Ron,
Your example is an 'exception', it was decided to do it for that DS to gain the
benefit. That's OK by me.
It wasn't decided to COMP all VSAM/PS(FB/VB) DS that are over 5 CYL, which
is the case I question. I've seen thousands of GDS, under 5 Cyl, being
COMP'd, they quickly go to ML2, so
I am out of the office until 02/25/2010.
Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: SMS compression
cost size sent on 2/24/10 1:16:09.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
Call CA Support. They will be able to help on that.
You could also check support.ca.com in product
documentation section.
znor...@ca.com
-Original Message-
From: Ron Thomas [mailto:ron5...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 09:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Easytrieve..
Good point on the rename. I have a fuzzy recollection of a problem when the
server is Windows. In UNIX, a RENAME will delete the new name if it already
exists. IIRC, Windows gives a name in use error. But I could be
misremembering.
Oh, and if you just decide to delete before renaming, then
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:15:23 -0600, McKown, John wrote:
Good point on the rename. I have a fuzzy recollection of a problem when the
server is Windows. In UNIX, a RENAME will delete the new name if it already
exists. IIRC, Windows gives a name in use error. But I could be
misremembering.
Oh,
We are running z/OS 1.7 on z10. Since migrating to the z10 I have been
unable to add or change device information within HCD. In particular, panel
CBDPDV30 does not seem to parse the data correctly. For example, the 4
character CU number is split across the first two fields of the Connected to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 7:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Determining if DUMMY allocation
I wasn't picking on JES3 specifically or any one aspect of things.
Paul
Generally, one end of an FTP connection is called a server and the other is
called a client. Please unconfuse me.
I guess the confusion arises because any computer that doesn't sit on or
under someone's desk can be called a server - and I can date this semantic
distortion to an exchange
Fred,
While I cannot directly answer your question (specifically the
concurrent part), my guess is that the issue behind the question is that
you're not driving your 3590s at full speed due to ESCON channel
limitations.
We have a 3590-A50 with 4 3590-B11 transports behind it. It had a
single 17
Hi Forum team,
I know the CA-Vantage SRM Windows Client, which is a GUI installed in the PC
that is really a front-end of the z/OS CA-Vantage.
But, I my new work, they are installing the competitor product, BMC Mainview
SRM for the z/OS.
The question: Is there some GUI or Windows Client for
BMC MainView SRM does indeed have a GUI interface. I can talk specifics
offline if you wish.
Mike Spencer
BMC Software
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
MONTERO ROMERO, ENRIQUE ELOI
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010
I know the specific macro that caused (or rather, obscured) my
problem was IEFJFCBN, but there were at least two or three others with
the
same feature -- perhaps one was CVT.
I had presumed you were talking about non-mapping macros. IEFJFCBN and
CVT and many others simply default to LIST=NO
any computer that doesn't sit on or under someone's desk can be called a
server
No, no, no. It is not productive that the mainframe veterans have one
definition for server and the rest of the world has a different one. Server
is a computer science architectural term. It has nothing to do with
Does anyone on the list know what this is:
+FDBRC1211I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT FOR SUBTASK 8 FDBMSPLU
+SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=0C4 REASON CODE=0011
+ TIME=09:30:53 SEQ=5,190 CPU= ASID=0066
+ PSW AT TIME OF ERROR 078D1000 96438836 ILC 4 INTC 11
+
I have seen a version of Adventure written in Basic. I still have that
somewhere at home. Just the listing, never got around to typing it in.
Take my advice. I'm not using it. :-)
TImOTHY Hillock
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:23:47 -0500 George Rodriguez
rodrigu...@palmbeach.k12.fl.us wrote:
:Does anyone on the list know what this is:
A quite weird program that is doing
ICM1,B'0111',PSATOLD+1
Perhaps it expects to get control in 24 bit mode and is using the top byte for
a flag?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of George Rodriguez
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: What is FDBMSPLU
Does anyone on the list know what this is:
+FDBRC1211I SYMPTOM
But no matter how many ESCON channels you put on a 3590-A50, you cannot run it
at full speed. Eight ESCON channels cannot pump as much data through an A50 as
one 2Gb FICON can, IMO. The speed increase I go going from ESCON to FICON on
A50s was far more than I expected, particularly with
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:25:59 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
any computer that doesn't sit on or under someone's desk can be called a
server
No, no, no. It is not productive that the mainframe veterans have one
definition for server and the rest of the world has a different one. Server
is a
In my previous summary of arguments thus far, I forgot to note this one:
*Pro: *LPARs eliminate single points of failure.
