Well, similar things happened on a machine with 2.4.26, with about 300
classes (for 150 users with different cir/mir for metro/extern). I
remade the classes and i applyed fw filters instead of u32, and now it
works very well on 2.4.26.
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:22:42 +0200, Dumitrache Ionut <[EMAIL
a "vampire", when will he gets it back when he needs it...?
thanks again
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Klauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb
> Am Sunday 17 October 2004
Am Sunday 17 October 2004 14:08 schrieb James Lista:
> do you have a small script example to show me ? ...
I don't know about the "small" part...
My own script: http://www.metamorpher.de/fairnat/
HTH
Andreas
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
Am Sunday 17 October 2004 15:02 schrieb James Lista:
> and about that you say take a look at ipp2p or l7-filter: errr, can
> they identify when a user changed edonkey or any other p2p default port
> and limit such packet even so
They try to. I'm using IPP2P and it works okay for me.
Althou
: James Lista ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 10:53
AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb
This is no good cause for example bittorent can
download on port 80 :D. So the best way is create classes with ceil parameter
for example 128kbit to ensure relability for every user
edonkey or any other p2p default port and limit
such packet even so
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Klauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb
> Am Sunday 17 October 2004
This is no good cause for example bittorent can
download on port 80 :D. So the best way is create classes with ceil parameter
for example 128kbit to ensure relability for every user and limit number of
connections to 50-80 per user. This the best (i can get a word grr- you
know) if you d
Am Sunday 17 October 2004 14:42 schrieb James Lista:
> 600kbit 50% for port 80
>30% for port 25 and 110
>20% for the rest
Sure, that's possible. That's one 600kbit class with three child classes.
However, there may be many other ports
Peter Huetmannsberger wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> I have also changed the things suggested by Stef earlier on:
> - HTB hysteries
> - PSCHED_CPU
> - QLENGTH in sfq
>
> Nothing seems to help. Kernel 2.4.27 distribution (RH9a)
Are you SURE the correct modules are being loaded?
___
Hi again,
I have also changed the things suggested by Stef earlier on:
- HTB hysteries
- PSCHED_CPU
- QLENGTH in sfq
Nothing seems to help. Kernel 2.4.27 distribution (RH9a)
Thanks,
.peter
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ma
On Thursday 14 October 2004 14:23, sistemas wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm new in this list and i hope to lear and to help if possible.
>
> But firt i need help :-(
>
> I have this messege in my syslog when my classes and qdiscs goes down.
>
> Can any one know what does it mean?
>
I used to have an Oops
Drink Linux wrote:
if i remove the 1 packet ... it would be again exceed
the ceiling ... thanks ill try
When you fix HTB you won't need it.
r u referring to this faq in docum??!?!?!
http://www.docum.org/docum.org/faq/cache/40.html
the file linux/include/net/sched/pkt_sched.h
include/net/pkt_sched.
if i remove the 1 packet ... it would be again exceed
the ceiling ... thanks ill try
r u referring to this faq in docum??!?!?!
http://www.docum.org/docum.org/faq/cache/40.html
the file linux/include/net/sched/pkt_sched.h
does not have #define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_CPU
im using 2.4.20-22 k
On Friday 08 October 2004 10:58, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Also you may need to set Hz higher or use psched = CPU for timing.
In 2.6.9 this looks like it'll be part of the `make config` process itself. :)
--
Jason Boxman
Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator
Shimberg Center for Affordable H
Drink Linux wrote:
hello Andy , i think they are right for
256kbps = 2048kbit ...
ahh I see.
I just tried your setup on my eth0 and it works OK. Though HTB's stats
don't seem too accurate - I used wget/ftp to judge rates.
You may need to patch HTB/use a newer kernel - there was a patch posted
o
hello Andy , i think they are right for
256kbps = 2048kbit ...
i have added a leaf pfifo with a limit of 1 packet per
second, coz if i have 2-10 it wont work...viola !!!
the ceiling rate for each class rule is now working...
my problem is that you can reach the ceiling class
only if you have 4-5
Drink Linux wrote:
Hello good day to all ... this is my setup
1 Linux Wireless Access Point, connected are 4
wireless gateway in which i needed to apply shaping
...
ok here is the weird part... clients on each gateway
download files from the Acess Point ... a 500 mb file
through ftp
on gateway 1 wh
Peter Huetmannsberger wrote:
I have changed my setup accordingly now, however there are still packets
showing up on the default qdisc when I go through the tunnel, about half
the packets don't seem to match.
