Could you clarify the "false value returned"? What exactly are you
trying to achieve?
Jörn
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Nimrod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there a way that when using the remote method, a "false" value is
> being returned until the actual remote result is available.
>
Diego,
Thanks for the reply. I tried this idea but it threw up another
interesting problem. I was wondering if you could throw some light on
it.
When the validation plugin adds an error class, it does not remove it
once the form is validated. Therefore when I switch to the tab with
the error cla
Hi,
This is just an idea (which I haven't checked) but since you have JS
experience I'm just gonna throw it at you.
The validation plugin adds an 'error' class to all problem fields. You could
very quickly loop through each tab, look for an error and (if found), change
the focus to that tab. some
Please, does anyone knows why do I need to push twice the submit
button so the validation be updated?
Thanks,
Miguel
On Jun 25, 2:01 pm, shapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It worked but now I get a new problem which I also notice before! I
> though it was due to this but it seems it is
Try using String.search(regexp)+1 instead of regexp.test(String).
Are you getting legitimate values to fail, or invalid ones to pass?
On Jun 20, 7:48 pm, shapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very strange ... it works both ways ... well, what I mean is that I
> keep having the same problem in bot
Hi,
Sorry, I can't..
But if you copy and paste the exact code I have advised, and include
the requisite jQuery and validation JS, you can see locally the issue
that still baffles me.
Any help figuring out where I'm going wrong would be great, thanks.
On Jun 20, 3:17 am, "Jörn Zaefferer" <[EMAIL
I'm a bit confused - are you talking about a form reset button;
Or am I on the wrong track?
On Jun 22, 11:45 pm, shapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know that is possible to use a button with class "cancel" to be able
> to cancel and not validate.
> But can I define another class
Very strange ... it works both ways ... well, what I mean is that I
keep having the same problem in both cases.
Any more ideas?
Did anyone notice that the Validation Examples Forms that have Masking
don't work in Firefox 3?
Thanks,
Miguel
On Jun 20, 7:46 pm, "Brian J. Fink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
@Miguel: It appears you have the RegExp value and the value switched.
Maybe you meant:
$.validator.addMethod('sqldatetime', function (value) {
return value.test(/^(([0-9]{4})-([0-1][0-9])-([0-3][0-9])\s([0-1]
[0-9]|[2]
[0-3]):([0-5][0-9]):([0-5][0-9])|)$/);
}, 'Verifique a data e hora. Use o fo
Hi shapper, do you speak portugues?
Please contact me for Validate chat through by e-mail.
Thz.
On 20 jun, 07:53, shapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to validate and mask a text box that should contain a
> DateTime in the following format:
>
> -mm-dd hh:mm:ss
>
> T
Please post a testpage.
Jörn
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Lossed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi. I tried posting this to the plugin group days ago but it's not
> showing
> and I'm not sure if it's every going to show.
>
>
> My form disappears when the focus changes between form fields. He
Hi,
I just solved it using:
$.validator.addMethod('sqldatetime', function (value) {
return /^([0-9]{4})-([0-1][0-9])-([0-3][0-9])\s([0-1][0-9]|[2][0-3]):
([0-5][0-9]):([0-5][0-9])$/.test(value);
}, 'Check your date and time. Use the format -mm-dd hh:mm:ss');
I am not sure if this is the wa
Please, anyone?
Thank You,
Miguel
On Jun 18, 11:18 pm, shapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using masking and client validation in a form using:
>
> Validator Plugin
> -http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-validation/
>
> Masked Input Plugin -http://digitalbush.com
For unique email addresses, use the remote-method:
http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Validation/Methods/remote#url
A demo for that:
http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Validate#The_Remember_The_Milk_sign-up_form
For message display, take a look at available options:
http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Validat
The edit page has the remote-stuff commented out, the required
valition seems to work fine.
Going to
http://test.fibranet-services.com/fnb/phase1/contents/company_group_validate_name.asp?GroupName=b
gives me "True", which is not a valid response for the remote method.
