Hi,
ext Philip Van Hoof wrote:
There are also other solutions for handling really large folders of more
than 15,000 items. The problem is not so much network bandwidth of the
envelopes. The problem is rather that each 5000th item the complete
summary storage file is rewritten on a relatively
Hi all,
I continue here a discussion you can find in this post:
http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/06/24/big-day-for-modest-and-tinymail
(Just read the comments).
This is my idea: I don't want to be able to download 15.000+ messages.
I just want to download ONLY last 50, 100, 200 at
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:24:24PM +0200, Andrea Grandi wrote:
I continue here a discussion you can find in this post:
http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/06/24/big-day-for-modest-and-tinymail
(Just read the comments).
snip
Please let me know what do you think about it.
I want all the
En/na Sergio Villar Senin ha escrit:
By the way, take into account the
screen size constraints in which Modest runs, a threaded view won't be
very useful in such a small screen.
Surely it is, at least I find it useful enough in claws.
You are right that you can't really see the whole thread,
Luca Olivetti escribiu:
En/na Sergio Villar Senin ha escrit:
By the way, take into account the
screen size constraints in which Modest runs, a threaded view won't be
very useful in such a small screen.
Surely it is, at least I find it useful enough in claws.
You are right that you can't
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 17:45 +0300, ext Eero Tamminen wrote:
Hi,
ext Niels Breet wrote:
It has been a while since we had a discussion about the future requirements
of the extras repository. Since there haven't been any concrete proposals
for what we can do for the short-term, I have made
En/na Philip Van Hoof ha escrit:
Polymer does a similar thing to Mulberry. The technique is indeed very
interesting and could be adapted to work with offline operations too, if
downloading is allowed to take place in the background and if when
scrolling up and down a higher priority task to
Hi all,
OS2008 Feature Upgrade[1], Maemo 4.1[2], Diablo, have been released and
now we need to enable the Extras repository. There has been a lot of talk
about how we can make the Diablo community repository better than the ones
we had before. I have submitted a proposal[3] for the Diablo
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 01:10:28 Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Polymer does a similar thing to Mulberry.
I also have some very large folders and I liked the Polymer approach a lot.
It is a shame the author doesn't have the time/resources to turn it into a
full-featured mail application.
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 10:00 +0100, Graham Cobb wrote:
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 01:10:28 Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Polymer does a similar thing to Mulberry.
I also have some very large folders and I liked the Polymer approach a lot.
It is a shame the author doesn't have the time/resources
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 10:48 +0200, Luca Olivetti wrote:
En/na Philip Van Hoof ha escrit:
Polymer does a similar thing to Mulberry. The technique is indeed very
interesting and could be adapted to work with offline operations too, if
downloading is allowed to take place in the background
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 09:43:31 Ed Bartosh wrote:
Now we have the same situation with rebuild. Niels is asking developers
to fix their packages, but I don't see much progress with this either.
We have only 10% more buildable packages for more than week of this
action.
A week is a long time
ext Graham Cobb wrote:
In my case, a big problem is dependencies which were previously uploaded into
Extras without sources. It would really help if you were to consider taking
those packages which do not have sources and just copying the chinook package
into diablo. Or, at least,
En/na Philip Van Hoof ha escrit:
either I couldn't find the option
or it doesn't even allow to select the sort order, neither it can thread
the messages.
That might be because your IMAP server doesn't support either THREAD nor
SORT.
sure it does:
$ telnet localhost 143
Trying
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 10:28 +0100, ext Graham Cobb wrote:
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 09:43:31 Ed Bartosh wrote:
Now we have the same situation with rebuild. Niels is asking developers
to fix their packages, but I don't see much progress with this either.
We have only 10% more buildable
Hi,
Just a couple of thoughts.
- It took me more than an hour to fix my package because I haven't
done this before, ever. Each new process is a learning curve for me.
I'm not complaining but I have to believe others are in positions
similar to mine.
- There was no deadline or goal date in the
ext Frank Banul wrote:
- There was no deadline or goal date in the original announcement.
People always procrastinate.
- Even the packages that do build aren't available (or weren't
yesterday) for the OS release. In my opinion, that's the wrong order.
Get the extras available then release
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 10:47:47 Quim Gil wrote:
- What are the dependency packages you need to put in place or fix?
Don't answer here, go to the wiki and start the list. Rest of developers
in the same situation than Graham, add your problematic packages to the
list.
List started:
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 12:12:02 Ed Bartosh wrote:
My opinion that tt's about 2 men days work to fix all build failures.
Niels can tell how many people uploaded packages to extras. And you can
see how many of them actually care to fix build failures. If each of
them would spend 1(one) hour
On Wed Jun 25 10:23:44 2008, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 10:00 +0100, Graham Cobb wrote:
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 01:10:28 Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Polymer does a similar thing to Mulberry.
I also have some very large folders and I liked the Polymer
approach a lot.
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 16:31 +0100, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Wed Jun 25 10:23:44 2008, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
My biggest problem with Modest has always been that the UI
requirements seem to have driven the development, to the extent that
although Tinymail is pretty good, both its
En/na Dave Cridland ha escrit:
Tinymail is good - if Luca upgrades his IMAP server to Cyrus 2.3, he'll
see a big speed increase from both Modest and Polymer, I think.
I'm too old for that, now I stick with whatever version comes with the
distro.
However mulberry manages quite well with my
Hi there.
I realise diablo is now live, and am trying to upload some packages to
the extras-devel repository.
It looks like now, the step to follow are:
http://extras-cauldron.garage.maemo.org/HOWTO.html#what-to-expect-as-a-result
Upload seems to work, compilation too, but for an unkown reason,
Hello!
This is all good, but I don't think it makes sense to do in now.
The main problem with extras for now are the maintainers' attitude.
There were a lot of discussions about extras previously on this list and
no real actions were done by community.
I don't think it is fair to blame the
On Jun 23, 2008, at 3:36 AM, Frantisek Dufka wrote:
D. Scott Brown wrote:
3. extract the rootfs from the retail image, mount it, and tar it.
If I mount the JFFS2 using kernel memory emulating a MTD, I get
error inserting mtdram - cannot allocate memory. If I mount the
JFFS2 using
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:31:28AM +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 00:57 +0300, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:24:24PM +0200, Andrea Grandi wrote:
I continue here a discussion you can find in this post:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:25:18AM +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 10:48 +0200, Luca Olivetti wrote:
I'm currently tunneling imap through ssh with compression enabled.
That's a good temporary solution indeed. Note that your SSL layer might
already do compression, in
27 matches
Mail list logo
