On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, PeterKorman wrote:
> This is *really* nice. I saw the page at http://w3m.org a
> few months ago. I wrongly concluded that there was no on-going
> development since the date on w3m.org is:
>
> Tuesday August 01, 2000 02:43 P
>
> Your reference to http://w3m.sf.net cleared my c
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Andre Berger wrote:
> Alternatively you could you use links version 2; both w3m and links
> support ssl and pictures!, but none of them JavaScript (at least to
lynx supports ssl as well.
> my best knowledge). Netrik is said to support JavaScript but thinks
as a matter of fa
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, D. J. Bolderman wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Oct 2002, Robert Ian Smit wrote:
>
> > > Subject says it all: if I'm using Mutt over an ssh connection, how can I
> > > execute http links in mails ? Or is this simply not possible ?
>
> > By executing http links you mean starting a graphica
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 the mental interface of
> Thomas Dickey told:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 09:13:27AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Default Red Hat 7.3 uses Galeon to read html email in mutt.
> > >
> > > Where do I change this to lynx??
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Oct 2002 the mental interface of
>
> "Or you can have vim do this reformatting automatically by applying
> patches 6.1.142 and 6.1.143 and adding this to your autocmd:
>
> set formatoptions+=a"
> (posted at vim.vim.org!)
I don't use
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, kevin lyda wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:09:47AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> > > Not sure about vi, but vim has a wonderful method of wrapping text. A
> > > simple Q} will wrap the whole p
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002, Mike Jackson wrote:
> > If I receive a message from an outlook luser, or similar, and the
> > message is completely unwrapped, how do I "fix" that part which I quote?
> > I would like to be able to do this automatically.
>
> Not su
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> On Sep 27 at 11:28, Chris Green spoke:
>
> > Error in /home/chris/.mutt/muttrc, line 28: default: no such color
>
> Mutt (ncurses?) on NetBsd doesn't like this either.
>
> If you have a light background you might choose `brightwhite'
> instead. T
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Tue 2002-09-24 at 15:36:49 +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> > I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> > for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> > mails that happen upon my inbox - what
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Eric Smith wrote:
> bill luecke said:
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> >
> > I have the following line in my .mailcap
> >
> > text/html; unhtml ; copiousoutput
>
> good answer - apt-get install unhtml on debian
>
> But it is still almost a sec
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Eric Smith wrote:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
someone commented on "lynx -dump" r
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > From: "Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: vi startup (not vim?)
> > Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 12:36:55 -0400 (EDT)
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PRO
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 15:33]:
> > > > one of the annoying things about vim-users is that most
> > > > of them don't know much about vi, and tend to ascribe
> > >
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, darren chamberlain wrote:
> * Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 09:04]:
> > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, darren chamberlain wrote:
> >
> > > vim has a :version command, which other vi clones don't seem to; vim
> >
> > :v
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, darren chamberlain wrote:
> vim has a :version command, which other vi clones don't seem to; vim
:ve is standard.
(:version is also recognized by all of the vi's that I recall -
including elvis).
> with cp set will still respond to :version, while elvis will not (well,
> it
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 01:16:16PM +0200, Thomas Baker wrote:
> > I use Mutt 1.4i in Cygwin so do not have access to Urlview.
> > Previous mail to this list regarding alternatives to Urlview
> > have recommended w3m and lynx, and I have had some success
>
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Thomas E. Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > my impression (haven't seen any comments that this is fixed yet) is that
> > the slang UTF-8 package doesn't work for line-drawing characters. There
> > were some patche
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas E. Dickey told:
> > I haven't made one. Perhaps it's about time. This topic comes up
> > occasionally, and since I'm in the process of checking the pre-release,
&
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas E. Dickey told:
> > otoh, ncursesw does support Unicode/UTF-8 line-drawing...
