Joel,
You must have missed my solution from a couple of days ago. It uses six (6)
instructions with minimal table space.
Here it is again.
MVC OBUFF,IBYTECopy the byte to be converted@xxn
MVC OBUFF+1(7),OBUFF@xxn
*
Rick Fochtman wrote:
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:13:09 -0800, Tom Simons wrote:
Here's 8 instructions to translate 8 bits to 8 chars of 1's or 0's:
LAR3,8
ICR5,INBYTE
SLL R5,24
LOOP SLL R4,3
SLDL R4,1
BCT R3,LOOP
Chris,
Just to illustrate your point about being a waste of time, I want to
relate a story from a long time ago when I worked at the State of
California, CALTRANs. At the time, memory was very expensive, and we
were running a S360/60 I believe with one megabyte of real storage under
OS/MVT. It was
On 14 Dec 2007 09:50:22 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Corneel
Booysen) wrote:
>So I wonder if it is true that the original name of "HAL" was really a
>dig at IBM. (As in each letter of the name is one place higher
>alphabetically than the letters in IBM. Remember the evil computer
>killed all the peop
On 14 Dec 2007 09:32:53 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rick Fochtman)
wrote:
>We know the speed of light; what's the speed of dark?
A Nebula award winning novel with an autistic hero - written by a
space opera writer with an autistic son.
--
Tom,
I liked your solution. Truly ingenious!
It might get just a bit shorter by using ICM instead of the IC+SLL:
ICM R5,B'1000',INBYTE
-Victor-
Date:Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:13:09 -0800
From:Tom Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Su
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:49:28 -0500, Craddock, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>...
>I don't mind that you disagree with me Rick, but if you're expecting
>vendors (or anyone else) to provide reliable and detailed storage
>estimates you're going to be permanently disappointed.
I've been disappoin
I wrote:
>So it is! I spoke too soon then. Congratulations, Apple and Mac OS X: you
>beat z/OS by 7 days it appears. :-)
and it appears Apple didn't. The update is called "Java for Mac OS X
10.4, Release 6." It's available here:
http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/apple/macosx_updates/java
Paul Schuster wrote:
Did the meaning of this bit change recently?
I used to be able to detect an AMODE 24 program by the absence of this bit
being on, but now in a z/os 1.9 system (and maybe earlier) I see an AMODE
24 program with the RBOPSW31 bit on.
The meaning of RBOPSW31 has not chang
Jim says
> Well, I type too slowly to do much flaming. And of course, I am
> willing to discuss this in great detail any time you come to
> Poughkeepsie and take me out for a beer.
You're so shallow :-) But I'll buy you a beer anyway.
> However, I am at somewhat
> of a loss to figure out how
Did the meaning of this bit change recently?
I used to be able to detect an AMODE 24 program by the absence of this bit
being on, but now in a z/os 1.9 system (and maybe earlier) I see an AMODE
24 program with the RBOPSW31 bit on.
Thank you.
Paul
-
Rick says
> I disagree with CC. If a vendor can't tell me how much storage is
> needed, I get VERY LEERY. I can't afford (when I'm working, at least)
to
> have a storage hog that might adversely affect performance of my
entire
> image. Not only do I have to be concerned about storage creep in
> pro
Ed Gould wrote:
To me this comes down to the difference between the PC world and the
mainframe.
Exactly! Mainframe resource allocation policies were established in a
world in which computer resources were scarce and _extremely_ expensive!
A paradigm shift is needed!
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoeni
On Dec 14, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Michael Poil wrote:
SNIP---
Sometimes it is impossible to do that as is the case with Java. The
amount
of storage used within the JVM has a static component based on user
definitions, but after that it is a function of what the Java
progra
There is a Hercules discussion group on Yahoo (www.yahoogroups.com).
There are some of the developers on that group.
Ken G.
Sergio Lima wrote:
Hello List,
Normally, my questions put here, have a fast response.
