Martin Heiden wrote:
Bob,
on Friday, February 23, 2007 at 12:19 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote:
content
different content
This can then be CSS'd of course, in the normal way.
The important point though, is that the number of cells in a grid should
be restricted to an
Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
One of the (many) things I wish for is a tag. Something along
the lines of the following (made up as I go along, so don't nitpick too
much :-)):
content
different content
This can then be CSS'd of course, in the normal way.
<...>
(I can dream, ca
Barney Carroll wrote:
But at the end of the day, {display: table} is just as ridiculous as
div{display:inline} or span{display:block}. Besides, when I made
table-based designs I often found myself nesting tables within tables,
and I ended up with horribly deep code (a bit like Google ads, on
Thanks to all who responded. I must say that I basically agree with most
of what was said, but a few things still bother me, semantic-wise.
Firstly, doing it 'properly' could be seen as using the following:
#grid {display : table; }
#colalpha { width : 28em; display : table-cel
Following on from recent conversations about floats etc, we can
summarise by saying that we can have three basic choices:
1.
#grid {display : table}
#colalpha { width : 58%; padding-right :20px; display :
table-cell; }
#colbeta { width : 38%; b
I seem to be going through a spate of getting spam in a form on one of
my sites (the one in the link, below, actually.)
So I tried using PHP to randomly display an image and getting the form
user to input what it says.
I still get spam! I'm presuming that this is because the spammer will
w
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Designer wrote:
I'm going back to my original wishlist of yesterday:
Wouldn't it be nice if we could get browsers to interpret ^ (or
something) as meaning 'div id=' (and something else for 'class=').
Then we could have, xml style code, such
Dan Dorman wrote:
[snip]
Just because I feel or
is a better way to
specify a heading than , is it reasonable to expect a browser
maker to cater to my linguistic whim? And by extension, to anyone's
linguistic whim? Browsers don't handle any random tags, browsers work
with a previously defined s
Geoff Pack wrote:
Designer wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if we could get browsers to interpret ^ (or
something) as meaning 'div id=' (and something else for 'class=').
Then we could have, xml style code, such as:
<^pageborder>
<^content>
b
Mike Wilson wrote:
Home
About
Contact
...
Chuck Norris
Jack Bauer
This would tend to convey a page section (the side bar) that's been
divided into 3 smaller portions, hence the
Mordechai Peller wrote:
Designer wrote:
q:before {
content:'';
}
q:after{
content:'';
}
So why don't I see two sets of quotes in Firefox?
If you examen the two rules very carefully you'll notice that each one
has two single quotes and not one double quote; the
Christian Montoya wrote:
That's visual styling there, not semantic! I would do the following:
"I think Web Standards are excellent"
Ed Henderson
q:before {
content:'';
}
q:after{
content:'';
}
This will ensure that users only see one set of quotation marks (I think).
Amaz
Web Man Walking wrote:
Hello
I am looking to mark-up something of the like:
/"I think Web Standards are excellent"/
*Ed Henderson*
My first guess was:
I think Web Standards are excellent
Ed Henderson
Does anyone have any other ideas?
Regards
Ed Henderson
Since fails i
I know that this topic has dragged on a bit, but I am very interested in
the development of 'our' language and the implications of all the things
being discussed.
Interestingly, I note the proposition that is to be replaced with
in future versions of xhtml (2) :
{
hr Replaced By separato
Barney Carroll wrote:
@Designer:
separates text into individual blocks.
big [snip]
Regards,
Barney
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join
Barney Carroll wrote:
[snip]
What I believe you're getting at... Is that 'horizontal rule' in itself
does not 'mean' anything - it is off-putting because it is a tag whose
name signifies a visual symbol which signifies an abstract value. Far
better for all of us, I think, to have this repla
my opinion ;)
On 2/1/07, Milosz A. Lodowski - New Media Designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
How do you define "accessible" ?
pure text ?
Not fair. You picked these sites, so you have to define your criteria.
The ball is in your court to answer that question.
--
Duck ? Bob - I don't think so...
