Hi Mike,
Exit 52 (and the corresponding exit 2) are for modifications to the JOB
statement, not the JCL, so that's not the place to add your two cards (unless
they are to be added to the JOB card). The proper place to change JCL and add
cards within the JCL stream itself (under JES) is in exit
I will be out of the office starting 10/01/2011 and will not return until
10/10/2011.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Searc
Sir/s,
Ray ... I'd added some code that had functioned (though it did not
run as one) like an 'SIRB' ... (for identifying storage users) at
one point. I forget now if it was in phase 2, VDCC or some other
module.
That said, essentially, I see little (if any) need for most all to
ever need SIRB
> >
> > The restored OMVS datasets are from other LPAR. Here , Is it possible
> > to
> know what
> > were all the Mount points defined for the Restored OMVS dataset ?
> > Is it something I can browse these HFS files and know there mount
> > Points
> ?(When we
> > are unsure about the paths mounted)
>
> The restored OMVS datasets are from other LPAR. Here , Is it possible to
know what
> were all the Mount points defined for the Restored OMVS dataset ?
> Is it something I can browse these HFS files and know there mount Points
?(When we
> are unsure about the paths mounted)
>
Jags.
Probably
Jags:
All the system mount points are in sys1.parmlib(bpxprmxx) , if you had
additional ones you have to added in there.
a 'D OMVS,F' should show you the files. Another place, is ISHELL in Option #6
of TSO..
Look at the pull down menu 'File_systems' under that menu you will see
1. Mount Table
I will be out of the office starting 09/30/2011 and will not return until
10/10/2011.
If you are having a production problem, please contact the CAC at extention
4000 or via e-mail: c...@fruit.com.
If you need assistance prior to my return, please contact Jeff Gibson at
ext. 2738 or via email:
Sir,
I've been shot for this before so I'll be brief
In a manner of speaking, TCBNOIRB vs TCBFX is more about asynchronous vs.
synchronous.
That said, 'an' aspect is the restriction of IRB's but NOT SRB's, a 2nd
would be the
'specific' user. I know SMS is one of them and the other, for qui
Hi,
The restored OMVS datasets are from other LPAR. Here , Is it possible to
know what were all the Mount points defined for the Restored OMVS dataset ?
Is it something I can browse these HFS files and know there mount Points
?(When we are unsure about the paths mounted)
Regards,
Jags
On Fri, Se
Stephen Powell wrote:
>Yes, I remember that. But there was a full-screen 3270 editor similar to
>XEDIT available with VM/370 release 6 called EDGAR. I think it was
>an add-on product. I don't think it was part of VM/370.
Yes, Edgar was an add-on product. It was somewhat similar to XEDIT in a lo
By way of preface, you may have seen an article in the Wall Street Journal
last month about Paul Allen's collection of vintage mainframe and minicomputer
systems, devoted in particular to my colleague's travels in Australia to
look for a 7094 (which turned out to be a 7090) and a System/360. We ha
I would like to thank you all. I fixed the problem with the PL/1-F
compiler on VM/370 R6
on Hercules, it works now. Also the Stanford Pascal Compiler, which
generates PCODE370
as intermediate code, then 370 code. And ASSEMBLER and FORTRAN, of course.
There are some other languages, which I have
Each LCU has 256 that can be GEN'ed the PAV's are GEN'ed has 3390A for aliases
Example
CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=BF11,PATH=(F1,F2,F6,F7,6F,8C), *
UNITADD=((00,256)),CUADD=1,UNIT=2105
IODEVICE ADDRESS=(40D0,048),CUNUMBR=(BF10),STADET=Y,UNIT=3390A
IODEVICE ADDRESS=(410
Got some names mixed up. The secondary JES name can have any 4th
character. I used 'S' here for consistency.
Here are some definitions for secondary JES2 that accesses an inactive
spool, that is, one whose own MVS/JES2 were not active at the time.
-- Name must be som
>2.) This architecture exploits Parallel Access Volume (PAV) functionality; we
>have 48 PAV's defined to each Logical Control Unit (LCU) of which we have
>16 LCU's; on our Payroll processing weekend
Out of how many volumes? 256?
