I have a directory entry VMTEST for a second level VM. (z/vm v5r1)
I am trying to put a Linux guest on second level. I have DEDICATE
statements for the dasd it needs but second level does not see this
dasd:
HCPLNM108E VMTEST 163C not linked; volid LX163C not mounted
HCPLNM108E VMTEST 165F not
Anne,
If you put:
User_Volume_Include *
in your SYSTEM CONFIG of your 2nd level system, then all the available
volumes will be attached to system at IPL time.
Ronald van der Laan
Based on the messages not linked it would seem you are not using
DEDICATE statements in the Linux directory entries, but LINK statements.
You would either need to change those statements, or attach those
volumes to SYSTEM so that the link statements can work.
David Wakser
-Original
I didn't quite state that right. I'm signed onto VMTEST on first level
when I did the queries. Linux directory entry is in USER DIRECT on
VMTEST 191 and looks like this:
USER WVLNX30 WVLNX30 512M 1024M G
IPL CMS PARM AUTOCR
det 163c from system
HCPDTS121E DASD 163C not attached to system
Ready(00121); T=0.01/0.01 09:10:47
det 163c from all
I see a mix in the directory entry for VMTEST:
- you seem to use DEDICATE to pass the VM volumes to VMTEST
- but use MDISK to pass the Linux volumes
You could use DEDUCATE for all of them
A lesson about devices (something I explained several times when teaching.
At the time there was not a
Hello Alan,
What you have stated here about FileZilla is interesting. I know am
about to ask something that has to do with another operating system, but
in seeing about what happens with VM it might help me better understand
an take a similar route with VSE and get it resolved with the vendors. I
Or LINK fullpack ucb ucb M (MW or RR) on in the PROFILE EXEC of VMTEST
if you have a fullpack minidisk holder id.
We LINK RR for 1st level volumes that VMTEST is to have READ only.
VMTEST volumes all start VM2 (for VM 2nd Level) and LINK them MW.
Each to his own.
-Original Message-
In VMTEST, I was only using DEDICATE for hipersocket devices??? not for
any volumes..
The MDISK was the only way I could think to make VMTEST see that dasd.
I don't understand why the User_Volume_Include * doesn't allow me to see
all dasd.
After I IPL VMTEST, I did 'ATT 163C TO VMTEST' from
The shares are normalized. The absolute shares are normalized to 99%
and the relative shares get the rest.
Hughes, Jim - OIT wrote:
What would be the effect if the sum of my SET SHARE ABS xx% is greater
than 100%??
Jim Hughes
603-271-5586
There's no sense in
In the second level system, do a Q DASD ALL and look at the results; Do
you see your disks there, and what is their state?
In the first level system, do a Q DASD label for the two disks in
question, and see what their state is there.
There has to be a reason that the disk isn't finding its way
Hello.
We are running z/VM 4.4 and since initial installation no problem arises.
This week, we started to receive following messages:
DTCUTI002E TCP/IP is low on TCBs. Of 256 blocks, 24 are free. You should
monitor this.
DTCUTI002E TCP/IP was very low on TCP connections. Of 341
Minidisks can only be created on volumes that are either CP_OWNED, either
ATTACHed to SYSTEM. An MDISK statement defining a minidisk on any other
volume will result in
HCPLNM108E KRIS 5193 not linked; volid VSHR02 not mounted
User_Voume_include is just an easy way to have DASDs attached to
Hello Ann,
I have been looking at your statements. Let me see if I have
this right.
You have a first level system that has two DASD 163C and 165F that you
want to make MDISKs on VMTEST.
MDISK 163C 3390 000 10017 LX163C MR
MDISK 165F 3390 000 3338 LX165F MR
But you get
Hi, listers,
I created a new logo, tested it on the 2nd level and
the new logo came up. So, Ipled the first level VM,
but the new logo does not come up, the file
Local logo on CF1 has new logo. CPLOAD is on CF1,
CPLOAD was accessed, but not local logo.
It looks like came up with minimum logo.
Carlos--I ran into that a few years ago. I'm running with:
ACBPOOLSIZE 1700
SCBPOOLSIZE 1700
TCBPOOLSIZE 2200
FIXEDPAGESTORAGEPOOL1500
These are sort of a SWAG. Altho I did have to go back and increase some
of them after the initial
Ann
Sorry
I meant to say that the terminal device is different between the second level
and the first level..
If you issue a Q CONS from the second level and the first level system are they
the save device type.
Another way of asking is how are you accessing the LOGO on each level.. TN3270,
I have been trying to use the CKDSVRST program from the IBM Downloads
webpage to write images of non-CMS minidisks to a tape and then restore
them. This program writes two files to the tape for each input minidisk.
The first file is a control record that provides some information about
what is
Thanks so much for your time and assistance. What you have provided me
was very helpful. Now time for me to tackle the VSE FTP Vendor
windmill... Thanks again.
Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114
-Original
I always FTP to the SFS. i.e. cd vmsysu:maint.
As far as ftping to the CP spool system.
This may be old, obsolete knowledge, but when I use to do it...
The FTP to the spool system was staged by the FTPSERV machine to one of it's
minidisk. Then, as a separate step (of the same process), it
On Friday, 06/22/2007 at 09:26 AST, Dodds, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Everything we have done so far works except the DIR command to
get a directory listing. So I am assuming that the LISTFORMAT UNIX for
VM FTP is possibly for that problem and maybe others. Is that because
FileZilla only
Good idea, there is one little problem though: CMS can be kille at two
places, and if it does, the EXEC will come to an end before the second level
VM is started.
The trick is to combine next 3 commands in one:
'TERMINAL CONMODE 3270'
'SET MACHINE ESA'
'IPL 711C CLEAR LOADPARM 0009'
should
cool
thanx
munson
Kris Buelens wrote:
Good idea, there is one little problem though: CMS can be kille at two
places, and if it does, the EXEC will come to an end before the second
level VM is started.
The trick is to combine next 3 commands in one:
'TERMINAL CONMODE 3270'
'SET MACHINE
On Friday, 06/22/2007 at 11:50 ZW3, Carlos Bodra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:
DTCUTI002E TCP/IP was very low on TCP connections. Of 285 blocks, 41 are
free
after 85 more allocated.
These messages occur with differences of some days. In TCPIP PROFILE
file we
have only
On Friday, 06/22/2007 at 11:38 EST, Tom Duerbusch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FTP to the spool system was staged by the FTPSERV machine to one of
it's
minidisk. Then, as a separate step (of the same process), it would
issue a
spool command and then the PRINT or PUNCH command. In other
We do something similar for TPF guests and have, under some
circumstances gotten the message, DMSCIT171T Permanent console error;
re-IPL CMS, before the other commands in the string completed. This has
been a source of confusion to our users who, by and large, are naive. By
doing something that
i know 4.4 was withdrawn last year, but can we run it on a z9 ?
we are contemplating bringing in a z9 to replace our z890.
prg
Phillip Gramly
Systems Programmer
Communications Data Group
Champaign, IL
We have run zVM 4.3 on a z9.
Daniel Allen
Sr. System Programmer
Serena Software, Inc.
13713 Pinto Lane
Lodi, CA 95240
800-457-3736 ext. 11241
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.serena.com http://www.serena.com/
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL
On 6/22/07, Bill Munson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually here is an easy way to ipl a 2nd level system
there are no DEDICATE statements in the Directory for VMTEST
Your approach requires that the 2nd level system has also class B.
While not as dangerous as class A, it will eventually bite
29 matches
Mail list logo
