Re: setting LE runtime options programatically.

2007-01-29 Thread John R. Grout
Jim McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >We have just started down the road of trying >to invoke java classes from batch COBOL but >have hit a problem with the 100 character PARM >field length because we need to specify several >runtime options such as ENVAR=, POSIX(ON) >AND XPLINK(ON) on top

Cascading FICON director with DASD and TAPE devices

2007-01-29 Thread Bruce Hewson
Hello Folks, we start to use FICON native devices. we have one FICON DASD box now direct connected to 2 CECs. we have plan to buy some FICON directors, FICON DASD and FICON virtual/real tape systems in two separate sites. At this smallish number of devices I wanted to initially connect DASD an

Re: IBM to Acquire Softek

2007-01-29 Thread John Ticic
-- snip -- I like the way you think, but this one actually makes a lot of sense. I can see Global Services licking their chops at the prospect of doing storage vendor migrations, whether it is to or from IBM DASD. -- snip -- Here in Germany, FDRPAS is offered by IBM to aid in data migration when y

Re: M$ Vista Experiences?

2007-01-29 Thread Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3)
The update is way too expensive. Too many versions (Home Basic, Home blabla, etc, etc). Can't tell about functionality. Peter Hunkeler CREDIT SUISSE -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email t

Re: FICON CTC MIH

2007-01-29 Thread John Ticic
-- snip -- We haven't got anything specified in IECIOSxx but are having some difficulty getting VARY commands to them to complete. -- snip -- We make pretty extensive use of FICON CTCs, including 'channel extension' over DWDM. Our IECIOS00 has no entries at all for CTCs, so we're taking defaults. N

Fw: setting LE runtime options programatically.

2007-01-29 Thread Bill Klein
There have been lots of answers, but as you have explicitly said that you are NOT on z/OS 1.8, let me give you a summary of my understanding: 1) PL/I has "plixopt" (as I recall and COBOL has a share requirement, but currently there is NO way to set LE run-time options at the time of a COBOL compil

M$ Vista Experiences?

2007-01-29 Thread Ed Finnell
Just checking. Good, bad, indifferent? Think I'll wait for the next CPU upgrade. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Bill Planer
If you are only interested in auditing the use of a program, have you considered implementing RACF PROGRAM protection (or the equivalent in your security system) for the program. Set the audit options of the PROGRAM profile to audit successful accesses. Then you can determine use by processing th

Re: JES2 WLM INIT's strange behavior

2007-01-29 Thread Brian Peterson
I had this seemingly exact same problem on my tech LPAR back in November 2006 - z/OS 1.7. The problem went away after an IPL. I suggest opening a PMR with IBM. I queued my PMR to component 5752SC1CX since my problem seemed similar to OA16905. In my case, the dumps taken during the problem di

Re: TN3270 server offload options

2007-01-29 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>If you have an OSA adapter, or some other TCP/IP network interface, you can run the TN3270 server that comes with TCP/IP The last stat I heard was a single OSA was good for 13,000 sessions. With VIPA, multiple images, the sky is the limit. (Can you say: "We will only ever need to use 640"?) All

Re: TN3270 server offload options

2007-01-29 Thread Richard Peurifoy
Robert Mattingly wrote: > We need to migrate offloaded TN3270 server sessions from ESCON connected > Cisco CPA (Channel Port Adapter) devices. I am not aware of an IBM option > for this since the 3172 went away. From the research I have done, it > looks like Visara has a good option with thei

Re: TN3270 server offload options

2007-01-29 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>Does anyone know of other options or have any recommendations? I guess I really don't under the question. We are converting from SNA (Microsoft SNA Server) to 'straight' TCP/IP through VIPA/OSA. Seriously, what more do you need? - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---

TN3270 server offload options

2007-01-29 Thread Robert Mattingly
We need to migrate offloaded TN3270 server sessions from ESCON connected Cisco CPA (Channel Port Adapter) devices. I am not aware of an IBM option for this since the 3172 went away. From the research I have done, it looks like Visara has a good option with their 1174 comm. server line. The o

