Re: [leaf-devel] CVS

On 02/16/2012 09:24 AM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am 30.01.2012 21:31, schrieb Mike Noyes: >> Everyone, >> I backed up our old CVS repository, uploaded it to the SF FRS, truncated >> CVS with adminrepo, hid our leaf-cvs-commits mailing list (delete?), and >> disabled CVS. >> >> Revision *1.4* - (*sh

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS

Am 30.01.2012 21:31, schrieb Mike Noyes: > Everyone, > I backed up our old CVS repository, uploaded it to the SF FRS, truncated > CVS with adminrepo, hid our leaf-cvs-commits mailing list (delete?), and > disabled CVS. > > Revision *1.4* - (*show annotations* >

[leaf-devel] CVS

Everyone, I backed up our old CVS repository, uploaded it to the SF FRS, truncated CVS with adminrepo, hid our leaf-cvs-commits mailing list (delete?), and disabled CVS. Revision *1.4* - (*show annotations* ) (*download*

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Backups

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/31/2011 3:18 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > I tried browsing the subversion repository, and it didn't seem to > work...I'm not sure if that's due to there being nothing there or a > result of the recent security issues with SF. I should have a

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs cleanup

Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010, um 23:36:10 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer: > Am Dienstag, 30. November 2010, 15:55:23 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer: > > Am Samstag, 27. November 2010, 22:30:13 schrieb davidMbrooke: > > > On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 15:58 +, davidMbrooke wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 07:28

[leaf-devel] cvs cleanup

Am Dienstag, 30. November 2010, 15:55:23 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer: > Am Samstag, 27. November 2010, 22:30:13 schrieb davidMbrooke: > > On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 15:58 +, davidMbrooke wrote: > > > On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 07:28 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 08:07 -0800, Mike Noy

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs structure

On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 23:11 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am Montag, 1. November 2010, 22:04:59 schrieb davidMbrooke: > > On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:32 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > > David; > > > > > > Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 22:09:54 schrieb davidMbrooke: > > > > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs structure

Am Montag, 1. November 2010, 22:04:59 schrieb davidMbrooke: > On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:32 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > David; > > > > Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 22:09:54 schrieb davidMbrooke: > > > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:50 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > > > Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 20

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs structure

On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:32 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > David; > > Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 22:09:54 schrieb davidMbrooke: > > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:50 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > > Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 20:25:58 schrieb Andrew: > > > > > > Ok; I propose: > > > - just "c

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs structure

David; Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 22:09:54 schrieb davidMbrooke: > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:50 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 20:25:58 schrieb Andrew: > > > > Ok; I propose: > > - just "core" and "contrib" repository (names are not fixed), testing > > isn't nee

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs structure

On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:50 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: -snip- > Ok; I propose: > - just "core" and "contrib" repository (names are not fixed), testing isn't > needed - we can also put packages in contrib which we consider for testing > or provided as-is. > - lrp's and sources are required fo

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs structure

On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:50 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 20:25:58 schrieb Andrew: > > Ok; I propose: > - just "core" and "contrib" repository (names are not fixed), testing isn't > needed - we can also put packages in contrib which we consider for testing > or

[leaf-devel] cvs structure

Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 20:25:58 schrieb Andrew: > 29.10.2010 20:29, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > - Shall we provide compiled packages, as we did with Bering-uClibc > > ("packages page"), better ideas? > > IMHO it'll be good to provide separate packages and prebuilt full image > - like it was

[leaf-devel] CVS structure and buildtool

Hi Martin on 29.09.2010 20:12, Martin Hejl wrote: > Hi Erich, > >> Either way, what is the canonical way to keep an existing build >> environment in sync with CVS. Buildtool does not check for modifications >> once a package is built. > since nobody else chimed in (and since I'm partly to blame f

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS access problems - No write permission

On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 10:18 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: > On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 18:06 +, davidMbrooke wrote: > > Hi, > > I have been trying to check in some changes to package "ntp" as per my > > postings to leaf-user in January. I tried a couple of times on Monday > > and again yesterday si

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS access problems - No write permission

On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 18:06 +, davidMbrooke wrote: > Hi, > I have been trying to check in some changes to package "ntp" as per my > postings to leaf-user in January. I tried a couple of times on Monday > and again yesterday since I know that sometimes SourceForge has issues. > >

