They should have guessed that Bonnie and Clyde would try to stage a robbery!
Tommy
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
, that the
show seemed hours SHORTER than usual when it was not.
Joe B in NOLA
--- On Mon, 2/28/11, Toochis Morin fly...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Toochis Morin fly...@pacbell.net
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Date: Monday, February 28, 2011, 1:25 AM
Yep
Bonelli
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 9:55 AM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars-- Best show in years!
Now, Toochis and Channing, I have to totally disagree!!!
Whereas LAST year's Oscar broadcast was indeed the WORST I've ever seen, I
felt that all those kinks
I'm the Most Clueless Collector.
Regards,
DBT
From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Kirby
McDaniel
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 12:06 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars-- Best show in years!
Worst show ever??? I disagree
List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Kirby
McDaniel
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 12:06 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars-- Best show in years!
Worst show ever??? I disagree. I thought the show was pretty good.
Mounting this telecast
see the screen!
FRANC
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of
Joseph Bonelli
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 9:55 AM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars-- Best show in years!
Now, Toochis and Channing, I have
1457 Guava Avenue
Melbourne, FL 32935
(PLEASE NOTE NEW ADDRESS!!)
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:25:50 -0800
From: fly...@pacbell.net
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Yep.
From: channinglylethomson channinglylethom...@att.net
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent
Clearly Franco was not there...even in his green room interview before the
show began he looked tired and was basically paying lip service to the
interveiwer his mind was elswhere as it was through the show..he looked like
a deer caught in the headlights and Hathaway couldn't do it on her own..As
At 05:32 PM 2/28/2011, Alan Heimann wrote:
why not do away with gender based categories and have best actor or
actress as one category and the same for best supporting...Alan
Alan.. I think making all things in life endogenous would be a
negative and not a positive
Visit the MoPo
I've seen MANY Academy Awards telecasts and that was absolutely the
worst one ever. .
Channing
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Yep.
From: channinglylethomson channinglylethom...@att.net
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Sun, February 27, 2011 9:19:08 PM
Subject: [MOPO] Oscars
I've seen MANY Academy Awards telecasts and that was absolutely the worst one
ever. .
Channing
and Proust is long. FRANC
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of David
Kusumoto
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 10:47 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS and MoPo Turns 14 Today!
Franc -- You're suggesting I'm biased
great.or at least NM. Even Quiz Show was VF.
DBT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/douglasbtaylor Profile
From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce
Hershenson
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 1:22 AM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS and MoPo
and Proust is long. FRANC
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of David
Kusumoto
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 10:47 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS and MoPo Turns 14 Today!
Franc -- You're suggesting I'm biased
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Cc: fdav...@verizon.net
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS and MoPo Turns 14 Today!
FRANK - please SHUT UP about politics! kusomoto liked the movie, just
not as much as you. dude, your too intense.
_
Re: [MOPO] OSCARS and MoPo Turns 14 Today!
Franc
Wed, 25 Feb
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Cc: fdav...@verizon.net
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS and MoPo Turns 14 Today!
FRANK - please SHUT UP about politics! kusomoto liked the movie, just not as
much as you. dude, your too intense.
_
Re: [MOPO] OSCARS and MoPo Turns 14 Today!
Franc
Wed, 25 Feb 2009
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Date: Sunday, February 22, 2009, 7:51 PM
i agree doug...
that was PATHETIC.
jeff
On Feb 22, 2009, at 5:38 PM, Doug Taylor wrote:
If that opening number is any indication, this will be the most
grueling 3 hours of our lives.
My gawd.
DBT
At 10:53 AM 2/23/2009, rixpost...@aol.com wrote:
Over the past few years, I've noticed that the level of
songwriting in the Best Song Academy Award category has
diminished to the point of pure mediocrity. Not only are only THREE
songs nominated (didn't it always used to be 5?), but the
At 12:18 PM 2/23/2009, David Kusumoto wrote:
I was extremely disappointed with Sean Penn's win. Sean Penn is an
outstanding actor who gave an uncharacteristically loose, engaging
and wonderful turn as an heroic figure -- in what I thought was a
conventionally structured,
, Toochis Morin wrote:
I agree with your comments. I wish Peter Gabriel got to perform his song.
toochis
From: Jeff Potokar jpotok...@ca.rr.com
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:31:47 AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS---WHATEVER HAPPENED TO GREAT SONGS?
i agree, rick
At 02:06 PM 2/23/2009, Dave Smith wrote:
Did they even show Heath during the memorium segment? I was waiting
to see the audience reaction and I don't recall they showed him. And
he did pass away in '08 so he should have been included?
