Alas! David T-G spake thus:
> Funny, but my prompt really used to be > back in my early days.
Of course, good old Wintendo has always used the '>' character at the
end of the DOS prompt... and I dunno what shell you guys are using, but
mine uses $ for user and # for root... '%' doesn't enter into
Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus:
> Anyone got the equivelant Procmail recipe for dumping mail if it's
> text/html ot not addressed to you? I use this to get the latter:
>
> :0:
> * !(^[EMAIL PROTECTED])
> ~/Mail/Other/suspect
>
> Which works fine, adding the ability to weed out html would make it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Will Yardley blurted
> i agree with recent posts about this list. this used to be one of the
> lists i enjoyed reading most since most people had good ettiquette
> (unlike many other mailing lists i'm on) and since it had a minimum of
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Roman Neuhauser thusly...
>
> Procmail:
...
> is there something that you sorely lack in your favorite MDA?
one thing that i would want in procmail is the ability to mix and
match AND/OR conditions to my heart's content. currently, it's
possible to some deg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Roman Neuhauser blurted
> Like this?
>
> if(/^Content-Type: text\/html/ && hasaddr([EMAIL PROTECTED]))
> to $MBOXDIR/crap
>
> X-Warning: had a few beers.
Anyone got the equivelant Procmail recipe for dumpi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Brian Clark blurted
> :0:
> * ^From.*pc-html-user@domain\.com
> /dev/null
>
> Save yourself from having to explain further. :-)
Hehe, yeah, that'd do it!
- --
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:www.ex
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Roman Neuhauser thusly...
>
> Procmail:
...
> - quite resource-hungry (keeps the whole message in memory while
> processing it)
well, i get around 100-300 messages a day from various mailing lists
and it has not bothered me, resources wise, a bit o
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 05:49:27PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
> > 2. I got tired of explaining text-only MUAs to them only to receive
> > comments like, "I guess Unix isn't very good if it can't even
> > display different colors and fonts like my PC can. When are you
> > guys going to
Jeremy, et al --
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
%
% On Jan 24, Samuel Padgett [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% > David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
% > > I seem to be the only one who likes percent, but if I used one of |:}#
% > > then apparently nobody would mind since mutt would already rec
Sam --
...and then Samuel Padgett said...
%
% David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
%
% > I seem to be the only one who likes percent, but if I used one of |:}#
% > then apparently nobody would mind since mutt would already recognize it.
%
% Hm.
%
% % grep 'quote_regexp\|smiley' .muttrc
% set
On 21:26 24 Jan 2002, Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On 25/01/02 Ricardo SIGNES did speaketh:
| > Consider perl's Mail::Audit module.
|
| I tried that for a while, but when I had 100 email in the queue, forking
| 100 copies of Perl hit my box a _lot_ harder than the equal num
On Jan 24, Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Jan 25, Roman Neuhauser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > Now, what bugs me about both of these programs: to the best of my
> > knowledge, neither offers you a real programming language. This can be a
> > plus, or a minus (YMMV), but imagine b
On 02:58 25 Jan 2002, Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I'd like to colllect feedback on an idea that's been on my mind for some
| time now:
|
| looks like there's just two MDA's in use: Procmail, and Maildrop. Both
| have their fine (and not so fine) points, which I'll summarize brief
On Jan 25, Roman Neuhauser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Now, what bugs me about both of these programs: to the best of my
> knowledge, neither offers you a real programming language. This can be a
> plus, or a minus (YMMV), but imagine being able to write filters using a
> full-featured scripting
On 25/01/02 Ricardo SIGNES did speaketh:
> Consider perl's Mail::Audit module.
I tried that for a while, but when I had 100 email in the queue, forking
100 copies of Perl hit my box a _lot_ harder than the equal number of procmail
instances. I'm not sure how good the process-space sharing is
On Jan 24, Samuel Padgett [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I seem to be the only one who likes percent, but if I used one of |:}#
> > then apparently nobody would mind since mutt would already recognize it.
> % grep 'quote_regexp\|smiley' .muttrc
This message
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 02:58:20AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> looks like there's just two MDA's in use: Procmail, and Maildrop. Both
> have their fine (and not so fine) points, which I'll summarize briefly
> (YMMV):
Consider perl's Mail::Audit module.
