On May 14, 2009, at 9:25 AM, BSD nuub wrote:
On this page, there's something that bothers me:
Please note that, though Samba account information will be stored in
LDAP, smbd(8) will still obtain the user's UNIX account information
via the standard C library calls, such as getpwnam() (see
I recall seeing in the samba docs that setting the account info in
samba could optionally also add the entries on the unix side - meaning
you only need to set set it once. I'm hazy on the details, perhaps look
into alternatives to using LDAP. When I've done this I've always
entered them
Quoting Paul M l...@no-tek.com:
I recall seeing in the samba docs that setting the account info in
samba could optionally also add the entries on the unix side - meaning
you only need to set set it once. I'm hazy on the details, perhaps look
into alternatives to using LDAP. When I've done
Henning Brauer(lists-open...@bsws.de)@2009.01.06 14:42:09 +0100:
* Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net [2009-01-06 12:25]:
openldap is still a piece of shit, but the ldbm backend is probably the
sanest one.
This pattern comes up often, but almost noone suggests an alternative
LDAP
* dan-openbsd-m...@ourbrains.org dan-openbsd-m...@ourbrains.org [2009-01-16
19:38]:
Henning Brauer(lists-open...@bsws.de)@2009.01.06 14:42:09 +0100:
I am not aware of any. Lack of options doesn't make openldap better.
There is an option for people who have very basic LDAP needs - tinyldap
Henning Brauer(lists-open...@bsws.de)@2009.01.06 14:42:09 +0100:
I am not aware of any. Lack of options doesn't make openldap better.
There is an option for people who have very basic LDAP needs - tinyldap
from fefe.de. It's high quality but lacks many features at the time.
On Tue, 06.01.2009 at 06:27:17 -0500, ppruett-lists ppru...@webengr.com wrote:
Actually a lot linux users suggest using mysql for the non relational
authentication tables
;)
I knew you've got to be kidding!
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
openldap better.
agreed, but it makes bashing openldap sort of futile.
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
checked the libc
btree code, a crash while writing out a page split would corrupt the
subtree.
I am using openldap with ldbm backend in an not exactly small
installation for 9 or 10 years now. I have never ever experienced a
broken database. never.
I second that,
5+ years of ldbm backend
Here's an untested tarball of an updated openldap port, split into
directories for 2.3 and 2.4: http://spacehopper.org/tmp/openldap.tgz
This issue has been kicked around for maybe two years, it has been on
the misc list before,
https://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2007/5/20
This pattern comes up often, but almost noone suggests an alternative
LDAP server package
Actually a lot linux users suggest using mysql for the non relational
authentication tables
;)
Hi,
On Tue, 06.01.2009 at 01:08:27 +0100, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de
wrote:
I am using openldap with ldbm backend in an not exactly small
installation for 9 or 10 years now. I have never ever experienced a
broken database. never.
my last encounter with ldbm, a few years back, drove
Moving this to po...@. Reply-To/MFT set, please honour it.
On 2009/01/06 06:11, ppruett-lists wrote:
Here's an untested tarball of an updated openldap port, split into
directories for 2.3 and 2.4: http://spacehopper.org/tmp/openldap.tgz
This issue has been kicked around for maybe two
* Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net [2009-01-06 12:25]:
openldap is still a piece of shit, but the ldbm backend is probably the
sanest one.
This pattern comes up often, but almost noone suggests an alternative
LDAP server package.
I am not aware of any. Lack of options doesn't make
Damn, forgot to send my response to list:
Message-ID: 49624a88.3020...@raapid.net
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:59:36 -0600
From: tico tico-o...@raapid.net
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: P.Pruett ppru...@webengr.com
Subject: Re: OpenLDAP w/o bdb okay
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:30 AM, P.Pruett ppru...@webengr.com wrote:
For OpenBSD 4.4 and current the flavor bdb is broken on openldap
BROKEN=OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
Most past articles have strongly suggested haveing openldap use bdb
as its storage method. Seeing
concerned that The LDBM
backend is now obsolete for openldap since 2.4.12.
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200810/msg00154.html
For OpenBSD 4.4 and current the flavor bdb is broken on openldap
BROKEN=OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
So, what to do? My experience is that compiling BDB and OpenLDAP
yourself isn't hard,
yep, I remember compiling apache back in the middle 90's
For security
For OpenBSD 4.4 and current the flavor bdb is broken on openldap
BROKEN=OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
Most past articles have strongly suggested haveing openldap use bdb
as its storage method. Seeing that even the current port is not ready
to implement OpenLDAP 2.4
bdb could be okay,
but as an afore mentioned in this thread I am concerned that The LDBM
backend is now obsolete for openldap since 2.4.12.
