Bo Peng wrote:
for example i like to have personal web pages so i can run things like doxygen
generated docs for lyx,
sf.net provides ssh access, something even my web hosting company is
unwilling to provide. I just checked and it has doxygen pre-installed.
http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sit
Dear Jürgen and other LyX Developers,
Thank you very much for the kind welcome. Pursuant to your advice, I have
gone through and tried to develop my thoughts on a few features that I would
be excited to develop and add to LyX. Because of dummy-layouts and a few
other graphics I wasn't able to
> for example i like to have personal web pages so i can run things like doxygen
> generated docs for lyx,
sf.net provides ssh access, something even my web hosting company is
unwilling to provide. I just checked and it has doxygen pre-installed.
http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/SSH
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:23:26AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri writes:
>
> | On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:12:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >>
> >> Q: Is that a sun provided solaris?
> >
> | Yes, latest solaris 10 also bundles gcc:
> >
> | $ pkginfo | grep gcc
>
http://www.tuxfamily.org/en/main
pmwiki
git
svn
mail
but no trac and bugzilla
Cheers,
Charles
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
rgheck writes:
[...]
| Another possibility would be to see if the Brown LUG would want to do
| it. They've got space, and they're always looking for things to do for
| the FOSS community.
Now that is has been brought up, I think we should have a close look at
sourcef
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Pavel Sanda writes:
| Richard Heck wrote:
| I could provide server space for the web/wiki/ftp on my office server,
| probably.
Do you mean a server in your office or a server (in a server room) at
your office?
The server in my office: frege.brown.edu
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:23:26AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> But I must say if that is the most recent developemtn tools on solaris
> it is hugely useless as a development platform (and I don't belive it
> is).
I get the impression most C++ people on Solaris are using Sun Studio.
> The
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> >> If there are interest I'll try to setup a git tree that you can clone and
> >> set
> >> up as a git-svn tree. (I'll even write up a wiki page to explain briefly
> >> how
> >> to do that.)
> >
> | this is already done on git.or.cz, though not under our control (yet
lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
writes:
| | Please add some people also as administrator, how knows when you go
| | back
| | beneath your rock again ;)
>
| Well of course, we must plan for contengencies.
| But it is actually possible to get in contact with me... even if some
| persistence
Enrico Forestieri writes:
| On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:12:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> Q: Is that a sun provided solaris?
>
| Yes, latest solaris 10 also bundles gcc:
>
| $ pkginfo | grep gcc
| system SUNWgcc gcc - The GNU C compiler
| system SU
Pavel Sanda writes:
| Richard Heck wrote:
>>> | I could provide server space for the web/wiki/ftp on my office server,
>>> | probably.
>>>
>>> Do you mean a server in your office or a server (in a server room) at
>>> your office?
>>>
>>>
>> The server in my office: frege.brown.edu. I guess the
Pavel Sanda writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>>
>> As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
>> lot. I wondered if some of you might be interrested in testing out using
>> git when doing LyX development. (For all I know several of you already
>> are...)
>
| i use g
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:12:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Q: Is that a sun provided solaris?
Yes, latest solaris 10 also bundles gcc:
$ pkginfo | grep gcc
system SUNWgcc gcc - The GNU C compiler
system SUNWgccruntime GCC Runtime
Richard Heck wrote:
>> | I could provide server space for the web/wiki/ftp on my office server,
>> | probably.
>>
>> Do you mean a server in your office or a server (in a server room) at
>> your office?
>>
>>
> The server in my office: frege.brown.edu. I guess the downside is that, if
> anythin
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
> As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
> lot. I wondered if some of you might be interrested in testing out using
> git when doing LyX development. (For all I know several of you already
> are...)
i use git as main tool when working on
Peter Kümmel writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[...]
>> | What about a 'evaluation'? Possible candidates are:
>> | ww.sf.net
>>
>> I'll look hard at that. It seems to have everything that we want. bug
>> tracker, wiki, git...
>> (Unless I get objections I'll register the LyX project, I don't
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Peter Kümmel writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Bo Peng writes:
The bug database might be a problem...
| I know that many people dislike sourceforge but sourceforge supports
| pmwiki (our web), trac, and some project and bug tracking systems...
| http://apps.s
Bo Peng writes:
>> Now that is has been brought up, I think we should have a close look at
>> sourceforge.net.
>
| I have used sourceforge for my own project for five years and I am
| satisfied with their services.
