Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

In <9f0ac04eb56ec643bdb1b36ab0c34583e12...@hdqsrvexcvs.ssfcuad.ssfcu.org>, on 08/01/2011 at 09:27 AM, "Ward, Mike S" said: >Gerhard, I'm sorry for laughing at your post, but it struck me as >funny. Did you really mean to say masticate? Almost certainly. The point was that the politician was a

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

On 8/1/2011 10:27 AM, Ward, Mike S wrote: Gerhard, I'm sorry for laughing at your post, but it struck me as funny. Did you really mean to say masticate? Yes, that's how I remembered it. Unfortunately others don't. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Pepper Part of American political lore

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

>Did you really mean to say masticate? He probably did. It means "chew", and it's an old joke. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masticate Now, pardon me while I go ablute myself. (http://www.allwords.com/word-ablute.html) - Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca Twitter: @TedMacNEIL -

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

Walk and chew gum at the same time? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 8:39 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

a.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY On 7/31/2011 9:37 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > My opponent has publicly > matriculated and his father was a thespian. Not the way I heard it: he was seen to masticate in public, and his sister was a thes

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

My opponent has publicly matriculated and his father was a thespian. Not the way I heard it: he was seen to masticate in public, and his sister was a thespian. There was also a third one I can't recall. --

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

On 7/31/2011 9:37 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: My opponent has publicly matriculated and his father was a thespian. Not the way I heard it: he was seen to masticate in public, and his sister was a thespian. There was also a third one I can't recall. Gerhard Postpischil Bradford, VT

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

In , on 07/25/2011 at 01:18 PM, "Robert A. Rosenberg" said: >It was the use of the description (and misleading >descriptions of the effects and usage) to convince people to sign >petitions to ban its use that makes it part of a hoax Relying on the ignorance of your listeners or readers does

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

At 02:33 -0400 on 07/24/2011, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY: >The description above was part of a hoax Wiki refers to it as a hoax, but I don't see it as any more of a hoax than the famous sign offering access to th

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

l Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Fairchild Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 2:11 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY Hoax or not, the fact remains that DHMO is an

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

: Sunday, July 24, 2011 1:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY In , on 07/23/2011 at 04:59 PM, "Robert A. Rosenberg" said: >The description above was part of a hoax Wiki refers to it as a hoax, but I don't see it as

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

In , on 07/23/2011 at 04:59 PM, "Robert A. Rosenberg" said: >The description above was part of a hoax Wiki refers to it as a hoax, but I don't see it as any more of a hoax than the famous sign offering access to the egress. In fact, the DHMO site does not match wiki's own definition[1] of hoa

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

At 16:37 -0400 on 07/22/2011, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY: >http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html But DHMO is a real compound, and the dangers cited are real. Just (as I posted in a message that crossed with this one) descri

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

At 08:28 -0400 on 07/22/2011, David Andrews wrote about Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY: Tells you something about a group of people when one guy mentions thiotimoline and nobody bats an eyelash. Isaac would be proud to have invented something that everyone (aside

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

At 09:01 -0500 on 07/22/2011, Eric Bielefeld wrote about Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY: OK - I'll bite. What is thiotimoline? I saw it earlier and just ignored it, but now I'm curious. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiotimoline. Basically Scienc

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

In <2FE099896A804AA4859582BC3A930C07@ericnbPC>, on 07/22/2011 at 09:01 AM, Eric Bielefeld said: >OK - I'll bite. What is thiotimoline? A fictitious compound with four bonds at right angles to each other. It dissolves in water a fraction of a second before you add the water, making it highly

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

In <45e5f2f45d7878458ee5ca679697335502e25...@usdaexch01.kbm1.loc>, on 07/22/2011 at 09:29 AM, "Staller, Allan" said: >http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html But DHMO is a real compound, and the dangers cited are real. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

iginal Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Fairchild Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 1:07 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY Where do you find such detailed descriptions? Patent appli

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

dward Jaffe Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 1:19 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY The last time I thoroughly studied/investigated System z branch prediction logic (BPL) was on the z9. On that model, the BPL runs early in the pipeline, b

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

On 7/21/2011 7:19 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: In<4e24b31c.5080...@phoenixsoftware.com>, on 07/18/2011 at 03:26 PM, Edward Jaffe said: Absolutely! There is a multi-stage pipeline that allows the processor to get ahead of the current instruction's execution to fetch and decode instru

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of David Andrews Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 7:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 08:30 -0400, Mark Jacobs wrote: > Sounds almost thiotimoline like to me. Tells you something about a

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

Thanks. I was trying to remember if I've ever read anything by Isaac Asimov, but I can't remember. I think I would have remembered if I had read one of the stories about Thiotimoline. Jee - we are really getting off topic, and I'm not helping! Eric Bielefeld Sr. Systems Programmer IBM Global

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html Al Staller | Z Systems Programmer | KBM Group | (Tel) 972 664 3565 | allan.stal...@kbmg.com Perhaps not the same as intended but ... it's a fictitious compound chemical... there were multiple papers written ... but don't think that the 'actual compound' was eve

