Hi Neil,
There is no configuration file setting that I know of. Instead, use the
PASSIVE FTP subcommand at the start of your FTP session to set passive
mode on.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Neil Carson
Sent:
Lee
How is the OSA defined OSE or OSD.?
Try a Q ccuu ID and a Q CCUU and post the details.
eric
At 08:54 PM 3/8/2007, you wrote:
Hi all,
I have a 4.4 system that's moving to a new z9 and when they try to start
the TCP/IP connection through the new OSA gigabit (fiber, not copper),
they
We have 5 on one stack and 3 on another stack but I know not why.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aria Bamdad
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 5:05 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Multiple VM SMTP servers
Hi,
Is anyone
My assumption was that he just wanted to get out of the currently running
program, rather than returning to the calling routine, in which case,
exiting, possibly with a non-zero return code might fill the bill. Now, if
the subroutine were called by other means, then an exit might still get
you
Well you could I suppose one could write a CMS MODULE that does a B 14 and call
it - that will certainly kill the running programs, but all hell would break
loose -
Not that I'm recommending this.
David
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of RPN01
Why is the home address for the ESC1 link placed in the
OSA for device DEVGEF11 that is connected to another network
DEVICE CIP1 CLAW 7F00 LTCPIP TN19C10 NONE 20 20 4096 4096
LINK ESC1 IP 0 CIP1
DEVICE DEVGEF11 OSD 3DB0 NONROUTER AUTORESTART
LINK
I will be out of the office starting 03/09/2007 and will not return until
03/12/2007.
I will be out of the office Friday 3/9 and will return Monday 3/12. I will
respond to your note after 3/12. Thank you.
I've got a site that is trying to use their VM system (4.4 on an IFL) to
stage MVS volumes for disaster recovery.
They dump the MVS system off using DFDSS, and restore them onto the
disaster system using standalone DFDSS under VM
This way they don't need to actually run and licence MVS on the
Nothing's wrong your suggestion. It's better and I'll change my code.
Background:
IIRC it's just that I had it written to go through the spring of 2042 (the
fall of 2042 is after the TOD clock wraps). Then I discovered that
CPSYNTAX accepts dates in 2042, but CP balks at IPL for any dates
Brian
I am pretty sure that IFL's can only run z/VM and Linux.
HCPMCV1459E The
virtual machine is placed in check-stop state due to a system=20=20=20=20=
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
malfunction with CPU 00.=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=
On 3/9/07, Mike Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... and IBM has better things to work on than something 35 years from now,
...
That's what everybody was saying back in 1965 about the y2k problem. :-)
unsubscribe Play Flexicon: the crossword game that feeds your brain. PLAY now for FREE.
Correct. An IFL will not run z/OS, or z/VSE code.
On 3/9/07, Eric Schadow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian
I am pretty sure that IFL's can only run z/VM and Linux.
--
Mark Pace
Mainline Information Systems
Hello Lee,
I am running a Gigabit with the card defined as QDIO on a z890
running zVM 4.3 (yes 5.2 is waiting here too).
The card came defined as QDIO.
But I did apply lots of PTF's to ensure that the z890 and the
QDIO stuff would run.
Take a look here
Jeff Henry wrote:
On 3/9/07, *Mike Walter* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... and IBM has better things to work on than something 35 years
from now, ...
That's what everybody was saying back in 1965 about the y2k problem. :-)
And because they said that, them
I'm wondering what priority means in HELP EXECSTAT:
With the RESident Option:
Code Meaning
0 Exec exists in storage. Register 1 contains pointer to the fileblock.
4 Exec exists in storage and there is another one on dasd that has a
higher priority. Register 1 contains a
Well, here's my idea... (no proof though)
To me higher priority would mean it is the one that runs so even
if there is a copy in storage, it won't be run, instead favoring the
higher priority copy on DASD.
I don't know where/how the priority gets set though... :-( (Perhaps an
Back in the '70s I was part of a group that spec'ed out a replacement mainframe.
$1 million dollars for each MB of ram. That was when a million was a lot of
money.
Programmers cost about $14,000 a year.
Got two bits unused in your data structure? Make them flag bits.
And, of course, the
On: Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:46:56AM -0800,Don Russell Wrote:
} Well, here's my idea... (no proof though)
}
} To me higher priority would mean it is the one that runs so even
} if there is a copy in storage, it won't be run, instead favoring the
} higher priority copy on DASD.
}
} I don't
I remember there being a thread on this or a related topic, altho I
doubt if the subject would match, back in about 1998 on VMESA-L.
Jim
Rich Greenberg wrote:
On: Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:46:56AM -0800,Don Russell Wrote:
} Well, here's my idea... (no proof though)
}
} To me higher priority
Has anyone come across when issuing the put2prod that the system netid
file on 190 disk is overwritten. I have had to recover this file twice
now when putting on a PTF. Is this file being copied from somewhere
else that I don't know about.
Thanks
Frank J. Sikich Jr.
EPS - MVS Support, but
It has to do with the CMS SET INSTSEG setting. If the critter in question
lives on a disk higher in the file mode of the INSTSEG setting, then that
copy is going to get the priority.
For instance ours is normal set to file mode L. I set it to A and copied
FILELIST EXEC from the 190 to my A
Sikich, Frank J. wrote:
Has anyone come across when issuing the put2prod that the system netid
file on 190 disk is overwritten. I have had to recover this file
twice now when putting on a PTF. Is this file being copied from
somewhere else that I don't know about.