> >
> > perhaps it would be simpler to just patch mutt to add the extra places to
>
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I compiled unpatched sources from mutt.org against slang. This was
> to have a full background colored headerline! But now I can not view
> the pager with ACS trees. I have to switch to "set ascii_chars" in
> muttrc.
my impression (hav
On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, John P Verel wrote:
> On 07/25/02 19:05 -0400, John P Verel wrote:
> > I cannot get my numeric keypad to work with Mutt. Here's my
> > environment:
>
> > The numeric keypad works correctly within gnome-terminal (e.g. writing
> > code), works fine within mutt, if run from xte
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * V K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-21 06:54]:
> > Funny, even just about every GNU app supports
> > readline() and cmdline editing. I have come
> > to think of it as state of the art, or standard.
>
> * On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 01:00:31PM +0200, Sven Gucke
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > the same as before: the 'screen' terminfo which has no 'bce' capability.
>
> So, a couple of things about that, if you don't mind:
>
> 1. Perhaps you wouldn't mind explaining the relevance. _Is_ Background
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, darren chamberlain wrote:
> I get:
>
> $ echo "ctrl-v f1" | perl -lpe '$_ = join " ", unpack("c*", $_)'
> 27 79 80
> $ echo "ctrl-v ctrl-F1" | perl -lpe '$_ = join " ", unpack("c*", $_)'
> 27 79 53 80
>
> I'm using a happy hacking keyboard, which might make a differenc
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Maximilian Szengel wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 09:46:30AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 01:41:55PM +0200, Maximilian Szengel wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've just edited my mutt colors to have a white background. (color
> > > normal black whit
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Fernando Schapachnik wrote:
> > % 2) When I switched from KDE 2 to KDE 3, threads indicators in Konsole
> > % started to look strange, any ideas?
is that mutt linked with ncurses, or slang?
(I've noticed some discussion to the effect that the UTF-8 flavor of slang
on Debian
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Andy Saxena wrote:
> > generally it _cannot_ detect whether the background is light or dark.
>
> Hmmm... so what would the solution be in this case? Should I always use
> a dark background? I guess if I had to choose between a dark and a light
> background, I'd be more inclin
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> My C is pretty weak but
>
> execl (EXECSHELL, "sh", "-c", cmd, NULL);
>
> looks odd when I know EXECSHELL is /usr/local/bin/zsh.
>
> I'm not quite sure what this does, it looks like it specifies the
> path /usr/local/bin/zsh but then invokes i
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it me or does the Shell Command function use /bin/sh
> to execute commands regardless of the value of my SHELL
> variable?
>
> For example, I start mutt with
>
> SHELL=/usr/local/bin/zsh mutt
>
> and then run !ps -p $$
if mutt's u
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> If you like putty and want a REALLY nice ssh client, check out
> SecureCRT from VanDyke. www.vandyke.com . For Windows I really
> couldn't ask for more, and VanDyke is a perfect example of how a
> company should be run.
I tested it a few months ago (t
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
> I wanted to ask about this before but forgot... Are you sure it's
> cygwin's and not Win's? Where is telnet if you do a "which"?
cygwin dll implements a terminal emulator inside M$'s console window.
(running bash in the window makes the terminal emulator
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * "Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-16 15:45:37 -0400]:
> > On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > > PS: using FreeBSD 4.5 with a termcap entry based on xterm-color.
> >
> >
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-16 20:58:08 +0200]:
> > Nicolas Rachinsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > > * Eduardo Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-16 14:07:07 -0300]:
> > > > i'm not right on the mutt box. I'm connected throu
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, darren chamberlain wrote:
> As a professional perl programmer, I have to say that I've found vim to
> be the least deficient in parsing perl syntax. Better than Emacs'
> cperl-mode (not a flame, and observation!) and light year's better than
> anything else (have you how atro
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, David T-G wrote:
> % And now all Solaris-users can enjoy the MS Outlook
> % Express-experience ;-)
> %
> % http://www.microsoft.com/unix/ie/evaluation/outlookexp/default.asp
> ...