There is a large difference between the word "design/designer" and
"code/coder",
designer and design are connected with the pure art with a support of
usability - code - that's only accesibility...
but of course - that's onl
nal Design Expert
www.e-motionaldesign.com
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Montoya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Art and accessibility - my opinion ;)
On 2/1/07, Milosz A. Lodowski - New Media Designer <[EMAIL
Milosz A. Lodowski - New Media Designer wrote:
I'd like to present you the list of best100 e-motional designs,
we're waiting for your opinions about our idea and choice ;)
http://www.e-motionaldesign.com/blog/100-the-best-e-motional-websites-part-1-of-4/
Best Wishes
Milosz A. Lo
I'd like to present you the list of best100 e-motional designs,
we're waiting for your opinions about our idea and choice ;)
http://www.e-motionaldesign.com/blog/100-the-best-e-motional-websites-part-1-of-4/
Best Wishes
Milosz A. Lodowski
Art Director IceAge Design Squadron
Be our Ally, Hire our
Barney Carroll wrote:
[snip]
The notion merits consideration: These incredibly 'inaccessible'
services are some of the most incredibly accessed on the web.
The times, they are a'changing.
I've been observing (with some horror) the changing face of the web.
Ebay, Google etc, Blogs galore,
thew Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoth Milosz A. Lodowski - New Media Designer at 01/24/07 11:32...
>> But any design without art, feeling and emotions is trivial and boring
>
> We can be artistic and accessible, and need to prove it time and time
> again to d
We can be artistic and accessible, and need to prove it time and time
again to dispel the myth that "accessible is ugly". Artists and techies
can work together - I've done it before AND we were still talking to each
other at the end ;-)
--
Matthew Smith
Of course Matthew - You've got right
>> [...] Nothing bugs me more than a super-cool looking site that shows off the
>> ability of the artist who built it, yet does nothing for the idea, product
>> or service it promotes.
>> Art for art's sake is fantastic. Businesses need more.
>> Noah
But any design without art, feeling and
GALLAGHER Kevin S wrote:
I have a site which seems to work fine in Firefox and IE6 but heard (I
don't have IE7) that the navigation is not displaying correctly. Can
someone with IE7 confirm this or not?
http://www.snagedu.com/
Thanks,
Kevin S Gallagher
*
Hello All,
What's your general feeling about Adobe's CSS ADVISER?
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/communityengine/index.cfm?event=homepage&productId=1
Bob
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.o
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2007/01/13/30-dark-designs-you-shouldve-seen/
:-)
Best Wishes
Milosz A. Lodowski
Art Director IceAge Design Squadron
Be our Ally, Hire our Guns...: www.iceagedesign.co.uk
London
Visit my PriveFolio: www.lodowski.eu - Be my Guest!
Mobile contact: +44 079.23.388.90
Katrina wrote:
2) Language usage such as Latin as this is a long standing convention
in print and must be retained (thus not styled via CSS).
Example: Lorem ispum
I actually come across this situation from time to time and I have
ummed and ahhed over what the best thing to do is.
M
Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
Hello Andrew,
Does anyone know of any other
legitimate uses of these tags?
For the life of me I cannot think of one legitimate use for the element.
If it's bold then the reason is probably strong emphasis thus
should be used. Otherwise it should be m
Hello for All
Because I'm new here I'd like to introduce myself and say hallo for all ;)
I am the New Media Designer, the Art Director and also Freelancer with 7
years of exp. in multimedia, web and print design. I have got the skills of
illustrating, drawing, sketching and pa
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
That is a visual convention, so I'd relegate it to CSS and just style
them as spans (or even better, mark them up as links that jump to the
reference, and style the links).
They don't lose any meaning, in my opinion, if - when CSS is
off/unavailable - they're not visua
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Designer wrote:
I don't want to start the argument all over again, Patrick, but I had
occasion to use SUP recently so I wondered how you'd do it instead?
I presume you'd define it in CSS with a smaller font and bottom
padding, but it seems a bi
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
I'm still convinced that SUB and SUP are primarily presentational
http://www.mail-archive.com/wsg@webstandardsgroup.org/msg24851.html
so I wouldn't really want to include those.
P
I don't want to start the argument all over again, Patrick, but I had
occasion to use SUP r
My service provider sent the following out in the latest newsletter. I
was not aware of this, so in case any of you weren't aware either, I
include it here:
REGULATION ISSUE
From today, companies in the UK must include certain information on
their Web sites and in their e-mail footers or the
Charith De Silva wrote:
Hi all,
Can someone please explain me why firefox displays a space between
tables.
