Hi,
This is regarding using Apache server with mod_ssl and mod_gsoap
modules. I am confused as to who would handle the certificate
verification in such a case where the directive 'SSLVerifyClient' is set
to 2. I understand gSoap has it' own authentication layer for users and
might actually inte
, 2005 9:10 PM
To: modssl-users@modssl.org
Subject: Problem starting mod_ssl and apache
All,
I am having an interesting problem where I am
getting the following error message when I start
Apache:
Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/mod_sxnet.so into server: shared object not open
I have built the following
All,
I am having an interesting problem where I am
getting the following error message when I start
Apache:
Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/mod_sxnet.so into server: shared object not open
I have built the following rpms from their source
packages, which are all the latest versions.
(apache-1.3.33,
Sorry, I have a mistake in configuration in reality the directives in
ssl.conf are :
>
RewriteEngineon
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} !=on
RewriteRule ^/home/httpd/html/telechargement/(.*)$
https://%{SERVER_NAME}/telechargement/$1 [R,L]
I test http://machine.site/telechargement/fichier.htmlwriteEn
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Mod_ssl and apache 2.0.40
>
>
>Hello,
>
>I install on a PC linux redhat 8.0 a web server apache 2.0.40
>and mod ssl
>0.9.6b (configuration include in redhat 8.0)
>
>I want to access a directory of my site with ssl. The
>directory s
Hello,
I install on a PC linux redhat 8.0 a web server apache 2.0.40 and mod ssl
0.9.6b (configuration include in redhat 8.0)
I want to access a directory of my site with ssl. The directory site pages
have been written in html without ssl.
To avoid the rewritting of all pages, I try to put the fo
Hiya
Yesterday we upgraded on of our http servers from apache 1.3.26 to
1.3.27 with the equalent version of mod_ssl.
root@nextgeneration:/usr/src/other/php# /usr/local/apache/bin/apachectl startssl
Apache/1.3.27 mod_ssl/2.8.12 (Pass Phrase Dialog)
Some of your private key files are encrypted for
J. B. Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 October 2002 20:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NS7 sees cert diff in Apache 1.3+mod_ssl and Apache 2
[I had to be out of the office, sorry to be slow in following up]
Thanks for the reply, Jose. Either I posed my question poorly or I
don't
tore (ot its higher parent) then there is no way its
> going to recognize it as a trusted certificate.
>
> Regards
> Jose
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: J. B. Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 03 October 2002 17:41
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
: J. B. Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 October 2002 17:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NS7 sees cert diff in Apache 1.3+mod_ssl and Apache 2
Hi.
My production server is currently running
Server: Apache/1.3.26 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.8.10 OpenSSL/0.9.6g
and I'm test driving
S
Hi.
My production server is currently running
Server: Apache/1.3.26 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.8.10 OpenSSL/0.9.6g
and I'm test driving
Server: Apache/2.0.42 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.42 OpenSSL/0.9.6g
I have a secure server certificate from Verisign, and the intermediate cert from
their website installe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> HI chris ,
>
> I have a Debian version of Linux .
> I will try to re-install apache itself and copy the httpd.conf , I currenlty
> have . Right now our debian server is used by a testing organization to
> test our applications residing on this server.
>
> thought
HI chris ,
I have a Debian version of Linux .
I will try to re-install apache itself and copy the httpd.conf , I currenlty
have . Right now our debian server is used by a testing organization to
test our applications residing on this server.
thought there should be some way to add mod_ssl w
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 02:23:11AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey ,
>
> I too have the same requirement. I want to install(add module) only mod_ssl
> to existing apache and openssl . Many sites explain how to install apache
> with mod_ssl from their sources. but no where I found how to ad
ule alone.
>
> I appreciate if any one can help us in doing this.
>
> thanks
> ibrahim
>
> Original Message:
> -
> From: Andreas Schnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 17:31:35 +0200
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: mod_ssl and ap
Andreas Schnell wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I try to install mod_ssl.
>
> The problem is that the install manual just describes how to install it
> together with apache and openssl.
>
> Well... I have Apache 1.3.26 and openssl 0.9.6c already installed and
> don't want to remove it just to install mo
Due to unaviodable circumstances, I am away from the office until the Monday 30th
September 2002
I will get back to you as soon as i can on my return.
If it's an urgent Online Learning Support Unit / Web/ MUBSWEB/ MUBS Online matter
that requires urgent attention then please contact either K
this.
thanks
ibrahim
Original Message:
-
From: Andreas Schnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 17:31:35 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_ssl and apache 1.3.26
Hey,
I try to install mod_ssl.
The problem is that the install manual just describes how to install
Hey,
I try to install mod_ssl.
The problem is that the install manual just
describes how to install it together with apache and openssl.
Well... I have Apache 1.3.26 and openssl 0.9.6c
already installed and don't want to remove it just to install
mod_ssl.
Is there any way to install m
Excuse me, I'm new:
I've got the new server up and working, however I had several errors
when I tried to instantiate the SSL server. I thought I'd run these by you.
