socket.
>> * no idea what the pinout is but it could be deduced quickly. I think since
>> the PC8201 uses normal pinouts, so too does the 8300.
>>
>> So my bet would be a 27C512 would do it. It is possible however that it is
>> still just a 32kB rom. Perhaps OU
open it up again and count...
>> can't be 27c1001. that's 32 pins as you say Mike.
>>
>> so, still a mystery.
>>
>> I thought maybe it could just be a 64k ROM - that clearly can fit in a
>> 28pin socket.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>>
downstairs to open it up again and count...
>> can't be 27c1001. that's 32 pins as you say Mike.
>>
>> so, still a mystery.
>>
>> I thought maybe it could just be a 64k ROM - that clearly can fit in a
>> 28pin socket.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>
that
> it is still just a 32kB rom. Perhaps OUT163,2 sets a signal on the
> PIO or otherwise that the processor can check, to decide what mode it
> should be in.
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Frederick Whitaker
> wrote:
>> Mike
&g
;Model 100 Discussion"
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] Parts for an NEC PC-8300
> Mike
>
> I don't have an image. I don't know if the ROM you are referring to will
> do the job. The 8300 ROM is bigger than the 8201, but I believe it uses
&g
or even reading this?
Waiting to hear...
m
- Original Message -
From: Mike Stein
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] Parts for an NEC PC-8300
Worth a try. Looks like a 27C128; can anyone confirm?
Fred: I'll contact yo
Worth a try. Looks like a 27C128; can anyone confirm?
Fred: I'll contact you off-list to get address details etc.
m
- Original Message -
From: John R. Hogerhuis
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] Parts for an NEC PC-8300
I
Hi Frederick,
If you can send me or point me to an image of that ROM I can probably burn an
EPROM for you, assuming it's a JEDEC-standard 27xxx type.
m
- Original Message -
From: "Frederick Whitaker"
To: "Model 100 Discussion"
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 6:27 PM
Subject: [M100]
Sorry about that, the formatting didn't make it; let's try this:
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Stein"
To: "Model 100 Discussion"
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 1:10 PM
Subject: [M100] QUAD on Oshpark
-
>From Bitchin100:
QUAD circuit
>From Bitchin100:
QUAD circuit board is now available on OSHPARK. You can build your own!
Let's get any and all build information and experiences people have captured
here... parts lists, tips etc. Can't find it; could you paste a link, please?
And while I'm at it, is the 8K board shared
Thanks for posting the pics on Google; makes it a lot easier to follow.
m
- Original Message -
From: Brian White
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2017 7:35 AM
Subject: Re: [M100] Model 600 opt rom
I have recieved the Molex sockets. 134 sockets. Anyone wan
pull
it right off for a flush fit.
m
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Adolph"
To: "Model 100 Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] REX second source
> Hi Mike,
> Regarding the NEC REX version, I found on ebay a part t
Congratulations and welcome back!
mike
VE3IPK
- Original Message -
From: Roger Mullins
To: m100@lists.bitchin100.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 1:51 PM
Subject: [M100] Hello (again) from a newly-minted ham radio operator
Hi all-
I was actually a member of this
Yeah, I think we already discussed that 'sliced-through-the-holes' OptROM edge
treatment (as well as the Facebook issue ;-) last summer...
@ Steve:
Did you end up getting some of those Batten and Allen edge pins that D'Asaro
uses, or are you using something else for the NEC etc.?
m
- Orig
so
colourfully expressed in the reply.
Once again, sorry; let's leave it there.
m
- Original Message -
From: John R. Hogerhuis
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2017 1:42 AM
Subject: Re: [M100] Praise for REX
Mike be nice, please.
Brian, swear
g it up on bitchin100 or
somewhere was always a plan to do sometime. Or you could di it without waiting
for me if it matters so much.
--
bkw
On Jan 6, 2017 8:21 PM, "Mike Stein" wrote:
Ah yes, Facebook again; too bad you couldn't post your no doubt excellent
writeups
Ah yes, Facebook again; too bad you couldn't post your no doubt excellent
writeups on one of the many sites accessible to the public...
Oh well...