If there really only is udp traffic on port 5001, I don't see why your
rules should mat
Hi, many thanks for your help.
I have changed my setup accordingly now, however there are still packets
showing up on the default qdisc when I go through the tunnel, about half
the packets don't seem to match.
Did you see anything wrong with the filter rules. Openvpn uses port 5001
on both
Peter Huetmannsberger wrote:
The idea was that all traffic going through the tunnel would have top
priority and the rest share what's left. Sounded simple enough.
You could use a prio queue for that. Tunnel on band 0, rest on band 1.
Downside is that there may be nothing left for the rest to sha
Am Tuesday 07 September 2004 23:18 schrieb Cow:
> zytec: (?)
> > I assume that you want somethink like:
> > data from server to LAN (PC1,PC2) unshaped (full 100mbit)
> > data from Internet to LAN shaped
>
> Correct.
Not really an example, but you may have a look at my script [1].
It solves the 10
Dnia poniedziałek 06 wrzesień 2004 23:56, Cow napisał:
> Hi folks.
>
> Let's say I would like to make some bandwidth control on my network
> using HTB. I have 2 clients:
[...]
> I think a script as i described, could be very complex to write,
> therefore i ask, whoever is here, for help.
> Thank yo
Stefan Gold wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'm using HTB to shape my outgoing traffic over a ADSL-link with PPPoE with a
nominal bandwidth of 128kbit/s. My goal is to favour small packets like ACKs
and interactive services like ssh; in other words, I want to achieve l
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 01:40:48 +0200
> Please write what commands do you use to see "the counter" and what counter
> do you mean? I think counter for ip packets isn't it?
I'm using iptables -L -v -x -t mangle
and look for my rule. My assumptions is that if the counter is counting up in the
iptables
>>I can see the counter works in iptables, but in the htb, it doesn't go to
the right class
Please write what commands do you use to see "the counter" and what counter
do you mean? I think counter for ip packets isn't it?
You can try to see my problem in LARTC archive: "HTB 3.13 please help".
In
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 14:31:06 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> it looks like you might have a problem with your marking with the FW.
That's what I thought, but I can't troubleshoot any other way.
I tried both ways 0x80, 80 to the same affect.
The strange problem is if I omitted the source ip part,
it looks like you might have a problem with your marking with the FW.
>#-A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp --sport 3128 -j MARK --set-mark 0x2
>-A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j others
>-A personal -j MARK --set-mark 40
>-A others -j MARK --set-mark 20
>From Looking at this I see the first commented lin
Ok,
here's my new htb config
#!/bin/bash
tc qdisc del dev eth1 root
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 80 debug 333
tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 60kbit ceil 60kbit
tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 20kbit ceil 65kbit prio 3
tc class
only short answer test
sorry
- Original Message -
From: "Ing Isianto Istiadi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb and fw problems
> Dear, I have change
> tc class add dev eth1 pa
Dear Isianto Istiadi,
Here are your class creation statements:
: [ snip ] 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 65kbps ceil 65kbps
: [ snip ] 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 20kbps ceil 35kbps prio 3
: [ snip ] 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 5kbps ceil 10kbps prio 0
: [ snip ] 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate 8kbps ceil
Hello,
On Wednesday 04 August 2004 11:00, Ing Isianto Istiadi wrote:
> I'm using the kernel 2.6.6, iproute2-2.4.7.20020116, iptables v1.2.9, and
> gentoo. I have a leased-line 64 kbps.
> I can see the counter works in iptables, but in the htb, it doesn't go to
> the right class (it always go to t
--- Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Ing Isianto Istiadi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 1:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb and fw problems
>
>
> > hi!
> > your default class must not have rate grater
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ing Isianto Istiadi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb and fw problems
> hi!
> your default class must not have rate grater than your desired speed rat
> match ip sport 80 0x classid 1:11
Take some more reading :)
Good luck.
- Original Message -
From: "Mpourtounis Dimitris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lartc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB clas
Hello Mpourtounis,
: When i start downloading from node, its http taffic for examle is
: really shaped at 50. When i start downloading via sftp (port 22),
: its sftp traffic is really shaped at 30. But, if when there is an
: http as well as an sftp session at the same time, total bandw
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:13 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB classifying
> OK what's the address of eth0? Is the BOX with NAT ?
