On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 08:31:55PM +, rex wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 02:51:19PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
...and then Belinda Roussel said...
% I need to send an html web page on Unix and I don't know how to. Could
% anyone please give me some guidance or direct me to a helpful
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 06:49:15PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 2000-03-30 17:11:26 +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
I'm offering 11 bytes, plus portability.
Does it work anything like the attached program?
No. Just try
#!/bin/cat
Hm. I had almost the same idea :)
|
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 06:13:16PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Now that I can build because I have a working compiler (sorry for the
noise :-) I would like to look into my favorite feature patches. I use
patch-0.00.sec.patchlist.7
patch-0.95.4.sec.expand_hook.1
[...]
Can the
On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 11:33:34AM +0100, Dirk Huebner wrote:
Hi all,
this is no mutt-specific question, but I'm sure so can give me a
hint here.
I would like to examine my existing mail and create a statistic
about "mails from user per day"
For example: Search for "dirk.g.huebner"
On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 05:39:26PM +0100, Jens Tautenhahn wrote:
[...]
to decode email-adresses like
"Harry =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=FCter?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I've added a 'total' output at the end, lowercasing of the Adresses, and
an optional command line parameter to output only matching adresses.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 09:38:22AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Having said this, I saw one feature in TheBat that I'd like to see Mutt
have someday: the ability to create and use templates for new messages,
replies, forwarded messages, etc.
Definitely. Especially for my administrative
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 02:02:23PM +0530, Mrinal Kalakrishnan wrote:
I was wondering if there is a feature by which, when I reply to, say
this mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), the `To:' line should become
the whole name and address from my alias file - i.e. `The Mutt Users
List [EMAIL
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 06:07:25PM -0500, Jeremy wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 01:08:50PM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
* Jeremy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [991121 08:46]:
I just upgraded to 1.1.1. Previously, if a mail contained attachments
(which require mailcap to view) they would have an M next
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 11:02:52PM +0200, Ralf Orlowski wrote:
My charset is set to iso-8859-1. But if I receive a mail with
german letters like äöüß in it, this letters always just shown as
? in the pager.
Can someone tell me, if I´ve missed a setting I could change, so that
the pager is
On Tue, Sep 07, 1999 at 10:42:30AM +0100, Axel Tillequin wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to have a shell command run each time mutt is opened.
like if just after mutt comes up, i'd pressed ':command'
I think you mean '!command' (at least in the default keymap)
If you want mutt to do something
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 01:08:00PM +0200, Maciej Majchrowski wrote:
There is a standrard bind such as:
bind index m 'mail'
I want to make something like this:
bind index M 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mail'
But I doesn't work at all :-(
use a macro to do more
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 07:12:20PM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
Nope...tried both and both still act under default folder-hook rules.
Nice try...other ideas?
I use
folder-hook =Listen/mutt- "set strict_threads"
Where '=' is short for $folder which is set to ~/Mail usually
And that works
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 12:38:05AM +0200, Martin Maciaszek wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 05:28:31PM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
Where the `yes` is coming from unless you configured it that way, I have
no idea...
I tried running yes from the command line. It just spits out
endless lines with
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 06:29:07PM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
So why won't it match on ~/folders/funnies ??
Maybe mutt doesn't expand ~ correctly ? Maybe try the full path (or
$HOME) instead?
CU,
Sec
--
"Oderint dum metuant. Let them hate so long as they fear."
-- Lucius Accius (170-90
On Fri, Aug 13, 1999 at 02:51:27AM -0230, Chris Gushue wrote:
I have a problem with Mutt and two headers I am defining, X-Uptime and
X-Yoda (see my headers for more). Currently, it seems that Mutt will
only add these headers when it starts, and not when I send a message. I
have tried using a
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 08:26:40PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 12:56:14PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
This is a feature of the underlying Exchange protocol. SMTP has no such
feature.
Hmm, but couldn't mutt support this feature?
And now, for your amusement,
Hi,
first of all, please adhere to that 70 characters/line limit mail
usually uses. I've take the freedom to reformat your mail.
