If this helps: Abend EE7 is issued by SVC E7=231. This is in the user
SVC range, so I suppose it is your number of an IDMS SVC and the abend
should be documented there.
Kees.
Pommier, Rex R. rex.pomm...@cnasurety.com wrote in message
Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
I guess that'll teach me to never clean up old stuff again. It might just be
causing my production to actually work. :-)
Perhaps on squatty boxes ;-D
A three finger salute always works on those boxes plus the additional feature
of data loss... ;-D
No seriously,
zMan wrote:
In ISMF I can generate a list of datasets, but would very much like to
capture that so I can analyze it. If I do a SAVE SOMENAME, I get an E37
ABEND.
1) What dataset is it trying to write?
To your profile dataset: userid.ISPF.ISPPROF(SOMENAME)
You may need to enlarge that
zMan,
I have a pretty barebones system where almost everything is a default.
When a save an ISMF list with command save hawkins replace the table is
saved in the PDS allocated as ISPTABL, which from a LISTA ST command I
find is my uid.ISPF.ISPPROF. And surprise, surprise a browse of my
Hi to All.
I would like to hear your opinion on the following issue.
We plan to change out 2xZ/10 (704+705) to 2x Z196
We still run a little bit of CICS and normal batch, but our main work is,
that we are running (and Coverting) our present applications to a
multitier-System.
That is, the
Steve,
You could implement SSDP in your agents. I'm no expert on it but it's worth
a look:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Service_Discovery_Protocol
The problem may reduce to identifying instances of your agent.
Cheers,
Andrew
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:06:00 +0100, Steve Austin
1. Better to have 2 z/Series, just in case one should go down entirely.
2. Are they in separate computer rooms in separate cities at least 2
POPs away, for mirroring and protection against a Hinsdale fire
taking out a phone company hub.
Not really. I think we had to fiddle a bit to make DB2 DCLGENs work - some
had to be massaged a bit for EMU to accept them. But nothing serious
Andy R
-IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote: -
rom: Ron Wells rwe...@agfinance.com
was there any show stoppers??
Rather than focus on your problems using SAVE etc., like others, I thought I
might point you in a different direction.
You could use DCOLLECT to get a list of all your data sets. DCOLLECT records
includes all kinds of info that can be collected, and that data can be
processed/reported/analyzed.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.cawrote:
On 22 Sep 2010 12:55:17 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
(OOPS - I forgot and replied in the Newsgroup rather than sending to the
list-server. Sorry for the duplicate - for those who see two copies of
The way ISMF PRINT works is rather cockeyed.
Once you have created your list of data sets in ISMF, go to LIST at the top of
the screen and select the PRINT option from the drop down menu.
The resulting panel will ask for a list of TAGS. These are the numbers
associated with each column entry.
Where is this documented?
Thanks
Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Norman Hollander on DesertWiz
Sent: 22 September 2010 19:10
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Identify all MVS images in a CEC
There is a
Steve
The service DIAG 204 is not really documented in the z/OS world - it might be
documented in the VM world (not sure).
However, its usage and the best guess at the parmlist and restrictions are in
the public domain (for an example see the source for SHOWMVS/ZOS on the CBT
tape). Obviously
Another DCOLLECT (not ISMF) option would be to use DFSORT and/or ICETOOL to
pick through DCOLLECT data and build reports. There's a nice set of starter
samples on the DFSORT publications page.
Start with http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort
Select the Publications link
Under Papers and Examples,
Mike Schwab observes:
Actually, their product runs on the mainframe, and translates
TN3270E data setreams to HTML Web pages. So any built in web
browser accesses a remote mainframe with this product installed
on the mainframe.
Many products do, including a popular product produced by my
Can anyone suggest a methodology to measure GB per hour written to tape?
Management is seeking to evaluate the additional CPU overhead that s/w
encryption might entail.
IBM's Volume mount analyzer gives tape allocation and tape mounts per hour but
not, to my knowledge, GB written per hour.
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 22:51 -0400, Mike Schwab wrote:
http://www.hercules-390.org/hercfaq.html
In Section 3.01, Paragraph 4 of 6:
[...] The prize for the world's smallest mainframe probably goes to
Ivan Warren, who claims to have run VM/370 under Hercules on an iPAQ
5450 handheld PDA.
