On 8 May 2007 09:04:18 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Petersen,
Jim) wrote:
It is a sad day. I saw what happened to Landmark once ASG took over.
A lot of good people left because of the way ASG handled things. A lot
of good friends remain but some of those are not really happy working
for ASG for
On 8 May 2007 09:28:38 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Justice)
wrote:
How much do *you* think a CEO is worth?
most of them, not even worth five cents. However, for the few (and I do
mean few) good ones, no more than a couple of million dollars, tops.
What process should stockholders use to
On 8 May 2007 11:24:54 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Jaffe)
wrote:
XOM shareholders overwhelmingly agree Mr. Raymond's accomplishments were
worth every penny awarded him by the board -- literally a drop in the
bucket when compared to the company's capitalization and quarterly
dividend
On 4 May 2007 10:36:04 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom
Marchant) wrote:
There are historical (hysterical?) reasons for small block sizes, too. Long
ago,
when you might have only had 120K available for your program and data, you
might have had to keep your blocks much smaller. Today, it's
On 4 May 2007 08:33:04 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark H. Young)
wrote:
Here, here.remember, this is a GOV't Contract.that is FEDERAL Gov't
folks. Military or not, don't matter none. And they can just walk in one day
and say CLEAR OUT.without having to give a reason other than
On 4 May 2007 11:22:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chicklon, Tom)
wrote:
I once worked at a place were the mailroom had a sign in it that read:
NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LOST OR MISPLACED MAIL
Wouldn't we all like to be not responsible for the one and only thing we are
responsible for!
The art
Our mainframe will be replaced within the next 4 years. Lots of my
peers are retiring and working part time with the old system, which
will help tremendously with the rest wanting to be retrained. We
already have Oracle DBAs, so our non-retired IDMS DBA will just move
over (He has retired IDMS
On 3 May 2007 10:17:34 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (R.S.) wrote:
BTW: What is avg (yearly) salary in U.S.A. ?
Average salary for a country doesn't effect the logic someone uses
to determine his value. Otherwise Hollywood or the NBA or a
company's board of directors could offer twice the average
On 3 May 2007 12:12:44 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Levy) wrote:
I went through this exact route. I was a sysprog for a number of years
than transitioned over to software development on the mainframe. I moved
over to development on OS/2 and than windows. The tools and debuggers
made it quite a
On 30 Apr 2007 08:00:17 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas H Puddicombe)
wrote:
Unless you have gotten so old you can't remember what your own code does.
I have had that problem since way before I got old (or at least older).
The
two main reasons why I write lots of comments in my code:
(1)
On 27 Apr 2007 10:36:01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shmuel
Metz , Seymour J.) wrote:
Internet is only a reasonable approach when companies are willing to
provide the same level of quality control over their web sites
The WWW is not the Internet. Why not use FTP?
Offer whatever your customers want
On 27 Apr 2007 09:07:25 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dean Kent) wrote:
The human mind has a limited capacity for organizing information into
something meaningful. It would be interesting to see a graph showing the
percentage of people able to properly handle various levels of complexity,
and I
I wonder if publicizing this will cause companies to be more open to
thinking of IBM when they think of large server needs.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:42:49 -0600, Anne Lynn Wheeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A bit off topic: I find your input to these threads in general to be
quite useful. They appear to take a fair amount of work - are they
part of your jobs, or is this just a style you are comfortable with?
On 25 Apr 2007 05:24:30 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Gilmartin)
wrote:
Is it sufficient explanation that storage used to be expensive?
But why does the deficiency persist into the 21st century?
Change is expensive.
That said, a big reason that OS-X has fewer vulnerabilities than
Windows
On 25 Apr 2007 12:41:18 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John)
wrote:
Paraphrasing: Having so many instructions will simply confuse the
programmer! Better to have one, true way than many.
http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2007/04/the_virtues_of_monoculture
html
This article is basically
On 17 Apr 2007 23:32:35 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even I - as a non-mainframer - see more and more articles which bring
contra arguments against using mainframes.
The article says that people don't consider mainframes as a place to
put their new data warehouse unless they already have
On 18 Apr 2007 09:38:37 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Comstock)
wrote:
Revenue in software, IBM's most important profit
contributor, rose 9%, or 5% adjusted for currency.
About half its growth came from acquisitions.