--
rjbs
Hi there,
I'd like to colllect feedback on an idea that's been on my mind for some
time now:
looks like there's just two MDA's in use: Procmail, and Maildrop. Both
have their fine (and not so fine) points, which I'll summarize briefly
(YMMV):
Procmail:
+ lots of prepackaged antispam filters
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I seem to be the only one who likes percent, but if I used one of |:}#
> then apparently nobody would mind since mutt would already recognize it.
Hm.
% grep 'quote_regexp\|smiley' .muttrc
set quote_regexp="^([ \t]*>)+"
set smileys=">From "
;-(
Sam
Brian --
...and then Brian Clark said...
%
% * David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 24. 2002 10:00]:
%
% > ...and then Brian Clark said...
%
% > % I was trying to get something similar to work yesterday. No one
% > % finds it odd that one can't check a single signature? I've given
...
% > I thin
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 18:42:05 -0500
> From: Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OT] html email
>
> * Matthew D. Fuller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 24. 2002 18:29]:
> If it catches a friend, newletter, etc, I just add the sender's address
> to a file ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> if I wanted to completely empty a mailbox?
"D." will delete ALL.
igor
- --
Uptime : 43 days, 16:25
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8UKFcxOY724kDbSARAoDUAJ47RQ9Mq
* Brian Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 24. 2002 18:54]:
> But to make this semi-OT:
D'oh, make that `semi-On-Topic'
--
Brian Clark | Avoiding the general public since 1805!
Fingerprint: 07CE FA37 8DF6 A109 8119 076B B5A2 E5FB E4D0 C7C8
Stop searching forever. Happiness is unattainable.
* Anh Lai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 24. 2002 15:38]:
> how do i keep adding my signature when replying? I would like to add
> it only when composing a new messgae. Having my signature collect on
> the bottom gets annoying sometimes.
If you use vim, this is what I use in my .vimrc:
au BufEnter
* Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 24. 2002 18:34]:
> On Jan 24, Brian Clark [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > OK, maybe I'm not getting something about GnuPG and/or Mutt's
> > interaction with GnuPG, then (Nope, not being sarcastic here). If
> > I set this thing to verify all signatures, an
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:36:28 -0600
> From: Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OT] html email
>
> On Jan 24, Matthew D. Fuller [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > Actually, I've found that this:
> > if(/^Content-Type: text\/html/)
> > to $MBOXDIR/crap
>
* Matthew D. Fuller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 24. 2002 18:29]:
> Actually, I've found that this:
> if(/^Content-Type: text\/html/)
> to $MBOXDIR/crap
> catches more of my spam than any other of my off-the-cuff heuristics
> (I mean, like at factor of 2 more, and seemingly more than the rest
>
On Jan 24, Brian Clark [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> OK, maybe I'm not getting something about GnuPG and/or Mutt's
> interaction with GnuPG, then (Nope, not being sarcastic here). If I set
> this thing to verify all signatures, and I have my keyserver settings in
> place, every single key that I ve
On 2002.01.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mike Schiraldi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > also, since most people on the list don't know you in real life, all
> > they know is that you're the same person who has always been writing
> > email under that name and with that PGP key. there's no
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 06:18:43PM -0500 I heard the voice of
Brian Clark, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> :0:
> * ^From.*pc-html-user@domain\.com
> /dev/null
Actually, I've found that this:
if(/^Content-Type: text\/html/)
to $MBOXDIR/crap
catches more of my spam than any other of my off-the-cuf
* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 24. 2002 10:00]:
> ...and then Brian Clark said...
> % I was trying to get something similar to work yesterday. No one
> % finds it odd that one can't check a single signature? I've given
> % up, and just set pgp_verify_sig to ask-no, but I have to hit Enter
At some point hitherto, Jeremy Blosser hath spake thusly:
> > IIRC, recently someone posted a macro that would essentially perform
> > Esc-P on every message in a folder. I spent the morning combing
> > through the archives, but I couldn't find it.
>
> ~A~A
>
> It needs at the appropriate plac
At some point hitherto, Preben Randhol hath spake thusly:
> > matter). It's much harder to forge a valid, signed mail, because you
> > need access to the victim's PGP _private_ key, and their passphrase.