Time
John,
This was briefly discussed here earlier in March 2010 also. Look for the
thread entitled 'CA Easytrieve replacement'
Dana
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Dave,
It's rough, but if you have RMM as your tape management system, it records how
much data is written to the tape - precompression. You could just divide the
amount on the tape with how long the job took to get GB per hour. I don't know
if the other TMS' have this field or not.
Rex
I typically think of a migration utility as a one-time thing. And you can
use IBM Migration Utility in that fashion, if you wish: convert the
programs to COBOL then maintain those, in COBOL, with the MU library. But
that's not the only option. You can also continue writing/maintaining in
the
O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] pisze:
Can anyone suggest a methodology to measure GB per hour written to tape?
Management is seeking to evaluate the additional CPU overhead that s/w
encryption might entail.
IBM's Volume mount analyzer gives tape allocation and tape mounts per hour but
not,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 8:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Easytrieve to COBOL - IBM Migration Utility of
z/OS - program 5697-N44
I typically
timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com (Timothy Sipples) writes:
In terms of CPU burden, sure, there's CPU burden incurred *somewhere*, and
CPU burden is never free anywhere. My employer -- the one that I do not
speak for -- has neatly solved that financial problem at least in this
particular mainframe
Hi Rex,
Thanks for responding. No, we have TMS (CA-1) as our tape management system.
Guess I had a senior moment earlier. The number of bytes written or read would
obviously only be available at the end of the job. GB/hour is just not
available for any job running past :59 of any hour.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of O'Brien, David W.
(NIH/CIT) [C]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 9:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Reports for GB per hour to tape
Hi Rex,
Thanks for responding.
Hi John,
Yes, I had thought of extrapolating channel busy % but I'm not sure that
would be precise enough.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Thank You,
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: McKown, John [john.mck...@healthmarkets.com]
Sent: Thursday, September
David,
Why would you extrapolate % channel busy? The MB/sec written, and read, for
each channel is on the report.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010
John,
Your mentioning this product piqued my interest in it as well. Unfortunately
from my brief perusal of the documentation, it appears as though it doesn't
handle IDMS.
Bummer,
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT obrie...@mail.nih.gov wrote in
message
news:cd22aa1aee707d489d9250d13e3862a18591355...@nihmlbxcms02.nih.gov..
.
Can anyone suggest a methodology to measure GB per hour written to
tape?
Management is seeking to evaluate the additional CPU overhead that s/w
Thanks Stephen, I appreciate the reality check. I fought my way through
it far enough yesterday to realize that SMTP has a documented
restriction for the dataset of an LRECL of 243 or less (although it will
take up to 250). I used an old friend IEBGENER to truncate the file
from FBA 256 to FB
I would not consider doing Capacity Planning by adding up MIPs or MSUs.
You probably have 2 CECs to avoid single point of failure (although on the
z196 it is a very small chance that the entire box would fail), or you went
through some kind of merger/acquisition, or you have a primary/secondary
Cross post from IBMTCP-L
Finally working on converting gateway to beginroutes format. I took some advice
to from the archives and used the 'netstat routes report' command to create the
basis of my conversion. Below is a short segment of the routes report, not
sure how to handle the statements
Thanks Ron, I see what you're referring to.
Thank You,
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: Ron Hawkins [ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Reports for GB per hour to tape
David,
Based on some recent threads on various listservs,
there apears to be a lot of misinformation about
how to write programs that call other programs
written in different programming languages.
Based on these threads, I've revised our course
Secrets of Inter-Language Communication in z/OS
and
Hi,
I have a question about using fork() in a C program. In SDSF, command PS, I
can see the new child process, and there I see it has the same jobname as
the process that did the fork(), but it has a different JobID.
So, since it is apparently a different job than the job that did the fork(),
Matt
I hope the following two references pull it together for you:
---
z/OS Communications Server, IP System Administrator's Commands, Version 1
Release 12, SC31-8781-10
-
3.1.6.20 Netstat ROUTe/-r report
...
