But, even with DIAG 8, the limit is 240 chars for the command.
'CP MSG ' silently truncates the message
call diag 8,'MSG ...' gives a REXX syntax error if the command is too
long.
Kris,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support
On Wednesday, 08/02/2006 at 01:10 MST, Don Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday, 08/03/2006 at 01:32 ZE2, Kris Buelens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, even with DIAG 8, the limit is 240 chars for the command.
'CP MSG ' silently truncates the message
call diag 8,'MSG ...' gives a REXX syntax error if the command is too
long.
Duh. I know this. There is
Thanks for the responses to far. We definitely use MSG.
I need to elaborate.
I have an EXEC that runs on my userid, lets call that user STEVE
The PropOp userid is HAL g
The EXEC I run on STEVE basically edits what is typed in and if the data
typed in meets the req'd criteria, it repackages the
That should be simple enough and should work without a hitch on 5.2 (or any
release). Are you really really sure that the RTABLE is not catching the
message somewhere else? Can you copy your RTABLE entry and post it? I
would sort of expect it to look like:
On Thursday, 08/03/2006 at 08:34 EST, Steve Gentry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the file name is 7 chars or less it
works fine, when file name is 8, it
appears to never get to HAL. The problem is I don't know if it's
getting to
HAL and the RTABLE is ignoring it
or if it plain doesn't
Hello,
I would like to share a volume on multiple zVM systems. Each
system would have different area on the volume they could write to, the other
areas would be read only. Each system needs to be able to write to this volume
at the same time. Is this do-able? If so, how is this
I figured it out
I could share the volume on 4 of 5
systems, but was having a problem getting the 5th system to work
It is resolved now.
Thank you.
Cecelia Dusha
From: Dusha, Cecelia Ms.
WHS/ITMD
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006
4:36 AM
To: 'The IBM z/VM Operating
On Thursday, 08/03/2006 at 10:21 GMT, Dusha, Cecelia Ms. WHS/ITMD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could share the volume on 4 of 5 systems, but was having a problem
getting
the 5th system to work? It is resolved now.
It would be great if you could tell us what problem you encountered and
how
Gee, the modern version of a bent pin in a channel cable (them big old
heavy ugly grey variety)
Lee
David Boyes wrote:
Have someone experienced with the use of an optical reflectometer check
the connectors on the cables. A loose or imperfectly formed joint on a
fiber jumper will cause
Folks,
Ive collected the suggested edits/changes and will be
updating the draft outline this week with the suggestions and will post it for
review. Also, several people have requested to write certain chapters
if youre interested in volunteering to do such, please let me know and Ill
From the Running Guest Operating Systems
manual:
The QUERY SIGNALS command can be used to determine whether a
guest is enabled to receive shutdown signals.
How does a guest enable oneself for signal support ?
Thanks
Mike
Hello,
Is there a place where some or all the SHARE VM Linux presentaions can
be obtained?
Phil
--
'in media stat virtus'
Virtue's in the middle
That was my original question! I cannot seem to find
any documentation regarding that.
David Wakser
From: Horlick, Michael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006
10:32 AMTo: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUSubject: Signal
support
How does a guest enable oneself for
signal
On Thursday, 08/03/2006 at 10:31 AST, Horlick, Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the ?Running Guest Operating Systems? manual:
The QUERY SIGNALS command can be used to determine whether a guest is
enabled
to receive shutdown signals.
How does a guest enable oneself for signal
Title: RE: Signal support
Alan any guess as how to enable it in z/VSE or that other OS?
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 10:06 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re:
Its done programmatically. You use the SERVC opcode to write an event mask
that has a bit on that says youll accept a given signal. Your program also
needs to setup an external interrupt handler to field the signal when it
comes. Have a look at the SHUTTRAP program on the VM Download Library.
Either the SHARE DVD or linuxvm.org. I already sent a link to my
presentation to Mark.
Phil Tully wrote:
Hello,
Is there a place where some or all the SHARE VM Linux presentaions can
be obtained?
Phil
--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: 414-491-6001
Ans Service: 360-715-2467
Title: RE: Signal support
Alan:
We recently moved all our VSE guests from under
a VM 2.3 system to z/VM 5.1 and we did NOTHING to enable it in any VSE - yet ALL
VSE machines show up as SIGNAL enabled! Explanation please?
David Wakser
From: Huegel, Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
VM 2.3 didnt support signals. I think it came in 4.2 or 4.3.
Alan:
We recently moved all our VSE guests from under a VM 2.3 system to z/VM
5.1 and we did NOTHING to enable it in any VSE - yet ALL VSE machines show
up as SIGNAL enabled! Explanation
Title: RE: Signal support
But none of that was ever done here, yet the VSE guests all show up as SIGNAL enabled!