>
> Yes but who knows? I just get information from gnupg that it cannot
> verify the signed
> also, since most people on the list don't know you in real life, all
> they know is that you're the same person who has always been writing
> email under that name and with that PGP key. there's no real advantage
> to doing this IMHO in most cases.
I disagree -- if Thomas didn't sign all his m
So sprach »Alexander 'Digital Projects' Skwar« am 2002-01-24 um 22:52:09 +0100 :
> Hi!
>
> Since recently, when I try to display a HTML from within the viewer (ie.
> I press 'v' to get the attachment viewer and then select the HTML
> attachment), I get this error message:
>
> fopen: File exists
Preben Randhol wrote:
[i'll respond to both posts since i held my tongue on the first for a
while]
> "Drekka mer D. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/01/2002
> (19:34) :
>
> > The point is, it's very, very easy to forge mail to mailing lists
> > (or not to mailing lists, for that matter).
So sprach »Preben Randhol« am 2002-01-24 um 11:59:01 +0100 :
> I have just installed gnupg on my system and set it up. I wonder how
> ever why people sign their mails to mailinglists? Perhaps there is
Unknown. It doesn't add any security but just wastes bandwith.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Ross A. Osborn blurted
> Is anybody else getting tired of this debate? Could you fellas take
> this off-line somewhere?
No! Don't kill it now, I was there at the begining and I've come over
all parental at thought of killing such a b
Hi!
Since recently, when I try to display a HTML from within the viewer (ie.
I press 'v' to get the attachment viewer and then select the HTML
attachment), I get this error message:
fopen: File exists (errno = 17)
Well, how comes? My .mailcap contains this:
text/html; w3m -T text/html %s
It
"Drekka mer D. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/01/2002 (19:34) :
> Sorry I misspelled your name. :) The point is, it's very, very easy
> to forge mail to mailing lists (or not to mailing lists, for that
> matter). It's much harder to forge a valid, signed mail, because you
> need access
So sprach »David T-G« am 2002-01-24 um 14:48:30 -0500 :
> ... and even clickable if you're running under eterm, IIRC. Check the
gnome-term (and I think also the KDE konsole) also feature this.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepa
Alas! Gary Johnson spake thus:
> 2. I got tired of explaining text-only MUAs to them only to receive
> comments like, "I guess Unix isn't very good if it can't even
> display different colors and fonts like my PC can. When are you
> guys going to start using Windows?"
Yeah, Unix rea
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:11:16PM -0500, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> Alas! Preben Randhol spake thus:
> > No he didn't ask for that. He said he used lynx. I said w3m is better,
> > but it isn't when you use the browser with a screenreader then lynx is
> > better.
>
> He said "I'm looking for a br
On Jan 24, Derek D. Martin [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> At some point hitherto, David T-G hath spake thusly:
> > Unless I've misunderstood (and need correction), you've mixed two
> > different items: traditional checking (accomplished via esc-P) and
> > on-demand verifying (accomplished through va
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park blurted
> He said "I'm looking for a browser that supports javascript." I don't
> know about you, but to me this is equivalent to "What browsers support
> javascript?"
Is this thread still going? You two are like a c
* Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020124 22:13]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> * and then Maarten den Braber blurted
> > > like this?
> > >
> > > set editor="vim +'/^$/' -c ':set textwidth=72'"
> >
> > Almost. You can only use the 'thingie' in a macro definitio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Maarten den Braber blurted
> > like this?
> >
> > set editor="vim +'/^$/' -c ':set textwidth=72'"
>
> Almost. You can only use the 'thingie' in a macro definition,
> $editor is just the editor variable.
Thanks Maarten, got it now.
Alas! Preben Randhol spake thus:
> No he didn't ask for that. He said he used lynx. I said w3m is better,
> but it isn't when you use the browser with a screenreader then lynx is
> better.
He said "I'm looking for a browser that supports javascript." I don't
know about you, but to me this is equi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then David Champion blurted
> The "\n" terminates the ":set editor" command. It's the same action
> as pressing the ENTER key. "" inside a macro tells mutt to
> execute the function. This is bound to "m" by default. Most
> people probably
On 2002.01.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nick Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * and then Maarten den Braber blurted
> > Maybe it's A Good Thing to give an example to ;-), here it is:
> >
> > bind index r noop
> > bind index m noop
>
> What's a noop?