I followed the manual to the letter regarding the installation of the
mod_ssl and I've now got a apache webserver working through
Hello,
I am trying to configure apache v1.3.14 with mod_ssl v2.7.1 and OpenSSl
v0.9.6. The OS is Solaris 7. Everything compiled nicely and apache started
up fine. But with the startssl option I get these errors:
Syntax error on line 208 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/loca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here here!
>
> P.S. I want to thank Ralf for his excellent work!
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6bxsa94g6ZVmFMoIRAvFCAKCVkvE9EkPTv1y4fpZyrpYwKdKG7gCgxgMw
7r4f0qx2
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001, ModSSL user wrote:
> A direct question to Ralf, will you port mod_ssl to Apache 2.0 ?
Yes.
> API tends to move less (even if ap_r* are still discussed) and we may
> see a first beta in some weeks.
>
> Not related but Apache 2.0 is still using mm-1.1.1 (patched) and you're
> A direct question to Ralf, will you port mod_ssl to Apache 2.0 ?
>
> API tends to move less (even if ap_r* are still discussed) and we may
> see a first beta in some weeks.
Hi,
As the first who tried to give a detailed answer for a similar question
in this list (about a year ago), let me say
Hi,
A direct question to Ralf, will you port mod_ssl to Apache 2.0 ?
API tends to move less (even if ap_r* are still discussed) and we may
see a first beta in some weeks.
Not related but Apache 2.0 is still using mm-1.1.1 (patched) and you're
at mm-1.1.3. Will you also release a mm-1.1.4 with t
modssl-users |
|| |
|+--->
>|
||
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| cc: (bcc: Tim Power/LON/GB/Reuters) |
| Subject:
Hi,
It would help if you named the OS your intending to use apache on :-)
Lanny
In our last ferocious thread of wars on January 11, 2001 04:49 pm, gavin.java
wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I just joined the list and this is my first attempt to install the mod_SSL.
> I downloaded mod_ssl-2.7.1-1.3.14 fr
Title: Re: mod_SSL and Apache.
I running OSX Server.
gavin
From: Lanny Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Freedom Technologies Corporation
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 23:20:53 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "gavin.java" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mod_SSL and Apache.
Hi List,
I just joined the list and this is my first attempt to install the mod_SSL.
I downloaded mod_ssl-2.7.1-1.3.14 from the web site and was reading the
instructions
and it mentions nothing about OSX but only Unix and Windows. Do I have the
correct version?
Is it pretty easy to install? We c
At 02:18 PM 3/29/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Sorry for the number of messages on this. I _must_ be doing something
>wrong, as I cannot believe that it takes one over 24hrs to get Apache, mm,
>mod_ssl and mod_perl going.
Here's my standard procedure for doing all this except MM:
MAKING APACHE w
Sorry for the number of messages on this. I _must_ be doing something
wrong, as I cannot believe that it takes one over 24hrs to get Apache, mm,
mod_ssl and mod_perl going.
I got the thing to compile, and there's a libperl.a file sitting in
src/modules/perl now.
From the Apache source root,
Greets!
I recently posted a message concerning problems I'm having getting mod_ssl
and mod_perl to go. It turns out I missed one error message in the
configure process of mod_perl (in addition to a warning earlier display,
which I thought I could ignore) - it complains about a missing gdbm
c
Actually, you have good documentation here, however, please submit the
EXACT typed in instructions that you did, not just a copy and paste from
the install file. Include also a directory tree for the subdirectories
affected.
Are you using some or all of the OPTIONAL stuff?
the -fPIC could scre
I cant install apache with mod_ssl, I have already successfully had a
previous
Apache install 1.3.9 with no special components. BTW i did remove that
install and its source. Im using a mandrake 6.0 with a 2.2.12 kernel
and perl 5.005something.
This is what I have done so far, its *basically*
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> Then this is a client problem! The server cannot do anything here. At least
> Netscape is very smart and remembers that he is reconnecting to a server with
> a GlobalID cert and then _immediately_ starts with a strong cipher and never
> does the stepup again (at least
On Tue, Mar 23, 1999, Patrik Carlsson wrote:
> Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> > Don't look at Microsoft papers when you want to understand anything, please.
> > Instead look inside the SSLv3 spec or the TLSv1 RFC. Yes, the stuff is called
> > renegotation of parameters and is nothing more than
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> Don't look at Microsoft papers when you want to understand anything, please.
> Instead look inside the SSLv3 spec or the TLSv1 RFC. Yes, the stuff is called
> renegotation of parameters and is nothing more than a new SSL handshake, of
> course. The interesting point
On Tue, Mar 23, 1999, Patrik Carlsson wrote:
> How does this stepup really works?
I'm surprised that the README.GlobalID document isn't detailed enough...
> The server has this special GSID certificate, but is he otherwise "modified"
> (he must be able to use strong ciphers) in some way to be
How does this stepup really works?
