you verify that this code variant works under Win32, too?
Yes.
-trung
__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl) www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A
Leay again, yes - but from the
cache. Because as we discussed some time ago, caching the pass phrase is more
a security problem than directly caching the private key (because SSLeay
caches the private key itself, too).
So we should not have any pass phrase handling problems here.
> > Ca
On Mon, 09 Nov 1998 11:18:19 GMT,
Ralf S. Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 1998, Trung Tran-Duc wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 09 Nov 1998 10:03:23 GMT,
> > Ralf S. Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > [...]
> > > This way we init SSLeay on every init under DSO/DLL
On Mon, Nov 09, 1998, Trung Tran-Duc wrote:
> > > On Mon, 09 Nov 1998 10:03:23 GMT,
> > > Ralf S. Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > [...]
> > > > This way we init SSLeay on every init under DSO/DLL situation but not under
> > > > Unix/non-DSO. And the pass phrase handling is
Hi,
Is it possible that someone give me URL, or file attachment with a
complete package of :
Apache 1.3.3 + mod-ssl 2.1.0
and other things needed for running on Windows NT4 environement.
(I really need a complete package ... !)
I'm sorry I haven't any tools for compiling the differents packages
re now fixed for 2.3.1. Sorry for the inconviniences
under Win32, but I'm neither officially support this platform nor do I
currently have access to a useable Win32 development environment. So I had to
blind prepare the Win32 support for 2.3.0 ;)
Ra
Thank you. Its a great effort on your side and I fully appreciate all of
it.
Cheers
lin geng
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTEC
Then do the following: Generate a password with the value
of "password" and use this encoded passwd instead of
"xxj31ZMTZzkVA" in htpasswd file.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>
> Full_Name: John le Noble
> Version: mod_ssl-2.3.5-1.3.6
> OS: WIN32
> Submis
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: John le Noble
> Version: mod_ssl-2.3.5-1.3.6
> OS: WIN32
> Submission from: tc-22.rotterdam.luna.net (193.172.189.150)
>
> Due to MD5 encryption of the htpasswd files (default for WIN32 in 1.3.6), Basic
> Authent
"Daniel Reichenbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i tested mod_ssl 2.4.3, 2.4.4 and 2.4.5 Snapshot on Win32. Its totally
> broken. 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 cause a page fault in OpenSSL, each time a
> connection is established.
>
> mod_ssl 2.4.5 doesn`t even compile. I
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999, Daniel Reichenbach wrote:
> i tested mod_ssl 2.4.3, 2.4.4 and 2.4.5 Snapshot on Win32. Its totally
> broken. 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 cause a page fault in OpenSSL, each time a
> connection is established.
Why is mod_ssl broken if you get a page fault inside OpenSSL?
; Studio\VC98\bin\NMAKE
> > .EXE"' : return code '0x2'
> > Stop.
> >
> > AP_MM under Win32 ?
> I get the result that you're describing with 2.4.5 when
> I compile 2.4.4.
>
> Upon debugging, I determined that the patch program
> (etc\p
>
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Stop.
> > > NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Programme\Microsoft Visual
> > > Studio\VC98\bin\NMAKE
> > > .EXE"' : return code '0x2'
> > > Stop.
> > >
> > > AP_MM under Win32 ?
> > I get the result that you&
Hy,
i did a quick test with Apache 1.3.12, mod_ssl 2.6.0 and both OpenSSL
0.9.4 and 0.9.5beta1 under Win98 and WinNT/SP5.
Got the following error message using NMAKE Version 6.00.8168.0:
cl.exe /nologo /c /O2 /MD /W3 /GX /DNDEBUG /DWIN32 /D_WINDOWS
/DSHARED_MODULE /DEAPI /DMOD_SSL=206100 /DMOD_
vs log or so,
> where i can take a look at things changed since 2.4.10 ?
I just did a quick check with many diff`s and loads of coffee :-)
None of Ralf`s changes seem conflicting with Win32. The biggest change
is the "POST for HTTPS" support, which is now conservative instead of
experime
s with mod_ssl.
> > Last version running was mod_ssl 2.4.10. Is there any cvs log or so,
> > where i can take a look at things changed since 2.4.10 ?
> I just did a quick check with many diff`s and loads of coffee :-)
> None of Ralf`s changes seem conflicting with Win32. The bigges
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000, Daniel S. Reichenbach wrote:
> [...]