>I have I see 46 of the 48 PAV's defined to one (1) logical a
Here are some definitions for secondary JES2 that accesses an inactive
spool, that is, one whose own MVS/JES2 were not active at the time.
-- Name must be something other than JES2, e.g. JESS
-- JESS must be defined in the subsystem name table
SUBSYS SUBNAME(JESS) /* ALTERNATE JES -- NO O
Several years ago (pre KATRINA) we migrated from eleven (11) DASD subsystems
from five (5) different vendors (Hitachi Solid State Device with 2.43GBS and
two (2) HDS 7000; EMC 5000 and EMC5430; two IBM/STK RAMAC VIRTUAL ARRAYS
(RVA); two (2) Amdahl Subsystems which were RAID1 and two STK ICEBER
> As far as I know, TCBFX and TCBNOIRB both serve the same function:
> When either is on, the queuing of IRBs to the task is deferred. Both
> of the APARs you suggested, discuss problems when such deferrals are
> not managed properly.
>
> What I want to know is, why the redundancy? Why are ther
You are correct. I want to set up a secondary Jes2 that is not part of
the same mas as the primary. I need to test some jes2 exits that I;m
writing. I don't want to test the exits on the primary jes for obvious
reasons. I figured I could connect the two using some type of nje
configuration, but I'n
Can you tell us what you want to do? I assume that by 'not part of a MAS',
you mean not part of the same MAS as the primary JES2. Once upon a time,
you could point a secondary JES2 to any spool you wanted. Now there are
sysplex considerations.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology
Hi all, does anyone know of a good document for setting up a secondary
JES2 that's not part of a MAS.
Thanks in advance.
==
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity
to which they are address
Thanks for the link, Jim. I'll take a look.
Dave
At 9/30/2011 04:41 PM, Jim Thomas wrote:
Sir,
Try this ... I think (like Ray) that I have the same manual ...
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/360/os/R21.7_Apr73/plm/GY28-6616-9_OS_IO_Su
perv_PLM_R21.7_Apr73.pdf
and yes ... it is old ... but f
That puts it at z/OS R1.5
At 9/30/2011 04:36 PM, Jim Mulder wrote:
> Wow, it actually dated back 1981, 1983. I do not even realize TCBNOIRB
> didn't exist then. Do you know what z/OS version it was introduced?
"Use the source, Luke".
I don't always think to look in MACLIB...
Would that I
All right, I stand educated. ;-)
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
From: Mark Zelden
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 09/30/2011 01:35 PM
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:37:10 -0400, David Cole wrote:
At 9/30/2011 04:12 PM, Jim Thomas wrote:
The focus is not on IRB's but mainly, the ability to use SRB's ..
(this is where I tried to point out IRB vs SRB .. IOW ... with
TCBNOIRB ... you can still ... IIRC, use SRB's).
"SRBs"? or "SIRBs"?
Sir,
Try this ... I think (like Ray) that I have the same manual ...
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/360/os/R21.7_Apr73/plm/GY28-6616-9_OS_IO_Su
perv_PLM_R21.7_Apr73.pdf
and yes ... it is old ... but for the most part, still very much valid (that
I know of).
Kind Regards
Jim Thomas
617-233-
> Wow, it actually dated back 1981, 1983. I do not even realize TCBNOIRB
> didn't exist then. Do you know what z/OS version it was introduced?
"Use the source, Luke".
BROWSESYS1.MACLIB(IKJTCB)Li
Command ===>
.* $08=OW47908 HBB6605 010129 U2IAXZ: Add TCBNOIRB
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:41:25 -0700, Skip Robinson
wrote:
>OK, I stand corrected on the 'separateness' issue. I remember now trying
>REIPL without having AUTOIPL set up. It didn't work at all.
>
>However there is obviously a difference. A vanilla VARY XCF OFF does not
>invoke automatic IPL becaus
At 9/30/2011 04:12 PM, Jim Thomas wrote:
The focus is not on IRB's but mainly, the ability to use SRB's ..