> I think you could send a bit of your true script and describe a bit of
your
> network especially the part when this situation is happeniing . If you
> rea
CTED]>
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 1:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB classifying
>
>
> > Maybe it's my oversight but shoudn't you have "tc qdisc add dev eth0
root
> > handle 1:0 htb" before rest of your instructions ??
> >
> > > I
Maybe it's my oversight but shoudn't you have "tc qdisc add dev eth0 root
handle 1:0 htb" before rest of your instructions ??
> I am trying to shape a client (somewhat advanced).
>
> This is my target:
> Client is 192.168.2.224. I would like to allow him to download with
> 50 bits/sec in gen
Check if you have HTB support in your kernel.
it must be in kernel/net/sched
- Original Message -
From: "Antonin Karasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:58 PM
Subject: [LARTC] HTB & tc
> Hi,
> I'm trying to make run a simple shaping *through H
OT: Dudes, why i have to reedit To field and delete CC field, gmail
see this as spam
Now, make sure you compiled the kernel with htb, latest stable kernel
is 2.4.26 or 2.6.7
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:58:40 +0200, Antonin Karasek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to make run a simple sha
I've found that i have messagess like this in /var/log/messages:
Jul 20 20:11:26 (none) last message repeated 9 times
Jul 20 20:11:30 (none) kernel: NET: 173 messages suppressed.
Jul 20 20:11:30 (none) kernel: dst cache overflow
Jul 20 20:12:59 (none) kernel: NET: 14 messages suppressed.
- O
Shouldn't you assign priorities to your classes? Also make RED a leaf queue
for more more smooth TCP experience
Dmitry
On Saturday 10 July 2004 01:48, toto toto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have problems setting up HTB.
> This is my setup :
>
> NET 1024/256 ADSL
>
> eth1
> Linux Fir
On Saturday 10 July 2004 05:54, toto toto wrote:
> Hello,
> I have problems setting up HTB.
> This is my setup :
> NET
> 1024/256 ADSL
> eth1
> Linux Firewall
> eth0
> LAN 10.a.a.a
> I want to GUARANTEE for an IP (10.x.y.z) a 800kbit
> bandwidth for HTTP download.
> But When 10.x.y.z does no HTTP d
yes but I'm not sure if RB three lib is in 2.4.14
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can I backport 2.4.20 kernel version's HTB related changes to 2.4.14 ? Will this
> work w/o any issues ?
> Please consider this urgent and replay asap.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Reema.
> __
Yes, that's what I was trying to ask below. I'm still trying to figure
out which class (in the : format) the error message is
referring to.
It's about class 1:7.
So, since I'm not sure which class it is (and I have several htb
qdiscs; oh, I just realized that I neglected to mention that I'm using
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 09:18:11AM +0300, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Glen Mabey wrote:
>
> >I'm getting the following error/warning at some point in my config
> >script, and I'm not sure which class it is referring to.
> >
> >htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!
>
> What qdisc
Our ISP has given us 5 static IP address plus one router IP address and I
was wondering if I could get rid of their stupid EN5861 router and set up
the linux machine to handle all the static addresses and routing. I figured
I'd have to set up alises for other IP addresses eg ifconfig eth0:0
xx.xx
Hi all,
Our ISP has given us 5 static IP address plus one router IP address and I
was wondering if I could get rid of their stupid EN5861 router and set up
the linux machine to handle all the static addresses and routing. I figured
I'd have to set up alises for other IP addresses eg ifconfig eth0
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Glen Mabey wrote:
I'm getting the following error/warning at some point in my config
script, and I'm not sure which class it is referring to.
htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!
What qdisc is attached to this class?
I [think I] understand that htb is a non-work-conserving
Am Thursday 01 July 2004 22:52 schrieb Stef Coene:
> So it's possible to drag the tokens negative if the child class is more
> sending packets then the parent allows.
If I understand you right, it's only the parent classes that can get
negative tokens this way. But I also have leaf classes with n
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 19:13, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> The problems are:
> 1. Using HTB I get negative values for tokens and ctokens in tc -s
> output, for example:
This is perfectly possible. It depends on your configuration and the
parent-child relation ship between the class
Am Wednesday 30 June 2004 19:13 schrieb Alexander Kotelnikov:
> Using HTB I get negative values for tokens and ctokens in tc -s output
Can't help you there.
> class htb 1:13 parent 1:1 prio 7 quantum 1024 rate 8Kbit ceil 16Kbit
[...]
