server is too slow to respond to hoststated
> and that the digest is done on incomplete data, please run hoststated
> with "-dv" to verify this assumption.
Thanks Pierre-Yves,
They were connect timeouts as you suspected. Just didn't notice it
before in the log. I appreciate
well I am giving up with my ideas that are not working I will just keep my
eyes open for a prebuilt one on line at ebay that shiping is not to much.
- Original Message -
From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 5:45
what is the nut list
- Original Message -
From: "bofh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] Org"
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: Recommendation for a UPS
On 4/15/07, bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or, find an old ups with a serial port, make sure it's on th
Boudewijn Ector wrote:
Boudewijn Ector wrote:
The ";" at the end here means that the WRAP BIOS said it could not do
LBA reads, so biosboot fell back to CHS reads.
No O/S
And since you installed on a different machine, the geometry was
almost certainly different, so the operating syste
arched and read a lot of documents re: BSD
support for such devices, but it seems a lot of people are only having success
with speeds up to 11Mbps.
I am looking to get specific makes and models of minipci cards please!
Thanks for your feedback.
Regards,
Dave
this output, but I don't understand what would
have changed; I have not had this output before. The configuration
files have not changed either.
/var/log/daemon
Apr 28 06:16:55 puffy pppd[5388]: pppd 2.3.5 started by dave, uid 0
Apr 28 06:17:06 puffy pppd[5388]: Serial connection established.
A
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:20:07 -0700
From: dave
To: misc@openbsd.org
Hi there,
For the last two snapshots, I have started receiving the following
output in /var/log/daemon:
Apr 28 06:17:07 puffy pppd[5388]: Couldn't set device to non-blocking
mode: Inappropriate ioctl for device
A search o
art your update by installing the latest snapshot, then and
only then, cvs -CURRENT (and follow Oga's instructions)?
Dave
x27;NO
ANSWER'
'' 'ATE1' # thanks Didier!
TIMEOUT 30
'' AT+CFUN=1\r\d\c # wait until the modem echoes '+PACSP0'
'+PACSP0' # chat(8) says '/d' '/c' not valid for 'expect'
'AT+CGDCONT=1,"IP","isp.cingular"'
OK 'ATDT*99***1#' 'CONNECT' \c
Thank you all for helping!
Didier
Your welcome!
Dave
This is for the archives.
'' 'ATE1'
Turns out this is neither needed to debug the chat script nor needed in
the final script:
TIMEOUT 30
'' AT+CFUN=1\r\d\c # wait until the modem echoes '+PACSP0'
'+PACSP0' # chat(8) says '/d' '/c' not valid for 'expect'
GNU compiler collection: C++ compiler library
Is this an error I can fix myself?
If yes, how?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
On Wednesday 04 May 2005 01:06 pm, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 12:17:51PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
>
> >/home/daf/Chuck/Testh}pkg_info -a | grep 3.3.2
> >g++-3.3.2 GNU compiler collection: C++ compiler
> >gcc-3.3.2
For the OpenBSD experts on this list:
Can the malware at Gookle.com described at the link
crack OpenBSD and/or Konqueror?
(I am far from an expert, so I practice 'better safe
than sorry' when I see f-secure's explicit warnings).
http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/googkle.shtml
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
On Sunday 08 May 2005 10:27 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 10:00:07AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > For the OpenBSD experts on this list:
> >
> > Can the malware at Gookle.com described at the link
> > crack OpenBSD and/or Konqueror?
> &g
On Monday 09 May 2005 09:16 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2005 11:00 am, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > Can the malware at Gookle.com described at the link
> > crack OpenBSD and/or Konqueror? (I am far from an expert, so I practice
> > 'better safe
> > t
Is there any straightforward way to
block email from locations that whois shows
to have been created by doubleclick.com?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
It appears that 3.7 uses kde version 3.2.3.
Were there problems upgrading to a newer
version of kde?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
The file ftp://rt.fm/pub/OpenBSD/3.7/PACKAGES
shows the 3.7 kde packages as being version 3.2.3.
I suspect this is an error.
Dave Feustel
On Thursday 19 May 2005 04:44 pm, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:31:40PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > It appears that 3.7 uses kde version 3.2.3.
> > Were there problems upgrading to a newer
> > version of kde?
>
> First, you're dyslexic. It'
A link to a pdf file with complete Pacifica cpu virtualization
details (except for what sockets are supported) is
http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/33047.pdf
Dave Feustel
not appear to be the case.
xpdf, kword and gnumeric still print correctly.