As it says in the documenta
Hi,
Here is test page im working on. Validation of Group Name is still not
working.
http://test.fibranet-services.com/fnb/phase1/index.asp?p=co-grp
Thanks,
Nimrod
Please provide a testpage - code snippets don't help.
Jörn
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Nimrod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the help!
>
> I revised my code but still doesn't work. I know there's wrong in my
> code but I can't figure it out. Here is the revised code. I ho
Hi,
Thanks for the help!
I revised my code but still doesn't work. I know there's wrong in my
code but I can't figure it out. Here is the revised code. I hope you
can help me with this.
$().ready(function() {
var container = $('div.error-container');
// Validate the form when
Methods that you add via $.validator.addMethod have to run
synchronously, so using ajax in there doesn't work.
The remote method implements the necessary synchronization:
http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Validation/Methods/remote#url
An example for the "unique" remote validation is here:
http://jqu
Please consider this a bug in whatever plugin you find, and report it
accordingly. An explanation of the correct pattern is here:
http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Authoring#Custom_Alias_in_plugin_code
I fixed this for the validation plugin, please give the latest
revision a try or wait for the next
All fixed up. :-)
Thanks to Jorn for an awesome plugin!
Okay, problem #2 from the original post has been solved. I finally found
the .errors() function and was able to modify it to suit my purposes.
Any ideas on how to solve problem #1 would be much appreciated. :-)
Thanks,
Matt
I'm 99.9% certain that I have correctly deduced that the reason for the
continued addition of the error messages to the DOM is that the errorsFor:
function() [see below] is not finding the ones that have been added already.
errorsFor: function(element) {
> return this.errors().filter('p[id="e
Please update to jQuery 1.2.6, the issue causing the validation plugin
to fail is fixed there.
Jörn
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 1:56 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My system it's working with jQuery 1.2.3 and has the validation Plugin
> with the latest version , but When I changed the jquery to
You can use the php file provided in the download (within
demo/marekto) as a reference to get the parameter and return the
result. I can't help you with actually implementing the check, which
most likely needs to select something from a database to check if the
address already exists. There are pl
Jacky schrieb:
I see... the group's key is not related to the rules/method.
So the group would force the underlying fields to only display one
message?
This would be a problem because a field would also have its own
message (like date format is incorrect). I tried my old demo,
inputting all
Jacky See schrieb:
[...]
Any better way to do this?
Or I should not use validation plugin under this situation?
The plugin is certainly not the best fit for this kind of validation.
You could try to implement your own plugin, reusing parts of the
validation plugin, especially validation me
I see... the group's key is not related to the rules/method.
So the group would force the underlying fields to only display one message?
This would be a problem because a field would also have its own message
(like date format is incorrect). I tried my old demo, inputting all four
fields with wron
Jacky schrieb:
I'm thinking if I can do this:
rules:{
planFromDate: {dateRange:'plan'}, planToDate: {dateRange:'plan'}
actualFromDate: {dateRange:'actual'}, actualToDate:
{dateRange:'actual'}
}
groups: {
dateRange: "planFromDate planToDate actualFromDate actualToDate"
}
$.validat
I'm thinking if I can do this:
rules:{
planFromDate: {dateRange:'plan'}, planToDate: {dateRange:'plan'}
actualFromDate: {dateRange:'actual'}, actualToDate: {dateRange:'actual'}
}
groups: {
dateRange: "planFromDate planToDate actualFromDate actualToDate"
}
$.validator.addMethod('dateRa
Jacky See schrieb:
I have put up a page to test.
http://www.seezone.net/dev/dateValiation.html
I need to use different method for different group of dates.
In that case, a global dateRange method seems not possible?
Thats a different issue. A better dateRange implementation could reuse
the
HatemJaber schrieb:
I am using the Validation plugin from http://jquery.bassistance.de/validate/demo
which is a great plugin. I just found out after browsing the docs some
more that it has the capability of dynamically adding a row of data. I
would like to know how I can remove a row of data. Af
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Jacky See <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have put up a page to test.
> http://www.seezone.net/dev/dateValiation.html
Link should be: http://www.seezone.net/dev/dateValidation.html
--
Aaron Heimlich
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com
I have put up a page to test.
http://www.seezone.net/dev/dateValiation.html
I need to use different method for different group of dates.