Re: IBM to Acquire Softek

2007-01-29 Thread Richards.Bob
Shane, I like the way you think, but this one actually makes a lot of sense. I can see Global Services licking their chops at the prospect of doing storage vendor migrations, whether it is to or from IBM DASD. On the other hand, IBM could produce a PSI equivalent without needing to acquire IP fro

Re: debug tool comparison

2007-01-29 Thread Tom Savor
-- My experience here is limited; I've only installed the IBM Debug Tool. But the install was a cakewalk and maintenance is straightforward SMP/E processing. As a Intertest and Xpediter use

Re: IBM to Acquire Softek

2007-01-29 Thread Shane
So - take some IP from the old Amdahl days, get a start-up going, and wait for IBM to throw (presumably) large buckets of money at you to acquire the company. Maybe there's hope for the PSI folks yet ... :0) Shane ... (no Ed, them other ones) ---

IBM to Acquire Softek

2007-01-29 Thread Knutson, Sam
http://www.softek.com/ http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/20976.wss Best Regards, Sam Knutson, GEICO Performance and Availability Management mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (office) 301.986.3574 IBM: I've Been Mo

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Tom Schmidt
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:48:34 +0100, Jon Renton wrote: >- Why? We want to "trap" calls to certain 3rd party products and log these. >This is a standard auditing requirement and is not illegal. The use of this >information must of course be closely controlled to avoid any misuse. No >one worries ab

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Charles Mills
Does this work with PDS? Only PDSE? Only HFS? I did not mention it but one surprising result of my experimentation was finding that a STOW of a member name that began with a digit completed without error, but afterwards the member simply did not exist. Yes, probably reportable as a defect, but I w

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Arthur T.
On 29 Jan 2007 13:48:49 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main (Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon Renton) wrote: - Why? We want to "trap" calls to certain 3rd party products and log these. That probably would have been a better question to ask, then. Have you consi

JES2 WLM INIT's strange behavior

2007-01-29 Thread Greg Saccomanno
I brought up my sandbox LPAR in my basic sysplex for testing of z/OS 1.7. The other systems are z/OS 1.4. We use WLM managed JES2 initiators where the work is assigned to one of four services classes with varying velocity goals. When running batch jobs on my 1.7 system, jobs for two of my 4

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Skip Robinson
The home grown application I alluded to in my previous post was written simply to track what we were running. It was motivated originally by Y2K and the need to get a handle on what programs actually executed; not just what we had installed or written over the years. I can answer your question

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>Be very very afraid of running anything on MVS. Scary. Very scary! The last thing you should do is trust your SYSPROG. Lock everything down! Make the change process so onerous that only business critical gets fixed. And, only if the important jobs abend at least twice a day. That way everything

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Gibney, Dave
Another way would be to insist the 3rd party enhance the product to include a logging feature. > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Renton > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 1:49 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject:

Re: FICON CTC MIH

2007-01-29 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>Most disk vendors now are probably recommending at least 5 minutes or larger 15-30, the last time I checked with a vendor. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

AW: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Jon Renton
Gil, I agree - my aim is not to restrict access to data - just log the use! Regards Jon -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Paul Gilmartin Gesendet: Montag, 29. Januar 2007 22:55 An: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Betreff: Re: Getti

Re: debug tool comparison

2007-01-29 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>The hardest part of such an installation will be getting the programmers to >use the tool We did it in the most expedient (and draconian way). We disabled all the other comparable tools. (8-{>} - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -

Re: SORT - Logical EOF on SORTIN

2007-01-29 Thread Gilbert Saint-Flour
On Monday 29 January 2007 15:38, Robert Jones wrote: > Not answering your question directly, but it would be nice if one > could use DLM=X'xx' on the DD statement ... or something more generic, for example STOPWHEN=(1,2,BI,EQ,X'') on the OPTION statement. Thank you to John Reda and Frank Ya

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Charles Mills said: > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:04:17 -0800 > > Cool idea. Other characters may also be possible. I got into this when I had > my company with its PC-mainframe file transfer, and was dealing with how to > handle making members out of PC file names. As I r

Re: setting LE runtime options programatically.

