TWO slightly
different list sigs like this at the bottom? Maybe someone could
combine the two and reduce the extraneous line count a bit
On Jun 11, 2013 12:27 PM, Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola) wrote:
Funny, I am having problems sometimes with the jpg generated by enblend
at the end of the stitching process. It opens ok in GIMP and can be
converted ok with imagemagick, but some viewers, like xzgv and the xfce
default viewer
On Jun 11, 2013 7:43 AM, Isaac Gouy wrote:
On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 12:16:20 PM UTC-7, Bruno Postle wrote:
I've encountered a similar problem with DxO Optics Pro 8, which will
produce 48bit TIFF as output that is accepted by Enfuse or Hugin, but will
not accept the TIFF produced by Enfuse
On Jun 9, 2013 8:35 AM, Milan Knížek knizek.co...@gmail.com wrote:
did anyone succeed in running hugin through VNC/NX/RDP? Server should be
linux, client either Windows or Linux.
I have tested VirtualGLTurboVNC [1] and xf4vnc [2] with Arch Linux as a
server, the former enabled OpenGL (e.g.
On Jun 5, 2013 10:02 AM, Yili Zhao pan...@gmail.com wrote:
I am reading the Creating 360° enfused panoramas tutorial by Bruno
Postle: http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/enfuse-360/en.shtml, and I
want to try the exposure blended funtion with enfuse in Hugin as the
tutorial describes. I
On May 23, 2013 10:47 PM, byex...@gmail.com wrote:
I am a programmer and I am fully aware of what the crash error means,
when I have the time I will have a look at the source and try to figure out
why is crashing but I just wanted to check if this is even being looked at,
as it makes Hugin
On 20 May 2013 09:56, Stefan Peter s_pe...@swissonline.ch wrote:
No, and it probably will take some time to do so because the nightly
build depends on the yet unreleased libpano13-2.9.19 which fails to
build due to failing tests.
I'm not sure these tests are relevant, they have never worked
On Mon 20-May-2013 at 12:00 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
We are successfully running the testsuite on Debian (2.9.18), the
only relevant patch we are using is
On Wed 15-May-2013 at 20:17 -0700, Yaoxin Song wrote:
I have some images to be stitched with hugin command line.
However, there are still some unconnected images using CP
detector. I want discard automatically the unconnected images, but
I don't known how to do it.so I need help to complete my
On Thu 16-May-2013 at 09:17 +1000, Terry Duell wrote:
I regularly check for changes to the hugin repository, and do this by
pointing my browser at http://sourceforge.net/projects/hugin/.
On this web page I select code and in the menu I choose
mercurial, and from there I can look at the recent
On Fri 17-May-2013 at 08:28 +1000, Terry Duell wrote:
On Fri, 17 May 2013 05:57:36 +1000, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
They 'upgraded' us, but only migrated the unused SVN repository.
The old Mercurial repository is still there, read-only I think:
http://hugin.hg.sourceforge.net
On Mon 13-May-2013 at 16:45 -0700, ___matthieu___ wrote:
In the process of having a build of Hugin on MacOSX 10.8 that is compatible
with MacOSX 10.6, I found that libpano13 was using a symbol (___progname)
that was not present on OSX 10.6.
I only found it in sys_compat_unix.c; I replaced the
On Tue 14-May-2013 at 13:07 -0700, White Rabbit wrote:
On Monday, December 3, 2012 5:11:17 AM UTC-8, mph070770 wrote:
I'm picking up an old thread here but Wla's problem is similar to my
problem and I wonder if you can help.
I want to create a video panorama and I'm using 2 cameras to try out
Hi all, Sourceforge have 'upgraded' the panotools project on
sourceforge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/panotools/
Mercurial repositories have moved, you can now find the libpano13
code here:
hg clone http://hg.code.sf.net/p/panotools/libpano13
So if you have an existing checkout you
On 24 April 2013 04:23, Terry Duell wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:02:28 +1000, Donald Johnston wrote:
Under Interface I've selected Expert. On the stitching tab I selected
Panini General for the Projection. I used the help menu to link to the new
pages and drilled down to the Panini General
On 24 April 2013 16:23, Giancarlo Todone giancarlo.tod...@gmail.com wrote:
Wait... I could just be missing something obvious, or we're not speaking
about the same program.
As stated here there's no zoom in fast preview: only zoom I could find is
on overview. Both of them (preview/overview) are
On Wed 24-Apr-2013 at 09:35 -0700, Giancarlo Todone wrote:
Well, I hoped to calibrate my lens once and for all, and then use
the obtained values in subsequent panoramas. Since the robot scans
the panorama in rows, I can be pretty sure that regardless of
angle errors, all picture are the
On 23 April 2013 06:38, Terry Duell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:47:55 +1000, Michael Fuerst mjerryfue...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Does anyone have any insights or suggestions how might one develop or
approach developing an intuitive ability to use/create a Panini
like
401 - 500 of 1892 matches
Mail list logo