Should I just switch to a different spreadsheet? (Recommendations).
I will upgrade to 3.7 as soon as I can afford to.
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
I am getting ready to upgrade my computer system.
What AMD64x2 motherboards do readers of this
mailing list recommend for use with OpenBSD?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
On Monday 30 May 2005 11:13 am, you wrote:
> > I am getting ready to upgrade my computer system.
> > What AMD64x2 motherboards do readers of this
> > mailing list recommend for use with OpenBSD?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dave Feustel
>
> I bought an TYAN S2882.
.
Has anyone else seen this error while printing?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
gt; That's true. After Marc's and Chris' allready convinced me, I ordered
> it this morning, and Wim allready wrote that he'll ship it tomorrow.
>
> Thank you all for your quick answers.
>
> Ciao,
> Kili
Is there a wim webpage or other contact info?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
I have an immediate need for detection of physical intrusion.
I would like to have a webcam take and save pictures to disk
when there is motion detected in the camera's field of view.
Is this doable right now with OpenBSD?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
message you sent with the following header fields:
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 09:02:45 -0500
From: Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gordon Grieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Security WebCams
Your message cannot be delivere
Are there any USA dealers recommended?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
g environment.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark T. Uemura
> OpenBSD Support Japan Inc.
> www.openbsd-support.com
This is a Very Nicely Done Presentation!
Dave Feustel
I am having a LOT of problems with
formatting/previewing/printing in GnuMeric on 3.6.
Clicking on the gnumeric home page button produces
an error. Where do I report bugs?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
Never Mind. Sorry for the dumb question.
On Monday 06 June 2005 03:08 pm, Dave Feustel wrote:
> I am having a LOT of problems with
> formatting/previewing/printing in GnuMeric on 3.6.
> Clicking on the gnumeric home page button produces
> an error. Where do I report bugs?
>
&
.
I don't know where the problem lies, but this makes
my printer unusable. I used to have this problem when I
printed kde files before I installed aps1, but not since then
until now.
What command shows the names of files in the print queue?
(I've looked but just can't find it)
Dave Feustel
buggy. The rest of gnumeric is working well for me.
Unfortunately, I use a lot of hardcopy records every day on
my delivery route so the print problems are a serious impediment.
> Also lprm might be useful for you for the next little while :)
>
> Stephan
>
> On 6/9/05, Dave Feustel
he printer
since I started printing with the aps filter.
But I will add the -h option to my alias for lpr.
Thanks,
Dave
I want to build a new version of gnumeric to run on 3.6.
The config program says pkg-config (0.3.0) is too old
and that it should be at least 0.9.0. Man pkg-config and
apropos pkg-config return nothing.
Can I upgrade pkg-config from package pkgconfig-0.15.0.tgz?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
s gnumeric running
on 3.7 significantly better (ie crashes less during pdf file creation)
than the gnumeric version running on 3.6?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
business
related computing/printing tasks may well have to be done on Windows.
Dave Feustel
On Monday 13 June 2005 05:02 pm, eric wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 16:49:14 -0500, Dave Feustel proclaimed...
>
> > I am beginning to think *very* seriously about using a Windows computer
> > *just* to run MS Excel so I can get reliably and straightforwardly the hard
&g
On Monday 13 June 2005 05:14 pm, Adam wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:15:26 -0500
> Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The gnumeric developers assert that gnumeric is 'stable'
> > ie rarely crashes. Yet my experience is that gnumeric crashes
> &
On Monday 13 June 2005 05:38 pm, Gupni ^sr Bjvrgvinsson wrote:
> Dave Feustel wrote:
> > I write this as a person very committed to OpenBSD as a secure desktop.
> >
> > I can say from experience that, running with KDE, neither Kspread nor
> > Gnumeric
> > on O
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 04:47 am, Jon Drews wrote:
> On 6/13/05, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes. Note that my problem is not printing pdf files, it is creating pdf
> > files
> > from within gnumeric.
> >
>
> OK, these are the dep
On Monday 13 June 2005 06:10 pm, Jon Drews wrote:
> On 6/13/05, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The gnumeric developers assert that gnumeric is 'stable'
> > ie rarely crashes. Yet my experience is that gnumeric crashes
> > *frequently* while attempt
On Monday 13 June 2005 08:15 pm, Alec Berryman wrote:
> Dave Feustel on 2005-06-13 17:59:14 -0500:
>
> > > What about OpenOffice on OpenBSD? *ducks*
> >
> > It's too big for me to even try to port.
