On 4/22/07 4:01 PM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 apr 2007, at 23.31, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/22/07 3:07 PM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 apr 2007, at 22.35, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/22/07 1:58 AM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
So, yesterday I booted into Ubuntu (I have a dual-boot) because I wanted to
update LyX there also. There was a distribution upgrade so I upgraded then
compiled 1.5.0svn/beta2 (not sure which it is if downloaded from svn). By
default it used Qt4.2.3 and now I have the LyX
On 4/22/07 4:01 PM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 apr 2007, at 23.31, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/22/07 3:07 PM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 apr 2007, at 22.35, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/22/07 1:58 AM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
So, yesterday I booted into Ubuntu (I have a dual-boot) because I wanted to
update LyX there also. There was a distribution upgrade so I upgraded then
compiled 1.5.0svn/beta2 (not sure which it is if downloaded from svn). By
default it used Qt4.2.3 and now I have the LyX
On 4/22/07 4:01 PM, "Anders Ekberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 22 apr 2007, at 23.31, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>
>> On 4/22/07 3:07 PM, "Anders Ekberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 22 apr 2007, at 22.35, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/22/07 1:58 AM, "Anders Ekberg" <[EMAIL
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
So, yesterday I booted into Ubuntu (I have a dual-boot) because I wanted to
update LyX there also. There was a distribution upgrade so I upgraded then
compiled 1.5.0svn/beta2 (not sure which it is if downloaded from svn). By
default it used Qt4.2.3 and now I have the LyX
On 21 apr 2007, at 23.19, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/21/07 3:08 PM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, Patrick De Visschere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anders Ekberg wrote:
On 21 apr 2007, at 23.19, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/21/07 3:08 PM, Anders Ekberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, Patrick De Visschere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes
On 4/22/07 1:58 AM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recompiled both Qt4.3.0snapshot and Qt4.2.3 and the only
difference was
rather than using sudo make install¹ I just entered make
install¹. Now I
have LyX1.5.0beta2 compiled under Qt4.2.3, but I got the same error
message
On 22 apr 2007, at 22.35, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/22/07 1:58 AM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recompiled both Qt4.3.0snapshot and Qt4.2.3 and the only
difference was
rather than using ‘sudo make install’ I just entered ‘make
install’. Now I
have LyX1.5.0beta2 compiled under
On 22 apr 2007, at 23.31, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/22/07 3:07 PM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 apr 2007, at 22.35, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/22/07 1:58 AM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recompiled both Qt4.3.0snapshot and Qt4.2.3 and the only
difference was
On 21 apr 2007, at 23.19, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/21/07 3:08 PM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, Patrick De Visschere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anders Ekberg wrote:
On 21 apr 2007, at 23.19, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/21/07 3:08 PM, Anders Ekberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, Patrick De Visschere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes
On 4/22/07 1:58 AM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recompiled both Qt4.3.0snapshot and Qt4.2.3 and the only
difference was
rather than using sudo make install¹ I just entered make
install¹. Now I
have LyX1.5.0beta2 compiled under Qt4.2.3, but I got the same error
message
On 22 apr 2007, at 22.35, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/22/07 1:58 AM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recompiled both Qt4.3.0snapshot and Qt4.2.3 and the only
difference was
rather than using ‘sudo make install’ I just entered ‘make
install’. Now I
have LyX1.5.0beta2 compiled under
On 22 apr 2007, at 23.31, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/22/07 3:07 PM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 apr 2007, at 22.35, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/22/07 1:58 AM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recompiled both Qt4.3.0snapshot and Qt4.2.3 and the only
difference was
On 21 apr 2007, at 23.19, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/21/07 3:08 PM, "Anders Ekberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, "Patrick De Visschere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL
Anders Ekberg wrote:
On 21 apr 2007, at 23.19, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/21/07 3:08 PM, "Anders Ekberg"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, "Patrick De Visschere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, "Abdelrazak
On 4/22/07 1:58 AM, "Anders Ekberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I recompiled both Qt4.3.0snapshot and Qt4.2.3 and the only
>> difference was
>> rather than using sudo make install¹ I just entered make
>> install¹. Now I
>> have LyX1.5.0beta2 compiled under Qt4.2.3, but I got the same error
On 22 apr 2007, at 22.35, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/22/07 1:58 AM, "Anders Ekberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I recompiled both Qt4.3.0snapshot and Qt4.2.3 and the only
difference was
rather than using ‘sudo make install’ I just entered ‘make
install’. Now I
have LyX1.5.0beta2 compiled under
On 22 apr 2007, at 23.31, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/22/07 3:07 PM, "Anders Ekberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 22 apr 2007, at 22.35, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/22/07 1:58 AM, "Anders Ekberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I recompiled both Qt4.3.0snapshot and Qt4.2.3 and the only
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, Patrick De Visschere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems I've
come to the
same
On 4/21/07 3:08 PM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, Patrick De Visschere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, Patrick De Visschere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems I've
come to the
same
On 4/21/07 3:08 PM, Anders Ekberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, Patrick De Visschere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, "Patrick De Visschere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>
>> On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>>>
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems
On 4/21/07 3:08 PM, "Anders Ekberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, "Patrick De Visschere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>>>
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, Patrick De Visschere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems I've
come to the
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, Patrick De Visschere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems I've
come to the
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, "Patrick De Visschere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>
>> On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>>>
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems I've come to the
same result as Bennett. When compiling LyX1.5.0svn I get an error saying qt
4 library not found !.
