"Mendelson, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>...
> Any one with 3390 mod54 . Any problems experiences good or bad
>
>
No experience yet, but there is the warning that your software should be
checked to support them. They have fullword number of cylinders and t
Hi,
I faced strange OMVS issue, our HFS root was about
3300 cyls, We faced shortage problem, so I defined it
as multivolume HFS.
Few months later I found it about 14 thousands Cyls
which is almost five time than before.
I do not know why it came so big like this, I checked
the content of the roo
-- snip --
Any one with 3390 mod54 . Any problems experiences good or bad
-- snip --
No software or response time problems to date. Ensure that you check with
your Software suppliers for support info.
Dumping them takes a very long time. We're reviewing whether it is needed
at all in our particul
Hello Craig,
I have used TSSO on the z/OS 1.4 system and it works fine. We used it
to stage the startup/shutdown process and trap console messages that
need an operator response. Of course, YMMV. It is a good automation
product and easy to use.
Have any questions, let me know.
Claude
>>> [EMAIL
Say that a supervisor state program (obviously) changes a CR directly, without
using the various MVS services - what will happen when an interrupt occurs?
Will the CR's remain the same or will they be reset to the last known
MVS-approved state?
Is that any different if RTM gets control due to an
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
>
> >IBM has been getting rid of office space for a long time now
>
> It has been cost effective in Canada for at least the last 4-5 years.
>
> It's cheaper to give them a pager, cell, laptop, printer, &
FYI. It turns out that our region limit is being altered by an ISV
product for buffering.
Thanks to all that replied.
Mike Martin
^
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please
John Fly wrote:
Is there any package(IBM, or otherwise) to analyse SMF datasets
directly on a PC? (Windows, Unix, etc..)??
SAS is avalaible for Windows and I think Unix.
We are looking at getting rid of SAS on z/OS and replacing it with SAS
on PC's.
-
On 21 Jan 2006 07:40:16 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clark Morris)
wrote:
>I am reading ibm-main as a newsgroup and would like an easier method
>in Agent 3.1 to reply to the listserv than clicking forward and typing
>in the address. It worked easier in 2.x.
One of the best things about Agent is i
Mohamed Juma wrote:
Hi,
I faced strange OMVS issue, our HFS root was about
3300 cyls, We faced shortage problem, so I defined it
as multivolume HFS.
Few months later I found it about 14 thousands Cyls
which is almost five time than before.
I do not know why it came so big like this, I checked
www.mxg.com
__
Dave Thorn * Senior Technology Analyst * SunGard Computer Services * 600
Laurel Oak Road, Voorhees, NJ, 08043
Tel 856 566-5412 * Mobile 609 781-0353 * Fax 856 566-3656
CONFIDENTIALITY:
>Last week I saw that IBM is selling off *some* of their building
>downtown for condo's
You didn't say where. IBM sold its Cottle Road facility in San Jose. I
can't imagine how much it sold for, but given the value of property in
Silicon Valley, and given the potential cost of cleanup after 50 y
There's also EPV for z/OS from EPV Technologies. They process SMF records on
PC.
Gil.
John Fly wrote:
> Is there any package(IBM, or otherwise) to analyse SMF datasets
> directly on a PC? (Windows, Unix, etc..)??
>
--
For IBM-MA
>Those, and the "tradition" of "seeing warm bodies with noses to the
grindstones"
That fear went away, in the greater Toronto area, years ago.
The current fear is the cost of real estate.
A typical cube cost over $6,000 CDN per year.
I can supply somebody with all the needs for home for around $2
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 16:45:01 -0500, Kittendorf, Craig
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>For z/OS 1.4 on z890, is TSSO on CBT file 404 the one I need? I assume
>others have 'been there, done that, got the t-shirt."
Yup, no problem on 1.4
>
>Problems ? Gotchas?
>
Always pull the latest versio
One of the steps of z/OS Unix sysplex customization is job BPXISYSR.
Among other thing, the job creates directory ... (three dots) in root
directory. What is purpose of the directory ?
I can't find any reason.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
---
I will be running z/OS 1.4 in 31 bit on z900 machines with ICFs. Can I
have more than 2GB defined as central storage on my ICF, even if the
z/OS lpars are still running 31 bit mode.
Larry Kraus
RiteAid Corp
717-214-8511
Disclaimer: This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use of
t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Shannon) writes:
> You didn't say where. IBM sold its Cottle Road facility in San Jose. I
> can't imagine how much it sold for, but given the value of property in
> Silicon Valley, and given the potential cost of cleanup after 50 years
> of disk manufacturing, they probably m
Yes, but it depends on the CFCC level in the CF lpar. I think CFCC level
12 or higher supports greater than 2GB real.
Mark Jacobs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Larry Kraus
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 10:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mohamed Juma
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 3:52 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Unix Root grouth
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I faced strange OMVS issue, our HFS root was about
> 3300 cyls,
I've been working on a master's in accounting. Still early in my efforts.
Have you seen anything about IBM being concerned about return on assets
rather than return on investment ? - Paul Hanrahan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
O
"Charles Mills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Thanks.
