Re: [mb-style] RFC: new AR type was digital engineered by

the difference: what Ernst Horn does on stage is generating sounds with several synthesisers, old-fashioned computers and even tape recorders. So in MB terminology, he is live audio engineering.) -- derGraph [1] http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/EngineerRelationshipType

Re: [mb-style] RFC: New Artist Type: Project

the libraries and other services anyway. :-S -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] Net Releases

you can - amazon.com and so forth do worldwide delivery. Yes, and worldwide delivery is another way of saying get someone to send that to me. I'm glad you're both of the same opinion. ;-) -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz

Re: [mb-style] (album version)

be lost. This information might no longer be on MB, but hey can easily be found. Just think about how many fan pages or cover scans, used to prove an edit, you've seen during the last month. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz

Re: [mb-style] (album version)

Cristov Russell wrote: since the release type isn't tagged. Just as a side note: it is! There just are no players etc. that use these tags. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http

[mb-style] RFV: RenamedRelationshipType

, unless we decide against it. ;-) -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Latin guidelines (second request)

there had not been any other opinions. The wiki page however does not mention this yet. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] RFC: new renamed to AR type

. Back to RFC and let there be a newly rephrased proposal. I had already dropped back to RFC, and I thought the subject line would reflect this. ;-) -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http

Re: [mb-style] RFV: SortNameStyle

. As they are right now, they surely are not easy to understand, so I'd rather see them re-ordered. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] RFC: new renamed to AR type

derGraph wrote: Simon Reinhardt wrote: I must admit it was a bit hot when I wrote that and after it I thought: hmmm.. that's all bullshit. I think you're right, one general type probably won't work. I have a real life example for you: I just thought about other real-life examples when I had

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Dealing with translations and transliterations

) are tricky to handle. If it works for the majority of cases, or maybe even for all but very few, I'd say we should go ahead! -- derGraph PS: Thanks for the summary! ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http

Re: [mb-style] RFV: new AR type is the predecessor of

this determined by the MemberOfBandRelationshipType only? And if we do, where's the line to draw? BTW, in my opinion this is too much debate not to drop back to RFC. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org

Re: [mb-style] Tracking RFCs and RFVs

would be able to save a search for the key phrases into a virtual folder (AFAIK several mail clients already offer this feature). This could at least help keeping an eye on the time passed, but I'd favour to have this additionally to everything else. -- derGraph

Re: [mb-style] RFV: new AR type is the predecessor of

to hinder the progress of this. That's all right! Your post shows that we need to define the guidelines in all details before adding the AR. And now finally the discussion has become really productive. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list

Re: [mb-style] Tracking RFCs and RFVs

idea, and it would surely be of help, but I think we should welcome any aid we can get. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

[mb-style] RFV: new AR type is the predecessor of

), these restrictions have to be enforced by guidelines and voting only. Whoever sees a problem arise in this change shall veto it now. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org

Re: [mb-style] RFV: new AR type is the predecessor of

mean that B's style is influenced by A. Right? We had also discussed the wording evolved into and evolved from. If you think this wording is a problem, then you should veto now. But in this case, I'll send another RFV for the alternate wording. -- derGraph

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Latin style guidelines

dead sure!, then I'm completely satisfied and even support it. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] Decision and clarification of imdb format

there. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Latin style guidelines

to be what is printed on most covers, we should also use Sentence Case. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

[mb-style] English Capitalization (was: missing accents on Jarre's songs)

on the cover, but The Hunt for Red October on the inside. -- derGraph [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalization#Headings_and_publication_titles ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org

Re: [mb-style] RFC: new AR type is the predecessor of

the sequence in which the names were used. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] RFC: new AR type is the predecessor of

Simon Reinhardt wrote: derGraph wrote: Of course! With artists, albums and tracks as nodes and ARs as vertices, the data we already have make an immensely large directed graph, and people like Shepard spend much time to expand it. With that directed graph you could for example determine

Re: [mb-style] Release imports

Schika wrote: I wouldn't trust the info given from the Amazon shops. I've founded so much crap they entered in their system. True. I usually only use the release dates at Amazon to back up information found somewhere else. -- derGraph