Is it after './autogen.sh' or after './configure'?
In any case, I guess there should be some log
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems I've come to the
same result as Bennett. When compiling LyX1.5.0svn I get an error saying qt
4 library not found !.
Is it after './autogen.sh'
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems I've
come to the
same result as Bennett. When compiling LyX1.5.0svn I get an error
saying qt
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, Patrick De Visschere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems I've
come to the
same
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems I've come to the
same result as Bennett. When compiling LyX1.5.0svn I get an error saying qt
4 library not found !.
Is it after './autogen.sh' or after './configure'?
In any case, I guess there should be some log
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems I've come to the
same result as Bennett. When compiling LyX1.5.0svn I get an error saying qt
4 library not found !.
Is it after './autogen.sh'
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems I've
come to the
same result as Bennett. When compiling LyX1.5.0svn I get an error
saying qt
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, Patrick De Visschere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems I've
come to the
same
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems I've come to the
same result as Bennett. When compiling LyX1.5.0svn I get an error saying "qt
4 library not found !".
Is it after './autogen.sh' or after './configure'?
In any case, I guess there should be some
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>
>> Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems I've come to the
>> same result as Bennett. When compiling LyX1.5.0svn I get an error saying "qt
>> 4 library not found !".
>
> Is it after
On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems I've
come to the
same result as Bennett. When compiling LyX1.5.0svn I get an error
saying
On 4/19/07 11:53 AM, "Patrick De Visschere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>
>> On 4/19/07 1:53 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>>>
Well, after hours and hours and hours of compiling it seems
On 4/17/07 9:30 AM, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 17, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
If you are not willing to use SVN, I can send you a snapshot of
current
trunk instead. Beta 1 is too old :-)
Abdel.
I have no problem with trying the latest snapshot. I just
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
It's actually simpler than what you've already done. If you use
macports, simply enter sudo port install subversion and wait until
it's done. If you use fink (or Fink Commander) it's equally easy.
Then follow the instructions on the lyx
On 4/17/07 9:30 AM, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 17, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
If you are not willing to use SVN, I can send you a snapshot of
current
trunk instead. Beta 1 is too old :-)
Abdel.
I have no problem with trying the latest snapshot. I just
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
It's actually simpler than what you've already done. If you use
macports, simply enter sudo port install subversion and wait until
it's done. If you use fink (or Fink Commander) it's equally easy.
Then follow the instructions on the lyx
On 4/17/07 9:30 AM, "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>
>>> If you are not willing to use SVN, I can send you a snapshot of
>>> current
>>> trunk instead. Beta 1 is too old :-)
>>>
>>> Abdel.
>>
>> I have no problem with trying the
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
It's actually simpler than what you've already done. If you use
macports, simply enter "sudo port install subversion" and wait until
it's done. If you use fink (or Fink Commander) it's equally easy.
Then follow the instructions on the lyx
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/16/07 3:34 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Ok, I think I've got a snapshot of Qt4.4 compiled, but when I try to
compile
LyX 1.4.4 I get an error that there is no makefile found.
As
On 4/17/07 3:35 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/16/07 3:34 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Ok, I think I've got a snapshot of Qt4.4 compiled, but when I try to
On 4/17/07 9:30 AM, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 17, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
If you are not willing to use SVN, I can send you a snapshot of
current
trunk instead. Beta 1 is too old :-)
Abdel.
I have no problem with trying the latest snapshot. I just
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/16/07 3:34 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Ok, I think I've got a snapshot of Qt4.4 compiled, but when I try to
compile
LyX 1.4.4 I get an error that there is no makefile found.
As
On 4/17/07 3:35 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/16/07 3:34 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Ok, I think I've got a snapshot of Qt4.4 compiled, but when I try to
On 4/17/07 9:30 AM, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 17, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
If you are not willing to use SVN, I can send you a snapshot of
current
trunk instead. Beta 1 is too old :-)
Abdel.