> Did anyone else take a look? I couldn´t find any errors with mod_ssl.
> Last version running was mod_ssl 2.4.10. Is there any cvs log or so,
> where i can take a look at things changed since 2.4.10 ?
You can retrieve a copy of the CVS
> > Last version running was mod_ssl 2.4.10. Is there any cvs log or so,
> > where i can take a look at things changed since 2.4.10 ?
>
> You can retrieve a copy of the CVS source repository via rsync as
> explain on http://www.modssl.org/source/repos.html and then checkout
> particular mod_ssl ve
From: "Daniel Montalibet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 1:34 PM
> I recently brought over the Win32 binaries packaged on Mar 14th, 2000:
> Apache_1.3.12-mod_ssl_2.6.1-openssl_0.9.5-WIN32-i386.zip
> Unfortunetaly, I can't the HTTPS server run
Hi all,
I've been through an installation before using Apache 1.3.6
and Modssl, so I thought 1.3.12 should go relatively smoothly.
Hah!
I installed the Win32 build of Apache 1.3.12 (from the Apache
site), and grabbed the modssl/openssl materials from the modssl
site. The particular fil
Reid M. Pinchback (19.4.2000 21:32):
>Apache worked before installing modssl. It works after installing
>modssl, until I try to load the module. I did the obvious thing:
>
> LoadModule ssl_module modules/ApacheModuleSSL.dll
>
>but when I try to start Apache from the Services control panel
>I
Further testing/debugging shows that my previous bug fix will also work for
paths containing spaces. The "trick" is to enclose the entire
SSLPassPhraseDialog parameter in double-quotes. Thus, the following
succeeds:
SSLPassPhraseDialog "exec:f:/program files/opensa/apache/bin/pwfilter1.exe"
W
On Thu, May 11, 2000, Kirk Benson wrote:
> There are a couple of problems with using the SSLPassPhraseDialog
> exec:[path] on Apache Win32. There is a simple source fix for on of them,
> and a workaround for the other.
> [...]
I've fixed this now with the suggested quotes
Does anyone know when a release of mod_ssl supporting Apache 2.0.42 for
Win32 will be available?
Thank you,
--
jeff h.
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List
Hello,
We are experiencing problems with our Win32 Apache 1.3.26 with mod_ssl
2.8.10 + openssl 0.9.6b running on Windows 2000.
It is a sort of DoS attacks that make our web site totally inaccessible.
One of those attacks was captured with Ethereal. The dump is attached.
As you can see, the
> Here are 3 issues that I noticed that caused the build to fail on
> the patching
> and building in win32, There might be more but I haven't looked
> hard enough ;)
Try the latest snapshots from ftp://ftp.modssl.org/snapshot/
These issues have be
gt;
> I'm sorry I haven't any tools for compiling the differents packages.
With complete you mean binary distributions, right? I'm intentionally not
create Win32 binary distributions for Apache+mod_ssl for the official Distrib/
area. But perhaps someone will build a Win32 binar
mplete package ... !)
>
> With complete you mean binary distributions, right? I'm intentionally not
> create Win32 binary distributions for Apache+mod_ssl for the official Distrib/
> area. But perhaps someone will build a Win32 binary package which we then can
> be place under uns
Does anybody have a binary for Win32 Apache 1.3.4 and mod_SSL? We don't have
a compiler for Win32 just yet, but we need to get our SSL up.
Can anyone help? Thanks.
--
Alex Kac
Web Information Solutions CEO
Dynamic Business Publishing - Everyware Alliance Member
http://www.WebI
Full_Name:
Version: 2.5.0
OS: win95
Submission from: (NULL) (63.192.147.2)
The embeded perl script in Configure.bat that re-directs patch
errors doesn't really work in win32.
In win32, the '2>&1' syntax in the following statement is actually
telling the patch program t
up and running ???
Both 2.5.1 and 2.6.0 compile and run fine with vc++ 5.0 (OpenSSL 0.9.4 and WinNT/SP6).
With vc++ 6.0 we had to insert following lines into mod_ssl.h (OS headers section).
After that it compiles fine.
#ifdef WIN32
#include
#endif
These additions work
"Reid M. Pinchback" wrote:
> [...]
> but when I try to start Apache from the Services control panel
> I just get:
>
>Could not start the Apache service on \\SERVER
>Error 1067: The process terminated unexpectedly.
> [...]
>
> Am I missing something here?