[leaf-devel] CVS access problems - No write permission

Hi, I have been trying to check in some changes to package "ntp" as per my postings to leaf-user in January. I tried a couple of times on Monday and again yesterday since I know that sometimes SourceForge has issues. I can write to leaf/devel/davidmbrooke/src/bering-uclibc/apps bu

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs commits

Hi kp, > it seems that the cvs-commit mailinglist or the feature that commits activate > a message on that list is broken. > I've heard of various pb's with the latest SF platform update, maybe this ir > related? as discussed off list, the missing cvs-commit messages from our new team memeber

[leaf-devel] cvs commits

Hello; it seems that the cvs-commit mailinglist or the feature that commits activate a message on that list is broken. I've heard of various pb's with the latest SF platform update, maybe this ir related? kp -- The N

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS migration to SVN?

On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 20:57 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > I do not see a real need to migrate. > > The current cvs usage "just works" and I haven't heart complains from users > that there are any difficulties using cvs. Not to mention performance pb's > with the few checkouts a week. a simpl

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS migration to SVN?

Hi all, > -Original Message- > From: KP Kirchdoerfer [mailto:kap...@users.sourceforge.net] > Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 7:58 PM > To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] CVS migration to SVN? > > Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2009 18:56:

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS status

On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 12:43 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 12:17 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > > 2009-03-10: Service CVS unplanned downtime - UPDATE > > http://apps.sourceforge.net/wordpress/sourceforge/2009/03/11/2009-03-10-service-cvs-unplanned-downtime-update/ > > 2009-03-10: Ser

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS migration to SVN?

Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2009 18:56:09 schrieb Mike Noyes: > Everyone, > I think we should migrate to SVN. SVN integrates with Track well, and: > > 1. Availability will be better on other services; we > have a more scalable and resilient infrastructure under them > 2. Perfo

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS status

On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 12:17 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > 2009-03-10: Service CVS unplanned downtime - UPDATE > http://apps.sourceforge.net/wordpress/sourceforge/2009/03/11/2009-03-10-service-cvs-unplanned-downtime-update/ 2009-03-10: Service CVS unplanned downtime - UPDATE 2 http://apps.sourceforge.

[leaf-devel] CVS migration to SVN?

Everyone, I think we should migrate to SVN. SVN integrates with Track well, and: 1. Availability will be better on other services; we have a more scalable and resilient infrastructure under them 2. Performance will be substantially better for any ops that actually

[leaf-devel] CVS status

2009-03-10: Service CVS unplanned downtime - UPDATE http://apps.sourceforge.net/wordpress/sourceforge/2009/03/11/2009-03-10-service-cvs-unplanned-downtime-update/ -- Mike Noyes http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: leaf, sitedocs -

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS checkin glitch

Mike Noyes schrieb: .. > > KP & Erich, > I noticed that issue a while ago. I'll try to attend to it next week. Thanks that would be great, there is a copy of r1000 in the contribute limb so removing the wrong one at the root should be enough > > Note: my track record for attending to r

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS checkin glitch

On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 02:09, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > On Tuesday 03 July 2007 09:08:29 Erich Titl wrote: > > Hi Folks > > > > I just happened to look into CVS and found a r1000 directory right at > > the root. This is certainly due to me doing an inapropriate checkin to > > the wrong location some

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS checkin glitch

On Tuesday 03 July 2007 09:08:29 Erich Titl wrote: > Hi Folks > > I just happened to look into CVS and found a r1000 directory right at > the root. This is certainly due to me doing an inapropriate checkin to > the wrong location some time ago. Could someone with admin rights please > move the thin

[leaf-devel] CVS checkin glitch

Hi Folks I just happened to look into CVS and found a r1000 directory right at the root. This is certainly due to me doing an inapropriate checkin to the wrong location some time ago. Could someone with admin rights please move the thing to a better position within the tree? Thanks Erich --

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

KP KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2007 13:41:33 schrieb Erich Titl: >> luna > ./buildtool.pl build buildenv >> make the list of required source packages: linux,buildenv [0.K.] >> >> source/package: linux >> >> downloading: buildtool.cfg from server cvs-s

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2007 13:41:33 schrieb Erich Titl: > luna > ./buildtool.pl build buildenv > make the list of required source packages: linux,buildenv [0.K.] > > source/package: linux > > downloading: buildtool.cfg from server cvs-sourceforge type viewcvs > wget fail

