Re: AuthCookieDBI help please.... (more info)

2002-10-11 Thread Vegard Vesterheim
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:44:51 -0700 George Valpak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 04:16 PM 10/10/2002 -0700, I wrote: I am having trouble with Apache:AuthCookieDBI. I hope someone here can help because I have not been able to find a solution despite extensive searching. snip OK, now I am

Re: AuthCookieDBI help please.... (more info)

2002-10-11 Thread George Valpak
Thanks - I tried that earlier and again at your suggestion - no change in the behavior is noted. This is really frustrating - there doesn't seem to be anything special about this config that should cause me such trouble. I suppose tomorrow I could try the kludge that is recommended in that

RE: Testing mod_perl app on Windows

2002-10-11 Thread Adam Nelson
ME is just windows 98 with some bells and whistles. If you want server, then win2k Server is still the standard (XP is only for workstation/desktop). I think mod_perl/Apache will run fine on ME,2000,XP,and even 98. But for real server environment, the choice is 2000 Server. -Original

mod_perl config

2002-10-11 Thread Pierre Vaudrey
I'm just switching from Mac OSX 10.1.5 to 10.2 where Library/WebServer/Documents is changed to Bibliothèque /WebServer/Documents . The httpd.conf is still proposed with Library . Could you tell me if I need to change Library to Bibliothèque in httpd.conf ? Pierre Vaudrey email [EMAIL

Testing mod_perl app on Windows

2002-10-11 Thread Ken Y. Clark
My boss has asked me to pick up a Windows box so that I can test my application using the standard browsers on that OS. OK, I can see how it is a Good Thing to make sure that those people unfortunate enough to use Windows are able to use my application without errors. But I also had another

Re: Testing mod_perl app on Windows

2002-10-11 Thread pascal barbedor
Hi 2000 or XP are more robust, shell a little better you can install apache/modperl on any 2000, XP on XP you have name completion like in unix in the shell windows, a little + I have a running server on 2000 with apache 1 /modperl 1 plus a reverse proxy plain apache server to speed up a

Re: [OT] migrating from Apache to iPlanet; any mod_perl counterpart?

2002-10-11 Thread Paul
FastCGI and PersistentPerl are both working equivalents to mod_perl with similar capabilities and performance. They should work just fine with iPlanet. Oh yeah Awesome. I will look into that. I don't see why that would be any different from what you currently have. Any state

Re: [OT] migrating from Apache to iPlanet; any mod_perl counterpart?

2002-10-11 Thread Perrin Harkins
Paul wrote: What I mean is that before I had a custom access handler installed to use MySQL without resorting to state management other than the http NCSA Basic Authentication header You should be able to do that with FastCGI. Not sure about PersistentPerl. You'd have to ask the author. -

[ANNOUNCE] Apache::SessionManager 0.03

2002-10-11 Thread Enrico Sorcinelli
The uploaded file Apache-SessionManager-0.03.tar.gz has entered CPAN as file: $CPAN/authors/id/E/EN/ENRYS/Apache-SessionManager-0.03.tar.gz size: 11080 bytes md5: f55d94602beec986b02ddd36234894e9 Changes from previous version - + Added

Re: [OT] migrating from Apache to iPlanet; any mod_perl counterpart?

2002-10-11 Thread Paul
--- Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul wrote: What I mean is that before I had a custom access handler installed to use MySQL without resorting to state management other than the http NCSA Basic Authentication header You should be able to do that with FastCGI. Not sure about

Re: [OT] migrating from Apache to iPlanet; any mod_perl counterpart?

2002-10-11 Thread Perrin Harkins
Paul wrote: Looks like the FastCGI binaries are only available for Windows versions. We'll be on Sun Solaris, but I can probably recompile the source, if that doesn't cause the open-source police to come get me. I'm afraid it's not as obvious how to do it as it is with mod_perl. You may

Re: [OT] migrating from Apache to iPlanet; any mod_perl counterpart?

2002-10-11 Thread Paul
--- Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul wrote: Looks like the FastCGI binaries are only available for Windows versions. We'll be on Sun Solaris, but I can probably recompile the source, if that doesn't cause the open-source police to come get me. I'm afraid it's not as

unsubscribe RTFM's not working, lol....

2002-10-11 Thread Paul
Okay, at least twice now I've sent this person explicit (and even polite) instructions on how to unsubscribe, once even including an explicit link for each of these two email addresses. Both times I included instructions on how to get more instructions, both via email, and with reference links.

Re: unsubscribe RTFM's not working, lol....

2002-10-11 Thread George Valpak
yeah I was getting them too - i forwarded to abuse and thanks for reminding me I was going to call the number on the whois recordthis is obviously coming from a autoresponder. If I don't get a good response from my phone call, I will let this list know and then do what you will GV At

Re: unsubscribe RTFM's not working, lol....

2002-10-11 Thread George Valpak
At 11:21 AM 10/11/2002 -0700, you wrote: yeah I was getting them too - i forwarded to abuse and thanks for reminding me I was going to call the number on the whois recordthis is obviously coming from a autoresponder. If I don't get a good response from my phone call, I will let this list

OT: Are things really this bad?

2002-10-11 Thread Todd Finney
I was looking at jobs.perl.org this afternoon, and there are a lot of things on there like this: - we'll pay you when we have some money - $20-$30 an hour - Do all this, we'll give you $75. I'm not *really* in the market, but more work is always better. Are the jobs

Re: OT: Are things really this bad?

2002-10-11 Thread Ken Y. Clark
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Todd Finney wrote: Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:42:08 -0400 From: Todd Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Are things really this bad? I was looking at jobs.perl.org this afternoon, and there are a lot of things on there like this: -

Re: OT: Are things really this bad?

2002-10-11 Thread Paul
--- Todd Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was looking at jobs.perl.org this afternoon, and there are a lot of things on there like this: - we'll pay you when we have some money - $20-$30 an hour - Do all this, we'll give you $75. I'm not *really* in the market, but more

Re: OT: Are things really this bad?

2002-10-11 Thread Steven Adams
On Friday 11 October 2002 12:42 pm, Todd Finney wrote: Are the jobs on there really representative of what's going on out there, or are they somehow skewed? Just curious. cheers, Todd Take it from me, Todd, it is that bad. I'm fortunate in that I was able to make the move from