*Con:* XRC, PPRC-XD, FLASH/COPY, METRO/MIRROR, GLOBAL/ MIRROR, now provide
recovery from instantaneous to anywhere around 4 hours and just effectively
than LPARs, if not
Thanks, it does... I've already opened a ticket with Compuware for help.
Thanks,
George Rodriguez
Specialist II - IT Solutions
Application Support / Quality Assurance
PX - 47652
(561) 357-7652 (office)
(561) 707-3496 (mobile)
School District of Palm Beach County
3348 Forest Hill Blvd.
Room B-332
I have a need to zap core, but my client does not have OMEGAMON. I searched
the CBT mods tape and came up empty. What we're trying to do is a SETPROG
LPA,ADD, but of course, there's a vector table that needs to be updated with
the address of the new module. This is not an SVC, so my only
Try CBT 149 (UCLA Utilities) or CBT179-181 (Leonard Woren). IIRC there
is a program in (SUPERZAP?) that should do what you want...
HTH,
snip
I have a need to zap core, but my client does not have OMEGAMON. I
searched
the CBT mods tape and came up empty. What we're trying to do is a
SETPROG
Hello All
We would like to send pages and or e-mails (depending on job importance)
automatically from Control-M when a job fails .
We are using a REXX Exec SMTPNOTE currently to send e-mails, we are not
running an SMTP started task.
I was curious what sort of software all ya'll were using?
Also try CBT082 and CBT086
snip
Try CBT 149 (UCLA Utilities) or CBT179-181 (Leonard Woren). IIRC there
is a program in (SUPERZAP?) that should do what you want...
HTH,
snip
I have a need to zap core, but my client does not have OMEGAMON. I
searched
the CBT mods tape and came up empty. What
I have a need to zap core, but my client does not have OMEGAMON. I
searched the CBT mods tape and came up empty. What we're trying to do is
a SETPROG LPA,ADD, but of course, there's a vector table that needs to be
updated with the address of the new module. This is not an SVC, so my only
Rez,
Do you have a analysis of what Compression cost/dsn?
Regards,
Tobias Cafiero
Data Resource Management
Tel: (212) 855-1117
R Hey sys...@yahoo.com
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
02/24/2010 03:16 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion
Martin - surely you have missed out the last step :
Make it authorized. Switch to key zero. Verify the storage. Alter the storage.
Switch back to user key. Exit..er...IPL
:-)
Rob Scott
Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.617.614.2305
Email:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Lucy Arnold
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 10:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Paging Software
Hello All
We would like to send pages and or e-mails (depending on job importance)
I thought the TEST function of TSO could do this as well?
Lizette
Try CBT 149 (UCLA Utilities) or CBT179-181 (Leonard Woren). IIRC there
is a program in (SUPERZAP?) that should do what you want...
HTH,
snip
I have a need to zap core, but my client does not have OMEGAMON. I
searched
the
Okay, I said I would not clutter the list again with this but I will respond
to your question. BTW, I am not asking for IBM to change anything other than
a mindset that thinks a local unique feature (LIST=) that duplicates a
well-known global feature (NOGEN) is a good thing.
What error messages
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of john gilmore
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 1:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Best practice for 24-bit storage in assembler called from
C/C++
Snipped
The absence of this
Tom Conley of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 02/24/2010 10:21:07 AM:
I have a need to zap core, but my client does not have OMEGAMON. I
searched
the CBT mods tape and came up empty. What we're trying to do is a
SETPROG
LPA,ADD, but of course, there's a vector
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:21:07 -0500 Pinnacle pinnc...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
:I have a need to zap core, but my client does not have OMEGAMON. I searched
:the CBT mods tape and came up empty. What we're trying to do is a SETPROG
:LPA,ADD, but of course, there's a vector table that needs to be
Martin - surely you have missed out the last step :
Make it authorized. Switch to key zero. Verify the storage. Alter the
storage. Switch back to user key. Exit..er...IPL
Never resulted in an IPL with my own such code . :)
Charles
No, no, no ...
I trust you read the whole of my post and noticed that I became irritated by
this *misuse* of the word. It may have been more than irritated actually -
tempered finally by my having to point out to these good security people that
they had managed to get hold of some
On 24 February 2010 11:52, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
What's the big deal? you say. Any experienced assembler programmer should
be able to figure that out. But that's only true if you have a clue where
the error might be. Here's the situation I was in: a whole bunch of brand
new
Paul
Size doesn't matter? For example, consider X11, where the terms are widely
misused. I have X11 clients on z/OS communicating with an X11 server on my
laptop (with an Intel chip).
