s the
Knoppix setup.
-Krishna
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Krishna Murphy wrote:
FYI, I now have an icon for partition 2 (which is NTFS) and it's there,
but it was unable to recognize the partition type for partition 4
(extended), puts an icon for it on the desktop and ignores the partition 5
a
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Krishna Murphy wrote:
Jim-
I was using an xterm. Since then, I have moved to a new workstation and
made a new dhcpd.conf entry for it; I now have the right value in $DISPLAY
- but still it doesn't work. I just installed the package from:
http://ltsp.mirrors.tds.ne
6.deb
and I'm hopeful that will do the trick. I really need to get this drive
mounted and ~200 GB of data moved to the server...
-Krishna
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
Krishna Murphy wrote:
> Well, someone reconfigured the server and killed FUSE, among other things.
&g
Well, someone reconfigured the server and killed FUSE, among other things.
I reinstalled that, got the fuse group back as it was, but I'm hoping for
a clue from the group as to what needs doing to get the $DISPLAY set right.
-Krishna
-
Dear All:
Interesting discussion! Thanks for the food for thought. My $0.02 worth is
inserted below...
Yours Truly!
Krishna
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Cristi Mitrana wrote:
> On 9/7/06, Fred Clewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi, I'm a LTSP and DHCP noob, and need to understand how I shoul
Steve-
I recommend you isolate the LTSP network again; shielding it with a small
router that has internal DHCP, set to disabled, will most likely do it.
Then you can reach your other systems (e.g. file storage servers) without
having DHCP battles. You won't be able to get LTSP going without its
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Ken Cobler wrote:
> Krishna Murphy wrote:
>> Devraj, Ken, et. al.-
>>
>> I have the same challenge, but I'm utterly confident that QuickBooks will
>> NOT run under Wine - or any other such program. So I'm preparing to
>> install Win
Devraj, Ken, et. al.-
I have the same challenge, but I'm utterly confident that QuickBooks will
NOT run under Wine - or any other such program. So I'm preparing to
install Windows Server 2003 as a virtual machine, then QB on it. My plan
is to allow LTSP users, and perhaps other LAN clients, to
Joe-
I noticed that you have IP set to 100.100.100.254, which is a public
address; seems like it might have been intended to be 10.100.100.254 in
the private b-class space. Maybe it's trying to reach out to someone's
address out there in the "real world"...
-Krishna
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Joe A
You can assign the SAME address every time; see the wiki for how to use
the configuration where it recognizes the MAC address and sets the
parameters (screen size, video driver, IP address) identically on every
boot cycle.
-Krishna
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
On Wed, August 9, 2
Have you tried more than one keyboard? Sometimes one will not work in a
particular system for no especially good reason...
-Krishna
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Gentgeen wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:49:59 -0400
Gentgeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Well, I found an updated BIOS for my system. I
Sudev-
I think that's the consensus; besides, with terminal hardware selling for
~$5 on eBay, it's not worth messing with systems that old.
-Krishna
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Sudev Barar wrote:
> On Wed, July 19, 2006 5:21 am, Andrea Reale wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > For my first message on this mailing
ement out so it does
not conflict with the "use-host-decl-names on;" statement
required for the MAC- based entries.
Thanks for your help!
-Krishna
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:
Am Montag, den 17.07.2006, 10:54 -0400 schrieb Krishna Murphy:
>
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:
Am Montag, den 17.07.2006, 16:15 -0400 schrieb Krishna Murphy:
> Anselm-
>
> I've had success in some (not necessarily all) situations running two DHCP
> servers with one handing IPs to general-purpose PCs in one range (>
Anselm-
I've had success in some (not necessarily all) situations running two DHCP
servers with one handing IPs to general-purpose PCs in one range (>.99 in
the subnet 192.168.1) and the other recognizing specific MAC addresses and
giving back a specific host name's IP (<.100 and thus preparing
Hey-
It appears that I need to have two DHCP servers running on one sub-net.