The server has this special GSID certificate, but is he otherwise
"modified" (he must
be able to use strong ciphers) in some way to be able to handle the
stepup?
Isn't it actually just a client issue, i.e. the client sees the GSID
and, in the Netscape
case, fini
Hi,
first, it's a great mailinglist. I had no problems running mod_ssl under
linux and irix, but we haven't started the practical test ;). mod_ssl is
just great, and easy to use!
This offer is very kind and just CooL!!
---
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > > course) for my with Apache 1.3.2 + mod_s
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> > Needless to say, commpiling code isn't my area of expertise, and
> > so being pressed into getting it all up and running an hour before
> > the deadline didn't do much for my humour. They picked up where
> > I left off and it's now working fine. Thanks for your
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> Yes. But as long as people don't get really impertinent it's acceptable, at
> least to me. I know how frustrating it is when other people have a piece of
> software running but it will not run on my local environment for some strange
> reasons I cannot figure out my
Robert Fournerat wrote:
>
> *I* believe that the user takes ALL responsibility for getting
> free and open source software working. I also believe that
> this is the nature of free software. Others have already said
> that it does work and are trying to help. It is inappropriate
> for anyone t
In article <> you wrote:
> Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>> Ok, I make you an offer: Create a temporary rse account on your box which has
>> around 15 MB free disk space available and I'll try to setup Apache on your
>> box and debug the code on your specific platform. I'm sure it's a local
>> plat
In article <> you wrote:
>[...]
> *I* believe that the user takes ALL responsibility for getting
> free and open source software working. I also believe that
> this is the nature of free software. Others have already said
> that it does work and are trying to help. It is inappropriate
> fo
James H.G. Redekop wrote:
>
> Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> >
> > I've compared his config file with the default config. Just harmless path
> > differences. And his config file runs fine (after changing the paths, of
> > course) for my with Apache 1.3.2 + mod_ssl 1.3.2. Seems I've now even to bui
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> Ok, I make you an offer: Create a temporary rse account on your box which has
> around 15 MB free disk space available and I'll try to setup Apache on your
> box and debug the code on your specific platform. I'm sure it's a local
> platform problem, but we cannot fi
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998, James H.G. Redekop wrote:
> Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> >
> > I've compared his config file with the default config. Just harmless path
> > differences. And his config file runs fine (after changing the paths, of
> > course) for my with Apache 1.3.2 + mod_ssl 1.3.2. Seems
> Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> >
> > I've compared his config file with the default config. Just harmless path
> > differences. And his config file runs fine (after changing the paths, of
> > course) for my with Apache 1.3.2 + mod_ssl 1.3.2. Seems I've now even to build
> > with JRun to find the
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> I've compared his config file with the default config. Just harmless path
> differences. And his config file runs fine (after changing the paths, of
> course) for my with Apache 1.3.2 + mod_ssl 1.3.2. Seems I've now even to build
> with JRun to find the problem, pe
In article <> you wrote:
> I'm sure you have some SSL-conf-stuff outside of your SSL-enabled
> Virtual-host or/and started apache without SSL-enabled!
[...]
I've compared his config file with the default config. Just harmless path
differences. And his config file runs fine (after changing the
JRun is not the problem - it run's fine with mod_ssl (apache 1.3.2).
JRUN is a servlet-extension like jserv from http://java.apache.org.
I'm sure you have some SSL-conf-stuff outside of your SSL-enabled
Virtual-host or/and started apache without SSL-enabled!
e.g.:
SSLEngine on
will cause thi
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 02, 1998, James H.G. Redekop wrote:
>
> > > > I am attempting to compile & run Apache 1.3.1 with mod_ssl, and
> > > > I'm running into a serious problem. The httpd halts immediately on
> > > > being run with a "required SSLCacheServerPort not supplied"
On Fri, Oct 02, 1998, James H.G. Redekop wrote:
> > > I am attempting to compile & run Apache 1.3.1 with mod_ssl, and
> > > I'm running into a serious problem. The httpd halts immediately on
> > > being run with a "required SSLCacheServerPort not supplied" error,
> > > even though I *do* supply
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 02, 1998, James H.G. Redekop wrote:
>
> > I am attempting to compile & run Apache 1.3.1 with mod_ssl, and
> > I'm running into a serious problem. The httpd halts immediately on
> > being run with a "required SSLCacheServerPort not supplied" error,
> >
On Fri, Oct 02, 1998, James H.G. Redekop wrote:
> I am attempting to compile & run Apache 1.3.1 with mod_ssl, and
> I'm running into a serious problem. The httpd halts immediately on
> being run with a "required SSLCacheServerPort not supplied" error,
> even though I *do* supply an SSLCacheServe
I am attempting to compile & run Apache 1.3.1 with mod_ssl, and
I'm running into a serious problem. The httpd halts immediately on
being run with a "required SSLCacheServerPort not supplied" error,
even though I *do* supply an SSLCacheServerPort -- in fact, I lifted
the configuration directly fro
57 matches
Mail list logo
