On Thursday May 09 2002 01:20 pm, you interfaced in analog form:
THe *only* reason that you reboot linux is to change hardware or your
kernel. Unless all 3 of the printers use the same exact postscript
filter, you'll need to do more than just switch the printers, you'll
also have to use the
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 01:14:05PM -0400, Harry G wrote:
I am using Suse 7.3, and have to use 3 different printers (all
parrallel) depending on the job One HP Laserjet 6L, a Epson Stylus
Color 900, and a Okidata Microline 320 for multi-part forms. Would a
printer selector switche work well
Why not just set up different print queues for each printer? Does each have
its own parallel port? If so, it would be easy.
I would avoid mechanical printer switches if possible. I am not
sure what is available with automatic switches.
When you print from mozilla, you can change the printer
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 10:00:57AM -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:48:18PM -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
...
It's model BEFSR41 ver 2 from Linksys. There are indeed a lot of models,
so I'm not all that sure of features. I've installed two of these, though,
and they
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama!
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: KDE from scratch (source)
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Brian Witowski wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Brian Witowski wrote:
---stuff deleted---
,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/qt-3.0.3/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib
g++: /usr/lib/.libs/libsane.so: No such file or directory
Your answer is right here --^
That was my first guess, however:
Greetings,
On Thu, 9 May 2002, dep wrote:
http://computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0%2C10801%2C71003%2C00.html?nlid=AM
Gee... $15 Million in revenue is a Bad Thing(tm)??? Not the $18
Million they expected. What sort of P/E does the $15 mil represent? I
would have to say
They are a nuisance. They often are blamed (by the printer manufacturer) for
faulty printer behavior.
Joel
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 02:01:23PM -0400, Harry G wrote:
On Thursday May 09 2002 01:53 pm, Joel Hammer wrote:
Why not just set up different print queues for each printer? Does
each
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama!
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: KDE from scratch (source)
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Brian Witowski wrote:
---stuff deleted---
,--rpath
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Brian Witowski wrote:
THe interpretation *is* the solution. Create a symlink to fix the mess.
Or don't use KDE, whichever is easier :)
Are those my only options? Can't I do whichever is harder?
If you're feeling sado-masochistic, sure, have at it, and all that.
--
Greetings,
On Thu, 9 May 2002, dep wrote:
http://computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0%2C10801%2C71003%2C00.html?nlid=AM
Gee... $15 Million in revenue is a Bad Thing(tm)??? Not the $18
Million they expected. What sort of P/E does the $15 mil represent? I
would have to
Maybe it's time for Keith to get to work on his long-overdue
Skippy-Linux?
On Thursday 09 May 2002 11:33 am,dep wrote:
http://computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0%2C10801%2C71
003%2C00.html?nlid=AM
--
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd rather be sailing
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 02:48:50PM -0400, Jay Nugent wrote:
Greetings,
On Thu, 9 May 2002, dep wrote:
http://computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0%2C10801%2C71003%2C00.html?nlid=AM
Gee... $15 Million in revenue is a Bad Thing(tm)??? Not the $18
Million they expected.
Greetings,
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Gerry Doris wrote:
On Thu, 9 May 2002, dep wrote:
http://computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0%2C10801%2C71003%2C00.html?nlid=AM
Gee... $15 Million in revenue is a Bad Thing(tm)??? Not the $18
Million they expected. What sort of P/E does
It was at one time advised not to use electronic switches with laser
printers for risk of damaging them, but I don't know if this is still
valid or not.
I was on the Belkin site, and they still make mechanical switches, but
they are not IEEE compliant, which, I understand, is needed. They
Check out www.blackbox.com. At one time they had switches and spoolers
that could be controlled by keystrokes and were compliant.
Harry G wrote:
It was at one time advised not to use electronic switches with laser
printers for risk of damaging them, but I don't know if this is still
Thanks.
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:01:55PM -0500, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
Have you done anything with GnatBox systems, Bill. If so what are your
views on them?
This is the first I've hear of them so don't have any views.
My experience with LinkSys products has been
I went to their website, and asked to view the catalog by list. via a
link.
It returned:
Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80040e0c'
Command text was not set for the command object.
?
Think they would know better.
Harry G
PS: Thanks for the info. I will try manana.
