Charles Jie wrote:
> I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his
> programs.
But please: Don't snip *everything*! Just reading the answer or comment
(to an unknown question, because I deleted the original posting in the
meantime) ist more painful than ignoring superfluou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 10-01-02 at 08:11
* Cristian said
> This is just wrong. Setting the mime type to text/plain instead of
> application/pgp is the very purpose of the ``PGP Outlook compatibility
> patch'' (which I call ``PGP compatibility patch'').
>
> What
> what common editors (if any) support format=flowed? i'd be interested in
> setting 'text_flowed', but i'm betting vim doesn't do this correctly by
> default.
>
> anyone have a vim configuration that will do this?
Are you just looking for a way to have vim break lines at some
particular page wi
what common editors (if any) support format=flowed? i'd be interested in
setting 'text_flowed', but i'm betting vim doesn't do this correctly by
default.
anyone have a vim configuration that will do this?
w
On Tue, 08 Jan 2002, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
>
> It seems to me send-hook ~t is not working with autoedit and
> edit_headers set.
> Only the answer from the initial send-menu seems to be considered.
> Changes from the invoked editor and the compose menu don't seem to
> have any effect.
> This is a
On Jan 09, Will Yardley [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> so i didn't read the fine print and just realized that the editing
> threads patch doesn't work with Maildir.
>
> is there any sort of equivelant patch? is there a technical reason that
> this is harder to do with Maildir?
see
http://marc.thea
so i didn't read the fine print and just realized that the editing
threads patch doesn't work with Maildir.
is there any sort of equivelant patch? is there a technical reason that
this is harder to do with Maildir?
this is a feature i'd like to have (since i normally don't want to have
strict th
I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his
programs.
charlie
Thanks, Igor and Will,
I've found that .forward (with procmail called) works for default postfix settings.
As mentioned by Will, those advanced settings of procmail should have
been set by default.
Now my procmail can work well with postfix.
The only pity is procmail doesn't work (return -1) i
In our country, I used to receive messages without 'charset' specifed in
Content-Type:, while the text body is encoded in big5.
I have my mutt "set charset=big5" but the pager just display '?'s for
such messages (other charset-tagged messages are OK).
In Mozilla, I can have the following setting
On Jan 09, Matt Gumbel [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 05:08:34PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> > folder-hook . macro index d "=Trash/"
> > folder-hook . macro pager d "=Trash/"
>
> Thanks Will. If anyone else out there is going to use this, I
> had to cha
On Jan 09, Michael Burton [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Mutt 1.2.5 has an imap_checkinterval variable that one would think would
> rectify this problem, but it appears that mutt doesn't actually perform a
> check when the interval expires. Instead it seems to wait for user
> activity before perfor
On 2002.01.09, in <1010610421.2294.0.camel@panucho>,
"Ilkka Tuohela" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> =company/business
> which will be translated to imap://imap.company.com/Mail/business
> =private/brother
> and a folder like imap://isp-imap.isp.com/Mail/brother
> ...
> Of cou
Hi, I'm struggling to maintain imap connections across an IPF firewall using
mutt (on FreeBSD 4.4). The problem exists in both mutt 1.2.5.1 and 1.3.25, and I
haven't seen any references to it on the mailing list.
After 5 minutes, my firewall deletes old dynamic rules that haven't been used. T
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 05:08:34PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> folder-hook . macro index d "=Trash/"
> folder-hook . macro pager d "=Trash/"
> folder-hook =Trash macro index d ""
> folder-hook =Trash macro pager d ""
Thanks Will. If anyone else out there is going t
On Wed, 09 Jan 2002, Matt Gumbel wrote:
> Hi, I'm new to mutt and mutt-users and have been spending the
> afternoon configuring mutt the way I want it, but there's a
> couple things I can't figure out how to do and was wondering if
> anyone here could help me.
>
> 1) Save deleted messages to a f
Matt Gumbel wrote:
[both of these are in the archives a lot...]
> 1) Save deleted messages to a folder instead of deleting them
> permanently. I found a patch to do this here:
i use something like this
folder-hook . macro index d "=Trash/"
folder-hook . macro pager d "
Hi, I'm new to mutt and mutt-users and have been spending the
afternoon configuring mutt the way I want it, but there's a
couple things I can't figure out how to do and was wondering if
anyone here could help me.
1) Save deleted messages to a folder instead of deleting them
permanently. I found
Alas! Rob 'Feztaa' Park spake thus:
> Anybody have any ideas?