> %
> % * Outlook Express is easy to set up and use, and provides you with
> % secure, personali
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
> * Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-22 10:28:35 -0500]:
>
> > On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
> >
> > > I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
> > > prog
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> > I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
> > programmable via slang.
>
> possibly - but I've only seen it mentioned as a possibility that could
> be developed rather than an accomplishe
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
> * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 23:13:28 +0100]:
>
> > * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 16:49]:
> >
> > > [SNIP scripting in mutt would be nice]
> >
> > [SNIP Sven swears in public]
> >
> > Sven [slang, anyone?]
>
> I seem
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hi, Thomas!
>
> > > I've compiled mutt-1.3.28i in the default configuration on RedHat Linux
> > > 7.2 (i386) with all updates. If I run it in xterm (from XFree86-4.1.0) or
> > > in rxvt-2.7.6, it shows a blank screen. I can quit by pressing Ctrl-C and
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hi, Thomas!
>
> > > I've compiled mutt-1.3.28i in the default configuration on RedHat Linux
> > > 7.2 (i386) with all updates. If I run it in xterm (from XFree86-4.1.0) or
> > > in rxvt-2.7.6, it shows a blank screen. I can quit by pressing Ctrl-C and
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> Where does 'default' come from, as whether it gets recognized or not?
for ncurses, it's implemented by the use_default_colors() function.
If the configure script doesn't find that, it won't compile-in the
support for "default" into mutt.
> I ended up i
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, David Champion wrote:
> On 2002.03.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Ken Weingold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oh, cool. So the following means that mutt doesn't need any of the
> > ncurses libraries at all after the binary is built?
> >
> > ./mutt:
> > -lintl
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2002, David Champion wrote:
> > Run "ldd mutt". This will tell you what shared dependencies the binary
> > has (including whether it used the shared or static libs from your
> > ncurses build).
>
> Oh, cool. So the following means that m
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
> Simon White wrote:
> >
> > Since it's dynamic, he'll have to be running a web server, etc. A
> > shell or PERL script will guarantee functionality across a wider range
> > of Linux distros and setups.
>
> and other operating systems; mutt runs on a number
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > I have finally moved all the news items about mutt
> > from my main page about mutt to an extra page.
>
> * Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020306 13:41]:
> > perhaps you
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
> P.S. I could make screenshots if anybody would want to see what's
> happening...
more useful would be a typescript (from running mutt within 'script').
--
T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> I have finally moved all the news items about mutt
> from my main page about mutt to an extra page.
> So now you can bookmark it and have NetMind send
> you an update notice when the page changes.
> further news welcome, of course. :-)
perhaps you should
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > # Reconstructed via infocmp from file: /usr/lib/terminfo/r/rxvt
> > rxvt|rxvt terminal emulator (X Window System),
> > am, bce, eo, km, mir, msgr, xenl, xon,
> ...
>
> Ah yes, I see. I must have misread the infocmp man page. But the
> "
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> I have been using mutt in an rxvt window with a background xpm
> for a long time, using the version from the SuSE distribution
> withouth compilling myself. Since SuSE 7.2 however, rxvt covers
> the background image with a black character background its
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> * Thomas E. Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Mike Schiraldi wrote:
> >
> > > > Anyone else using Mutt on solaris that has a fix for this? I'm using
> > > > Solaris 8 for x86 (w
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Mike Schiraldi wrote:
> > Anyone else using Mutt on solaris that has a fix for this? I'm using
> > Solaris 8 for x86 (which is now discontinued so I hope to switch it to
> > Linux sometime in the future, but for now, I have to do it this way).
>
> As a first step, take a look
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Dale Morris wrote:
> I've changed over from Redhat 7.2 to Slackware 8.0. In slack
> I'm using the standard kernel 2.2.19. I'm using mutt 1.2.1-1
> and a modified .muttrc from Roland Rosenfeld site. It worked
> fine in Redhat but in slack I have a problem.