(this is where I tried to point out IRB vs SRB .. IOW ... with
TCBNOIRB ... you can still ... IIRC, use SRB's).
"SRBs"? or "SIRBs"?
I would be surprised if a TCB setting such as TCBFX wo
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:22:49 -0400, David Cole wrote:
Interesting...
How old is your "Stage 3 exit Effector Logic" manual? (I'm guessing
at least a couple of decades.) I *think* that the TCBNOIRB flag might
be newer than your manual.
I don't know when it was introduced, but I became aware of TC
On 9/30/2011 1:04 PM, Jim Mulder wrote:
17C
Operator requested partitioning with the VARY XCF command and REIPL
AutoIPL option specified.
180
Operator requested partitioning with the VARY XCF command and SADMP
AutoIPL option specified.
184
Operator requested partitioning with the VARY XCF comm
Interesting...
How old is your "Stage 3 exit Effector Logic" manual? (I'm guessing
at least a couple of decades.) I *think* that the TCBNOIRB flag might
be newer than your manual.
I don't know when it was introduced, but I became aware of TCBNOIRB
only within the past year. The TCBFX flag I'
List / Et'al ...
Forgive me for this OT email ... but I'd really love to
chat w/Ray I'm pretty sure we know each other ...
Ray ... if you please, contact me directly .. email or
otherwise ...
Hope all is well w/you ... and I look forward to hearing
from you !!.
Kind Regards
Jim Th
Ok, that's a policy difference and is good to know. Thanks.
I'd still like to know what the functional difference is (if any).
Thanks,
Dave Cole REPLY TO: dbc...@colesoft.com
ColeSoft Marketing WEB PAGE: http://www.colesoft.com
736 Fox Hollow RoadVOICE:540-456-8536
Afto
Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
riv...@dignus.com (Thomas David Rivers) writes:
Can anyone point me to a description of the CMS non-relocatable
load module format? I can't seem to find it anywhere...
(i.e. the output of the CMS GENMOD command.)
old/original ... part of vm370/cms release 6
Sir,
The focus is not on IRB's but mainly, the ability to use
SRB's .. (this is where I tried to point out IRB vs SRB ..
IOW ... with TCBNOIRB ... you can still ... IIRC, use SRB's).
If you'd like to go into detail .. perhaps explain what you're
trying to do and such ... please feel free to conta
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:00:43 -0400, David Cole wrote:
Can anyone tell me the difference in purpose or management between
the TCBFX flag and the TCBNOIRB flag?
As far as I know they both are supposed to prevent the queuing of
IRBs. In the IKJTCB macro they each are doc'd as follows:
TCBNOIRB
> On 9/30/2011 12:41 PM, Skip Robinson wrote:
> > However there is obviously a difference. A vanilla VARY XCF OFF does
not
> > invoke automatic IPL because AUTOIPL is not triggered by WAIT 0A2.
'REIPL'
> > must override that exception.
>
> 0A2 with reason=4 is in the WSAT:
>
>
> 6.4.1 Wait st
On 9/30/2011 12:54 PM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Oops. It's the x17C reason that performs the reIPL:
X'40A2'
X'1017C0A2' <--- Right Here!
X'201800A2'
X'301840A2'
X'200010B5'
X'200020B5'
X'A001'
X'A007'
X'A008'
X'A009'
X'A010'
X'A037'
On 9/30/2011 12:41 PM, Skip Robinson wrote:
However there is obviously a difference. A vanilla VARY XCF OFF does not
invoke automatic IPL because AUTOIPL is not triggered by WAIT 0A2. 'REIPL'
must override that exception.
0A2 with reason=4 is in the WSAT:
6.4.1 Wait state action table (WSAT)
OK, I stand corrected on the 'separateness' issue. I remember now trying
REIPL without having AUTOIPL set up. It didn't work at all.
However there is obviously a difference. A vanilla VARY XCF OFF does not
invoke automatic IPL because AUTOIPL is not triggered by WAIT 0A2. 'REIPL'
must override
Farley, Peter wrote, in part:
>There is no version of XEDIT available in any form (or wasn't the last time
I checked, anyway). XEDIT only came with VM/SP2 and up, I believe.
