On 11/21/2018 6:41 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
A half-century ago, I saw a magazine article suggesting that FORTRAN
(*the* language then) should treat '0' and 'O' as interchangable. OK.
I can write "C0NTINUE" instead of "CONTINUE". But it restricts the name
space for variables. (And I wondered
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 18:29:41 -0800, Tom Brennan wrote:
>
>Just today I typed "sstar trek insurrection" into Google and I didn't
>bother to fix the double ss or worry if I spelled that big word
>correctly, because I knew Google would fix it for me.
>
A half-century ago, I saw a magazine article
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:02:31 -0500, Phil Smith III wrote:
>
>Yeah, that's bad too. It's always seemed to me that a well-designed system
>would take input, uppercase the parts that don't need
>case sensitivity (the non-USS bits, in z/OS, due to the historical UNIX
>mistake-oops, there I go
Maybe someday everything will be like Google, so I can type DNS= (which
I do often enough) and the system will ask me "Did you mean DSN?"
Just today I typed "sstar trek insurrection" into Google and I didn't
bother to fix the double ss or worry if I spelled that big word
correctly, because I
Gil wrote:
>MitM?
Key word was "accidental". Don't think MitM qualifies, does it?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Gil wrote, in part:
>"Right/wrong" and "broken/fixed" are highly subjective.
True. I was being a bit provocative, deliberately.
To the folks who mention other languages: I disbelieve that anyone was worried
about those when UNIX was created. Happy to hear
evidence to the contrary, but a
File 33 CBT:
//***FILE 033 is from the SHARE JES2 Committee, and contains * FILE 033
//* the Year 2001 version of the SHARE JES2 Songbook, * FILE 033
//* from which the songs are taken, to be sung at the * FILE 033
//* famous "JES2 Sing-Along" session on Thursday night * FILE 033
//* at all SHARE
It's especially sad that the SHARE JES2 Singalong has withered into oblivion.
This would have made a sterling entry.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
It results in SNA sense code 088A0003 (resource not available) and how that
is handled depends upon the terminal type and definition. If you are
asking about Telnet (TN3270/E) terminals then that in turn depends on the
Telnet configuration such as AUTOLOGON. Most likely no MSG10 but it may be
Interesting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Istanbul_(Not_Constantinople)
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pew, Curtis G
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 3:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
No; UNPK sets "unsigned" zones over the leftmost digits. That's why you have
the funny offset for the translate table when you use UNPK and TR to translate
from binary to hex.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe
I'm recompiling C/C++ modules for 64-bit using c89.
My compiler options are
ENUM(INT),DLL(NOCBA),langlvl(LIBEXT),ARCH(5),TUNE(7),GONUMBER,FLAG(I),XPLINK(STOREARGS),EXPORTALL,SPILL(448),LP64,GOFF
I'm getting this message:
CCN8806 (W) The linkage specifier "OS_DOWNSTACK" is not supported in the
Yes 3590 is generic rather than an esoteric that you can define at your
site.
If you are just referring to the data set with DISP=OLD or DISP=MOD, and
not specifying "UNIT=", the system will assign the output device based on
the catalog entry. This was helpful when my previous site converted
Those aren't ASCII.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 6:13 PM
To:
The 7090 did not have anything special for EBCDIC, but it could select 6-bit or
8-bit mode for data on a 301 or 1302; I don't recall the details.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
On Nov 21, 2018, at 2:10 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
>
> [sound of clapping]
>
> One nit: Islip, right? Or was Icelip a joke that went over my head?
>
The day before Thanksgiving is pretty much the same as Friday, right?
Anyway, my nit would be with the subject. While They Might Be Giants did
Isn't 3590 a generic?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Tony Thigpen
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 7:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: OS/390 (not z/OS) question
And if you ask them to read it back, you cannot guaranty that what they read
back is what they actually typed.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Wednesday,
Just recognized that the parameter STATE=INACTIVE was missing in my
previous post
SETPROG EXIT,MODIFY,EXITNAME=SYS.IEFUSI,MODNAME=IEFUSI,STATE=INACTIVE
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
[sound of clapping]
One nit: Islip, right? Or was Icelip a joke that went over my head?
