Looks like you are missing "virtual-link-local-address".
-Jonas
Am 2022-01-25 20:51, schrieb Chris Adams via juniper-nsp:
I'm trying to add VRRP for IPv6 to a pair of MX150s (that are already
running VRRP for IPv4). I've switched from VRRPv2 to VRRPv3, and the
v4
VRR
5.1R6 this release
wouldnt support it and jumping to 17.4R2 would
cause the MPC reboot.
-Jonas
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
for the RE it can keep up with current line modular RE's for the MX240.
-Jonas
Am Freitag, den 08.11.2019, 11:39 -0500 schrieb Clarke Morledge:
> I wanted to resurrect an old thread about the MX204, from a year and a
> half ago:
>
> https://lists.gt.net/nsp/juniper/64290
>
&
Hello,
for the minimum you will need to upgrade:
FFANTRAY-MX480-HC-S (high capacity fan tray to run MPC cards due to cooling)
MX-SCBE (req'd for MPC3+ cards)
as for line cards i'd suggest using MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP, they are cheap
used/refurb. If you are
running 3+ of these you might need to upgra
Chris,
the -F00 have a tachometer signal, so the device using it can read the
RPM easily.
The -R00 utilize a locking signal which only tells the device if the
rotor does spin freely or is locked (in which case the device can shut
down power to the fan to prevent any issues).
As you would imagine
sert that stick
into the faulty SRX and force it to boot from there.
Am Sonntag, den 11.11.2018, 14:43 +0200 schrieb Mohammad Khalil:
> Ops , but it did not work either
> Nand format failed
>
> BR,
> Mohammad
>
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 at 14:46, Jonas Frey
> wrote:
> &g
Hi Mohammad,
thats a typo, its nand_format (note the underscore).
Am Sonntag, den 11.11.2018, 05:31 -0500 schrieb Mohammad Khalil:
> => reset
>
>
> U-Boot 1.1.6-JNPR-2.7 (Build time: Nov 26 2013 - 19:04:49)
>
> Initializing memory this may take some time...
> Measured DDR clock 266.62 MHz
> SRX
t&id=KB6660&actp=MET
ADATA
-Jonas
Am Donnerstag, den 05.04.2018, 09:34 -0500 schrieb Aaron Gould:
> Thanks Rob, Is a break followed by c within 5 seconds a documented
> way to
> crash a RE-S-X6-64G ?
>
> Btw, Jtac couldn't find the dump
>
> Rma'ing RE ... said b
Hello,
i am getting the following notice in the logs:
Mar 1 13:58:07 fpc0 CMIC(0/3): VSC8248 cmic-vsc8248-0/0/7 is running
out-of-date firmware version 2.52 (0x234). Please upgrade firmware to
version 2.53 (0x235) or later.
Does anyone know howto update these?
-Jonas
signature.asc
Hi Daniel,
thanks for this hint, i'll give it a try!
(However would be pleased if juniper could just update the tcp-options
stanca to include ECN/CWR).
Br,
Jonas
Am Freitag, den 27.11.2015, 18:48 +0100 schrieb Daniel Verlouw:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Jon
traffic?
It seems even with MS-MIC this is not possible.
I am asking since we are seeing new types of dDos attacks using SYN
traffic with ECN and CWR bit set (however with a non-zero ACK window).
Br,
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Most 3rd party vendor's lock down the A0 part of the SFP+, so you cant
change values there. Try asking your vendor if they can provide A0
unlocked SFP+...usually they will be a bit more expensive. If they dont
want to offer them just choose another supplier...there are plenty.
Having a SFP+ EEPROM
Dave,
as far as i know starting from PREMIUM2 the chassis also comes with the
high capacity fan module.
Am Dienstag, den 20.05.2014, 16:32 + schrieb Dave Peters - Terabit
Systems:
> Hi all--
>
> I think I've got this nailed down, but I wanted to make sure I know the
> differences among the
USB Device(s) found
scanning bus for storage devices... 1 Storage Device(s) found
One the front panel LCD it reads: "POST Eth pass.."