No-op: no operation [on th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Maarten den Braber blurted
> i don't get your question, do you mean how mutt knows when to reply or
> compose? that's in the 'm'ail and 'r'eply keys i use.
Yes, sorry. I put 2 and 2 together once I'd seen Wills post, and saw the
agai
* Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020124 21:21]:
> > macro index m ":set editor=blah\n"
> > macro index r ":set editor=blah\n"
> > macro index R ":set editor=blah\n"
> > macro index L ":set editor=blah\n"
>
> Ah now I see a pattern, you can put the thingy in the set editor
> bit. So how might i
At some point hitherto, Steven Schneider hath spake thusly:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 07:59:27PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > I've noticed that quite a few people on this list send a
> > > "quoted/printable" attachment with thier main message body even when
> > > using mutt. It's not a pro
* Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020124 21:17]:
> > bind index r noop
> > bind index m noop
>
> What's a noop?
noop means as much as 'do nothing' (no operation or something i guess),
i thought that the macros wouldn't work if i didn't do this, but maybe
they do. i don't know for sure.
> > mac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Will Yardley blurted
> why not just use different macros for 'compose' and 'reply' - ie:
> (untested)
> macro index m ":set editor=blah\n"
> macro index r ":set editor=blah\n"
> macro index R ":set editor=blah\n"
> macro index L ":set
At some point hitherto, David T-G hath spake thusly:
> Unless I've misunderstood (and need correction), you've mixed two
> different items: traditional checking (accomplished via esc-P) and
> on-demand verifying (accomplished through various macros). Can you
> confirm or deny?
Related to this:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Maarten den Braber blurted
> Maybe it's A Good Thing to give an example to ;-), here it is:
>
> bind index r noop
> bind index m noop
What's a noop?
> macro index m ":set editor=\"vim -c ':0;/Subject'\\\n"
> macro index r ":set edit
> I want to use a different $editor var whenever I either *reply* to or
> *compose* a message.
I don't know much about vi, but how about writing a function that greps for
/^in-reply-to:/ and takes it from there? Or a shell script like:
# untested
if grep -i ^in-reply-to $1; then vi --do-reply $1
Nick Wilson wrote:
> I want to use a different $editor var whenever I either *reply* to or
> *compose* a message. Reason being a different cursor starting point
> for each one (on the attribution for replying and on the top line for
> composing).
why not just use different macros for 'compose'
On Jan 24, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Volker, et al --
> % the last five months I read mutt-users this problem came up several
> % times. Lots of mutt-users post their (more or less) complicated macros
> % which always have their disadvantages. Ok, it seems not to me mutt's
> % philos
* Maarten den Braber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020124 20:03]:
> * Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020124 19:15]:
> > I want to use a different $editor var whenever I either *reply* to or
> > *compose* a message. Reason being a different cursor starting point for
> > each one (on the attribution for re
Rob, et al --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! Alexander Skwar spake thus:
% > Well, sure it is - however don't all the HTML capable MUAs convert texts
% > like http://this-is-not.a.link.de into a clickable link? Mozilla does.
%
% Mutt highlights that as a mail, and urlview recognizes it a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Maarten den Braber blurted
> Can't you bind a macro to the key that you press when replying and when
> composing a message?
Well, I'm not sure hence the subject line to this thread. If I knew how
to do either one I would have done it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I want to use a different $editor var whenever I either *reply* to or
*compose* a message. Reason being a different cursor starting point for
each one (on the attribution for replying and on the top line for
composing).
I'm not sure how to d
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 07:59:27PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
>
> > I've noticed that quite a few people on this list send a
> > "quoted/printable" attachment with thier main message body even when
> > using mutt. It's not a problem really, I'm just curious as to why
> > this is.
>
> I've not not
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 05:49:27PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
> * and then Gary Johnson blurted
> > It depends on how you have mutt configured. I have my mailcap file and
> > auto_view command set up to display HTML attachments as plain text in
> > mutt's pager and have display_filter set to
Volker, et al --
...and then Volker Moell said...
