2012/03/01 19:56 -0800, Don Wieland
I do not get the same results. Am I missing something? Hopefully
something simple ;-)
O, you are. You do not want GROUP_CONCAT in the subquery. It gives you the
comma-separated string whereto you referred, which, as far as the IN goes, is
o
Appreciate a little guidance here:
Background: I have an invoicing system. Invoices are generated and
(invoice and Invoice Items) and Payments are generated (Payments and
Payment Items). Payment items are amount of the Payment Total
allocated to payoff open invoices. So I may have 3 open in
- Original Message -
> From: "Adarsh Sharma"
>
> Please check the attachment for the script & output.
Thanks for your password :-)
> Now I just want to mail the output of my script to some persons
> e-mail-ID
Assuming you run this from crontab, just set MAILTO=per...@domain.ext right
Dear all,
I have prepared a simple script that shows the database, tables size in
the Database server as :-
Please check the attachment for the script & output.
Now I just want to mail the output of my script to some persons e-mail-ID
Also, I want to do some calculations and provide the info
r
>
> > -
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > >From: Victor Subervi
> > >Sent: Aug 24, 2010 1:14 PM
> > >To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
> > >Subject: Complex Select Query
> > >
> > >Hi;
> > >I have the
ice.
TIA.
Victor
> -
>
> -Original Message-
> >From: Victor Subervi
> >Sent: Aug 24, 2010 1:14 PM
> >To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
> >Subject: Complex Select Query
> >
> >Hi;
> >I have the following query:
> >
> >select * from spr
It's a tree. See
http://www.artfulsoftware.com/mysqlbook/sampler/mysqled1ch20.html and
http://www.artfulsoftware.com/infotree/treequeryperformance.pdf.
PB
-
-Original Message-
>From: Victor Subervi
>Sent: Aug 24, 2010 1:14 PM
>To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
>Subject: C
Hi;
I have the following query:
select * from spreadsheets s join products p on p.Item=s.Item join
categories c on p.Category=c.ID where s.Client=%s order by p.category,
c.parent;
mysql> describe products;
+-+--+--+-+-++
| Field | Type
ID FROM Table2 WHERE Source2_Name = 'name'
UNION
SELECT Main_ID FROM Table3 WHERE Source3_Name = 'name'
-Original Message-
From: João Cândido de Souza Neto [mailto:j...@consultorweb.cnt.br]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 1:09 PM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re:
¢ndido de Souza Neto [mailto:j...@consultorweb.cnt.br]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 1:09 PM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: SELECT query question
select
*
from
MainTable MT
left join Table1 T1 on MT.Main_ID = T1.MainID
left join Table2 T2 on MT.Main_ID = T2.MainID
left join Table
select
*
from
MainTable MT
left join Table1 T1 on MT.Main_ID = T1.MainID
left join Table2 T2 on MT.Main_ID = T2.MainID
left join Table3 T3 on MT.Main_ID = T3.MainID
where
T1.Source1_Name = "anything" or
T2.Source2_Name = "anything" or
T3.Source3_Name = "anything"
Not tested.
-
Hello.
I have 4 tables:
MainTable (Main_ID, Main_Name)
Table1 (Source1_ID, Source1_Name, Main_ID)
Table2 (Source2_ID, Source2_Name, Main_ID)
Table3 (Source3_ID, Source3_Name, Main_ID)
And a search box.
A user can type any names from Source1_Name or Source2_Name or
Source3_Name.
I need to get Ma
yes,it is more faster that i select every cols except the TEXT col,but
unfortunately i need the TEXT cols for next step.
2009/7/14 Johnny Withers
> It looks like MySQL is using both columns in the key for that query, since
> the key_len is 8, but for some reason it says it is still "using where"
It looks like MySQL is using both columns in the key for that query, since
the key_len is 8, but for some reason it says it is still "using where".
What happens when you only select these fields: seq_id, ref_id,
start_position, end_position?
Does the query speed up? I had a table that had some TE
sorry for my careless,the sql should be select * from REF_SEQ where REF_ID =
3 and START_POSITION between 3 and 803;
the explain output is :
mysql> explain select * from REF_SEQ where REF_ID = 3 and START_POSITION
between 3 and 803;
++-+-+---+
I see that index_ref_start is defined on Ref_Id and Start_Position. Mysql
only uses the left-most column of this index. Drop and re-add this key only
defined as
INDEX idx_ref_start(start_position)
and see if that helps.