What makes one profit contributor more important than another?
On 18 Apr 2007 10:54:31 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rugen, Len) wrote:
Future potential
What makes one profit contributor more important than another?
Well, future potential has more than one side.If software has the
biggest potential for IBM, it also has the biggest potential for
On 15 Apr 2007 06:09:39 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shmuel
Metz , Seymour J.) wrote:
That's the classic example, but there are many others. M$ seems to be
in love with the concept of active documents and never takes security
into account when they extend a format to include executable content.
I
On 11 Apr 2007 05:46:57 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerhard Adam)
wrote:
1. There is a limit to the complexity a personal system can tolerate due to
the lack of expertise in the general user, so this becomes a limiting factor
in deployment. These systems will tend to remain portals into larger
On 9 Apr 2007 17:37:45 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Mason)
wrote:
This reminds me of a question I was asked while grubbing for a grant to
take me through university:
Why is it absurd to say there are no two trees in the world with the same
number of leaves?
I guess there are lots of absurd
On 9 Apr 2007 15:35:12 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL)
wrote:
I'm not getting the perspective here - how do I compare these two?
(should we add the number of Windows licenses to the comparison?)
The perspective I failed to communicate is that ORACLE is the largest licensed
DB in the
On 10 Apr 2007 09:51:43 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pommier, Rex
R.) wrote:
Doesn't this simply restart the job at the specified step and continues
execution through the end of the job? I got the impression from Judy's
original question that she just wanted to rerun the specified step.
That, I
On 10 Apr 2007 10:12:37 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Taylor,
Clarence B) wrote:
Oopssorry shouldve been COND=(0,LE)misread column in JCL manual
Nice. Quick test worked.
//ZHBTEST JOB (,'COPY SOME DATA'),
// 'U56,H BRAZEE',RESTART=STEP02,COND=(0,LE),
On 6 Apr 2007 13:10:39 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL)
wrote:
According to a Canadian IBM'r, there are approximately 6,000 mainframe
licences world-wide.
To put it in perspective, there are approximately 230,000 Oracle licences.
I'm not getting the perspective here - how do I compare
On 6 Apr 2007 05:57:25 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Cole) wrote:
And Seymour's right, you then went on to totally miss the point that,
outside of the currently dying FLES-ES offerings, IBM's pricing
structure is simply not affordable to small businesses such as mine
and many others who are
On 3 Apr 2007 14:54:28 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Gilmartin)
wrote:
Ah, but it was easier to migrate from Studebaker to Rambler or
Dodge than from z/OS to Windows. In the most ruthless scenario,
the vendor continues to serve an ever-dwindling captive customer
base at ever-increasing unit
On 4 Apr 2007 09:44:38 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Day) wrote:
If PSI wins, and IBM is forced to license z/OS on any platform, who is going
to be driving the train?
Someone has to. In my opinion, what will kill the mainframe is if the market
becomes a commodities
market where anyone can
On 4 Apr 2007 07:29:23 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon Brock) wrote:
snip
I suspect instead, it wants us to have huge, secure, database machines
that are fast and use up less energy than Windows farms - and IBM
doesn't care how we choose to display the data on our desktops. And
it would be quite
On 4 Apr 2007 12:59:00 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL)
wrote:
Which is a good reason for IBM to not be in the business of selling an
operating system.
And, what would you use to run all your mainframe apps and sub-systems on?
Air?
The OS is a tool for that IBM uses to produce its real
On 1 Apr 2007 17:15:42 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy
Sipples) wrote:
I wish the press and experts would be a little more precise and stop using
the word system. To most people, system means hardware.
I doubt that very much.
On 30 Mar 2007 06:20:29 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Pace) wrote:
Almost makes you want to go back to completely using cash again.
Even cash is plastic now - with gift cards.There are lots of
reasons for not wanting a record of how we spend our money, starting
with buying presents for our
My first CRT based editor was Roscoe. I had lesser editors later.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On 30 Mar 2007 10:01:02 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lindy
Mayfield) wrote:
Thanks Chris. You have in fact hit upon the fundamental problem here: not
mine, but my associate's. As I explained it to my (non-technical) wife, what
he is doing is akin to saying if it takes me an hour to drive into town
On 27 Mar 2007 06:18:39 -0700, vikki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How should i run only step 02 in JCL as step 01 and 03 should not
run???