>
If running it as a service give
At 11:56 PM 4/21/00 -0400, Jan Dries wrote:
>If running it as a service gives problems, try running it as a console
>app. Then you can at least see the prints to stdout as well.
Good idea! I'll try that.
>Have all the mod_ssl parameters been set up correctly? I.e. do you have
>a valid certifica
Hello,
is there any reason, why there is no openssl directory anymore in this contribution ?
I could not find any contribution containing OpenSSL_0.9.6d with an openssl directory
containing the sub directories bin, include and lib.
Is this directory not needed anymore ?
Thanks in advance
Alfr
Hi Alfred
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 09:44:29 +0200
"Boehme, Alfred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> am I right, that the contribution
> Apache_1.3.26-Mod_SSL_2.8.10-OpenSSL_0.9.6d-Win32.zip
> was generated by you ?
No, it wasn't. I compiled a
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, hunter wrote:
> I am open to any suggestions. I sent Ralf a note but he has not
> replied. I should have sent a note to you ... :-)
I don't have any more access to modssl.org than you do, unfortunately...
:-/ If it were apache.org, that would be another matter. But there
Jeff Hagan wrote:
> Does anyone know when a release of mod_ssl supporting Apache 2.0.42 for
> Win32 will be available?
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> --
> jeff h.
>
> __
> Apa
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002, Sergey Strakhov wrote about "Problem in mod_ssl 2.8.10 + Apache
1.3.26/WIn32 ?":
> We are experiencing problems with our Win32 Apache 1.3.26 with mod_ssl
> 2.8.10 + openssl 0.9.6b running on Windows 2000.
> It is a sort of DoS attacks that make o
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002, Sergey Strakhov wrote about "Problem in mod_ssl 2.8.10 +
>Apache 1.3.26/WIn32 ?":
> > We are experiencing problems with our Win32 Apache 1.3.26 with mod_ssl
> > 2.8.10 + openssl 0.9.6b running on Windows 2000.
> > It is a sort of DoS atta
We are in deep trouble trying to set the configuration prescribed above up.
As soon as we activate SSL, Apache dies upon us after the message above.
Without SSL, no prob. Has anybody got this configuration running and is
maybe able to point us upon what may be wrong? Sorry the bother, but we are
i
Full_Name: Aryeh Katz
Version:
OS: win32
Submission from: (NULL) (209.140.121.226)
Fix for Makefile.win (configure.bat) requested:
Instead of using cygwin (I found the download process too long), I used
the gnu utilities for win32 package from
http://www.wzw.tu-muenchen.de/~syring/win32
Title: Message
I know it's not
supported but... seems like something is still not good in mod_ssl , as reported
by Josef Goebel,
who posted a patch,
there is something odd in mod_ssl for win32. I applied his patch to ap_ctx.c ,
that cures
the crash in most of
the cases
in ap_ct
Hello everyone
I encounter a problem with the passphrase in mod_ssl on WinXP.
If I use the builtin passphrase dialog:
SSLPassPhraseDialog buildin
When I start apache2 from a cmd box:
Apache -DSSL start
I'm prompted for the passphrase when the first process start.
When the second process start
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name:
> Version: 2.5.0
> OS: win95
> Submission from: (NULL) (63.192.147.2)
>
> The embeded perl script in Configure.bat that re-directs patch
> errors doesn't really work in win32.
>
> In win32, th
Eli Marmor wrote:
Johann Bertscheit wrote:
> I analyzed the difference in speed - and I found the reason:
> for debugging purposes I set the SSLLogLevel to "debug" on WIN32
but not on cygwin.
> When I set the SSLLogLevel back to "info" then the speed differen
If you look further in contribution directory, you'll find OpenSSL
0.9.6d separately... use this one and same instructions as always and
it will (probably) work...
BA> Hello,
BA> is there any reason, why there is no openssl directory anymore in this
contribution ?
BA> I could not find any con
25. Juni 2002 13:14
> An: Boehme, Alfred
> Betreff: Re: Apache_1.3.26-Mod_SSL_2.8.10-OpenSSL_0.9.6d-Win32.zip: no
> openssl directory ?
>
>
> If you look further in contribution directory, you'll find OpenSSL
> 0.9.6d separately... use this one and same instructions as a
Cliff Wooley:
> But there's a reason we can't distribute crypto
> binaries from apache.org -- if we could, we
> would. Guess we wait for Ralf to check up on
> the contrib area.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that ITAR restrictions eased up about
a year ago, so OpenSSL strong crypto c
Look here for a current apache windows.
http://www.switzerland.net/Pneatec/
André
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 27.09.2002 15:10:55 >>>
Jeff Hagan wrote:
> Does anyone know when a release of mod_ssl supporting Apache 2.0.42
for
> Win32 will be available?