Anyone have any idea howto fix this?
BR,
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
+1 for the "all" requirement
Am Mittwoch, den 26.02.2014, 10:36 -0500 schrieb Phil Shafer:
> Juniper users,
>
> We've been asked to make a change the "clear bgp neighbor" command
> to make the neighbor or "all" argument mandatory. The root cause
> is the severe impact of "clear bgp neighbor" and
Hi,
sorry, i mixed this up with a diff vendor.
The VC cable on the EX series is a external pci-e x8 cable.
See: http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/EX4200
Am Montag, den 10.02.2014, 09:44 -0800 schrieb Yucong Sun:
> Hi,
>
> VCP cable for EX switch looks a lot like a plain SFF-8088 cable, can
>
Hi,
it is one indeed. If you look closer at those shipped from juniper you
can see its a normal SFF-8088. I doubt they have modified/coded anything
to prevent the use of other brands.
Am Montag, den 10.02.2014, 09:44 -0800 schrieb Yucong Sun:
> Hi,
>
> VCP cable for EX switch looks a lot like a
RE-S-1800 is running JunOS 64, so this will *not* work.
Mixing routing engines isnt recommended/supported officially by juniper
either, but works to some degree (RE1300/RE2000 32bit).
Am Mittwoch, den 08.01.2014, 19:43 +0800 schrieb Xuhu:
> OS version will be the same or not, official document
Hi,
unfortunatly there is none. You have to remove the disk/SSD and install
it in a regular system to read its smart data. You cant do this from
JunOS, as you cant execute unsigned binarys.
Am Dienstag, den 07.01.2014, 15:20 -0800 schrieb snort bsd:
> hi all:
>
> there is smartd running on jun
; it will easily be 400W or more. Around 100W for a base, idle unit with
> a few optics sounds right. Each optic module draws several watts
> depending on the type.
>
> On Oct 23, 2013 10:25 AM, "Jonas Frey (Probe Networks)"
> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
ve been able to find various values on non-juniper related sites which
range from 175W to 345W.
Best regards,
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://
works i'd
like to hear about it.
-Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Yes, just make sure to use a 2,5" drive.
SSD is fine, too.
http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Replacing_the_harddisk_with_solid_state_flash
Am Mittwoch, den 17.07.2013, 09:42 -1000 schrieb Antonio Querubin:
> I have a Juniper M5 whose hard drive just failed. The drive appears to be
> a Fuji
, 17:42 +0100 schrieb Tobias Heister:
> Hi,
>
> Am 08.03.2013 16:33, schrieb Jonas Frey (Probe Networks):
> > did anyone ever notice problems with wrong/changed SNMP ifIndex settings
> > after ISSU?
> > We ISSU upgraded a MX from 10.4R9.2 to 11.4R7.5 and after this some
ght? The workaround for EX doesnt help as
there is no such process to restart on MX series.
Best regards,
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
ht
Sunil,
those are ordering codes from Juniper. The hardware is exactly the same
so you can mix them.
RE-400-768-BB = Base bundle (included in chassis order)
RE-400-768-R = Redundant module (can be ordered same time with chassis)
RE-400-768-S = Spare (to be ordered later to upgrade to redundancy)
Hello,
Whats kind of CPU do Juniper use in RE-S-2000-4096 and RE-S-1800x2-8G ?
/Jonas
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
r.
But i dont see any reason to pay $1500 each time for a 10G SFP+ LR optic
when i can buy this from one of the larger SFP vendors for less than
$80.
-Jonas
Am Donnerstag, den 23.02.2012, 08:27 -0800 schrieb Bill Blackford:
> heh,
>
> ok, I shouldn't post something I'
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012, Jonas Björklund wrote:
I want all networks learned from BGP (even those from OSPF) pass the policy.
advertise-inactive on bgp group seem to be the magic. :-)
/Jonas___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
OSPF *AND* BGP was not able to pass the policy.