David Wakser
-Original Message-
From: Neale Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 11:12 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re:
Title: RE: Signal support
Neale:
Yes, but if something needs to be DONE to enable the guests, yet we did nothing but move them under z/VM 5, how did they become enabled?
David Wakser
-Original Message-
From: Neale Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 03,
Rich Smrcina wrote:
Either the SHARE DVD or linuxvm.org. I already sent a link to my
presentation to Mark.
Phil Tully wrote:
Hello,
Is there a place where some or all the SHARE VM Linux presentaions
can be obtained?
Phil
ThanksI knew I had been looking at them...
Phil
--
'in
On Thursday, 08/03/2006 at 11:13 AST, Wakser, David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We recently moved all our VSE guests from under a VM 2.3 system to
z/VM
5.1 and we did NOTHING to enable it in any VSE - yet ALL VSE machines
show up
as SIGNAL enabled! Explanation please?
I'm not sure what
The supervisor can just execute the SERVC and write the appropriat event
mask. If the underlying VM system doesnt support the signal then itll
either be a no-op or youll get a return code in the SERVC plist. z/VSE can
detect this and ignore the case where VM doesnt support it or take
advantage
Title: RE: Signal support
Alan:
A previous post mentioned that the only way the facility could be enabled in VSE was through a special PTF that IBM had provided to one customer. Now the question is: why did he need that PTF? This whole matter seems poorly documented from the VSE side.
I have no idea of z/OS supports the signal or not.
Empirical results indicate that z/OS 1.7 does not specifically register
for SIGNAL SHUTDOWN.
We have 3 to 4 z/OS guests running on z/VM 5.2, along with several Linux
(SLES9) guests.
CP QUERY SIGNALS ALL ALL
shows the Linux and SFS servers,
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 10:28 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Signal support
snip
I have no idea of z/OS supports the signal or not.
snip
Alan
If you pay SHARE, you can get them from www.share.org.
Most are available from (or have pointers to them) located on
www.linuxvm.org.
David Boyes
Sine Nomine Associates
Is there a place where some or all the SHARE VM Linux presentaions
can
be obtained?
Phil
Hello,
We have *very* large TPF dumps held
(currently in packed form - but that could change) on disk.
What we are looking for is a suitable
tool for browsing the larger ones. XEDIT does a fantastic job for the smaller
dumps.
One problem we have is that the same
users also use an old tool (for
On Thursday, 08/03/2006 at 11:30 AST, Wakser, David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A previous post mentioned that the only way the facility could
be
enabled in VSE was through a special PTF that IBM had provided to one
customer.
Now the question is: why did he need that PTF? This whole
We use the Dump Analyzer by Micro Information Systems. It is able to
take dumps as large as a pack and format them very nicely. I'm pretty sure
it's reasonably priced.
Thursday, August 03, 2006 8:59 AMTo: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUcc:
From: Colin Allinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Browsing
We also
use Dump Analyzer and have been satisfied with it. It is designed for processing
TPF dumps. If it is too steeply priced, the freebie SHOW performs all of the
required functions. In fact, it incorporates many more of the XEDIT
capabilities.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
Since I can not attend SHARE this time around, could someone that does
attend this BOF keep me in the loop, please?
Thanks a lot.
DJ
Mike Walter wrote:
While this is a terrific collaborative project for the VM Community at
Large, would it be helpful to schedule a working BOF (Birds of a
On Aug 2, 2006, at 9:24 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
You can either activate the FTP server command exit and sample, or use
TCPSNIFF to watch what's going on. A separate data connection is
always
used, even for passive FTP. An ephemeral port number is used.
If passive FTP is really being used,
For those sites who have it enabled, do you have this IUCV statement in
your directory? It appears to be a pre-requisite but isn't mentioned in
the discussion here or on the VM list.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ken Meyer
Sent: August
On Thursday, 08/03/2006 at 09:34 MST, Tom Cluster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We think we know what's happening. This message was introduced to VM
in an apar that added Ficon functionality. (I found this on
Google.) We don't use Ficon on the mainframe, but we do use it on
the other side (the
On Aug 3, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
I believe you. No errors on the TCPIP console at initialization?
Only the usual ones about gateways that don't exist because the CTCs/
IUCVs on them aren't hooked up (TCPIP2 is our experimental stack that
I can play with without worrying
You need to get the Linux guests directly on the VSWITCH and get out of
the virtual router business. The VSWITCH will be responsible for managing
OSA redundancy at a physical level rather than an IP routing level.
plug
I'll be presenting Guest LAN to VSWITCH Migration at SHARE in
On Thursday, 08/03/2006 at 11:50 ZE3, Shimon Lebowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
plug
I'll be presenting Guest LAN to VSWITCH Migration at SHARE in
Baltimore.
/plug
For those of us unable to get to Baltimore (much as I would love
to, it's where I lived before my Aliya [=immigration to
39 matches
Mail list logo