>
| 1. mailinglist based on mailman works.
Note that our mailinglists are not run
> Now that is has been brought up, I think we should have a close look at
> sourceforge.net.
I have used sourceforge for my own project for five years and I am
satisfied with their services.
1. mailinglist based on mailman works.
2. I use subversion but it supports git as well.
(http://apps.sour
Peter Kümmel writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Bo Peng writes:
>>
The bug database might be a problem...
>> | I know that many people dislike sourceforge but sourceforge supports
>> | pmwiki (our web), trac, and some project and bug tracking systems...
>> | http://apps.sourceforge.ne
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Bo Peng writes:
The bug database might be a problem...
| I know that many people dislike sourceforge but sourceforge supports
| pmwiki (our web), trac, and some project and bug tracking systems...
| http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Hosted%20Apps
Righ
rgheck writes:
[...]
| Another possibility would be to see if the Brown LUG would want to do
| it. They've got space, and they're always looking for things to do for
| the FOSS community.
Now that is has been brought up, I think we should have a close look at
sourceforge.net.
| I need to upgrad
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
rgheck writes:
I do not think that the repo and the web/wiki/ftp have to be in the same
place. But it would be nice though.
| I could provide server space for the web/wiki/ftp on my office server,
| probably.
Do you mean a server in your office or a s
Bo Peng writes:
>>
>> The bug database might be a problem...
>
| I know that many people dislike sourceforge but sourceforge supports
| pmwiki (our web), trac, and some project and bug tracking systems...
>
| http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Hosted%20Apps
Right. And they seem to s
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:48:34PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> We should (soonish, already overdue) get a new machine, if we want/need
> one that is. I have not seen the box since before Trolltech moved office
> a couple of years ago, they handled the move and everything.
>
> I have access
>
> The bug database might be a problem...
I know that many people dislike sourceforge but sourceforge supports
pmwiki (our web), trac, and some project and bug tracking systems...
http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Hosted%20Apps
Bo
lar...@lyx.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| I belive github might be a good place for the repo and the wiki (other
| can judge better than me). And do we really need the regular web space
| if the wiki is good?
>
| Anyhow we certainly can buy web space if that is required. (to a certain
| limit
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
| lar...@lyx.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>> I do not think that the repo and the web/wiki/ftp have to be in the same
>> place. But it would be nice though.
>
| We have to find a place with either a competent admin with time in his
| hands or a well run forge. Au
rgheck writes:
>> I do not think that the repo and the web/wiki/ftp have to be in the same
>> place. But it would be nice though.
>>
>>
| I could provide server space for the web/wiki/ftp on my office server,
| probably.
Do you mean a server in your office or a server (in a server room) at
yo
lar...@lyx.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
> I do not think that the repo and the web/wiki/ftp have to be in the same
> place. But it would be nice though.
We have to find a place with either a competent admin with time in his
hands or a well run forge. Aussie is getting more and more inadequate
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz
writes:
| On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:55:49PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz
writes:
| Last time the topic came up it looked like there are not too many people
| around who would mind a complete switch to git.
Did you then also tal
Andre Poenitz
writes:
| On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:55:49PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz
>>
>> writes:
>>
>> | Last time the topic came up it looked like there are not too many people
>> | around who would mind a complete switch to git.
>>
>> Did you then also talk about p
Andre Poenitz
writes:
| On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:50:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Last time the topic came up it looked like there are not too many people
>> | around who would mind a complete switch to git.
>>
>> If going that route, I would suggest getting some experience with
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:55:49PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz
>
> writes:
>
> | Last time the topic came up it looked like there are not too many people
> | around who would mind a complete switch to git.
>
> Did you then also talk about placing the repo on a different ser
Enrico Forestieri writes:
| On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:28:33PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> I would like to upgrade to 1.38 first though, and then work on replacing
>> boost libs with libs that exist in tr1 (or the upcoming standard).
>
| please, note that there are systems (most nota
lar...@gullik.net (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
writes:
| And now I see that this is also mentioned on the wiki. But it should be
| the preferred way to doing it. (So placed at the top of the page).
And *now* I see that this is just how to setup a "dumb" git clone, so
git svn init, so not exacly what I h
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:50:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Last time the topic came up it looked like there are not too many people
> | around who would mind a complete switch to git.