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200810/msg00154.html
And do you think that your bdb based database will work over an update?
I think I had
P.Pruett wrote:
For OpenBSD 4.4 and current the flavor bdb is broken on openldap
BROKEN=OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
Most past articles have strongly suggested haveing openldap use bdb
as its storage method. Seeing that even the current port is not ready
to implement
On 2009-01-05, ppruett-lists ppru...@webengr.com wrote:
So choices for those with older openbsd port of openldap with bdb flavor
are:
* don't upgrade ( bad choice)
* upgrade to openbsd 4.4 or current using the official port and renter
data storing in the obsolete backend ldbm (ughhh
OpenLDAP has any databases
that will satisfy you.
Philip Guenther
btree code, a crash while writing out a page split would corrupt the
subtree.
I am using openldap with ldbm backend in an not exactly small
installation for 9 or 10 years now. I have never ever experienced a
broken database. never.
trying bdb lead to disasters all over the place. but admittedly
On 10/23/08, Almir Karic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
most likelly /usr/local/sbin is not in your root's PATH, do
PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/sbin as root and slaptest should be found.
Would you kindly demonstrate a foolproof root's ~/.profile, since I
wasn't able to figure the lines to do it
sudo which slaptest will tell you where in your PATH slaptest is. add that to
your root's PATH and it will work.
also, depending on you are invoking the root shell .profile might not be
executed at all.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:42:10AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/23/08, Almir Karic
Mazzechio
http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/pdc/ and I'm facing a strange
problem I'm not able to figure. Following the instructions, upon
configuration of /etc/openldap/slapd.conf, I'm not able to execute
slaptest -u as root, but once I'm logged as user, sudo slaptest -u
executes and config file test
I've been trying to set OpenBSD 4.3 (release) primary domain
controller according to howto o Danielle Mazzechio
http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/pdc/ and I'm facing a strange
problem I'm not able to figure. Following the instructions, upon
configuration of /etc/openldap/slapd.conf, I'm not able
Dear members list,
i would like to know if openldap (in ports collection) will be shipped
with suport for BDB in openbsd 4.4 ports infra structure?
Thanks a lot for your time and cooperation.
Best regards,
John.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:33 PM, John Nietzsche
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i would like to know if openldap (in ports collection) will be shipped
with suport for BDB in openbsd 4.4 ports infra structure?
Since the release is frozen, UTSL:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/databases
--- On Wed, 9/3/08, Philip Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Philip Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OpenLDAP
To: John Nietzsche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc misc@openbsd.org
Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 6:00 PM
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:15 AM, John Nietzsche
[EMAIL
to pollute the archives
rather than help.
.if ${FLAVOR:L:Mbdb}
BROKEN= OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
If you want to use bdb as a backend, you'll likely have to compile
OpenLDAP manually (see Philip Guenther's earlier post [2] in this
thread, for instance
Hi,
is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
Thanks in advance.
* John Nietzsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-03 13:22]:
is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
I'd say the chance of ever having an unbroken OpenLDAP release on any
OS is pretty damn low.
that said, openldap works as well on openbsd as it does on other oses
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:15 AM, John Nietzsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
Thanks in advance.
And how is it broken exactly? I was able to install it just a month
ago and I didn't see anything obviously wrong.
-Nick
I am in need for performance. Is replacing bdb with ldbm a good ideia?
Thanks once more.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* John Nietzsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-03 13:22]:
is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:15 AM, John Nietzsche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
Since openbsd doesn't include ldap, I would guess that any (future
On 9/3/08, John Nietzsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am in need for performance. Is replacing bdb with ldbm a good ideia?
Is working faster than not working?
release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
I'd say the chance of ever having an unbroken OpenLDAP release on any
OS is pretty damn low.
that said, openldap works as well on openbsd as it does on other oses.
the only thing that does not work in 4.4 is the bdb backend. but then,
the bdb backend has almost
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:15 AM, John Nietzsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
I presume you're referring to the port/packages version. The answer
depends on whose definition of unbroken you prefer.