> 12307 pkts (dropped 20013, overlimits 0)
> I get traffic s
Hi Devik, I played with your htbfair patch on 2.6.6 and found some
diferences between 2.4 to 2.6 that cause problems when applying it.
Diferences include rb_node that was rb_node_t and some other minor probs.
After "fixing" those diff troubles I still get the following error
compiling the kerne
I assume you saw the patch - and it's OK now?
Andy.
Yes, I was the one who tested it before Devik made it public :)
(and he wrote my name together with info about this patch)
I wrote to him about that after you confirmed you can see the same
behavior of htb.
Now it works PERFECT!
(three times 'hip
Vincent Perrier wrote:
HTB versus HFSC, both qdisc offer the same kind of service,
if you want to see comparative test results, go to
http://www.rawsoft.org
at the line "TEST RESULTS" you will find the results for
a sharing test and a burst test.
You will see that both qdisc are good.
Nice comparis
Andy Furniss wrote:
I finally got this to work - I forgot to use gcc 2.59.3 to do the module
- the one 3.3.3 made segfaulted and stopped tc and ifconfig from working
thereafter.
I tested and found that the same happens without the patch.
It works - It has fixed the problem pljosh described :-)
On Thursday 24 June 2004 13:21, Vincent Perrier wrote:
> HTB versus HFSC, both qdisc offer the same kind of service,
> if you want to see comparative test results, go to
> http://www.rawsoft.org
> at the line "TEST RESULTS" you will find the results for
> a sharing test and a burst test.
> You will
devik wrote:
Witold Szczerba spent his time evaluating fairness of borrowing. His
troubles inspired me enough to analyze the problem: When a class changes
from yellow to green it disconnects itself from parent's feedlist.
Unfortunately it resets feed pointer to the first child. I created a patch
wh
pljosh wrote:
Użytkownik Andy Furniss napisał:
I just tried with 2 d/l and 3 classes - I see the same as you now.
Andy.
I am happy that there is finally confirmation of what I've seen :)
But what now? I am just starting with traffic shaping and my question
is: how is that - that so many people ar
I finaly found why my filters woulden't work, I was using grouping maches
up with quotation(") chars. This caused tc to silently IGNORE thoes
matches while letting other non-quotated matches to work normaly, within
the same tc cmd.
I reworked my whole script to use 10:0 as the parent for filters,
I finaly found why my filters woulden't work, I was using grouping maches
up with quotation(") chars. This caused tc to silently IGNORE thoes
matches while letting other non-quotated matches to work normaly, within
the same tc cmd.
I reworked my whole script to use 10:0 as the parent for filters,
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 06:19, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> On http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm...
> There is a nice explanation on how/why to setup a hierarchy with HTB.
> Howerver what is missing is how to setup finters for this case?
For more information and examples: http://docum.or
On Wednesday 23 June 2004 01:57, Svetozar Mihailov wrote:
> > Shouldn't this:
> > > tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:200 htb rate 100Mbit prio 10
> >
> > be "parent 2:"?
> >
> > Ed W
>
> That change nothing. I have running system with 800 PC , 4 classes for
> each. There is no difference
> Shouldn't this:
>
> >
> > tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:200 htb rate 100Mbit prio 10
>
>
> be "parent 2:"?
>
> Ed W
>
That change nothing. I have running system with 800 PC , 4 classes for each.
There is no difference for me in using "parent 2:" vs "parent 2:0". Both
give same resul
Shouldn't this:
tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:200 htb rate 100Mbit prio 10
be "parent 2:"?
Ed W
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does someone have expirience with HTB and kernel 2.6.5 and up...
Does anyone have tested it with thousand of classes and filters..
How it behaves..
Depends on how many filters/classes, how much traffic. If you have a lot
of filters, you must use hashes
Użytkownik Andy Furniss napisał:
I just tried with 2 d/l and 3 classes - I see the same as you now.
Andy.
I am happy that there is finally confirmation of what I've seen :)
But what now? I am just starting with traffic shaping and my question
is: how is that - that so many people are using HTB for
Andy Furniss wrote:
pljosh wrote:
Użytkownik Andy Furniss napisał:
I tried with your rc.shape script on my LAN using scp. I couldn't get
the bash to work - it looks to me like it will only set one user. But I
Did you launch it passing argument in "" or ''?
./rc.shape "4 5 6"
is quite far differe
p.s.
I made same test on other network with other PCs and different kernel
version and it was the same...