Re: [mb-style] ArtistAlias and PerformanceNameStyle conflict / Whatmakes an Alias?

these examples cry for a new AR. Something like [group1] was renamed to [group2] , or maybe was known as ... after or is the predecessor of. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Latin style guidelines

for that reason, though.) Second, and more grave, a Google search for De Bello Gallico [1] shows that the proposed capitalization is almost exclusively used on Italian sites, and the majority uses the capitalization I proposed here. -- derGraph [1] http://www.google.com/search?hl=ennum=100q

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Latin style guidelines

in Latin was introduced by the Roman Catholic Church it might have been influenced by other cultures, like the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation. These influences might even have started in the time of the Roman Empire, when the empire had its greatest expand. -- derGraph

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Latin style guidelines

-folk, folk-rock, (neo-)medieval music and the like. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Latin style guidelines

Bogdan Butnaru wrote: On 5/29/06, derGraph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On the other proposed style, I'm pretty sure a list of Latin prepositions, numerals, conjunctions, et cetera could be created. It might even be short enough to create a Guess Case mode. Certainly, we could list all closed

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Latin style guidelines

releases / valid official sources. In this case we should consistently use the capitalization rule which is the easiest to use. This reflects the fact that there is no single official capitalization rule for Latin. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz

[mb-style] RFC: new AR type is the predecessor of

Don Redman wrote: derGraph wrote: joan WHITTAKER wrote: [...] T Rex, who evolved out of the remains of the original Tyrannosaurus Rex. Jefferson Airplane was formed in 1965 [...] and the band changed it's musical direction re-naming itself Jefferson Starship. [...] and the band

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Latin style guidelines

Don Redman wrote: Just for completeness of the summary, derGraph proposes to use 4, because it is more commonly used on the internet, [...] It's hard to show common usage in the real world, as I don't know the URI schema for real world links. ;-) However, I've seen both sentence

Re: [mb-style] RFC: new AR type is the predecessor of

,, and is a predecessor of doesn't make much more sense. If not then what does it mean for persons? Legal name changes? I prefer handling this with a separate AR type. I agree. Feel free to start a new thread. ;-) -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list

Re: [mb-style] Latin guidelines RFC

Bogdan Butnaru wrote: Returning to the Latin guidelines: can your friend give us any reference for those rules, perhaps something I can cite in the wiki? No. It seems like it was an unwritten rule. Or as that friend of mine said: it was usus, not lex. Sorry. -- derGraph

Re: [mb-style] Latin guidelines RFC

. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

[mb-style] Release imports

a release was first made available through an import service an ReleaseEvent? Should it be added to the release dates? -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [mb-style] Release imports

of. The problem is that the release was imported. However, the page suggest it's an official import. See http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0I2VK for details, especially the 'label' section. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list

Re: [mb-style] song / [untitled] vs. non-album tracks

. -- derGraph [1] http://musicbrainz.org/album/824258e9-8ab2-446e-a696-d562b5717c2d.html ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] Mutiple-disc Album Titles Utilizing Disc Number tags

there are more important changes on MB to be coded. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] song / [untitled] vs. non-album tracks

silence and then by Funny Little Song, the correct track title would be Some Long Song / Funny Little Song. Correct? -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [mb-style] x (disc 1) x (disc 2), vs x x (bonus disc) / version info for special releases

is for? -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] x (disc 1) x (disc 2), vs x x (bonus disc) / version info for special releases

is already covered by the SG. We usually don't add any album version info at all. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] albums and single with the same title

it. Not a real solution anyway, because amaroK will still treat all the songs as one album. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] x (disc 1) x (disc 2), vs x x (bonus disc) / version info for special releases

and there is no single disc release with only disc 1, therefore no disc can be considered bonus, so in both cases I'd prefer (disc #). Only my opinion, anyway. -- derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http

Re: [mb-style] Co-ProducerRelationshipType

about impossible combinations as well, since the voting system and voting practices usually help finding such faulty moderations even before they're applied. Also it should be fairly simple to query for such a combination. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz

Re: [mb-style] Style Secretary Buffer Overflow

to do ... derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] language of descriptions for untitled tracks

think it makes a good rule-of-thump. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] ideas on improving Style Council decissions