Aha! I now suspect this problem was due to me having Opera configured to
launch mutt, but not launch it in it's own aterm. I was wondering why
Opera wasn't doing anything when I tried to click on 'mailto:' links :)
I've configured Ope
I have this weird problem when I close Xwindows, and I _suspect_ that it
is related to mutt, but I am not sure.
Ever since I apt-get upgraded my box the last time (couple days ago),
I've been having this really weird problem where it _seems_ as though
mutt has hijacked the keyboard input from my
Patch worked fine to fix the behaviour I was seeing. I don't know anything
about the other reported anomolies, or if 's' should or shouldn't become
'S' if the key isn't locally signed... I suspect not, since I don't think
mutt gets that much info from gpg about the valid status.
Thomas are you f
I'd like to know is it actually possible to somehow 'alias' an IMAP
server namespace to a prefix? I'm using 2 IMAP accounts and everything
is fine, except that often I'd like to save an message to another
server: I get personal mail to company account and would like to store
it to private account
My best guess would be to use send-hooks.
Maybe something along the lines of:
set default_hook="~C %s"
send-hook . \
'my_hdr From: Benjamin Pharr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
send-hook .*[EMAIL PROTECTED] \
'my_hdr From: Benjamin Pharr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
Hope that works. It should,
Cristian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10 Jan 2002 00:04 +0100]:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:47:50PM -0800, Jonathan Irving wrote:
> > Yes, but as has been pointed out a number of times, the patch
> > does not cause the MIME type to be set to text/plain.
>
> This is just wrong. Setting the mime type to t
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:56:37PM -0600, Benjamin Pharr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> First of all, I have several different e-mail addresses I use for
> different purpose. Is there a "right" way to switch between "From"
> addresses?
I use:
alias f_de Nicolas Rachinsky
alias f_net Ni
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:47:50PM -0800, Jonathan Irving wrote:
> Yes, but as has been pointed out a number of times, the patch
> does not cause the MIME type to be set to text/plain.
This is just wrong. Setting the mime type to text/plain instead of
application/pgp is the very purpose of the ``
I am fairly new to Mutt, but I have RTFM and done a Google search, so
this is my last resort. I have a few questions I was hoping someone
could answer for me.
First of all, I have several different e-mail addresses I use for
different purpose. Is there a "right" way to switch between "From"
addre
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09 Jan 2002 15:08 +0100]:
> * On 09-01-02 at 15:05
> * John Perry said
>
> > Did I miss a patch for this? Guess I was reading my mail too fast. Can
> > someone point me to it?
> Hi
> I hope were talking about the same thing, I'm very new to mutt.
> I mean the
Igor Pruchanskiy wrote:
> Anyway, Postfix is NOT using .forward files by default, which I think
> is a good thing.
i'm not sure this is the case, unless a vendor configuration has
specifically disabled this by default.
on my system, default settings appear to say pretty much the same thing
you
> While I'm on RedHat, not Mandrake, my suspicion is that Mandrake may be
> set up so that you do not need a .forward file for postfix. Have you
> tried running without the .forward?
Sorry for late reply, but i am just catching up on my 927 new messages in
mutt-users mailbox :)
Anyway, Postfix
On Jan 09, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> ...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
> % So have any of you guys filed this as an actual bug against mutt yet?
> % Talking about it in the mailing lists is a lot less guaranteed to be seen,
> % to say the least.
>
> No, we leave that up to people wh
On Jan 09, Ren? Clerc [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> The clearsigned messages (like yours, Derek), show up with nothing in
> front in the message index; when I verify them using P, the
> signature is verified, and an 's' shows up: so no 'S' appears.
Well, something was awry, because I reported the
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-01-2002 17:40]:
| % The clearsigned messages (like yours, Derek), show up with nothing in
| % front in the message index; when I verify them using P, the
| % signature is verified, and an 's' shows up: so no 'S' appears.
|
| Make sure that the signature is bei
On Wed, 09 Jan 2002, Michael Tatge wrote:
>
> %Z includes the to_chars characters
>
Ok, that's what I needed to know. Thanks!
--
Knute
You live, You die. Enjoy the interval!
-- Clarence
On Jan 09, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> 'ello.
> I'm trying to organize the way I deal with my mail. I've got procmail up
> and running and would like a little advice before sorting all my lists
> and private mail.