I tested the same pages with the IE but it works fine.
thank you.
Charith.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.o
Raena wrote:
On 12/7/06, *Designer* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
I am after a simple 'quote of the day' or 'word of the day' type thing
for a client. Naturally, I want it to be xhtml compliant, and easily
formatted by m
I am after a simple 'quote of the day' or 'word of the day' type thing
for a client. Naturally, I want it to be xhtml compliant, and easily
formatted by me.
My initial search hasn't produced anything worth having. Can anyone
recommend something?
Many thanks
--
Best Regards,
Bob McClelland
Dmitry Baranovskiy wrote:
Hi Sarah,
Because, semantically thinking, tags are not headers. And also you
could have more than 6 different weights.
best regards,
Dmitry Baranovskiy
On 07/11/2006, at 11:05 AM, Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing something, but why not use , , ,
etc
Barney Carroll wrote:
'The point'. Very interesting notion.
Presumably, sticking any kind of extra markup in is going to cause you
to have to put in as much attention, effort and typing (at least) as
putting in the space manually, and css can't yet select sub-element
'objects'. So seeing as y
Nick Roper wrote:
Hi Group,
A client has requested that the content on their site has two spaces
between the end of one sentence and the start of the next. We could do
it by using non-breaking spaces, but is there a better way of
achieving this - possibly with CSS?
Thanks in anticipation.
Trevor Boult wrote:
Hi All,
Just my penneth worth.
I have always said anything that needs a plugin is automaticaly
un-accessable.
Trevor.
(the following is NOT aimed at Trevor - I am merely illustrating a point)
I have always thought that anything which uses a browser is just a pain
in
Am I correct in thinking that styling the optgroup (and label) with CSS
simply doesn't work?
I am trying to get some vertical space around the label element, but so
far my expts have produced no effect whatsoever. I've googled this, but
only found a 2004 ref which seems a bit bleak. As it's
I've looked around for a stable solution which doesn't involve putting
, etc all over the content (that's presentational :-) ) and
can only come up with using the old tag (for strikeout):
s{
padding-right: 1em;
text-decoration : none;
}
then, blah blah.blah blah. It seems to work,
Chris Williams wrote:
This has clearly veered off topic, and I'm just waiting for a moderator
comment... :)
It's not really that complicated. Just look for a capital letter
following a period, pay attention to quoted strings, and Mr., Ms., etc.
and replace the intervening white space(s) with "
Whoops! Sorry - sent to wrong list!
Chris Williams wrote:
I have this problem, and I use " " and not " ".
I find that works, and I haven't seen the space at the beginning
problem. It seems that UA's can handle the at the end of the
line OK. I do this replacement with a simple regex in
Chris Williams wrote:
I have this problem, and I use " " and not " ".
I find that works, and I haven't seen the space at the beginning
problem. It seems that UA's can handle the at the end of the
line OK. I do this replacement with a simple regex in my PHP code.
HTH,
Chris
PS -- it is ver
Paul Collins wrote:
Hi all,
anyone know a good site/piece of software you can get to check your
whole site for validation errors? Would speed things up instead of
having to do them one at a time. Another bonus would be one that
accepts password information on protected sites.
Cheers
Paul
Justin Carter wrote:
On 9/23/06, Christian Heilmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When it comes down to it, font
resizers are fancy toys as an excuse for a design that has too small
fonts from the start.
I do agree, although on some occassions it's also a request from a
client where they have an
In the recent 'Links for light reading', the author of:
http://www.jakpsatweb.cz/css/css-vertical-center-solution.html
Uses the following:
#outer {height: 400px; overflow: hidden; position: relative;}
#outer[id] {display: table; position: static;}
and I don't understand the [id] bit. I've goo
Tony Crockford wrote:
Hmmm...
I think we could take this too far.
if html contains head and body, why cant body contain header, content
and footer
yes they are positional.
but there has to be some structural semantics as well surely? (we
accept that head comes before body...)
we also ac
Elliot Schoemaker wrote: [snipped]
Has this become a philosophical discussion yet? I quite like the idea
of such a topic.