They did show it. Last year. He died just prior to last
At 02:37 PM 2/23/2009, Jeff Potokar wrote:
that's right...he was memorialized last year technically, incorrect
It was not technically, incorrect. It's people who died *in the* last year,
not people who died last year. There's nothing about it being for those
dead before December
many people had problems reading the names on the flat screens. some
camera shots were zoomed out too much, or those on crane arms moving
from one flat screen to the other often made it a bit of a distraction.
the simple full screen presentation of this montage with music
playing beneath
.
--- On Sun, 2/22/09, Jeff Potokar jpotok...@ca.rr.com wrote:
From: Jeff Potokar jpotok...@ca.rr.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Date: Sunday, February 22, 2009, 7:51 PM
i agree doug...
that was PATHETIC.
jeff
On Feb 22, 2009, at 5:38 PM, Doug Taylor wrote:
If that opening
The rules for what qualifies as best song are just plain stupid. it's a good
thing they are going back to the drawing board on this one.
Richard
Richard Del Belso
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:36:57 -0800
From: cr...@wolfmill.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS---WHATEVER HAPPENED TO GREAT
a box office failure.
Could its weighty ideas been explored as effectively for less money?
Maybe. But what a handsome picture it is.
-d.
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:53:11 -0800
To: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com
From: cr...@wolfmill.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] MOPO] OSCARS
CC: MoPo-L
force of Rourke's performance.
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:57:32 -0600
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS
From: brucehershen...@gmail.com
To: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com
CC: MoPo-L@listserv.american.edu
David wrote: This was, by far, Sean Penn's best performance. He's a heavily
mannered actor whose
the film is not a great film, it's certainly far
superior to The Wrestler. FRANC
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of David
Kusumoto
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 3:43 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS
Hi
certainly far superior to The Wrestler. FRANC
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of
David Kusumoto
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 3:43 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS
Hi Bruce -- Because of the multiple
Oddly enough I feel the way about posts to MOPO!
Glenn T.
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Potokar
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS
this is the great thing about expressing one's opinions how 2 people
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS
Bruce, I'd recommend you drive the two hours to see MILK which was a terrific
film, whereas The Wrestler was so-so. Mickey Rourke gave a very good
performance but I kept thinking he was actually playing himself whereas
year in many.
Doug
- Original Message -
From: Franc
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS
Bruce, I'd recommend you drive the two hours to see MILK which was
a terrific film, whereas The Wrestler was so-so. Mickey Rourke gave
2009 13:33:07 -0800
From: jpotok...@ca.rr.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
this is the great thing about expressing one's opinions how 2 people can
watch a film, look at art, etc. and one can say the piece, image or film is
great..and another can say it is so-so
: jpotok...@ca.rr.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
this is the great thing about expressing one's opinions how 2 people can
watch a film, look at art, etc. and one can say the piece, image or film is
great..and another can say it is so-so...
jeff
-Original
...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of David
Kusumoto
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 6:39 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS and MoPo Turns 14 Today!
** I think everyone has acquitted themselves well in this debate.
Though my feelings about Rourke and The Wrestler -- vs. Penn
Franc -- You're suggesting I'm biased against gays. While using the collective
first person plural we -- you said my political slant and core ideology
prevented me from being open minded, i.e., loving a film as much as you did.
Suit yourself. I AM a pompous know-it-all, I DO write
and this was the film that was going to do it. This is
a film that will be just a great on your t.v.
Sue
-Original Message-
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:33:07 -0800
From: jpotok...@ca.rr.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
this is the great thing about expressing
i wasnt going to say anything... but Hugh has also bought a few
things from me, as well; i guess that makes him a client of mine, too.
On Feb 22, 2009, at 10:53 PM, jboh...@aol.com wrote:
Thats Funny Hugh is also a client of mine.
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
I think Hugh Jackman is a really talented guy caught last night in the
midst of a Hollywood wet dream. The show was awful and boring. I
couldn't believe the incompetence of the obituaries in which you
couldn't discern the names or images of the people being honored and
Queen Latifa had to sing
.Ben Button
4.Milk
DBT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/douglasbtaylor Profile
From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of Franc
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 9:44 AM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] MOPO] OSCARS
I think Hugh Jackman
] MOPO] OSCARS
I think Hugh Jackman is a really talented guy caught last night in the midst
of a Hollywood wet dream. The show was awful and boring. I couldn't believe
the incompetence of the obituaries in which you couldn't discern the names or
images of the people being honored and Queen
the majority of the acceptance speeches were both short and non
political.