Is this something that will happen repeatedly, so that you will change
the JCL?
Or would it be easier to make an in-line PROC and edit out 03 for
today?
If
On 28 Mar 2007 06:21:30 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shmuel
Metz , Seymour J.) wrote:
IBM sells lots of things, and I don't see any correlation between
sales figures and quality. The everybody else has one argument is
not an appropriate criterion for purchase decisions.
Except nowadays, everybody
On 23 Mar 2007 09:28:31 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thompson,
Steve) wrote:
No, you have one of the replacement booklets. The S/360-20 ref summary
was a yellow card, similar to the S/360 larger systems Green card. I
used to have one, but someone stole it out of my desk some years ago. I
ordered a
On 27 Mar 2007 08:04:53 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fred Hoffman)
wrote:
I do have a -1 Second Edition (September 1972). I think that is the earliest
one that I have.
Fred Hoffman
TAD
Mine says -2 Third Edition (February 1974)
The corner with the suffix of mine is worn out. I don't see any
On 29 Mar 2007 09:29:41 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shmuel
Metz , Seymour J.) wrote:
Yes I know about ROSCOE and the others (Wylbur etc.) and while they
are OK once you learn them I found I kept wishing that I had ISPF.
When I had ISPF and SuperWylbur® I used both and kept wishing that I
had
On 29 Mar 2007 10:41:40 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shmuel
Metz , Seymour J.) wrote:
If people are doing that, then your charge back policies should be
reviewed. NOT, what the user is doing to get their job done.
The users' jobs include following company policies.
That is correct.But as with
I am still not getting this Hello World Java JCL to work. I've
tries some others I have found on the web.If someone has the time
to look at my input and output, please let me know at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll send it to them off of the
listserver.
Thanks.
Someone came to me, she accidentally opened a print with a large SDSF
file (she typed X by itself).
She's afraid to hit PRINT CLOSE because the doesn't want to print it.
(How does it know that it's XP rather than XD? Or does it act like a
SPSF print?)
On 20 Mar 2007 08:41:25 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Veilleux, Jon
L) wrote:
Try this...the java translations for [] will need to be fixed. One of the
problems of E-Mail and cut and paste. Also you will need to be at a level of
z/OS that supports SYSOUT for STDIN STDERR, or you could change those
On 20 Mar 2007 10:25:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Veilleux, Jon
L) wrote:
Here is a REXX ISPF Edit Macro that will translate square brackets [] to
the correct hex codes. Put it in your CLIST concatination and from he
ISPF edit command line enter 'BRACK' (or whatever you choose to call
it):
It's
On 20 Mar 2007 10:49:19 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Veilleux, Jon
L) wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean. You just copy the exec into a PDS in your
SYSPROC concatination, I used member name 'brack'.
Then when you edit the JAVA source code enter 'brack' on the command
line. I'm not sure where you are
On 20 Mar 2007 11:03:17 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lesseg, Jon)
wrote:
You need to hit the Attention Key (CNTL-F1 on my reflection 3270
emulator) to interrupt the Rexx.
My PA-1 emulation moves me between mainframe accounts (IDMS test,
CA-7, ISPF, etc).
Checking my emulator, attention is CTL-A
I edited the [] to two letters and did a TSO change command to x'ad'
and x'bd' respectively.
I still got:
FSUM1009 Unable to execute the shell.
Options Report for Enclave main 03/20/07 12:46:02 PM
Language Environment V01 R07.00
My keyboard emulator said
On 20 Mar 2007 09:03:04 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John)
wrote:
/TMP should have been /tmp (lowercase). There is not likely to be a /TMP
subdirectory. The original message had it in lowercase, so you edit
session is likely set to CAPS ON. UNIX work pretty much demands CAPS OFF
to not mess
On 20 Mar 2007 12:24:46 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Veilleux, Jon
L) wrote:
You can use OCOPY to send it to SYSOUT similar to this job which issues
'java fullversion' then copies the output to SYSOUT:
//JESSTEP EXEC PGM=BPXBATCH,REGION=8M,
// PARM='SH java
On 20 Mar 2007 12:33:04 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Veilleux, Jon
L) wrote:
Are you on z/OS 1.7 or above? If not then make sure that STDOUT and STDERR are
pointing to HFS files:
Yes.