In that case, a global dateRange method seems not possible?
On 4月11日, 上午6時03分, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jacky See schrieb:> Hi,
>
> > Some q
Jacky See schrieb:
Hi,
Some question on the config of validation plugins.
Suppose there are #fromDate and #toDate fields (using ui.datepicker).
I have added these custom rules
[...]
It will output two messages of 'Please input correct date range'.
How can I make it only ouput single one?
I'
Interestingly, Aptana doesn't seem to think that there is a error
there either. I guess it's because of the fact that aptana is using
firefox 3 as the javascript engine. Is this no longer and error in the
new version of javascript included in firefox, or is it a bug in
firefox?
On Mar 25, 2:10 pm
Jacky schrieb:
Hi all, some question about the validation plugins.
There is a form with:
- some search fields
- a table of search result with checkboxes
- some buttons to do next action with checked records
Currently, the form is placing error message after each search fields.
However, I also
Ariel schrieb:
OK nevermind. after taking a break for a while and coming back, i
immediately found the exra comma in there. although, in my defense,
neither firebug nor webdeveloper toolbar fond the syntax error either.
I highly recommend a syntax-checking editor. Helps completely avoiding
t
kozEfx schrieb:
This post is about the Validation plugin (http://bassistance.de/jquery-
plugins/jquery-plugin-validation/).
It seems that validation occurs on all fields initially, pre-submit,
but not all show error state if field data is cleared.
Test case:
goto: http://jquery.bassistance.de
OK nevermind. after taking a break for a while and coming back, i
immediately found the exra comma in there. although, in my defense,
neither firebug nor webdeveloper toolbar fond the syntax error either.
On Mar 23, 10:54 pm, Ariel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a form set up with the validat
"Validate elements (except checkboxes/radio buttons) on blur. If
nothing is entered, all rules are skipped, except when the field was
already marked as invalid."
I want $.validate() to validate my form element on blur, so I set
onfocusout to true. Althought it says by default it is set to true,
henry schrieb:
jquery: 1.2.3
jquery validation plugin: 1.2.1
I have:
...
$().ready(){
$("#myform").validate({onfocusout:true});
}
firebug error message >>>
validator.settings["on" + event.type].call is not a function
on jquery.validate.js line 250
same error msg is thrown with onk
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Chris Jordan schrieb:
Just some clarification on what I'm trying to achieve. I'm looking at
the "error container" example for the validation plug-in and that's
darn close to what I want, but I was hoping for the error container to
be more like a modal dialog. Is there a w
Chris Jordan schrieb:
Just some clarification on what I'm trying to achieve. I'm looking at
the "error container" example for the validation plug-in and that's
darn close to what I want, but I was hoping for the error container to
be more like a modal dialog. Is there a way of placing these erro
Just some clarification on what I'm trying to achieve. I'm looking at
the "error container" example for the validation plug-in and that's
darn close to what I want, but I was hoping for the error container to
be more like a modal dialog. Is there a way of placing these error
messages inside of a m
Thanks, Jorn...
I'll put the test page online soon.
Rick
> -Original Message-
> From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jörn
> Zaefferer
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 5:17 PM
> To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [jQue
serge.cp schrieb:
Hi!
One of test from demos named "Validating a form with a radio and
checkbox buttons" behave strange from my point of view.
Checkboxes group
Spam
Spam via E-Mail
Spam via Phone
Spam via Mail
show error message "Please select at least two types of spam.", if
none or only on
Great. Thanks.
[subliminal message] Spinner! Spinner! [/subliminal message]
On Feb 4, 2008 5:36 PM, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rus Miller schrieb:
> > Yep. You got it. Thanks for great work!
> >
> > Is a spinner coming anytime soon?
> >
> Not in the 1.2.1 release, I don'
Rus Miller schrieb:
Yep. You got it. Thanks for great work!
Is a spinner coming anytime soon?
Not in the 1.2.1 release, I don't yet have a schedule for further
releases. I'll keep it in mind.