- Original Message -
From: Brian White
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] Praise
Greedy hoarders!
Happy New Year, all!
m
- Original Message -
From: John R. Hogerhuis
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] Praise for REX
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Brian White wrote:
not "FigTroniX". I just w
Finish up some hardware additions that have been in the works for a couple of
years now, but don't hold your breath... ;-)
- Original Message -
From: John R. Hogerhuis
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 2:49 PM
Subject: [M100] Happy New Year
Yes, Ha
Me too; when I bought my brand new M100 at Radio Shack I was already older than
it is today...
Best wishes for the New Year, everyone!
m
- Original Message -
From: "Daryl Tester"
To: "Model 100 Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 2:07 AM
Subject: Re: [M100] Welcome to 2017
Pshaw!
>From the first comment:
"As for small, light, long battery life writing tool…my wife wrote a novel
using a TRS-80 Model 100."
- Original Message -
From: John R. Hogerhuis
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 3:43 PM
Subject: [M100] A new writing t
On Dec 1, 2016, at 12:18 PM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> From the author himself!
LOL. Sorry I couldn’t provide an autographed copy. :-)
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:16 AM Mike Nugent wrote:
> See HOTKEY.BA and HOTKEY.DO in the Club100 library:
>
> http://www.c
rtualT?
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 3:02 PM Mike Stein wrote:
Not really that complex; the required changes are now known, so all that's
needed is to replace the original ROM with a patched EPROM (and move the keys
around).
If someone here has a QWERTY M10 it'd be even easier; th
Not really that complex; the required changes are now known, so all that's
needed is to replace the original ROM with a patched EPROM (and move the keys
around).
If someone here has a QWERTY M10 it'd be even easier; they could dump the ROM
and then you could just replace the ROM with a copy of
See HOTKEY.BA and HOTKEY.DO in the Club100 library:
http://www.club100.org/library/libutl.html
Or directly ftp:
ftp://ftp.whtech.com/club100/utl/hotkey.ba
ftp://ftp.whtech.com/club100/utl/hotkey.do
On Nov 29, 2016, at 1:00 PM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> Anyone know of a good way to insert a
m100 nec8201a ram types.docx
1drv.ms
Microsoft Word Document
--
From: M100 on behalf of Mike Stein
Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016 10:46:25 PM
To: Model 100 Discussion
Subject: Re: [M100] Mode
7;s been discussed on the list in the past, but I can't remember the
> outcome (or reach my archive from here, and gmane is still in a state
> of
> flux after its acquisition). I think Mike S. had a hand in this if
Nope, not I; lots of different recipes and experiences on the web
> That means that the bizarre M100 memory module (pinout anyways) was used by
> more than one machine.
Not necessarily, they may just be late model M100 RAM upgrade modules; they
certainly look cheaper to build than the original 4 chip version.
My memory ain't what it used to be, but ISTR seein
its lone serial port,
while simple and effective, seems very overworked.
On Nov 1, 2016 11:21, "Mike Stein" wrote:
Regarding the WiFi modem, there's no need to build anything; one of the
advantages of the M100 over the C64 is that the M100 has a standard RS-232 port
Regarding the WiFi modem, there's no need to build anything; one of the
advantages of the M100 over the C64 is that the M100 has a standard RS-232 port
capable of speeds >38Kbps and RS232 WiFi modems are available off the shelf; as
mentioned, you can also use an Android phone or a Pi as a 'modem
As a matter of fact I see Jim Brain (who's behind Retro Innovations) from time
to time; he's quite well known in the Commodore (especially 64) world for his
many very reasonably priced adapters and various add-ons. There are also a
number of other folks building and selling various gizmos for Co
I'd love to have that 102 for parts to repair mine!
I'm in Toronto, Canada; please let me know if it's still available, and if so
how much you need.
Thank you in advance, and fingers crossed...
mike
- Original Message -
From: "David Anderson"
To:
Sent: Su
Quite a collection; a few on there that I hadn't seen before.