"xterm" normally doe
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Said Charles Jie on Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 12:46:17AM +0800:
>
> > 1. The file manager Konqueror is not mature (crash so oftern)
>
> If it crashes, then your setup has issues. It has been stable for
>
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> yesterday I switched back from aterm (TERM=xterm-color) to rxvt
> (TERM=rxvt). I had some problems with display in mutt, and during the
> attempts to solve it I upgraded to 1.3.26i (don't use SSL, so I don't
> care about the bug).
>
> It
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Mike Schiraldi wrote:
> > Mh... I trusted you on that patch, and didn't observe any adverse
> > effects myself. ;-)
>
> Actually, after further review, this appears to be a bug dating all the way
> back at least as far as mutt 1.2.5.
>
> Try opening an xterm with the command
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
> Thomas Dickey wrote:
> [this is getting OT, so it might be nicest to continue this discussion
> off list if necessary]
>
> > I had in mind (having forgotten that FreeBSD has a not-invented-here
> > mentality) that they'd implemented a copy of the GNU 'ls
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, David T-G wrote:
> Sam --
>
> ...and then Samuel Padgett said...
> %
> % darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> %
> % > In vim:
> % >
> % > set titleold=My\ Old\ Xterm\ Title
> % >
> % > and it will restore the xterm's title to that string.
> %
> % Yes, but I'd li
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Preben Randhol wrote:
> "Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/01/2002 (20:31) :
> > tsk, tsk (you should go back and read the paragraph to which you
> > responded)
>
> Yes I have done it 3 times and I don't understand
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Preben Randhol wrote:
> "Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/01/2002 (19:11) :
>
> > You're not responding to his question. (w3m doesn't do javascript
>
> No I didn't say it did. I just said w3m is better than
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (22:12) :
> > You can't. It's rude anyway. The amount of time you spend trimming stuff
> > to just the relevant stuff is _more_ than outweghed by the time saved
> > to the list members as a whole,
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Well, FWIW, I'm pretty sure he's talking about his own vendor's mutt
> package ("port" is a BSD-ism, right?). Regular Mutt still defaults to
> ncurses, and there's certainly no mention of the above text in Mutt's
> Makefile.
generally (you're correct
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:18:19PM -0500, Jack Baty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After installing from the port, colors are no longer working properly using
> > Putty. By not working I mean that it seems the foreground and background
> > colors ar
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 06:20:00AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> > > Any ideas on what the problem is and how to fix it ? I am using xterm-color
> > > on a BSD box ssh'd from Linux. The $display_filter is attached.
> >
> > "TERM=xterm-color" will alway
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
It won't work (the older wchar_t is a short, not a long). I experimented
recently with that sort of combination with lynx and concluded that you
can't make libiconv work properly there (you can build it, but it won't
run). But unlike mutt, lynx at least d
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> lynx produces footnotes for every HREF link, but it doesn't work well
> in an utf-8 environment.
I ought to write a lynx faq... (the utf-8 stuff works well enough with
current code compiled against libncursesw).
--
T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Cristian wrote:
> Hi Stephan!
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:38:45AM +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> > Strange, never w3m nor lynx can correctly display
> > http://fsing.fs.uni-sb.de/~stse/manga.html. But w3mmee does.
>
> Plain w3m had wide character support only the for Japane
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Dave Price wrote:
> It is ncurses:
> Mutt 1.3.23i (2001-10-09)
> System: Linux 2.2.19 [using ncurses 5.2]
I'll have to try building 1.3.23i and see if I can spot the problem (when
I'm at home). I did build one or two of the 1.3.x series, but just to
check on progress...