2007-01-29 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>I'm presuming also that we should have these options switched off when running >non-Java programs. I'm not 100% sure; I thought they were the type of options you could just turn on, and forget it. Maybe a little more CPU (or memory); surely not enough to worry about? There are other options l

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Shane
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:54 -0500, Binyamin Dissen wrote: > Be very very afraid of running anything on MVS. > > Various interrupt handlers seize control away from the abused little program > and do what they wish. Not to mention damn near every ISV product you have silently front-ending catalog,

Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Jon Renton
Hello, Thank you for the interesting discussion. I would like to address some of the various points made. - Why? We want to "trap" calls to certain 3rd party products and log these. This is a standard auditing requirement and is not illegal. The use of this information must of course be closely c

Re: debug tool comparison

2007-01-29 Thread Rick Fochtman
-- I have been assigned the task to research debug tool for our shop. We are mostly an LE COBOL shop and do batch and CICS processing equaly. I reviewed IBM debug tool, xpediter, Ca-Intertest,ASG-SmartTest; they appear to all be somewhat e

Re: Scratch orphaned PS files

2007-01-29 Thread Shane
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:05 -0800, Carl Edwards wrote: > Amazing how easy it is once you know how Here's another easy solution - just recat them and delete them as normal. Can all be done from ISPF unless there are already catalog entries for the same. Shane ...

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Craddock, Chris
Pat said... > This doesn't sound like a well though out plan to me. Amen. But then they seldom are. CC -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM

Re: FICON CTC MIH

2007-01-29 Thread Skip Robinson
We make pretty extensive use of FICON CTCs, including 'channel extension' over DWDM. Our IECIOS00 has no entries at all for CTCs, so we're taking defaults. No one has reported any related problems. . . JO.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 626-302-7535

Re: Scratch orphaned PS files

2007-01-29 Thread Carl Edwards
John; Thanks Amazing how easy it is once you know how --- John Kington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IBM Mainframe Discussion List > wrote on 01/29/2007 > 03:52:41 PM: > > > Hi; > > I have a couple of orphaned PS files kicking > arround > > my Z/OS system. I have tried to get rid of them > with >

Re: Scratch orphaned PS files

2007-01-29 Thread Dean Montevago
If they are SMS manged try DELETE NVR. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carl Edwards Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 3:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Scratch orphaned PS files Hi; I have a couple of orphaned PS files ki

Re: Scratch orphaned PS files

2007-01-29 Thread Imbriale, Donald (Exchange)
Are these PS data sets on the volume or in the catalog? If it's PS, try DELETE NVR instead of VVR or DEL NSCR if it's in the catalog and not on the volume. Don Imbriale -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carl Edwards Sent: Monday

Re: Scratch orphaned PS files

2007-01-29 Thread John Kington
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 01/29/2007 03:52:41 PM: > Hi; > I have a couple of orphaned PS files kicking arround > my Z/OS system. I have tried to get rid of them with > > DELETE VVR No Luck > IEHPROGM SCRATCH No Luck > > All ideas appreciated > > Carl, You should be using NVR

Scratch orphaned PS files

2007-01-29 Thread Carl Edwards
Hi; I have a couple of orphaned PS files kicking arround my Z/OS system. I have tried to get rid of them with DELETE VVR No Luck IEHPROGM SCRATCH No Luck All ideas appreciated The fish are biting. G

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:44:33 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >To me, front ending a user's program without their knowledge sounds like >an auditor's nightmare. ... >Front ending a user's program could be used for similar illegal >activity. If you do this you had better have a go

Re: Overriding SDATA options for SLIP

2007-01-29 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:59:54 -0500, Jim Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >... > I think SLIP does not specify QUIESCE=YES on its SDUMPX macro. So a >SLIP dump will get the SDUMP/X default of QUIESCE=YES, unless >Q=NO was specified on CHNGDUMP. >... Jim, Thanks for digging into this. Apparently

Re: AW: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Charles Mills
Cool idea. Other characters may also be possible. I got into this when I had my company with its PC-mainframe file transfer, and was dealing with how to handle making members out of PC file names. As I recall, at least at that time, it was possible to STOW a member with lower case letters in the na