Thanks for sharing!
mike
- Original Message -
From: eddie edwards
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 1:13 AM
Subject: [M100] publications
I've been a collector of the M100 a
October 17, 2016 2:16 PM, Mike Stein wrote:
Looks like John beat me to it ;-)
Steve played with expanding the buffer a long time ago while we were playing
with the M100-on-the-Internet but never got it working 100% reliably, so we
ended up handling XON/XOFF in the bridge hard/software ins
I believe whether you see your own posts is an option in your account setup,
but I've also noticed that occasionally it doesn't seem to follow the rules
you've set.
m
- Original Message -
From: Steve Batson
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 12:15 AM
Sub
Looks like John beat me to it ;-)
Steve played with expanding the buffer a long time ago while we were playing
with the M100-on-the-Internet but never got it working 100% reliably, so we
ended up handling XON/XOFF in the bridge hard/software instead which could
respond instantly.
m
- Ori
AFAIK 64 is the global limit for all COM receives; XOFF is sent at 40
characters which is easily overrun, especially with a long turn-around time and
receiving a packet.
m
- Original Message -
From: Kurt McCullum
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 4:11 PM
So mComm1.7 AKA Setup17 is the latest Windows version , while mCommv141 is the
latest Android version?
- Original Message -
From: "Kurt McCullum"
To: "Mike Stein"
Cc: "Model 100 Discussion"
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [M1
I'm a little confused (what else is new ;-)
I thought the original point of mComm was that it could run headless and did
not require any client other than TELCOM on the M100. Is that a different/older
version, Windows vs. Android, or???
m
- Original Message -
From: "Kurt McCullum"
To
Well, there are really tiny converters like these, but you have to steal the
Vcc from one of the signals; note that the 3232 etc. have two of each RX & TX,
so you could hack a pair of control lines e.g RTS/CTS or DTR/DSR:
http://www.ebay.ca/itm/5Pcs-Mini-RS232-To-TTL-MAX3232-Converter-Adaptor-Mo
I don't have access to my 102 at the moment but I'd think that it wouldn't
be too difficult to swap the chip selects for M6 and M7, which should tell
you what's up.
m
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Josh Malone wrote:
> So, I've finally gotten back to the sage of the missing 8kB on my 102. The
27;d have to
disconnect the decoder from the SRAM to really see who's at fault, and if I'm
getting out my iron to work on M5 (the decoder) I may well replace the darned
thing since it's SMT.
>
> Guesses?
>
> Thanks again for everybody's help.
&g
pp. 7 & 8 of the Tech Ref:
ftp://ftp.whtech.com/club100/doc/m102TechReference.pdf
- Original Message -
From: Josh Malone
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2016 6:30 AM
Subject: Re: [M100] 32k M102 suddenly showing 24k
Once I figure out the memory map that wa
Have you tried one of the free text-to-pdf converters to see how it handles the
formatting codes?
BTW, I also sometimes use a P-S converter and it's probably not relevant for
you, but it's fairly trivial to simply redirect most programs' print output to
the com port...
m
- Original Messa
most likely place to start
looking for a bad chip? Any reason to suspect the NEC over the other 3 chips. I
don't recognize the logo (serif capital F with horizontal bars above and below).
Hope the large pictures go through. :-/
-Josh
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Mike Stein wro
*All* of them? Are you sure? Even the left-most one?
I always believed that there were only two models (in NA):
26-3801, an 8K base memory version with three expansion sockets, and
26-3802, a 24K base memory version with only one expansion socket.
What's your model (and serial) number?
m
Welcome and have fun!
By all means, tell us about those unmentionable "others"...
mike
- Original Message -
From: Marko Peussa
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] New guy here!
Welcome to the group and congratu
0] Adapter Board
Crap I'm sorry Mike!