Don Redman wrote: On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:04:44 +0200, derGraph wrote: The problem with such a graph is that quite often the subject of the discussion changes, but the subject lines of the posts don't. Therefore, this might be nice to look at, but not to be relied on. Hmm, yes you would have

Re: [mb-style] ideas on improving Style Council decissions

type / attribute / wording discussions. This whole algorithm is biased on issues that need testing, so some people will be misguided to think the test phase is required. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] Co-ProducerRelationshipType

album or track or artist co-executive co-produced album or track. I might be wrong, but it should be possible to solve this problem using artist {coex:co-}executive {copro:co-}produced album or track derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list

Re: [mb-style] Co-ProducerRelationshipType

what work a person in the studio did? Not sure about in music terminology, but they're not equal in movies and theater though. Can you please tell us the difference, then? derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] Co-ProducerRelationshipType

is valid, or if it can be replaced with {executive:executive }. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] ideas on improving Style Council decissions

with PHP. :-P But that's not MB-style, but MB-devel related.) derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] Bootleg locations

to see Italian than English script on the cover. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: Satire vs. Parody ... Re: [mb-style] new relationship type parody

It seems like my post got lost somewhere, so I send it again. Please excuse if it arrives twice. Original Message Subject: Re: Satire vs. Parody ... Re: [mb-style] new relationship type parody Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:28:34 +0200 From: derGraph [EMAIL

Re: [mb-style] Co-ProducerRelationshipType

Chris Bransden wrote: good point. i would say make co an attribute, and executive a sub-type, as producers/co-producers is a similar hands-on role, but executive producers can mean a more external influence. But isn't executive pretty much like the guest attribute on performed-ARs? derGraph

Re: [mb-style] Co-ProducerRelationshipType

Chris Bransden wrote: nope, see http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ProducerRelationshipType producers aren't ever credited as guests, I was talking about how influential the position is ... derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] new relationship type parody

as a parody of another song. Does this rough summary of this discussion satisfyingly answer your question? Again: Veto? derGraph [1] http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/CoverRelationshipType ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style

Re: Satire vs. Parody ... Re: [mb-style] new relationship type parody

, we might also change the wording to parody/satire. I guess we're back on the RFC phase, then? derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] new relationship type parody

that's enough time for me to forget about this thread. ;-) derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Instrumental Style

no way to avoid all possible loss of data. The developers are doing their best to create new means to store such data, but we simply cannot keep every bit of data. Get along with that. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] proper capitalization in AR types

* has amazon asin - has Amazon ASIN I wonder how many people ever noticed this is a case of the RAS syndrome[1]. But then again, who would know what an ASIN is if it said nothing about Amazon? derGraph [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAS_syndrome

Re: [mb-style] Bootleg locations

? This seems like an artefact of a long-gone time when the artist names were latinized ... derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Instrumental Style

when it was printed on the cover. So even if we should ever agree to include (album version) on singles if it is printed on the cover, we have already lost data, and most likely will for some time until each moderator knows about the new rule. derGraph

[mb-style] ArtistIntent

a guideline to what we should treat as ArtistIntent. For example, odd case or obscure spelling should (almost) always be treated as ArtistIntent. Any ideas? derGraph [1] http://musicbrainz.org/showmod.html?modid=4643690 ___ Musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] new relationship type parody

Don Redman wrote: I think I could issue a request for veto now, but want to clarify first whether (a) this should be just for the parody attribute, or (b) for medley, too. This seems to be a silent agreement for (a). derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] Clarification of instrumental track info

be aware that such a change will result in much work for all of us, since we have to add data we previously did not store. derGraph [1] http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ExtraTitleInformationStyle ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] Clarification of instrumental track info

(instrumental) on the cover. Therefore, just like (live), this extra information should be omitted, unless another non-instrumental version exists. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http

Re: [mb-style] background vocal - backing vocal

It might be my poor understanding of the British tongue, but form my point of view there might be a slight difference between backing and background. I'm pretty sure you can take a backing part without being pushed into the background. derGraph