Re: SORT - Logical EOF on SORTIN

2007-01-29 Thread Frank Yaeger
Howard Brazee wrote on 01/29/2007 10:34:41 AM: > Could you explain what you're doing here? //S1 EXEC PGM=ICETOOL //TOOLMSG DD SYSOUT=* //DFSMSG DD SYSOUT=* //IN DD DSN=... input file (FB/80) //CTL2CNTL DD DSN=&&T1,UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(1,1)),DISP=(,PASS) //OUT DD DSN=... output file (FB/80) //T

Re: AW: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Ray Mullins
Crazy thought - what about borrowing the X'C0' "loophole" for the member name? For those who haven't delved into this stuff, for type 3/4 single module SVCs the convention is to have the last character X'C0' - X'C9', corresponding to the zoned decimal representation of the SVC number (e.g., IGC000

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Gerhard Postpischil
Charles Mills wrote: A solution that fully addresses the question above will require modifications to LOAD, etc., etc., with all of the baggage that that implies. A skilled user can bypass LOAD and other CSV services. I have a small subroutine that does a GETMAIN, then loads and relocates a

Re: setting LE runtime options programatically.

2007-01-29 Thread Denis Gäbler
Hi, I had the same problem. This could be easily solved, by using a CEEUOPT Module. But that means that the LE Runtime Options that should be used by the module, have to be defined as being overridable by an CEEUOPT module. An example is appended. In addition, this scenario is supported und

Re: setting LE runtime options programatically.

2007-01-29 Thread Clark Morris
On 29 Jan 2007 08:14:32 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >We have just started down the road of trying to invoke java classes from >batch COBOL but have hit a problem with the 100 character PARM field length >because we need to specify several runtime options such as ENVAR=, >POSIX(O

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:44:33 -0500 "Veilleux, Jon L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :>To me, front ending a user's program without their knowledge sounds like :>an auditor's nightmare. I remember someone writing a VM exec that :>mimicked a VM logon screen and then would link to a user's A drive. He :>

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
To me, front ending a user's program without their knowledge sounds like an auditor's nightmare. I remember someone writing a VM exec that mimicked a VM logon screen and then would link to a user's A drive. He used it to get prople's userid and password. Front ending a user's program could be used

Re: SORT - Logical EOF on SORTIN

2007-01-29 Thread Howard Brazee
On 29 Jan 2007 09:44:00 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Yaeger) wrote: Could you explain what you're doing here? >//S1 EXEC PGM=ICETOOL >//TOOLMSG DD SYSOUT=* >//DFSMSG DD SYSOUT=* >//IN DD DSN=... input file (FB/80) >//CTL2CNTL DD DSN=&&T1,UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(1,1)),DISP=(,PASS) >//OUT DD DSN

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:26:23 -0800, Skip Robinson wrote: >I didn't see anything in this thread about WHY you want to do this, but >you seem to have ruled out the simpler, safer techniques. I hate to say >it, but if you have to ask for a more sophisticated approach, you probably >should not even tr

Re: LU definition for TN3270 printer(3287)

2007-01-29 Thread Roberto Halais
Johnny: Sorry. I don't know of any other appl. I'running OS/290 2.10 My FSS: -- FSS(PRINTWAY) PROC=ANFWPROC, HASPFSSM=HASPFSSM, AUTOSTOP=YES My JES2 printers are defined as: PRT(97) CLASS=T, FSS=PRINTWAY, MODE=FSS, P

Re: FICON CTC MIH

2007-01-29 Thread Bill Wilkie
My experience with MIH in general has been that it is a throwback to the days when an I/O got lost and everything just hung. For those old enough to remember the 3330, you could pop the plug on the disk to force an interrupt to wake it up. IBM added the MIH to say basically, that if I haven't h

Re: debug tool comparison

2007-01-29 Thread Howard Brazee
On 29 Jan 2007 09:03:38 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chase, John) wrote: >AFAIK they're all SMP/E-installed, so in that regard all are equally >"easy" to install and maintain. As to "ease of use", the one with which >you have the most experience will be "easiest to use". Very true. The hardest pa

Re: SORT - Logical EOF on SORTIN

2007-01-29 Thread Frank Yaeger
Gilbert Saint-Flour wrote on 01/29/2007 07:25:01 AM: > I am looking for a way to tell DFSORT to stop reading the SORTIN > data set when > it reaches a record with X'' in pos 1-2. I looked at the latest DFSORT > doc but didn't see anything that could help me, other than an E15 exit, which > is

Re: setting LE runtime options programatically.

