Sören Kuklau typed:
> Well then, so there's that "Salon on Mozilla" news post, whose comments
> are at [1]. And then there's that thread in it started by the
> MozillaZine founder himself, Chris Nelson, called "Interesting...". It's
> about how far we've got - in the author's views, of course.
Answer for win98 is also yes. I installed 0.9.9 and the March 14 nightly
both on my Windows partition. You can't run both of them at the same
time as is the case with Linux, but that's not much of a limitation.
You must install each version in a separate folder/directory; otherwise,
files would
I believe that it is not to discriminate, is to be blind.
Is to have the mind closed to only one kind of culture.
/.lancer
"Gervase Markham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Um, this isn't like the US is saying "Ok, Italy you can't have this
"Brian Heinrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Lancer Charade wrote:
> > Hi Dave, look again the page:
> >
> > http://latinmoz.f2g.net/fondos_de_pantalla/Fondos_de_Pantalla.html
> >
> > Dave Roberts wrote:
> >
> >> bla bla bla
> >>
> >> - Dave.
> >>
> >
> >
>
> S
And it came to pass that Brian Heinrich wrote:
> Martin Treu wrote:
>> How do you create a sig file like that?
>>
>> Christopher Jahn wrote:
>>>--
>>>}:-) Christopher Jahn
>>>{:-( Dionysian Reveler
>>>
>>>Yield to temptation; it may not pass your way again.
>>>
>>>To reply: xjahnAT
Martin Treu wrote:
> How do you create a sig file like that?
>
> Christopher Jahn wrote:
>
>>And it came to pass that Ben Bucksch wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Yeh You-Ying wrote:
>>>
>>>
This may be not a bug.
While using forward as inline, the signature is placed in
strang location, or said not
Sören Kuklau wrote:
> On 3/14/2002 2:12 PM, Peter Lairo apparently wrote exactly the following:
>
>> If a person lives in a country that threatens the peace of other
>> countries, then that person either should leave that country or live
>> with the consequences of staying there.
>
>
> And yo
Gervase Markham wrote:
> > If a person lives in a country that threatens the peace of other
>
>> countries, then that person either should leave that country or live
>> with the consequences of staying there.
>
>
> You suppose the leaving is permitted, or even feasible. If the US
> started t
Christian Biesinger wrote:
> Peter Lairo wrote:
>
>> I rather be subject to the restrictions of a democratically elected
>> body than to the anarchy of the internet community running wild
>
>
> I'll take the latter, thanks.
I don't think you know the true consequences of anarchy. ... It only
Clark Morgan wrote:
> I use Mozilla on Windows and have been since about 0.9.4.
>
> I'm terribly impressed.
>
> The only time I used IE now is when I visit a site that refuses Mozilla
> (e.g., http://www.cefs.ubspainewebber.com/ge -- yes I submitted an
> evangelism bug). It's nice to be able to
All this anti american bashing is sooo typical. I'm sure there is "some"
justicfication for it. But I have lived in _Germany as an american *all*
my life and I know that Europe is not that much better. All the wealth
here is concentrated with the former blue bloods ( the Von's, and Zu's)
-the
David Ball wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My wife and I use the Microsoft Optical Trackball. You can find a
> picture in the article at
> http://www.onepc.net/index.php?view=docs&doc_id=92
>
> Besides the regular mouse buttons and wheel, there are two little
> buttons set into the sides. The on
Glenn Miller wrote:
> On 16 Mar 2002, Garth Wallace was seen to have posted this wee note into
> netscape.public.mozilla.general, to which I have responded as follows:
>
>
>>Do any actual professional web designers actually use FrontPage? I
>>thought it was mostly used by the "This is my homep
And it came to pass that Tom B. wrote:
> I know there was a post about this last month and it ended
> with a suggestion to download some software which may be
> bale to set the default mail client in Mozilla
> installations which were "Navigator Only"
>
> I would like to use Mozilla, 0.9.9 in t
This is great news !