Have you got something recent? Try a 2.6.5 or newer kernel perhaps -
this has 1000Hz scheduling (I think) and presumably the latest HTB
patches. I guess make sure your tc is up to date a
pljosh wrote:
Użytkownik Andy Furniss napisał:
I tried with your rc.shape script on my LAN using scp. I couldn't get
the bash to work - it looks to me like it will only set one user. But I
Did you launch it passing argument in "" or ''?
./rc.shape "4 5 6"
is quite far different than
./rc.shape 4
Użytkownik Andy Furniss napisał:
I tried with your rc.shape script on my LAN using scp. I couldn't get
the bash to work - it looks to me like it will only set one user. But I
Did you launch it passing argument in "" or ''?
./rc.shape "4 5 6"
is quite far different than
./rc.shape 4 5 6
hardcoded
pljosh wrote:
HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c.
I did it, recompiled, launched... and i looks like it is even a little
bit worser: user1 has almost twice as much BW as user3...
I DO NOT GET IT
IT LOOKS LIKE HTB WORKS FOR EVERYONE EXCEPT ME :(
I tried with your rc.shape script on my LAN u
HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c.
I did it, recompiled, launched... and i looks like it is even a little
bit worser: user1 has almost twice as much BW as user3...
I DO NOT GET IT
IT LOOKS LIKE HTB WORKS FOR EVERYONE EXCEPT ME :(
___
LARTC mailin
I meant to say aswell, that if you are doing the tests on downloads you
need to throttle to about 80% of your rate, so you can build up queues
and have a bit of spare for latency.
This 80% rule doesnt affect me as I am doing this on my local 100mbit
network. I mean all the traffic is local - ins
Andy Furniss wrote:
I also have half your bandwidth - and it was set at 400kbit for the test.
I meant to say aswell, that if you are doing the tests on downloads you
need to throttle to about 80% of your rate, so you can build up queues
and have a bit of spare for latency.
Andy.
pljosh wrote:
I just tested with my script and also see a 5-8% advantage for the
lower handle class.
I wouldn't call it a bug though - HTB is written for high traffic
setups and trade off needs to be made between perfect behaviour and
CPU usage and you say it gets better with more classes.
I just tested with my script and also see a 5-8% advantage for the lower
handle class.
I wouldn't call it a bug though - HTB is written for high traffic setups
and trade off needs to be made between perfect behaviour and CPU usage
and you say it gets better with more classes.
Andy.
Well - y
pljosh wrote:
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
Hmm, interesting. Can you switch the order of your IP mappings around
on this test so that you can prove that it is some feature of HTB that
user1 always gets more bandwidth, and no something about that machine
(ie if you swap ip's for user1 and 3 that it still
Użytkownik Ed Wildgoose napisał:
(see the "htb_lookup_leaf" function for details)
Hope that helps...
Hmm... My greatest C program was the most simple snmp client you can
ever imagine - and I was writing it for 2 weeks to finish my classes...
So I think it is not good idea for me to patch (or even
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
pljosh wrote:
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
Hmm, interesting. Can you switch the order of your IP mappings
around on this test so that you can prove that it is some feature of
HTB that user1 always gets more bandwidth, and no something about
that machine (ie if you swap ip's for user1
pljosh wrote:
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
Hmm, interesting. Can you switch the order of your IP mappings
around on this test so that you can prove that it is some feature of
HTB that user1 always gets more bandwidth, and no something about
that machine (ie if you swap ip's for user1 and 3 that it still
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
Hmm, interesting. Can you switch the order of your IP mappings around
on this test so that you can prove that it is some feature of HTB that
user1 always gets more bandwidth, and no something about that machine
(ie if you swap ip's for user1 and 3 that it still remains (the
HTB should give fifty-fifty to U1 and U3... but it is not...
What is happening is that HTB gives about 350-380kbit for user3 and
everything else(more than 600kbit) for user1... this period is marked
as "t1" on my graph...
Hmm, interesting. Can you switch the order of your IP mappings around
o
Thanks very much, Devik and Andy, I had seminar today and I think it has some
success, and (for now?) I do not feel like having unanswered questions.
Dmitry
On Sunday 13 June 2004 21:41, Martin Devera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1. In order of priority, we satisfy all leaf classes' rates (whi
> 1. In order of priority, we satisfy all leaf classes' rates (while the class
> is ?green?)