Your explain you sent this time is not even using the index.
In your previo
the REF_SEQ is defined below, the col DNA_SEQ is a string such as
"ATGCGGTTA",
| REF_SEQ | CREATE TABLE `REF_SEQ` (
`SEQ_ID` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
`REF_ID` int(11) NOT NULL,
`START_POSITION` int(11) NOT NULL,
`END_POSITION` int(11) NOT NULL,
`DNA_SEQ` text,
`DNA_QUALITY` tex
Can you show the CREATE TABLE for your REF_SEQ table?
The explain output says "using where" which means that MySQL will have to
post-filter rows after the storage engine retrieves them. It also means the
query may benefit from different/better indexing.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, TianJing
i do not use text for start_postion,i use int for it. the only col which
defined to text is characters such as "ABTGDSDFSGFDG" etc.
2009/7/13 Darryle Steplight
> Numeric indexing is a lot faster. You definitely shouldn't use text or
> varchar types as column types for you min and max values. Do
Numeric indexing is a lot faster. You definitely shouldn't use text or
varchar types as column types for you min and max values. Do an ALTER
TABLE on any column only hold numeric values and switch them to int
or mediumint.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:36 AM, TianJing wrote:
> sorry fo that, but i
sorry fo that, but i really need all cols in the table, i think the problem
maybe caused by one of the col which is text type, each record of this col
has 2000 characters. this makes the size of record more biger.
2009/7/13 Darryle Steplight
> You are still doing SELECT * . Do you really need to
You are still doing SELECT * . Do you really need to return all of the
columns in that table or just COL1, COL2, COL5 for example. Only grab
the columns you are actually going to use.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:23 AM, TianJing wrote:
> thanks for reply,
>
> i hava an index on the start_position,th
thanks for reply,
i hava an index on the start_position,the min_postion and the max_postion is
constant value, the output of the query is:
explain select * from REF_SEQ where START_POSITION between 3 and
803;
++-+-+---+-+-+
1. Don't use SELECT *. Only grab the cols that you only need. Also
make sure you have an index on min_position and max_position. After
that if your query isn't faster please show us the output of running
EXPLAIN select * from table_name where start_postion between
min_postion and
max_postion" .
Hi all,
i use "select * from table_name where start_postion between min_postion and
max_postion" to select all the record in the ranges,
when the ranges is very large,such as 800(about 1000 record in it), the
query is so slow,
when i use mysql administrator i find that traffic is higher when
Can u tell me , assume if i use If in the query , then i reduce performance
,
Any idea
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Janek Bogucki
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> mysql> create table t(i int);
>
> mysql> insert into t values(1),(2),(3);
>
> mysql> select i, if(i <= 1, 'low', 'high') from t order by i;
> +--
Hi,
mysql> create table t(i int);
mysql> insert into t values(1),(2),(3);
mysql> select i, if(i <= 1, 'low', 'high') from t order by i;
+--+---+
| i| if(i <= 1, 'low', 'high') |
+--+---+
|1 | low |
|2 | hig
Hi all ,
Can u give one example query ,
Which contain the IF condition ,
Because here before am not used the IF and all ,
Thanks
--
உங்கள் நண்பன்
பரணி குமார்
Regards
B.S.Bharanikumar
POST YOUR OPINION
http://bharanikumariyerphp.site88.net/bharanikumar/
problem disappeared and the
selects behave as one would expect.
Many thanks to all who offered advice.
Carl
- Original Message -
From: "Perrin Harkins"
To: "Carl"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: Select query locks tables in Innodb
2009/3/
categories c ON a.assetcategoryID = c.assetcategoryID
WHERE m.assetID IS NULL
ORDER BY a.assetID
Cheers
- Original Message -
From: "Bonnett, John"
To: ;
Cc: ;
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 10:59 PM
Subject: RE: Negated SELECT query
SELECT Employees.*
FROM Employees
@lists.mysql.com
Cc: wi...@lists.mysql.com; mysql-h...@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Negated SELECT query
3 tables are related by one-many links.