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld > > OK - I'll bite. What is thiotimoline? I saw it earlier and just ignored > it, but now I'm curious. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiotimoline -jc-

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

(res) j...@thethomasresidence.us (Email) -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 9:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY OK -

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

frame Discussion List > [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 9:02 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY > > OK - I'll bite. What is thiotimoline? I saw it ear

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

OK - I'll bite. What is thiotimoline? I saw it earlier and just ignored it, but now I'm curious. Eric Bielefeld Sr. Systems Programmer IBM Global Services Division Dubuque, Iowa 414-477-7259 - Original Message - From: "David Andrews" Tells you something about a group of people w

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 08:30 -0400, Mark Jacobs wrote: > Sounds almost thiotimoline like to me. Tells you something about a group of people when one guy mentions thiotimoline and nobody bats an eyelash. ;-) -- David Andrews A. Duda & Sons, Inc. david.andr...@duda.com --

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

In <4e24b31c.5080...@phoenixsoftware.com>, on 07/18/2011 at 03:26 PM, Edward Jaffe said: >Absolutely! There is a multi-stage pipeline that allows the processor >to get ahead of the current instruction's execution to fetch and >decode instructions, resolve addresses, fetch operands, etc. in >a

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

In <4e2578d1.7010...@custserv.com>, on 07/19/2011 at 08:30 AM, Mark Jacobs said: >Sounds almost thiotimoline like to me. Not really, the technology is decades old, but the Devil is in the details, and so far nobody has provided any. I can conceive of designs where AMODE switching causes pipel

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

On 07/18/11 18:26, Edward Jaffe wrote: On 7/18/2011 12:55 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: Are you saying that the processor starts fetching instructions for the branch prior to executing it? Absolutely! There is a multi-stage pipeline that allows the processor to get ahead of the current

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

On 7/18/2011 12:55 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: Are you saying that the processor starts fetching instructions for the branch prior to executing it? Absolutely! There is a multi-stage pipeline that allows the processor to get ahead of the current instruction's execution to fetch and dec

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

In <4e248256.90...@phoenixsoftware.com>, on 07/18/2011 at 11:58 AM, Edward Jaffe said: >If the target AMODE guessed by the hardware is wrong, then it will >have to start over again fetching and interpreting the instructions >in the correct AMODE. Are you saying that the processor starts fetch

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

IIRC Ray Wicks said they achieve about 91% hit ratio from HSB, but that was for XA don't know what the numbers are for 64 bit. In a message dated 7/18/2011 2:17:31 P.M. Central Daylight Time, edja...@phoenixsoftware.com writes: If the target AMODE guessed by the hardware is wrong, then it w

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

On 7/17/2011 11:11 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: Why would a branch with AMODE switching require more pipeline flushing than a branch without? If the target AMODE guessed by the hardware is wrong, then it will have to start over again fetching and interpreting the instructions in the cor

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

In <4e20f40d.2050...@phoenixsoftware.com>, on 07/15/2011 at 07:14 PM, Edward Jaffe said: >There is no way the processor can know in advance which bits will be >on in a branch target register, so its seems likely that the >pipeline must be flushed when 'surprise' AMODE switching occurs for >p

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

Steve Comstock wrote: > > The real issue is what LE uses to switch AMODE when the > setting is AMODE31(OFF); it may be more than just a BASSM > or SAMxx. I don't really know, but I somehow expect overhead > and complexity in that scenario (COBOL interacting with non-LE > Assembler, as specified in

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

>The real issue is what LE uses to switch AMODE when the setting is AMODE31(OFF); it may be more than just a BASSM or SAMxx. I don't really know, but I somehow expect overhead and complexity in that scenario (COBOL interacting with non-LE Assembler, as specified in the OP) Come on now! There is li

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

On 7/15/2011 8:14 PM, Edward Jaffe wrote: On 7/14/2011 12:55 PM, Tom Marchant wrote: On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:40:37 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote: yes, there is some penalty for AMODE switching. What penalty is that, Steve? Do BASSM and BSM run significantly slower than BASR/BALR and BR? There

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

On 7/14/2011 12:55 PM, Tom Marchant wrote: On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:40:37 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote: yes, there is some penalty for AMODE switching. What penalty is that, Steve? Do BASSM and BSM run significantly slower than BASR/BALR and BR? There is no way the processor can know in advanc

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:40:37 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote: >yes, there is some penalty >for AMODE switching. What penalty is that, Steve? Do BASSM and BSM run significantly slower than BASR/BALR and BR? -- Tom Marchant -- For

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

ame Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On > > Behalf Of Chase, John > > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 10:39 AM > > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > > Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY > > > > How would TCB switching occur at all

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

M Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Chase, John > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 10:39 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY > > How would TCB switching occur at all? Are these progr

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

M >To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu >Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY > >Just wanted to add a bit to Peter's advice - > >The LE option ALL31(OFF) instructs [or at least used to] LE to perform AMODE >switching on every dynamic call, AND also to al