2007-01-29 Thread Lizette Koehler
In z/OS V1.4 the only option I know of is the CEEUOPT that is linked into the program. This does not allow you to change anything at run time. However, if you have some static parms, then you may be able put those into the CEEUOPT and then just add the ones you need on the Execution statement

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Skip Robinson
I didn't see anything in this thread about WHY you want to do this, but you seem to have ruled out the simpler, safer techniques. I hate to say it, but if you have to ask for a more sophisticated approach, you probably should not even try it. We ran a superbly (RYO) written load module trace a

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread David Andrews
I guess that since this has to be foolproof, then the only way to address the problem is to exclude the, um, fools. Protect the program libraries in question, then allow only a closely audited user to execute the programs -- and then only via your shim. -- David Andrews A. Duda and Sons, Inc. [E

Re: setting LE runtime options programatically.

2007-01-29 Thread Jim McAlpine
I honestly haven't a clue. From what little I have been able to glean (and there isn't much info available) we need to run with POSIX(ON) and XPLINK(ON) for any program that invokes Java. I'm presuming also that we should have these options switched off when running non-Java programs. Jim McAlp

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Charles Mills
I guess for any of these approaches, the question becomes "how tight does this have to be/how clever (or malicious) are your users?" I think there is probably a tradeoff between how hard it is to do and maintain versus how well it addresses the question in this paragraph. We have not even mentione

Re: debug tool comparison

2007-01-29 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Brigitte Pruett > > I have been assigned the task to research debug tool for our > shop. We are mostly an LE COBOL shop and do batch and CICS > processing equaly. I reviewed IBM debug tool, xpediter, > Ca-Intertest,

Re: getting control

2007-01-29 Thread john gilmore
There are no good, i.e., both usually effective and not easily circumvented, solutions of this problem, however important you may judge it to be. Shakespeare had the final word, long ago: Diseases desperate grown, Are by desperate remedies reliev'd, Or not at all. John Gilmore Ashland, MA 0

Re: setting LE runtime options programatically.

2007-01-29 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine > > Yes thanks, I'm aware of that but I'm also thinking that we > may need to switch the runtime options back again after > return from the Java program. > This is a long running batch job which sits an

AW: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Jon Renton
Circumnavigation could be a problem - especially in areas such as SOX compliance. Certain actions must be logged without exception. This is where I need to go! That means calls from JCL, Programs, REXX, Clists, ... must all be captured. One risk can of course never be fully controlled - a highl

debug tool comparison

2007-01-29 Thread Brigitte Pruett
I have been assigned the task to research debug tool for our shop. We are mostly an LE COBOL shop and do batch and CICS processing equaly. I reviewed IBM debug tool, xpediter, Ca-Intertest,ASG-SmartTest; they appear to all be somewhat equal in functionalities. So now I am trying, unsuccessfully

AW: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Jon Renton
Charles, only problem with this approach is that the user can call the original module ($A) directly and avoid my code. This would be a major loophole! Regards Jon -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Charles Mills Gesendet

Re: setting LE runtime options programatically.

2007-01-29 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 10:14 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: setting LE runtime options programatically. > > > We have just started down the road of trying

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Craddock, Chris
> I am looking for a way to prevent users calling certain load modules > directly. Instead I would like my module to get control. This module can > then perform certain tasks before passing control to the user requested > processing module. Ah "the hook". This question is as old as the operating s

Re: setting LE runtime options programatically.

2007-01-29 Thread Jim McAlpine
Yes, I've seen an example of using putenv but I also need to change LE runtime options also. Unfortunately we are still at z/OS 1.4 for the moment. Jim McAlpine On 1/29/07, Steve Comstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, you can certainly change environment variables dynamically. You can eit

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread David Andrews
> I am looking for a way to prevent users calling certain load modules > directly. Instead I would like my module to get control. As John McKown says, this is hard to make foolproof. But you can cover at least one vector pretty easily: if your users are executing the load module directly via JCL,

Re: setting LE runtime options programatically.