//STDOUT DD PATH='/tmp/test2.out',PATHOPTS=(OWRONLY,OCREAT)
//STDERR DD
On 13 Mar 2007 11:36:01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave
Kopischke) wrote:
Our SVC 235 is dynamically installed, so it could also mean a product
upgrade is required.
There was an IDMS upgrade this past weekend - we passed this
information to the DBAs.
On 12 Mar 2007 07:05:09 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John)
wrote:
Please remember that the US media is hysteria oriented and loves to feed
fear to the common man (i.e. morons). The biggest problem that I had
was this morning. I hate getting up before the sun rises. I am a diurnal
animal,
On 12 Mar 2007 08:28:56 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL)
wrote:
Another US-Centric series of posts.
Only Canada and the US moved to DST, this weekend past.
And, only the US seems to think it mattered to the rest of the world.
(I was going to say all of North America, but I cannot recall if
On 12 Mar 2007 09:16:39 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chase, John) wrote:
Software could get along fine using GMT/UTC worldwide. *People* who
organize meetings would need to know availability schedules of invitees.
I'm a person who would be glad to go Zulu. But software and I need
to work with
We have a job that runs every Monday giving:
CEE0374C CONDITION=CEE3250C TOKEN=00040CB2
And
JOB02268 IEF450I USCLBRS USCL#2 USCL - ABEND=SFEB U REASON=
618
What is a FEB error?
--
For IBM-MAIN
I thought the SDSF summary command was probably a Rexx program, but I
don't see it in my site's *.REXX.APPL.LIB. Where does this command
exist?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On 9 Mar 2007 09:52:48 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Zelden)
wrote:
IBM distributes it in hlq.SISFEXEC as member ISFESUM which has an
alias of SUMMARY.
Thanks, ISF.SISFEXEC(ISFESUM) is in our ISRDDN path. How does the
alias work?
On 8 Mar 2007 11:36:31 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chase, John) wrote:
You gotta just get used to the new way. The new way is pretty, it's
kewl, you can get around in it with mouse clicks instead of a bunch of
typing, etc.
They gotta get rid of the old way because all it does is work
reliably.
On 1 Mar 2007 21:57:44 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Hewson)
wrote:
what our and we ?!?!
I was responding to someone objecting to outsourcing for security
reasons - I hope that my answer applies to a variable we.
In the example of defeating the USSR, it was the wealth of the West
that won -
On 1 Mar 2007 07:33:23 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hal Merritt)
wrote:
It is an old, proven marketing ploy. Humans are programmed to respond to
any thing 'new'. In ancient times, it could be food for you, or
something that wants to make food of you. Either way, it was a life or
death situation.
A
On 1 Mar 2007 12:59:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thompson,
Steve) wrote:
I'm baffled at outsourcing to countries that are a security risk to the
USofA. Countries that have a sizeable number of Islamic radicals should
not be targets of outsourcing.
How about keeping our business inside our
On 26 Feb 2007 11:28:28 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave
Kopischke) wrote:
I want to hear about the results whether it works or not. If it works, then
I want enough information to evaluate whether this kind of migration might
be beneficial to us.
Most projects are somewhere in between.
On 20 Feb 2007 04:34:59 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vernooy,
C.P. - SPLXM) wrote:
Correct, Dutch and German do it that way.
I never regarded as keen to see time pass by, but more as halfway
towards 8 o'clock. This could both be interpreted, comparable to the
glass either being half full or half
On 19 Feb 2007 18:08:58 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (john gilmore)
wrote:
Likewise, I consider teaching Roman numerals a waste of time.
I instead judge anyone who cannot read (and write) Roman numerals
subliterate.
Why?If someone doesn't know past, say 100 - is that any less
useful as a
On 20 Feb 2007 06:27:40 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ron Hawkins)
wrote:
Some of them probably cannot even read this e-mail and will never need to,
let alone find it necessary to learn a dead number system that for some
unfathomable reason gets tacked on to the end of movie credits.
Not to mention
On 20 Feb 2007 09:06:59 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeffrey D.
Smith) wrote:
Now that FLEX-ES is all but history, a small-time z/OS developer like me has
no choice but to change careers with no safety-net. If any of you are in
the same boat, I sincerely wish you the best of luck.