And by the way, 1.2.1 bundles both the delegate plugin and the necessary
part of the ajaxQueue
Eridius schrieb:
I think I found a bug in the validation 1.2 or ui datepicker plug-in. I also
have the ui datepicker attacked to two of the form elements. Now when I try
to validation a form and the fields that are calendars are not fielded in,
the calendar popped up for the first calendar ele
Yep. You got it. Thanks for great work!
Is a spinner coming anytime soon?
On Feb 4, 12:50 pm, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rus Miller schrieb:> [...]
> > I moved up to your latest release and the issue of validating an empty
> > field is still there.
>
> >http://monovisiondesign
Rus Miller schrieb:
[...]
I moved up to your latest release and the issue of validating an empty
field is still there.
http://monovisiondesign.com/client/jquery/validate-url/form.php
Thanks for the testcase! I've missed a small change in the remote
method, its now fixed: http://dev.jquery.c
Dave Stewart schrieb:
Jorn,
I've done some work on selectors for groups, and it's actually quite
easy to select a group or sub group for validation, although I don't
know the details of your implementation, so I wont suppose to imply
anything.
As usual I've uploaded some demo code for you to ta
Jorn,
I've done some work on selectors for groups, and it's actually quite
easy to select a group or sub group for validation, although I don't
know the details of your implementation, so I wont suppose to imply
anything.
As usual I've uploaded some demo code for you to take a look.
www.
Rus Miller schrieb:
http://monovisiondesign.com/client/jquery/validate-url/form.php
On Feb 1, 4:49 pm, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Rus,
could you post a demo/testpage with that code? That makes it easier to
see the modifications in context.
Thanks
Jörn
Thanks, I'll
http://monovisiondesign.com/client/jquery/validate-url/form.php
On Feb 1, 4:49 pm, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Rus,
>
> could you post a demo/testpage with that code? That makes it easier to
> see the modifications in context.
>
> Thanks
> Jörn
Dave Stewart schrieb:
Jorn,
Here is a live example.
http://www.janepatrick.co.uk/admin/test/associative.php
Hopefully it's in your interest to examine this issue further!
Thanks, I'll definitely take a look, though it won't make it into 1.2.1.
Jörn
Jorn,
Here is a live example.
http://www.janepatrick.co.uk/admin/test/associative.php
Hopefully it's in your interest to examine this issue further!
Many thanks,
dave
Hi Rus,
could you post a demo/testpage with that code? That makes it easier to
see the modifications in context.
Thanks
Jörn
Rus Miller schrieb:
2. Prevent validation on a field with validation rule, but which is
optional and empty.
I'll be fixing that for 1.2.1. If everything goes well, I'll release it
later today.
Jörn
Rus Miller schrieb:
Also, I noticed that even though the 'Check URL' field on my form
(http://monovisiondesign.com/client/jquery/validate-url/form.php) is
not required, it still performs a remote call and a label.checked is
applied to the field when it's left empty. Am I doing something wrong
o
My issue is that remote requests, especially those involving an
external server, can take a second or two. It's nice to give the
user an indication that something is happening, which is why a spinner
isn't 'useless'. It would be great if someone could give me a push in
the right direction.
Als
Rus Miller schrieb:
There is a label.error and a label.checked but does anyone know how I
would display a label.pending (perhaps with a spinner) while the
validation (especially a remote request) is happening?
Thanks.
You can still use jQuery's ajax events to display a busy-indicator:
http:
I made a small discovery (in my sleep no less!) that works in HTML,
but screws up the PHP:
HTML:
If I put the array properties in single quotes (the spaces are to make
it clearer), the controls are validated as a group! This is good.