I have no problem with trying the latest snapshot. I just
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/16/07 3:34 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Ok, I think I've got a snapshot of Qt4.4 compiled, but when I try to
compile
LyX 1.4.4 I get an error that there is no makefile found.
On 4/17/07 3:35 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>> On 4/16/07 3:34 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
> Ok, I think I've got a snapshot of Qt4.4
On 4/17/07 9:30 AM, "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>
>>> If you are not willing to use SVN, I can send you a snapshot of
>>> current
>>> trunk instead. Beta 1 is too old :-)
>>>
>>> Abdel.
>>
>> I have no problem with trying the
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Ok, I think I've got a snapshot of Qt4.4 compiled, but when I try to
compile
LyX 1.4.4 I get an error that there is no makefile found.
As Bennett said, my request for investigation was about the upcoming
LyX-1.5.0 :-)
On 4/16/07 3:34 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Ok, I think I've got a snapshot of Qt4.4 compiled, but when I try to
compile
LyX 1.4.4 I get an error that there is no makefile found.
As Bennett said, my
On Apr 16, 2007, at 4:16 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Ok, so Qt4.3 just finished compiling and I'm running make right
now. I have the 1.5.0beta1 source ready to compile when it's done, but
looking at the INSTALL.MacOSX I need the LyX/Mac skeleton
application bundle
LyX.app. Is there anyway I can
On 4/16/07 2:26 PM, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 16, 2007, at 4:16 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Ok, so Qt4.3 just finished compiling and I'm running make right
now. I have the 1.5.0beta1 source ready to compile when it's done, but
looking at the INSTALL.MacOSX I need the LyX/Mac
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Ok, I think I've got a snapshot of Qt4.4 compiled, but when I try to
compile
LyX 1.4.4 I get an error that there is no makefile found.
As Bennett said, my request for investigation was about the upcoming
LyX-1.5.0 :-)
On 4/16/07 3:34 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Ok, I think I've got a snapshot of Qt4.4 compiled, but when I try to
compile
LyX 1.4.4 I get an error that there is no makefile found.
As Bennett said, my
On Apr 16, 2007, at 4:16 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Ok, so Qt4.3 just finished compiling and I'm running make right
now. I have the 1.5.0beta1 source ready to compile when it's done, but
looking at the INSTALL.MacOSX I need the LyX/Mac skeleton
application bundle
LyX.app. Is there anyway I can
On 4/16/07 2:26 PM, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 16, 2007, at 4:16 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Ok, so Qt4.3 just finished compiling and I'm running make right
now. I have the 1.5.0beta1 source ready to compile when it's done, but
looking at the INSTALL.MacOSX I need the LyX/Mac
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Ok, I think I've got a snapshot of Qt4.4 compiled, but when I try to
compile
LyX 1.4.4 I get an error that there is no makefile found.
As Bennett said, my request for investigation was about the upcoming
LyX-1.5.0 :-)
On 4/16/07 3:34 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bennett Helm wrote:
>> On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>
>>> Ok, I think I've got a snapshot of Qt4.4 compiled, but when I try to
>>> compile
>>> LyX 1.4.4 I get an error that there is no makefile found.
>
>
On Apr 16, 2007, at 4:16 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Ok, so Qt4.3 just finished compiling and I'm running make right
now. I have the 1.5.0beta1 source ready to compile when it's done, but
looking at the INSTALL.MacOSX I need the LyX/Mac skeleton
application bundle
LyX.app. Is there anyway I can
On 4/16/07 2:26 PM, "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2007, at 4:16 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>
>> Ok, so Qt4.3 just finished compiling and I'm running make right
>> now. I have the 1.5.0beta1 source ready to compile when it's done, but
>> looking at the INSTALL.MacOSX I need
On 4/13/07 7:59 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, Abdelrazak Younes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if you could test with the latest snapshot of the
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/13/07 7:59 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, Abdelrazak Younes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice
On 4/13/07 7:59 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, Abdelrazak Younes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if you could test with the latest snapshot of the
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/13/07 7:59 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, Abdelrazak Younes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice
On 4/13/07 7:59 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bennett Helm wrote:
>> On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>
>>> Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be nice if you could test with
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/13/07 7:59 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if you could test with the latest snapshot of the
upcoming Qt4.3. I've been told that it's much quicker at drawing,
especially on MacOS.
Abdel.
If setting up Qt4.3 was fairly easy and you
On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if you could test with the latest snapshot of the
upcoming Qt4.3. I've been told that it's much quicker at drawing,
especially on MacOS.
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, Abdelrazak Younes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if you could test with the latest snapshot of the
upcoming Qt4.3. I've been told that it's much quicker at drawing,
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if you could test with the latest snapshot of the
upcoming Qt4.3. I've been told that it's much quicker at drawing,
especially on MacOS.