Yes - the 490 disk, which
Frank,
Check the copy of SYSTEM NETID on the MAINT 490 minidisk. PUT2PROD will
first rebuild the CMS nucleus on the 490 disk and then copy the contents of
MAINT
490 to MAINT 190. If the SYSTEM NETID file on 490 is different than your
190 copy,
this could explain why you have to keep recovering
On Friday, 03/09/2007 at 11:35 EST, Phil Smith III
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering what priority means in HELP EXECSTAT:
With the RESident Option:
Code Meaning
0 Exec exists in storage. Register 1 contains pointer to the
fileblock.
4 Exec exists in storage and
Without getting into too much detail (mostly because I can't remember the
history), the z/VM TCP/IP stack sends ALL of the IP addresses in its HOME
list down to any OSA that it is attached to. Changes have been made to
the OSA driver in z/VM 5.3.0 such that this no longer occurs.
Regards,
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:02:16 -0500 Aria Bamdad said:
That helps thanks. I have 2 more questions:
1-If I move the outgoing servers to a different port, I also need to tell
all my clients to send mail on that port. That's kind of a pain. Would
it make sense to just add servers to port 25 and let
Back then we used 1 a character year, 0-9 was 1950-1959, A-J was 1960-1969 and K-T was 1970-1979. If
you want to know why look at the punch card code. 0-9 was a single punch. A-J was a + (12 punch)
with a 0-9. K-T was a - (11 punch) with a 0-9. We knew that this would break in 1980 but we
When the OS/390 guys ask me why I do VM I respond, Because I cannot handle the
real world!
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Parmelee, Phil
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 1:45 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM second
On Friday, 03/09/2007 at 09:14 CST, Brian Ferguson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They have dumped the MVS volumes to tape using DFDSS.
And are attempting to use a standalone version of DFDSS to place the
volumes onto DASD attached to the VM image.
DFDSS is a z/OS utility and z/OS is not licensed
But I don't understand how restoring under VM and then IPLing MVS in
another LPAR or on another nearby CEC is any faster than restoring in the
LPAR and then IPLing the restored system in an LPAR. They are serial
activities.
They are serial activities. True in an LPAR. But VM offers this
Stephen Frazier wrote:
Back then we used 1 a character year, 0-9 was 1950-1959, A-J was 1960-1969 and K-T was 1970-1979. If
you want to know why look at the punch card code. 0-9 was a single punch. A-J was a + (12 punch)
with a 0-9. K-T was a - (11 punch) with a 0-9. We knew that this would
A gotcha if you are intending to get a starter system up and running
with the *MVS *version of DFDSS or ADRDSSU or whatever it's called is
that it cannot restore a CPVOL initialized disk. Says so right there in
the ADRDSSU manual. We are doing our D/R with the idea of getting up a
small
Is anyone running multiple VM SMTP servers to address problems with
mail agents getting timeouts because VM SMTP is busy?
I have in the past. You can run multiple servers listening on the same
port by specifying multiple PORT statements in the TCPIP profile for
port 25 with different userids.
But I don't understand how restoring under VM and then IPLing MVS in
another LPAR or on another nearby CEC is any faster than restoring in
the
LPAR and then IPLing the restored system in an LPAR. They are serial
activities.
Restoring a 1 pack VM system, then doing multiple DFDSS restores
Alan Altmark wrote:
DFDSS is a z/OS utility and z/OS is not licensed to run on IFLs. As
you've discovered, there is a reason we don't license z/OS to IFLs: it
won't run. If you plan to restore an MVS system from VM, use DDR to back
it up. DDR is designed to run on any type of CPU.
On Friday, 03/09/2007 at 05:30 EST, David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Restoring a 1 pack VM system, then doing multiple DFDSS restores allows
you to have multiple restores occur in parallel, up to the number of
tape drives you have available, which dramatically speed up the restore
On Friday, 03/09/2007 at 05:30 EST, Tony Harminc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Alan Altmark wrote:
DFDSS is a z/OS utility and z/OS is not licensed to run on IFLs. As
you've discovered, there is a reason we don't license z/OS to IFLs: it
won't run. If you plan to restore an MVS system from
That use of orthogonal is common in computer science. Axes at right ang
les (orthogonal) are
used to represent independent variables. These variables can be manipulat
ed independently. So in
this sense orthogonal and independent are similar. But in computer sc
ience they talk about
orthogonal
No, finite fields cannot be ordered. In any ordered field 1 2 3 4
..., which implies the field
must be infinite. (If it were to loop around, it would violate the axio
ms defining an ordering.)
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:23:45 -0600, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s.com wrote:
It may be possible
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 11:45:25 +1100, Graeme Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Fellow Listers,
I have been asked if we need High Level Assembler.
We have three exits that I know of
- VMSECURE but this can be done in REXX.
- RACF (I have read CMS Assembler is OK)
- RSCS - still to be examined
Does
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:09:32 -0600, RPN01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My assumption was that he just wanted to get out of the currently runnin
g
program, rather than returning to the calling routine, in which case,
exiting, possibly with a non-zero return code might fill the bill. Now,
if
the
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:05:28 -0500, Aria Bamdad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone running multiple VM SMTP servers to address problems with
mail agents getting timeouts because VM SMTP is busy?
I was planning on adding one more SMTP server listening at the same port
.
Is there a way to
43 matches
Mail list logo