Employees ---<- Assets ---<- Maintenance
Employees can be assigned => 0 Assets
Assets can have => 0 occurances of Maintenance.
Assets ta
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:42 PM, BobSharp wrote:
> These have been written successfully with Sub-Queries,
> I would like to know how they can be done with only JOINs ?
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/rewriting-subqueries.html
- Perrin
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: ht
3 tables are related by one-many links.
Employees ---<- Assets ---<- Maintenance
Employees can be assigned => 0 Assets
Assets can have => 0 occurances of Maintenance.
Assets table contains EmployeeIDs and MaintenanceIDs,
but no Foreign Key contraints.
Queries ...
1) which Employee
version concurrency doesn't necessarily mean the older versions
that are being read from have to be entirely in memory.
> InnoDB will lock on a query that doesn't use an index.
It shouldn't lock on a SELECT query, regardless of the indexes involved.
- Perrin
--
MySQL General
's suggestions also.
>
> Carl
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "Brent Baisley"
> To: "Carl"
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Select query locks tables in Innodb
>
>
> Ok, so you have 687 unique or
elp and Baron's suggestions also.
Carl
- Original Message -
From: "Brent Baisley"
To: "Carl"
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: Select query locks tables in Innodb
Ok, so you have 687 unique organization serial numbers. That's not
ver
on Schwartz"
To: "Carl"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: Select query locks tables in Innodb
I don't think it locks the tables. The behavior may be similar, but I
seriously doubt that's what's happening. Take a snapshot of SHOW
INNODB STAT
gt; Since the report query is only reading data, I am puzzled why it locks the
> tables. Any ideas?
>
> TIA,
>
> Carl
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "Baron Schwartz"
> To: "Carl"
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:29 PM
> Subject: Re:
--
From: "Baron Schwartz"
To: "Carl"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: Select query locks tables in Innodb
Carl,
Locked status in SHOW PROCESSLIST and a table being locked are
different. There is a bug in MySQL that shows Locked status for
queries
Carl,
Locked status in SHOW PROCESSLIST and a table being locked are
different. There is a bug in MySQL that shows Locked status for
queries accessing InnoDB tables in some cases. What version of MySQL
are you using?
The table is not really locked, you're just seeing that as a side
effect of wh
Carl,
Locked status in SHOW PROCESSLIST and a table being locked are
different. There is a bug in MySQL that shows Locked status for
queries accessing InnoDB tables in some cases. What version of MySQL
are you using?
The table is not really locked, you're just seeing that as a side
effect of wh
the isolation level but I believe it is whatever was set out of
the box (five years ago.)
Thanks,
Carl
- Original Message -
From: "Perrin Harkins"
To: "Carl"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: Select query locks tables in Innodb
2009
One more note.
Perrin asked if I was using any select... for update. The answer is no,
neither in the select query that seems to be locking the tables nor in the
queries that are processing transactions.
Surprisingly, one of the tables that reports being locked is never accessed
in the
2009/3/4 Carl :
> However, when I had all the pieces in the query
> (copy attached), I could easily see it was locking tables using the Server
> Monitor in Navicat.
I don't know what that is, but I think you'd better look at something
closer to the bone, like SHOW INNODB STATUS.
> Explain (copy a
Message -
From: "Baron Schwartz"
To: "Brent Baisley"
Cc: "Carl" ;
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: Select query locks tables in Innodb
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Brent Baisley
wrote:
A SELECT will/can lock a table. It almost al
om: "Baron Schwartz"
To: "Brent Baisley"
Cc: "Carl" ;
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: Select query locks tables in Innodb
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Brent Baisley
wrote:
A SELECT will/can lock a table. It almost always does in MyISAM (no
inse
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Brent Baisley wrote:
> A SELECT will/can lock a table. It almost always does in MyISAM (no
> insert/updates), almost never does in InnoDB. There is an exception to
> every rule. The problem is most likely in the 107488 rows part of the
> query. That's too many rows
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Carl wrote:
> A query that is selecting data for a report locks the files that it accesses
> forcing users who are attempting to enter transactions to wait until the
> select query is finished.
Is it an INSERT INTO...SELECT FROM? Those lock. Also,
ho are attempting to enter transactions to wait until the
> select query is finished.