Only those which was learned from BGP.
I want all networks learned from BGP (even those from OSPF) pass the policy.
Any ideas?
/Jonas
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
PR718485:
Workaround:
Disable the "then log" or "then syslog" in firewall configuration.
Am Mittwoch, den 15.02.2012, 12:28 +0100 schrieb Per Randrup Nielsen:
> PR718485
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
juniper-ns
accept OSPF and BGP.
I dont want to allow BGP on ge-1/0/0. This should be done at lo0.
But If I accept BGP on ge-1/0/0, I also need to accept it on lo0 to get it to
work.
Is it possible to have different rules for incomning interface and lo0?
/Jonas
ssh":
[edit firewall family inet filter admin-access]
user@host# show
term ssh-access {
from {
source-address {
10.1.2.0/24;
}
protocol tcp;
destination-port ssh;
}
then accept;
}
Thanks! source-address solved the problem.
/Jonas
_
;
}
term ospf {
from {
protocol ospf;
}
then accept;
}
term deny {
then {
reject;
}
}
}
}
}
Any ideas?
/Jonas
Chuck,
its not listed on the supported PICs. There are only sonet PIC's listed
(not even ethernet ones) so i guess it will very likely not work. I
guess your only option is to go with the MS-DPC.
Am Dienstag, den 24.01.2012, 17:47 -0500 schrieb Chuck Anderson:
> Is it possible to reuse a Type2 M
jumper the SSD to slave and re-install JunOS via a PCMCIA card.
Best regards,
Jonas Frey
Am Montag, den 16.01.2012, 15:51 +0100 schrieb Juniper GOWEX:
> Hi all,
>
> We have disk errors again. We bought a SSD ( TS8GSSD25-S ) to replace
> the HDD with problems. If we connect the SS
DPCE- cards will go EOL soon.
You probably also mixed up DPC-S and DPCE-X, which is the layer2 card.
Best regards,
Jonas
Am Montag, den 12.12.2011, 11:42 -0500 schrieb Keegan Holley:
> You can find the details on the juniper website. Off the top of my head I
> know there are fewer queues a
Hi Nico,
which JunOS are you running? 10.4R7.5 here.
Maybe they changed it on later MX5/10/40 bundles or its now beeing
enforced on newer JunOS versions (just as i said)...
Best regards,
Jonas
Am Samstag, den 19.11.2011, 18:46 +0100 schrieb Nicolaj Kamensek:
> Am 19.11.2011 17:52, schr
Hello,
> Hi all,
>
>these codes are basically the same, both are MX80 based devices with a
> MIC 1x20GE (all mics are commercially called 3D, no difference here)
> already installed in one of the two available slots. On MX5 (and in the
> commercial bundle MX80-5) the 20x1G MIC is the only ca
classified for "enhanced" 24x7 operation.
Anyway...if i was about to replace a hdd on a routing engine i would
only use a SSD nowadays.
Best regards,
Jonas Frey
Am Freitag, den 18.11.2011, 15:17 +0100 schrieb Juniper GOWEX:
> Dear Jonas,
>
>
> Two weeks a
s you know maintenance usually causes service impact for customers and
(if possible) most networks like to avoid unneccessary downtimes.
Additionally alot of folks like to test new software in a lab
environment first so a simple update to a new JunOS version can
sometimes be quite complex and cost intensiv
longer than usual but thats
it.
Jonas
Am Mittwoch, den 19.10.2011, 20:14 +0100 schrieb juni...@iber-x.com:
> Hi experts,
>
> Thanks for your replies and advices.
>
> Just a quick question, as we have an old M5 and M10, we were wondering
> if we could replace directly the HDD
Hello,
havent you changed the HDD yet? Like to live dangerously eh? :-)
This is very likely related because those errors messages causes writes
to the HDDand if your HDD is dead/has bad sectors that will cause
trouble.
Good luck,
Jonas
Am Mittwoch, den 19.10.2011, 16:19 +0200 schrieb
Hello Ivan,
as Humair already pointed out you need to have encapsulation vlan-bridge
and vlan-ccc on one of each of the lt- interfaces.