The last word I heard from
Hi list,
i have just installed OpenBSD and i would like to use it (the server
with OpenBSD) as a directory services. When i try to install openldap
from ports i am prevented with the following message:
=== openldap-client-2.3.39 is marked as broken: OpenLDAP 2.3 is
incompatible with Berkeley DB
On 2008-09-02, John Nietzsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have just installed OpenBSD and i would like to use it (the server
with OpenBSD) as a directory services. When i try to install openldap
from ports i am prevented with the following message:
=== openldap-client-2.3.39 is marked
/pdc2.html but I cannot get
openldap-server to build from the ports, because the bdb flavor is
marked broken in 4.3! In the tutorial, he just continues on without
explaining what to do. What ought I do to get openldap-server to
build?
Thank you very much for your patience and time.
Ross Tucker
Thanks for the bandwidth.
Ross
On 2008-08-14, Ross Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to set my new OpenBSD 4.3 installation up as a PDC for a
windows network. I am following directions from
http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/pdc/pdc2.html but I cannot get
openldap-server to build from the ports, because the bdb
--- On Tue, 8/5/08, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: slapd hangs, was: Re: OpenLDAP and Berkeley DB 4.6
To: Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
ports@, and CC the maintainer (in this case, me).
TIA!
openldap
. Maybe it has something to do that the server in question runs
as a syncrepl client together with TLS (master is
openldap-server-2.3.33p1-bdb on 4.2). In any case, the only way to get
slapd down seems to be to kill -9 it, which is _very_ugly_ for other
reasons. My other slapd instances don't have
that now, slapd can't be
stopped. Maybe it has something to do that the server in question runs
as a syncrepl client together with TLS (master is
openldap-server-2.3.33p1-bdb on 4.2). In any case, the only way to get
slapd down seems to be to kill -9 it, which is _very_ugly_ for other
reasons. My
--On Sunday, March 09, 2008 11:13 PM +0800 Dongsheng Song
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible[1] with Berkeley DB 4.6,
so I must stick to BDB 4.5 or upgrade to OpenLDAP 2.4 ?
Yes.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Since OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible[1] with Berkeley DB 4.6,
so I must stick to BDB 4.5 or upgrade to OpenLDAP 2.4 ?
[1] http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/databases/openldap/Makefile
Thanks for some help.
Dongsheng
On 2008-03-09, Dongsheng Song [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible[1] with Berkeley DB 4.6,
it is incompatible with DB 4.6.3 and up (where they quietly
broke the API). 4.6.2 and below are ok.
so I must stick to BDB 4.5 or upgrade to OpenLDAP 2.4 ?
You have several
On 1 January 2008, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vijay Sankar mrta:
[...]
there's support in 2.4 but iirc it's not a simple thing to
backport.
Why should we backport the db4.6 support? We just need to use 2.4.
[...]
(1) Historically, upgrading existing OpenLDAP databases to new formats
On December 31, 2007 06:59:06 am Vijay Sankar wrote:
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb
so I am
surprised to not have had a crash or any problems at all when I
should have had seg faults! I am using all the samba-related schemas
PLUS slurpd and I am still not seeing segfaults with OpenLDAP
2.3.33p2 and DB 4.6. I am not new to OpenBSD (have used it since 2.8
and have the CD's
Vijay Sankar mrta:
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built
On 2008/01/01 13:27, Daniel wrote:
there's support in 2.4 but iirc it's not a simple thing to backport.
Why should we backport the db4.6 support? We just need to use 2.4.
Well, you mentioned one reason why not just upgrade:
With openldap-2.4, one can not use the ldbm backend anymore
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built
Quoting Vijay Sankar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using
)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
openldap-{client,server}, dbv4 and cyrus-sasl2 packages from
there.
I will certanly provide much more info, I just want to know if
there are other
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
openldap-{client,server}, dbv4 and cyrus-sasl2 packages from
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using the bdb
backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
openldap-{client,server}, dbv4 and cyrus-sasl2 packages from there.
I will certanly provide much more info, I just want to know
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using the bdb
backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
openldap-{client,server}, dbv4 and cyrus-sasl2 packages from there.
I
On December 29, 2007 02:15:15 pm Daniel wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:41:06 -0600
Vijay Sankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:41:06 -0600
Vijay Sankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built
Thanks a lot,
it gives the opportunity to read something new.
Now I know better about it.
I think it's a good idea to share our current reading.