%
% [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% >
% > Then I sugest you to use:
% >
% > macro pager \cv "set
pgp_verify_sig\nunset pgp_verify_sig\n" "Check
PGP sig"
%
% One question: Why isn't there a general solution for this FAQ (sic!)? In
*This* questio
Alas! Alexander Skwar spake thus:
> Well, sure it is - however don't all the HTML capable MUAs convert texts
> like http://this-is-not.a.link.de into a clickable link? Mozilla does.
Mutt highlights that as a mail, and urlview recognizes it as a link. No
need for HTML-enabled mailers at all. Not
On 2002.01.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew, et al --
>
> ...and then David Champion said...
> %
> % set editor="vi '+/^-- $/;,$d'"
>
> Note that this will actually strip your signature and not that of the
> original email.
>
> Given your mac
* Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020124 19:15]:
> I want to use a different $editor var whenever I either *reply* to or
> *compose* a message. Reason being a different cursor starting point for
> each one (on the attribution for replying and on the top line for
> composing).
> I'm not sure how
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * and then Anh Lai blurted
% > How do I make mutt color lines starting with % as a quote just like >
%
% set indent_string="% "
Not quite... That's how *I* make my quotes use percent instead of a
greater.
%
% > apparently David only uses this
Matthew, et al --
...and then David Champion said...
%
% On 2002.01.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
% "matthew pritchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% > Is it possible to strip signatures when replying to mails? Slrn seems
...
% > could come up with is a vi macro:
% >
% > map _qs G?^>^M?^> --
On 2002.01.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"matthew pritchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to strip signatures when replying to mails? Slrn seems
> to automatically do this for me 'out of the box' (There's a
> strip_sig_regexp variable). I've searched on google, and the best I
So sprach »Nick Wilson« am 2002-01-23 um 18:04:08 +0100 :
> find clicking a link in an email easier than pasting it into a browser.
> It /is/ easier. They're just not aware of the down points of html mail.
Well, sure it is - however don't all the HTML capable MUAs convert texts
like http://this-i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then JT blurted
> Sounds like someone sent a part that got base-64 encoded. There should be
> something like a filename or some information in the Content-headers for
> that part which tell you something about it.
Yes, it was base-64 en
Hi,
Sorry if this is done before, but I wanted to support DSN under cygwin.
sendmail isnt the easiest thing to compile under cygwin, and a bit
overkill, so I've tweaked ssmtp to take the DSN flags in a sendmailish
style.
Regards,
Luke
--- ssmtp-2.38.7-3/ssmtp.c Thu Jun 7 13:54:20 2001
+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
> Yeah. Thanks guys, reason I asked was that I've gotten a couple of odd
> mails from one of the w3c lists i'm on. multipart/alternative and when I
> open if it's just full of stuff that looks very much like a p
> 2. I got tired of explaining text-only MUAs to them only to receive
> comments like, "I guess Unix isn't very good if it can't even
> display different colors and fonts like my PC can. When are you
> guys going to start using Windows?"
It all comes down to who should be in control
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Michael Tatge blurted
> I bet that works, except you press the wrong keys. :)
> Ctrl-d is \cd in mutt. See manual section 3.3.
Not sure I get you there but I eventually solved it by using '^D' as
opposed to '^d'
Cheers
- --
Nick Wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Gary Johnson blurted
> It depends on how you have mutt configured. I have my mailcap file and
> auto_view command set up to display HTML attachments as plain text in
> mutt's pager and have display_filter set to remove the "[-- ... --
Nick Wilson muttered:
> macro pager d
>
> which makes sure that when I delete a message I'm taken back to the
> index.
>
> I'd like to do the same thing if I decide to delete a thread. I've tried
> the following...
>
> macro pager ^d
>
> to no avail. Anyone spot what I'm doing wrong?
I bet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Then I sugest you to use:
>
> macro pager \cv "set
>pgp_verify_sig\nunset pgp_verify_sig\n" "Check
>PGP sig"
One question: Why isn't there a general solution for this FAQ (sic!)? In
the last five months I read mutt-users this problem came up several
times. Lots
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Anh Lai blurted
> How do I make mutt color lines starting with % as a quote just like >
set indent_string="% "
> apparently David only uses this, and i would like to learn how to add %
> as a quote indicator.