But the question was about an option rom not the main rom. A dip28 chip just
about fills all available volume in the option rom socket. If you need to add
anything else to the board, it will be difficult. There is a little room on the
edge, and
So it's become *Stephen's* M100ROM board now? ;-)
I don't see any reason myself why you couldn't make a re-programmable Option
ROM adapter using a 27C256 EPROM but I'm not going to get into another
discussion; I am curious though why, with the various other options including
REX, you'd want one
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Stein"
To: "Model 100 Discussion"
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] Main rom using 28C256 plcc
- Original Message -
From: Brian White
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 7:26 P
Looks very nice; congratulations!
m
- Original Message -
From: Bill Nobel
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 8:54 PM
Subject: [M100] My 102 internals
Hey all,
So today I decided to pop the case on my recently acquired 32k 102. I wanted
to know t
- Original Message -
From: Brian White
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] Main rom using 28C256 plcc
> Anyway, good luck and have fun, but I'd appreciate if you could clarify for
> me the difference between soldering your adapter to the
6+SIP/exact_match=exact
Like this (the M100ROM being discussed elsewhere...):
m
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Adolph"
To: "Model 100 Discussion"
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:33 PM
Subject: [M100] low profile pins
> @Mike Stein
> Mike, can you repost th
- Original Message -
From: Mike Stein
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] Main rom using 28C256 plcc
---
...
As a matter of fact one of my early prototypes sort of did something like that:
a small board that had sockets for both a 32KB RAM
- Original Message -
From: John R. Hogerhuis
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] New command line tool for TPDD and TPDD2
On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Mike Stein wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John R. Hogerhuis
To: Model 100
Original Message -
From: Brian White
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] Main rom using 28C256 plcc
"Boy, you'll really go far out of the way just to avoid using a programming
adapter... ;-)"
Yes. Or a test clip.
Because I'm working on
- Original Message -
From: John R. Hogerhuis
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] New command line tool for TPDD and TPDD2
>The old disk utilities are not very good. If someone were to spend time on
>something I'd recommend someone write a
One more kick at the can:
- Original Message -
From: Brian White
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [M100] Main rom using 28C256 plcc
As I said, to each his/her own and we do have somewhat different goals and
perspectives.
My goal was to offe
ion.
I'll have to look at the original; looks like it only has an added SMT
transistor.
While I'm at it I'll try to refresh my dim memory about what mods are needed
(if any) for the programming adapter; ISTR that I only provided for the '512 ...
m
>
>
> On Thu,
Hi James,
Yup, a 9 pin to 25 pin F-F adapter is what you need.
Originally you would use a program called LAPDOS to format, copy files to/from
a PC etc., but AFAIK it does not play well with modern versions of Windows or
Linux/Mac OS's.:
http://www.club100.org/library/doc/lapdos.html
Also the
Boy, you'll really go far out of the way just to avoid using a programming
adapter... ;-)
Why not just a RAM chip? No external programming required at all.
Actually, Steve and I considered adding an SMT RAM chip underneath the M100ROM
EPROM socket but never finished it because of the SMT; maybe
Sheesh...
Lighten up!
m
- Original Message -
From: Brian White
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] Chipkunk drive system disk.
I said I was asking for someone else, not that they asked me to ask, or even
know that I did. I
Sorry; how is this any better than the M100ROM on Bitchin100?
You have to remove each M100s main board and unsolder the ROM socket? Aside
from any considerations of 'keeping it original' that's not everyone's cup of
tea, but if you really want to do that then of course you can do it with the
M1
For any DOS fans there's also a pretty good 2-port RS-232 logger called,
surprisingly, RS232...
- Original Message -
From: John R. Hogerhuis
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2016 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] Comms capture of TPDD2 boot disk creation
There's a
As a matter of fact I was thinking about making a RAM ExtRam clone (poor man's
REX ;-) and was wondering the same thing, how to avoid having to shear/grind
the edges.
How'd he do that?
m
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Adolph"
To: "Model 100 Discussion"
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2
d testing continuity from each "pin hole" for M18 (by
> comparing to my other 102) and surprisingly all the tracks have survived
> :) I'm going to fit a socket and re-test tomorrow.
>
> Thanks for the replies. I'll try to provide more information on the
> compone
Interesting...
What are the serial numbers of the two machines? Most of the 'old' M100s use a
board labelled PLX110CH1X; is yours a model meant for a market other than North
America by any chance?