On May 9 Gerry Doris was heard saying:
snip
-I didn't read the full context but if they predicted they would make $18M
-and they only made $15 then they were off their own projections by 16.7%
*** On the other hand it is ridiculous the system works this way:
After all they ** made ** $15M!
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Zoki wrote:
2
On May 9 Gerry Doris was heard saying:
snip
-I didn't read the full context but if they predicted they would make $18M
-and they only made $15 then they were off their own projections by 16.7%
*** On the other hand it is ridiculous the system works
On May 9 Kevin O'Gorman was heard saying:
snip
-I'm afraid this comment displays a lack of understanding. $18M wasn't
-profit, but income. They lost money, which means they spent more than
-the $18M in the same time period. That's negative earnings, which makes
*** I did not see it
On May 9 Gerry Doris was heard saying:
snip
-I didn't read the full context but if they predicted they would make
$18M -and they only made $15 then they were off their own projections
by 16.7%
*** On the other hand it is ridiculous the system works this way:
After all they ** made **
Don't know about belkin, I use a data switch from PI Manufacturing, made in
Taiwan, and works just fine with a HP 920, connectix quick clip, and a umax
scanner. It says nothing about being IEEE compliant.
On Thursday 09 May 2002 20:18, Harry G wrote:
It was at one time advised not to use
begin Gerry Doris's quote:
| No, I'm saying that shareholders generally expect the management of
| a company to meet their predictions at least for the next 3 months.
| If they don't then their stock will suffer. Some companies are
| known for being conservative. IBM is a case in point but
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Thursday 09 May 2002 19:13 pm, dep wrote:
fyi, we did a little interview with ransom love an hour or so ago;
it's up now:
Sorry, but I don't buy the 'tough market' as being the sole reason for their
demise. I still 'lurk' on the Caldera List
On Thu, 9 May 2002 19:13:19 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled informatively:
http://www.linuxandmain.com/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=57
==
LM getting the scoop! ;o)
Good job, dep!
Mike
--
He may look like an idiot and talk like an
What do you recommend then for a distro? I see - and this is based only on
my time in the newsgroups and mailing lists:
RH - the MS an AOL of the Linux world: breaks rules, doesn't maintain
standards,bleeding edge, doesn't have much of a clue. They made it popular
but lost it
SUSE - ?
I just installed caldera 3.1.1 a couple of nights ago to try it out, and
it seems solid. I was just starting to like it.
On Thu, 9 May 2002 19:26:32 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Bruce Marshall wrote:
I think they've lost it.
Indeed, i'll never
How about Elx. Anyone tried it? Seems extremely full featured and pretty
stable (prerelease). It is a bit on the bloated side.
On Thu, 09 May 2002 19:37:07 -0500
Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you recommend then for a distro? I see - and this is based
only on my time in
On Thursday 09 May 2002 19:13 pm, dep wrote:
fyi, we did a little interview with ransom love an hour or so ago;
it's up now:
Sorry, but I don't buy the 'tough market' as being the sole reason for
their demise. I still 'lurk' on the Caldera List and I cringe
everytime I see someone
Scribbling feverishly on May 09, dep managed to emit:
http://computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0%2C10801%2C71003%2C00.html?nlid=AM
The wrong person is leaving. It should be the CEO, not the CTO.
Kurt
--
Sex without love is an empty experience, but, as empty experiences go,
it's
Scribbling feverishly on May 09, Net Llama! managed to emit:
I almost take this announcement as an act of desperation, where they're
saying Hey remember us, we're trying to stop the bleeding, so please buy
from us.
It *is* an act of desperation.
Kurt
--
Patageometry, n.:
The study
Scribbling feverishly on May 09, Gerry Doris managed to emit:
The key is that they lost $0.28/share and they lost more than they
predicted just 3 months ago. To shareholders that indicates they don't
have control of their company. Many companies have been punished severely
in the market
On Thursday 09 May 2002 20:37 pm, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
What do you recommend then for a distro? I see - and this is based only on
my time in the newsgroups and mailing lists:
RH - the MS an AOL of the Linux world: breaks rules, doesn't maintain
standards,bleeding edge, doesn't have much
Scribbling feverishly on May 09, Jay Nugent managed to emit:
Greetings,
On Thu, 9 May 2002, dep wrote:
http://computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0%2C10801%2C71003%2C00.html?nlid=AM
Gee... $15 Million in revenue is a Bad Thing(tm)??? Not the $18
Million they expected.