About my question, I imagine, that here is not a go
Tony Harminc wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:48:08 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Please see David Bond's excellent presentation from SHARE 107 in
Baltimore entitled, "Session 8192: Coding Assembler for Performance".
http://shareew.prod.web.sba.com/client_files/callpapers/attach/SHARE_in_Baltimore
John,
You can look at an old informational apar II10372 in setting up your basic
sysplex. There are advantages and disadvantages to both. A parallel sysplex
will definitely take the load off of your other lpars by loading the LOGR
structure in memory. You also have the ability to run true VS
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:48:08 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
>Please see David Bond's excellent presentation from SHARE 107 in
>Baltimore entitled, "Session 8192: Coding Assembler for Performance".
>http://shareew.prod.web.sba.com/client_files/callpapers/attach/SHARE_in_Baltimore/S8192DB073718.pdf
Wha
I'm sure Bruce Black would have know this off the top of his head. (RIP,
Bruce.)
Off the top of mine, IIRC, DCBFDAD needs to be set to your "high water" mark
when you close your DCB after writing. CLOSE will see that the relative disk
address (TTR) then makes it into DS1LSTAR in the VTOC. Yo
>I think I found an old "Setting up a Sysplex" handy - from before it went
>"parallel-centric"; maybe 2.10-ish, early z/OS.
I think it was earlier than that.
We set up our first parallel SYSPLEX in October 1994, using that manual as a
'bible'.
If basic was in it, I don't remember seeing that.
An
I tested SMF Logstream during ESP and would describe it:
PROs:
1. Eliminates a lot of fiddle-faddle with getting MAN datasets sized and
dumped.
2. Will write to multiple logstreams, so "interesting" data can be isolated
and/or Duplicated into its own logstream.
3. The IFASE
I'm writing some code to do random access file I/O using EXCP and
generally all is going well, but I have a couple of issues.
I'm managing the dcbfdad field of the DCB as I write the dataset, but
the ISPF dialogs always report that the dataset space utilisation is 0.
Allocation reports OK, but
Oops! In re-reading this, I see an error. :-[
I wrote:
The BTB keeps only those branches _predicted to be_ taken ...
This should say, "The BTB keeps only those branches _actually_ taken ..."
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 9
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 12:43 -0600, McKown, John wrote:
> Is there anywhere to read up on setting up a BASIC sysplex (not a
> Parallel Sysplex)? Looks like the cost of the CFL has destroyed our
> likelihood of implementing a parallel sysplex. IIRC, a basic sysplex
> only requires CTCs, which I alrea
I would agree with you Mike. In our case, and this was single instance
WebSphere, I was unable to do any precise predetermination of storage
requirements prior to implementation. We had IBM WAS, vendor software and CTG.
Not that CTG was going to kill us from a requirements viewpoint. Before I wa
On Dec 14, 2007, at 11:38 AM, Rick Fochtman wrote:
-SNIP-
--
That's a lot like asking "How high is the sky?" Much depends on the
number of datasets you envision on the volume. I always chose the
most heavily used volumes in
Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:13:09 -0800, Tom Simons wrote:
Here's 8 instructions to translate 8 bits to 8 chars of 1's or 0's:
LAR3,8
IC
Well, I couldn't get to that site. I got a cannot display message.
However, the official Kubrickfilms/Warnerbros site here
http://kubrickfilms.warnerbros.com/video_detail/2001/ verifies that in
their FAQ section saying this.
What do the letters HAL stand for?
HAL stands for "Heuristically progra
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:32:09 -0600, Rick Fochtman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>---
>We know the speed of light; what's the speed of dark?
>
A bit slower than it was. Terry Pratchett has been diagnosed with
early onset Alzheimer's. All 8 shades of black are about to get a
lot slower.
Pa
>
I disagree with CC. If a vendor can't tell me how much storage is
needed, I get VERY LEERY. I can't afford (when I'm working, at least) to
have a storage hog that might adversely affect performance of my entire
image. Not only do I have to be concerned about storage creep in
programs, my othe
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Stitt
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 2:16 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: basic sysplex information?
>
>
> You really do not need a CFL engine. A regular CP will w
You really do not need a CFL engine. A regular CP will work. And I am sure
you can now set the CF up to utilize the CP only when it has work to do.
This is the way I run my CF, but I have not tried the dynamic CP usage part yet.