Well, I use qmail '-' address extensions instead of procmail to sort l
Nick -
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * On 09-01-02 at 18:17
% * David T-G said
%
% > % I don't think my incoming mail is saved anywhere and that isn't ideal
% > % either.
% >
% > It will only be saved somewhere when you specify so in your procmailrc
% > file(s).
%
% Okay, which di
Knute muttered:
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2002, MuttER wrote:
>
> I added the %T for the to_chars stuff in my index.
> What I noticed is that the Message Statuses seem to echo that to a
> certain extent. (I only did it today, and have yet to see difference.)
>
> What is the diff between the to_chars
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 09-01-02 at 18:17
* David T-G said
> % I don't think my incoming mail is saved anywhere and that isn't ideal
> % either.
>
> It will only be saved somewhere when you specify so in your procmailrc
> file(s).
Okay, which directive handles
hi all,
i've just upgraded to mutt 1.3.25 (debian), and now mutt fails
understanding whether a signature is valid or not.
i use the italian locale, so the pgp_good_sign should be something
like "^gpg: Firma valida da ".
i tried setting pgp_good_sign to "" and to "^gpg: Firma valida da",
but it
I would like to suggest that people judiciously edit the text to which they are
replying and remove unnecessary sentences. I'm seeing a lot of messages
which I have to scroll down a ways on my 80x24 term before I can see the
text of the message, and its quite annoying. If you are going to inline
On Wed, 09 Jan 2002, MuttER wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:31:45AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> > Jim Mock wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there a flag for to_chars to display whether or not the message
> > > contains an attachment? I looked through the manual, but don't see
> > > one (appears th
Todd --
...and then Todd Kokoszka said...
%
% > The %O expando will do it. Something like
...
%
% Thanks for the response. This saves it in %0.outgoing
% for me. I had tried
Use an oh (letter) and not a zero (number) :-)
HTH & HAND
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to f
Mutt currently doesn't allow you to specify the format of the message-id
field, other than your setting of $host. Perhaps you could use some
send-hook's that set your $host based upon which virtual domain you want to
use?
me
On Wed, 09 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> * On 09-01-02 at 17:59
> * Knute said
>
> > Now that I can send mail from my computer again, I'm running into a
> > frusterating issue. This issue also prevented me from telling you how I
> %
> % I want to save outgoing messages in a file
> % .outgoing. I tried messing around with
> % fcc-hook but I didn't know how to send the
>
> % to the second parameter of fcc-hook.
>
> The %O expando will do it. Something like
>
> fcc-hook . =%O.outgoing
>
> should work.
Thanks for th
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 12:18:19 +0100, Markus Boelter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..skip..]
> 022? Is it also possible to define a path in the configuration?
-- from http://www.mutt.org/changes.html ;-)
macro attach s "~/" "Pre-pend ~/ when saving attachments"
>
> I want to save all attachments in
Todd --
...and then Todd Kokoszka said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% I want to save outgoing messages in a file
% .outgoing. I tried messing around with
% fcc-hook but I didn't know how to send the
% to the second parameter of fcc-hook.
The %O expando will do it. Something like
fcc-hook . =%O.
Hi,
I want to save outgoing messages in a file
.outgoing. I tried messing around with
fcc-hook but I didn't know how to send the
to the second parameter of fcc-hook.
Thanks for any help.
Todd
=
Todd Kokoszka
25, rue Richard Lenoir
75011 Paris
Tel. 01.43.72.77.08
_
* On 09-01-02 at 17:59
* René Clerc said
> With me, all PGP/Mime signed messages show up with an 's' if they're
> not verified yet; it changes to an 'S' when I open them and they're
> verified, even when I haven't signed the user's key.
>
> The clearsigned messages (like yours, Derek), sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 09-01-02 at 17:59
* Knute said
> Now that I can send mail from my computer again, I'm running into a
> frusterating issue. This issue also prevented me from telling you how I
> fixed that before, cause the message only went to one perso
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:31:45AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> Jim Mock wrote:
> >
> > Is there a flag for to_chars to display whether or not the message
> > contains an attachment? I looked through the manual, but don't see
> > one (appears there's only " +TCFL"). Am I missing something or is
Rene --
...and then Rene Clerc said...
%
% The clearsigned messages (like yours, Derek), show up with nothing in
% front in the message index; when I verify them using P, the
% signature is verified, and an 's' shows up: so no 'S' appears.
Make sure that the signature is being verified when you
On Wed, 09 Jan 2002 17:01:30 +0100, Volker Moell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..skip..]
