* munk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-13 20:03]:
Is there a test mailing list I can use to check
I have various settings in mutt setup correctly?
www.yahoogroups.com - hint hint!
Sven
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 03:20:34AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* munk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-13 20:03]:
Is there a test mailing list I can use to check
I have various settings in mutt setup correctly?
www.yahoogroups.com - hint hint!
Sven
memeep, thanx sven :)
Main reason
i.e. on USAGI mailing list) when composing subjects for replying and when
threading.
Hmm, I use a kind of a blacklist in procmail which deletes all
[listname] stuff in subjects lines of a mailing list. It seems
quite usefull when dealing with ugly things like:
[listname]Re: [listname]...
One
Hi Christopher,
How might one go about fixing this on my end? I have a feeling that
a procmail recipe that uses a sed filter for the Subject: line might
do the trick. Can anyone suggest a recipe, or perhaps a simpler
mutt-centric solution?
you might try something like this:
#
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:15:12AM -0800, Christopher Swingley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mutters,
One of the mailing lists I subscribe to uses the Lyris ListManager
software, which attaches '[listname]' to the Subject: line of all
the messages send out. Unlike most list manager software
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:15:12AM -0800, Christopher Swingley wrote:
Mutters,
One of the mailing lists I subscribe to uses the Lyris ListManager
software, which attaches '[listname]' to the Subject: line of all
the messages send out. Unlike most list manager software, which
puts the 'Re
Christopher Swingley wrote:
So does this mean that the decoding I mentioned above would need to be
built into mutt? I don't know how much one-off kludging there is
inside mutt to fix non-standard behavior in other parts of the email
conversation, but this one probably wouldn't be too hard
On 14/05/02 Christopher Swingley did speaketh:
I hate Lyris. Lyris is so nonstandard that one would think it was a
Microsoft in-house project.
I'm right there with you.
Me too. They set up Lyris in-house here, and I've ignored the project and
put up my own GNU Mailman server instead.
Hi,
Is there a test mailing list I can use to check I have various settings in mutt setup
correctly?
Thanks in advance,
Jez
--
http://munkboxen.mine.nu - FreeBSD network
http://www.freebsd.org
Jez --
...and then munk said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% Is there a test mailing list I can use to check I have various settings in mutt
setup correctly?
Well, you've used this one, so I guess there you go. Next time send mail
to yourself or to a pal instead of all of us :-)
%
% Thanks
are for mailing lists, for example, at this mailing list I
use [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I reply to the list I have to
manually type in the address that the mail was sent to.
folder-hook FOO 'my_hdr From: Patrick Draper [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
send-hook listaddress 'my_hdr From: Patrick Draper
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 02:16:47PM -0400, Mike Schiraldi wrote:
(the mail would end up in my inbox instead of the list folder).
That should not happen. What does, say, your mutt-users procmail recipe look
like?
Mine's:
:0 H
* ^TO.*@mutt.org
mutt/
As I'm mostly only listening I use
Hi, all --
...and then s. keeling said...
%
% - Kibo probably already has the fix implemented.
There he is! I knew it would come to this soon :-)
It's fun, though!
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live
Akkana --
...and then Akkana said...
%
...
% Mike Schiraldi writes:
...
% the request is for a command which will initiate a reply to A list but not
% Alice.
%
% Exactly!
...
%
% So I gather that mutt currently has no way of doing this. If I add
Yup.
% one, is there any chance it might
Dan --
...and then Dan Lowe said...
%
...
% Don't tell me the list has more than one address... do I need to have
% multiple subscribe lines for it? Ugh.
While it only has one correct address, sometimes the gbnet address leaks
through. You probably don't want to subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED
% Don't tell me the list has more than one address... do I need to have
% multiple subscribe lines for it? Ugh.
While it only has one correct address, sometimes the gbnet address leaks
through. You probably don't want to subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED],
though, because you'd only
How does this delete the personal copy, but not the list copy?
Both messages will have the same Message-ID field in the header.
Correct answer, but to the question how does it recognise duplicates.
I should have been more specific - what I meant was: how does it delete
the personal copy
, or are you
going to reply to the list?
Once you're on enough lists, sorting them into proper contains (folders)
becomes important. I, like many, use Procmail for that. I don't use the
Message-ID trick to delete duplicates; I used to, but I had to stop because
it kept deleting the wrong
(the mail would end up in my inbox instead of the list folder).
That should not happen. What does, say, your mutt-users procmail recipe look
like?