2007-01-29 Thread Jim McAlpine
Yes thanks, I'm aware of that but I'm also thinking that we may need to switch the runtime options back again after return from the Java program. This is a long running batch job which sits and waits for work and could be running all day running mostly non-java work, but occasionally having to inv

Re: setting LE runtime options programatically.

2007-01-29 Thread Steve Comstock
Jim McAlpine wrote: We have just started down the road of trying to invoke java classes from batch COBOL but have hit a problem with the 100 character PARM field length because we need to specify several runtime options such as ENVAR=, POSIX(ON) AND XPLINK(ON) on top of our own parameters. I

Re: SORT - Logical EOF on SORTIN

2007-01-29 Thread Reda, John
Sorry, there is a formatting error in my post. There should NOT be a blank line between the SUM and OUTFIL control cards. Sincerely, John Reda Software Services Manager Syncsort Inc. 201-930-8260 > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Charles Mills
How about some sort of scheme in which you alias your program as A, and re-name program A to $A? So when the user runs A, s/he gets your program, which then links to the old A? In this approach or the one suggested by John, you could turn the function on and off with a system variable or a parm fi

Re: HTTP server and JAVA Serverpac question

2007-01-29 Thread Johnston, Robert E
Thanks Shane and Roland for the advice. I think I understand about /etc/profile and $PATH:$JAVA_HOME/bin. We are a pretty simple monoplex but I want to set things up the best way that I can. As I mentioned in a previous post for help, this is my first full base serverpac (with IBM's tcpip). And we

Re: setting LE runtime options programatically.

2007-01-29 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine > > We have just started down the road of trying to invoke java > classes from batch COBOL but have hit a problem with the 100 > character PARM field length because we need to specify > several runtime

Re: SORT - Logical EOF on SORTIN

2007-01-29 Thread Reda, John
The following solution will work with SyncSort and should work with DFSORT also. It requires 2 passes of the data but if the data volume is not large than this should not present a problem. In English, the approach taken is to have STEP1 build the SORT control card to be used by STEP2 (the step t

Re: LU definition for TN3270 printer(3287)

2007-01-29 Thread Johnny Luo
Thanks, Roberto. What you gave me is the APPL definition for the printer and I need another APPL for the FSS Infoprint uses. After that, it works. On 1/29/07, Roberto Halais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For my printers I use: NETSPRT1 APPL EAS=1,SESSLIM=YES,DLOGMOD=SCS,LOSTERM=IMMED -

setting LE runtime options programatically.

2007-01-29 Thread Jim McAlpine
We have just started down the road of trying to invoke java classes from batch COBOL but have hit a problem with the 100 character PARM field length because we need to specify several runtime options such as ENVAR=, POSIX(ON) AND XPLINK(ON) on top of our own parameters. Is there a way to chan

FICON CTC MIH

2007-01-29 Thread Alan C. Field
The archive search and I aren't getting along this morning. Are there any recommendations for a MIH value for FICON CTCs? We haven't got anything specified in IECIOSxx but are having some difficulty getting VARY commands to them to complete. We're wondering if there is a recommendation

SORT - Logical EOF on SORTIN

2007-01-29 Thread Gilbert Saint-Flour
Hello: I am looking for a way to tell DFSORT to stop reading the SORTIN data set when it reaches a record with X'' in pos 1-2. I looked at the latest DFSORT doc but didn't see anything that could help me, other than an E15 exit, which is precisely what I'm trying to stay clear of. Any ide

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:40:20 +0100 Jon Renton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :>a "relink" is not an option as I would like to enable/disable my function :>dynamically (at least from IPL to IPL) and some of the load modules are :>third party software - ie. I do not want to change these! You can use so

Re: SAE and SAR with Visara

2007-01-29 Thread Bruce Black
We are attempting to get SAE R12 - and FDR-SAR 54.50 as well - to 'find' the console attached to a Visara 25S console/communications controller. Both work fine using a 3174-1L and dumb terminal, IPLing from either tape or CD. It seems like the CHPID just won't come alive. This is an EMIF CH