You don't get away with that one! X windows is the example of client-
server that teachers use in order to be
We are using TelAlert (was from Telamon now I think it is MIR3). Software runs
on a windows box. From the mainframe, I have some rexx code to do a TCP/IP
socket call to the PC (REXEC basically). In the command stream is information
on what group to page and the message to send. TelAlert
Tom
IMMSMC:
If it's a 360 Model 40, there are some nice tactile switches it's a pleasure to
flip on the front of the machine.
If it's a 360 Model 30 there are some tacky dials on the front of the machine.
I'm afraid those were the only two models with *core* with which I ever got
to play -
Why not run the SMTP STC? It works.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Lucy Arnold
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:40 AM
To:
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
charl...@mcn.org (Charles Mills) writes:
Yes, I know everyone is defensive because a fad usually referred to as
client/server cost a lot of us our jobs about
On 2010-02-23 at 21:25 concerning Re: Consolidate Storage Groups,
Ted MacNeil eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote to IBM-Main :
Naturally, we're not at production yet with its
performance/placement considerations.
What performance/placement considerations?
With cache/fast DASD/FICON, what's left?
Neel,
ps. my plan without much detail : DB2 StoGroup, Guaranteed SC,
quiesced volume(s) in same SG as normal.
My experience with DB2 stogroup specifying real volsers and guaranteed
space=yes was that all datasets allocated would go to the first volume until
the allocation would exceed the high
It's not free, but z/XDC will do the trick. Even more, it can also
zap storage that's been made
read only (such as the PLPA, read-only sections of the nucleus,
and any other page that has been made read-only by the PGSER macro).
If your client has z/XDC, then this would be an easy way to
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
chrisma...@belgacom.net (Chris Mason) writes:
If it's a 360 Model 40, there are some nice tactile switches it's a pleasure
to
flip on the front of the machine.
On 24 February 2010 11:49, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
I thought the TEST function of TSO could do this as well?
No - not even TESTAUTH will zap protected storage. You can, however,
write a tiny program (one instruction, perhaps) that then runs under
TESTAUTH to do the dirty
If the customer has SYSPROG Services from BMC they can perform the ZAP.
Mike Spencer
BMC Software
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Tony Harminc
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 12:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:21:07 -0500, Pinnacle pinnc...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
I have a need to zap core, but my client does not have OMEGAMON. I searched
the CBT mods tape and came up empty. What we're trying to do is a SETPROG
LPA,ADD, but of course, there's a vector table that needs to be
Dave,
We don't want to get a bunch of SPAM that fills up the spool Q.
Lucy
From: Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 02/24/2010 11:05 AM
Subject:Re: Paging Software
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Why not run
In a message dated 2/24/2010 3:07:56 P.M. Central Standard Time,
lucy.arn...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu writes:
We don't want to get a bunch of SPAM that fills up the spool Q.
Might look at Lionel's XMITP at _www.lbdsoftware.com_
(http://www.lbdsoftware.com) He's got instructions on how to
run
On 24 Feb 2010 07:26:51 -0800, charl...@mcn.org (Charles Mills) wrote:
No, no, no. It is not productive that the mainframe veterans have one
definition for server and the rest of the world has a different one. Server
is a computer science architectural term. It has nothing to do with the size
or
Kinda like Primary LU and Secondary LU in SNA lingo.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Howard Brazee howard.bra...@cusys.eduwrote:
On 24 Feb 2010 07:26:51 -0800, charl...@mcn.org (Charles Mills) wrote:
No, no, no. It is not productive that the mainframe veterans have one
definition for server
You can easily block incoming e-mail. How to do it is in the ibm-main or
ibmtcp-l archives.
Tom Sipusic
Lucy Arnold wrote:
Dave,
We don't want to get a bunch of SPAM that fills up the spool Q.
Lucy
From: Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 02/24/2010
In listserv%201002221730189473.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 02/22/2010
at 05:30 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Would you be surprised if someone had an EMACS version?
No.
Would you be surprised if no one had an EMACS version?
No.
EMACS is a wonderful operating system; all that it's
In of9f900a3a.e257dd9e-on882576d3.00708cc7-882576d3.0071e...@kp.org, on
02/23/2010
at 12:44 PM, jack.hamil...@kp.org said:
And I liked WYLBUR.
My problem is that I like features in several different editors[1],
including SuperWylbur©, but no single editor combines all of them. I
prefer line
In ofaee62f43.70af0c31-on852576d4.004a6e5c-852576d4.00542...@us.ibm.com,
on 02/24/2010
at 10:19 AM, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com said:
I had presumed you were talking about non-mapping macros. IEFJFCBN and
CVT and many others simply default to LIST=NO which is what many coders
desire.