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

luna > ./buildtool.pl build buildenv make the list of required source packages: linux,buildenv [0.K.] source/package: linux downloading: buildtool.cfg from server cvs-sourceforge type viewcvs wget failed: /data/leaf/bering-uclibc/devel/latest/src/bering-uclibc/buildtool/so

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2007 08:13:58 schrieb Erich Titl: > Mike > > Mike Noyes wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:06, Erich Titl wrote: > >> Hi Mike, KP if you read along > >> > >> there is more to it, I changed the server name in sources.cfg to see > >> where it leads to... > > > > > > > >> It

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

Hi Erich Titl wrote: > Mike > > Mike Noyes wrote: >> On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:06, Erich Titl wrote: >>> Hi Mike, KP if you read along >>> >>> there is more to it, I changed the server name in sources.cfg to see >>> where it leads to... >> >>> It appears that the path on the server has changed to

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

Mike Mike Noyes wrote: > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:06, Erich Titl wrote: >> Hi Mike, KP if you read along >> >> there is more to it, I changed the server name in sources.cfg to see >> where it leads to... > >> It appears that the path on the server has changed too. Looks like >> cgi-bin moved some

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:06, Erich Titl wrote: > Hi Mike, KP if you read along > > there is more to it, I changed the server name in sources.cfg to see > where it leads to... > It appears that the path on the server has changed too. Looks like > cgi-bin moved somewhere else. Erich, When the SF s

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

Hi Mike, KP if you read along there is more to it, I changed the server name in sources.cfg to see where it leads to... Erich Titl schrieb: > Hi Mike > > Mike Noyes schrieb: >> On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 13:12, Erich Titl wrote: >>> Erich Titl schrieb: You are more familiar to the SF procedures

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

Hi Mike Mike Noyes schrieb: > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 13:12, Erich Titl wrote: >> Erich Titl schrieb: >>> You are more familiar to the SF procedures than I am. I would not even >>> know where to look. Could you give me a hand? >> I somehow managed to enter an SR. Will see where this leads to. > > E

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs pb's

On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 12:13, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2007 19:40:51 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 07:56, Erich Titl wrote: > > > Sorry again, even more info > > > > > > 16:55:45.633503 IP cvs.sourceforge.net > luna.think.ch: icmp 68: host > > > cvs.sourceforge

[leaf-devel] cvs pb's

Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2007 19:40:51 schrieb Mike Noyes: > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 07:56, Erich Titl wrote: > > Sorry again, even more info > > > > 16:55:45.633503 IP cvs.sourceforge.net > luna.think.ch: icmp 68: host > > cvs.sourceforge.net unreachable - admin prohibited > > Erich, > I just checked

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erich Titl wrote: > Charles Steinkuehler wrote: >> Erich Titl wrote: >>>- adding a tag does not create overhead to the CVS archive (unless we >>>use subversion) >> >> Tags do not create overhead in subversion, either. > > I must have misunderstood y

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Erich Titl wrote: > > >>- adding a tag does not create overhead to the CVS archive (unless we >>use subversion) > > > Tags do not create overhead in subversion, either. I must have misunderstood you then, proba

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erich Titl wrote: > - adding a tag does not create overhead to the CVS archive (unless we > use subversion) Tags do not create overhead in subversion, either. - -- Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 10:07, Erich Titl wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 13:17, Martin Hejl wrote: > > > >>>Ideally, building from a local working-copy of the repository will be > >>>fairly easy (it sounds like this is getting tested RealSoonNow). This > >>>would separate down

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Mike Noyes wrote: > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 13:17, Martin Hejl wrote: > >>>Ideally, building from a local working-copy of the repository will be >>>fairly easy (it sounds like this is getting tested RealSoonNow). This >>>would separate download problems from actually building the source >>>(possibl

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 13:17, Martin Hejl wrote: > > Ideally, building from a local working-copy of the repository will be > > fairly easy (it sounds like this is getting tested RealSoonNow). This > > would separate download problems from actually building the source > > (possibly important for tho

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Hi Charles, > This is where subversion's branching would really shine. You would > simply change the repository URL in the main config file and 'head' > would point to the latest version of that branch, which is probably what > you'd want (ie: security updates/bug fixes included). Ah, ok, I get i