Apparently this causes a conflict with one in particular (inside a router
provided by an ISP) and the DHCP3 server under Debian that I'm using to
identify the workstations (using "use-host-decl-names on;" to make it so
Chris-
Is that image placed somewhere on the web such that others can
find and download it? I think that would be a nice contribution if you you
can do it!
-Krishna
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Chris Fanning wrote:
Hi Krishna,
> Is there a big disadvantage to running the SERVER in a vmware environme
Hey-
Does NAS not work with LTSP, then?
-Krishna
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Petre Scheie wrote:
Scott Balneaves wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 10:19:06PM +0300, Veli-Matti Lintu wrote:
>> pe, 2006-07-14 kello 09:57 -0500, Scott Balneaves kirjoitti:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> The problem is, ESD itself ca
FYI--
I downloaded the vmware server (complete), and signed up for 100 free
license numbers - that was all easy. Now, installing it under Winders...
Using XP Pro 2002 (SP2), a 1.9 GHz Pentium-4 and 1.5 GB RAM:
1) Be prepared to WAIT - it's a big download (15 minutes over a T-1, given
the rest
Is there a big disadvantage to running the SERVER in a vmware environment?
It might be good to have a pre-packaged setup in v-machine that could be
downloaded and used for initial testing, prior to actual deployment. There
are of course some penalties for using anything that way, but having ALL
Metal Gear-
I see "get-lease-hostnames" in there, along with MAC addresses and fixed
IP addresses being assigned to those particular machines. I think you
might want to try "use-host-decl-names" - which is not compatible with
"get-lease-hostnames", from what I've seen on the wiki.
-Krishna
O
Ty-
Check the ownership and permissions on /dev/fuse -- see the discussion at:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ltsp-discuss&m=115068567409004&w=2
There are other things that can go wrong, but that's a biggee...
-Krishna
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Ty Debelser wrote:
> I am new to the list. Thanks Ji
Edd-
If it was me, I'd opt for the RAM, or a dual-core Opteron if you can
afford it. The RAID would only give you a crash-survival ability; at that
level, you don't get the extra speed of RAID-5 and you lose ALL the extra
space on the second drive (rather than only a third of it.)
-Krishna
On
Kemas-
I'm planning to use virtual machines on the server where LTSP is being
served (my "big gun" server) to do things that I've worked on in another
environment. See the Linux Journal lead article from April or May for a
summary of many of the options. Don't know if that would serve your
pur
Edd-
Check your X config; I think that's where it starts your X session.
Alternatively, try changing the SCREEN_01 = to say "shell" and debug at
the client command line.
-Krishna
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Edrich de Lange wrote:
Hi
ive now gotten a test server running, and I seem to be stuck
my cli
Damien-
It worked.
-Krishna
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Damien Hull wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to mak
Yep, that's it.
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Ben Green wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:48:34 +0100, Krishna Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Edrich-
> Have you looked at http://thinstation.org/ for the Linux? There's also a
> Linux boot project that may be of some us
Edrich-
Have you looked at http://thinstation.org/ for the Linux? There's also a
Linux boot project that may be of some use (name escapes me, maybe linboot
or something like that.) What specifically are you looking for as far as
design assistance?
-Krishna
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Edrich de Lange
Hey-
I think I saw a posting or an FAQ (or something) that said one could use
virtual users (e.g. those associated with a mail server) instead of "real"
linux users for purposes of logging in to LTSP, tracking a home directory,
and all the rest. Anybody got a hot tip on how to use an existing M
Scott, et. al.-
Could you recommend where to look in the source for LocalDev stuff?
Especially as it relates to the lts.conf file?
-Krishna
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Scott Balneaves wrote:
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 01:06:26PM +0200, Frank Bergmann wrote:
> Local dev with ltspfs is working for us very
Frank, et. al.-
1) How can one tell if xdmcp is being used? I think I am, but...
2) Do you have any local hard drives, and if so, how are they specified?
-Krishna
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Frank Bergmann wrote:
Local dev with ltspfs is working for us very well if the clients are
connected to the serv
> Alfred Nutile wrote:
>> What if it only shows ws001 and not the :0? I am having some trouble
>> getting KDM to recognize each terminal and apply per terminal log in
>> settings as you mentioned on another site.