>
>
Hi All,
I want to build a apache web server supporting mod_ssl under win32 platform. And I
wonder if I could get it as building under linux. Please give me some advice.
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
Buoyant
Hi folks
The WIN32 modssl has a serious problem with SGC Certificates in such that
Browsers who try to "Step Up" can't successfully handshake.
For example Netscape 4.7 bails out with "A network error occurred while Netscape
was receiving data.". IE 4.0 has a similar
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 12:42:55PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We are in deep trouble trying to set the configuration prescribed above up.
> As soon as we activate SSL, Apache dies upon us after the message above.
> Without SSL, no prob. Has anybody got this configuration running and is
> ma
You should probably turn your apache errorlogs to info, and the
ssl_engine_logs to info as well. Start apache, and take a look. It should
tell you. Sounds like you probably have a perms issue with the certs. That
will cause your symptoms.
--
Austin
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, David Rees wrote:
> On T
ere in the standard Apache/1.3.14 modssl/2.7.2 Win32 distribution.
Regards,
Jan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> We are in deep trouble trying to set the configuration prescribed above up.
> As soon as we activate SSL, Apache dies upon us after the message above.
> Without SSL, no prob
appears to do so) if you
> don't type it twice. It's a bug that has been discussed in this more
> than once, and although patches have been suggested, the bug is still
> there in the standard Apache/1.3.14 modssl/2.7.2 Win32 distribution.
I'm not sure who put that build und
once, and although patches have been suggested, the bug is still
> > there in the standard Apache/1.3.14 modssl/2.7.2 Win32 distribution.
>
> I'm not sure who put that build under the Contrib section and not sure if
> that's really the right build from CVS (since modssl 2.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 12:20:44AM +0100, Jan Dries wrote:
>
> Oops, I just typed the version number from the original mail. Anyway,
> when I built the new 2.7.1 (tarball from
> www.modssl.org/source/mod_ssl-2.7.1-1.3.14.tar.gz) on a clean Apache
> 1.3.14 (tarball from the Apache
> httpd.apache.o
Whoa, just realized that I posted to a message that just got to my mailbox
10 days late. Was there some issue which prevented some mails to the list
from being distributed in a reasonable time frame?
-Dave
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 12:33:14AM -0800, David Rees wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 1
David Rees wrote:
>
> Whoa, just realized that I posted to a message that just got to my mailbox
> 10 days late. Was there some issue which prevented some mails to the list
> from being distributed in a reasonable time frame?
>
> -Dave
Only 10 days for my mail to arrive on the list, that's n
I could have written your email word for word! I've been trying to keep
Apache/mod_ssl running on WIN32 since early December, and still haven't
figured out what's wrong. Josef's patch seemed to work for him, but even
after applying it, my SSL-enabled Apache only runs
i no longer have access to an ssl log.
-son
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Jay Burgess wrote:
> I could have written your email word for word! I've been trying to keep
> Apache/mod_ssl running on WIN32 since early December, and still haven't
> figured out what's wrong. Josef's
Don't have heavy load yet myself, but afraid I will have same problem on one machine.
Here is my thinking from experience with other code:
Heavy load and Win32 indicates the problem has to do with concurrency by threading.
Reasoning: Easy load doesn't cause much concurrency. And u
it to work on win32. It would be interesting if the people involved
in the porting of Apache on Win32 would take the time to write a sort of
"developer howto", (or if it exists already, mail the pointers to it :)
explaining like you said how to debug apache modules and the apache code
its
I used this very good HOWTO document by Balázs Bárány.
http://tud.at/programm/apache-ssl-win32-howto.php3
Besides that I also had set KeepAlive to Off to work around a multithreading
problem.
Another tip is to compile OpenSSL with ms\do_ms instead of ms\do_masm. The
masm compilation generated
blem. I agree there must be some problem
>in the threading code. I tried apache 2.0 with mod_ssl but I couldn't
>get it to work on win32. It would be interesting if the people involved
>in the porting of Apache on Win32 would take the time to write a sort of
>"developer h
eavy refreshing causes apache to crash.