Best regards,
Jonas
Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2011, 22:20 +0300 schrieb Ivan Ivanov:
> Hello Jonas,
>
>
> Could you share with us working c
My guess is that this is some error on the i2c bus with the fans.
Try rebooting the whole unit to see if the error persists.
Its very unlikely that all 4 fans of a fantray fail totally.
If you have a spare unit try the fantrays in that one to see if it is
really related to the chassis.
-Jonas
To whomever opened a PR about this:
It has been posted on the amsix mailing list that juniper also needs to
change internal addressing because of the issue with 128.0.0.0/16 as
addresses of this space are used internally within JunOS (see below).
Please add this to the PR so it gets fixed.
re0>
.
This measn first upgrade RE0 with the install media and then RE1 (by
putting the install-media into RE1 and connecting the console cable to
RE1).
-Jonas
Am Mittwoch, den 28.09.2011, 23:24 +0300 schrieb Jake Jake:
> I do have 2 spare 256MB drams which would meet the requirement. But in
> most
se is probably just a few dollars...
512MB sticks only work on the RE-5+ aka RE-850.
As for the upgrade: Get yourself a install media (or create one) and
save yourself the trouble of going via various intermediate versions
(also this would be alot faster).
-Jonas
Am Mittwoch, den 28.09.2011,
the RE.
Make sure to save your config files (JunOS config, SSH keys, other data
like home directorys, logs etc) before you replace the HDD if
neccessary.
Best regards,
Jonas
Am Mittwoch, den 21.09.2011, 17:18 +0200 schrieb Isidoro Cristobal:
> Hi,
>
> First of all thank you very much
/Replacing_the_harddisk_with_solid_state_flash
Best regards,
Jonas
Am Dienstag, den 20.09.2011, 17:09 +0200 schrieb Juniper GOWEX:
> Hi all,
>
> From yesterday at the log of my M20 are the following message :
>
> smartd[2595]: Device: /dev/ad1a, Failed attribute: (200)Write
> Er
Hello,
i can confirm that several CWDM SFP's from different vendors work fine
with the MX-series. They will show up as unknown vendor as its been said
alreadyunless you reprogramm these to return juniper part numbers
(if you've got a SFP eeprom programmer).
-
Jonas
Am Fr
16Gbps half-duplex CFEB-E, 4Gbps per FPC
Anyway you always have only 1 Gbps per PIC towards the backplane
regardless of how many GE ports that PIC actually has.
Jonas
Am Dienstag, den 30.08.2011, 02:00 +0400 schrieb Nick Kritsky:
> Hi all,
>
> From the Juniper documentation I know that
cant damage anythingeither it
works or not.
Jonas
Am Freitag, den 26.08.2011, 01:39 -0400 schrieb Jeff Wheeler:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Mario Andres Rueda Jaimes
> wrote:
> > I'm trying to install a 8GB SSD in a RE-600 with compact flash of 2G but
> >
> >
of growing IPv6 route tables as well as large (multiple)
VRF/IPv4 tables.
Am Donnerstag, den 25.08.2011, 19:13 -0700 schrieb Joel jaeggli:
> On 8/25/11 17:56 , Jonas Frey (Probe Networks) wrote:
> > Thats not completely accurate, for example the Intel Atom D525 does run
> > 64bit co
Thats not completely accurate, for example the Intel Atom D525 does run
64bit code.
> There are plenty of machines that do. virtually every intel system since
> the pentium pro (except the atom) has the hardware if not the bios
> support for doing so, that's not germain to the question of whethe
rious capture devices (i.e. if you have one for v4 and one for v6).
Best Regards,
Jonas
Am Donnerstag, den 18.08.2011, 16:08 -0700 schrieb Matt Hite:
> Bizarre. So you define the family type you want to sample by
> specifying it as the family type on the output stanza? (Seems
> backwards
Woops,
forgot something. Input also changed and should be now:
sampling {
input {
rate 100;
}
(no longer using family...)