--
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Dave Price wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 05:58:02AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > > I tried you colors, and those object where default is specified as the
> > > background, the aterm background shows thru - everything else - the
> > > message body, and the main index back
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, René Clerc wrote:
> * Prahlad Vaidyanathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20-11-2001 15:36]:
>
> | Hi,
> |
> | Finally got around to updating it :
> |
> | http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/mutt.html
> |
> | Feedback ?
>
> Looks nice! You could consider adding the text-based browser
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Paul Ackersviller wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 10:03:08PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> > I'll accept that. I'd call it the GUI version of mutt :-) While I see
> > that as a logical evolution, I don't see it happening; mutt runs happily
> > in a GUI (as you point out) termin
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:54:42 -0500 (EST)
> > From: "Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: R
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > what was $TERM before you set rxvt.termName ?
>
> just xterm.
"xterm" is usually the same as "xterm-r6" (no color).
(but "xterm-color" isn't correct - would be nice if FreeBSD installed the
correct termcap entries so this wasn't something I had
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > did you use curses/ncurses or slang?
> > rxvt sets $COLORTERM, which is used by slang to circumvent the normal
> > setting of $TERM.
>
> I have installed mutt from the port with the default settings.
> Looking in the makefile doesn't reveal a
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> If xterm-color is incorrect, what should the value be?
> BTW, 1.2.5 displayed colors in rxvt without this hack,
> 1.3.23i didn't display colors until I put
> rxtv.termName = xterm-color in my .Xdefaults.
did you use curses/ncurses or sl
On 1 Nov 2001, John J Kearney wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, René Clerc wrote:
>
> > * John J Kearney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-10-2001 19:01]:
> >
> > | please can sombody tell me how to enable colors in mutt
> > | i have a color xterm and vim has colors in it
> > | what must i do for mutt ot work
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Daniel Farnsworth Teichert wrote:
> When I was first messing around with Mutt I had similar
> troubles when trying to use a regular old xterm. It
> seems like I found that setting the environment variable
> TERM to color_xterm instead of just xterm made it work.
> Calling xte
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
> Aye, actually had time to investigate this over the weekend and found
> the offending stuff in mutt's configure script - for the use_default_color
> checks it only includes curses.h - now on NetBSD this only exists in
> /usr/include for system curses
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, David T-G wrote:
> In vim:
>
> vim filename
> :set fileformat=unix
> :wq
vile filename
:set-u
:wq
>
> Ta-daa! Even easier than the :%s magic available in any vi or clone.
--
T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, David T-G wrote:
> Hall, Miguel, et al --
>
> ...and then Hall Stevenson said...
> % > quite awkward, and I'd rather remap it to Shift-Tab.
> % However, I can't
> % > find a way to define this key combination. What am I
> % missing?
> %
> % What do you mean 'define this key c
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 19:18:19 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > but as I said before, you can get what you're looking for by modifying the
> > terminfo description. there's no need to modify the C code.
>
> But then, this will break the applications
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Adam Shostack wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 07:30:40PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> > % I just upgraded to mutt 1.2.5, and its insisting on coloring
> > % everything. I managed to get close to what I want by commenting
> >
> > Heh :-)
> >
> >
> > % HAVE_COLOR out of config.h
On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, Ken Weingold wrote:
> I built mutt with ncurses 5.0, and just updated ncurses to 5.2. Any
> reason to recompile mutt?
perhaps (with 5.1/5.2, I added a function assume_default_colors(),
which you may want to configure against if you weren't using the
default colors support i
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Nate Johnston wrote:
> All,
>
> I apologize if this has been discussed and I missed it, but I recently
> upgraded to 1.3.19i. When I did so, the "default" color seems to have
> disappeared. I get about 20 of these errors:
>
> Error in /home/nate/.muttrc, line 243: default: n
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Ken Weingold wrote:
> Does anyone know of any sites with tutorials on the basics of writing
> patches? I would like to modify an older patch, but need some
> basic direction on what I am looking at.
none needed:
apply the older patch to current baseline (look at .re
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> When the "markers" and "smart_wrap" options are both off, it would
> be nice if mutt would print long lines to the screen without a
> newline. This way, if I copy the line in an xterm, the whole line
> goes into the cut buffer unbroken. As it is, I ge
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
> Is that problem with autoconf 2.50 in general or just the one that`s
> shipping with slackware?
in general (2.51 is worse - they've succumbed to featuritis).