- Enrico
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Leo Baschy
Sent: January 17, 2002 4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod-ssl on win32 (mod_ssl bug 569, apache crash)
If you indeed refresh then t
Seems to be the known problem then. You have your workaround in your own answer.
KeepAlive Off. Of course you'd only want that inside your
and there actually is a recommended
SetEnvIf User-Agent ".*MSIE.*" \
nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown \
downgrade-1.0 force-respon
t's a
workaround but yes, it works.
- Enrico
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 19, 2002 12:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod-ssl on win32 (mod_ssl bug 569, apache crash)
Seems to be the known problem
I encountered the same problem in Windows2000 (w/all the rest being the same
as you).
Has this bug been officially submitted?
>From: "Henri Hennebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Apache/2.0.32 (W
Full_Name: Caitlin Howell
Version: 2.3.5
OS: Windows Workstation 4.0
Submission from: proxy3.fm.intel.com (132.233.247.6)
I compiled Apache for Win32 with OpenSSL and mod_ssl, according to the
directions available on the respective web sites. Everything works great,
except for the
t;Anyone else out there, who has Apache with mod_ssl higher than 2.4.10
> >up and running ???
>
> Both 2.5.1 and 2.6.0 compile and run fine with vc++ 5.0 (OpenSSL 0.9.4 and
>WinNT/SP6).
>
> With vc++ 6.0 we had to insert following lines into mod_ssl.h (OS headers
> se
> > #ifdef WIN32
> > #include
> > #endif
> >
> > These additions work also with vc++ 5.0
>
> Ok, I've added these lines to mod_ssl.h for 2.6.1.
Just checked it with NT5 and Win98. Works fine for both.
Daniel
ot;Marco A. Zamora Cunningham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:48 AM
Subject: Crypto Export restrictions (was:
Apache_1.3.26-Mod_SSL_2.8.10-OpenSSL_0.9.6g-Win32.zip)
> Cliff Wooley:
> > But there's a reason we can'
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Ken C wrote:
> >From what I've seen a "permit" may be required, for export / downloads to
> non-US locations. "Hosting" servers may need to have the ability to deny
> downloads to locations that shouldn't have it. (don't ask me, I'm just
> reading this stuff)
> While it has r
sage -
From: "Cliff Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: Crypto Export restrictions (was:
Apache_1.3.26-Mod_SSL_2.8.10-OpenSSL_0.9.6g-Win32.zip)
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Ken C wrote:
>
> >
Ken Campney wrote:
> Everyone have their reading glasses on?
>
> In an effort to get to the meat of the issue without all the "mind numbing"
> legal double talk I made a couple of phone calls.
> (I figured what the hell, they take what they want from my income, I'll make
> them regret answering t
No problem.
Actually the only information I was looking for was who
"Apache_1.3.26-Mod_SSL_2.8.10-OpenSSL_0.9.6g-Win32.zip"
actually belonged to (is it Apache, OpenSSL, or Mod_ssl)
There are a few US mirrors setup on the modssl.org so it's just a matter of
making sure ever
ERRR.
Do I have the right file name?? lol
What ever the file name/names in need of a depot is, I'm assuming it was
"Apache_1.3.26-Mod_SSL_2.8.10-OpenSSL_0.9.6g-Win32.zip"
Ken
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Campney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROT
Ken Campney wrote:
> ERRR.
>
> Do I have the right file name?? lol
>
> What ever the file name/names in need of a depot is, I'm assuming it was
> "Apache_1.3.26-Mod_SSL_2.8.10-OpenSSL_0.9.6g-Win32.zip"
>
> Ken
> - Original Message -
>
Ken,
The source for:
- Apache_1.3.26-Mod_SSL_2.8.10-OpenSSL_0.9.6g-Win32.zip
- Openssl-0.9.6g-Win32.zip
2002.09.21 12.08 3,066,788 apache_1.3.26-win32-src.zip
2002.09.18 04.32 753,241 mod_ssl-2.8.10-1.3.26.tar.gz.tar
2002.09.21 12.09 2,170,570 openssl-0.9.6g.tar.gz.tar
The source for
Chris,
I've downloaded your files just to make sure I have them.
Do you think ".tgz" files will be needed or are the access for those a
little better than the Win32 files?
When everything is set, I'll give you the link/links to the files.
As a secondary thought, I suppose
Ken Campney wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I've downloaded your files just to make sure I have them.
>
> Do you think ".tgz" files will be needed or are the access for those a
> little better than the Win32 files?