>> Thought this may be why?
>>
>
> if 'echo $DISPLAY' is showing just 'ws001', withou
ction.
> It sounds like the terminal doesn't know it's own hostname.
I doubt you can check this - no shell to type in a command at.
> Tried that too
> Also i'v haded the computer name and ip to /etc/hosts
Do you mean /etc/hosts.allow? That's the place to do that, AFAI
Daniel-
Have you got 10.0.150.47 assigned to a workstation in your dhcpd.conf?
That wkstn would then have a section in your lts.conf - but it looks like
it's not getting that far, you're unable to nfs-mount the /opt/ltsp/i386
directory where the wkstn gets all its' goodies.
-Krishna
On Thu, 2
Dan, Jim, et. al:
I also have noted these two(?) things. Hope that can addressed!
-Krishna
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Daniel Mealha Cabrita wrote:
hi Jim, folks..
Apparently there's a bug in the parser routines (etc/lts.conf). I've
experienced random problems while booting the terminals wh
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
> Look at your /etc/init.d/sysklogd script, and see how it handles options.
> for Ubuntu and debian systems, there's a line that starts with 'SYSLOGD='
> and the options follow it. And, there's a comment above, showing how to
> turn on remote logging.
>
>
Vidya-
Not sure which blue screen you mean - surely not the blue "Windows screen
of death!" Are you sure it's booting off a known good floppy with the
proper configuration for that system?
-Krishna
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Vidyaratha Kissoon wrote:
Hi all
I am using ltsp 4.0 on Mandriva 2005, all
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, David Heinzerling wrote:
> Plugins should be global by default. For settings, you can alter the
> prefs.js file for the default profile--though it will get overwritten on
> updates. On fedora and suse it is located at
> /usr/lib/firefox/defaults/profile
FYI-
/usr/share/fir
Dear SoNicx:
When I go to the clients' command line and try to set the password, it
doesn't know what "passwd" means. When I needed this for earlier debugging
usage, no one ever mentioned any such possibility - either in the list or
the online chat - so I think it's not set up to do that. I won
Jun 2006, Krishna Murphy wrote:
All-
I'm having trouble with Emacs21 finding its' fonts, which causes the error
message (for instance) "Warning: Cannot convert string
"-*-helvetica-medium-r-*--*-120-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1" to type FontStruct" and
makes the stuff I'm
All-
I'm having trouble with Emacs21 finding its' fonts, which causes the error
message (for instance) "Warning: Cannot convert string
"-*-helvetica-medium-r-*--*-120-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1" to type FontStruct" and
makes the stuff I'm editing into empty rectangles. The stuff I've found
researching
Dear Kid:
In your lts.conf you've got ws001 instead of ws100 (which what your log
file indicates it should be), for one thing.
-Krishna
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Linux Kid wrote:
Dear all folks
I am using ltsp on RHEL#4. ES.
my video card configuration is
cat /etc/sysconfig/hwconf |grep VIDEO
--
Paul-
Try putting the cursor in front of the "rdesktop..." and hitting enter,
then putting in shell for that entry, and finally making a SCREEN_03 =
line for the rdesktop entry. If it then defaults to rdesktop, we'll know
it's likely something about that, but if it defaults to #2 again... I hav
Jan-
I recommend AGAINST using the server for a terminal - not because it can't
be done, but SO many others with years of experience in the field are so
emphatic about it. You can get a nice terminal-serving system (the client,
not the server) out of virtually any old PC handy, or pick up somet
I am a bit confused as to why the
same syslog setup
for under fc5 does not work for FC4
Under ltsp 4.1/FC4 I get no dmesg type output, while with ltsp4.2/FC5, I do.
Any hints?
Thanks in advance!
Jim McQuillan wrote:
> On Mon, June 19, 2006 10:23 am, Krishna Murphy wrote:
>
>
Radek-
Try copying down the modelines used (from the X log file) when it's booted
to local Linux; I'm sure I saw something that said you could supply them
directly in LTSP, rather than depending on the driver and config settings
to calculate them.