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Hejl wrote: > Hi Erich, > >> I assume the code within buildtool to access a certain file is pretty >> central. How difficult is it for this piece of code to use an >> environment variable specifying a TAG (defaulting to HEAD). > > It is, but th

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Hi again, Martin Hejl wrote: > * Check out src/bering-uclibc/buildtool for the release branch of 2.4.1 > * check out src/bering-uclibc/apps for the release branch of 2.4.1 > * modify cvs-sourceforge use the "file" target for server > cvs-sourceforge and make it point to the cvs checkout of > s

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Hi Mike, > Is buildtool able to use a checked out working copy to build from? It is, if one adjusts the main config (changes the "cvs-sourceforge" server setting in conf/sources.cfg to use the "file" type, which will use the local filesystem rather than CVS). But wether that will work to build an

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Hi Erich, > I assume the code within buildtool to access a certain file is pretty > central. How difficult is it for this piece of code to use an > environment variable specifying a TAG (defaulting to HEAD). It is, but that doesn't solve the problem. The idea behind buildtool is that it can use wh

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Hi Mike; Am Freitag, 5. Mai 2006 19:24 schrieb Mike Noyes: > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 09:10, Martin Hejl wrote: > > Mike Noyes wrote: > > > Tagging the release in cvs is easier. > > > > > > http://ximbiot.com/cvs/manual/cvs-1.11.21/cvs_4.html#SEC48 > > > > Adding the tag is not the problem. >

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Martin Martin Hejl wrote: ..> Adding the tag is not the problem. Updating buildtool to use the tag/branch is. That's why creating a snapshot of a buildenv "base" (all the sources downloaded, but nothing compiled yet) is much easier for us than tagging the release, creating a maintenance branch (

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 09:10, Martin Hejl wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > > Tagging the release in cvs is easier. > > > > http://ximbiot.com/cvs/manual/cvs-1.11.21/cvs_4.html#SEC48 > > Adding the tag is not the problem. Martin, Agreed, and this is probably causing me confusion. > Updating bu

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Hi Mike, Mike Noyes wrote: > Subject was: Re: [leaf-devel] Glitch in initrd backup when using > alternative initrdfile > > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 02:58, Eric Spakman wrote: > >>>How does one to go about building the buildenv for a specific release, >>>e.g. does CVS have release tags? For example

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Hi Mike, >> The Bering-uClibc team will make a snapshot of the current tree and put >> the sources in a tarball in the File release area. > > Eric, > Please reconsider this decision. Tagging the release in cvs is easier. > > http://ximbiot.com/cvs/manual/cvs-1.11.21/cvs_4.html#SEC48 > If this is

[leaf-devel] CVS tags

Subject was: Re: [leaf-devel] Glitch in initrd backup when using alternative initrdfile On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 02:58, Eric Spakman wrote: > > How does one to go about building the buildenv for a specific release, > > e.g. does CVS have release tags? For example, if I wanted to have a > > buildenv

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 04:38, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > > I'll see if I can rsync our repository from > > Charles through my dial-up connection. > > That will take forever. If you want, I can burn a couple of CDs > and mail an initial copy of the archive to you. Once yo

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs ssh keys?

On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 10:46, Chad Carr wrote: > Is it possible to use a key and ssh-agent to access the sourceforge cvs > repository? Chad, Yes, as far as I know. Please let me know if these documents fail to answer your question(s). SF Site Docs E5. Guide to generating, posting and using SSH ke

[leaf-devel] cvs ssh keys?

Is it possible to use a key and ssh-agent to access the sourceforge cvs repository? Thanks, Chad --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defe

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Charles FYI here is the output of the rsync job, looks like it takes 8 seconds to complete (without changes) Maybe you want to upgrade your rsync server someday. From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 10:00:08 2004 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:00:01 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon) To

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Erich Titl wrote: Charles At 19:29 27.06.2004 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] charles]$ crontab -l # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - edit the master and reinstall. # (/tmp/crontab.29831 installed on Fri Aug 8 08:17:52 2003) # (Cron version -- $Id: crontab.c,v 2.13 1994/01/17 03:20

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Charles At 19:29 27.06.2004 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: >... >[EMAIL PROTECTED] charles]$ crontab -l ># DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - edit the master and reinstall. ># (/tmp/crontab.29831 installed on Fri Aug 8 08:17:52 2003) ># (Cron version -- $Id: crontab.c,v 2.13 1994/01/17 03:20:37 vixie Ex