Mine's:
:0 H
* ^TO.*@mutt.org
mutt/
(plus a few others, for guug.de and gbnet.net messages too)
If you were to send a message to both me
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 02:16:47PM -0400, Mike Schiraldi wrote:
(the mail would end up in my inbox instead of the list folder).
That should not happen. What does, say, your mutt-users procmail recipe look
like?
Mine's:
:0 H
* ^TO.*@mutt.org
mutt/
Isn't that supposed to be * ^TO_
don't use the
Message-ID trick to delete duplicates; I used to, but I had to stop becau=
se
it kept deleting the wrong copy, as described in this thread (the mail
would end up in my inbox instead of the list folder).
There's a very simple fix, here. In your procmail rules, stop using
--R+My9LyyhiUvIEro
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Mike Schiraldi spake thus:
That should not happen. What does, say, your mutt-users procmail recipe l=
ook
like?
=20
Mine's:
=20
:0 H
* ^TO.*@mutt.org
Alas! Mike Schiraldi spake thus:
I'm
not sure what kind of procmail voodoo you would need to grab this
information from Delivered-To and fulfill the user's request, but it would
be weird and scary.
You're so simple-minded. All you have to do is set up a temporal anomaly
in which procmail
duplicate), well worth the wait.
- Kibo probably already has the fix implemented.
Simpler is to ignore what was done in the past. Decide what you will
do in the future. Now, we can all go out and hunt down and kill those
miscreants who reply to the author and cc: the list. And you thought
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote s. keeling thusly...
- _Something_ doesn't show you new mail 'til a few days after it
arrives ('cause you have to wait for possible duplicates to
arrive). Inconvenient, but for those who can't stand seeing
duplicates (or the wrong
Shawn McMahon writes:
IMHO, if you hit list-reply and Mutt doesn't recognize a list, it
should assume you know what you're talking about, and pop up the To:
address as a yes/no default. Then if you say no, it should cycle
through the Cc: addresses until you say yes or q.
Alternately, just
my .muttrc to tell it
about every mailing list I might ever subscribe to. (I sub/unsub
to lots of lists and it's a chore to keep .muttrc up to date.)
Is there a way to tell mutt to just reply to the address in the To
line (or, perhaps, in the To or Cc line) and not to the sender?
99% of the time
without my having to update my .muttrc to tell it about every
mailing list I might ever subscribe to.
pine doesn't have this function. even in more recent versions, which
have support for rfc 2369 headers, you can't 'list-reply' or
'list-post'. you can, of course, group-reply, but you can do
begin Will Yardley quotation:
how is mutt supposed to know which addresses are mailing lists and which
aren't?
IMHO, if you hit list-reply and Mutt doesn't recognize a list, it
should assume you know what you're talking about, and pop up the To:
address as a yes/no default. Then if you say
Is there a way to tell mutt to just reply to the address in the To
line (or, perhaps, in the To or Cc line) and not to the sender?
how would mutt pick which? it's not psychic.
If a message said:
From: Alice
To: A list
the request is for a command which will initiate a reply to A list
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Apr 16. 2002 15:12]:
Alternately, just do the To:, and ignore the Cc:, because people
shouldn't be Cc:ing lists. But that may just be me.
But they do. A LOT.
--
Mads Martin Jørgensen, http://mmj.dk
Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make
if the recipient is annoyed at getting two copies of the message, they
should just use the one-line procmail/formmail solution to remove duplicate
messages.
How does this delete the personal copy, but not the list copy?
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
How does this delete the personal copy, but not the list copy?
Both messages will have the same Message-ID field in the header.
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Michael Elkins spake thus:
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
How does this delete the personal copy, but not the list copy?
=20
Both messages will have the same
Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Michael Elkins wrote:
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
How does this delete the personal copy, but not the list copy?
Both messages will have the same Message-ID field in the header.
Actually, I think Volker was asking Is it possible to make this
delete the personal
Hi,
I use 'list-hooks' like this:
send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Since I switched to 1.5.0, these things don't fire anymore.
- - - Schnipp - - -
Mutt 1.5.0i (2002-01-22)
Copyright (C) 1996-2001 Michael R. Elkins und andere.
Mutt übernimmt KEINERLEI
11-Apr-02 at 12:21, David Champion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
begin 755 soapbox
I haven't noticed this list to be different from any other in this
regard, except that Sven is rabid about this topic and posts to this
list a lot.