-Krishna
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Rados?aw Burszt
distro seems to have a different place to specify that option.
>
> Jim McQuillan
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Sat, June 17, 2006 11:41 pm, Krishna Murphy wrote:
> > Hey-
> >
> > I've poked around a good bit on the local system and not found what I'm
> >
"' >/etc/udev/rules.d/45-fuse.rules
For Fedora and CentOS, I believe it would be the same rule in
/etc/udev/rules.d/40-fuse.rules - but that's not tested by me.
-Krishna
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Krishna Murphy wrote:
John-
I'm having some similar trouble, and I've come
David-
Not sure about this, but it looks like the X stuff in LTSP changed between
3.0 and 4.2, and your modeline isn't what it needs any more. If you can
somehow boot a Knoppix or Ubuntu live disk on crow-apm, take a look at
what it puts in X logfile and see if you can apply that to this situat
wrong for me, now, but I have to
stop everything else if I'm going to fix it, and it's not worth it yet.
-Krishna
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Krishna Murphy wrote:
Tim-
I had noted the same difference on my setup, but making that change didn't
do any good. I since switched it back, an
Hey-
I've poked around a good bit on the local system and not found what I'm
looking for (the stuff that goes flying by when the workstation is in the
process of booting up.) Anybody know where to direct me to find the dmesg-
equivalent file? I've seen some interesting-looking stuff there, and
Hey-
I don't think anyone will be able to help much with the information
provided so far. Perhaps you could start with a copy of your entire
dhcp.conf and some additional detail about the workstation (especially
what LAN card/chip is used, etc.)
-Krishna
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Metal Gear wrote:
Jim-
You're right, there was a "range" statement left over in my dhcp.conf from
the past when I was (unwisely) doing DHCP with both a pool of addresses
and specific MAC addresses. I had picked up on the need to comment out the
"get-lease-hostnames true;" line when using
"use-host-dec
Stefan-
I have M7VIG-400 motherboard with a VIA chipset video up as a terminal on
LTSP-4.2, and it took not only specifying the VIA driver, but also setting
limits on sync rates (based on my monitor's capacity) to force correct
calculation of the "modelines". I think that driver's a little bugg
Tim-
I had noted the same difference on my setup, but making that change didn't
do any good. I since switched it back, and as you said, "it just decided
to work" when I made the change to a different version of FUSE. It does
seem like the switch to a local terminal helps - watching the response
FYI-
I had many similar problems on my setup here. It's working pretty well now
so I thought I'd summarize what I found, for what it's worth.
1) I'm running Debian stable on the server, and LTSP 4.2.
2) Did everything on the check list at:
http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/LTSP-42-LocalD
FYI, my router will do that if the DHCP server on the server doesn't give
it an address first. But I'm pretty sure my setup is similar to Joey's and
I have seen addresses assigned that were not specified in the dhcpd.conf.
-Krishna
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
Joey,
There's nothi
I take it back! When I logged in and tried it again, suddenly I had the
device showing on my desktop. Not that I hadn't tried that before, as a
means of getting changes to "take" - but maybe it's a third time=charmed.
-Krishna
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Krishna Murphy wrote:
Sco
Scott, et. al.:
I have the same problem on the FIRST attempt to use a device. I plug in a
USB key, look in the (wkstn) /etc/fstab/ and see it mounted as a SCSI device:
/dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 /tmp/drives/Removable_Device_483_Mb
auto rw,noatime 0 0
It's also there as a CD drive,
Alistair-
The most important part of the terminal (for initial booting purposes) is
the NIC; what hardware is in it? What options are in the bios, if any is
there (since it apparently runs NT locally)?
-Krishna
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Alistair Crust wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 07:50 -0400, [EMAI
Alistair-
I have a Geode 1750 processor on a M7VIG-400 motherboard, which has PXE
boot options. I had a bit of trouble getting it going. What I had to do,
mainly, was set some X parameters for the video. What motherboard/video
are you using?
-Krishna
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Alistair Crust wrote:
As I mentioned elsewhere, I was mistaken - this was 10.0, not 10.1.