On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 12:44:38PM +0200, Peter Poeml wrote:
Hi folks,
I am successfully using mutt on AIX, with a strange problem though.
In intervals of
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 03:31:00PM +0200, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
hello
When i had wrote the following into my .muttrc
folder-hook sent/ set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15t (%4l) %s"
it's a quoting problem. use this:
folder-hook sent/ 'set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d}
On Wed, Jul 21, 1999 at 03:12:44PM +0200, Salvatore Greco wrote:
Good day all,
I upgraded from 0.93 and I used to type mutt -y and get a list of folders that
I could easily monitor. When I went into the a folder, and I pressed "i" to
get to the index again - it used to show the same index
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 05:34:03PM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
What was the value of PidListLen?
(gdb) print PidListLen
$1 = 2
Hopefully the following patch fixes the problem (removed a race
condition, please try to repeat your conditions ;-) ...
I will use your later patch. I fear I
On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 03:42:00PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Hello,
It's highly probable I'm missing something somewhere, but
it seems to me that if mutt is invoked via 'mutt -y' (with
"mailboxes" defined in .muttrc), once you select a mailbox
to work with,
On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 11:58:20AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
You keep thinking it's a slang problem -- it is not. The
problem is not entirely slang, nor is it entirely ncurses.
This is a very common thing in the "free software world."
Blaming someone else for
I just noticed a somewhat strange behavior of .95.6 which .95.5 did not
have.
Scenario: Take a Mailbox with several Mails marked as new. Position on
the first one, press ENTER, and read all of them with TAB until you get
taken beack to the index.
With .95.5 you would now be on the message you
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 08:59:17AM -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
% #!/bin/sh
% echo j$HOME/.jay
% cat $HOME/.jay| tr -d \\012
Couldn't you simply
#!/bin/sh
echo -n j $HOME/.jay
and be done with it?
no, mutt needs an \n at the end. And If i start playing around wirth a
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 09:13:11AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan `Sec` Zehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
suggested:
macro index I "c=TabTab`echo -n j$HOME/.jay;cat $HOME/.jay`"
This does not seem to be incrementing in .jay. I think probably
these shell commands are only exe
On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 12:03:35PM -0700, brian moore wrote:
It's still verifying it just fine, just being noisy and telling you that
it's a detached signature.
It's just the nature of PGP5 to behave that way.
Is there any way to filter these messages or to tell PGP to shut up?
On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 10:13:48PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I did was try this macro:
macro index I "c=TabTab`JAY=j$JAY ; echo $JAY`"
I exported JAY through all my initialization files for my login
and inter/active shells, but it still doesn't work.
I think this won't work
On Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 05:15:09PM -0700, Russell Van Tassell wrote:
[..]
set signature="/usr/bin/cat /usr/home/russell/.signature |"
However, if you wanted to extend that to a send-hook, it barfs -- all of
the following fail:
send-hook . set signature="/usr/bin/cat
On Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 06:09:00PM +0200, Renaud Colinet wrote:
Hmm, mutt complains at startup: no such menu
I tried 'postponed' instead of 'postpone' (the former seems more likely from
what I read in the manual), but I get the same message.
I wonder if it recognizes this menu (maybe a
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 08:54:27AM -0700, Russell Van Tassell wrote:
Stupid question: how the heck do I "unlimit" a limit command?
Normally, I tend to like to limit message down to a certain pattern
and view just those messages (to make sure I've gotten it right) and
then perform a
On Mon, Apr 26, 1999 at 12:48:46PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
Stephen Maher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want mutt to automatically delete messages that I save. Seems
simple, but after a couple of runs through the docs I still haven't
found a way to do it.
Um... Mutt always deletes
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 06:38:17PM -0700, Robert Chien wrote:
This is good, but wouldn't it be more intuitive to show me all messages
when the limit is blank? developers, would you consider this?
We had this discussion already. I then wrote a patch to do this (for
.89 - you could get it from
On Sun, Apr 11, 1999 at 11:58:13AM +0200, Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
Probably i am just too dumb to read but i didn't find the solution
after looking at the manual.