Dawn Endico wrote:
> Our normal server ftp.mozilla.org has been having
> difficulty keeping up with the unprecedented
> demand for mozilla 0.9.9. Since its release,
> More than 135,000 copies of mozilla 0.9.9 have been
> downloaded plus over 8500 source tarballs.
>
> The fol
The answer for Linux is yes; I'm running 0.9.8 and 0.9.9 simultaneously
right now - not sure how you would do this in Win98.
Phil
Dom Incollingo wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Does anyone know if it is possible (or will be possible in the near
> future) to have two versions of Mozilla installed on
Clark Morgan wrote:
> I use Mozilla on Windows and have been since about 0.9.4.
>
> I'm terribly impressed.
>
> The only time I used IE now is when I visit a site that refuses Mozilla
> (e.g., http://www.cefs.ubspainewebber.com/ge -- yes I submitted an
> evangelism bug). It's nice to be able to
Hi Everyone,
Does anyone know if it is possible (or will be possible in the near
future) to have two versions of Mozilla installed on the same PC?
I have been using the nightly builds exclusively for quite some time.
But after 1.0 is released, I would like to use Moz 1.0 as my default
browser
jukola wrote:
>
> I'm though not willing to give away detailed information about my
> present computer; type of processor,
What if the bug is specific to your manufacturer/model of processor?
> Mozilla is a software, "talkback" should not
> be concerned about what printer I'm using, only of
> will hard to ignore.
True, but what is AOL's upgrade rate? I understand that AOL5 is
actually still the most-used AOL client...?
This site has never rendered well for me under Mozilla - table cells are
misaligned, push up and down all over the page.
w3.org validator won't even validate it.
We have spent the last 15 years researching home business options available to the public. After spending thousands of hours in research, we can confidently promise you that NO ONE has better information and contacts in this area. $$$ WORK IN THE COMFORT OF YOUR OWN HOME $$$ WIDE SELEC
jukola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mozilla? Mozilla is still a software. Information about what happened to
> Mozilla is enough. My computer name has nothing to do with it.
How are you in a position to say that? I can think of several possible
interesting situations that could be revealed by t
Our normal server ftp.mozilla.org has been having
difficulty keeping up with the unprecedented
demand for mozilla 0.9.9. Since its release,
More than 135,000 copies of mozilla 0.9.9 have been
downloaded plus over 8500 source tarballs.
The folks at AOL/TW have kindly made room to mirror
our releas
Anyone else seeing this? I get this when I start the latest nightly.
XML Parsing Error: undefined entity
Location: chrome://communiator/content/profile/createProfileWizard.xul
Line Number 15, Column 1:
...is that the underlined bright blue sidebar bookmarks look like ass.
(That's a technical term in the GUI design industry, I'm told.)
The rest of 0.9.9 is working better than ever for me. It's just the left
half of my browser window is too bright to look at. (why bright blue?
why underlined?)
Clark Morgan wrote:
> I use Mozilla on Windows and have been since about 0.9.4.
>
> I'm terribly impressed.
>
> The only time I used IE now is when I visit a site that refuses Mozilla
> (e.g., http://www.cefs.ubspainewebber.com/ge -- yes I submitted an
> evangelism bug). It's nice to be able to
I use Mozilla on Windows and have been since about 0.9.4.
I'm terribly impressed.
The only time I used IE now is when I visit a site that refuses Mozilla
(e.g., http://www.cefs.ubspainewebber.com/ge -- yes I submitted an
evangelism bug). It's nice to be able to avoid all of IE's security
proble
Kryptolus wrote:
> jukola wrote:
>
>> Kryptolus wrote:
>>
>>> jukola wrote:
>>>
I responded to a "Sören Kuklau" , not you. I have, most likely,
replied you already.
>>>
>>>
>>> No. You did not reply to me already.
>>> Trolls have a tendency to ignore facts. Is that so?