For a basic sysplex, all you really need are the PATHIN and PATHOU
>
> Go to IPCS panel option 4 (Inventory), and put LD in the AC
> column for your dump of interest. In the ListDump output,
> find the ranges for the dataspace of interest, and see if
> the 01823000 page is included in a range. If so, then the
> problem probably lies in IPCS. If not, the pro
Amen!
My IEFUSI (not yet updated for storage above the bar reasonably large
defaults are provided through SMFPRM00) makes REGION a binary switch.
You either get my generous defaults or you code REGION=0M and we give
you everything can less a buffer for recovery.REGION ABEND's are a
waste of h
To follow-up on the case here when a DB2 DBA accidently overcommitted
storage to DB2 an APAR PK58272 is now open against DB2 to provide a WTO
message that can be automated to notify and escalate if a DBA does this
and gets the message DSNB542I.
PK58272 MAKE DSNB542I A WTO MESSAGE, SO THAT THE CHEC
On Dec 14, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Kelman, Tom wrote:
How about something simple like "HAL" ala "2001: A Space Odyssey".
Tom Kelman
Commerce Bank of Kansas City
(816) 760-7632
Tom:
An idea but I think it won't get past the PR people as HAL turned out
to be not so good.
Ed
-
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 12/13/2007
03:53:12 PM:
> I have an SRB application that issued an SDUMPX macro (in AR mode). It
> specifies a particular dataspace token with a single range, starting
address
> of X?? and ending range of X?7FFF?. The SDUMPX completes
> nor
Thanks Rick for your help.
"Adams, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Willie,
You can run a
LIST TTOC SELECT(ML2 NOTFULL) ODS(your.output.dataset)
This will list all of the PARTIAL volumes. You can then issue a
DELVOL volser MIGRATION(MARKFULL)
This will make them full to HSM and it will not
What I really would like to know is what will I be missing in the basic
sysplex that exists in the parallel sysplex.
GRS Star
Enhanced Catalog Sharing
Probably others I can't recall off hand...
HTH,
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Art Celestini wrote:
Another interesting example, as discussed earlier, is LHI vs. LA. It too, has
the condition code consideration. However, consider the use of LA in the
following arithmetic (non-address) situation:
LA R1,789(R2,R3)
To do this without LA would take something like:
Is there anywhere to read up on setting up a BASIC sysplex (not a
Parallel Sysplex)? Looks like the cost of the CFL has destroyed our
likelihood of implementing a parallel sysplex. IIRC, a basic sysplex
only requires CTCs, which I already have.
What I really would like to know is what will I be mi
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
>
> Tom Marchant wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:13:09 -0800, Tom Simons wrote:
> >
> >>Here's 8 instructions to translate 8 bits to 8 chars of 1's or 0's:
> >>
> >>LAR3,8
> >>IC
No, they denied it. See here:
http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/faq/index.html#slot7
Jon
I don't know if it was a dig, but Arthur C. Clark and Stanley Kubrek did
admit HAL was based on IBM's name.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
>So I wonder if it is true that the original name of "HAL" was really a dig at
>IBM.
(Sorry about the previous [blank] post)
I don't know if it was a dig, but Arthur C. Clark and Stanley Kubrek did admit
HAL was based on IBM's name.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
>
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-ma
Thanks, Ed. I seemed to remember that there was a later "version" of the
microprocessor discussion, I just couldn't find it quickly.
The "problem" is that things can change in subtile ways from one processor
generation to the next. I've therefore adopted a general "KISS" approach --
within
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:04:50 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
"BC/BRC-type are statically predicted not-taken (except if the mask is
'F'x), BCT, BXLE, and BXH-type are statically guessed taken. For
BC/BRC-type this is correct about 55% of the time for most code and
BCT/BXLE-t
So I wonder if it is true that the original name of "HAL" was really a
dig at IBM. (As in each letter of the name is one place higher
alphabetically than the letters in IBM. Remember the evil computer
killed all the people...
Never mind me - I did not sleep either :-)
-Original Message-
-
Why the UNPRINTABLE should services for what should be a basic data set
type NOT be in the Nucleus?
That all depends on how large you want NIP and the nucleus to be.