Yeah, agree there. Did Sven catch his rabid attitude from some
There are also some reasons why not to cc: to person when replying to
list. I prefer to receive msgs in list order. Generally, mailing lists
do not have the highest priority in a work day, thus I read/reply when I
have time (like now at 01:20 I should be in bed...). Duplicate removal
removes
. The inherent advantage of a CC: is
that the poster usually gets replies back quicker if directly CCd to him,
since mailing list servers (certainly of big lists) usually have a
delivery lag of a few minutes. At least from where I'm sitting.
I always hit 'L', too. But in fact mailing lists (like
to the person and CC to the list :-)
Not on this list, if I take precedents I have seen from other members to
be the netiquette for this list...
begin 755 soapbox
I haven't noticed this list to be different from any other in this
regard, except that Sven is rabid about this topic and posts
)
Done. Long cc/to list are replaced by
[lines lines deleted]
and I can always see the original header with h command.
% Is there a way to let mutt display only one or two lines of To field? I
% frequently receive emails with several pages of 'To's. Ignoring the To field
Hmmm... You might set
Bo --
...and then Bo Peng said...
%
% Hello,
Hi!
%
% Is there a way to let mutt display only one or two lines of To field? I
% frequently receive emails with several pages of 'To's. Ignoring the To field
Hmmm... You might set up a display filter that prints only the first
N characters of
I am reading http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/mail-to-filter which
is dedicated to this problem. It is hard to ask some new problem. :-)
Bo
% Is there a way to let mutt display only one or two lines of To field? I
% frequently receive emails with several pages of 'To's. Ignoring the
* Dean Richard Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all
First time poster, so please be gentle! :)
I have just upgraded from Outlook 2000 to Mutt.
Using the most recent version and starting mutt via mutt -y to default to the folder
list.
It shows me which folders have new mail
Jerome De Greef ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
* Dean Richard Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have just upgraded from Outlook 2000 to Mutt.
Using the most recent version and starting mutt via mutt -y to
default to the folder list.
It shows me which folders have new mail
* Michael Tatge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Jerome De Greef ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
* Dean Richard Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have just upgraded from Outlook 2000 to Mutt.
Using the most recent version and starting mutt via mutt -y to
default to the folder list
subscription -
but no unsubscriptions. (singing:)
you can check out any time you like -
but you can never leave... hehe
I've tried changing the 'From:' line in mutt
to the old subscription address but the mailing
list manager won't accept it. What can I do?
have you tried sending
Pat --
...and then pat said...
%
% Has traffic disappeared or do I have list problems?? Please cc: me at
% the reply-to address in header.
Things have been hoppingly healthy; I think it's you.
%
% tks
% --
% Pat Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-15-02 07:21] crowed:
Pat --
...and then pat said...
%
% Has traffic disappeared or do I have list problems?? Please cc: me at
% the reply-to address in header.
Things have been hoppingly healthy; I think it's you.
I believe that linuxfreemail.com had
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% Now if you guys would just submit your keys to the public keyservers...
Can you not find mine? I should be fairly widely spread, I think...
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% This one time, at band camp, David T-G wrote:
%
% Do you mean something like
%
%send-hook . set pgp_autosign
...
%
% You rule, David. Works like a friggin' charm.
Why, thank you bows.
:-D
--
David T-G *
Knute --
...and then Knute said...
%
% On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, David T-G wrote:
%
% Do you mean something like
%
%send-hook . set pgp_autosign
...
%
% or so? Modify to folder-hook as you see fit.
% ^^^
% What folder-hook?
The one that he will write to
* Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 13:08]:
Can I set up a keymapping to Reply to the
mailing list, rather than hitting g and
manually pruning the headers where necessary?
*checks manual*
Ahh yes there is. L (list-reply).
Or whatever you map it to
in your muttrcs. Cool.
exactly
This one time, at band camp, David T-G wrote:
Nope; I sign everything except for a few special cases, so I just use
send-hooks, and I just gave him my example and let him convert to folders
on his own. Excercises for the student and all :-)
No need; I sign everything except for two
Has traffic disappeared or do I have list problems?? Please cc: me at
the reply-to address in header.
tks
--
Pat Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535
Registered at: http://counter.li.org
7:36pm up 3:05, 6 users, load
Is there a way to tell Mutt to never PGP-sign messages to a certain
address, but continue to sign them otherwise, other than just remembering
to hit pf before sending?
msg25435/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% Is there a way to tell Mutt to never PGP-sign messages to a certain
% address, but continue to sign them otherwise, other than just remembering
% to hit pf before sending?
Do you mean something like
send-hook . set pgp_autosign
send-hook .