Charles (a different Charles)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Chris Hoelscher
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 1:51 PM
To:
Trying to follow-up on the stuff that Peter has suggested, I'm still
chasing that elusive '54M' - Who sets it? Where is it set? How can I
override it?
It seems you missed this statement in my first reply in this thread:
IEFUSI will gin control in the BPXAS address space before the UNIX process
Here is more information on the CBTTape.Org file 900 which may provide more
information for the OP and others:
//***FILE 900 is a set of programs which run under either old MVS
//* or z/OS to calculate MD5 checksums. Please see the
//* member called @FILEMD5, which
This is what standalone restore is for, Sean. But if you don't have one built,
you could try this: http://www.cbttape.org/~jjaeger/zzsa.html.
I've used it before but not on anything more recent than a z10. If it will
IPL, you can find your IEFUSI module and make it like IEFBR14.
First
I'm researching options for a DR exercise and we found our main session manager
product requires that the license codes be updated before it will work. Gets us
in a catch-22 in that if you don't plan the DR then you don't have the DR
license keys and thus when we IPL the session manager will
Agreed RE: "SHA-1 not secure". The security concerns with the use of
SHA-1 relate to long-term hashes of security credentials like X.509
certificates. If you just want a decent checksum and aren't worried about
the *very* unlikely possibility of the same hash for two different
documents, then
z/os was os/390
Now it's z/os , not os/390
Been a long time gone, Oh os/390
Now it's Poughkeepsie delight on a moonlit night
Every sysprog in os/390
Codes for z/os , not os/390
if you've got a billing rate for os/390
It'll be higher in z/os
Even old Islandia was once New East Icelip
I'm assuming that OP has no other functioning OS, no ability to edit or zap the
failing system externally. I've never actually done this and don't have any
example, but you might be able to use the IPL LOADPARM to force operator
prompting at NIP. That lives in HMC on the IPL screen. If you
if your using the PROG00 member to add the exit, deleting the member does
nothing, you will probably need to issue a SETPROG EXIT DELETE,EXITNAME=xx
too late now but remove this EXIT ADD if it exists
maybe this will help
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Gleann"
Thanks, Allan, but I can't get any tasks of any nature started - no VTAM,
no TSO, so no copy is possible.
(I'll squirrel that 'SYS1.AOSB3' info away, though, for possible future
reference - hopefully never)
Sean
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 16:38, Allan Staller wrote:
> If you have customized
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:13:33 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 16:07:24 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote about UNPK:
>>It sets the zone bits to F when in EBCDIC mode and to 5 when in ASCII mode.
>>
>5? I would have expected 3:
Yes, in retrospect, I would have expected 3 too. Remember
If you have customized IEFUSI, reassemble you customized exit.
IF not, copy SYS1.AOSB3 to SYS1.LLPALIB and re-ipl.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Sean Gleann
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Region
Trying to follow-up on the stuff that Peter has suggested, I'm still
chasing that elusive '54M' - Who sets it? Where is it set? How can I
override it?
So, I created an IEFUSI that, whatever size is requested, whether it be
below, above or MEMLIMIT, you get '0M'.
Which, I agree, is probably a bit
My takeaway from the Shark Tank story is that sometimes you CANNOT guess what
the person at other end of the line is actually typing. I've had a few similar
conversations where I was blown away when I finally saw in SYSLOG what was
being entered. It becomes a quagmire of misdirected
I think he was typing 0 and not ZERO.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 9:28 AM Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On 2018-11-20, at 11:26:22, Phil Smith III wrote:
> >
> > I’ve also always been surprised that no *ix implementation ever bit the
> > bullet and tried
On 2018-11-20, at 11:26:22, Phil Smith III wrote:
>
> I’ve also always been surprised that no *ix implementation ever bit the
> bullet and tried to fix case sensitivity. Windows, of course, got it right;
> alas, given the historical antipathy *ix folks have for Windoze, I fear
> that’s all the
Tony,
As you noticed, 3590-1 is a system generated 'generic' names of all your tape
devices. The conventions are shown here:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.arci000/taptabl.htm
In order to steer your allocations to the proper sub-device type, you
Calligraphic styles in Arabic (and other languages using the Arabic script) are
more akin to fonts in western scripts. Letters do change shapes based on the
context i.e. standing alone, at the beginning, middle or end of a word but
that's nothing like upper / lower case. Shape of a letter does
I am currently running z/OS 2.1 and WebSphere application server for z/OS v7
and want to upgrade to z/OS 2.3. Has anyone run WebSphere application server
for z/OS v7 under z/OS 2.3?
