Does anyone have any experience in using IPC shared memory or similar in
caching data amongst multiple httpd daemons ? We run a large-ish database
dependent site, with a mysql daemon serving many hundreds of requests a
minute. While we are currently caching SQL query results on a per-process
Been running with it for almost three years now. What's the question?
David M. Davisson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: J. Horner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 7:02 AM
Subject: mod_perl with Stronghold
I searched the
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, J. Horner wrote:
I searched the archives, but no mention of this. Does anyone have any
experience with mod_perl and Stronghold?
We run StrongHold with mod_perl/1.21 (and other stuff), without any
problems. Read INSTALL.simple.stronghold to give you a start on how
to build
Hi,
I embarking on writing a mod_perl handler that accepts XML posted from
client apps/browsers and then does "stuff" with the received XML snippets.
I would like to take advantage of some of the projects discussed at
xml.apache.org (The Apache XML Project), but I'm not sure how they fit
i actually started writing a perl port of cocoon, but i only
got a couple classes done before it became obvious that we
weren't actually going to use it at work.
however, cocoon itself is pretty simple. and the project
leaders are definitely interested in having a perl port. one
of my biggest
Hi there,
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Paul J. Lucas wrote:
I have code that contains the line:
$r-lookup_uri( $r-param( 'pm_uri' ) )-filename;
[snip]
However, if I have an access restriction that forbids access to
files ending in a .pm extension and the URI maps to
Hi,
We've been running a modperl environment 'on' a NetApp since dec 1997
and would't even dare to think about going back;). We've found no
gotcha's. Iff you can afford it I can really recommend it. The way we
use it is that we store all configs, libraries and sites on the netapp.
As a front-end
The server seems to be putting the 'included'embperl files into the
same namespace.
As long as you don't force EMbperl to do otherwise, every Embperl will run
in it's own namespace
Each page works fine if you hup the server, going
from one section of the site to annother results in the top nav
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to news.groups as well.
"jiminy" == jiminy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jiminy Mod_perl is becoming a widely used method for developing
jiminy dynamic web pages, superceding in many ways CGI. While
jiminy discussion of
Peter Skipworth wrote:
Does anyone have any experience in using IPC shared memory or similar in
caching data amongst multiple httpd daemons ? We run a large-ish database
dependent site, with a mysql daemon serving many hundreds of requests a
minute. While we are currently caching SQL query
Hi,
My environment is apache.1.3.9, mod_perl-1.21, perl5.005_63.
When I do make to compile mod_perl-1.21, from src directory, I have the
undefine of identifier PL_siggv in the mod_perl.c modul.
Is anyone working with the development version of perl5, the perl5.005_63 ?
Doesn't any anyone know
Hi,
My environment is apache.1.3.9, mod_perl-1.21, perl5.005_63.
When I do make to compile mod_perl-1.21, from src directory, I have the
undefine of identifier PL_siggv in the mod_perl.c modul.
Is anyone working with the development version of perl5, the perl5.005_63 ?
Doesn't any
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 01:01:43PM +0100, R. F. Lens wrote:
Hi,
We've been running a modperl environment 'on' a NetApp since dec 1997
and would't even dare to think about going back;). We've found no
gotcha's. Iff you can afford it I can really recommend it. The way we
use it is that we
"JH" == J Horner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JH I searched the archives, but no mention of this. Does anyone have any
JH experience with mod_perl and Stronghold?
It works just fine like any other apache module. mod_perl has
stronghold awareness for the configuration process. just be sure you
At 05:32 PM 02/02/00 -0700, Marc Slemko wrote:
I thought about not putting the mod_perl specific one in there at all (ie.
just the CGI.pm one,
BTW about the CGI.pm example:
use CGI ();
$Text = "foobbar";
$URL = "foobbar.html";
print CGI::escapeHTML($Text), "BR";
Sorry for being off topic, but
Hi,
I've just got my apache/modperl setup to work. This little nastie
took me 2 days to find.
In my /usr/src directory, I had:
- apache_1.3.3 [dir]
- apache_1.3.9 [dir]
- mod_perl-1.21 [dir]
and was compiling modperl/perl with:
#perl Makefile.PL
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Peter Skipworth wrote:
Does anyone have any experience in using IPC shared memory or similar in
caching data amongst multiple httpd daemons ?
Well, I just released IPC::Cache version 0.02 to CPAN. Two major caveats,
however -- first, it is not currently in production on
Hi,
is I can step in here... ;-)
At 15:11 2/3/00 +, Tim Bunce wrote:
As a front-end we have 'cheap' PC's running Linux. The disks in the PC's
are only used for the OS and temporary storage of logs, etc.
What level of web traffic are you handling 'from' the netapp?
E.g., how much traffic
--- Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
The mod-perl mailing list (at [EMAIL PROTECTED]) does not yet
have excessive traffic. Perhaps it is a bit hard to find
--- end of quote ---
You're too kind. It's right there on the homepage. Maybe it deserves a link in the
unordered list near the top, though.