I would not
On 20 Feb 2007 11:03:30 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Comstock)
wrote:
Change is good.
Well sure. And big change is better than small change.
And big currency is even better.
With some databases, currency is essential.
--
On 20 Feb 2007 13:44:04 -0800, Bo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Today we shut down and boxed up the z/OS system. It's rolling out the
door.
Most of the operation got switched to either an AS/400 or VM/VSE
platform.
It was nice being here. I will lurk a while and then end my
subscription. Everyone
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2096588,00.asp
Opinion: Despite having long since lost its star status in the view
of many IT watchers, the mainframe is showing continued growth and is
beginning to claim a new generation of users.
I try to stay away from clichés. But try as you
On 19 Feb 2007 09:30:33 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John)
wrote:
Since we all are products of our environments, it's obviously
somebody else's fault whenever we do something wrong.
--unsnip--
.About that Mojave Beachfront property I've
On 19 Feb 2007 10:40:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chase, John)
wrote:
Indeed, that was the main reason cited by a former employer for
refusing to implement direct deposit of payroll checks. They budgeted
the projected interest they would earn during the float period between
us cashing or
On 16 Feb 2007 09:05:19 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rick Fochtman)
wrote:
That's true, Walt. But how do you prevent the user from burying his id,
or an anagram of it, in the password without using an exit? We found
that to be the most prevalent security-related issue when we had to
grant acces
On 16 Feb 2007 11:01:44 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown,
John) wrote:
One thing that can be done with the Konqueror web browser and KDE on
Linux is to use KDE Wallet. This is an encrypted file which contains
various userids and passwords. Konqueror (and other software) can
interface with the KDE
On 14 Feb 2007 06:31:32 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John)
wrote:
I think he is - but it might be more secure than in shops that require
passwords that are so strong that people don't remember them, but
write them down on yellow post notes.
This is easy to stop. Restrict distribution and
On 14 Feb 2007 09:14:34 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Gilmartin)
wrote:
Isn't it merely a matter of time, though, before the technology
arises to spoof fingerprint readers? Then we'll need to be
concerned not only that a dishonest waiter copies our credit
cards, but that a dishonest busboy
On 13 Feb 2007 10:49:55 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or are you saying that mixed-case increases security in those rare
shops that haven't implemented revoking IDs on wrong passwords?
I think he is - but it might be more secure than in shops that require
passwords that are so strong that
On 6 Feb 2007 05:59:50 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shmuel Metz ,
Seymour J.) wrote:
Subject: Dorting multiple VSAM and PS files
Check with Dortmunder ;-)
Can we trust him?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On 30 Jan 2007 13:50:10 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (George, William ,
DHS-ITSD) wrote:
Note: I can write a simple REXX to do this but need to do it in SORT.
Double sigh.
Most any language would do this - why do you need to do it in SORT?
On 5 Jan 2007 18:46:42 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Y Odo)
wrote:
So how does one advocate intelligently for its use? I mean, if
Sun+Oracle is better, cheaper, faster, etc. than
z/OS+CICS+ADABAS/Natural why should I be pushing for z/OS?
You shouldn't be pushing for any platform. You
On 30 Jan 2007 11:36:26 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John)
wrote:
Well, since I didn't start this very OFFTOPIC discussion, I feel free to
ask why anybody would upgrade to Vista? Or any other version of Windows?
I've been 99.9% Windows free at home (on Linux) for a couple of years
now
Some
On 29 Jan 2007 02:59:56 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J R) wrote:
Also, there are two dataset disposition fields -- normal and abnormal.
The one that you specified is normal. If you want to specify what happens
in an abend scenario, you need to code a second one.
e.g. DISP=(MOD,KEEP,DELETE)
Or
On 29 Jan 2007 09:03:38 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chase, John)
wrote:
AFAIK they're all SMP/E-installed, so in that regard all are equally
easy to install and maintain. As to ease of use, the one with which
you have the most experience will be easiest to use.
Very true. The hardest part of
On 29 Jan 2007 09:44:00 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Yaeger)
wrote:
Could you explain what you're doing here?
//S1 EXEC PGM=ICETOOL
//TOOLMSG DD SYSOUT=*
//DFSMSG DD SYSOUT=*
//IN DD DSN=... input file (FB/80)
//CTL2CNTL DD DSN=T1,UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(1,1)),DISP=(,PASS)
//OUT DD DSN=...