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu]on Behalf Of
flixs...@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 8:49 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: [MOPO] OSCARS
STAGE
) and Mardi Gras (Tuesday!) to all.
--- On Sun, 2/22/09, Jeff Potokar jpotok...@ca.rr.com wrote:
From: Jeff Potokar jpotok...@ca.rr.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Date: Sunday, February 22, 2009, 7:51 PM
i agree doug...
that was PATHETIC.
jeff
On Feb 22
Overall, I think it was a more entertaining show than in past years.
My only complaint would be the obituaries which I was unable to read
even on a 37 HD flatscreen screen. I thought it moved petty fast,
Hugh Jackman was personable and charming, and the awards were
uniformly well
-
From: jim
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS
I actually enjoyed the oscars forthe first time in many years.Jackman was
better than most the idea of five past winners in a catorgory, presenting that
catagory
I think Dark Knight was the best film of 2008...It wasn't nominated because
it's a comic book adaption but it was perfect entertainment.
Why do we always have to have an arty farty film as best picture?
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
:[MOPO] Oscars
Sent by:MoPo List mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Overall, I think
- Original Message -
From: channinglylethomson channinglylethom...@worldnet.att.net
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 8:15 AM
Subject: [MOPO] Oscars
Overall, I think it was a more entertaining show than in past years. My
only complaint would be the obituaries which
All in all I thought it was a good show but what I did not like was the
segment where they honored the people who died in the last year. They
spent so much time trying to feature the singer and zooming in and out
on the screen that there were some names that you could not read. That
is not a
Over the past few years, I've noticed that the level of songwriting in the
Best Song Academy Award category has diminished to the point of pure
mediocrity. Not only are only THREE songs nominated (didn't it always used to
be
5?), but the songs that ARE nominated won't be remembered 3 or 4
/Kymars-Stuff
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu]on Behalf Of Joseph
Bonelli
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 08:05 AM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars-- best show in eons
Sorry, guys!! Totally disagree with you both. Loved
23, 2009 8:15 AM
Subject: [MOPO] Oscars
Overall, I think it was a more entertaining show than in past
years. My only complaint would be the obituaries which I was
unable to read even on a 37 HD flatscreen screen. I thought it
moved petty fast, Hugh Jackman was personable and charming
: [MOPO] Oscars
Overall, I think it was a more entertaining show than in past years.
My only complaint would be the obituaries which I was unable to read
even on a 37 HD flatscreen screen. I thought it moved petty fast,
Hugh Jackman was personable and charming, and the awards were
i agree, rick--add to that that 2 of the 3 of the nominated songs
were from SLUMDOG.
and could the composer/songwriter from SLUMDOG have been any less
ungrateful (or at least sounding and appearing so)? gimme a break
with that.
Springsteen's song should have at least been in the running.
I thought I was the only one bothered by that! A major blunder.
Bruce
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:50 PM, steve84 stev...@flash.net wrote:
All in all I thought it was a good show but what I did not like was the
segment where they honored the people who died in the last year. They spent
so
Kilmer's Canal Street ride as Bacchus)
PS-- Thank God for NO lame US-TV personality hosts!
Happy Lundi Gras (today) and Mardi Gras (Tuesday!) to all.
--- On *Sun, 2/22/09, Jeff Potokar jpotok...@ca.rr.com* wrote:
From: Jeff Potokar jpotok...@ca.rr.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars
-Original Message-
Here's a simple test... When you watched the Dark Knight, did you ever -
even for a split-second - think of the Joker as anything other than a
famous actor
.
BAFTA is not as plagued by the anomalies of Hollywood voting as AMPAS. -kuz.
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:07:55 -0500
From: lobb...@rogers.com
Subject: Re: MOPO] OSCARS
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Mickey Rourke may have been placed in the midst of a Hollywood hype, but his
performance
other
than a famous actor doing a funny (and completely un-natural) voice???
Cheers,
Bob
- Original Message - From: channinglylethomson
channinglylethom...@worldnet.att.net
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 8:15 AM
Subject: [MOPO] Oscars
Overall, I
Because arty-farty films don't have the Peoples' Choice Awards!! (Smile)
Joe B-- pleased with the Oscars in NOLA
--- On Mon, 2/23/09, jboh...@aol.com jboh...@aol.com wrote:
From: jboh...@aol.com jboh...@aol.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] MOPO] OSCARS
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Date: Monday
I loved Heath Ledger's performance. I thought he deserved the award. Damn I
wish he were here rather than him getting the award. He reached into something
very difficult to get into the Joker character. It was completely unlike him
and he went for it. I liked the film. There are some very
That segment really angered me especially since my mentor Nina Foch was being
honored.