VM/SP Release 1. Not that it matters, but the gods of historical correctness
must be appeased!
...phsiii
Rick,
I agree with you 100%. Calculators are great, but sometimes, kids take the easy
way out which is a calculator over doing it by hand
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: Rick Fochtman
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Friday, Se
Thats like the slide-rule days before calculators...
---
Don't knock that old "slip-stick". :-) For me it's faster than a calculator!
I sometimes tutor high-sch
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:29:22 -0700, Skip Robinson
wrote:
>
>Also to clarify: there is a REIPL option on the VARY XCF OFF command. This
>is very useful when you just want to bounce a system for whatever reason.
>No delay, no switching sysres volume. This option is totally separate from
>AUTOIPL,
On 9/30/2011 11:29 AM, Skip Robinson wrote:
Also to clarify: there is a REIPL option on the VARY XCF OFF command. This
is very useful when you just want to bounce a system for whatever reason.
No delay, no switching sysres volume. This option is totally separate from
AUTOIPL, which is intended to
> Also to clarify: there is a REIPL option on the VARY XCF OFF command.
This
> is very useful when you just want to bounce a system for whatever
reason.
> No delay, no switching sysres volume. This option is totally separate
from
> AUTOIPL, which is intended to repair a sick system while gett
David,
I believe that TCBNOIRB is within TCBFLGS8 which is part of the programming
interface whereas TCBFX is within TCBFLGS1 which is not.
Tom
- Original Message -
From: David Cole [mailto:dbc...@colesoft.com]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 02:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
THANKS Dana!
Have a nice WE.
Jan
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Dana Mitchell wrote:
> Jan,
>
> We migrated from two Hitachi subsystems to two DS8100's. Performance was a
> very noticable improvement mostly due to going from Escon to Ficon.
> Migration was easy since the deal included a tem
Hi Jim,
Thanks for taking a stab at this. I've looked at the APARs you
suggested, but if the offer clues to my question, I'm not seeing them...
As far as I know, TCBFX and TCBNOIRB both serve the same function:
When either is on, the queuing of IRBs to the task is deferred. Both
of the APARs
I'm not sure why Barbara is so opposed to AUTOIPL in principle, but I can
see where critical production might be problematic. On the other hand,
I've seldom seen a system truly hang (from XCF's point of view) for an
extended period and then miraculously recover. The 'extended period' is
user-de
Jan,
We migrated from two Hitachi subsystems to two DS8100's. Performance was a
very noticable improvement mostly due to going from Escon to Ficon. Migration
was easy since the deal included a tempory license for IBM's TDMF. Moved 5
images in a sysplex and removed all the old DASD without a
Sir,
I do not have the data areas w/me at the moment, but I believe
this to be an issue of 'whom' FLIH has trapped (e.g. ... TASK, SRB,
SVC .) and since you've said, 'task' being interrupted, a peek
at the SVRB (in specific) might give you better insight.
Kind Regards
Jim Thomas
617-233-4
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:41:13 -0700, Edward Jaffe
wrote:
>On 9/30/2011 10:17 AM, Mark Zelden wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:11:07 -0500, Barbara Nitz wrote:
>>
>>> Let's see if the rest of the autoipl function is as bad.
>> Use it, love it. Long time coming... VM has had a reipl option "fo
On 9/30/2011 12:54 PM, Jan Vanbrabant wrote:
Hi,
Mgt is discussing replacement of EMC with DS8000 of a customer who is
insourced.
Besides the financial aspect (which fortunately is not my problem) there is
of course the technical aspect.
Any "succes" stories? "Horror" stories"?
- about migra
Sir,
For TCBNOIRB, I'd suggest scanning thru an old APAR (OA19796) and perhaps
following
on to some of the other related APAR's (please keep in mind, 'IRB').
For TCBFX, I'd suggest, OA16342 and related (please keep in mind,
'asynchronous').
>From the little I've used these flags, it's more a q
On 9/30/2011 10:17 AM, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:11:07 -0500, Barbara Nitz wrote:
Let's see if the rest of the autoipl function is as bad.
