On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 22:28:41 +0200, derGraph wrote:
Don Redman wrote:
OK, whoever wants to implement this, should issue a RFV and get going.
It's not like I could implement this, but ... however ...
He who is in doubt that parody should be an attribute of the
cover AR shall veto now
Don Redman wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 22:28:41 +0200, derGraph wrote:
And now, wait 48 hours? I bet that's enough time for me to forget
about this thread. ;-)
That's a serious problem. Anyone has an idea how this could be avoided?
And it's a general problem of MB. Problems are either
On 25/04/06, Simon Reinhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one of the secretaries goes to add a ticket to the style issues section on
trac and either sets the owner to her-/himself or to CC.
off topic, but how exactly does the CC stuff in trac work? I've never
been sent an email when my tickets are
thanks shepard, that worked! well, maybe i didn't put my email in
first time round somehow :) in any case i think i'm sorted, thanks.
On 25/04/06, Chris Bransden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/04/06, Simon Reinhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one of the secretaries goes to add a ticket to the
I don't think you should put in a lifespan for artist
[anon.]. Does Seikilos have any known compositions?
If not then there isn't much need to make him an
artist.
I think both a name and composition would be needed
for a performance under that artist to exist.
-Nate
--- Adam Golding [EMAIL
Will submit there. Ty,
-Nate
--- Luká Lalinský [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Noble wrote:
If this is the wrong place for this, feel free to
kick
me in the right direction...
I think is more a technical server issue, so
http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/newticket
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 10:49:39PM +0200, derGraph wrote:
I wonder where to draw the line. We should definitely not include all
subnational states, but only for larger states. But should it be limited
to USA and Canada? What about e.g. Russia and China?
There is no line and I'm not drawing
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 15:55, Don Redman wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:55:57 +0200, derGraph wrote:
I guess we're back on the RFC phase, then?
I have not followed the whole thread, but I guess not.
Noone has issued a veto and that is what counts. This is the whole point
of the RFV
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 04:31:57PM -0500, Orion wrote:
In large part it's from the bootlegs being of English artists performing
in countries that aren't predominantly English.
Agreed there.
Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan feels odd for some reason
It sounds fine to me in English, but I don't know
Adam Golding wrote:
i was discussing this in one of the classical threads--i repaste my
suggestion here:
I must say, I'm a bit confused by your proposal and don't understand all of it,
probably because it's very classical-related.
Again I'm pointing to the plans for the NextGenerationSchema
testy testy test!
~ mo the tester
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Hey,
so to sum it up:
Bogdan said {live} and {acoustic} make not much sense in the relationship since
they should be track attributes and I agree.
Then I just found an album-album AR type live performance by chance (created because of
http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/980) which is not yet
Simon Reinhardt wrote:
We need more secretaries who are willing to do some work. When a new
problem arises on the style mailing list, one of the secretaries goes
to add a ticket to the style issues section on trac and either sets
the owner to her-/himself or to CC. Then they are responsible
dj empirical wrote:
i think that with bootlegs, what the artist does often has no bearing
on anything! :)
Eh ... of course not!
But that's not the point! However, an artist performing in Italian
exclusively will most likely have most fans in Italy, and almost all
fans would rather like to
It seems like my post got lost somewhere, so I send it again. Please
excuse if it arrives twice.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Satire vs. Parody ... Re: [mb-style] new relationship
type parody
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:28:34 +0200
From: derGraph [EMAIL
Chris Bransden wrote:
good point. i would say make co an attribute, and executive a
sub-type, as producers/co-producers is a similar hands-on role, but
executive producers can mean a more external influence.
But isn't executive pretty much like the guest attribute on
performed-ARs?
derGraph
seikilos isn't the composer--he's just the dude whose tombstone the song was carved intoand it was a bad example though--i'm thinking that there might be anonymous composers before 800 who have multiple works..
On 4/25/06, Nathan Noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think you should put in a
On 25/04/06, Nikki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would definitely prefer the local name, not only because this is the
official name, and we prefer official data almost everywhere. We might
still add the English name in an annotation.
Yet we use the English name of the country. I think we
Chris Bransden wrote:
nope, see http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ProducerRelationshipType
producers aren't ever credited as guests,
I was talking about how influential the position is ...
derGraph
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
what are you talking about then? :P
On 25/04/06, derGraph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Bransden wrote:
nope, see http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ProducerRelationshipType
producers aren't ever credited as guests,
I was talking about how influential the position is ...
derGraph
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:46:23PM +0100, Chris Bransden wrote:
IMO it should be at the moderators discretion. it's what's useful to
the users that is most important. since it's a free-text field
(album/track title), there's no reason to unify the data. If a french
user adds french language
On 25/04/06, Nikki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:46:23PM +0100, Chris Bransden wrote:
IMO it should be at the moderators discretion. it's what's useful to
the users that is most important. since it's a free-text field
(album/track title), there's no reason to unify the
Bogdan Butnaru wrote:
On 4/25/06, Simon Reinhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- change Release is a live performance of Release, Release was performed live
as Release to Release has later recording(s) Release, Release is a later
recording
of Release and update the one case using the live stuff
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:16:55 +0200, derGraph wrote:
Simon Reinhardt wrote:
We need more secretaries who are willing to do some work. When a new
problem arises on the style mailing list, one of the secretaries goes
to add a ticket to the style issues section on trac and either sets the
Bogdan Butnaru wrote:
That being said, I think we should insist on using a single language
everywhere (English seems the best choice), because when we make the
database smarter (and perhaps the location and date of bootlegs will
be a field) it'll be much easier to make an automatic conversion.
On 4/26/06, Simon Reinhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing we need is that someone *really* cares about a problem and
controls discussions. And well, if noone like that is found for an issue then
the style secretary can ask someone to do the work or try to do it themselves
as a
On 4/26/06, Simon Reinhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some explanation for the image you attached? I do not understand it. :)
I don't get it either. I think the width of the grey band indicates
the number of emails per time unit sent on the subject.
But images are usually only a way to enhance
Adam Golding wrote:
On 4/23/06, derGraph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikki wrote:
Should UK countries be included?
I wonder where to draw the line. We should definitely not
include all subnational states, but only for larger states.
But should it be limited to USA and Canada? What
dj empirical wrote:
i think that with bootlegs, what the artist does often has
no bearing
on anything! :)
Eh ... of course not!
But that's not the point! However, an artist performing in
Italian exclusively will most likely have most fans in Italy,
and almost all fans would
29 matches
Mail list logo