Re: [mb-style] Video on data tracks vs. DVD-Video vs. VCD vs. SACD vs. DVD-Audio

Lukáš Lalinský wrote: derGraph wrote: IMO, it is. The data tracks in most cases actually are not extra tracks, but extra sessions. This is what I don't like. In case of DVDs we are talking about track listings printed on the cover. In case of CDs it's about tracksessions. You

Re: [mb-style] Evil overlord speaks on DVDs (was: WTF DVD?)

the appropriate album attribute, we can easily find all the video entries and change their titles and attributes. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz

Re: [mb-style] Evil overlord speaks on DVDs (was: WTF DVD?)

unreadable quickly. Just one moderator's opinion, and the last thing I'll say on this topic. If this is your final decision, I'll swallow it. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org

Re: [mb-style] new relationship type parody

some more oppinions _on_this_aspect_ please? I would leave medley as it is, because a cover necessarily is on music by another artist, while a medley not necessarily is. A cover and a medley might be related close enough to group them together, but in my opinion they are not equal. derGraph

Re: [mb-style] new relationship type parody

a cover. So to avoid confusion, I'd leave this out. In the essence, I agree that we might as well add this as an attribute to the cover AR, like is a {parody} cover of, is {parody} covered on. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz

Re: [mb-style] WTF DVD? (was: Veto - DVD in album titles)

be glad to know). derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] WTF DVD? (was: Veto - DVD in album titles)

we should be penalising users who just want to use the most basic and obvious information about DVD releases. Then why don't you use some kind of wiki? Perhaps a per-artist wiki page on DVD releases? It might as well contain all the desired title information. derGraph [1] http

Re: [mb-style] WTF DVD? (was: Veto - DVD in album titles)

Though he could see the soundwaves on the screen, now that I think about it... ... or could plug the speaker cables into the graphics card output, risking severe damage to the hardware. :-P But it would surely make some noise, if only for a short time. derGraph

Re: [mb-style] WTF DVD? (was: Veto - DVD in album titles)

on countless moderations. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] WTF DVD? (was: Veto - DVD in album titles)

like media) with the audio ripped of the DVD, it is bootleg. derGraph [1] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2006-February/001609.html [2] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2006-February/001611.html [3] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail

Re: [mb-style] WTF DVD? (was: Veto - DVD in album titles)

and vice versa. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

[mb-style] new relationship type parody

on [track] Any thoughts, objections, flamings, ...? derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] WTF DVD? (was: Veto - DVD in album titles)

there are also camera angles, but we don't discuss MovieBrainz here.) derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] LiveTrackStyle

to replace / append / leave the comment fields ('append' might be impossible to implement, though), since some users might want to leave their comment tags as they are. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] Europe vs EU vs STFU

such a good economy that distributing there would make much sense for most labels. Second, the fuzzy definition of Europe will tempt even more inexperienced or lazy moderators to select Europe instead of searching for the correct release country. Just my opinion, anyway. derGraph [1] http

Re: [mb-style] Europe vs EU vs STFU

. Not EU. (Not only) since we're still talking about release countries, I would prefer EU. But before another discussion leads us to another delay, I'd better add that Europe is better than nothing, and as you said we can still improve this one in the future. derGraph

Re: [mb-style] request for new release country: GDR

-arguments on this issue at each others head, and before we're finished the EU has become a fully-qualified country with a semi-democratically elected head of state. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http

Re: [mb-style] Japanese titles

well. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

[mb-style] request for new release country: GDR

a problem with socialist releases? ;-) derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] Japanese titles

キラーパルス 1. OUR PASTRAL 2. J madd 9 3. Greed Meaning 4. ミルクカート 5. スノウライン 6. この気持ち 7. フィール　ザ　パルス 8. G to P 9. サイケデリックパスワード 10. BEACH Forgive me my lack of education and my ignorance, but I don't understand your example at all. When do you write in what case?

Re: [mb-style] request: cover of album-album relationship

just push bureaucracy aside here? I simply cannot imagine there is any sensible reason for not adding such an AR type. derGraph ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [mb-style] Live DVDs

Orion wrote: derGraph wrote: Is it legal to rip the music off a DVD-Video? Err, is that relevant? If your argumentation builds on ripping audio streams from DVD-Video releases: YES! ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style