>
> I've never tried it under Linux emulation, but
On Monday 13 June 2005 06:55 pm, eric wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 00:58:10 +0200, Bram Van Dam proclaimed...
>
> > Because that's not a spreadsheet? Your information is about as useless
> > as his.
>
> Funny..lemme check here...
>
> From dict.org...
>
> "spreadsheet
>n : a screen-or
On Monday 13 June 2005 07:58 pm, chefren wrote:
> Hello Dave,
>
> > I am beginning to think *very* seriously about using a Windows computer
> > *just* to run MS Excel so I can get reliably and straightforwardly the hard
> > copy I need. Neither gnumeric nor kspread runnin
On Monday 13 June 2005 05:58 pm, Jon Drews wrote:
> On 6/13/05, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can say from experience that, running with KDE, neither Kspread nor
> > Gnumeric
> > on OpenBSD 3.6 are useable (by me, at least) for hard copy of even simple
&
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 10:00 pm, Christer Solstrand Johannessen wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Dave Feustel wrote:
>
> [mac mini+ms office:mac]
>
> > I have been thinking about getting a Mac.
> > I hadn't considered a mini, but that is an
> > intriguing idea. W
don't want to use
NAT-T ...
anyone got any ideas ? is this a simple conf problem ? help ?
isakmpd output, and conf files are transcribed below
Cheers
Dave
Server side :
--
isakmpd output :
115833.011175 Timr 10 timer_add_event: event
exchange_free_aux(0x3c
Stephen Marley wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 01:34:06PM +1000, Dave Harrison wrote:
I just upgraded my firewall to 3.7, but I've found my VPN is now not
working. I keep seeing "NAT detected" messages, but both machines have
real IPs so it doesn't make sense. The cli
http://www.amecisco.com/faq_hardwarekeylogger.htm#Q1
On Sunday 19 June 2005 08:51 pm, Nick Holland wrote:
> Dave Feustel wrote:
> > http://www.amecisco.com/faq_hardwarekeylogger.htm#Q1
>
> This has nothing to do with OpenBSD.
> It isn't new.
> It isn't unique.
> In effect, you just spammed the list, advertising
On Sunday 19 June 2005 07:24 pm, Greg Thomas wrote:
> On 6/19/05, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.amecisco.com/faq_hardwarekeylogger.htm#Q1
> >
> >
>
> Why just new ones? Do you think this device is new or something?
>
> Greg
On Monday 20 June 2005 12:33 am, Chris Zakelj wrote:
> Dave Feustel wrote:
>
> >I thought you had more insight. All of OpenBSD's security is at risk with
> >this technology.
> >
> The security features of an OS will not stop a physical attack, no
> matter how w
On Monday 20 June 2005 12:52 am, Brett Lymn wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:06:02AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> >
> > So far I see no defense against this spying
> > technique of password capture.
> >
>
> Regardless of whether they are built in or not -
On Monday 20 June 2005 12:43 am, Chris Zakelj wrote:
> Dave Feustel wrote:
>
> >The device is obviously not new. What *is* new is that it is being installed
> >as oem equipment inside of keyboards for HP and Dell systems and also inside
> >of 'used keyboards which
On Monday 20 June 2005 01:26 am, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
> I thought that might have a brain.
>
> All of OpenBSD's security at risk? How, in your wildest chemically
> induced dreams, could it be?
This rejoinder does not deserve a response and will get none from me.
Grow Up.
On Monday 20 June 2005 06:36 am, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:07:13AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > On Sunday 19 June 2005 08:51 pm, Nick Holland wrote:
> > > Dave Feustel wrote:
> > > > http://www.amecisco.com/faq_hardwarekeylogger.htm#Q1
>
On Monday 20 June 2005 12:23 am, Timothy A. Napthali wrote:
> I'm fairly sure this is a hoax. I have seen this referenced several
> times over the past few weeks and I have seen no evidence to indicate
> and truth to the matter.
Here is a relevant link:
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.c
On Monday 20 June 2005 01:32 am, Ben Hooper wrote:
> |>I thought you had more insight. All of OpenBSD's security is
> |at risk with
> |>this technology.
> |>
> |The security features of an OS will not stop a physical attack, no
> |matter how well designed. This is no different than the admin lea
On Monday 20 June 2005 06:06 am, Nick Holland wrote:
> Building a keyboard logger into a keyboard is nothing new. We put one
> in your keyboard two years ago. :)
Good thing I replaced the keyboard twice since then. :-)
But wait a minute! I might have bought a replacement
keyboard which already h
On Monday 20 June 2005 07:17 am, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 07:08:18AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > If one-time passwords capability is built into OpenBSD, where can I read
> > about
> > how to use them?