Am Freitag, den 19.08.2011, 00:51 +0200 schrieb Jonas Frey (Probe
Networks):
> Matt,
>
> yes the config changed in JunOS 10.x.
>
to sample (this way you can also separate v4/v6
sampling).
Best regards,
Jonas
Am Donnerstag, den 18.08.2011, 15:33 -0700 schrieb Matt Hite:
> Thanks to Jeff Richmond and Jonas Frey who were kind enough to provide
> guidance both on and off-list.
>
> This is what I ended up with
quot; statement only samples and will continue
processing your firewall rules as normal.
As for the global config at forwarding-options: I havent tried this. I
like to have this only running on interfaces i configure the filter
on...much more precise.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best
regards,
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
correctly
configure this (probably because its pretty new).
Best regards,
Jonas
Am Donnerstag, den 18.08.2011, 07:37 -0500 schrieb OBrien, Will:
> To implement tagged interfaces with bridge domains, I use irb interfaces.
> This is directly from my production box with a little scrubbing.
>
&
-domains testbridge
domain-type bridge;
vlan-id 20;
What i need to do is to get the VLAN 20 working locally on the bridge
(various ports) as well as getting it connected to a somewhat pseudo
interface to attached it as a l2circuit.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards,
Jonas Frey
) because
bridge mode prohibits that.
How can i get this to work?
Best regards,
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper
Hello,
i see that there now is a new enhanced SCB for MX series which is
SCBE-MX-R. However i havent been able to find any information on this
regarding enhancements/features. Does anyone have any details?
Best regards,
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
etc). Some time ago i had posted regarding this on the
list...if you are interessted just search the archive.
We do still run some M20's and we upgraded all of them to 128MB (except
those running SSB-E-16 of course). However their days are counted.
Best regards,
Jonas
Am Mittwoch, den 10.08
would replace the harddisk with another
harddisk. Just go for an SSD and you'll most likely never ever have to
worry about it again. See:
http://juniper.cluepon.net/Replacing_the_harddisk_with_solid_state_flash
Jonas
Am Dienstag, den 03.05.2011, 13:23 -0700 schrieb Will Orton:
> I have ser
You dont really need netflow to find the host attacking if its a simple
attack.
Do this:
jonas@ffm3-edge# show firewall filter attack
term attack {
then {
log;
accept;
}
}
and then apply to your interface:
unit 0 {
family inet {
filter {
input
its coming in but the
traffic will still enter your interface and you might get charged for
it.
c) You can just route the IP beeing attacked to discard which is usefull
if you have multiple interfaces where the attack is incoming.
Regards,
Jonas Frey
Am Dienstag, den 05.04.2011, 13:00 +
Chris,
http://juniper.cluepon.net/Route_Engine_DRAM_Compatibility
RE-3 aka RE-600
Its SD-RAM, PC100 or PC133 (will run as PC100), ECC.
Registered ram will not work. Also you need to get low profile ram
otherwise it wont fit.
Regards,
Jonas
Am Donnerstag, den 24.03.2011, 16:14 -0700 schrieb
They are neccessary for termination of (vlan)-ccc circuits.
So if you just want to have mpls between two routers the non-B is fine.
Its just needed for ccc termination on endpoints.
Regards,
Jonas
Am Donnerstag, den 17.03.2011, 08:43 -0700 schrieb Chris Cappuccio:
> P-1GE-xx-B are necess
seconds
(yes i know it needs updating/upgrading...but it works well)
Regards,
Jonas
Am Dienstag, den 01.03.2011, 11:30 -0500 schrieb Dan Spataro:
> I know of one doing this. I would not recommend it in a production
> environment.
>
>
> DRAM 768 MB
>
Martin,
yes, thats the ones we use. We also tested the 2GB version, works fine.
Regards,
Jonas
Am Sonntag, den 20.02.2011, 23:44 +0200 schrieb Martin T:
> Pekka,
> by "Extreme model" did you mean this one: http://mcaf.ee/7f49a ?