Similarly, most of the T102s use a board labelled PLX144FH1X so again, I wonder
where yours came
IK you can install FLOPPY(.CO) (and TS-DOS) manually;
is that not enough?
m
- Original Message -
From: "Ron Wiesen"
To: "'Model 100 Discussion'"
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] New command line tool for TPDD and TPDD2
Hello Mike:
It's been a while since this was discussed but my recollection is that the disk
just has 'normal' files on it. There is of course a bootstrap *process*, which
is pretty well documented here (for example):
http://www.club100.org/library/libsup.html
Hopefully Steve will join the discussion...
m
- Original Message -
From: "Mark J. Blair"
To: "Model 100 Discussion Discussion"
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2016 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] New command line tool for TPDD and TPDD2
>> On May 22, 2016, at 18:05, Mike Stein wrote:
>
> Are the files fro
but I can only find
the FLOPPY.CO files.
I don't have a TPDD so maybe I'm missing something but I didn't think this was
a big problem...
mike
- Original Message -
From: Brian White
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2016 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] N
Excellent!
I think LAPDOS would have saved you some time and frustration but of course
like most of the 'classics' it needs a real or emulated MS-DOS system; I'm sure
that the TPDD owners will appreciate something that runs on a modern system.
m
- Original Message -
From: Gary Hamm
Thanks for posting those links. When I mentioned the various options for
adding/upgrading System and Option ROMs I wanted to include this one but at the
time the link at Oshpark didn't seem to work; I couldn't find any mention on
his Figtronix site either so I assumed they were no longer availab
How often we forget that not everyone knows the things we take for granted...
I suspect that this is the way everyone loaded programs back in 'the old days'
which is probably why the text-mode .BA files were normal and didn't cause
problems; kinda slow though, and you definitely want proper hand
Whether your posts are echoed back and whether you get confirmations are both
account options, but I've noticed that every now and then they seem to change
(actually, I don't think the settings change, but they are ignored). Some of
mine also changed a little while ago...
Account settings:
.. rs232 to ethernet
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Mike Stein wrote:
Hi John,
If you have a computer connected to the Internet that also has a serial
port there are programs that let the M100 think it's talking to an old-skool
modem while the PC translates things to Telnet o
. If there were a BBS that catered to the small screen
that would be ideal. But I have not found any that are 40x8.
Kurt
On 5/9/2016 7:53 PM, Gregory McGill wrote:
uds10 from lantronics, averaging about 20 bucks on ebay.. rs232 to ethernet
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Mi
100] Telnet BBS
uds10 from lantronics, averaging about 20 bucks on ebay.. rs232 to ethernet
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Mike Stein wrote:
Hi John,
If you have a computer connected to the Internet that also has a serial
port there are programs that let the M100 think it's tal
s a 'modem' to connect the M100 to the
net, and finally there are also hardware devices specifically for connecting
RS-232 devices like the M100 to the internet.
Maybe some other folks have some more ideas...
mike
- Original Message -
From: John Martin
To: m100@lists.bi
ne.
m
- Original Message -
From: Steven Ranft
To: Club 100 Model T
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] ROM burning questions
Hi Mike,
I would like to replace my system ROM with a Y2K compatible version.
I would like to install the best single option RO
Hi Steve,
Where to begin...
First of all, you're talking about two different and separate ROMs and their
sockets, the System ROM which runs the computer and provides the various
built-in applications, and an Option ROM which, as the name suggests, adds one
or more optional programs or features
might check out some
of the other stuff on bitchin100 while you're there.
Good luck!
mike
- Original Message -
From: John Martin
To: m100@lists.bitchin100.com
Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2016 7:02 PM
Subject: [M100] M100 list question
I have a TRS 80 Model 100. Usually
Ah yes, I forgot about Gmane; probably no need to change list archive access
since Gmane is publicly available and Google searches usually present any
relevant archived list posts through Gmane anyway.
I'm inclined to agree about the risks of fragmentation, but there are certainly
also benefits
Ah Duane... we old farts have missed you so...
Another reason to avoid the 'FACEBOOK M100 group'...
(j/k)
m
- Original Message -
From: Duane Adrian
To: m100@lists.bitchin100.com
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 6:38 PM
Subject: [M100] I am HAPPY there is a FACEBOOK M100 group
rested in that 'fix' if you get the
chance...