In b53f38421002230756r50f66628r28ec6b31bfc9d...@mail.gmail.com, on
02/23/2010
at 10:56 AM, George Henke gahe...@gmail.com said:
Intelligent people can disagree and still be friends.
But they don't misrepresent their friends' positions.
but I do know we can do better than just LPARs for the
In m3ocjfgadq@garlic.com, on 02/23/2010
at 11:55 AM, Anne Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com said:
some 370s did have
a sort of virtual memory (a little analogous to current LPARs) ... used
for emulators
The implementation of the DOS Emulator Feature on the 3145 involved an
associative
In 01bb01cab42e$08768200$196386...@org, on 02/22/2010
at 06:15 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
Perhaps someone else has a better justification or a better resolution?
Is there some reason to rule out the obvious justification: holding down
the size of the assembly listing? Of course,
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005bde01...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom, on
02/22/2010
at 12:15 PM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
There is a very old, very terrible technique that I used long ago. I
mention it, but do not recommend it. From the currently executing TCB,
find the
In 4b8389b7.9030...@gmail.com, on 02/23/2010
at 03:54 PM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com said:
You're fundamentally not reentrant if you use any kind of global data.
Nonsense. You're reentrant as long as you ensure that concurrent access
doesn't cause incorrect results. The simplest
In listserv%201002221028079631.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 02/22/2010
at 10:28 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Only if you're not authorized.
When did that form of IDENTIFY start requiring APF authorization?
I agree that the overhead might be higher with IDENTIFY.
--
Shmuel
In 053f2631ec9c584883847c8b4970a22806287...@josqems1.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com,
on 02/24/2010
at 11:57 AM, Farley, Peter x23353 peter.far...@broadridge.com said:
OK, I'll bite. What is/was the intended purpose of controlled storage?
Stack.
but at that time I couldn't really see what the
In of7bc60fb2.c3c3be5d-on882576d3.005acd1b-882576d3.005ae...@kp.org, on
02/23/2010
at 08:33 AM, jack.hamil...@kp.org said:
Remember that TICO moon-lander?
TECO?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
We don't
In 4b831351.8030...@neo.tamu.edu, on 02/22/2010
at 05:29 PM, Richard Peurifoy r-peuri...@neo.tamu.edu said:
I suspect he may have meant ORVYL, the interactive exuction companion to
WYLBUR. We never ran it, so I don't know much about it.
Did anyone use it other than Stanford?
--
Shmuel
In 022901cab4a7$a821dc90$f86595...@org, on 02/23/2010
at 08:45 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
FOO DXD F
BAR DC Q(FOO)
does that give me a fullword that will be task-unique at run time?
No. But if in the same load module you do the above and Joe does
MYFOO DXD A
MYBAR DC
In m3fx4s3kja@garlic.com, on 02/22/2010
at 06:42 PM, Anne Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com said:
from the file ...
The phrase WYLBUR/TSO confirms my suspicion that someone was very
confused; the two are very different animals.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
In 00ab01cab3d9$9d328790$d79796...@org, on 02/22/2010
at 08:10 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
IDENTIFY is an interesting idea. I would suspect lower overhead than
name/token. But can you IDENTIFY an address in GETMAIN storage?
Yes.
have to be inside a real load module?
No.
--
In 1266942295.28704.243.ca...@chuck.duda.com, on 02/23/2010
at 11:24 AM, David Andrews d...@lists.duda.com said:
One of you Old Ones (and I'm thinking of Shmuel in particular) correct me
on this, but didn't bare MVT have a horrendous core fragmentation
issue?
VMS[1] had a horrendous core
In 9eaad8039236466f809085d1a7c40...@pinnacledesk1, on 02/24/2010
at 11:21 AM, Pinnacle pinnc...@rochester.rr.com said:
I have a need to zap core,
I might believe a need to zap storage.
I searched
the CBT mods tape and came up empty.
Was the old COREZAP0 program ever updated to run on a
cc'd offlist.
In
of5c873515.4db399b2-on882576d4.005b04cf-882576d4.005b8...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu,
on 02/24/2010
at 08:39 AM, Lucy Arnold lucy.arn...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu said:
we are not running an SMTP started task.
There's a replacement for SMTP[1] on the current release of z/OS.
I was curious
In
5354659.126703019.javamail.r...@mswamui-cedar.atl.sa.earthlink.net,
on 02/24/2010
at 11:49 AM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com said:
I thought the TEST function of TSO could do this as well?