I
Hi there,
I've got the canned footer (Eagle book chapter 4)
up and running, and it edits html files on the local host fine using the
Files ~ "\.html$"... directive.
I was wondering how to implement the footer so that
it appeared on all html files (ie. external files), and not just local
"OHI1" == Oliver Holmes ITS 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OHI1 Hi there,
OHI1 I've got the canned footer (Eagle book chapter 4) up and running, and it edits
html files on the local host fine using the Files ~ "\.html$"... directive.
OHI1 I was wondering how to implement the footer so that it
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Paul J. Lucas wrote:
I have code that contains the line:
$r-lookup_uri( $r-param( 'pm_uri' ) )-filename;
[snip]
However, if I have an access restriction that forbids access to
files ending in a .pm
At 03:33 PM 2/3/00 +1100, Peter Skipworth wrote:
Does anyone have any experience in using IPC shared memory or similar in
caching data amongst multiple httpd daemons ? We run a large-ish database
dependent site, with a mysql daemon serving many hundreds of requests a
minute. While we are
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz)
Date: 03 Feb 2000 06:19:54 -0800
Subject: Re: RFD: comp.infosystems.www.modperl
If this is your only motivation to create a news group, I would vote
no. When the mailing list traffic gets excessive, it's time to start
a newsgroup. That has not
Hi there,
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Paul J. Lucas wrote:
Are you checking the status of the subrequest?
No. Intentionally. As I wrote, I don't care what Apache says about
the accessibility of the file. I *will* read it. All I want to do
is suppress the "client denied by server request"
"TM" == Tom Mornini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TM 2) Better scalability. I've head (but never benchmarked) that SSL in
TMgeneral is 100 times more processor intensive than non-ssl connections.
TMI want my mod_perl server running mod_perl, not mod_ssl! In a
TMhigh-volume site you're
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
[snipped]
Stas, are you sure DESTROY executed when children died ?
I'm using ApacheDBI and have problem with DESTROY when I use
finish or disconnect methods.
Of course! This works for me:
die.pl
use MyRun;
print
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
"TM" == Tom Mornini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TM 2) Better scalability. I've head (but never benchmarked) that SSL in
TMgeneral is 100 times more processor intensive than non-ssl connections.
TMI want my mod_perl server running mod_perl, not
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Martin A. Langhoff wrote:
Hi,
I've just got my apache/modperl setup to work. This little nastie
took me 2 days to find.
In my /usr/src directory, I had:
- apache_1.3.3 [dir]
- apache_1.3.9 [dir]
- mod_perl-1.21 [dir]
and was
"TM" == Tom Mornini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you have a high volume site that uses SSL, you should really be
offloading the SSL processing to dedicated cryptography hardware.
TM A fairly new option, I believe, and an excellent point.
Not really. I saw these boards available at least 2
I'm sorry if this has been asked, but I haven't seen the answer.
After you wonderful people pointed me in the right direction for making
mod_perl with Stronghold, I'm now the proud parent of a mod_perl enabled
stronghold server. How to I let my new baby stretch her wings? What good
benchmarks
On 2/3/00 1:17 PM, Bill Jones wrote:
however, that doesn't mean that the 'experts' will frequent the
newsgroup more than a mailing list - people tend to start flame
wars more in a usenet setting...
OTOH, it's a lot easier to track and respond to particular
issues/problems in a threaded
On Sat Jan 29 13:11:25 2000 + Mike Whitaker wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Doug MacEachern) wrote:
there are hints in the SUPPORT doc on how to debug such problems. there
was also several "Hanging process" threads in the past weeks with more
tips, search in the archives for keywords gdb,
"John" == John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John OTOH, it's a lot easier to track and respond to particular
John issues/problems in a threaded setting like Usenet.
Hmm. Get a threaded mailreader. It certainly changed my mail
reading. :)
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting
"J. Horner" wrote:
I'm sorry if this has been asked, but I haven't seen the answer.
After you wonderful people pointed me in the right direction for making
mod_perl with Stronghold, I'm now the proud parent of a mod_perl enabled
stronghold server. How to I let my new baby stretch her
On 3. februar 2000 19:49 Tom Mornini wrote:
2) Better scalability. I've head (but never benchmarked) that SSL in
general is 100 times more processor intensive than non-ssl
connections.
That would have to be if you didn't cache session keys and had to
set up a new symmetric key for every
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Kent Perrier wrote:
"Randal L. Schwartz" wrote:
"John" == John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John OTOH, it's a lot easier to track and respond to particular
John issues/problems in a threaded setting like Usenet.
Hmm. Get a threaded mailreader. It
Yet, strangely, *this* thread seems to have threaded nicely (at least
in 'mutt').
Tim.