> 2. When the leaf classes' rate is reached (all the leaf classes are ?yellow?),
> borrow the unused speed from parent classes if they have something to give
> (if they are not ?red?). In this case, each le
Dmitry Golubev wrote:
One think I do not understand neither for SFQ nor for HTB (please explain for
both) - how can we maintain fairness in case of differently-sizes packets. As
I understand, one packet is atomic unit, and interface is requesting not more
and not less than one packet.
I don't
OK then, could you tell if I understand correctly and correct me if not?
1. In order of priority, we satisfy all leaf classes' rates (while the class
is “green”)
2. When the leaf classes' rate is reached (all the leaf classes are “yellow”),
borrow the unused speed from parent classes if they hav
On Saturday 12 June 2004 13:46, Dmitry Golubev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been searching for HTB theory documentation and found two
> interesting sources - Devik's page and docum.org FAQ. In some places they
> are
> contradictory which make me think that Devik's theoretic document (marked
> "actual
> tc qdisc add dev ethX parent HTBCLASS handle QDISC pfifo limit 10
Thanks guys, reducing the queue length to 10 packets the delay decreased
from about 2600ms (2.6 seconds) to 80ms. That helps a lot!
Regards
--
"Sie haben neue Mails!" - Die GMX Toolbar informiert Sie beim Surfen!
Jetzt aktiviere
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Thierry Coutelier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
We got the following message on the console of one of our server:
~ HTB: dequeue bug (8,12140714,12140714), report it please !
The server is a Dell Poweredge with 2 CPUs running a 2.5.25 Kernel.
It is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> Can someone point me how to reduce this queue length or wich else qdisc I
> can use to improve latency? All I need is a short queue in addition to the
> shaping accuracy of HTB. Things like SFQ don't help. CBQ is a bit faster but
> far more in
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
Reading your other post I see your small traffic is ~100b - this would
use three cells, so as a temporary kludge you could set your mpu to
159 and see how it goes.
AFAIK the author of the HTB patch is looking into modifying it to do
the sums properly for DSL. There isn't on
Jason Boxman wrote:
On Friday 28 May 2004 14:54, Andy Furniss wrote:
Reading your other post I see your small traffic is ~100b - this would
use three cells, so as a temporary kludge you could set your mpu to 159
and see how it goes.
AFAIK the author of the HTB patch is looking into modifying it to
Reading your other post I see your small traffic is ~100b - this would
use three cells, so as a temporary kludge you could set your mpu to
159 and see how it goes.
AFAIK the author of the HTB patch is looking into modifying it to do
the sums properly for DSL. There isn't one answer though - Ed
On Friday 28 May 2004 14:54, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Reading your other post I see your small traffic is ~100b - this would
> use three cells, so as a temporary kludge you could set your mpu to 159
> and see how it goes.
>
> AFAIK the author of the HTB patch is looking into modifying it to do the
>
Jason Boxman wrote:
On Friday 14 May 2004 03:05, Ed Wildgoose wrote:
I appears that you could change the patch in tc/core in fn
tc_calc_rtable, from:
+ if (overhead)
+ sz += overhead;
to something like:
+ if (overhead)
+ sz += (((sz-1)/mpu)+1) * overhead;
I did that and recompiled ipr
Andreas Klauer wrote:
Am Tuesday 18 May 2004 08:38 schrieb Ed Wildgoose:
I would code this as:
size = ( (int)((datasize-1)/48) + 1) * 53
You could hardcode something similar into your tc and see if it helps
(just remove PMU and overhead code added by the existing patch).
How does modifying
Am Tuesday 18 May 2004 08:38 schrieb Ed Wildgoose:
> I would code this as:
>
> size = ( (int)((datasize-1)/48) + 1) * 53
>
> You could hardcode something similar into your tc and see if it helps
> (just remove PMU and overhead code added by the existing patch).
How does modifying the tc code affe
Jason Boxman wrote:
On Friday 14 May 2004 03:05, Ed Wildgoose wrote:
I appears that you could change the patch in tc/core in fn
tc_calc_rtable, from:
+ if (overhead)
+ sz += overhead;
to something like:
+ if (overhead)
+ sz += (((sz-1)/mpu)+1) * overhead;
I did that and recompi
On Friday 14 May 2004 03:05, Ed Wildgoose wrote:
> I appears that you could change the patch in tc/core in fn
> tc_calc_rtable, from:
>
> + if (overhead)
> + sz += overhead;
>
> to something like:
>
> + if (overhead)
> + sz += (((sz-1)/mpu)+1) * overhead;
I did that and recompiled
301 - 400 of 854 matches
Mail list logo