>
> Jonas,
> did I understand correctly
was a RE-600 for the M40 which is part number RE-M40-600-2048
but these are very hard to find.
Regards,
Jonas
Am Montag, den 14.02.2011, 15:47 -0600 schrieb Max Pierson:
> Hi List,
>
>
> I have an old M40 (non-E) that I would like to upgrade as much as possible.
> I have RE-
bly others (atleast on T320/T640 RE-1600/RE-2000).
Am Freitag, den 11.02.2011, 12:14 +0200 schrieb Pekka Savola:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Jonas Frey (Probe Networks) wrote:
> > I doubt the PCMCIA Adapter is the problem. I guess its the CFmaybe
> > its too new. I know about se
I doubt the PCMCIA Adapter is the problem. I guess its the CFmaybe
its too new. I know about serveral newer CF cards not working in RE2/3.
Try to get a regular SanDisk 1GB+ CF. (not the Ultra/Extreme models).
This should work.
Regards,
Jonas
Am Freitag, den 11.02.2011, 08:43 + schrieb
Thats looks good...no idea why its not working.
Last time i made a install media i didnt specify the blocksize...so just
give it a try without bs=64k. Also no real need to blank the CF first.
Regards,
Jonas
Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2011, 16:11 + schrieb Martin T:
> Looks like I'm u
).
Regards,
Jonas
Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2011, 02:52 +0200 schrieb Martin T:
> Chris, Alex:
>
> so one needs to download "install-media-*", dd(1) this image(as I
> understand, it contains MBR and file-system with installation files)
> to CF and finally insert the CF to &quo
Hi,
good luck trying this. When i did this once it was a horrible mess. The
l2tp implementation is quite broken. The accounting is just not working
correctly and so on...
Stay with cisco...that'll save you alot of time.
Maybe the MX will have better l2tp supportsometime.
Regards,
Jonas
.
See
http://juniper.cluepon.net/Unofficial_hardware_upgrades
Regards,
Jonas
>
> Hi,
>
> I have four M20 chassis with continuous slot 0 SSB failures.
>
> These are from two completely different vendors..
>
> I would think, oh, a bad chassis, but I am getting this same
Not really. Both can do MPLS but only -B is capable of CCC VLANs
(513-1024) for MPLS.
Regards,
Jonas
Am Montag, den 27.12.2010, 16:10 -0800 schrieb Chris Cappuccio:
> Someone refresh my memory...is the -B variant the only one that is MPLS
> capable? What is the difference between P-
-24 months if they really iron out the
worst bugs. Bottom point...if you want something stable stay away (for
now).
Regards,
Jonas
Am Montag, den 13.12.2010, 15:50 -0600 schrieb Chris Adams:
> Once upon a time, Julien Goodwin said:
> > On 14/12/10 04:22, Phill Jolliffe wrote:
>
to upgrade the hard disk ?
>
> Somethin like:
>
> request system snapshot media ... ?
>
> Anyone knows how to do that ?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
>
> > Thank you Jonas !!
> >
> > Fernando Atilano| Transtelco| Networking& Support
> > MX 52.656.25
See cluepon:
http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Replacing_the_harddisk_with_solid_state_flash
Am Mittwoch, den 20.10.2010, 17:19 -0400 schrieb Fernando Atilano:
> Anybody that can provide as to how to replace a m10 hard disk? one of them
> failed.
>
> any feedback is greatly appreciated.
>
>
ak this to suit your needs. The above example
will allow everything upto /32 in size (usually what your customer will
want).
Regards,
Jonas
Am Mittwoch, den 20.10.2010, 12:46 +0100 schrieb Nick Ryce:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am starting to play with BGP and have set up some communities to separat
sonet card you can use a different fpc(-e) without problems (you can
remove the quad-wide sonet card).
IMO, rebooting wont help anything. Either it works via offline/online or
hardware-cycle of the card or nothing will help at all (defect).