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, David T-G wrote:
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% Is there a way to tell Mutt to never PGP-sign messages to a certain
% address, but continue to sign them otherwise, other than just remembering
% to hit pf before sending?
Do you mean something like
This one time, at band camp, David T-G wrote:
Do you mean something like
send-hook . set pgp_autosign
send-hook . unset pgp_autoencrypt
send-hook (addr1|addr2) unset pgp_autosign
send-hook (addr3) set pgp_autoencrypt
You rule, David. Works like a friggin' charm.
Now if you guys would just submit your keys to the public keyservers...
msg25439/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I configured mutt to automatically delete messages from mailing lists
that are older than 21 days, provided that the message is not flagged
or addressed to me. Here's what I came up with, in case it's useful to
anyone else:
my_hdr From: Philip Mak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# alternate e-mail addresses
the parameters from the
mailboxes-list. Parameters not on this list are silently ignored.
I completed a new version of my patch, now umaliboxes * does work,
and the manual is updated.
I want to thank Cedric Duval, he suggested a way to improve the patch.
You can find the patch on my homepage (see
Kyle, et al --
...and then Kyle Rawlins said...
%
% I want to have two different sets of mailboxes (one for each mailing list) and
As we've seen, there's no official way. I am interested in Nicolas's
patch, though.
Since you've already stated that you consider your mailboxes in two
different
* On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:29:17PM -0500,
* Kyle Rawlins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some way to clear the mailbox list? i.e. the list that is added to by
the 'mailboxes' command.
AFAIK there is no such way. At least in the discussion about this
feature some time ago nobody knew
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:29:17PM -0500,
* Kyle Rawlins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some way to clear the mailbox list? i.e. the list that is added to by
the 'mailboxes' command.
AFAIK there is no such way. At least
Is there some way to clear the mailbox list? i.e. the list that is added to by
the 'mailboxes' command.
I want to have two different sets of mailboxes (one for each mailing list) and
have a keybinding to cycle through them; i.e. a set of work-related mailboxes
and a set of music-related
% However, one thing I have noticed is that when I am viewing my list of
% mailboxes ('c' then 'tab'), there are no 'N' indicators next to mailboxes
% which contain unread mail.
Don't define new as 'contains unread mail', but instead as 'has been
read from since it was last written
Mike, et al --
...and then Mike Schiraldi said...
%
% Don't define new as 'contains unread mail', but instead as 'has been
% read from since it was last written to' and see if your display makes
% sense.
%
% Is there a solution for those of us who -do- want to define new as
% contains
How could you tell that, though?
When i call change-folder, the default is always the next folder which
contains unread messages. I haven't had a chance to look into how it does
it, but i'd imagine it would be really easy to use this preexisting
functionality to look at all mailboxes.
--UfEAyuTBtIjiZzX6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Mike Schiraldi spake thus:
Is there a solution for those of us who -do- want to define new as
contains unread mail? I generally do not care whether a
Mike --
...and then Mike Schiraldi said...
%
% How could you tell that, though?
[that being whether or not there are actually 'N'-flagged messages in a
folder...]
%
% When i call change-folder, the default is always the next folder which
% contains unread messages. I haven't had a chance
-folder key and go to whatever mailbox is the
default. This is great, because the default is always takes me to the next
mailbox containing unread messages. If no mailboxes contain unread messages,
there is no default.
However, sometimes i want to see a list of all mailboxes containing unread
is the
default. This is great, because the default is always takes me to the next
mailbox containing unread messages. If no mailboxes contain unread messages,
there is no default.
However, sometimes i want to see a list of all mailboxes containing unread
messages. But the folder list's %N escape
Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Mike Schiraldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, sometimes i want to see a list of all mailboxes containing
unread messages. But the folder list's %N escape does not show this.
It shows which folders have had new mail placed in them since the
last time i
Look for mark_old in the manual.
I already unset mark_old .. so none of my messages are ever marked
O. They're marked N until i read them.
I should probably wade into the buffy code before this thread gets any
longer.
msg24196/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
however in the file browser, mailboxes with new mail in them don't have
an N next to them.
Okay, it looks like the problem is as follows:
Using maildir (i have no experience with other folder types), when the
folder_format string contains %N, every folder that contains unread mail
will be
Mike, et al --
...and then Mike Schiraldi said...
%
% % it, but i'd imagine it would be really easy to use this preexisting
% % functionality to look at all mailboxes.
%
% It already does :-)
%
% I guess we're talking about different things here. I'll try to be more
% specific:
--8--
...