>
> RTFM comes to mind.
>
> aprop
On Monday 20 June 2005 07:14 am, Chris Zakelj wrote:
> Dave Feustel wrote:
>
> >If you read the FAQ carefully you would note that the keylogger chip is
> >now being installed in oem equipment for the company marketing the keyboard.
> >Buying a unit off the shelf does not
On Monday 20 June 2005 08:14 am, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Dave Feustel wrote:
>
> > > One Time Passwords such as skey(1) are also good for insecure
> > > environments.
> > >
> > > Ben.
> >
> > I just read the man
On Monday 20 June 2005 08:05 am, Alexander Bochmann wrote:
> ...on Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 07:24:16AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
>
> > Here is a relevant link:
> > http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=73190
>
> That's just the same thing all over.
&
On Monday 20 June 2005 10:43 am, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
> On Monday, June 20, Dave Feustel wrote:
> >
> > I just read the man page for skey, but I still don't quite understand
> > how it works. Would I use a calculator to generate a response that I
> > type in
On Monday 20 June 2005 07:29 am, Jeremy Bowen wrote:
> On Monday 20 June 2005 11:55 pm, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > If you read the FAQ carefully you would note that the keylogger chip is
> > now being installed in oem equipment for the company marketing the
> > keyboard. Buying
;reset" my connection with them, but still
not change to my situation - and I can only reset my modem so many times
before I go insane ;-)
Anything anyone can spot that might help me sort this out ? I even
tried the kernel based pppoe device, but no joy there either.
Cheers
Dave
nection with them, but still
not change to my situation - and I can only reset my modem so many times
before I go insane ;-)
Anything anyone can spot that might help me sort this out ? I even
tried the kernel based pppoe device, but no joy there either.
Cheers
Dave
Hi everyone,
I've been using a cron file (shown below) for some years and it references
the atrun command. It appears that the atrun command no longer exists as
the man pages no longer reference it.
Is there a replacement for the atrun command or is there a means to add it
to my system?
Below i
am available.
Has anyone heard anything about any worms or DOS attacks happening which
might account for this? The problems predominantly happen late evening or
in the middle of the night.
Thanks,
Dave
ing.
Seems reasonable to inquire about OBSD when I'm having a problem that sounds
like it might possibly be related, doesn't it?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jason Crawford
> Sent: Thursday, June 30
here and the problem starts looking like my system I will
continue working on it.
I just thought it wise to poke my head out of the box for a minute and look
around. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 12:54 PM
> -Original Message-
> From: eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 2:25 PM
> To: Dave Beckstrom
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: DOS Attacks?
>
> On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 13:32:04 -0500, Dave Beckstrom proclaimed...
>
> > Ma
Greg,
I believe the problem has already been solved thanks to some help from a
gentleman who sent me some information privately.
I won't know for certain for a day or two but I am optimistic.
I want to thank the people who responded with some suggestions for debugging
and things to try.
I'm g
That line generated an "atrun not found" error message. I assume that means
that line needs to be modified to work with at. If so, what should it look
like?
> -Original Message-
> From: Hugo Villeneuve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005
> > Actually, I posed a great question for a "misc" list whereas you on the
> > other hand are wasting everyone's time including mine. If you
> successfully
> > make it through puberty let's talk again in a few years... I have a
> hunch
> > you might be the next Darwin award winner. LOL
>
> I k
rs to] any information on how
to figure out what's really happening would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Dave
The full dmesg is:
OpenBSD 3.7 (GENERIC) #50: Sun Mar 20 00:01:57 MST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel Pentium (P54C) ("GenuineInt
** Reply to message from "Todd C. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Sat, 09 Jul 2005 18:55:03 -0600
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> so spake "Dave Anderson" (dave):
>
>> If I'm reading it correctly, this bit of the dmesg says that my hard
that first 504M,
>the system will boot without problem or delay, as it won't try to detect
>the disk parameters at all, and OpenBSD will properly detect the entire
>disk.
Thanks for the detailed info, and especially for this hint -- which I
will certainly try.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ch daemon.
Are there any other solutions people can think of ? Is there an option
I don't know about ?
Cheers for your help,
Dave
I don't seem to receive a copy of the mail I sent to misc@ via the list.
I have the "selfcopy" option enabled for all the lists I'm subscribed
to, and my account isn't catching those mails as spam etc.