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Erich Titl wrote: Mike At 18:56 27.06.2004, Mike Noyes wrote: On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 09:00, Erich Titl wrote: > Isn't there the possibility to use rsync at SF? The first download will be > horrible, but afterwards daily backups should not be that bad. Erich, SourceForge doesn't make a CVS repository

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Mike At 18:56 27.06.2004, Mike Noyes wrote: On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 09:00, Erich Titl wrote: > Isn't there the possibility to use rsync at SF? The first download will be > horrible, but afterwards daily backups should not be that bad. Erich, SourceForge doesn't make a CVS repository rsync service ava

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 04:38, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > > I'll see if I can rsync our repository from > > Charles through my dial-up connection. > > That will take forever. If you want, I can burn a couple of CDs > and mail an initial copy of the archive to you. Once yo

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 09:00, Erich Titl wrote: > Isn't there the possibility to use rsync at SF? The first download will be > horrible, but afterwards daily backups should not be that bad. Erich, SourceForge doesn't make a CVS repository rsync service available. It's a service that is often reque

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Hi everyone At 04:17 27.06.2004, K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote: Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 19:40 schrieb Mike Noyes: > On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 09:44, K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote: > > Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 18:27 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > > We should have multiple backups of our repository. My limited bandwid

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Mike Noyes wrote: On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 19:17, K.-P. KirchdÃrfer wrote: Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 19:40 schrieb Mike Noyes: > wget http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2 > Length: 959,993,540 [application/x-bzip2] Well, I need about three to four hours to downlo

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Am Sonntag, 27. Juni 2004 05:23 schrieb Mike Noyes: > On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 19:17, K.-P. KirchdÃrfer wrote: > > Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 19:40 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > > wget > > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2 Length: > > > 959,993,540 [application/x-bzip2] >

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 19:17, K.-P. KirchdÃrfer wrote: > Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 19:40 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > wget http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2 > > Length: 959,993,540 [application/x-bzip2] > > Well, I need about three to four hours to download it;

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 19:40 schrieb Mike Noyes: > On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 09:44, K.-P. KirchdÃrfer wrote: > > Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 18:27 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > > We should have multiple backups of our repository. My limited bandwidth > > > prevents me from downloading leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2.

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Mike Noyes wrote: > Charles makes our repository available for rsync. > > rsync rsync.leaf-project.org:: > leaf-cvsLEAF Project CVS Archives I have no idea how big the tarball is? K.-P., It is large. I'm not sure how big the tarball is (I decompress it as it's downloaded),

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 09:44, K.-P. KirchdÃrfer wrote: > Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 18:27 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > We should have multiple backups of our repository. My limited bandwidth > > prevents me from downloading leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2. Charles is the only > > project member I'm aware of that reg

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 18:27 schrieb Mike Noyes: > On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 08:40, K.-P. KirchdÃrfer wrote: > > Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > > Everyone, > > > How many of you periodically download our nightly repository? > > > > > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvst

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 08:40, K.-P. KirchdÃrfer wrote: > Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > Everyone, > > How many of you periodically download our nightly repository? > > > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2 > I'm not aware that a member of

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes: > Everyone, > How many of you periodically download our nightly repository? > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2 Mike; I'm not aware that a member of the Bering-uClibc team does it. Why do you ask? kp

[leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Everyone, How many of you periodically download our nightly repository? http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2 -- Mike Noyes http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs --

[leaf-devel] CVS update

Everyone, Yesterday I updated 'syncmail', and applied a patch to 'cvs_acls' that simplified 'avail'. Please let me know if you run into any problems. Thanks. -- Mike Noyes http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ http://sitedocs.sf.net/ http://ffl.sf.net/

[leaf-devel] CVS repository module update

Everyone, I made significant changes to our defined modules. See the cvs-commit message for details. CVSROOT modules,1.5,1.6 https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=1835246&forum_id=12138 -- Mike Noyes http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ http://sitedo

[leaf-devel] CVS repository update

Everyone, I had the SF staff do some minor restructuring of our doc/guides directory in cvs. I also updated the README in our toplevel with additional module information. [688809] CVS repository clean-up: leaf https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=21&aid=688809&group_id=1 README h

[leaf-devel] CVS repository update

Everyone, I just made some significant changes to our CVS repository. I defined modules for all of our releases/branches and packages. I gave global write access for all project members to the following trees: doc/docmanager doc/howto doc/man doc/ne