Report field descriptions
...
Gateway or Gw
The gateway used to send packets
Just a small nit. ** in option 3.4 produces a list of only the cataloged
datasets. That should be adequate unless users have uncataloged datasets, in
which case the OP will need to go volume by volume..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:55:08 -0500, Etienne Thijsse wrote:
Does anybody know why I don't see the second job in SDSF/ST ? Or,
I wondered that once, and was fed some alphabet soup; perhaps
JOE vs. ???.
alternatively, does anyone know how I can have the child process put its
output within the
Does your root ZFS exist on your SYSRES or does it get moved after
receiving it from IBM? Do you rename it to reflect the OS level or
version?
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB
I use a mod-27 for my sysres, so yes, my Serverpac supplied filesystems
are on the sysres, and they have the SYSRES VOLSER in the dataset name.
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of John Norgauer
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 12:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: where does your OMVS Root file live?
Does your root ZFS exist on your SYSRES or does it
Our VERSION root is on the SYSRES and contains the SYSRES name, which we change
whenever we install maintenance,...SYS1.VSver1.OMVS.ROOT ,
SYS1.VSver2.OMVS.ROOT, etc.
Our SYSPLEX root is in the SMS System pool.
Jon L. Veilleux
veilleu...@aetna.com
(860) 636-9179
-Original
In addition to the overhead of software encryption, consider the effects
of the loss of hardware compression for the data written to tape, which
will affect both tape performance and thus elapsed time and the amount
of tape used. Both effects might pose challenges for jobs that need to
finish
Chris, mind if we take this offline. I can then send the table as an
attachment, might be easier to read.
Tks Matt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Chris Mason
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 11:59 AM
To:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:11:33 -0700, John Norgauer
john.norga...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu wrote:
Does your root ZFS exist on your SYSRES or does it get moved after
receiving it from IBM? Do you rename it to reflect the OS level or
version?
Same as most of the other responses. SYSRES (set) with the
Not using zFS for Root.
Using zFS for user and product file systems.
Root file systems for my 3 LPARs all z/OS 1.10
For KMC1 LPAR - HFS.ZOS0110.KMC1.ROOT renamed and directed during
ServerPac install to Master Catalog/IODF/SMPE volume.
For CPAC LPAR - HFS.ZOS0110.CPAC.ROOT on SYSRES volume
Here it lives in the appropriate SMS pool with the z/OS version, the LPAR and
the PUT level in the name.
David Elliot
zSeries Software Support
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
John Norgauer
Sent: Thursday, September 23,
If you are running in STAR mode, see APAR OA33898.
~Chris Brooker
GRS L3 Team Lead
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
My zFS files are SYS1.OMVS.sysres.ROOT, and reside in an SMS pool.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:24 PM, David Elliot elli...@aafes.com wrote:
Here it lives in the appropriate SMS pool with the z/OS version, the LPAR
and the PUT level in the name.
David Elliot
zSeries Software Support
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:11:33 -0700, John Norgauer
john.norga...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu wrote:
Does your root ZFS exist on your SYSRES or does it get moved after
receiving it from IBM? Do you rename it to reflect the OS level or
version?
I copy all SMP/E maintained using ADRDSSU to datasets
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:10:39 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:55:08 -0500, Etienne Thijsse wrote:
Does anybody know why I don't see the second job in SDSF/ST ? Or,
I wondered that once, and was fed some alphabet soup; perhaps
JOE vs. ???.
Thank you, at
I've got an exit that installs on SYS.IEFU83, 4 and 5. On my test system and
several customer systems it works as expected. However, on one customer
(z/OS V1R7 FWIW, although I have tested on V1R7 successfully) I am seeing
*some* of the expected records but not all. The exit is installed first on
Did you install the exits in SYSTSO?
SYSTSO.IEFU83
SYSTSO.IEFU84
SYSTSO.IEFU85
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:59, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
I've got an exit that installs on SYS.IEFU83, 4 and 5. On my test system
and
several customer systems it works as expected. However, on one
Did you install the exits in SYSTSO?