- Elliot
OK, so how far do we take this thinking on semantics etc. For example,
many people use a div called 'header'. Suppose I decide to put this at
the bottom?!!!
Matthew Pennell wrote:
If all you're trying to do is indent the first line of each paragraph,
you don't need to use :first-line at all.
#description p { text-indent: 3em; }
Amazing! I'd have expected that to indent the whole paragraph!
Thanks Matthew, and to all others who responded.
--
Best
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Maybe it's philosophical hairsplitting, but "indent" still describes
the visual effect you're trying to achieve, rather than being a name
describing either the function or a characteristic of the content
itself. IMHO "first" falls under that second category (it's an
att
Hello everyone,
I think I'm cracking up!
I'm trying to use:
#description p:first-line { margin-left : 3em; }
and it refuses to take any notice of me! However, if I use:
#description p:first-line { color : #f00; } that works fine.
Can anyone shed any light on this? The full CS
Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
Designer wrote:
> Or, has anyone got any other brilliant ideas to solve this?
How about adding/changing a border weight or style around that .event date
cell or adding an overline-underline on the date number itself on the print
style sheet so you don
Thanks to all who replied.
Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
How about adding/changing a border weight or style around that .event date
cell or adding an overline-underline on the date number itself on the print
style sheet so you don't have to rely on a color? This should circumvent the
problem
Hi Listees,
I have a one year calendar, where each day is a table cell. I have CSS
and php controlling the visual presentation of it. If a day is
'booked' it is assigned to be an event and shows up via a CSS class thus:
.event {
color: #666;
background-color: #666;
etc
}
in other
Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
. . . lot's of sensible stuff, as indeed do many others. My point about
Opera's zoom is mainly concerned with being able to make the graphics
expand at the same rate as the textual matter. This relationship has
always been a problem to me, as I find the text growing
Townson, Chris wrote:
... you also cannot _resize_ text which is represented using graphics.
Unless you use opera, of course!
One of my bete noires is sites which break when the text is resized a couple of
"notches" up. I see this _so_ often, and it irks me.
Again, the zoom feature of Opera
Tony Crockford wrote:
Designer wrote:
No matter which way you look at it, it doesn't make sense.
what doesn't make sense is why you would use a strict doctype for
pages that are included in a frameset?
I'm just banging my head against the wall here! The reason I'd use a
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Designer wrote:
The 'problem' is that you can use a strict xhtml frameset AND xhtml
files and that's OK with the W3C recommendations - so why on earth
have they done away with one of frames main uses/advantages, i.e.,
targetting one or more of the fra
Tony Crockford wrote:
but I'm struggling to understand the problem.
the framed pages have *no* doctype - what would make them "strict"?
and why, when they are part of a frameset would you try and validate
them against a strict DTD?
Who said the framed pages have no doctype? They do if you w
Tony Crockford wrote:
Eh?
if you use the frameset DTD then target is valid.
you can't use frames in a valid way without the frameset DTD, so what
are you talking about?
time for me to drop out of this thread in sheer frustration.
;o)
Hi Tony,
AFAIK, the files that are used to make up the
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
Sometimes even web standards can be wrong. I do not think this discussion is
so much about personal preference as it is about the question whether this
particular web standard is correct or not. People who decide on Web
Standards can make mistakes. That's
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
Now that websites are moving more towards application style, they should
really behave like applications as we are accustomed to. And a fact is that
applications require pop-up windows at certain stages. Mostly when
information is provided that falls outsi
Christian Heilmann wrote:
On 8/14/06, Designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Christian Heilmann wrote:
> For framesets, where it is a necessity you have XHTML Frameset as the
> Doctype.
>
Is there something I'm missing here? If you make a frameset, the pages
which constitute t
Christian Heilmann wrote:
For framesets, where it is a necessity you have XHTML Frameset as the
Doctype.
Is there something I'm missing here? If you make a frameset, the pages
which constitute the actual frames are not using a frameset doctype, so
the problem of validity is the same as any o
Paul Novitski wrote:
At 11:09 AM 8/11/2006, Designer wrote:
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Hi all :o)
Just thought I'd throw a bit of code out there and see if anyone
thinks it's useful..