Regards,
Jonas
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 05:11, Jose Madrid
...probably ttyd0.
See:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialconsole-setup.html
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/console-server/freebsd.html
Regards,
Jonas
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 17:42, Phill Jolliffe wrote:
> Maybe cheat? Put the old HDD in a working RE, (good
seems to be the latest.
When using this RE in a M5/M10 the system doesnt bootup, console shows
nothing.
Anyone aware of a 2nd gen RE-3.0 not working without E-FEB?
Regards,
Jonas Frey
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
Hi,
we do have T320's running on AC->DC...we are using rectifiers from C-Can
(www.c-can.com).
Regards,
Jonas Frey
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 19:09, OnePacket - Scott wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I have a question and was hoping somebody could point me in the right
> direction, I
ed up
dramatically.
Regards,
Jonas
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 19:30, TCIS List Acct wrote:
> Not had any issues yet, but we're doing a round of h/w upgrades on our M7i's
> and
> figured this was the time to do it if we were going to do it at all.
>
> Dan Farrell wrote:
> >
Kevin,
we are talking about 8.5 and not 9.3
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 02:47, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > From: Niels Ardts
> > Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:25:46 +0100
> > Sender: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
> >
> > That's weird.. We've asked JTAC for a release with this fix, and they gave
I am not using it, so i am not sure about the build date. However i know
it has all of the recent vulnerabilities fixed including the RSVP one.
Regards,
Jonas
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 17:50, Dave Diller wrote:
>
> > I do have jinstall-8.5S5-domestic-signed.tgz which is the fixed one.
I do have jinstall-8.5S5-domestic-signed.tgz which is the fixed one.
Never heard about S4.
Regards,
Jonas
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 15:48, TCIS List Acct wrote:
> Is it 8.5S4 or S5? A previous post specified S5...
>
> TIA.
>
> Niels Ardts wrote:
> > Hi,
> &
running 7.6 upwards and your junos is released before jan
2009 you should upgrade/downgrade immediatlythats the only real
solution.
Regards,
Jonas
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 21:46, André Luiz Bernardes wrote:
> Ok, the problem is real and the tcp bug looks like the major one. But
> has anyone
not vulnerable.
So after all the problematic code must have been introduced in 7.6.
Regards,
Jonas
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 20:49, Tim Eberhard wrote:
> Jonas,
>
> Correct firewall filters *will* block it as the firewall filter will
> keep the tcp port even responding. However if your
this on all releases. So ACL's do
work for some extend. Also you need an open port for this to work (BGP
etc).
Regards,
Jonas Frey
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:41, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Barry Greene:
>
> > The information is in the security advisory.
>
> Are the PSNs the se
This was a RE-333long time ago. Maybe the datasheet was changed over
time...not sure.
Havent tested this with a RE-400.
This ram shouldnt be more than a couple of bucks...so if you pick the
wrong one it shouldnt hurt too much.
Regards,
Jonas
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 16:11, Andy Harding wrote
We used:
Kingston KVR133X72C2/256
Also have a look at:
http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Route_Engine_DRAM_Compatibility#RE-2.0_Generic_DRAM
Regards,
Jonas
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 09:23, Andy Harding wrote:
> Welch, Bryan wrote:
> > We bought ours directly from Crucial for our M7i
ohh my god
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 19:58, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> http://www.e-gerbil.net/juniper_style_guide.pdf
> http://www.e-gerbil.net/cjr.png
>
> With apologies to Carl's Jr. :)
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
h
Hello,
yes thats perfectly possible.
But take care, beginning with JunOS 9.2 (iirc) the old FPC is no longer
supported AND will not work, only E-FPC will work.
Regards,
Jonas
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 13:02, iber-x wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> does Juniper support an FPC and E - FPC at the
I recommend using SSD's, see:
http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Replacing_the_harddisk_with_solid_state_flash
Regards,
Jonas
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I was wondering if anyone has successfully replaced a hard disk on a M7i
> >> RE-5.0. If so with what m
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