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 03:32, Greg Morgan wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > > That may be the cause, but I'd need the exact import command you used to > > The fatal captain's log from the history file: > cd /home/edrive/leaf/devel/dr_kludge/GilaMonster Greg, Is this a checked out cvs tree/module? Impo

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

Mike Noyes wrote: > On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 23:56, Greg Morgan wrote: > > > I followed the CVS document Mike Noyes wrote at > > http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9960&group_id=13751. > > Greg, > That may be the cause, but I'd need the exact import command you used to The fatal ca

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

Chad, Thanks for all your help with my CVS qustions. I think I have the hang of it now. Greg Morgan --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 23:56, Greg Morgan wrote: > I followed the CVS document Mike Noyes wrote at > http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9960&group_id=13751. > > I wound up with two problems. One I have two directories in my checkin. > Two, I must of fouled up something because I r

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 23:56, Greg Morgan wrote: > I followed the CVS document Mike Noyes wrote at > http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9960&group_id=13751. > > I wound up with two problems. One I have two directories in my checkin. > Two, I must of fouled up something because I r

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

I followed the CVS document Mike Noyes wrote at http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9960&group_id=13751. I wound up with two problems. One I have two directories in my checkin. Two, I must of fouled up something because I received a trace back. Does anyone see what I did wrong?

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 05:21, Greg Morgan wrote: > Is this correct? I understand you can do many things with CVS. I want > to checkin some of my stuff. Do I just want to think in directory > structure under my directory? > ..\devel\dr_kludge\thingtwo > ..\devel\dr_kludge\and > ..\devel\dr_kludge

[leaf-devel] CVS Question

Is this correct? I understand you can do many things with CVS. I want to checkin some of my stuff. Do I just want to think in directory structure under my directory? ..\devel\dr_kludge\thingtwo ..\devel\dr_kludge\and ..\devel\dr_kludge\thingone In other words, I don't need to think about tags

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree

On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 20:42, guitarlynn wrote: > I've been doing some thinking about a good way to setup the > LEAF src tree, as there is still nothing there. As I need to upload > my own src for a package binary and working on others, I need > somewhere to put it within the tree. My thoughts on

[Leaf-devel] CVS Mirror resource

For folks wanting to setup a mirror of the SourceForge site who don't have the bandwidth to download the 250 Meg (and growing) CVS tarball daily, I recently put an rsync mirror online. The system is hooked to a Cogent 100 MBit/s link, so bandwidth shouldn't be too much of an issue (although Cogen

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree

On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:11:13 -0500 "guitarlynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +packages +glibc-2.0 > > > +glibc-2.1 > > > +glibc-none > > > +binaries > > > > > > I believe the seperation of glibc within packages will avoid > > > confusion between p

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree

On Monday 26 August 2002 12:49, Mike Noyes wrote: > Lynn, > Thank you for opening this topic for discussion again. :-) > Remember I'm not a programmer when reading my comments below. No problem, as discussed many times over the last yearthis needs to be done! > > > +packages +glib

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree

On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 20:42, guitarlynn wrote: > I've been doing some thinking about a good way to setup the > LEAF src tree, as there is still nothing there. Lynn, Thank you for opening this topic for discussion again. :-) Remember I'm not a programmer when reading my comments below. > src

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree

On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 10:06, Vladimir I. wrote: > Actually WISP-Dist CFSLRP packages are not backwards compatible with LRP. Any > ideas about a good place for them? Vladimir, Anything release/branch specific should be in the release/branch trees. Example: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/view

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree

> src +bering > +dachstein > +oxygen > +packetfilter > +wisp-dist > +packages +glibc-2.0 > +glibc-2.1 > +glibc-none +glibc-2.2 For WISP-Dist ;) Actually WISP-Dist CFSLRP packages are not b

RE: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree

11:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree I've been doing some thinking about a good way to setup the LEAF src tree, as there is still nothing there. As I need to upload my own src for a package binary and working on others, I need somewhere to put it within the tre

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS structure ???

On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 15:50, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > [2] Since cvs does not retain group, mode nor ownership attributes, [1] > is further complicated and requires another kludge to correct directory > and files attributes. Michael, This should only be an issue when exporting for public distri

  1   2   >