>>> I
David Illsley wrote:
> Mitchell Baker wrote:
>> Mozilla.org has been investigating the large number
>> of reports problems associated with attempts at downloading the
>> most recent 0.9.9 milestone release.
>>
>> Early investigation points to a large increase in the traffic
>> and demand for this
jukola wrote:
> Kryptolus wrote:
>
>> jukola wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I responded to a "Sören Kuklau" , not you. I have, most likely,
>>> replied you already.
>>>
>>
>>
>> No. You did not reply to me already.
>> Trolls have a tendency to ignore facts. Is that so?
>> I say it again. Read my reply.
>>
>
Kryptolus wrote:
> jukola wrote:
>
>>
>> I responded to a "Sören Kuklau" , not you. I have, most likely,
>> replied you already.
>>
>
>
> No. You did not reply to me already.
> Trolls have a tendency to ignore facts. Is that so?
> I say it again. Read my reply.
>
Once again. Troll accusation
Title: º»¸ÞÀÏÀºÁ¤º¸Åë½Å¸ÁÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø¹×Á¤º¸º¸È£µî¿¡°üÇѹý·üÁ¦50Á¶¿¡ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ[±¤°í]¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í]
¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻ󿡼 ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù ´õ ÀÌ»ó ¸ÞÀÏÀ» ¼ö½
Jim Gabele wrote:
> Is this only in my system, or is it a bug? Can someone try it and let
> me know. This happens in Mozilla 0.9.9. Whenever I right click on an
> image in an e-mail the name of an image is shown properly. However, if
> I try the save image option, instead of the name of the
Graham Todd wrote:
> On Friday 15 March 2002 10:47 pm, jukola wrote:
>
> [snipped]
>
>
>>A printer is *not* a software, nor is a CPU.
>
>
> Whilst that is undoubtedly true, in Windows many printers connect to
> the internet because their drivers are set up to use rpcss.exe in the
> Windows
I noticed your email address on a list serve
related to technology and web development. With your permission, we
would like to send you information regarding new web tools and utilities based
on your interests. Please click the
following link and opt-in to our product updates and e-ne
Bamm Gabriana wrote:
> Rupert James wrote:
>
>> I really miss Grey Modern; it was clean and classy, just like Mozilla
>> itself. > makes it out the door>
>>
>> But skins are small fry compared to what the developers are really
>> doing (and the current Modern is already great). As an end use
Karthik Sheka wrote:
> I just checked. news.mozilla.org news server is getting all the
> messages. I guess I'm abandoning secnews.netscape.com. :-)
news.mozilla.org and secnews.netscape.com are the same server.
jukola wrote:
>
> I responded to a "Sören Kuklau" , not you. I have, most likely, replied
> you already.
>
No. You did not reply to me already.
Trolls have a tendency to ignore facts. Is that so?
I say it again. Read my reply.
On Friday 15 March 2002 10:47 pm, jukola wrote:
[snipped]
> A printer is *not* a software, nor is a CPU.
Whilst that is undoubtedly true, in Windows many printers connect to
the internet because their drivers are set up to use rpcss.exe in the
Windows OS. My Epson printer would not print unl
Do that mean all of the rendering bugs that look like they will make it
into 1.0 are going to be present in AOL+Gecko?
Mozilla still also has extremely bad html form handling. Considering I
spend 90% of my time developing forms of some kind, if that's true I may
as well give up and use Flash f
Bundy wrote:
> Brian Heinrich typed:
>
>> Um, Kyle, lemme ask you this: Can you imagine trying to design a web
>> site if all there were were proprietary tags? The W3C matters. A lot.
>
> Not to a lot of webmasters. What matters is if the page looks good on MS
> Explorer while using Front
Sam Urick wrote:
> Have a question regarding Messaging Server 4.15 and not sure where to
> post. Help with where to post or answer to question would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> Running Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 on Netra X1 server running
> pre-installed Solaris 2.8.