Use it, love it. Long time coming... VM has had a reipl option "forever".
Just to clarify: although the results appear similar, what
Jags,
If you go into TSO Option #6 and look at the Mount Table which is on the
Pulldown menu at the top of the screen do you see the HFS file,
if not it isnt mounted, you will have to mount it That also can be
performed in the same pulldown menu
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.id
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:11:07 -0500, Barbara Nitz wrote:
>Let's see if the rest of the autoipl function is as bad.
Use it, love it. Long time coming... VM has had a reipl option "forever".
At first I tested without the SADMP option, but since the codes in the WSAT
that say to take an SADMP a
Rick,
I forgot to mention my last go around (recently) with manuals. I got an IPAD
last year and while it did come with instructions, the instructions were
printed on a folded piece of paper that were printed in 4pt type. Now I will
admit to being old but 4 pt type?. So how can anyone inst
Hi,
Mgt is discussing replacement of EMC with DS8000 of a customer who is
insourced.
Besides the financial aspect (which fortunately is not my problem) there is
of course the technical aspect.
Any "succes" stories? "Horror" stories"?
- about migration
- about performance ( I/Os,response ti
Don,
Thats like the slide-rule days before calculators...
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: "Grinsell, Don"
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: OT to my collegues
"I had to carry th
Take a look at mounting it then /usr/sbin/mount -qv /your/path.
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
jagadishan perumal
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 8:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: OMVS restore
Hopefully you unmounted the filesystem before restoring, but did not mention
remounting. What error do you see when you try mounting?
Regarding the IPL has BPXPRMxx recently been changed? You can try SETOMVS
SYNTAXCHECK=(xx) for possible errors.
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
Fro
Hi Lizette,
Source LPAR : 1.6
Target LPAR : 1.12
During IPL there are not failure messages pertaining to OMVS. I even check
in tso ishell to see if there are paths related to the restored OMVS
datasets but no luck. Onething we noticed was these were just a OMVS
datasets which were not updated in
"I had to carry them on CD, ugh.."
Now that makes me smile. I can only wonder what my kids will be telling their
kids about how tough they had it back in the days of iPods and all that jazz.
--
Donald Grinsell
State of Montana
406-444-2983
dgrins...@mt.gov
"Up until age seventy, to some degr
>
>I did a OMVS restore for three HFS files and restore was Successful on the
>target lpar. When I do /D OMVS,F , I cannot see the files mounted. After the
>restore , I even IPLed the system to see the changes but still no luck.
>Could anyone please suggest if I have missed something. The restored
peter.far...@broadridge.com (Farley, Peter x23353) writes:
> IIRC there is no easy FTP in or out of VM/370. Your only real
> transfer capability is the VM/370 system reader and punch. The VMARC
> format (like XMIT) packages text in 80-byte records and can be
> transmitted back and forth using rea
Sorry for the wrong posting. Please ignore my previous email.
Regards
Saurabh
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:32 PM, saurabh khandelwal <
sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> boss.. what was the solution for my problem..
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:29 PM, jagadishan perumal > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
boss.. what was the solution for my problem..
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:29 PM, jagadishan perumal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did a OMVS restore for three HFS files and restore was Successful on the
> target lpar. When I do /D OMVS,F , I cannot see the files mounted. After
> the
> restore , I even IPLed t
Hi,
I did a OMVS restore for three HFS files and restore was Successful on the
target lpar. When I do /D OMVS,F , I cannot see the files mounted. After the
restore , I even IPLed the system to see the changes but still no luck.
Could anyone please suggest if I have missed something. The restored O
Hello all, I have been tasked to dynamically add 2 cards to specific
jobs, and also modify the sysout card for those same jobs. I have been
reading and rereading the jes2 exit manual and now I'm thoroughly
confused as to how to actually do it. The sample exits they provide
don't actually show you h
Clark,
I guess I am a little bias, second generation IT, also my second software
vendor, this time as a Developer.
I would agree the manuals should be transportable, i.e; ipad, iphone, etc.