Personally, I'd rather not see my IPL
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:13:09 -0800, Tom Simons wrote:
Here's 8 instructions to translate 8 bits to 8 chars of 1's or 0's:
LAR3,8
ICR5,INBYTE
SLL R5,24
LOOP SLL R4,3
SLDL R4,1
BCT R3,LOOP
STR4,OUTCHAR
I'm about to start migrating from 3390-3 to 3390-9 and I'm concerned about
VTOC and index sizes.
Currently I am allocating 7 cyl VTOC and 3 cyl Index. I come from a VSE
background where it was pretty easy to determine the size you needed, all
bas
-
For me, it's Friday morning. I haven't slept well due to a restless dog.
And I'm insane.
---
Aren't we ALL just a little insane? Look what we're doing for a living,
what with these "dead" systems? :-)
---
We know th
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:04:50 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
>
>"BC/BRC-type are statically predicted not-taken (except if the mask is
>'F'x), BCT, BXLE, and BXH-type are statically guessed taken. For
>BC/BRC-type this is correct about 55% of the time for most code and
>BCT/BXLE-type are correct 90+% o
John Eells wrote:
Steven Conway wrote:
I agree with CC that having jobs blow due to limited storage is
archaic. John's suggestion of a "warn mode" is outstanding. And,
it's heartening for Martin to tell us people within IBM are looking
at this issue.
I hate to make this my last post bef
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/01/2007
at 06:19 PM, "Patrick O'Keefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
The above reduces the likelyhood of
>Of course those character string lines may or may not display as you
>intended
Only if the vi
Another point to consider is the size of the VVDS if the volume is to be
managed by SMS.
George Shedlock Jr
AEGON Information Technology
AEGON USA
502-560-3541
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Pace
Sent: Friday, December
Art Celestini wrote:
Much of what I was talking about is described here:
http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd/446/webb.html
although even this paper is somewhat "dated" by now.
Art, I suggest you take a look at
http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/journal/rd/483/slegel.html. Nearly all
of wh
Tad off subject...
Anyone look at the smf logger facility or try using it yet??
pro's/con's or what to watch for would be helpful ..
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender
Hi Bill,
CA SMF Director can be set up either way, although it is best to have the
automated dumping feature active on all LPARs. Please keep in mind that if the
Control Data Set (SCDS) is going to be shared among LPARs, that all of the
LPARs must be in the same GRS scheme.
There are ways t
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Art Celestini
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8:49 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Mainframe Assembler Coding Contest
>
>
> Much of what I was talking about is described her
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Art Celestini
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 9:49 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Mainframe Assembler Coding Contest
>
> Much of what I was talking about is described here:
>
>
>
> If you're combining 3390-3 volumes, check to see how much of the VTOC is
> used on the mod 3's that you're combining using ISPF 3.4.
>
> Not that a cylinder or 2 is much space on a mod 9, but all of the mod
> 9's that I have here except my ML1 volumes are defined with 74 tracks
> for the VTOC
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kelman, Tom
>
> How about something simple like "HAL" ala "2001: A Space Odyssey".
Probably not available (in the US) for 50 years plus Arthur C. Clarke's
remaining lifetime, due to copyright
-jc-
-
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/01/2007
at 07:18 AM, Steve Comstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>There are 13 EBCDIC characters that vary across EBCDIC character map
>codepages but that must always be defined when using locale settings;
ITYM ¬ rather than ^; certainly ¬, ¢ and £ are all problema
I looking into the best way to implement this product across multiple
CEC's/LPARS. Do I need to have it running on all LPARS or can I run it on one
and send the SMF data to it?
Bill Shelaga
Mainframe,Technical Specialist
The contents of this communication, including any attachment(s), are
conf
Mark,
If you're combining 3390-3 volumes, check to see how much of the VTOC is
used on the mod 3's that you're combining using ISPF 3.4.
Not that a cylinder or 2 is much space on a mod 9, but all of the mod
9's that I have here except my ML1 volumes are defined with 74 tracks
for the VTOC and 1
How about something simple like "HAL" ala "2001: A Space Odyssey".