>
> Question:
> How d
Kryptolus wrote:
> jukola wrote:
>
>> Sören Kuklau wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/15/2002 11:47 PM, jukola apparently wrote exactly the following:
>>>
DeMoN LaG wrote:
> Your CPU, speed, and other
> software running can *cause* the crash.
>>>
A printer is *not* a softwa
jukola wrote:
> Sören Kuklau wrote:
>
>> On 3/15/2002 11:47 PM, jukola apparently wrote exactly the following:
>>
>>> DeMoN LaG wrote:
>>>
Your CPU, speed, and other
software running can *cause* the crash.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>> A printer is *not* a software, nor is a CPU.
>>
>>
>>
>> ...and a
I know there was a post about this last month and it ended with a
suggestion to download some software which may be bale to set the default
mail client in Mozilla installations which were "Navigator Only"
I would like to use Mozilla, 0.9.9 in this case, for web browsing but Kmail
for e-mail.
Christian Biesinger wrote:
> Geraint Edwards wrote:
>
>> Why not differentiate between controlling image downloads in webpages
>> and in emails, via the privacy & security preferences?
>
> On the wishlist, won't be in 1.0 though.
Are you sure? It's marked mozilla1.0+...
Geraint Edwards wrote:
> dman84 wrote:
>
>>> 1. Spam avoidance.
>>
>>
>> Javascript stuff is turned off by default in mail & news.. sounds like
>> quite a project..
>
>
> What I am talking about is not javascript it is html email that includes
> lines to the effect :
>
>
>
> As soon as th
And it came to pass that Martin Treu wrote:
> Christopher Jahn wrote:
>>
>> And it came to pass that Ben Bucksch wrote:
>>
>> > Which "strange" location exactly is it placed in?
>> >
>> >
>>
>> According to the bug report, it's ABOVE the message.
>> That's definitely a problem.
>>
> How do yo
RV wrote:
> It would be great to get a list of sites, lets say top 50 of them. I can
> post the list on the AOL+gecko beta Discussion group requesting other
> beta testers to visit them and complain about their lack of AOL+gecko
> compliance (that of course will help Mozilla/Netscape 6.x, Galeo
Sören Kuklau wrote:
> On 3/15/2002 11:47 PM, jukola apparently wrote exactly the following:
>
>> DeMoN LaG wrote:
>>
>>> Your CPU, speed, and other
>>> software running can *cause* the crash.
>>
>
>> A printer is *not* a software, nor is a CPU.
>
>
> ...and a jukola seems to be a troll.
>
E
Mitchell Baker wrote:
>
> Mozilla.org has been investigating the large number
> of reports problems associated with attempts at downloading the
> most recent 0.9.9 milestone release.
>
> Early investigation points to a large increase in the traffic
> and demand for this release. To date it appea
and the 0.9.9 isn't as good as the nightly/latest at Mrch 1st was (also
it is said thgat 0.9.9 was build from this or did i get something wrong?)
what da hell is going on?
erem http://www.chip.de displays wrong this this 0.9.9 release, do not
ask me who is guilty...
javascript is da problem i
Patch Maker 2.0pre2 has been released; get it from:
http://www.gerv.net/software/patch-maker/
Patch Maker is a Perl script for managing patches. It has two separate
but related functions - it can work in one of two modes.
In Build mode, which is Mozilla-specific, you can make patches to
Mozill
On 3/15/2002 11:47 PM, jukola apparently wrote exactly the following:
> DeMoN LaG wrote:
>> Your CPU, speed, and other
>> software running can *cause* the crash.
> A printer is *not* a software, nor is a CPU.
...and a jukola seems to be a troll.
--
Regards,
Sören Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PRO
jukola wrote:
>
>
>
> No, I'm a user. I still don't understand why Mozilla need the name of my
> computer, the brand of my printer etc. to file a "talkback".
>
> Your CPU, speed, and other
>
>> software running can *cause* the crash.
>
>
> A printer is *not* a software, nor is a CPU.