On Feb 04, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
So tell me a bit about Maildir... When new mail arrives, it is written
to tmp/ and then atomically moved to new/, right? Does it stay in new/
until you read it and it moves to cur/? If that's the usual behavior,
Yes.
when you e'x'it or
Jeremy, et al --
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
%
% On Feb 04, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% So tell me a bit about Maildir... When new mail arrives, it is written
% to tmp/ and then atomically moved to new/, right? Does it stay in new/
% until you read it and it moves to
Greetings,
I'm trying out mutt v. 1.3.27i and am finding it to be quite nice so far.
However, one thing I have noticed is that when I am viewing my list of
mailboxes ('c' then 'tab'), there are no 'N' indicators next to mailboxes
which contain unread mail. Is this a feature that I need to toggle
Peter --
...and then Peter R. Wood - Lists said...
%
% Greetings,
Hello!
%
% I'm trying out mutt v. 1.3.27i and am finding it to be quite nice so far.
Good to hear.
% However, one thing I have noticed is that when I am viewing my list of
% mailboxes ('c' then 'tab'), there are no 'N
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:36:31PM -0500, Peter R. Wood - Lists wrote:
However, one thing I have noticed is that when I am viewing my list of
mailboxes ('c' then 'tab'), there are no 'N' indicators next to mailboxes
I'm not sure, I use version .25, but maybe the default $folder_format
has
Hi Jeremy and others,
http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/mutt.html
is back up after a long hiatus. Sorry, but I was having trouble ssh-ing
to the server, and was too busy to figure it out :-(
Anyway, I will update it as and when something cool turns up. Meanwhile,
do send in links to apps you
% stuff to mutt-users would have a place to go.
%
...
% discussions almost always result directly from discussions that
% originally WERE on-topic, and are unavoidable. Humans have a penchant
Agreed, at least with the first part.
The reason I leave OT conversations on the list is because I have
As Tom Gilbert has it in his sample .muttrc:
set indent_str= # change this and I'll kill you! ;-)
I have have this:
set indent_string=# Dont' be a moron. Leave it as is.
igor
--
Uptime : 31 days, 28 min
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Roman Neuhauser hath spake thusly:
I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send
not possibly hope to legislate
this behavior. Creating new sublists to solve the problem DOES NOT
WORK. EVER.
I should ammend this to make it more accurate: the only time I have
ever SEEN it work is when both lists were moderated, and the moderator
has taken the time to move threads to the other list
I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
stuff to mutt-users would have a place to go.
Yeah, but the problem
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:40:27PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Of course :-)
What about the workaround of sending a probe and waiting to see if that
bounces, perhaps having sent it after a delay?
that would involve intelligence, and something more than majordomo
does at the moment.
Steve
--
... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is quoted text: somewhat different but related:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text:
Agree with you, too. Your post showed one well-tailored. :-)
best,
charlie
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:55:24AM +0100, Volker Moell wrote:
Charles Jie wrote:
I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his
programs.
But please: Don't snip *everything*! Just reading
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Anh Lai wrote:
... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is quoted text: somewhat different but
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 07:46:15AM -0600, Anh Lai wrote:
... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is quoted text: somewhat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys,
Currently I delete all the mail I no longer wish to see in my mailboxes
and it gets sent to ~/Mail/Trash
All well and good.
I'd like somehow to archive my list mail rather than dump it with all
the other rubbish to make it easier
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:27:47 -0800
From: J. Scott Dorr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Anh Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette
snip what=OTBS /
Nah. :) He coulda just highlighted the appropriate lines (via shift-v or some
such) then ':s
Nick Wilson wrote:
I'd like somehow to archive my list mail rather than dump it with all
the other rubbish to make it easier to search through.
Just wondered how you good people did this?
if you have the Trash patch applied, you can do something like this:
folder-hook . set
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 18:52
* Will Yardley said
Nick Wilson wrote:
I'd like somehow to archive my list mail rather than dump it with all
the other rubbish to make it easier to search through.
Just wondered how you good people did
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:37:52PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
stuff to mutt-users
on the suse-linux-e list as well. One of the
list users now hosts an OT suse-list and it has helped keep the off
topic posts off the main list.
Regards,
Dallam
--
Dallam Wych [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024: A89A2371 Ipsa scientia potestas est
2717 4EB8 461D 743B 47CF Registered Linux
Alas! Roman Neuhauser spake thus:
I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
stuff to mutt-users would have a place to go.
I
901 - 1000 of 1389 matches
Mail list logo