PHP:
However, the PHP also receives those single quotes, so
Hi, I have fixed this.
niceforms.js: (~ line 482)
jQuery(txtRight)
.attr({src:jQuery.NiceJForms.options.imagesPath + "input_right.gif"})
/*
6epcepk's hack
[nice forms + ]
set right image id
*/
.attr({id:"n-f-r-i-" +
Tristan schrieb:
Hi,
I'm trying to create a new custom validation method similar to the
other methods included in 'additional-methods.js'. I've created my
method like this:
jQuery.validator.addMethod('dateAfter', function(value, element,
param) {
var dVal = new Date();
var dPara
Thanks for catching that. The docs for the validation plugin are
currently being moved from the source code to the wiki and there has
also been some re-organization for the upcoming release of v1.2, so
the docs may be out of sync with the code for a few more days. We'll
make sure to get these li
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jörn
> Zaefferer
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 4:14 PM
> To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [jQuery] Re: Validation Plug-in Problem
>
>
> You've just got a typo. Its $("#MC_form").
>
> Jörn
Javascript is case-sensitive, so $("#MC_form") != $("#MC_Form").
-- Josh
- Original Message -
From: "Jörn Zaefferer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 1:13 PM
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Validation Plug-in Problem
You've just got a typo. Its $("#MC_form").
Jörn
You've just got a typo. Its $("#MC_form").
Jörn
d the help, Jorn...
Rick
> -Original Message-
> From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jörn
> Zaefferer
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 1:57 PM
> To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [jQuery] Re: Validation Plug-in Problem
>
Hi Rick,
$("#MC_Form") returns nothing. Thats why the validation doesn't work.
Jörn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi Guy,
i solved the 2 matters:
1) The validation in IE6 is solved by the new 1.2 version. I found
that in the jorn repository files.
2) maybe I lost something but i was using an old metadata plugin but i
really did not see in any place a notice for a new release.
I
Hi Guy,
i solved the 2 matters:
1) The validation in IE6 is solved by the new 1.2 version. I found
that in the jorn repository files.
2) maybe I lost something but i was using an old metadata plugin but i
really did not see in any place a notice for a new release.
Installing the new one ( the o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am trying with validator 1.2 and metadata and I get an issue in all
> the browsers :
>
> jQuery(element).metadata is not a function
>
> Any help??
>
I'm guessing the plugin is assuming that you have the metadata plugin
installed and borks when it's missing. That be
I am trying with validator 1.2 and metadata and I get an issue in all
the browsers :
jQuery(element).metadata is not a function
Any help??
andrea
On Dec 7, 12:52 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am using the validation and forms plgin together like that:
>
>
> $(document
Rick Faircloth schrieb:
Why would the same validation routine work well on one page
and then when applied to another site not return the validation?
The params are attached to the URL… it’s not like that on the first
site where the validation is working.
Quick ideas, anyone, without first
Thanks Jörn. I already do this to validate 2 required fields with different
values between. I'll try...
Cheers
2007/11/28, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Web Specialist schrieb:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I have to validate a form with required fields. Super easy with Jorn's
> > Form Validatio
Web Specialist schrieb:
Hi all
I have to validate a form with required fields. Super easy with Jorn's
Form Validation Plugin. But how to avoid user to insert number 0(zero)
in that fields?
You can write your own validation methods:
http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Validation/Validator/addMetho
jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Validation rule for Joerns' Plug-in...
Sorry.
Choose a category
< option value="2">Automotive
Medical
2007/10/27, Web Specialist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Rick
I'm using Jorn's Form Validation p
Sorry.
Choose a category
< option value="2">Automotive
Medical
2007/10/27, Web Specialist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Rick
>
> I'm using Jorn's Form Validation plugin and this approach works fine:
>
> validate="required:true">
> Choose a category
> < option value="">Automotive
> Medical
>
>
>
Rick
I'm using Jorn's Form Validation plugin and this approach works fine:
Choose a category
Automotive
Medical
Cheers
Marco Antonio
2007/10/27, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi, all…
>
> Quesiton:
>
> How to validate the selection for a drop-down select input?
>
> If choices are:
>
I´ll take a look , thanks Marco
On Oct 25, 1:27 pm, "Web Specialist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jorn's Form Validation could be this job with related option. Please look
> example page:
>
> http://jquery.bassistance.de/validate/demo-test/
>
> and you could see relation between "I'd like to rece
Jorn's Form Validation could be this job with related option. Please look
example page:
http://jquery.bassistance.de/validate/demo-test/
and you could see relation between "I'd like to receive..." and "Topics".