>
Hey folks,
Does anyone know if it's possible to access a local HTML or XUL file as
a sidebar tab? It's a question that's been asked before, but I've never
found a satisfactory answer.
Adding this to panels.rdf doesn't seem to do it:
I just get the "This tab id not available right now" m
DeMoN LaG wrote:
> jukola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 15 Mar 2002:
>
>
>>I'm though not willing to give away detailed information about my
>>present computer; type of processor, speed, the software I'm
>>using, what printer I have etc. and so on
DeMoN LaG wrote:
> Heh, what will Mozilla's market share look like with the additition of
> 30 million AOL members? Significantly higher than 1.0%, I think
Last year AOL was the top company in terms of e-commerce, either
directly or indirectly (routing its users to othe e-commerce site (I
re
On 03/15/2002 05:39 PM, jukola wrote:
> "Quality Feedback Agent"? For whom? Mozilla? Not for me.
Fine. Just use mozilla-win32.zip.
My personal gripe is that mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz does not come
with Talkback. I do agree though that machine name is irrelevant to
Mozilla and shouldn't
Pratik wrote:
> On 03/15/2002 05:02 PM, jukola wrote:
>
>
>> Where do I find the non-talkback-installers?
>
>
> For nightlies,if you go to
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/
>
> mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu-installer.tar.gz - talkback selectable at
> install time
> mozilla-i68
jukola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 15 Mar 2002:
> I'm though not willing to give away detailed information about my
> present computer; type of processor, speed, the software I'm
> using, what printer I have etc. and so on. This has nothing to do
>
RV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 15 Mar 2002:
> Someone will have to start eating his own words soon ;-) Long
> live the Politburo at Maozilla (no pun intended)
>
Heh, what will Mozilla's market share look like with the additition of
30 million A
Sören Kuklau wrote:
> On 3/15/2002 10:56 PM, jukola apparently wrote exactly the following:
>
>> The "drawback" doesn't only send information that is necessary to send
>> about the crash itself.
>
>
> It does.
No, it doesn't. What possible information about a crash of Moz is
concealed in the
It would be great to get a list of sites, lets say top 50 of them. I can
post the list on the AOL+gecko beta Discussion group requesting other
beta testers to visit them and complain about their lack of AOL+gecko
compliance (that of course will help Mozilla/Netscape 6.x, Galeon, etc.)
A link t
On 03/15/2002 05:02 PM, jukola wrote:
> Where do I find the non-talkback-installers?
For nightlies,if you go to ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/
mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu-installer.tar.gz - talkback selectable at
install time
mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu-sea.tar.gz - talkback sel
JTK wrote:
> Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
>
>> JTK wrote:
>>
>>> Huh. I wonder if this has any possible connection to the sudden
>>> increase in the number of showstoppers that have been getting fixed
>>> recently. Oh, what am I saying! AOL is not in any way related to
>>> Mozila!
Someone will
Sören Kuklau wrote:
> Are you sure the Gecko version will be actually *released* as final
> product? As far as I know, it's just a beta test build built on AOL 7.0
> and an embedded Gecko - but the actual Gecko-powered AOL will be 8.0.
Who cares how they call it? Will it make a diference if th
Tim Wunder wrote:
> jukola wrote:
>
>> Patrick Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>> jukola wrote:
>>>
Christian Biesinger wrote:
> ado beith wrote:
>
>> I just downloaded mozilla 0.9.9 and installed it. But it crashes as
>> soon as I load the browser up
>
>
>
>
>
On 3/15/2002 10:56 PM, jukola apparently wrote exactly the following:
> The "drawback" doesn't only send information that is necessary to send
> about the crash itself.
It does.