Tom Kelman
Commerce Bank of Kansas City
(816) 760-7632
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Chase, John
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8:04 AM
> To: IBM-MA
Much of what I was talking about is described here:
http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd/446/webb.html
although even this paper is somewhat "dated" by now. My understanding is that
the z9
class microprocessors have a much deeper (longer) pipeline, and the logic that
looks at
instructions ver
All
Update #5 - All z390 mainframe assembler coding contest solutions have been
reformatted using new ZMFACC macro for portability across multiple OS and
new problem and solution submission email methods. The source and
generated log files for each of the ranked solutions are now directly
acc
Mark,
>
> In VSE I could dump the VTOC(they were pretty small) and determine the
> relative amount of the space being used. I haven't figured out if there
is
> a way to determine how much of your VTOC or Index is currently being used
in
> MVS.
You can tell how many free dscbs are on a given volum
Exactly.
Jon
As in "Boss! z/PLAIN, z/PLAIN!"?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.
Depending on how things go here in the next couple of years, either
Nessus or Laomedon.
Jon
Any nominations? :-)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
Hi Bill and Paul (and everyone else on the list!)
I'm the lead developer on CA SMF Director. If you have any specific
questions about the product I'll be happy to answer them, either on the
list or off-list.
Mike Livingston
Senior Software Engineer
CA
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mai
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Brock
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8:32 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: The future of PDSs
>
>
> Instead of z/BASIC, it should be "z/PLAIN."
>
> Jon
As in "Boss! z/
Instead of z/BASIC, it should be "z/PLAIN."
Jon
z/BASIC, z/DEVELOPER, z/BUSINESS, z/ENTERPRISE, and of course z/ULTIMATE
.
Keep in mind that I'm in the U.S.A. where we pronounce "z" as "zee", not
"zed". Also keep in mind the bad German accent in English movies where
"zee" is "the".
Martin and John, I understand and agree with what your responses, and
"celebration" is possibly an over-statement. Half the battle, at times,
is getting acknowledgement from a vendor that an issue really is an issue,
and not just customer whining.
Not that we ever have that here, of course.
On 13 Dec 2007 04:34:08 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>It is certain that PDS's will exist for the entire life of z/OS (or
>whatever name it might have down the road, if that ever changes again).
>
>It is almost certain that PDSEs will never be allowed in the LPALST
>(chicken and egg
Willie,
You can run a
LIST TTOC SELECT(ML2 NOTFULL) ODS(your.output.dataset)
This will list all of the PARTIAL volumes. You can then issue a
DELVOL volser MIGRATION(MARKFULL)
This will make them full to HSM and it will not need to call the
secondary copy that is offsite. I would do this be
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:29:36 -0600, Patrick O'Keefe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:56:33 -0500, Pinnacle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>...
>>The Rexx Alternate Library is not SMP/E installable. It has no maintenance,
>>having been functionally stabilized for many years. If t
If you go to this Red Book -
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246524.pdf - it mentions the
"PDS Pain" white paper and lists the things wrong with PDS datasets.
Just do a PDF search for "PDS Pain".
However, I'd rather use a PDS than a PDSE for one that is not update
very often. You don'
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
>
> Peter Hunkeler writes:
> >Isn't it about time for one more name change since z/OS is
> approaching
> >release 10?
>
> Any nominations? :-)
"Computer" should last through the Star Trek era...
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:13:09 -0800, Tom Simons wrote:
>Here's 8 instructions to translate 8 bits to 8 chars of 1's or 0's:
>
> LAR3,8
> ICR5,INBYTE
> SLL R5,24
>LOOP SLL R4,3
> SLDL R4,1
> BCT R3,LOOP
> STR4,OUTCHAR
> U
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 19:51 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2007, at 11:36 AM, Bob Shannon wrote:
> > Refer to the "PDS Pain" white paper for what's wrong with PDSs
> Can you give us an idea where we might find it?
Dave Crow presented the "PDSPAIN White Paper" at session O232 of SHARE
70 (Anah
I'm about to start migrating from 3390-3 to 3390-9 and I'm concerned about
VTOC and index sizes.