>
> If going that route, I would suggest getting some experience with git-svn
> first. Then you pers
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:28:33PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I would like to upgrade to 1.38 first though, and then work on replacing
> boost libs with libs that exist in tr1 (or the upcoming standard).
please, note that there are systems (most notably, Solaris) that still
ship gcc 3.
Andre Poenitz
writes:
| Last time the topic came up it looked like there are not too many people
| around who would mind a complete switch to git.
Did you then also talk about placing the repo on a different server?
Something similar to github perhaps?
--
Lgb
lar...@gullik.net (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
writes:
| Peter Kümmel writes:
>
| | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
>>> lot. I wondered if some of you might be interrested in testing out using
>>> git when doing LyX development. (For al
Peter Kümmel writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
>> lot. I wondered if some of you might be interrested in testing out using
>> git when doing LyX development. (For all I know several of you already
>> are...)
>>
>> If there
Andre Poenitz
writes:
| On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:26:27PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
>> lot.
>
| I thought you were doing Qt programming? ;-)
>
>> I wondered if some of you might be interrested in testing out using
>>
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:26:27PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
> lot.
I thought you were doing Qt programming? ;-)
> I wondered if some of you might be interrested in testing out using
> git when doing LyX development. (
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
lot. I wondered if some of you might be interrested in testing out using
git when doing LyX development. (For all I know several of you already
are...)
If there are interest I'll try to setup a git tr
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Since I may be the only one noticing it, I guess it can wait for 1.6.3.
OK, fine.
Jürgen
Le 4 mars 09 à 20:46, Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This should eventually go to branch, but there is no need to hurry.
The decision is up to you.
Since I may be the only one noticing it, I guess it can wait for 1.6.3.
JMarc
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> If there are interest I'll try to setup a git tree that you can clone
> and set up as a git-svn tree.
> (I'll even write up a wiki page to explain briefly how to do that.)
Personally, I would be interested in that (although I do not have
experiences with git yet).
It
Rob Oakes wrote:
> In particular, there are a few features I would love to develop (either as
> plug-ins/extensions or part of the main program). However, I do not know
> how such features are proposed to the developer community at large. What
> is the best way to go about this? At the moment, I
lar...@gullik.net (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
writes:
| Andre Poenitz
|
| writes:
>
| | On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:20:34AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
I think I'll just go and hide beneath my rock again ;-)
>>>
>>> Maybe you are interested in replacing boost with 'real' C++: TR1.
>>
| | I tried rep
As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
lot. I wondered if some of you might be interrested in testing out using
git when doing LyX development. (For all I know several of you already
are...)
If there are interest I'll try to setup a git tree that you can clone
and se
Andre Poenitz
writes:
| On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:20:34AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>>> I think I'll just go and hide beneath my rock again ;-)
>>
>> Maybe you are interested in replacing boost with 'real' C++: TR1.
>
| I tried replacing our boost::shared_ptr with tr1::shared_ptr in
| the week
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 00:09:49 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> In Fedora 11 the errors might probably be fixed by usinging a more up to
> date boost (1.38 f.ex.) and --without-included-boost. For all others
> stuck with an older boost no such luck. So I have a Q: Would you like me
> to upgrade th
Dear LyX Developers,
I am writing this e-mail for a couple of reasons. First, I wanted to
generally say thank you for creating a fantastic program. LyX is my
favorite writing environment. It was my first introduction to LaTeX and the
concept of "WYSIWYM" editing. Each iteration of the progr
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This should eventually go to branch, but there is no need to hurry.
The decision is up to you.
Jürgen
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> btw when do you plan to release it?
There is one outstanding issue which should be fixed, since it potentially
results in really bad dataloss:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5813
Apart from that, we are ready.
Unfortunately, I'm totally blocked by real work, so I c
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:20:34AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
I think I'll just go and hide beneath my rock again ;-)
Maybe you are interested in replacing boost with 'real' C++: TR1.
I tried replacing our boost::shared_ptr with tr1::shared_ptr in
the week before the Meet
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 18:43:11 Bo Peng wrote:
> Please apply. I do not have trunk here.
Done. Thanks.
> Thanks.
> Bo
--
José Abílio
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:54:31AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Right... I forgot... Qt app now.
>
> André attempted to really do this last meeting (using Qt in core) but
> failed eventually :-)
Hm, not really. I seem to remember a consensus that using Qt in co
> I am not sure if that was the original reason. logging has appeared in python
> 2.3 and initially for lyx 1.4 we planned for python 2.2. I am not sure if that
> is the reason FWIW I am just adding this to be fair.