There's an authorized alias; I don't recall whether it's TESTAUTH or
AUTHTEST.
--
In 4b80038c.1050...@gmail.com, on 02/20/2010
at 10:45 AM, Gabriel Tully gjtu...@gmail.com said:
The days of the typical MVS administrator wearing a
lab coat are over.
No. They would have had tohaveto existed at some time in order to be over
now.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg
TESTAUTH. It's protected by a SAF profile.
Mark Jacobs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Wed 2/24/2010 5:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Need tool to zap core
In
snip---
OK, I'll bite. What is/was the intended purpose of controlled storage? I
remember when I first was learning PL/1 (too many moons ago to count)
being fascinated by it, but at that time I couldn't really see what the
We have TIMEZONE W.00.00.00 specified in our CLOCKxx PARMLIB members.
System displays date/time as:
28 JAN 2010 11:10:44 +
We wish this display to be:
28 JAN 2010 11:10:44 PST
Will setting the TIMEZONE parameter as:
TIMEZONE W.08.00.00
Produce the desired result?
May we introduce
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:29:52 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
then BAR and MYVAR will have different contents. In really old PL/I
compilers IBM put the Q-cons in the offset fields of instructions,
limiting the PRV to 4096 bytes.
That's why there's a 12-bit (IIRC) RLD!
-- gil
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:55:22 -0600, Rick Fochtman wrote:
If you've ever done list processing, CONTROLLED storage is the cat's
meow. Beats the Dickens out of trying to maintain arrays and array
counters, especially if there's a chance of exceeding the size of the
arrays. ...
How is CONTROLLED
Matan
why did IBM relased this function only from z/1.10
Make that Why did IBM released this function only from z/OS V1.11?
Presumably you are comparing logging on from a 3270 device to TSO (z/OS)
with logging on from a 3270 device to z/VM and that something that is so
obviously useful in VM
Probably TECO. That was a long time ago.
--
Jack Hamilton
Management Information Analysis
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.
1950 Franklin Street, Oakland, California 94612
+1 510 987-1556 (KP tieline 8-427-1556)
NOTE: This email document and attachments are covered by CA Evidence Code
WYLBUR was used by Stanford and SLAC, and by some other academic
institutions.
There's a commercial version called SuperWylbur,
http://www.superwylbur.com/, I think there was another commercial
version called Interact from Online Business Systems, but Mr. Google is
not being helpful on
From: David Cole dbc...@colesoft.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wed, February 24, 2010 1:41:07 PM
Subject: Re: Need tool to zap core
It's not free, but z/XDC will do the trick. Even more, it can also zap storage
that's been made
read only (such as the PLPA,
Hi List,
We're testing an OS upgrade from 1.7 to 1.10. We are running IDMS and
when the DBA or developers try to run some of their programs in the main
database address space, they are getting language environment errors.
The errors are not showing up in the z/OS log or job output from the
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:44 PM, jack.hamil...@kp.org wrote:
snip
I think there was a version that offloaded some of the work to a 7171
controller.
That's quite enough of THAT kind of talk. Some of us have permanent scars
from those machines. :-)
I had to call my dad to find out what was meant by core.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Pinnacle pinnc...@rochester.rr.comwrote:
I have a need to zap core, but my client does not have OMEGAMON. I
searched the CBT mods tape and came up empty. What we're trying to do is a
SETPROG LPA,ADD,
glen.manages@gmail.com (Glen Gasior) writes:
I had to call my dad to find out what was meant by core.
what is old is new again:
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2010/02/24/2828135.htm
2010 International Conference On Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
http://www.ausnano.net/iconn2010/
--
On 24 Feb 2010 14:53:28 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
In 4b80038c.1050...@gmail.com, on 02/20/2010
at 10:45 AM, Gabriel Tully gjtu...@gmail.com said:
The days of the typical MVS administrator wearing a
lab coat are over.
No. They would have had tohaveto existed at some time in
The next meeting of the NY Metro NaSPA Chapter will be on Tuesday, 2 March
2010 in room 1219 at the IBM Building at 590 Madison Avenue, New York
City, from 10:00 AM until 4:30 PM. We have a full-day of great sessions
planned, including:
An Introduction to LDAP on z/OS, Jon Furminger, LDAP
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:50:02 -0500, George Henke gahe...@gmail.com wrote:
I never considered storage fencing as a possible justification for LPARs,
but maybe that is it?
If so, then even that justification has now been eliminated with
64-bit central storage.
George, you keep looking at the
90 matches
Mail list logo