>
> But isn't it possible that mutt detects the correct/intended filename to
> save the file "Datei Volker Moll 1.jpg" instead the file
> "?iso-8859-1?Q?Datei=5FVolker_M=F6ll=5F1.jpg?=" in the $folder directory
Fernando --
...and then Fernando M. Maresca said...
%
% Hi, everybody.
Hello, and welcome!
% Well, I'm new to mutt, I've used pine for a long time, and I can't filter the mail
messages *after reading* them
% in the incoming folder, in the same manner that in pine was.
If you really insist
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% 'ello.
'iya!
% I'm trying to organize the way I deal with my mail. I've got procmail up
% and running and would like a little advice before sorting all my lists
% and private mail.
Good idea.
%
% At present everything is in ~/Mail which means th
LOL Glad it was only a short between the keyboard and chair!
Thanks to both of you. 8o)
On Wed, 09 Jan 2002, Dave Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:50:57AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Now that I can send mail from my computer again, I'm running into a
> > frusterating issue.
On Tue, 08 Jan 2002 12:04:15 -0500, Andy Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Mutters,
>
> I suspect that it doesn't have anything to do with mutt, but I don't know
> who else to ask. The thing is that all of a sudden all mails from a friend
> of mine (who also uses mutt) have TABs in these
* Derek D. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-01-2002 16:27]:
| I'm finding that some of my messages, which all seem to be either
| PGP-MIME or converted using the procmail rules, NEVER change from 's'
| to 'S' even when signature verifies and I HAVE signed the user's key.
With me, all PGP/Mime sign
> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 22:08:18 +0800
> From: Charles Jie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Mutt Mail-list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Possible to get the mail fetched by getmail filtered?
>
> Thank you, Charles, Roman and Mark.
>
> I've tried procmail and maildrop to go with getmail but all fai
Now that I can send mail from my computer again, I'm running into a
frusterating issue. This issue also prevented me from telling you how I
fixed that before, cause the message only went to one person!
When I hit r to reply to a message, the To: field is set to whoever
sent the message, rathe
Hi, everybody.
Well, I'm new to mutt, I've used pine for a long time, and I can't filter the mail
messages *after reading* them
in the incoming folder, in the same manner that in pine was.
Some help?
Thank you,
--
Fernando M. Maresca
Monitoring Station S.A.
48 nº 812 La Plata (1900) BA - ARG
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:26:51PM +0700, budsz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How to change directory index like "tree" in mutt, I mean like this:
>
> message1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |
>---
> message2| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
> message3 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] and so on.
>
> I'
Hello,
is it possible to use some wildcard for Message-ID header generation?
I would like ;) to have Message-ID geenrated according to my virtual
domain, not local hostname.
Or use some external program to generate unique message id's?
TIA
Paulius
budsz --
...and then budsz said...
%
% Hi,
%
% How to change directory index like "tree" in mutt, I mean like this:
...
%
% I've try for version mutt old that's like "tree", so I can look someone
% got reply email in mailing list.
Set your sort order to threaded instead of whatever it is now.
Jeremy --
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
%
% On Jan 09, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% > > All PGP users I know either use Pine or Outlook, so as far as I am
% > > concerned, (unpatched) Mutt's PGP support is currently only usable for
% > > the Mutt mailing lists -- no matter how p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'ello.
I'm trying to organize the way I deal with my mail. I've got procmail up
and running and would like a little advice before sorting all my lists
and private mail.
At present everything is in ~/Mail which means there are hundreds of
files in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 09-01-02 at 16:19
* budsz said
> Hi,
>
> How to change directory index like "tree" in mutt, I mean like this:
>
> message1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |
>---
> message2| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
> message3 | [
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Jeremy Blosser hath spake thusly:
> > Note that viewing *this* message did not change the 's' to 'S' even
> > though I have verification on and the signature was good because I have
> > not signed my copy of your key. I expect
Hi,
How to change directory index like "tree" in mutt, I mean like this:
message1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
---
message2| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
message3 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] and so on.
I've try for version mutt old that's like "tree", so I can look someone
got r
On Jan 09, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > All PGP users I know either use Pine or Outlook, so as far as I am
> > concerned, (unpatched) Mutt's PGP support is currently only usable for
> > the Mutt mailing lists -- no matter how pgp_create_traditional is set.
> >
> > Time for a change
Thank you, Charles, Roman and Mark.