This might be the reason, but I did not even look for something like
this when I w
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:20:34AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> I think I'll just go and hide beneath my rock again ;-)
>
> Maybe you are interested in replacing boost with 'real' C++: TR1.
I tried replacing our boost::shared_ptr with tr1::shared_ptr in
the week before the Meeting (gcc 4.3.x IIRC
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 01:54:29AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Pavel Sanda writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> >> In Fedora 11 the errors might probably be fixed by usinging a more up to
> >> date boost (1.38 f.ex.) and --without-included-boost. For all others
> >> stuck with an ol
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:52:30 Bo Peng wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> A Tee class is defined in lib/configure.py. Writing to this object
> writes to the standard console as well as a logfile. This is clever,
> well, for a Python newbie who learned Python but not its standard
> libraries.
I am not sur
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Bennett Helm wrote:
>> By the way Bennett, did you try to compile Qt with the new raster graphics
>> system? That's the only to see the performance improvment AFAIU.
>
> No, I didn't. (Was I supposed to know that?)
>
> I tried again, but I can't get it to compile
lasgout...@lyx.org writes:
> Author: lasgouttes
> Date: Wed Mar 4 18:07:05 2009
> New Revision: 28703
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28703
> Log:
> In math matrices, make sure that only the align-type tablar-feature can get a
> check box in menus (with some themes, empty check boxes
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> strings to translate, please wait for 1.6.3.
btw when do you plan to release it?
pavel
Dear all,
A Tee class is defined in lib/configure.py. Writing to this object
writes to the standard console as well as a logfile. This is clever,
well, for a Python newbie who learned Python but not its standard
libraries.
The right way to do this is to use the Python logging module. In the
attac
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> just found box and note insets do not have open/close item in their
> context menu. i'll add them unless comebody complains.
You can submit to 1.6.2svn, if exactly these strings are already in the *.po
files (i.e., including the accelerators). If the commit generates new
stri
>just found box and note insets do not have open/close
>item in their context menu. i'll add them unless comebody
>complains.
And if you right-click on the text in an open note or box or inside a
table, you should get the edit menu + inset menu.
>Pavel
Vincent
hi,
just found box and note insets do not have open/close item in their context
menu. i'll add them unless comebody complains.
pavel
diff --git a/lib/ui/stdcontext.inc b/lib/ui/stdcontext.inc
index 301608c..74d9d0c 100644
--- a/lib/ui/stdcontext.inc
+++ b/lib/ui/stdcontext.inc
@@ -148,6 +148,9 @@
Kornel Benko wrote:
> > staci zeditovat generate_contributions.py,
> > zmeny se postupem doby zpropaguji do CREDITS a na web samy. Pokud to
> > specha muzu poslat dalsi intrukce :)
before we eventually switch this list to cz-sk lang as a part of prepared
czechoslovak world domination in the post-c
Am 2009-03-04 schrieb Kornel Benko:
Sorry, not intended
Kornel
--
Kornel Benko
kornel.be...@berlin.de
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Am 2009-03-04 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > Am 2009-03-02 schrieb sa...@lyx.org:
> > > "case insensitive" and "complete word" search
> > > +...@bkornel Benko
> > > +...@ie-mail: Kornel.Benko () berlin ! de
> > > + small bugfixes
> > > �...@bgraham Biswell
> > >
> >
> > Pavel,
> > radšej by som v
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Pavel Sanda writes:
> > i thought the main reason for including boost in our tree was that we
> > used some nifty new features and it was not usuall that linux
> > distributions have such a new version. but this is long time ago, so
> > this reason no more holds.
>
Pavel Sanda writes:
> i thought the main reason for including boost in our tree was that we
> used some nifty new features and it was not usuall that linux
> distributions have such a new version. but this is long time ago, so
> this reason no more holds.
But it will again if we upgrade the boos
Richard Heck wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
>> Pavel Sanda writes:
>>
>> | Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>>
In Fedora 11 the errors might probably be fixed by usinging a more up to
date boost (1.38 f.ex.) and --without-included-boost. For all others
stuck with an older boost n
lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
> In Fedora 11 the errors might probably be fixed by usinging a more up to
> date boost (1.38 f.ex.) and --without-included-boost. For all others
> stuck with an older boost no such luck. So I have a Q: Would you like me
> to upgrade the included boos
77 matches
Mail list logo