TIA,
m
- Original Message -
From: Ken Pettit
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2016 1:38 AM
Subject: Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question
Hi Mike,
No, nothing specific about REX ... EPROM would also work. But the media in
Ah, another addict! ;-) Nice to hear from ya!
We no longer have pennies up here in Canada, so it'll have to be my 5 cents
(not that that makes it worth any more than your 2 cents, especially with
today's exchange rate ;-)
Of course, spreading the word about this list is a good thing, wherever;
Let me try to salvage something from this 'discussion'; I certainly didn't mean
to start up a love/hate FB flamewar, I only wanted to say to William James the
OP that it's a shame that he didn't (also?) put his no doubt interesting stuff
on a site that everyone could access, not just FB members.
Hi Ken,
Why is this fix only available for TS-DOS from REX and not the TS-DOS (EP)ROM
(assuming of course that one has the means to (re)program the EPROM, which a
number of us do)? Are the contents different in some way?
m
- Original Message -
From: Ken Pettit
To: Model 100 Disc
Don't get your shorts in a knot, Gary; I merely said that it's a shame that he
chose Facebook to host his pictures instead of one of the many other sites
which do not require logging in and joining, thereby excluding a number of
folks like myself from seeing and presumably enjoying what he has t
A shame you chose to exclude those of us not on Facebook...
Oh well...
VE3IPK
- Original Message -
From: William James
To: m100@lists.bitchin100.com
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 4:19 PM
Subject: [M100] my Model 100 facebook group
Check out my retro portable computer grou
No problem; there's a fairly well-known conservative author/commentator named
Mark Steyn who's always getting into trouble so I wouldn't want to be confused
with him ;-)
mike
- Original Message -
From: Bill Nobel
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Thursday, April
for TS-DOS.
TS-DOS and its various servers do their own ACK/NAK kind of handshaking so
anything else should probably be disabled.
What exactly do you have between the M100 and Desklink that gives you
handshaking options?
mike
- Original Message -
From: Bill Nobel
To: Model 100
r the original.
mike (not mark ;-) stein
- Original Message -
From: Josh Malone
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] Mark Stein's ROM Board
Is this the board you're referring to:
http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.ph
Happy to hear it worked so well for you; enjoy! Guess I don't have to look up
the jumpers after all ;-)
Just curious why you're still running Desklink instead of John's LaddieAlpha?
BTW, the name's Mike, not Mark... ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Bill No
for this, although
smaller won't hurtunless you're also powering a DC receiver.
Just thought I'd share this with you guys. Most are already more astute
regarding our T's than average, so perhaps some newbies will benefit from this.
Enjoy de Mike
--
Mike Hamilton
t one
inadvertently put the EPROM in the wrong one...
Good luck!
m
- Original Message -
From: Bill Nobel
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 1:50 PM
Subject: [M100] Mike Stein's M100 Rom Adapter
Well the boards finally arrived from OSH Park. Can
An obsolete flow control method (only used by DEC AFAIK) using CTL-O (SI) and
CTL-N (SO) instead of CTL-S and CTL-Q (DC3 and DC1, AKA XOFF and XON), but SI
and SO were mainly used to select alternate character sets in printers.
http://www.nadcomm.com/?p=89
I'd say ignore it.
- Original Me
Ah, now that I did not know! So, does that make BT via Teeny slower or faster
than TS-DOS with its fixed timeouts? Inquiring minds need to know ;)
- Original Message -
From: John R. Hogerhuis
To: Model 100 Discussion
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] m
iscussion"
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 7:37 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] mComm for Android 1.4
> Wired connections work fine but if you are using a Bluetooth connection,
> you will need to use TEENY or TS-DOS with a delay put into it.
>
> Kurt
>
> On 4/3/2016 4:19 PM, Mike Ste
> ...as long as you use TEENY, REX or TS-DOS will delays.
???
- Original Message -
From: "Kurt McCullum"
To: "Model 100 Discussion"
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 7:06 PM
Subject: [M100] mComm for Android 1.4
>I just uploaded a new version of mComm for Android. The bluetooth
> connect
601 - 700 of 782 matches
Mail list logo