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 02:54:41PM -0600, Kent Perrier wrote:
"Randal L. Schwartz" wrote:
"John" == John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John OTOH, it's a lot easier to track and respond to
Hello,
Is there any performance advantage (speed, memory consumption) to creating a
single, large, mod_perl program that can handle various types of
"requests" for database data (fetchUserData fetchPaymentData,
fetchSubscriptionData) as opposed to many small mod_perl scripts each
related
Embperl (1.2.0) causes a core dump when I put in a loop control statement. For
instance, in the following snippet of code, when the 'last' line is reached,
the apache child dumps core.
[- $i = 0 -]
[$ while ($i 10) $]
[+ $i +]br
[$ if ($i == 5) $]
[- last -]
[$ endif $]
[-
Greetings,
Is there a way to get mod_perl to tell how much memory is being used
by each module and compiled scripts?
-Bill
begin:vcard
n:Deegan;William
tel;fax:650-413-1355
tel;work:650-598-3858
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.iescrow.com
org:iEscrow,Inc.
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (G.W. Haywood) wrote:
Hi there,
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Paul J. Lucas wrote:
Are you checking the status of the subrequest?
No. Intentionally. As I wrote, I don't care what Apache says about
the accessibility of the file. I *will* read it. All I want to do
is suppress the
Is there any performance advantage (speed, memory consumption) to
creating a single, large, mod_perl program that can handle various types
of "requests" for database data (fetchUserData fetchPaymentData,
fetchSubscriptionData) as opposed to many small mod_perl scripts
each related to a
Is there a way to get mod_perl to tell how much memory is being used
by each module and compiled scripts?
Yes, Doug presented a few techniques at the last Perl Conference. I will
put parts of it into a guide at some time in the future ...
it's in "Part III - Debugging and Optimizing mod_perl
I'm running a mod_perl proxy module similar to the one in the book. I'm
curious
why you say
Keep-Alive is a problem? Is your concern performance because of timeout
settings, or something else?
I'm not exactly sure what the problem is, but when Keep-Alive is passed via LWP
images are very
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Joshua Chamas wrote:
I regrouped the HelloWorld benchmark data at http://www.chamas.com/bench/
recently, so that it gives you a more informative comparison of the relative
startup costs of web environments on a per platform basis.
Registry scripts run slower according to
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
"TM" == Tom Mornini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you have a high volume site that uses SSL, you should really be
offloading the SSL processing to dedicated cryptography hardware.
TM A fairly new option, I believe, and an excellent point.
Not
Hi all,
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Tim Peoples wrote:
Yet, strangely, *this* thread seems to have threaded nicely (at
least in 'mutt').
Well, sort of.
I use pine and the inbox default sort is as received. Which means
that I seem to see most of the answers before I see the questions.
Jie Gao wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Joshua Chamas wrote:
I regrouped the HelloWorld benchmark data at http://www.chamas.com/bench/
recently, so that it gives you a more informative comparison of the relative
startup costs of web environments on a per platform basis.
Registry scripts
Jie Gao wrote:
Registry scripts run slower according to the benchmark data here. Presuming
both were preloaded at server startup, can anybody explain this slowness?
Slow is relative ... still a lot faster than vanilla cgi. But registry needs to
emulate a cgi-like environment before
Embperl (1.2.0) causes a core dump when I put in a loop control
statement. For
instance, in the following snippet of code, when the 'last' line
is reached,
the apache child dumps core.
[- $i = 0 -]
[$ while ($i 10) $]
[+ $i +]br
[$ if ($i == 5) $]
[- last -]
[$ endif
Does Apache::ASP provide access to COM objects on UNIX if a cross-platform
toolkit such as MainWin is used? In an FAQ, a similar question is asked
about ActiveX objects. The answer is, "Only under Win32 will developers
have access to ActiveX objects through the perl Win32::OLE interface. This
Jason Bodnar wrote:
On 19-Jan-00 Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Jason Bodnar wrote:
A line in the proxy example of the eagle book on page 380 does not seem to
work
(entirely):
The line:
$r-headers_in-do(sub {$request-header(@_);});
what if you change that
I embarking on writing a mod_perl handler that accepts XML posted from
client apps/browsers and then does "stuff" with the received XML snippets.
I would like to take advantage of some of the projects discussed at
xml.apache.org (The Apache XML Project), but I'm not sure how they fit into
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Bill Jones wrote:
[...]
I have to whole heartily agree. I couldn't, at first glance, find
the mod_perl mailing list; but once I did, the posters here proved
very helpful. I believe that once more people see the mailing ...
if you fail to read the file called SUPPORT when
John DiFini wrote:
Does Apache::ASP provide access to COM objects on UNIX if a cross-platform
toolkit such as MainWin is used? In an FAQ, a similar question is asked
about ActiveX objects. The answer is, "Only under Win32 will developers
have access to ActiveX objects through the perl
56 matches
Mail list logo