Unobtrusive Semantic Branding
http://www.grafx.com.au/dik/branding.html
Yes, it's interesting
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Hi all :o)
Just thought I'd throw a bit of code out there and see if anyone
thinks it's useful..
Unobtrusive Semantic Branding
http://www.grafx.com.au/dik/branding.html
Yes, it's interesting - but is there an advantage over pure CSS? see
[1]. It seems simple, bu
CK wrote:
Hi,
Good example, all the code groks, except this:
_width : expression(document.body.clientWidth >748? "750px": "auto" );
Would you shed some site on this rule, is this part of CSS 3?
Return True,
CK
Principal/Designer/Programmer -Bushidodeep
www.bushidode
, could
someone provide examples of standards based retro-fitted table design?
It is hoped seeing clean semantic code and CSS used with low-bandwidth
tables, will inspire greater confidence in CSS being used solely for
positioning and styling.
Return True,
CK
Principal/Designer/Programmer
I have been looking at ways to overcome the IE problem of producing
weeny (unreadable) text on em-based sites when a small text-size is
selected in the browser, and I was surprised how little I found.
I did find Matt Round's work on www.malevolent.com but I'm wondering if
anyone has improved o
Nick Cowie wrote:
It is a little radical but you could use
http://nickcowie.com/xtras/fontsize4.js to form the basis of a script
that changes font size based on browser window width, so users get one
version of the website at 800px wide screens and another on 1000px
wide screens.
Hi Nick,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob,
I know that you didn't intend any offence, and I appreciate that I did
not give the answer that the poster was hoping for, but do I need to
remind everyone of the title of this forum?
As long as we fail to implement existing standards such as
border-radius, IE can le
TuteC wrote:
Hello everyone. I have a web page that I use as a public favorites. I
have around a hundred different links to outside sites, and I use the
target=blank for each one. I searched at W3schools for a way to making
all the links in the page target=blank with CSS but couldn´t find one.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None of these solutions have much to do with semantics, and none of them
appear to be fool-proof.
If at all possible, stick with the standards - CSS3 includes a
declaration for rounded corners, which has been supported by Mozilla for
a long time.
Mike
-
Good idea
Ted Drake wrote:
For anyone that just joined this list. If Felix was starting to sound
reasonable, please take some time to read Eric Meyer, the W3C, Zeldman.com,
simplebits.com, and many other sites that accurately describe semantic
markup.
and, whilst you're reading Zeldman, take note of the
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Gaspar! Nice solution! Cleanest yet!
Have to say - I'm not a fan of Bob's approach. Yes, tables would solve
a lot of the problems neatly. But sorry, it's simply not tabular data
and come re-design time, tables simly don't have the flexibility of
semantics. Who knows, my
Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
<...> NO hacks and dead simple!<...>
Are you sure?
Regards,
Rimantas
--
http://rimantas.com/
Hey Rimantas, I'm not sure of /anything/! :-)
I do know that it's simple, and I do know that there are no special
hacks for IE, e.g.
Perhaps you could expand
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Pretty ugly - lots of FF v IE hacks but if anyone can improve this,
I'd love it!
R :o)
Sorry to sound anarchic, but sometimes you just have to step back and
ask: "why am I doing all this when there is a simple ( and robust) way?"
In this case, you must wrestle with
pepelsbey wrote:
I know this may sound stupid and dumb but is there a tag or something
that
you would use instead of an Just asking as it comes up as a
warning when I valiadate a page im coding at the moment.
A method suggested to me by Bert Doorn seems excellent, and is very simple:
Tony Crockford wrote:
I'd say:
.imagerow a{
text-decoration: none;
}
would do it.
(in this specific instance)
given that the line you see is the underline for the link that
encompasses all your images.
Hi Tony,
What a fine chap you are! Worked a treat! Thank you. :-)
--
Best Regar
Dear Listees,
I have a number of thumbnail images in a div, presented as three rows.
(see [1] for example)
My problem is that, in IE, I get a small horizontal line appearing in
the gap between the images. Someone told me ages ago that the trick was
to remove all whitespace between the lines
Jan Brasna wrote:
I think the ball is on the side of browser vendors. This should be
UI/UA thing, not a job for the website itself.