Frustrating!
Toochis
From: Bruce Hershenson brucehershen...@gmail.com
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:37:16 AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO
I agree with your comments. I wish Peter Gabriel got to perform his song.
toochis
From: Jeff Potokar jpotok...@ca.rr.com
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:31:47 AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS---WHATEVER HAPPENED TO GREAT SONGS
@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:37:16 AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars what I didnt like
I thought I was the only one bothered by that! A major blunder.
Bruce
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:50 PM, steve84
mailto:stev...@flash.netstev...@flash.net wrote:
All in all I thought
@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:31:47 AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OSCARS---WHATEVER HAPPENED TO GREAT SONGS?
i agree, rick--add to that that 2 of the 3 of the nominated songs
were from SLUMDOG.
and could the composer/songwriter from SLUMDOG have been any less
ungrateful
@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars
-Original Message-
Here's a simple test... When you watched the Dark Knight, did you
ever -
even for a split-second - think of the Joker as anything other than a
famous actor doing a funny (and completely
@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars what I didnt like
That segment really angered me especially since my mentor Nina Foch was being
honored.
Frustrating!
Toochis
Deals
- Original Message -
From: Toochis Morin
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars what I didnt like
That segment really angered me especially since my mentor Nina Foch
was being honored.
Frustrating!
Toochis
From: Bruce
-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars what I didnt like
That segment really angered me especially since my mentor Nina Foch was being
honored.
Frustrating!
Toochis
: Re: [MOPO] Oscars what I didnt like
Did they even show Heath during the memorium segment? I was waiting to see
the audience reaction and I don't recall they showed him. And he did pass away
in '08 so he should have been included?
Dave Smith
Reel Deals
- Original Message
@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars what I didnt like
Did they even show Heath during the memorium segment? I was waiting to see the
audience reaction and I don't recall they showed him. And he did pass away in
'08 so he should have been included?
Dave
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars what I didnt like
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Date: Monday, February 23, 2009, 4:30 PM
#yiv363736254 DIV {
MARGIN:0px;}
Yup, here he is in last year's montage, at the very end:
http://www.truveo.com/80th-Annual-Academy-Awards-In-Memorium/id/3619081301
Dave
: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:37 am
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars what I didnt like
I thought I was the only one bothered by that! A major blunder.
?
Bruce
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:50 PM, steve84 stev...@flash.net wrote:
All in all I thought it was a good show but what I did not like was the segment
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars what I didnt like
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Date: Monday, February 23, 2009, 4:30 PM
Yup, here he is in last year's montage, at the very end:
http://www.truveo.com/80th-Annual-Academy-Awards-In-Memorium/id/
3619081301
Dave
www.posteropolis.com
- Original
:29 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars what I didnt like
that's right...he was memorialized last year technically, incorrect but
i guess the academy wanted to remind everyone while his passing was still
fresh... a year later, it would have not have received the same audience
response
almost every week of the year.
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Toochis Morin
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars what I didnt like
I heard some claps for Charlton Heston. I know he had fans in the business
for Charlton Heston. I know he had fans in the
business. Not huge but most of the older actors didn't get huge
applause.
Toochis
From: Jeff Potokar jpotok...@ca.rr.com
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 2:37:29 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars what I didnt like
from HIGH SCHOOL MUSICAL stars.
that is insulting to those that are and were.
jeff
- Original Message -
From: Toochis Morin
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars what I didnt like
I agree Jeff. But I do think
: Re: [MOPO] Oscars
i agree glenn..
why does NO ONE consider that Ledger OD'd because he voluntarily CHOSE
to consume a literal pharmacy of pills that caused his death? what a
moron. does anyone remember the initial stories talking about the
menagerie of drugs found at his apt? why reward someone
know how you both feel about Marilyn Monroe, Judy
Garland and Charles Boyer. FRANC
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of
Glenn Taranto
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 5:21 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars
@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars what I didnt like
Maybe there were a few claps, toochis; i should say that i didnt hear
many.. but that's also the other thing... so many of these younger, new
hollywood stars--and i used that term with tongue planted firmly in
cheek-- do not even know who
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars
franc,
your guess would be wrong, as i don't recall any of those 3 winning an
oscar for a performance, after they had passed away.