>
> I always do an Ignore (MVI 3(R1),4) and branch to the address passed in
R14.
>
> I do the Ignore without checking whether it is an allowed option (it is
in
> this case) on the theory that if it's not, wha
Hi,
If you have HDS dasd, take a loop at OA14708.
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
Banco Bradesco S/A
4254/DPCD Alphaville
Suporte Tecnico - Software Basico Mainframes
Tel: 55 11 4197-2021 Fax: 55 11 4197-2814
AVISO LEGAL Esta mensagem é destinada exclusivam
In a message dated 1/23/2006 8:14:04 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SAS is avalaible for Windows and I think Unix.
We are looking at getting rid of SAS on z/OS and replacing it with SAS
on PC's.
>>
Think Barry Merrill has the why's and wherefores documented at _w
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/20/2006
at 08:36 PM, Steve Samson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I have been receiving a couple of junk mails (with attachments and
>viruses) a day from "IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU". I know that Shane uses
>that as a return address. Are there any others? Could a system hav
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/20/2006
at 05:36 PM, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Unfortunately the powers that be are unimpressed by the "I just did
>it to see what it is/would happen" defence since that is equally
>available to the real baddies. The news has had some cases of even
>pr
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/21/2006
at 09:00 AM, Charles Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I suspect this is one of those classic MVS stories. When the gurus of
>the sixties designed QSAM, the theory was that after a DCB ABEND the
>program went away, so it didn't matter what state anything was
>Can I
have more than 2GB defined as central storage on my ICF, even if the
z/OS lpars are still running 31 bit mode.
No, not yet.
There is the concept of control/non-control storage.
CF-Speak for Central/Expanded.
I don't believe IBM has come out with 64-bit CF's, yet.
If they have, I missed the
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/20/2006
at 08:27 PM, "John S. Giltner, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Am I the only one receive e-mail that states it is from
>IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU that has virus attached?
Bpgus return paths are common in spam. Ask your provider to block
61.95.194.0/24 until bh
Look at http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/pso/cftable.html
A level 12 coupling facility (CFLEVEL=12) provides the following
enhancements:
* 64 bit Support, removal of the 2G line
* 48 Concurrent Tasks
* Support for Message Time Ordering providing enhaced Sysplex Timer
Conn
Isn't that what I said?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 8:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: QSAM DCB not restored by CLOSE following S013-18 on OPEN
I
Mark T is apparently right. The "Using Data Sets" manual says:
"If bit 5 of the option mask is set to 1, you can ignore the abend by
placing a value of 4 in byte 3 of the parameter list. Processing on the
current DCB stops and bit DCBOFOPN is off. There is no need to issue
CLOSE. If you su
Thanks. I expect coding a workaround is a more productive use of my time
than wrestling with IBM.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mark Thomen
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 8:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
Yes you can have more than 2G of central storage defined for an ICF
provided it is on a zSeries CPU with the right driver and CFCC level.
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/pso/cftable.html
I have an ICF on 2094 and a 2086 operating as CF each with 16G as only
central storage defined
There are multiple existances of TSSO on the CBT, that why I was double
checking.
Thanks,
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Cartwright
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 10:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TSS
Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
> in the mid-80s there was a predication that ibm world-wide business
> was going to double ($60b/annuum to $120b/annum) and there was a
> massive manufacturing construction program. one of those was large
> bldg. 50 on the main plant site. in the later downsizing from th
We have a handful of customers who will still be attempting to use bisynch
connectivity through BTAM when we go to 1.7 . It works fine on 1.4.
-
The information contained in this communication (including any
attachments hereto) is confidential and is inte
Thanks. We are at 1.4 and running successfully so far. We expect to be
running 1.7 by September this year. I've heard rumors that it has been
running on 1.7 and that lots of people out there are still using the 3745.
Richard Lopez
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [
Thanks for the replies. I think all were private.
I think my z/OS system can support X client (the installer) and I have a
X server on a Linux desktop.
But, I'm not even up to the need for X yet. I'm getting a message
indicating that Java can't allocate enough storage:
JVMDBG001:
Are you running 31 bit z/OS?
Larry
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Knutson, Sam
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 12:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Coupling Facility > 2GB of central
Yes you can have more than 2G of
As a follow-up to my "Tape Encryption Products List" posting from last
August, here's some more information.
1. Obviously the IBM software product ("IBM Encryption Facility for
z/OS") is available and now well known, so that's one of two statements of
direction fulfilled. Details here:
http:
Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM wrote:
"Mendelson, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>...
Any one with 3390 mod54 . Any problems experiences good or bad
No experience yet, but there is the warning that your software should be
checked to support them. They have
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob
Scott
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX Problem
A usage note on using "address (env)" on every call is that on return
the address environmen
On Jan 23, 2006, at 8:36 AM, Bob Shannon wrote:
Last week I saw that IBM is selling off *some* of their building
downtown for condo's
You didn't say where. IBM sold its Cottle Road facility in San Jose. I
can't imagine how much it sold for, but given the value of property in
Silicon Valley, an
In a message dated 1/23/2006 12:57:04 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If anyone knows of any relevant products that haven't been mentioned yet
in the "Tape Encryption Products List" thread, by all means please chime
in.
