At 13:36 -0500 on 10/11/2005, Glenn Miller wrote about Re: MVCIN instruction:
However, I saw a creative way to use 2 instructions that would reverse the
data in the read buffer. Remember
this code was originally written for a S/360 Model 30 machine. Anyone have
a guess what these instructions
We use intentionally STATIC.
In case we need, wich happens rarely due to our weekly IPL's, we
change to DYNAMIC previosly of changes.
We have not reconsidered to change to dynamic.
angel luis dominguez
bbva spain
-Mensaje original-
De: Peter
Only as a suggestion.. why not moving to logger/operlog and get
rid off syslog?
It was introduced ten years ago and in any moment IBM could force us
to change.
If you want, take a look at 513 CBT file.
angel luis dominguez
bbva - spain
PD:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC the model 30 1419 were exceeding time dependent you had x many
micro seconds to make the decision to tell the 1419 to direct the
document to the correct hopper. IIRC TR was one of the slower
instructions on the mod
On 10/12/2005 8:37 PM, Jay Maynard wrote:
The MVS Using the Subsystem Interface book says that you can change the job
name associated with a job by using the IAZXJSAB CREATE macro.
Unfortunately, I'm not having any success at all trying it. The only form of
the macro that's documented at all is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of DOMINGUEZ MARTIN, ANGEL
LUIS
We use intentionally STATIC.
In case we need, wich happens rarely due to our weekly
IPL's, we change to DYNAMIC previosly of changes.
We have not reconsidered to
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 07:24:04AM -0400, Walt Farrell wrote:
On 10/12/2005 8:37 PM, Jay Maynard wrote:
The MVS Using the Subsystem Interface book says that you can change the
job name associated with a job by using the IAZXJSAB CREATE macro.
Unfortunately, I'm not having any success at all
Someone just asked about last order date for z/OS 1.7, which just went GA.
For those of you who did not attend SHARE, it was announced that IBM
is now on a version a year schedule. IBM is planning 1.8 for fall
of 2006, and so on.
Duane
Franz, In a real disaster you cannot rely on getting ANY tapes, whether
logical or stacked from a VTS. Only data which you have exported or
copied to physical tapes at another site is available; I do hope you dont
plan on being able to step back inside the 3494 and pick up the important
stacked
In a recent note, Randy Hudson said:
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 05:00:50 -0400
The mod 30 used core memory. Because a memory read was destructive, the
memory hardware would automatically rewrite data after reading it, raising a
busy flag for the bank of ferrite cores including that bit
DOMINGUEZ MARTIN, ANGEL LUIS wrote:
Only as a suggestion.. why not moving to logger/operlog and get
rid off syslog?
It was introduced ten years ago and in any moment IBM could force us
to change.
That won't happen. There are a few Operlog show stoppers IBM would
need
It's not new news around IBM-MAIN but I stumbled on this note in the WSC
library which says the same thing Ed has said for many years about
letting go of the real 3270 screen geometries. It might be useful to
help convince others in your organization that this is really a good
idea.
Thanks, Sam
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 10:01:17AM -0400, Walt Farrell wrote:
Another by the way in response to your original question about how you
can change the jobname for your dynamically-allocated SYSOUT file.
If you can use z/OS UNIX functions, you could consider setting the
_bpx_jobname
Hi
I just looked at installing Z/OS 1.7.
The PTF's I would nee to put on my Z/OS 1.4 system are extensive but I would
need to go through a full system test to put on the maintenance.
I get one IPL per year so I'd like to find a way around it.
Has any one used or familiar
Hi George,
I have to ask. Is that one planned IPL per year? Do you have only one
system? Have you actually been able to hold to that over time?
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL
George Bly wrote:
snip
Has any one used or familiar with the Customized Offerings Driver product
5655-M12.
Questions are:
Is it free??
It's a no-additional-charge offering. (Entitled by z/OS license.)
Is it easy to install??
DFSMSdss RESTORE.
Is it easy to use??
It requires a
I wonder if the CCW chain could be processed fast enough that much of the
reversing could be done with the Chain Data flag and appropriate destination
addresses.
Were you thinking of a series of data-chained 1-byte reads to put the
data in the right order?
Doubtful. On unbuffered tape,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Bly
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 11:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Customized Offerings Driver
Hi
I just looked at installing Z/OS 1.7.
The PTF's
In a recent note, Charles Mills said:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 10:47:30 2005
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:42:00 -0700
Interesting information. Thanks.
How does the '+' continuation character mentioned earlier in
this thread interact with line numbers? (I avoid line
numbers,
We get 1 planned IPL per year.
Last IPL Jan 30 2005.
The maintenance is listed in the server pac requirements for the driving
system.
I may just try it without the maint.
I have a simple configuration. No sysplex, no sharing, no coexistence so I
may just give it a try.
George
McKown, John wrote:
I'm a bit confused. Are you saying that you need z/OS 1.4 maintenance
just to install z/OS 1.7? That sounds very strange to me. Most of the
time, any maintenance required is to tolerate or co-exist so that you
can share things like catalogs. I simply cannot imagine needing
I think FTP is pretty unhappy with line numbers in general. Tends to want to
make them into operands of the command. I think I recall (is this correct?)
that the plus has to be the last thing on the line, and I'm 99% certain that
if so, a sequence number would be the last thing, not the plus sign.
Greetings.
We're a single iron shop running Base Sysplex with three LPARs under Z/OS 1.4
I would like to have the ability to log onto each LPAR using the same User id.
If anyone has this configuration, could you give me a brief run down
of how to do it?