Currently I am allocating 7 cyl VTOC and 3 cyl Index. I come from a VSE
background where it was pretty easy to determine the size you needed, all
based on the number of datasets, size of a VTOC entry.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John P Kalinich
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 6:49 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: The future of PDSs
>
>
> Timothy Sipples of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>
> wrot
John P Kalinich wrote:
Timothy Sipples of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
wrote on 12/14/2007 12:11:48 AM:
Peter Hunkeler writes:
Isn't it about time for one more name change since
z/OS is approaching release 10?
Any nominations? :-)
z/MVS for nostalgic reasons.
IMHO it will be someth
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pinnacle
>
[ snip ]
>
> The Rexx Alternate Library is not SMP/E installable.
While the standalone Web deliverable is not SMP/E-installable, the REXX
Alternate Library does have its own FMID, and if acquired with anot
Rick,
Thanks for the explanation. If I understand correctly there is nothing that
can be done? I am stuck with another problem because DFHSM requests a tape
mount (COPY2) which is our offsite copy. So far, I let the request expire. Is
there any way around this?
"Adams, Rick" <[EMAIL P
Right
I NEVER claimed to be in Development. Most people recognise the
self-evidence of that statement. :-)
John Eells wrote:
> I hate to make this my last post before the holidays, so I suppose I'll
> have to find something else to post about later today. But celebration
> for this par
Not my day. The 404 is fixed.
And after slagging off the Vole, I just got this from "a Microsoft
spokesperson":
"We believe Platform Solutions, Inc. is uniquely positioned to bridge the gap
between legacy
mainframe computing and 21st century server technology in today's enterprise
environment
Steven Conway wrote:
I agree with CC that having jobs blow due to limited storage is archaic.
John's suggestion of a "warn mode" is outstanding. And, it's heartening
for Martin to tell us people within IBM are looking at this issue.
I hate to make this my last post before the holidays, so I
Willie,
This is straight out of the manual for the SETSYS PARTIALTAPE
command:
DFSMShsm automatically marks a single-file-formatted tape volume full
(except after data set migration or data set backup)independent of the
block count when it demounts the tape. These volumes can be marked as
full
Victor,
If you issue a TAPEREPL command the alternate volume will become the
primary volume and the original primary volume will be deleted.
ThanksRick
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Victor Zhang
Sent: Thursday, Decemb
Hi all,
I have a problem which is occurring at an intermittent basis. DFHSM has
DUPLEX(MIGRATION) and we are using the parm SETSYS
PARTIALTAPE(MIGRATION(MARKFULL). We send one copy offsite. For some reason
sometimes DFHSM sets both copies to PARTIAL. I am not sure why this is
happenin
> Peter Hunkeler writes:
>>Isn't it about time for one more name change since
>>z/OS is approaching release 10?
>
> Any nominations? :-)
> z/MVS for nostalgic reasons.
> Regards,
> John K
That sounds good and I'll vote for that.
warm regards,
Raj
I can sympathize Ed. We were on the edge with WebSphere on z/OS when I believe
the freeware, v3.02, came out in 2001 and we had quite a time with problems and
support on all sides including my own due to lack of practical experience. When
I recommended, in a call to developers at our corporate s
Timothy Sipples of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
wrote on 12/14/2007 12:11:48 AM:
> Peter Hunkeler writes:
>>Isn't it about time for one more name change since
>>z/OS is approaching release 10?
>
> Any nominations? :-)
>
z/MVS for nostalgic reasons.
Regards,
John K
Interesting concept Shane. :-) Add storage controls along with CPU Crit. to WLM
and we'll have a hybrid WLM/IPS/ICS. Maybe we can call it WIPS.
Shane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just make storage a WLM managed resource.
Then we (customers) can set our own goals, and (resource) cap if
necessary,
>
>What would it take for everyone to use it?
>
>Cheers,
>
>Clement Clarke
G'day Clem,
To get a site on board for anything like JOL, takes a significant push from
management and they like to see up to date and maintainable software that
they do not have to look after themselves.
My primary reco
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
[...]
o Cross system sharing of members and data sets
That's one of the reasons why people still choose PDS.
Sharing of PDSE out of sysplex scope is actually impossible.
Sometimes PDSE performance can be worse than in PDS. See Barbara Nitz
postings related to PDSE.
Wha
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