Scribbling feverishly on May 09, dep managed to emit:
fyi, i've got a piece on it up now:
http://www.linuxandmain.com/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=56
Nicely done, dep.
Kurt
--
Be a better psychiatrist and the world will beat a psychopath to your
door.
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 02:22:28PM -0400, Tim Wunder wrote:
...
Hmmm... cheap=$180? For a simple router? Suppose the OP has an old PC
laying around doing nothing that costs $0, and a coupla 10 MB NICs that
cost $0. Is spending $180 still cheap?
It is if they're paying me $150/hour to do the
I wouldn't say that Redhat doesn't have a clue. They just like to make
standards, rather than follow them.
I wouldn't touch Debian with a 10ft stick. Way too many religious zealots.
Mandrake makes a nice desktop distro, or so i've heard, but its a wee
bit too unstable for my taste. I mean,
Got the SuSe 8.0 In. They have made some remarkable improvements. Gone is
the yukie rc.config (well, it is still there and you can use it or not).
They have almost made the entire switch to LSB with it. SHoulda been the
Distro COL made
--
Ben Duncan Phone (601)-355-2574 Fax
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 04:57:56PM -0400, dep wrote:
begin Net Llama!'s quote:
| Caldera has been doing 'silent' restructing for over a year now,
| and it hasn't shown a bit of progress in moving out of the red.
|
| I almost take this announcement as an act of desperation, where
| they're
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 09:22:15PM -0400, Kurt Wall wrote:
...
Bzzt! Thanks for playing. They've been restructuring since 5 months
after they went public. The CTO was not the problem, IMNSHO. The CEO is
the problem. Or, to paraphrase Bubba, It's the CEO, stupid! (Or, It's
the stupid CEO!).
IHMO,
Scribbling feverishly on May 09, Douglas J Hunley managed to emit:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just a quick te to announce that our RSS feed is being caried by The Linux
Homepage (www.linuxhomepage.com)!
Very cool!
Kurt
--
Malek's Law:
Any simple idea will be
Thanks. I'll put them on the list to check out. Darn, I thought I had
done this a couple of years ago when I went through all this and ended up
with Caldera! G.
Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Thursday 09 May 2002 20:37 pm, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
What do you recommend then for a distro? I see
Thanks for the input - comments inline.
Net Llama! wrote:
I wouldn't say that Redhat doesn't have a clue. They just like to make
standards, rather than follow them.
Hmm, not good if they break too many of them.
So, that brings me back to Redhat, which is what i've settled on.
RedHat
On Thu, 9 May 2002 20:57:08 -0400 (EDT) Gerry Doris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 09 May 2002 19:13 pm, dep wrote:
fyi, we did a little interview with ransom love an hour or so
ago; it's up now:
Sorry, but I don't buy the 'tough market' as being the sole reason
for their
Yes, SGI = silicon graphics. Their variant of Unix, Irix, used the XFS
filesystem, which has been ported to Linux. The open sourced version of
XFS includes a RH-7.2 install CD, which allows you to natively install
RH-7.2 on a XFS filesystem.
Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
Thanks for the input.
Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
Thanks for the input - comments inline
Net Llama! wrote:
So, that brings me back to Redhat, which is what i've settled on.
RedHat seems to be leaning more towards stability these days. I think
they might have realized that if they want to hold onto their market
share,
On Thu, 09 May 2002 18:38:40 -0700 Net Llama!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't say that Redhat doesn't have a clue. They just like to
make standards, rather than follow them.
I would call it doing it their own damn way. What they do
(sometimes reluctantly) becomes standard just because
On Thu, 9 May 2002 21:59:55 -0600
Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2002 18:38:40 -0700 Net Llama!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't touch Debian with a 10ft stick. Way too many religious
zealots.
Total agreement, but lots of people like it. It's really the
One thing I noticed was the omission of Ransom Love and the director of
marketing on the list of laid off employees. In the world of high
finance I guess incompetence is an asset. Another omission was that they
failed to mention that 4 months ago Caldera did a reverse stock split.
For every four
does win98 and win2k have the client?
Aaron Grewell wrote:
I've tried to do this a couple of different ways. The only way that has been
successful so far is to use pptp tunneling. You can either tunnel directly
to the server you want to login to, or set up the linux pptpd on your
51 matches
Mail list logo