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

, 2011 11:18 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY Just wanted to add a bit to Peter's advice - The LE option ALL31(OFF) instructs [or at least used to] LE to perform AMODE switching on every dynamic call, AND also to allocate the

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

Just wanted to add a bit to Peter's advice - The LE option ALL31(OFF) instructs [or at least used to] LE to perform AMODE switching on every dynamic call, AND also to allocate the COBOL EXTERNAL data in storage BELOW the line. So, if you define something like this 001100 01 BELOWEXTER

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

1 11:05 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY These are batch programs that they are working on (I hope, since they are invoking MVS IO routines directly). However, this group of programmers are also heavy CICS users - I did not ask if

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Barkow, Eileen Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 10:30 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY The programmer has a question about possible TCB switching: Option

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 10:39 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY How would TCB switching occur at all? Are these programs running in CICS? If so, you cannot use the DYNAM compiler

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

, July 14, 2011 9:30 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY > > The programmer has a question about possible TCB switching: > > Option 2 seems better. DATA(31) should allow most of the callers storage to reside abov

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 10:41 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY On 7/14/2011 8:30 AM, Barkow, Eileen wrote: >

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

ter x23353 Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 4:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY Option #1 is simpler, that is true. I also forgot to say that the COBOL compiler option DYNAM will also be required so that if the 24-bit assembler program

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY Option #1 is simpler, that is true. I also forgot to say that the COBOL compiler option DYNAM will also be required so that if the 24-bit assembler program is called using CALL literal (like CALL 'MYASMIO'), then it will be loaded at run time

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

, 2011 4:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY Option #1 is simpler, that is true. I also forgot to say that the COBOL compiler option DYNAM will also be required so that if the 24-bit assembler program is called using CALL literal (like

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

ree to ask more questions if you need to. HTH Peter > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Barkow, Eileen > Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 4:06 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

any code changes. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353 Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 11:32 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY Option #1: Use COBOL

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

frame Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Schumacher, Otto Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 11:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY To fix this problem of allowing all storage to be above the line the Assembler I/O subrou

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY On 7/13/2011 1:21 PM, Barkow, Eileen wrote: > Steve, > > I am sorry but I did not see your post with the 3 papers mentioned. > When was it sent? I hope I did not delete it - I get copies of a

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:56 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY On 7/13/2011 12:32 PM, Barkow, Eileen wrote: I passed all the info I got from this list onto the progra

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:56 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY On 7/13/2011 12:32 PM, Barkow, Eileen wrote: > I passed all the info I got f

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

Steve Comstock Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:19 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY On 7/13/2011 11:53 AM, Barkow, Eileen wrote: I meant that linking everything AMODE 24 was the 'only' way the users could get it to work - that i

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

--Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf > Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) > Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 1:48 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY > > In >

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 1:48 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY In , on 07/12/2011 at 11:06 AM, "Barkow, Eileen" said: We have som

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

Wednesday, July 13, 2011 1:48 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY In , on 07/12/2011 at 11:06 AM, "Barkow, Eileen" said: >We have some old Cobol programs that are being upgraded to Enterprise >Cobol and the users wou

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

In , on 07/12/2011 at 11:06 AM, "Barkow, Eileen" said: >We have some old Cobol programs that are being upgraded to Enterprise >Cobol and the users would like to be able to link them as AMODE 31 >RMODE ANY. The problem is that some of these programs call assembler >modules to do the i/o via QSA

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

@bama.ua.edu Subject: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY If you cannot dispense with your RYO I/O routines, use RMODE(SPLIT), which is discussed in the z/OS Program Management User's Guide. I have used it in these situations many times. John Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721-181

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY We have some old Cobol programs that are being upgraded to Enterprise Cobol and the users would like to be able to link them as AMODE 31 RMODE ANY. The problem is that some of these programs call assembler modules to do

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

Thanks John, I will look into RMODE(SPLIT). -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of john gilmore Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 11:43 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY If

running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

If you cannot dispense with your RYO I/O routines, use RMODE(SPLIT), which is discussed in the z/OS Program Management User's Guide. I have used it in these situations many times. John Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721-1817 USA --

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

uesday, July 12, 2011 11:06 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY > > We have some old Cobol programs that are being upgraded to Enterprise > Cobol and the users would like to be able to link them as AMODE 31 RMODE > AN

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

sage- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Barkow, Eileen Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 11:06 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY We have some old Cobol programs that are being upgraded to Enterprise C

Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

On 7/12/2011 9:06 AM, Barkow, Eileen wrote: We have some old Cobol programs that are being upgraded to Enterprise Cobol and the users would like to be able to link them as AMODE 31 RMODE ANY. The problem is that some of these programs call assembler modules to do the i/o via QSAM and VSAM macros

running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY

We have some old Cobol programs that are being upgraded to Enterprise Cobol and the users would like to be able to link them as AMODE 31 RMODE ANY. The problem is that some of these programs call assembler modules to do the i/o via QSAM and VSAM macros (TESTCB, SHOWCB, GET, PUT, PUTX, etc) and the