Source code:
topic: {
required: "#newsletter:checked",
minLength: 2
},
Cheers
Marco A
Alexander Graef schrieb:
Hi,
thanks :) How would I reference the name for the rule and message
preferences ?
Using test[] would break the javascript, can I use 'test[]' as the key
value?
Sure, this is legal javascript:
rules: {
'test[]': "required"
}
-- Jörn
opment
http://dev.portalzine.de
pro. portalZINE® - customized experience
http://pro.portalzine.de
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alexander Graef
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 7:52 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re
TECTED] On
Behalf Of Jörn Zaefferer
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 6:26 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: validation plugin: validation of checkboxes fail
Alexander Graef schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> For the multi select:
>
> one
> two
>
Alexander Graef schrieb:
Hi,
For the multi select:
one
two
three
four
five
This allows you to pass the selected items via a form post and receive them
as an array.
Same applies for the checkboxes:
Steak:
Pizza:
Chicken:
If your serverside prefers
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jörn Zaefferer
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 8:30 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: validation plugin: validation of checkboxes fail
Alexander Graef schrieb:
> [...]
> This is a wrong scenario, as normally each checkbox has its own uniqu
Alexander Graef schrieb:
I am using the validation plugin and I can not get multi-selects
working. As soon as I send the multi select as an array, validation
fails or does not trigger.
Can you give me an example for "multi select as an array"?
-- Jörn
Alexander Graef schrieb:
[...]
This is a wrong scenario, as normally each checkbox has its own unique name
within a form. The validation fails if the names are different for each
checkbox. How do I chain them for validation with each checkbox having its own
name ?
[...]
I have no idea how t
Nope, that wasn't included. I see the point though.
Does it make more sense to run that before displaying error messages, or
afterwards? How to name it? beforeErrorDisplay? afterValidation?
beforeFailure?
Either before or after would be fine I think. The reason is that you might
want to d
Josh Nathanson schrieb:
- onsubmit: Boolean, default true - validate on form submit (similar
to onkeyup/onblur)
- beforeValidation: Callback, called before doing any validation
- beforeSubmit: Callback, called before submitting the form (default
submit or calling submitHandler, if specified)
- onsubmit: Boolean, default true - validate on form submit (similar to
onkeyup/onblur)
- beforeValidation: Callback, called before doing any validation
- beforeSubmit: Callback, called before submitting the form (default
submit or calling submitHandler, if specified)
I'm not sure yet if bef
Steve Blades schrieb:
Whoops! One last thing. An 'onValidationFailure' type of method,
allowing someone to run some scripting should the validation fail
(like resetting data changes one might have made in the beforeSubmit
call). You may even want to split things further, with a
'beforeValidat
Whoops! One last thing. An 'onValidationFailure' type of method, allowing
someone to run some scripting should the validation fail (like resetting
data changes one might have made in the beforeSubmit call). You may even
want to split things further, with a 'beforeValidation' (occurring prior to
val
> How about these?
> - beforeSubmit: called before the validation starts
> - success: called when the form is valid
> - submitHandler: replaces the default submit, handler must do an
> ajaxSubmit or whatever
Sounds outstanding, as long as the submitHandler only covered an ajaxSubmit.
If it was an
n".
-- Josh
- Original Message -
From: "wattaka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "jQuery (English)"
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 6:11 AM
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Validation plugin errors on IE6
Hi Jörn,
The valide.js works, the validate pack does not, same err
Hi Jörn,
The valide.js works, the validate pack does not, same error as before.
Thanks. Just let me know, I´ll be glad to test.
On Oct 6, 12:41 pm, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wattaka schrieb:> This is just plain infuriating, this piece code works
> perfectly well
> > on FF 2,
wattaka schrieb:
This is just plain infuriating, this piece code works perfectly well
on FF 2, on IE6 , it just causes errors:
[...]
Does anyone have any ideas?
Could you please give the latest revision a try?
http://dev.jquery.com/view/trunk/plugins/validate/
I haven't managed to just rele
201 - 300 of 394 matches
Mail list logo