> It send also information about the printer I'm
> using. Why? A software, which is used to browse the internet, sho
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
> jukola wrote:
>
>> Patrick Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>> jukola wrote:
>>>
Christian Biesinger wrote:
> ado beith wrote:
>
>> I just downloaded mozilla 0.9.9 and installed it. But it crashes as
>> soon as I load the browser up
>
>
>
>
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
> JTK wrote:
>
>> Huh. I wonder if this has any possible connection to the sudden
>> increase in the number of showstoppers that have been getting fixed
>> recently. Oh, what am I saying! AOL is not in any way related to
>> Mozila!
>
>
> AOL is testing *Gecko* -- no
I am not paranoid about personal info, but the one time I looked through
the Talkback information, it had stuff like the name of the computer and
the user name which for the life of me I couldn't understand why it
needed it or how those values affected Mozilla so I can see jukola's
point thoug
Mozilla mail test.
jukola wrote:
> Patrick Gallagher wrote:
>
>> jukola wrote:
>>
>>> Christian Biesinger wrote:
>>>
ado beith wrote:
> I just downloaded mozilla 0.9.9 and installed it. But it crashes as
> soon as I load the browser up
Did you get a "Talkback Window",
jukola wrote:
> Patrick Gallagher wrote:
>
>> jukola wrote:
>>
>>> Christian Biesinger wrote:
>>>
ado beith wrote:
> I just downloaded mozilla 0.9.9 and installed it. But it crashes as
> soon as I load the browser up
Did you get a "Talkback Window",
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
> jukola wrote:
>
>> Christian Biesinger wrote:
>>
>>> ado beith wrote:
>>>
I just downloaded mozilla 0.9.9 and installed it. But it crashes as
soon as I load the browser up
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Did you get a "Talkback Window", asking you to send in crash
>>> in
A few more comments to add to my post elsewhere in this thread. Again,
the standard disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, this is not legal advice or
an official mozilla.org statement.
Gervase Markham wrote:
>> If Mozilla is a international free software project supported by
>> developers of many coun
jukola wrote:
> Christian Biesinger wrote:
>
>> ado beith wrote:
>>
>>> I just downloaded mozilla 0.9.9 and installed it. But it crashes as
>>> soon as I load the browser up
>>
>>
>>
>> Did you get a "Talkback Window", asking you to send in crash
>> information?
>
>
> Why would anyone send in "T
Christian Biesinger wrote:
> ado beith wrote:
>
>> I just downloaded mozilla 0.9.9 and installed it. But it crashes as
>> soon as I load the browser up
>
>
> Did you get a "Talkback Window", asking you to send in crash information?
Why would anyone send in "Talkback Information"?
This "talkba
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, JTK wrote:
> Huh. I wonder if this has any possible connection to the sudden
> increase in the number of showstoppers that have been getting fixed
> recently. Oh, what am I saying! AOL is not in any way related to Mozila!
>
The fire marshal just called for yo
Geraint Edwards wrote:
> Why not differentiate between controlling image downloads in webpages
> and in emails, via the privacy & security preferences?
On the wishlist, won't be in 1.0 though.
> 2. Delete without viewing.
> How about changing the right click on a message so that you get the
>
ado beith wrote:
> I just downloaded mozilla 0.9.9 and installed it. But it crashes as
> soon as I load the browser up
Did you get a "Talkback Window", asking you to send in crash information?
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty
JTK wrote:
> Huh. I wonder if this has any possible connection to the sudden
> increase in the number of showstoppers that have been getting fixed
> recently. Oh, what am I saying! AOL is not in any way related to Mozila!
AOL is testing *Gecko* -- not Mozilla. Gecko is Mozilla's rendering
e
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Well, it would help if some of you would read the regulations
Indeed. This seems to be the post that best addresses the actual reality
of US encryption export control, so I thought it was appropriate to add
my own comments to it.
IMPORTANT: Note that I am not a la
How do you create a sig file like that?
Christopher Jahn wrote:
>
> And it came to pass that Ben Bucksch wrote:
>
> > Yeh You-Ying wrote:
> >
> >>This may be not a bug.
