On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Mahesh T. Pai wrote:
> narendra sisodiya said on Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 02:40:01PM +0530,:
>
> > > There is a utility ! for example, I am making a book Or software, and
> I
> > want that all the derivative work must be come under my copyright. for
> > example Mr A
narendra sisodiya said on Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 02:40:01PM +0530,:
> > There is a utility ! for example, I am making a book Or software, and I
> want that all the derivative work must be come under my copyright. for
> example Mr A will download my software (copyrighted by me) and will change
>
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mahesh T. Pai wrote:
> narendra sisodiya said on Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 02:07:00AM +0530,:
>
> > > If programmer A has made some software , it only has it copyright
> > notice and no license ! How i can use it ?
>
> If you have obtained a copy of the the sotware i
narendra sisodiya said on Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 02:07:00AM +0530,:
> > If programmer A has made some software , it only has it copyright
> notice and no license ! How i can use it ?
If you have obtained a copy of the the sotware in a legal way, you can
use it the way you want.
If the software w
> I have written a program which i want to deploy at my university.
> Therefore i want some help so that i can put my copyright on the program.
Is this just a copyright statement you want or a copy protection / DRM
mechanism?
You work (art) is copyrighted to you, be default. No special
manoe
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Mahesh T. Pai wrote:
> Nishant Prakash Kashyap said on Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 04:34:53AM +0530,:
>
> > I'm a non-veg, and fish is freely available in sea, then why does
> > fisherman sell me Fish and does not give it free of cost, afterall
> > he got it free, did
Nishant Prakash Kashyap said on Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 04:34:53AM +0530,:
> I'm a non-veg, and fish is freely available in sea, then why does
> fisherman sell me Fish and does not give it free of cost, afterall
> he got it free, did he cultivate it ?... why is the government not
> blocking them
On 3/4/10, Raj Mathur wrote:
> On Thursday 04 Mar 2010, Nishant Prakash Kashyap wrote:
>> So, the moral is that, if someone spends time to develop something,
>> he has the right to give it for free or attach a price tag to it.
>
> Those who advocate FOSS agree with you. You have the absolute rig
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 04:34:53 +0530
Nishant Prakash Kashyap wrote:
> Hi All,...
>
> If i invent a thing using air water and sunlight. that does
> not mean my product should be free as i got air water and
> sunlight free from the mother nature.
[Long rant snipped]
Please look up the difference
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:56 PM, A. Mani wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:18 PM, narendra sisodiya
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Raj Mathur wrote:
> >
> >> On Wednesday 03 Mar 2010, narendra sisodiya wrote:
> >> > No , this do not happen, You write a book, most publisher just pri
On Thursday 04 Mar 2010, Nishant Prakash Kashyap wrote:
> So, the moral is that, if someone spends time to develop something,
> he has the right to give it for free or attach a price tag to it.
Those who advocate FOSS agree with you. You have the absolute right to
do whatever you want with your
By putting a copyright statement i just want to tell the world that the
program is mine. By the way by making it a gpl2 licensed software, i am making
it opensource. Therefore how am i against the opensource movement?
___
Ilugd mailing list
Ilugd@li
Hi All,...
If i invent a thing using air water and sunlight. that does not mean my
product should be free as i got air water and sunlight free from the mother
nature. If i develop a software or modify a software initially developed by
someone, it is a intellectual property. The initiator may b
Hi,
--- On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:21 PM, kamal dave
wrote:
| ... intellectual property ... Intellectual Property
| ... Intellectual Property ... Intellectual Property ... intellectual
property.
\--
Never seen this so many times on a F/OSS mailing list. Nevertheless,
worth reading the following:
Re: [ilugd] Protecting my copyright
> To: "Raj Mathur"
> Cc: il...@frodo.hserus.net
> Date: Wednesday, March 3, 2010, 6:32 PM
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Raj
> Mathur
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Gora Mohanty
> wrote:
> >> Copyright
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Mahesh T. Pai wrote:
> narendra sisodiya said on Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 07:18:14PM +0530,:
>
> > there are 3-4 more book on next desk, everywhere you can find that
> > copyright (and thus full power) goes with publisher...