No, have not needed to on the other systems. Would you expect that I would
have to sometimes? Under what circumstances?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Brian Kennelly
Sent:
On 9/23/2010 10:10 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:55:08 -0500, Etienne Thijsse wrote:
Does anybody know why I don't see the second job in SDSF/ST ? Or,
I wondered that once, and was fed some alphabet soup; perhaps
JOE vs. ???.
alternatively, does anyone know how I can have
Perhaps I need an explicit SUBSYS(TSO,TYPE(30,80))?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 11:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: SMF Exit suppression question
I've
No, that alone will not fix the problem. TSO exits are already getting type
30 and 80.
You need to add your exit to the dynamic exit list for each subsystem you
want to monitor.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 14:32, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Perhaps I need an explicit
Each defined subsystem has its own set of dynamic exits. If you have not
defined a separate TSO subsystem, the SYS defaults will be used, but the SYS
** exits are called for subsystem if it is defined in the SMF
parms.
Similarly, if JES2 is defined in SMF, you will need to install your
OK, a third question: Is this even worthwhile?
In batch, perhaps?
z/OS v1.11 DFSMSdfp Storage Administration SC26-7402-13 Chapter 21 Using
NaviQuest, Performing Storage Administration tasks in Batch pg 356.
Generate a Data Set List: ACBQBAI2 pg 365.
Table 29 SYS1.SACBCNTL Sample JCL
Thanks much. Please allow me to clarify. (Not arguing -- just wanting to
make sure I understand perfectly.) You are saying that on the not working
system I need to install in SYSTSO.IEFU8x because of the statements
SUBSYS(TSO,...
that appear in the not working system's PARMLIB.
But on the
That is an accurate recap. (I ran into this one myself.)
To see the exits on the system, you can use
*D PROG,EXIT*
or
*D PROG,EXIT,MODNAME=IEFU84*
to see the exits for IEFU84, e.g..
*
*
You should see the exit names for each subsystem listed.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 15:01, Charles Mills
Awesome! Thanks so much. You have no idea how much agony I have invested in
this. I will post back here within a couple of days if this solves the
problem.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Brian Kennelly
Sent:
Matt
Go ahead. I/you/we can try to put any useful conclusions online for the
archives.
Chris Mason - chrisma...@belgacom.net
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:58:48 -0400, Dazzo, Matt mda...@pch.com
wrote:
Chris, mind if we take this offline. I can then send the table as an
attachment, might be easier
On 23 Sep 2010 07:29:51 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Hi John,
Yes, I had thought of extrapolating channel busy % but I'm not sure that
would be precise enough.
Thanks for the suggestion.
As I recall the SMF 14 (sequential read) and 15 (sequential write)
records have the device
Here is the relevant documentation from the *Installation and Tuning
Reference*:
The SUBSYS specification overrides the SYS specification. Use SUBSYS to make
exceptions to your SYS specification for particular subsystems.
...
When you associate new exit routines with SMF exits through PROGxx
Clark,
The EXCP*BLKSIZE=MB is not true for all access methods. I'd only assume this
is correct for SAM-E, which is probably the majority of tape IO.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
Clark Morris
Sent: Thursday,
The EXCP*BLKSIZE=MB is not true for all access methods. I'd only assume this
is correct for SAM-E, which is probably the majority of tape IO.
Ron, we've had this argument/discussion before.
With XA/ESA, or even slightly before, IOC was changed to allow either blocks or
8.3 ms of connect time.
I am out of the office until 09/27/2010.
I am out of the office. Call my cell if this is an emergency.
Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: SMF Exit
suppression question sent on 9/23/10 15:28:54.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
I do an DCOLLECT on the volumes then an easytrieve report by storage
groups and similarly name non-sms volumes.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Neil Duffee nduf...@uottawa.ca wrote:
OK, a third question: Is this even worthwhile?
In batch, perhaps?
z/OS v1.11 DFSMSdfp Storage Administration
Ted,
You want to use connect time to figure out MB/sec on FICON? Be my guest. I
would rather beat my head a against a steel spike :-)
The busier any component in the path gets, the more inaccurate it becomes.
Path includes the MP on the host and the storage, ISL if you have any
cascading,
70 matches
Mail list logo