Thanks.
Rob R. Goings
Archer
Hi Rob,
You need to follow the following steps in allowing this to happen. First you
need to allow for ISPF temp files to be allocated under different names in each
lpar which would logically be the sysname. You can accomplish this by
changing the ISPF global table and creating a local table
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Goings, Rob
Greetings.
We're a single iron shop running Base Sysplex with three
LPARs under Z/OS 1.4
I would like to have the ability to log onto each LPAR using
the same User id.
If anyone has this
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:42:47 -0500, Wayne luo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...These are two NNs exist in in same one sysplex,I tried to logon to
another NN's tso or any other vtam application from one NN but
failed,sensecode is 08060023,These two NNs communitcate each other with
XCF,We can find these
How can we determine DCB attributes for a USS file? We're trying to do
an IEBGENER (SYNCSORT's flavor) from a particular path and getting
IEB317I JOB TERMINATED, NO INPUT BLKSIZE/LRECL because we don't know
what values to use for RECFM, LRECL, BLKSIZE. I assume it's not the
same as the HFS which
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johnson, William
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 2:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: DCB attributes for USS file
How can we determine DCB attributes for a USS file? We're
Won't RECFM=U,LRECL=arbitrary_fairly_large_guess work for most purposes,
including IEBGENER?
Of course, if you're copying it to a traditional MVS file then for the
output file you are going to have to deal with the traditional issues of
dataset allocation, the associated DCB attributes, and
How can we determine DCB attributes for a USS file? We're
trying to do
an IEBGENER (SYNCSORT's flavor) from a particular path and getting
IEB317I JOB TERMINATED, NO INPUT BLKSIZE/LRECL because we don't know
what values to use for RECFM, LRECL, BLKSIZE. I assume it's not the
same as the
I don't do anything special. I use the same logon proc and userid. The
RACF database is shared among LPAR and so is the logon proc. The only
problem I run into is the LOG gets allocated by one LPAR the other LPAR
receives an error message that the session will not have logging active.
I have heard
In a recent note, McKown, John said:
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:25:36 -0500
-Original Message-
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Johnson, William
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 2:17 PM
How can we determine DCB attributes for a USS file? We're
trying to do
Search the archives.
Mark Zelden as a 3 page description of what you need to do which is
excellent.
I just used his guidlines to get it set up here.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
You could change the ISPF temporary dataset qualifiers also in similar
fashion to prevent those error messages about log. Use the exec
ISPCCONF, this exec is present in ISPCLIB, to create ISPF Configuration
module. The ISPF Configuration module should be placed in ISPLLIB of TSO
LOGON.
Thanks
Nat
Hello,
We recently converted to virtual tape and 3592. Now mgt is itching to
get the 3480s off the floor. My question is, do vendors (IBM and CA
mostly) offer products on 3592 format or are we going to have problems
if we get rid of the 3480 drives and try to order new software? I know
there are
I went to IBM link, SRD and found these delivery options:
ELEC - Electronic delivery
INET - Delivery to an internet server
1600 - Tape 1600
6250 - Tape 6250
3480 - Cartridge 3480
3590 - IBM Magstar Tape Subsystem
C4MM - 4 millimeter cartridge
Considering the cost of a 3592 cartridge I would be surprised if many vendors
offer it as an option.
What I do see a lot more of is CD's and electronic transfer.
Depending on local Tax laws an electronic transfer (i.e. NO physical media) may
exempt you from sales tax.
Ken Porowski
AVP Systems
Bob,
Thanks - you're right that we had to rely on our personal contacts - IBM's
customer references, and Gartner - those were pretty much the sources we
had.
What suprised me was that IBM could not provide us with any contacts for
fully duplexed GDPS users, but that may be peculiar to what it is
My major customer recently went through similar - but with STK. Exacerbates
the issue.
All the old stand-alone kit came off support, and was returned to the
vendor. But 2 new (as in refurb'd) drives were purchased to handle 3480/90
carts - these are located at the main site (only), where real live
What suprised me was that IBM could not provide us with any contacts for
fully duplexed GDPS users, but that may be peculiar to what it is we want
to do
...
What do you want to do?
Before I got downsized, I worked for IGS, Canada; we were fully duplexed.
If I can answer your questions without
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:29:58 -0500, Goings, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings.
We're a single iron shop running Base Sysplex with three LPARs under Z/OS 1.4
I would like to have the ability to log onto each LPAR using the same User id.
If anyone has this configuration, could you give me a
I pretty much followed Mark Zeldon's excellent advice at
http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
(Under heading Quick Index, click on JOBs/Doc, and then look for
$SNGLTSO.TXT).
In particular, his document
http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsfiles/$sngltso.txt
does a great job hilighting the
Where was this 20 years ago when I -wanted- to move to Alaska...
- Original Message -
From: Gary Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 5:55 PM
Subject: Systems Programmer Position
The following is posted
On Oct 13, 2005, at 4:00 AM, Randy Hudson wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
SNIP--
I wonder if the CCW chain could be processed fast enough that much of
the
reversing could be done with
Ed Gould wrote:
Randy,
I still remember in those days the POPS for each model had the micro
seconds each instruction took. My memory is sketchy and after the
document was read you had X (I don't remember) many microseconds to
make a decision as to which bin you could send the document
Here are feedback notes about the SHARE videos, recorded live at SHARE in
Boston, that are posted on www.ispw.ca/share . Some notes include comments
about how much people say they would be willing to pay if this became a
serious offering.
Please note - cost has not been decided. This is a
46 matches
Mail list logo