Absolutely! And lets add a page-zoom (Like Opera) as a must for ALL
browsers . . .
--
Best Regards,
Bob McClelland
Cornwall (UK)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
Tom Livingston wrote:
On 6/10/06 4:50 AM, "Designer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am I cracking up?
Is it better now?
http://66.155.251.18/mlinc.com/test/index2.html
[thanks Francky]
Seems fine now!
--
Best Regards,
Bob McClelland
Cornwall (UK)
www.gwelanmo
Lea de Groot wrote:
Designer wrote:
The way the hosting company offer to overcome this is to wrap the
whole thing in a frameset, and indeed it works, except that every
page appears as www.kernowimages.com and you can't get to 'view
source' or bookmark. It's a mess, and
Dear Listees,
I hope this is not OT, but I have a question about domain displays in
the UA.
The folk who I use to handle my domains do it in a way that displays the
real location of the site in the browser address bar. So, if I put
www.kernowimages.com in the address bar, it gets to the right
Tom Livingston wrote:
On 6/9/06 1:29 PM, "Designer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry Tom, but the layout doesn't fit in IE6 at 1024 by 768. (WinXP).
At least, not on my machine.
A little more info please. What doesn't fit? I just checked on mine and it
Ryan Moore wrote:
I am having a real problem with the this mark up.
.featured_listing {
clear:both;
display:block;
margin:0 0 1.5em 0;
}
.featured_image {
height:158px;
width:240px;
float:left;
}
.featured_listings_details {
clear:none;
margin:0;
list-style:none;
padding:0;
}
.f
Felix Miata wrote:
All you're really doing is trying to guarantee your visitor doesn't get
to see his preferred font-family.
Apart from the fact that in the real world most users don't have a
'preferred font family', I (for one) want to be educated, inspired etc
when I look at sites, I don't
Tom Livingston wrote:
Hello list,
I am playing with a variation of Mike Purvis' jello layout (a variation for
me anyway - you may have seen/done this) to make the entire layout scale
proportionally (as opposed to just allowing for the text to get
bigger/smaller).
Can you take a peek - beat on i
David Hucklesby wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:05:35 +0100, Designer wrote:
[...] I have a site with the potential to print out some thirty
different pages, with each printout length between 1 page and 4. Each
page has small illustrations scattered unevenly amongst the text, and
I'm fi
Dear listers,
Is there anyone out there with experience of avoiding page breaks in
daft places? I have a site with the potential to print out some thirty
different pages, with each printout length between 1 page and 4. Each
page has small illustrations scattered unevenly amongst the text, an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They do come into it if you print things any other way - many users
don't trust 'print links' for various reasons, and the appearance of the
full page is not exactly great if all frames are printed on one page -
scroll bars aren't very useful on paper!
Mike
Fair point M
Donna Jones wrote:
you know what, i looked at Curlews in IE6 and it was perfect. I
noticed an option I'd never noticed before, the option to "print
selected frame" maybe that's a clue that will help. the issue is
w/ the frames, somehow, maybe.
Donna
P.S. Forgot to say : the frames are
Donna Jones wrote:
Hi Bob:
I am still battling with print style sheets -
In particular, I have several property descriptions on the holiday
site, [1], and I'm failing to get a decent print out. Some are OK,
some are awful, and I can't see what the difference is. If you go to
the site, p
Ryan Moore wrote:
I am having a real problem with the this mark up.
.featured_listing {
clear:both;
display:block;
margin:0 0 1.5em 0;
}
.featured_image {
height:158px;
width:240px;
float:left;
}
.featured_listings_details {
clear:none;
margin:0;
list-style:none;
padding:0;
}
.f
Bruce wrote:
Yes, it isn't perfect or done yet but is in process:
http://66.118.191.85/~websterk/index.php
Thanks
Bruce Prochnau
When I print to acrobat distiller, the pdf is nothing like the web
site! I wouldn't expect it to be actually, unless I'd provided a print
style sheet. Did I mis
Designer wrote:
I am still battling with print style sheets -
In particular, I have several property descriptions on the holiday
site, [1], and I'm failing to get a decent print out. Some are OK,
some are awful, and I can't see what the difference is. If you go to
the site, pic
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