Oh boy, are you in for
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 12:47:25PM -0500, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> the colors are fixable - what is painful for html email regarding mutt is
> that since the html attachments don't show up except as a single line, I
> tend to delete the email before reading it. (There are inevitably some
> peop
At some point hitherto, Preven Randhol hath spake thusly:
> At some point hitherto, Preben Randhol hath spake thusly:
> > also found a way to get rid of this problem with signed posts (which I
> > think is unnecessary for ordinary posts).
>
> Signing on mailing lists is used to prevent this probl
how do i keep adding my signature when replying? I would like to add it only
when composing a new messgae. Having my signature collect on the bottom gets
annoying sometimes.
--
Anh Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Student of Computer Engineering
~
fetchmail does the trick
[ On 01/05/02, Charles Jie decided to write: ]
> Now I have a mail system = postfix + mutt + procmail + getmail.
>
> getmail fetches my mail in some POP3 servers. But it just places mail in
> some mboxes - compared to the mail received by postfix and
> sorted/fi
At some point hitherto, Preben Randhol hath spake thusly:
> David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/01/2002 (12:18) :
> >
> > This has come up at least twice, in great detail, in recent memory.
> > Check the archives for more so that we don't have to get into it again :-)
>
> Ah I found it in
I've written patch which brings message filtering to mutt. Once applied, you
can press F from within mutt to begin the process of setting up mail
filters.
The patch is short, so i've attached in inline:
--- Muttrc.head.in.old Thu Jan 24 11:00:52 2002
+++ Muttrc.head.in Thu Jan 24 11:01:10
At some point hitherto, Erika Pacholleck hath spake thusly:
> I have been reading all your arguments in that blind etiquette
> thread and more than once I was tempted to reply. I did not,
> I have a rule not allow any mail to upset me any longer.
That's a good policy. :)
> Now there is a simple
Jason Nealis on 24/01/2002 at 10:17 opined thusly:
> 1) Can mutt automatically take incoming mail and push it into
> a mail folder
No, this would be the job of your MDA. For most people that is
procmail. But as someone so tactfully pointed out to me, there are
alternatives which you may find
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Jason Nealis blurted
> Two quick questions :
>
> 1) Can mutt automatically take incoming mail and push it into a mail folder, for
>instance
> take all mail addressed To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and push that into my mail folder
>mutt-user
On Jan 24, Jason Nealis [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> 1) Can mutt automatically take incoming mail and push it into a mail
> folder, for instance take all mail addressed To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> push that into my mail folder mutt-users. I tried to do this with
> save-hooks but it didn't work.
Jason --
...and then Jason Nealis said...
%
% Two quick questions :
%
% 1) Can mutt automatically take incoming mail and push it into a mail folder, for
instance
% take all mail addressed To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and push that into my mail folder
mutt-users.
% I tried to do this with save-hooks
On Jan 24, Brian Clark [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jan 24. 2002 07:26]:
> I was trying to get something similar to work yesterday. No one finds it
> odd that one can't check a single signature? I've given up, and just set
> pgp_verify_sig to ask-no, but I have to hit Enter tw
Two quick questions :
1) Can mutt automatically take incoming mail and push it into a mail folder, for
instance
take all mail addressed To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and push that into my mail folder
mutt-users.
I tried to do this with save-hooks but it didn't work. Should I use procmail instead?
2)
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:13:20AM -0500, Brian Clark wrote:
> No one finds it odd that one can't check a single signature?
I find it strange... :)
> I've given up, and just set
> pgp_verify_sig to ask-no, but I have to hit Enter twice when entering a
> message. I'd rather set it to 'no' and se
Brian, et al --
...and then Brian Clark said...
%
% * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jan 24. 2002 07:26]:
%
% > Works well, although 'toggle pgp_verify_sig' works better, like
...
%
% I was trying to get something similar to work yesterday. No one finds it
% odd that one can't check a single signature? I'
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jan 24. 2002 07:26]:
[...]
> Works well, although 'toggle pgp_verify_sig' works better, like
> somebody in this thread has noticed. On the other hand when I'm in a
> pager I still have to leave current message and then enter it again
> to check sign - but never mind, I have
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 07:12:11PM +0800, Pun Kuan Tou wrote:
> How to make some different color in body something like
> *text* _text_ etc?
It may have been done better before, but:
color body brightred default \\*[^*]{0,30}\\*
color body brightred default _[^_]{0,3
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