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 02 June 2006 23:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I hired a fellow to help me when I started this project who had been
> successful at installing LTSP (and a LOT of other thing
at we have been
able to easily integrate it in.
-Paul
--
Paul VanGundy
Director of Information Technology
Epping School District
P: 603.679.5472
F: 603.679.2966
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #398783
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kr
1 May 2006, Krishna Murphy wrote:
In addition to the ownership trouble, and more importantly, is the fact that
even when the ownership is root.fuse with 660 permissions - it still fails to
work! In fact, the problem greatly resembles that described in the post
(unfortunately, without solution) at:
Scott-
I'm with you, that's a pretty exciting project to be part of; maybe I'll
have something to contribute someday. Meanwhile, much as it pains me to
say so, LTSPFS is still not working for me. I went through all the check-
points in the wiki, no cigar. I'm thinking maybe it's time to rip it
Hear, Hear!
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Andrew & Gabrielle wrote:
But then again, I won't even try to use BSD because they have demons for their
mascot, even though I have heard a lot of good things about it, and would
otherwise actually like to try it.
This is what they say about it, (http://www
Hey-
I'm looking at a situation in W. Africa where I think LTSP might be a good
fit for their needs. Ubuntu sounds like a good way to go for desktop stuff
- but I've heard concerns about using it as the server. What's the general
concensus, if any?
-Krishna
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Gudmund Areskou
Oops - It was SuSE 10.0, not 10.1; I understand there were some problems
with that one from the thread, earlier.
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Dave Cotton wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 00:57 -0400, Krishna Murphy wrote:
> Dave-
>
> I hired a fellow to help me when I started this project who
Dave-
I hired a fellow to help me when I started this project who had been
successful at installing LTSP (and a LOT of other things!) previously, and
I trust his instincts. He found the SuSE package manager cumbersome, and
the LTSP install didn't work; after a good long while of fiddling, there
FYI, I had enough trouble with SuSE 10.1 that I wiped the system clean and
started over with Debian stable. It's not perfect, either, but there were
enough troubles with SuSE to make it worth changing over. The hardware is
a quad-core 2GHz Opteron system with 1GB RAM/core and 1TB of RAID-5 SATA
John-
I'm having some similar trouble, and I've come to suspect the "udev rules"
for fuse need to be revised on my system. Can you post your set somehow?
It is a fairly complicated system/setup, and I'm not sure where mine are
wrong, but I get a /dev/fuse that is owned by root.root instead of
___
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Phil Davey wrote:
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Krishna Murphy wrote:
> Anyway, I saw that it was calculating the requested resolution (800x600)
> modeline incorrectly, indeed 85.1 Hz as detected. So I commented out the first
> two
://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ltsp-discuss&m=114480371431047&w=4
-Krishna
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Krishna Murphy wrote:
root.root
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
Krishna Murphy wrote:
News:
Well, I got everything (non-LTSPFS) working again, and met all of the
requirements in the troubleshooting
root.root
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
Krishna Murphy wrote:
> News:
>
> Well, I got everything (non-LTSPFS) working again, and met all of the
> requirements in the troubleshooting section of
> http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/LTSP-42-LocalDev
> and I
con fails when I try to open it.
Anybody got ideas?
-Krishna
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Krishna Murphy wrote:
Okay, here's the followup report. I do get an icon on the desktop now for
my legacy cd (when I insert a disk), but Konqueror shows it to be empty.
The web browsers Firefox and Epiphany, plus
again!
-Krishna
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Krishna Murphy wrote:
Scott-
Thanks! I seem not to have the FUSE module, despite having kernels
(2.6.16.1-ltsp-2 and 2.6.16.14) with greater numeric designation than the one
where FUSE was supposedly incorporated. I'm using Debian Sarge, so it may be
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Krishna Murphy wrote:
Scott-
Thanks! I seem not to have the FUSE module, despite having kernels
(2.6.16.1-ltsp-2 and 2.6.16.14) with greater numeric designation than the one
where FUSE was supposedly incorporated. I'm using Debian Sarge, so it may be
that I need to
rom
incompatible pointer type
/usr/src/modules/fuse/kernel/dir.c:1047: warning: initialization from
incompatible pointer type
Anybody got a tip as to what I flubbed?