>
> When everything is set, I'll give you the
To everybody following this discussion, I have located the following :)
This information was obtained from
http://www.bis.doc.gov/Encryption/EncFAQs6_17_02.html#6
When is a "review request" or "notification" NOT required?
No review or notification is required to export any encryption item to
ov
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 11:17:39AM +0800, buoyant wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I want to build a apache web server supporting mod_ssl under win32 platform. And I
>wonder if I could get it as building under linux. Please give me some advice.
>
Reading the install file would be a
Howdy
I found a solution to my problem. There is a bug in the recvwithtimeout function
that came with Apache (buff.c), and which was used for SSL_recvwithtimeout.
In short: the select() in WIN32 has a bug. There is a workaround which is
already contained in sendwithtimeout. Applying this also
Full_Name: Peter Arrenbrecht
Version: 2.8.1
OS: Windows 2000
Submission from: (NULL) (193.247.162.250)
Description of crash of mod_ssl on Win2K
Netscape 4.7 causes Apache/mod_ssl to crash on Win32 when accessing a secure
page. There seems to be an
Full_Name: kilesa
Version: mod_ssl 2.8.2 for Apache 1.3.19
OS: windows 2000
Submission from: (NULL) (61.163.225.2)
mod_ssl 2.8.2 for Apache 1.3.19 under windows 2000:
Found :
Syntax error on line 1 of d:/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load d:/apache/modules/mod_ssl.so into server: (126)
"Load
The compiled version of Apache/1.3.22 (Win32) mod_ssl/2.8.5 OpenSSL/0.9b
PHP4.0.6 is running stable on my development machine. When moving it to my
production environment Apache stops without showing any error. It doesn't
produce the error.log file. The only thing I get is these four erro
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Caitlin Howell
> Version: 2.3.5
> OS: Windows Workstation 4.0
> Submission from: proxy3.fm.intel.com (132.233.247.6)
>
> I compiled Apache for Win32 with OpenSSL and mod_ssl, according to the
> directions availa
e.
BA> Can I assume, that the structure is exactly the same as before ?
BA> Alfred
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Kristijan Cafuta RIP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2002 13:14
>> An: Boehme, Alfred
>> Betreff: Re: Ap
I can confirm this also happens with Netscape 4.08.
--Craig
Craig Huckabee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Compliance Corporation
SPAWAR Systems Center-Charleston, SC
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.or
shouldnt it be
LoadModule ssl_module modules/mod_ssl.so
not ssh_module
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2001 10:49 AM
Subject: [BugDB] cannot load modules for win32'
Title: RE: [BugDB] cannot load modules for win32's apache 1.3.19 (PR#543)
Hi,
On wint NT , you must define in your PATH , the directory where the openssl.exe file is stored.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathon Douglas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: samedi, 7. avril 2001 19:
Hi all,
Does anyone know something about the following
WIN32-apache-modssl and/or WIN32-apache problem as described below?
In short:
It seems that any WIN32-apache (I tried) has this problem:
They cannot display pages (I need mainly https:// but also tried
http://) with many images in a
this helps some one else out. It cost me a few days.
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Willart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 7:27 PM
Subject: Win32 mod_ssl runs on one Win2000 box but not on another..
>
Full_Name: Tran Duc Trung
Version: 2.3.10-1.3.6
OS: Win32
Submission from: host.133.52.ixos.de (149.235.133.52)
mod_ssl on Win32 emits a warning "Failed to acquire global mutex"
in ssl.log. This is a bug in ssl_engine_mutex.c
...
rc = ap_acquire_mutex((mutex *)mc-&g
nnes Bertscheit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 8:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WIN32-apache 1.3.x (windows NT) problem of serving concurrent
https requests
Hi all,
Does anyone know something about the following
WIN32-apache-modssl and/
On Thu, Jul 29, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Tran Duc Trung
> Version: 2.3.10-1.3.6
> OS: Win32
> Submission from: host.133.52.ixos.de (149.235.133.52)
>
> mod_ssl on Win32 emits a warning "Failed to acquire global mutex"
> in ssl.log. This
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Full_Name: Tran Duc Trung
> > Version: 2.3.10-1.3.6
> > OS: Win32
> > Submission from: host.133.52.ixos.de (149.235.133.52)
> >
> > mod_ssl on Win32 emits a warning "
201 - 300 of 310 matches
Mail list logo