On 24 Jan 2007 05:13:49 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carol Srna) wrote:
This is driving me crazy. Does anyone know how to recall a sent message in
Lotus Notes?
Lots of e-mail programs have such a feature - which don't work.A
request to recall a sent message only works if the receiving
On 23 Jan 2007 11:00:44 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clark Morris)
wrote:
But how do we get the message across to the non-technical people in
charge of purchasing or authorizing purchase of laptops that this is
important when you can get the My Eyes Glaze Over effect when you try
to explain it to
On 21 Jan 2007 09:01:28 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chase, John)
wrote:
During acceptance testing of z/OS 1.7 one of our testers said the
following:
We used to be able to say RESTART=PSTEP025 or whatever
step. I had to change that to RESTART=STEP001.PSTEP025
This is consistent
On 22 Jan 2007 05:33:23 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Andrews) wrote:
How do you tell the difference between crashes due to memory failures
and crashes due to crapware?
I have a very flaky computer - but repeated long memory tests have not
shown the problem to be memory.A workplace could
On 21 Jan 2007 08:03:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shmuel
Metz , Seymour J.) wrote:
Decades before, people kept printed copies of programs they wrote.
The Devil is in the details. Were those programs proprietary? Did
those people also take copies of legally protected financial or
personnel files?
On 19 Jan 2007 13:18:32 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL)
wrote:
$12? 6/8 GB? (NOTE: That's a 'G' -- GIG!)
When I gave that amount, I did not specify a size.
The small guys are used for copying data from computer to computer -
and they are still larger than mainframe partitions I worked
On 19 Jan 2007 05:58:21 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Gould)
wrote:
OK I was off my 5 or so years. I also realized that they did break
other promises but people (like Timothy) wear rose color glasses in
awe of IBM. The new crop of sysprogs just don't know (or don't care)
about such things.
On 19 Jan 2007 08:57:13 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave
Kopischke) wrote:
So what happens when that disgruntled employee decrypts a tape and
downloads it to a USB memory stick and walks out the door with that ???
Those memory sticks hold a lot of information and they're very small. At
some
On 19 Jan 2007 09:10:53 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One necessary step to security where desktops connect to secure
information is to disable all outbound ports on the desktop. Don't know
if it is a windoz feature or ISV software.
Why not go all the way? Replace the customers' computers
On 19 Jan 2007 09:15:38 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL)
wrote:
Two days after I bought a 6GB USB drive for $117 CDN, I saw an 8GB one at The
Source by Circuit City (formerly Radio Shack), for $105.
I've seen drives for around $12.
Years ago, I saw somebody bring in their own 30GB hard
On 17 Jan 2007 22:26:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy
Sipples) wrote:
Re: Anyone can build a hardware box to run Windows, well, yes, but you
must go to Intel or AMD for the chip. So you have a duopoly -- AMD argues
a monopoly -- on the component that matters. But software is far more
On 17 Jan 2007 01:22:59 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (R.S.) wrote:
However there're names unacceptable to given system. For example, in
Poland we don't use 'X' letter, but we accept it because of foreign
names. But I'm pretty sure your system cannot accept any russian name,
because they use
On 17 Jan 2007 07:31:41 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nigel Hadfield)
wrote:
Well, of course, it depends how you define open. Windows clearly isn't
open source, nor can any company other than Microsoft produce an OS that
looks and feels like Windows. But any company is free to produce a machine
that
On 12 Jan 2007 23:08:13 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert A. Rosenberg)
wrote:
Assuming that everyone on the planet has exactly one middle initial.
I remember a case where the program needed to accept NMI (for No
Middle Initial).
Of course Harry S Truman's middle initial was his middle name.
On 15 Jan 2007 12:23:34 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Gould)
wrote:
At the god unearthly hour of 6AM a nurse tried to take blood from me.
I informed her I was an hard draw. She poked me once and of course
couldn't get any blood. I looked at her and told her: You know the
saying 3 strikes and
On 16 Jan 2007 08:54:19 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom
Marchant) wrote:
There was an article in the early 1970's, I think it was in Computer
World, about someone who tried to change his legal name to a four
digit number. It was denied and noted that it would cause havoc
with computer programs.
901 - 1000 of 1286 matches
Mail list logo