Abdel.
If setting up Qt4.3 was fairly easy and you
On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if you could test with the latest snapshot of the
upcoming Qt4.3. I've been told that it's much quicker at drawing,
especially on MacOS.
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, Abdelrazak Younes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if you could test with the latest snapshot of the
upcoming Qt4.3. I've been told that it's much quicker at drawing,
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be nice if you could test with the latest snapshot of the
upcoming Qt4.3. I've been told that it's much quicker at drawing,
especially on MacOS.
Abdel.
If setting up Qt4.3 was fairly easy and you
On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be nice if you could test with the latest snapshot of the
upcoming Qt4.3. I've been told that it's much quicker at drawing,
especially on
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be nice if you could test with the latest snapshot of the
upcoming Qt4.3. I've been told that it's much quicker at
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if you could test with the latest snapshot of the
upcoming Qt4.3. I've been told that it's much quicker at drawing,
especially on MacOS.
Abdel.
If setting up Qt4.3 was fairly easy and you didn't mind giving some
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if you could test with the latest snapshot of the
upcoming Qt4.3. I've been told that it's much quicker at drawing,
especially on MacOS.
Abdel.
If setting up Qt4.3 was fairly easy and you didn't mind giving some
On 4/12/07 1:22 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be nice if you could test with the latest snapshot of the
> upcoming Qt4.3. I've been told that it's much quicker at drawing,
> especially on MacOS.
> Abdel.
If setting up Qt4.3 was fairly easy and you didn't mind
- Original Message -
From: Bob Lounsbury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]; LyX lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: Lyx 144 on Intel Mac: problems with large documents
On 4/10/07 2:28 PM, Robert Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Apr 10, 2007, at 4:28 PM, Robert Neumann wrote:
Hello,
I just installed lyx 144 sucessfully on a macbook core duo. Opening
and
working on a document with 40 pages was no problem (well scrolling up
and down was a bit sluggish...)
But when I opened a document with 290 pages and about 80
On 4/11/07 7:31 AM, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 4:28 PM, Robert Neumann wrote:
Hello,
I just installed lyx 144 sucessfully on a macbook core duo. Opening
and
working on a document with 40 pages was no problem (well scrolling up
and down was a bit sluggish...)
Thanks,
Part of the issue may stem from your having LyX display
the graphics; doing this requires that LyX convert the graphics one-
by-one to a format it is able to display, and this may take a while.
ok, I will turn of the graphics preview, I dont really need it.
The other issue -- taking a
On Apr 11, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Robert Neumann wrote:
Thanks,
Part of the issue may stem from your having LyX display
the graphics; doing this requires that LyX convert the graphics one-
by-one to a format it is able to display, and this may take a while.
ok, I will turn of the graphics
On Apr 11, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Bennett,
You bring up a point I was planning to ask. I have also noticed a
slowness
of screen redraws when typing or navigating on my 600Mhz iBook that
was not
noticeable with LyX 1.3.7 but is noticeable with LyX 1.4.4.
Specifically
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 09:31:35AM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 4:28 PM, Robert Neumann wrote:
Hello, I just installed lyx 144 sucessfully on a macbook core duo.
Opening and working on a document with 40 pages was no problem (well
scrolling up and down was a bit
On 4/11/07 11:05 AM, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 11, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Bennett,
You bring up a point I was planning to ask. I have also noticed a
slowness
of screen redraws when typing or navigating on my 600Mhz iBook that
was not
noticeable with
On Apr 11, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 09:31:35AM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 4:28 PM, Robert Neumann wrote:
Hello, I just installed lyx 144 sucessfully on a macbook core duo.
Opening and working on a document with 40 pages was no
- Original Message -
From: Bob Lounsbury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]; LyX lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: Lyx 144 on Intel Mac: problems with large documents
On 4/10/07 2:28 PM, Robert Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Apr 10, 2007, at 4:28 PM, Robert Neumann wrote:
Hello,
I just installed lyx 144 sucessfully on a macbook core duo. Opening
and
working on a document with 40 pages was no problem (well scrolling up
and down was a bit sluggish...)
But when I opened a document with 290 pages and about 80
On 4/11/07 7:31 AM, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 4:28 PM, Robert Neumann wrote:
Hello,
I just installed lyx 144 sucessfully on a macbook core duo. Opening
and
working on a document with 40 pages was no problem (well scrolling up
and down was a bit sluggish...)
Thanks,
Part of the issue may stem from your having LyX display
the graphics; doing this requires that LyX convert the graphics one-
by-one to a format it is able to display, and this may take a while.
ok, I will turn of the graphics preview, I dont really need it.
The other issue -- taking a
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