Any hints?
As someone else said, you have to set 'ispell' to the correct value,
then execute the ispell function. I have the
On Sat, Apr 10, 1999 at 04:22:14PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
folder-hook . set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%4l) %s"
folder-hook mua set index_format="%3C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15F (%3l) %s"
folder-hook sla set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15F (%4l) %s"
You can't
On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 12:44:03PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
Why the fuss, you say? Well.. this .lists file is also in my
QMAILMFTFILE env.variable, which means qmail-inject will send my
Mail-Followup-To to these mailinglists when I mail to any of them.
Mutt sould add the
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 09:08:11PM -0700, Elad the Etarip wrote:
It appears that Mutt doesn't forget folder-hook's, once they've
been used, but keeps using them for each folder I access after that, in other
words the folder-hooks appear to be sticky, when they shouldn't be.
No.
On Tue, Apr 06, 1999 at 12:28:26AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My apologies, I know this subject was treated a while ago, but I lost the
mail which had this reference. I mean a pointer to a URL on info about
compressed mail folders with Mutt; could anyone refresh my mind, please?
The
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 11:56:50AM +0200, Renaud Colinet wrote:
Reply-To:
Hi,
You should keep a blank line between the headers and your mail.
when i 'group-reply' to a message, mutt doesn't remove me from the recipients
list, though the 'metoo' variable is not set. Is there any particular
On Sun, Mar 28, 1999 at 11:30:50AM +0200, Rejo wrote:
I did what you recommended. What i have now is this:
--begin
send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:'
send-hook . 'unmy_hdr Reply-To:'
[other send-hooks like the following two]
send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'my_hdr From: Rejo
[EMAIL
On Sun, Mar 28, 1999 at 05:20:19PM +0200, Rejo wrote:
Eeuh... i think i have the problem. Your solution does work, but when i
inserted your lines i accedently deleted on of the excisting lines. And
then it is of no wonder things do no longer work as expected. Sorry
about that. :-(
I'm glad
On Sun, Mar 28, 1999 at 06:47:42PM -0500, Ayman Haidar wrote:
as you know when you reply to a message, by default the signature will
be appended to the end of the quoted message.
This is correct.
is there a way to append it to the beginning of the message, so you can
type your hole message
I just updated from 0.95 to 0.95.4 and now auto-view doesn't work like
it used to.
I have the following line in my .mailcap:
image/gif; xv %s; x-mozilla-flags=internal
On a Mail which contains only a body of image/gif (and no text at all)
Mutt displayed an 'M' besides the mail and displayed it
On Tue, Mar 23, 1999 at 08:34:39AM -0500, Vikas Agnihotri wrote:
set implicit_autoview
should do what you want, IIRC.
Hm, thanks, but that only seems to be half of it.
Now I get the error message:
mailcap entry for type image/gif not found
(and yes, it is in my .mailcap mutt-0.95 still
On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 04:09:22PM +, Einar Indridason wrote:
Yes, I was looking for an easy way within mutt to "this message will expire
at this time in the future" without having to manually mess with the
'Expire: ' header. (I'm still looking :-)
You could pipe it through a small
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 12:39:20PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
However, the potential
saving of messages multiple times is annoying, still, and will not be
infrequent in really busy mailboxes. However, I don't want to do this
whole operation
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 09:55:23PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
Maybe I should start using group-reply at all times, but that gives the
old dupe-message problem, solved only if the remote users uses Mutt (or
some sort of de-duping agent; most don't).
not completely correct. Mutt uses
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 12:49:01PM -0500, Vikas Agnihotri wrote:
If someone sends me a mail containing the sequence "\n.\n" i.e. it
happens to contain a line having only a '.', the mail gets chopped off
at that point i.e. my external ATT MTA treats the '.' as end-of-mail.
If I remember that
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 09:00:53PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] _-cursor here
If you type ", [EMAIL PROTECTED]" it works fine. But if you simple type
another e-mail address, like "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", the Cc: list is
truncated to simply:
Cc: [EMAIL
51 matches
Mail list logo