>
> Sir,
>
> Look at "ownership" or immove
narendra sisodiya said on Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 07:18:14PM +0530,:
> there are 3-4 more book on next desk, everywhere you can find that
> copyright (and thus full power) goes with publisher...
Sir,
Look at "ownership" or immoveable property - a piece of land, a
residential building, agricultur
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:18 PM, narendra sisodiya
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Raj Mathur wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 03 Mar 2010, narendra sisodiya wrote:
>> > No , this do not happen, You write a book, most publisher just print
>> > your name as author but copyright and license to dis
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Raj Mathur wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 Mar 2010, narendra sisodiya wrote:
>> No , this do not happen, You write a book, most publisher just print
>> your name as author but copyright and license to distribute is with
>> publisher. this is must like a IT company where
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Raj Mathur wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 Mar 2010, narendra sisodiya wrote:
> > No , this do not happen, You write a book, most publisher just print
> > your name as author but copyright and license to distribute is with
> > publisher. this is must like a IT company w
On Wednesday 03 Mar 2010, narendra sisodiya wrote:
> No , this do not happen, You write a book, most publisher just print
> your name as author but copyright and license to distribute is with
> publisher. this is must like a IT company where coder (labor) write
> code and it goes into company ac
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Raj Mathur wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
>> Copyright is entirely distinct from licensing. If I write a piece
>> of code, or acquire copyright over it by some other means, I can
>> choose to license it to whomever, under whatever cond
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Raj Mathur wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> > Copyright is entirely distinct from licensing. If I write a piece
> > of code, or acquire copyright over it by some other means, I can
> > choose to license it to whomever, under whatever
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:15:11 +0530
Raj Mathur wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Gora Mohanty
> wrote:
[...]
> > Legal eagles can chip in, but roughly speaking, copyright has
> > to do with ownership, while a licence has to do with what terms
> > and conditions that you allow other people t
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> Copyright is entirely distinct from licensing. If I write a piece
> of code, or acquire copyright over it by some other means, I can
> choose to license it to whomever, under whatever conditions I deem
> fit.
>
> Legal eagles can chip in, but r
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Zico wrote:
> [ ... ]
> Just wanna know, how come copyrighted piece of code follows GNU license?
You're right in a sense: the GNU project opposed copyright in
principle. However, copyright law is so widespread and ingrained into
society that Richard Stallman, the
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:16:39 +0600
Zico wrote:
[...]
> Just wanna know, how come *copyrighted *piece of code follows
> *GNU license?* *
[...]
Copyright is entirely distinct from licensing. If I write a piece
of code, or acquire copyright over it by some other means, I can
choose to license it to w
Zico said on Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:16:39PM +0600,:
> Just wanna know, how come *copyrighted *piece of code follows *GNU license?*
If you are hinting that GPL means no copyright, you are wrong.
Because the GNU GPL (General Public License) uses the law of copyright
to give you more rights that
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Raj Mathur wrote:
>
> Actually you would need to add both copyright and licence.
>
> Copyright is as simple as adding a line to each source file:
>
> Copyright (C) 2010, Your Name
>
> Licence is also pretty simple. If you choose the GPL, add this text
> near the
On Tuesday 02 Mar 2010, varunmitta...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have written a program which i want to deploy at my
> university. Therefore i want some help so that i can put my
> copyright on the program.
Actually you would need to add both copyright and licence.
Copyright is as simple as addi
Hello everybody,
I have written a program which i want to deploy at my university.
Therefore i want some help so that i can put my copyright on the program.
Varun Mittal
___
Ilugd mailing list
Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/
31 matches
Mail list logo