On Dec 13, 2007 12:25 AM, badeguruji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.acay.com.au/~oscarp/tutor/
for all new Openldap users.
thx, and sorry
I've been asked to deploy an openldap server so that we can test our
software's authentication layer against it. I've never messed with LDAP
before now, so I look forward to going through this tutorial. I read the
first few slides last night and it looked pretty good.
Thanks!
Tom
On Dec 12
http://www.acay.com.au/~oscarp/tutor/
for all new Openldap users.
thx, and sorry if you don't need this.
-BG
~~Kalyan-mastu~~
Hello,
I have a strange problem:
--8
# pkg_add -i cyrus-sasl-2.1.21p3-ldap
Error from
http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/OpenBSD/4.1/packages/i386/:
ftp: Writing -: Broken pipe
Can't install cyrus-sasl-2.1.21p3-ldap: can't resolve
openldap-client-2.3.33
Can't install openldap
On Saturday 26 May 2007 14:14, Vijay Sankar wrote:
I have been using the openldap (openldap-server-2.3.33p1-bdb) from
ports and it works great when I use slurpd for replication.
I would like to use syncrepl instead of slurpd, just to see what the
benefits are. However I don't know how
I have been using the openldap (openldap-server-2.3.33p1-bdb) from ports
and it works great when I use slurpd for replication.
I would like to use syncrepl instead of slurpd, just to see what the
benefits are. However I don't know how to enable the dynamic backend
modules since
Hi,
I'm having problems getting log messages from syslogd for local4 messages.
In syslog.conf, I added:
local4.*/var/log/ldap.log
I issued a restart for syslogd:
kill -HUP `cat /var/run/syslog.pid`
I compiled OpenLDAP:
--with-syslog --with-debug
I start OpenLDAP
`
I compiled OpenLDAP:
--with-syslog --with-debug
I start OpenLDAP with:
/usr/local/libexec/slapd -u _openldap -g _openldap -f
/etc/openldap/slapd.conf
I get no logs though. Anyone know what I'm missing here???
Did you do a touch /var/log/ldap.log?
I have, as well, tried:
logger
messages from syslogd for local4
messages.
In syslog.conf, I added:
local4.*/var/log/ldap.log
I issued a restart for syslogd:
kill -HUP `cat /var/run/syslog.pid`
I compiled OpenLDAP:
--with-syslog --with-debug
I start OpenLDAP with:
/usr/local/libexec/slapd -u
with the /usr/local/libexec/slapd -u
_openldap -g _openldap -f /etc/openldap/slapd.conf ? Can you verify
with a ps auwx | grep slapd that it is running and listening on port
389?
On my test system, I got the following when I tried your startup command
unable to open pid file /var/run/slapd.pid 13
On Thu, 24 May 2007, neustream wrote:
Yes..I forgot to mention I did a:
touch /var/log/ldap.log
Yes but that the _openldap user have write access to the log file?
--
Antoine
Thanks all for your help!
Well yes slapd runs when I issue:
/usr/local/libexec/slapd -u _openldap -g _openldap -f
/etc/openldap/slapd.conf
With ps ax | grep slapd, I get:
3347 ?? Is 0:00.03 /usr/local/libexec/slapd -u _openldap -g
_openldap -f /etc/openldap/slapd.conf
With netstat
Ok..well I am thinking, if I have:
local4.*/var/log/ldap.log
in syslog.conf and I issue:
kill -HUP `cat /var/run/syslog.pid`
Then this command should work:
logger -p local4.info Hello World
and log to /var/run/ldap.log.
When I issue:
logger -p mail.info Hello World
I get Hello
On 5/24/07, neustream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm having problems getting log messages from syslogd for local4 messages.
In syslog.conf, I added:
local4.*/var/log/ldap.log
I issued a restart for syslogd:
kill -HUP `cat /var/run/syslog.pid`
I compiled OpenLDAP
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Darren Spruell wrote:
You've got tabs, or spaces between your local4.* and path?
DS
Yea
someone else with the the same comment as mine
for the original poster see this thread related to syslog configuration
for slapd
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap
.* and path?
DS
Yea
someone else with the the same comment as mine
for the original poster see this thread related to syslog configuration
for slapd
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200111/msg00307.html
appears to be a similar question asked in Nov 2001
diana
On Thu, 24 May 2007, neustream wrote:
Thanks all for your help.
I was using vim with tabs converted to spaces in my vimrc. I edited
/etc/syslog.conf with vi and used tabs between local4.* and path.