I've tried procmail and maildrop to go with getmail but all failed. I
believe they should be able to work someday when I have enough hard work
on them. :)
Report:
1. procmail returns (-1) while I have the following in
.getmail/getmailrc:
postmaster = "|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 09-01-02 at 15:05
* John Perry said
> Did I miss a patch for this? Guess I was reading my mail too fast. Can
> someone point me to it?
Hi
I hope were talking about the same thing, I'm very new to mutt.
I mean the pgp_outlook_compat patch (
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:06:06PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
>
> * On 09-01-02 at 14:03
> * John Perry said
>
> > I really hope this happens. The application/pgp MIME type is ok
> > but it's ahead of it's time. I too use a macro in Vim to handle GPG. It
> > would be great if Mutt itself
Hi,
of course it is possible to create traditional PGP messages in a
decent editor. I just successfully tried to use the Mailcrypt package
for Emacs when editing a message for Mutt in post.el mode.
There's just one caveat: I had to set noedit_headers to avoid signing
the headers as well. I origi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 09-01-02 at 14:03
* John Perry said
> I really hope this happens. The application/pgp MIME type is ok
> but it's ahead of it's time. I too use a macro in Vim to handle GPG. It
> would be great if Mutt itself would use text/plain.
Th
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:27:20AM -0500, Ken Wahl wrote:
>
> A gentleman in news:comp.mail.mutt posted these Vim bindings a couple of
> days ago which allow you to (d)encrypt, clearsign, or both directly in Vim.
> Thereby keeping the text/plain mime-type. Might this be a temporary
> workaround,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 12:56:53PM +0100, Cristian wrote:
>
> I think this issue is a strong point in favour of ME's suggestion:
>
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:40:53AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
> > At this point I have to agree with this sentimen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then on 09-01-02 13:03 Cristian said
> All PGP users I know either use Pine or Outlook, so as far as I am
> concerned, (unpatched) Mutt's PGP support is currently only usable for
> the Mutt mailing lists -- no matter how pgp_create_traditio
Jeremy, et al --
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
%
% On Jan 08, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% > % 1. use the new check-traditional-pgp command from the index on a message
% > %that has an old-style pgp signature
% > % 2. note that the 's' flag appears to indicate the presence of
Hi Mutt & PGP users,
hello to the Mutt developers,
nobody seems to notice that not only Outlook gets confused by
application/pgp messages -- Pine cannot handle them, too!
That means that with an unpatched Mutt it is impossible to create
PGP signed or encrypted emails for Outlook or Pine users, e
Volker --
...and then Volker Moell said...
%
% David T-G wrote:
% >
% > .
% >
% > to tag 'em all, hit esc-P for 'em, and then untag?
%
% Great, thanks! I should think more in macros. :-)
No problem :-)
%
% But while trying out this ferature I saw, that I didn't convince mutt to
% seek i
By default the matched line is just glued at the top.
Is there something like a target line for the search function in the
builtin pager? (Something like -j for `less'?)
-Hanspeter
On Jan 08, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> % 1. use the new check-traditional-pgp command from the index on a message
> %that has an old-style pgp signature
> % 2. note that the 's' flag appears to indicate the presence of the signature
> % 3. view the message, with pgp_verify_sig=no
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then on 09-01-02 11:42 Alexander Wasmuth said
> Mmh, \n seems to work here, perhaps the quotes are necessary.
>
> set attribution="%n schrieb:\n"
You're right I must have been making some odd typo.
Thanks very much.
- --
Nick Wils
Nick Wilson schrieb:
> I've been trying to work out how to put a 'return' at the end of my set
> attribution string so the result would look like
[...]
> I've looked at the docs but can't work it out and I've tried \r \rn and
> \n to no avail.
Mmh, \n seems to work here, perhaps the quotes
* Magnus Bodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-09 08:57]:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:47:15PM +0300, Im Eunjea wrote:
> > * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-08 19:22]:
> > > Mutt decodes messages with the following
> > > charset to only a bunch of question marks:
> > >
> > > Content-Type:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
I've been trying to work out how to put a 'return' at the end of my set
attribution string so the result would look like
On blah someone wroter this
>Here is the the quoted msg
See what I mean?
I've looked at the docs but can't wor
David T-G wrote:
>
> Do you mean a folder of emails that are non-MIME pgp and you want them to
> be seen as PGP messages? Well, what about a muttrc hook line or a macro
> that simply says
>
> .
>
> to tag 'em all, hit esc-P for 'em, and then untag?
Great, thanks! I should think more in macr
88 matches
Mail list logo