Any ideas ?
sure it makes sense to stop and learn yet
another language *right* *now*. If this *is* the way to go,
recommendations as to the "best" language for general sysadmin-type
scripting would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance for any advice,
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
** Reply to message from Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 14 Jul
2005 16:15:11 +0200 (CEST)
>On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Dave Anderson wrote:
>
>> It also, at least under OpenBSD, has the serious problem that "$$"
>> isn't the PID of the shell runni
at is a copy of the current
>environment environment.
>
>It is wrong to assume using (...) will actually create a new process.
*That* was not at all obvious (at least to me), and is important to
know.
Thanks!
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1) add the line
umask 077
to .profile
2)add the file .kshrc containing at least the line
set -o vi
Also modify adduser so that the home directory
permissions of new users are set to drwx--
instead of drwxr-xr-x
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 04:23 pm, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:13:01PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> | 1) add the line
> | umask 077
> | to .profile
>
> This breaks certain ports (as I found out the hard way)
>
> | 2)add the file .kshrc containing a
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 04:23 pm, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:13:01PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> | 1) add the line
> | umask 077
> | to .profile
>
> This breaks certain ports (as I found out the hard way)
I was wondering about that. Which ports broke?
Thanks,
Dave
On Thursday 28 July 2005 10:09 am, Moritz Grimm wrote:
> And
> there are also still numerous ways of breaking OpenBSD inspite of sane
> defaults and exploit mitigation techniques in place.
Is there any way I can tell whether my system has been broken as you describe?
On Thursday 28 July 2005 11:24 am, Moritz Grimm wrote:
> Dave Feustel wrote:
> >>And
> >>there are also still numerous ways of breaking OpenBSD inspite of sane
> >>defaults and exploit mitigation techniques in place.
> >
> > Is there any way I can tel
> suggested /etc/skel/ modifications
The reason I proposed a umask of 077 is that I discovered just a few
files scattered through my directories with owner:group of root:daf (I'm daf,
the only user of this system). All the other files in my directories are
daf:daf,
and I cannot imagine any scena
On Friday 29 July 2005 07:40 am, b h wrote:
> Hi,
>
> before I install openbsd on my laptop, I was curious
> if there is any method of getting wireless working
> with my companies infrastructure. I have the intel
> 2915a/b/g card, and only Cisco extensions and LEAP
> authentication is supported (
to the cdrom case.
That was a very pleasant surprise!
Dave Feustel
expected result when cut-and-pasted to a command line.
Any constructive comments would be greatly appreciated.
Dave
The results:
match = '/var/log/pf/103790/*'
files[0] = '/var/log/pf/103790/ne3.in.block.destIP'
files[1] = '/var/log/pf/103790/ne3.in.block
set -i idx
idx=0
while [ idx -lt ${#files[*]} ] ; do
echo "files[$idx] = '${files[$idx]}'"
idx=idx+1
done
return 0
}
set -o posix
DoIt "/var/log/pf/103790/*"
echo ""
DoIt
"/var/log/pf/103790/+([a-zA-Z])+([0-9]).@(in|out).@(block|pass).@(de
** Reply to message from Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 3 Aug
2005 14:51:09 +0200 (CEST)
>On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Dave Anderson wrote:
>
>> Something's screwy here, using the 'set -A' command in /bin/sh on
>> 3.7-release. AFAICT the complicated f
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 01:15 pm, Jim O'Donald wrote:
> Using your example of a power supply lasting 10 years, that would
> translate to 2 failures in 10 years, not 1 failure in 5 years.
And if the box is properly designed, it will continue running unless both
power supplies fail simultaneousl
is probably of no interest to Openbsd developers.
But it *will* make possible running a gaggle of copies of OpenBSD
(eg OpenBSD 3.6, 3.7, and 3.8) simultaneously on a single computer. :-)
Look for AMD chips implementing Pacifica sometime in 2006(Q1?).
Dave Feustel
Ed,
Ever read anything about MIT's Multics and the GE 645?
appearing into the dustbin of history.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Dave Feustel
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 4:05 PM
> To: Theo de Raadt
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: x86 rin
On Thursday 04 August 2005 06:24 pm, Roger Neth Jr wrote:
> Hello, I have been reading this thread as of some interest that I have read
> some stuff on rings.
> Are you able to elaborate on C programming and Unix incompatible with x86.
Not with x86, but with x86 segmentation. Note that segments
1 - 100 of 703 matches
Mail list logo