--
T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I`ve been forced to downgrade from mutt 1.3.19 to mutt 1.2.5 since I
> installed Slackware 8.0, I keep getting the following error with
> ncurses:
look at the config.log file, which shows the error messages. Perhaps
sl80's got
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> text/html; links %s; needsterminal; nametemplate=%s.html
> in /etc/termcap works just fine for me.
perhaps /etc/mailcap
--
T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach »Thomas Dickey« am 2001-07-19 19.07.2001 um 17:53:27 -0400 :
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 11:09:24PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > > So sprach »Juha Saarinen« am 2001-07-20 20.07.2001 um 09:02:05 +1200 :
> > > > Links is quite good... doe
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Fox Mulder wrote:
> * Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21:42 18/07/01]:
> >
> > a good place to start is www.google.com (search for "xterm")
> >
> > as I point out 2-3 times a week, "xterm-color" is incorrect for XFre
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Andre Wyrwa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have the problem of having a non-colored mutt, when starting it in
> xterm. $TERM is "xterm".
> When I change $TERM to "linux" or "xterm-color" mutt will start with
> colors.
> So I guess it has something to do with terminfo. Unfortunately I
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Chris Fuchs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can I know for certain whether color is supported on
> version 6.1 of exceed run on NT? I live on xterm sessions which
> access a solaris box (Sunos 5.5.1) and color would be nice.
>
> This works:
> mono header bold Subject:
>
> This doesn't:
ons, but mutt should be configured to
> | call 'use_default_colors()' - you can verify that with 'nm' on mutt. If it's
> | configured properly, then the color scheme in .muttrc is the place to look (if
> | it uses "default" in the background rather t
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Jim Lambert wrote:
one or the other of your terminal definitions has 'bce' set or disabled
incorrectly.
> I used to run mutt on Solaris (which I think uses SLang or ncurses)
> and background colors went all the way across the screen when did
> something like this, in my mutt
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Hanif Ladha [4355] wrote:
> Dear Muttophiles,
>
> I am in search for an ideal (yep very subjective i know) 'xterm' that will let
> me to setup pretty colours for mutt/vim combination.
>
> I am running Solaris 8 on a Ultrasparc 5 (very nice machine BTW), alas it only
> has a 4
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
> * On Mon Apr 16 2001, Robert T.G. Tan screamed:
>
> -> I've entered some colors in my .muttrc file, but they don't
> -> show up in Eterm, a color monitor I'm using.
> ->
> -> So what's up with that?
> ->
> -> Tnx, rotan.
>
> Check the $TERM var. It
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Dave Pearson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 06:01:28AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 08:24:14AM +0100, Dave Pearson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 08:12:41AM +0100, Dave Pearson wrote:
> > >
> > > > If that's what you're after perhaps you coul
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Wayne Chapeskie wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 07:35:01AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> >
> > > % pre-compiled binaries?
> >
> > > ... but I'd like to encourage you to make your binaries available for the
> > > next guy :-)
> >
> > Speaking of that, I do have
colors).
>
> I have tried to export vt100 and linux, but I am getting the same issue.
> When I compose a message, though, the window is transparent. I am
> confused.
>
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 05:56:24AM -0500, Thomas E. Dickey muttered:
> | On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Jason Hel
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Jason Helfman wrote:
> Today I applied updates for my Debian box, running Sid, or unstable. So
> Ncurses was updated, and when running mutt in an Eterm, before I could
> get a transparent Eterm with mutt. But now mutt runs a standard looking
> black/white term. I guess this is
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