Makes life a lot easier.
I had to carry them on CD, ugh..
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.ide
On 29 Sep 2011 13:57:23 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>Yep Ed absolutely ...Read the manuals of the product and go through and
>critical think, did i say a bad word, critical think
On the other hand, it could be like the manuals for my Canon SX20
where the nice pocket size getting s
On 29 Sep 2011 18:08:36 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>-
>
>>Why read when it is simpler to just ask here and get a pre-digested answer?
>>Almost as good as sleep learning via RNA-drip. Or is my attitude show
Yes. I've run into that myself. It's as if UNIX were evil. Well, OK, maybe it
is. . But not as evil as Windows. And, in reality, I like using Linux for
my desktop. z/OS UNIX is not as nice, IMO.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Bouleva
As far as I know you are correct. I have not tried to do that.
However, my company has found that lots of sites know how to transfer MVS files
(even if they are using FTP :-)), but balk at transferring UNIX files from
z/OS. So giving them the commands to build an MVS file from a set of UNIX
f
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Scott Ford
>
> Yep Ed absolutely ...Read the manuals of the product and go through
and critical think, did i say a
> bad word, critical think[.]
More and more nowadays, it seems people are not being taught *how* to
th
OK, I was thinking the OP wanted the contents of a z/OS dataset to be put into
a tar file (likely along with its z/OS DSN and DCB characteristics). You're
very correct about the pax/tar output data residing in a z/OS dataset. My
mistake.
pax -wzf "//'SOME.ZOS.DSN.PAX.Z'"
will do it. But I mai
Actually pax will support input or output MVS files: you can pax from an MVS
flat file to the appropriate UNIX files or pax into an MVS flat file from UNIX
files. But notice that the files being manipulated by pax are always UNIX
files.
I am not sure about tar do this. I have only done it wi
Bernd,
There is a pretty active Yahoo group for help with Hercules problems to which
you should direct your questions:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-390/
And there is one for VM/370 too:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Hercules-VM370/
However, I can answer one or two of your questions:
Bottom line: no.
tar (and pax) only support UNIX resident files. They do not support z/OS type
datasets (PS, PO, VS, etc). You could copy the data into a UNIX file
/u/myid/zos.full.dataset.name and then tar that. But you'd need a way to
reconstruct it on the far end. Hum, you could use TSO TRAN
>F HCHECKER,REFRESH,CHECK=(IBMSVA,SVA_AUTOIPL_DEFINED)
>CSV430I MODULE U11DHCXT FOR EXIT HZSADDCHECK HAS BEEN MADE INACTIVE
>DUE TO ABEND=29 REASON=02014007
>SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=290 REASON CODE=02014007
>
> PSW AT TIME OF ERROR 070C1001 9516A252 ILC 2 INTC 0D
> ACTIVE LOAD MODULE
Here's an interesting question... Given that when a task is interrupted:
(1) It's registers (Rn, RHn and ARn) are saved in the TCB and STCB
(2) When the interrupt (such as SVCs or program checks or certain
asynchronous ones) leads to the creation of a new RB, those saved
registers are eventual
Can anyone tell me the difference in purpose or management between
the TCBFX flag and the TCBNOIRB flag?
As far as I know they both are supposed to prevent the queuing of
IRBs. In the IKJTCB macro they each are doc'd as follows:
TCBNOIRB EQU X'40' - If on, IRBs will not be queued to th
Hi to all.
There's a way using bpxbatch to create a tar.gz of dataset and to convert in
the compress the dsname into filename?
Regards.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bam
Scott Ford wrote:
>Is that I am getting older or are people forgetting how to read IBM manuals
>.
Shhh, you will damage the few working brain cells we old bald greybeards
have.
Anyway, one good thing about getting old - you have fewer braincells to worry
about... :-D
Ok, What a
Hello all,
following this discussion yesterday, I tried to play a little bit with
Hercules for the first time.
I followed one of the links below and succeeded so far with installing
Hercules and a
VM/370 R6 installation which does IPL, and I have some X3270 sessions to
connect to VM.
I did V
88 matches
Mail list logo