I know that the 'official' answer from IBM is that WebSphere v7 is not
supported under z/OS 2.3, but we will not
Thinking back and firing up those old brain cells I recall my lead MVS guy use
to export the IODF, alter it as he needed to (adding new esoterics?) and import
it back to HCD and build the IODF and IOCDS.
I've never done this and I'm not sure your level of HCD will support it but
it's worth a
All,
Just a bit of a heads up for anyone that may already have OSPROTECT z/OS
support installed. I was just getting around to start playing with this in my
sandbox environment. Hadn't gotten around to it until now because we didn't
have the required MCL's applied to our Z14's.Now that I
When I use HCD to 'Work with EDTs', it shows locally defined esoterics,
but not the one for 3590-1.
When I use HCD to 'View generics by name', I see 3590-1, but I can't
change it.
Can I just add a 3590-1 in 'Work with EDTs' and then that override the
one the system generates?
Tony Thigpen
Hi
Look redbook SG24-5597 Apr 2000
ABC OS/390 Vol 1has EDT and HCD/IOCP
Giovanni
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 12:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
Hi,
I have to make a change in my IODF.
It will require a lot of software (MVSCP) type definitions (option 1 .1 in HCD).
Is there any way to export these definitions as MVSCP commands, and the import
them into HCD?
I've done this with IOCP type definitions, but I can't find a way to do this
for
I don't think it is in there, Bin.
Yeah ... g.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 7:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Where is the BEA displayed
Hi
I believe in OS/390 V2.10 you will need a DECK for IOCP and run some batch
job to compile that
Look for MVSCP or IOCP
Regards
Giovanni
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
Sent: Wednesday, November 21,
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:59:03 -0500, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>In an OS/390 2.10 system. where is the esoteric 3590-1 defined? Can it
>be overridden?
>
>We are trying to migrate an old OS/390 system and the first stage is to
>migrate the tape usage to a VTL. The VTL looks like 3590-128trk while
>the
Are you able to share what your application cares about, in its resmgr,
with respect to the DCB?
Have you opened the DCBs in the mainline, not closed them in the mainline,
and then expected the RESMGR to close them?
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
In an OS/390 2.10 system. where is the esoteric 3590-1 defined? Can it
be overridden?
We are trying to migrate an old OS/390 system and the first stage is to
migrate the tape usage to a VTL. The VTL looks like 3590-128trk while
the old 3590s are 3590-256trak.
The problem is that when an
I am looking at an LE dump of an 0C1 due to a branch to the middle of an
instruction. If this was a normal dump I would look at the BEA in the RTM2WA
to figure out where the bad branch was. The location of the BEA dad does not
appear obvious to me.
--
Binyamin Dissen
Hello Mate,
Please find my response below.
Can you provide the error message that was received? Masking any company
specific details. - Attached
When you say fails - what specifically fails? What access was needed.
What access was available? - CA Endevor batch job got failed due to it has
It worked after changing the client side AUTOTAPEMOUNT to true.
So internally what does it happens ?
It restores the data from tape to DASD temporarily and sends the data to
server ?
On Tue 20 Nov, 2018, 10:58 PM Jousma, David <
01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> Here is
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:36:56 +, Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh
wrote:
>Is there any utility for z/OS that lets us create SHA1 or MD5 or some such
>hash/fingerprint of a dataset or USS file.
>The use case is to compare these hashes at source (z/OS) and destination
>(linux) after transferring
52 matches
Mail list logo