>>
The Jan 2006 Tech Support Mag from Naspa
>>> Last week I saw that IBM is selling off *some* of their building
>>> downtown for condo's
>
>> You didn't say where. IBM sold its Cottle Road facility in San Jose.
I
>> can't imagine how much it sold for, but given the value of property
in
>> Silicon Valley, and given the potential cost of c
HSEND BACKDS dataset TARGET(TAPE)
Dave Gibney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Programmer(509) 335-7359
Information Technology
Washington State University
Pullman, WA 99164-1222
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [m
Yes, we are using it:
MEMBER =3D SMFPRM1E
MULCFUNC -- DEFAULT
MEMLIMIT(0M) -- DEFAULT
DDCONS(YES) -- DEFAULT
LASTDS(MSG) -- DEFAULT
NOBUFFS(MSG) -- DEFAULT
SYNCVAL(00) -- DEFAULT
INTVAL(30) -- DEFAULT
DUMPABND(RETRY) -- DEFAULT
SUBSYS(TSO,NOTYPE(16,19,90,99)) -- SYS
SUBSYS(TSO,DETAIL) -- PARMLI
It's possible the problem is with your IEFU29 exit. There's an item on IBMLink
that mentioned this. Try starting SMF without the IEFU29 exit. When a switch
from one of your SMF dump data sets occurs either because the data set is full
or you manually switch it, see if the status of that data
>
> Say that a supervisor state program (obviously) changes a CR directly,
> without using the various MVS services - what will happen when an
> interrupt occurs?
>
> Will the CR's remain the same or will they be reset to the last known
> MVS-approved state?
>
> Is that any different if RTM gets
Larry Kraus wrote:
Are you running 31 bit z/OS?
IMHO it's irrelevant. You can run 31-bit OS in one LPAR, 64-bit OS in
another. CFCC is another OS in this scenario.
All you need is proper HW with proper microcode level (including CFCC
code).
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
---
IBM-Main-ers.
Thinking about registering and just haven't done it yet?
Check out the MVS/SCP newsletter and learn about some good reasons to
register for SHARE in Seattle.
The newsletter includes
- SURVIVAL KIT for SHARE in Seattle
- Sessions sponsored by the MVS SCP Project
- SHARE w
>> Are you running 31 bit z/OS?
The mode of the OS doesn't affect the mode of the CF & vice versa.
The OS accesses by structure name & the CF worries about location.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/20/2006
at 08:42 PM, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>You need to read section 10.5 The SYSREQ Function of RFC 2355 in
>order to know why this discussion is taking place.
I took a look at RFC 2355, and see several disturbing things. First,
thewre is a lot of
> Had you been a little more exegetic, you could have noticed that the
> statement was intended
to say that IBM should make a license agreement with Hercules and create a
"student version"
of z/OS, then bundle that with the new zScholar program to reach those
institutions unable to
afford an act
I think one could even do FLIP/FLOP.
IIRC
In an ISREDIT macro, it comes in with the default of ISREDIT and ISPEXEC on
the "FLIP" side.
So
"MACRO"
"."
"."
ADDRESS /* No(env) FLIPs you back to ISPEXEC */
"."
"."
"."
ADDRESS /* And FLOP into ISREDIT */
"."
Woe to those who hit PF8 and advance into unused DATASPACE storage.
Is there an option in IPCS Browse to overcome the HANG (X CLOCK) situation
when paging into the unused portion of a 2G dataspace dump?
Perhaps an option to turn off similar line compression?
(Things I do in my spare time: browse
> Woe to those who hit PF8 and advance into unused DATASPACE storage.
>
> Is there an option in IPCS Browse to overcome the HANG (X CLOCK)
situation
> when paging into the unused portion of a 2G dataspace dump?
>
> Perhaps an option to turn off similar line compression?
>
> (Things I do in my sp
z/OS 1.7.00
Todd
>
> I thought they had fixed that? What release are you on?
>
> CC
>
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
That belongs to DFS. From the DFS Administration book:
"The DFS global namespace must be mounted on a local disk directory.
In z/OS, the local directory where the global namespace is mounted
must be / (The /... is usually created during the DFS
installation.)
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
Hi all,
I have a CD with the title "IBM CICS Transaction Server for z/OS Version
3.1" . Please let me know whether I can use this CD to install CICS 3.1 in
my z/OS system.
I have a document with publication no. and name - GI10-2586-00 - Program
Directory for CICS Transaction Server for z/OS, t
Todd,
if you do a max PF8 while browsing, AFAIK you're out of luck. IPCS is going
to read the whole dataspace, all 2GB of it, if you're unlucky. (Or all of
the 64bit address space, for that matter.)
Better to look for something via FIND. FIND is going to stop whenever there
is 'storage not availa
62 matches
Mail list logo