Re: JCL Question

2007-01-29 Thread Howard Brazee
On 29 Jan 2007 02:59:56 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J R) wrote: >Also, there are two dataset disposition fields -- normal and abnormal. >The one that you specified is normal. If you want to specify what happens >in an abend scenario, you need to code a second one. > >e.g. DISP=(MOD,KEEP,DELETE) Or

Re: Overriding SDATA options for SLIP

2007-01-29 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Mulder > > IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on > 01/29/2007 09:08:47 AM: > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Mulder > > > > > > [ snip ] > > > > > > I

Re: Overriding SDATA options for SLIP

2007-01-29 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Comstock > > Jim Mulder wrote: > > [snip] > > > > No matter how many times I proofread before posting, I still can't > > seem to find all the typos. > > When we teach a class, we tell the students we will pa

Re: Overriding SDATA options for SLIP

2007-01-29 Thread Bruce Black
I'm convinced you never get rid of the last typo. Just like one never gets rid of the last bug. Amen! -- Bruce A. Black Senior Software Developer for FDR Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300 personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tech support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.

Re: Overriding SDATA options for SLIP

2007-01-29 Thread Steve Comstock
Jim Mulder wrote: [snip] No matter how many times I proofread before posting, I still can't seem to find all the typos. When we teach a class, we tell the students we will pay "a nickel a typo, dime for technical errors". It's a harmless bit of fun, but I'm continually amazed at the little

Re: Overriding SDATA options for SLIP

2007-01-29 Thread Jim Mulder
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 01/29/2007 09:08:47 AM: > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Mulder > > > > [ snip ] > > > > If you are on z/OS 1.7 or higher, you can tell if the system > > was quiesced for a particular dump using IPCS: >

AW: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Jon Renton
John, a "relink" is not an option as I would like to enable/disable my function dynamically (at least from IPL to IPL) and some of the load modules are third party software - ie. I do not want to change these! Regards Jon -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mail

Re: AOPBATCH Continuation character

2007-01-29 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, "Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3)" said: > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:18:06 +0100 > > 3. The LE runtime runs in the C locale with CP1047 by default. >You can tell it to do otherwiese with: > >//STEP1EXEC PGM=AOPBATCH, >// PARM='ENVAR("LC_ALL=De_DE.IBM-273")/sh'

SAE and SAR with Visara

2007-01-29 Thread Gary Gentzel
We are attempting to get SAE R12 - and FDR-SAR 54.50 as well - to 'find' the console attached to a Visara 25S console/communications controller. Both work fine using a 3174-1L and dumb terminal, IPLing from either tape or CD. It seems like the CHPID just won't come alive. This is an EMIF CHP

Re: Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Renton > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 7:23 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Getting control > > > Hello, > > I am looking for a way to prevent users calling certain load mo

Re: Overriding SDATA options for SLIP

2007-01-29 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Mulder > > [ snip ] > > If you are on z/OS 1.7 or higher, you can tell if the system > was quiesced for a particular dump using IPCS: > > VERBX IEAVTSFS > > System reset dispatchable 09/17/2042 23:53

Getting control

2007-01-29 Thread Jon Renton
Hello, I am looking for a way to prevent users calling certain load modules directly. Instead I would like my module to get control. This module can then perform certain tasks before passing control to the user requested processing module. Here as a simple flow: - User calls module "A" - My m

Re: LU definition for TN3270 printer(3287)

2007-01-29 Thread Matthew Stitt
InfoPrint Server prints directly to printers which have an IP address assigned to them. It appears you are trying to use the SNA printer interface feature, which is designed to direct print to older coaxial cable connected printers. The example provided by Roberto is used for NetSpool, a part of

Re: EXTERNAL INTERRUPT and SAPL

2007-01-29 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/26/2007 at 01:30 PM, "R.S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Everytime I read software manual, i.e. MVS Diagnosis, and the manual >decribes some actions on "hardware side", I find completely unclear >and usually obsolete explanations. Then submit an RCF. -- Sh

Re: ECSA and Common Page Size

2007-01-29 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/24/2007 at 06:06 PM, George D Dranes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >I'm currently in the process of trying to tune CSA, ECSA and Common >Page Size and was looking for some recommendations. Unless you are close to the edge for private storage above the line, I would

  1   2   >