THAT was the point and jist of the posts, not as to who had drug
problems and succumbed to them.
jeff
On Feb 23, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Franc
If that opening number is any indication, this will be the most grueling 3
hours of our lives.
My gawd.
DBT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/douglasbtaylor Profile
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
i agree doug...
that was PATHETIC.
jeff
On Feb 22, 2009, at 5:38 PM, Doug Taylor wrote:
If that opening number is any indication, this will be the most
grueling 3 hours of our lives.
My gawd.
DBT
Profile
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
who the hell is Huge Jackman?...I'm going to bed
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List on behalf of Jeff Potokar
Sent: Sun 2/22/2009 8:51 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars
i agree doug...
that was PATHETIC.
jeff
On Feb 22, 2009, at 5:38 PM, Doug Taylor
Subject: [MOPO] OSCARS
STAGE DOOR has just started on TCM! After hearing the interminable intros
of each supporting actress by past winners .I promise you Kate,
Adolph, Lucy, Ginger and cast will be far more
entertaining...BTW this movie buries THE WOMEN my guess
Hugh Jackman is actually a client of ours.
David Lieberman
_CineMasterpieces.com_ (http://www.cinemasterpieces.com/) | 15721 N.
Greenway Hayden Loop, Suite 105 -- Scottsdale, Az 85260
Vintage Original Movie Posters | 602 309 0500 | Office/Gallery Open By Appt.
Only.
**A
He's talented and a great sport.
Toochis
From: David Lieberman dli...@aol.com
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 6:45:57 PM
Subject: [MOPO] MOPO] OSCARS
Hugh Jackman is actually a client of ours.
David Lieberman
Thats Funny Hugh is also a client of mine.
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message
Well said, Joe!
Shelly
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:39:27 -0800From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [MOPO] Oscars
Are a TV Ratings DudTo: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Who cares if the Hoi Polloi had another piece of Idol junk to watch!!!
The Oscars are an INTERNATIONAL EVENT!
Screw the silly US E
http://ckmac.com/
Kymar's on eBay http://stores.ebay.com/Kymars-Stuff
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ari Richards
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 03:45 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars Are a TV Ratings Dud
I admit
.
Franc
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bruce Hershenson
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 7:19 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars -SNOOZEABLE
Franc Martarella wrote, I though Daniel Day Lewis and Marion
Cotillard
it was damn hard to watch because every character was so easy to dislike.
DBT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/douglasbtaylor Profile
From: MoPo List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kirby
McDaniel
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:08 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars
I thought the show was pretty good considering the problems that
surrounded its production.
Political jokes have been around the Oscars for years, so that's
nothing new. Jon Stewart
smirky little presence is perfect for the Oscars in this era. This
years films were so serious
and so good,
It's Official:
Oscars Are a TV Ratings Dud
By Associated Press
8:18 AM EST, February 26, 2008
NEW YORK
The Oscars are a ratings dud. Nielsen Media Research says preliminary ratings
for the 80th annual Academy Awards telecast are 14 percent lower than the
least-watched ceremony
] On Behalf Of
Bruce Hershenson
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 7:19 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars -SNOOZEABLE
Franc Martarella wrote, I though Daniel Day Lewis and Marion
Cotillard gave two of the worst over-the-top, scenery-chewing,
histrionic
see what happens when I forget to watch The Oscars®... last time i
forgot was
Like.. what 2003?
Movielegends wrote:
It's Official:
Oscars Are a TV Ratings Dud
By Associated Press
8:18 AM EST, February 26, 2008
NEW YORK
The Oscars are a ratings dud. Nielsen Media Research says preliminary
Who cares if the Hoi Polloi had another piece of Idol junk to watch!!!
The Oscars are an INTERNATIONAL EVENT!
Screw the silly US E-machine. tabloid press.-- Including the AP.
Joe B in NOLA
Movielegends [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's Official:
Oscars Are a TV Ratings
-
From: Movielegends
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:45 PM
Subject: [MOPO] Oscars Are a TV Ratings Dud
It's Official:
Oscars Are a TV Ratings Dud
By Associated Press
8:18 AM EST, February 26, 2008
NEW YORK
The Oscars are a ratings dud
AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Oscars Are a TV Ratings Dud
Interesting and not surprising but, to put it in perspective, even if just 30
million people watched it in the US, about 900 million watched it everywhere
else, which is still a helluvan audience. (Not that I thought it was a great
show
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