-Krishna
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Scott Balneaves wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:57:34AM -0400, Krishna Murphy wrote:
Greeting
Phil-
Thanks! That helped. Is there a central repository[!] of the things one
can specify in the lts.conf which I can consult?
-Krishna
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Phil Davey wrote:
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Krishna Murphy wrote:
> Anyway, I saw that it was calculating the requested resolution (800x
Greetings-
I'm attempting to use the LTSPFS (built-in, they say, to ltsp4.2) from the
discussion at: http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/LtspFS
I'm running a later kernel than required (on both terminal and server, so
I should have the FUSE package for sure) and I think I should be in the
ult mode "720x400": 35.5 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 37.9 kHz,
85.0 Hz
(II) VIA(0): Modeline "720x400" 35.50 720 756 828 936 400 401 404 446
-hsync +vsync
(**) VIA(0): Default mode "640x400": 31.5 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 37.9 kHz,
85.1 Hz
(II) VIA(0): Modelin
e moment.
If only I could get the Local Drives and sound to work now...
-Krishna
On Sun, 28 May 2006, Krishna Murphy wrote:
Pete-
That line is in the section for my workstation. The monitor is working
correctly in all other uses, e.g. when I get on using VESA or another OS -
and none o
Stephan-
I think the trouble may be something from your prior installation of LTSP
- I am using version 4.2 (having never had an earlier version up) with the
VIA Rhine II as the client's interface chip (it's a VT6103, though.)
Do you have another interface card you could try? If it worked that
2006, Krishna Murphy wrote:
Denis-
Mine shows the same thing with ltsp4.2, every time I reboot or restart the
dhcp3 daemon. I think it's normal, correct behaviour.
-Krishna
On Sun, 28 May 2006, DenisG wrote:
Peter Billson a écrit :
> Denis,
> Did you change your dhcpd.conf f
Denis-
Mine shows the same thing with ltsp4.2, every time I reboot or restart the
dhcp3 daemon. I think it's normal, correct behaviour.
-Krishna
On Sun, 28 May 2006, DenisG wrote:
Peter Billson a écrit :
> Denis,
> Did you change your dhcpd.conf file so that root points to the 4.2 directory
Pete-
That line is in the section for my workstation. The monitor is working
correctly in all other uses, e.g. when I get on using VESA or another OS -
and none of my modes should be producing a vertical rate > 85 Hz, they're
all less than 80.
-Krishna
On Sun, 28 May 2006, Peter Billson wrote
hardware ethernet00:16:ec:1d:6c:49;
> fixed-address 192.168.1.79;
> }
>
> There are other parameters that can be added, but this will get you started.
>
> Petre
>
> Krishna Murphy wrote:
>
> > Dear Sudev:
> >
> > Than
7 May 2006, Petre Scheie wrote:
Put this in /etc/dhcpd.conf and then restart dhcpd:
host ws079 {
hardware ethernet00:16:ec:1d:6c:49;
fixed-address 192.168.1.79;
}
There are other parameters that can be added, but this will get you started.
Petre
Krishna Murphy wrote:
, Krishna Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim-
>
> Thanks! I'll put some ***s before my responses, below.
>
> -Krishna
>
Krishna an inline bottom posting would work much better ;-)
> I'm guessing that the specific workstation doesn't know it
Jim-
Thanks! I'll put some ***s before my responses, below.
-Krishna
I'm guessing that the specific workstation doesn't know it's own hostname. Or,
it doesn't match what you've put in [] in the lts.conf file.
***The logs on the server show that ws079 is getting logged in (see dhcpd.conf)
Hey, everyone-
I have LTSP-4.2 set up and running on a quad-core AMD Opteron (2GHz)
server with 1GB RAM per core. The base OS is Debian, and I've upgraded
Firefox to version 1.5.0.3 (32-bit.)
I have checked the stuff out on the wiki at:
http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/LTSP-42-LocalDe
91 matches
Mail list logo