> >>While using forward as inline, the signature is placed in
> >>strang location, or said not a proper location in a message.
Lancer wrote:
> http://latinmoz.f2g.net/fondos_de_pantalla/Fondos_de_Pantalla.html
Not Found
The requested URL /fondos_de_pantalla/Fondos_de_Pantalla.html was not
found on this server.
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor s
I believe this problem primarily occurs when doing a "forward" of
a message.
The tedious work-around appears to be to type a little text into
the one field available - the main body of the message. Then, click
to quit the window. When prompted whether you want to save/don't save/cancel
choose ca
Mozilla.org has been investigating the large number
of reports problems associated with attempts at downloading the
most recent 0.9.9 milestone release.
Early investigation points to a large increase in the traffic
and demand for this release. To date it appears that
approximately 135,000 downloa
Sören Kuklau wrote:
> On 3/14/2002 10:31 PM, Chris Nelson apparently wrote exactly the following:
>
>> My oh my. The shame of it!
>>
> > > [..]
>
>>
>> Do you promise? Cross your heart?
>
>
> Didn't anybody at school tell you how to argue in any good way?
>
Nope. I learned everything about
Does anyone know if there is a Netscape6/Mozilla equivalent to the PC
registry setting
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Netscape\Netscape Navigator\Automation
Startup?
If you put stuff in here, Nepscape (before 6) would autonaticall load it for
you.
On 3/15/2002 6:42 PM, Stuart Ballard apparently wrote exactly the following:
> RV wrote:
>
>>*"Hello Beta Testers!
>>The Beta Team is happy to announce the start of a new Beta test -- AOL
>>7.0 with Netscape Gecko.
>
>
> Any other software company would call it 7.1... that's going to be hell
>
RV wrote:
>
> *"Hello Beta Testers!
> The Beta Team is happy to announce the start of a new Beta test -- AOL
> 7.0 with Netscape Gecko.
Any other software company would call it 7.1... that's going to be hell
for site admins when they ask AOLers what version they're using... is an
AOL user really
Title: ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä.
3¿ù ÇÑ´ÞÁß
www.e-phonecard.co.kr »çÀÌÆ®¿¡¼ ±¸ÀÔ/ÃæÀü ÇϽÅ
°í°´´Ô Áß Ãß÷À» ÅëÇØ
As Dennis said above, the right-click delete without viewing for a
single message appears to work in 2002031408 - phil
Geraint Edwards wrote:
> I know its late in the day for feature suggestions. with Mozilla 1.0
> just around the corner. but the following are based on my experiences.
>
> Here
Sören Kuklau wrote:
> On 3/14/2002 9:21 PM, Ben Bucksch apparently wrote exactly the following:
>
>> Sören Kuklau wrote:
>>
>>> Mr. M.P. Thomas replies to it with an opposite opinion, called
>>> "Better than MSIE? In a few more years, maybe" [2]. I don't certainly
>>> agree with his post, but h
Daniel Veditz wrote:
> Matthew Thomas wrote:
>
>>While Mozilla may be the ISP's default browser, they can't afford to lock out
>>the fraction of customers who prefer browsers which don't support XUL,
>
>
> I find it hard to believe Hans's customers prefer a XUL-less browser or even
> know what
EPPack wrote:
> Oh I'm sorry!! I wasn't aware of that! My apologies to the group! I will try
> to locate the proper ng.
That would be news://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator>. :-)
/Jonas
Jay Garcia wrote:
> The actual numbers can be skewed a bit by the users that can't get in
> with Communicator will try IE of course.
That really depends. Imagine yourself searching for information using a
search engine, with 100+ hits. One site doesn't work for you with Mozilla.
Will you try IE?
Oh I'm sorry!! I wasn't aware of that! My apologies to the group! I will try
to locate the proper ng.
elaine
"Bamm Gabriana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
a6t6j8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:a6t6j8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Unfortunately, this is not a newsgroup for Netscape Communicator.
>
> It
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