Works now!
Great!
I'd call that pretty good support, ~ 3.5 hours from your original post
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 07:29:45AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Uv Pzaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-20 23:12]:
I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are
stating that this is no good any more
* Bryan Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-21 09:01]:
Older versions of bdb went bad a fairly regular basis. I had DB's go
corrupt as often as once a day under older verson of OL using bdb.
This hasn't been a problem for a while though. I havn't had a db go
bad in 2 years, even after power
* Dave Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-21 08:26]:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Uv Pzaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-20 23:12]:
I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are
stating
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Dave Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-21 08:26]:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Uv Pzaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-20 23:12]:
I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks
I still want to push this little points directly from the OpenLDAP faq:
* back-ldbm is /obsolete/ and /should not be used/.
*As a historical note, the back-ldbm code is a direct descendant of the
original University of Michigan code. The age of the code and its
byzantine data structures were
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Uv Pzaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-20 23:12]:
I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are
stating that this is no good any more:
(http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/756
On 5/20/07, Dave Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Uv Pzaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-20 23:12]:
I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are
stating that this is no good
I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are
stating that this is no good any more:
(http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/756.htm) and not bdb or hdb.
By the way I'm just wondering i don't think i have
* Uv Pzaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-20 23:12]:
I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are
stating that this is no good any more:
(http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/756.htm) and not bdb or hdb
Hi,
I am running OpenBSD 4.0 stable. I updated the ports tree and tried
cd /usr/ports/databases/openldap
env FLAVOUR=bdb make install
Although I think the script is building both client and server, it
only adds the client package.
autoconf-2.13p0 automatically configure source code on many
On 3/6/07, Jose Fragoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am running OpenBSD 4.0 stable. I updated the ports tree and tried
cd /usr/ports/databases/openldap
env FLAVOUR=bdb make install
That's not a bug that's a feature!
env FLAVOR=bdb env SUBPACKAGE=-server make install
--Bryan
On 3/6/07, Jose Fragoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am running OpenBSD 4.0 stable. I updated the ports tree and tried
cd /usr/ports/databases/openldap
env FLAVOUR=bdb make install
Although I think the script is building both client and server, it
only adds the client package.
autoconf
Hi all,
im trying to install openldap-server-2.3.11p4.tgz (i386) and
openldap-client-2.3.11p4.tgz (i386) under OpenBSD3.9. After
i've configured my slapd.conf im trying to start the server (slapd -d4 )
but the i get the following error:
# /usr/local/libexec/slapd -d 4
@(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd
On Monday 12 February 2007 09:27, Antonis Faragitakis wrote:
Hi all,
im trying to install openldap-server-2.3.11p4.tgz (i386) and
openldap-client-2.3.11p4.tgz (i386) under OpenBSD3.9. After
i've configured my slapd.conf im trying to start the server (slapd -d4 )
but the i get the following
Hi,
On Fri, 08.12.2006 at 10:02:37 -0800, Bryan Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been running 2.2.27 (with db4 FWIW) since august-ish of last year
with zero corruption problems.
please also be sure to enable the sync option on bdb databases. I've
only experienced data loss when slapd went
Dr. Harry Knitter wrote:
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2006 20:23 schrieb Bryan Irvine:
I have installed the following binaries:
openldap-server-2.3.24
openldap-client-2.3.24
db-4.2.52p8
OS is OpenBSD 4.0
You need to install openldap-server-2.3.24-bdb
If installed from ports use env FLAVOR=bdb make
, but there was a version of
openldap where that happened a lot. I was having to restore from
backups about once a week. IIRC it was 2.2.24 (and earlier?).
I've been running 2.2.27 (with db4 FWIW) since august-ish of last year
with zero corruption problems.
YMMV though. I only have a few tens-of-thousands of lookups
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2006 20:23 schrieb Bryan Irvine:
I have installed the following binaries:
openldap-server-2.3.24
openldap-client-2.3.24
db-4.2.52p8
OS is OpenBSD 4.0
You need to install openldap-server-2.3.24-bdb
If installed from ports use env FLAVOR=bdb make install to get
You need to install openldap-server-2.3.24-bdb
If installed from ports use env FLAVOR=bdb make install to get it, or if
you used packages then use the bdb version.
--Bryan
I installed the package. However, on the mirror I used I don4t find any
bdb
version.
So it is. I thought I
101 - 200 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