>
> The query is sizable so I have not included it here (I can if that would be
> helpful.) Explain shows (abbreviated):
>
> id select_type table type possible
attempting to enter transactions to wait until the select
query is finished.
The query is sizable so I have not included it here (I can if that would be
helpful.) Explain shows (abbreviated):
id select_typetabletypepossible keys
key_len
gt; ');
>>
>>
>> -
>> Now,
>>
>> select * db_users where db_id=(SELECT id FROM data_bases where
>> dom_id=(SELECT id FROM domains where name='abc.com'));
>>
>> Please correct me the syn
(SELECT id FROM domains where name='abc.com
> ');
>
>
> -
> Now,
>
> select * db_users where db_id=(SELECT id FROM data_bases where
> dom_id=(SELECT id FROM domains where name='abc.com'));
>
> Please correct me the
-
> Now,
>
> select * db_users where db_id=(SELECT id FROM data_bases where
> dom_id=(SELECT id FROM domains where name='abc.com'));
>
> Please correct me the syntax for the above command. I am trying to use the
> result of one select query as a query string on another.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
e='abc.com
');
-
Now,
select * db_users where db_id=(SELECT id FROM data_bases where
dom_id=(SELECT id FROM domains where name='abc.com'));
Please correct me the syntax for the above command. I am trying to use the
result of one select query as a query string on another.
Thanks
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Velen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to know when doing a select query how is it executed :
>
>
> If there is 1000 records with price<10, 3000 records with flag='Y' and the
> table contains 200,000 records.
&
is,
>
> Insert Into `inventory` (Item, Qty)
> Values
> ('Apples',5),
> ('Bananas',4),
> ('Cherries',6),
> ('Apples',-1),
> ('Bananas',1),
> ('Cherries',-2),
> ('Apples',3),
> ('Bananas
Bananas',1),
('Cherries',-2),
('Apples',3),
('Bananas',-7),
('Cherries',19),
('Apples',-5),
('Bananas',88),
('Cherries',6);
Insert Into `request` (Required, Qty)
Values
('Apples', 12),
('Bananas', 112),
('
erries',-2),
('Apples',3),
('Bananas',-7),
('Cherries',19),
('Apples',-5),
('Bananas',88),
('Cherries',6);
Insert Into `request` (Required, Qty)
Values
('Apples', 12),
('Bananas', 112),
('Cherries', 5);
N
8/9/07, Andrew Armstrong < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > It goes to a temporary table when MySQL does not have enough
> memory
> > > > > (allocated) to store the temporary results in memory, so it needs
> to
> > >
t; [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It goes to a temporary table when MySQL does not have enough memory
> > > > (allocated) to store the temporary results in memory, so it needs to
> > > > create
> > > > a temporary table on
store the temporary results in memory, so it needs to
> > > create
> > > a temporary table on disk.
> > >
> > > Try increasing the memory buffer size or eliminating more rows from
> > the
> > > query.
> > >
> > > -Original M
y table on disk.
> >
> > Try increasing the memory buffer size or eliminating more rows from the
> > query.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mike Zupan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, 10 August 2007 4:52 AM
> > To: mysql@lists.m
sk.
>
> Try increasing the memory buffer size or eliminating more rows from the
> query.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Zupan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 10 August 2007 4:52 AM
> To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
> Subject: remove temporary table from SE
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 10 August 2007 4:52 AM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: remove temporary table from SELECT query
I have been pulling my hair out over a temporary table being created in the
following query
SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS entryid,title FROM
I have been pulling my hair out over a temporary table being created in the
following query
SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS entryid,title FROM
friends_test INNER JOIN entries ON friendLink=userid AND userLink=2 order by
entryid
if I change userLink=2 to friendLink=2 it is fine and its ver
> select distinct
> TraderPersonalInfo.TraderID,PM2.PlatformID,PM4.PlatformID
> from TraderPersonalInfo,Locations,Platforms PF2,Platforms PF4,
> PlatformMap PM2,PlatformMap PM4
> where (TraderPersonalInfo.TraderID = PM2.TraderID)
> and (PM2.PlatformID = PF2.PlatformID)
> and PM2.PlatformID = 2
Detected
Subject: struggling with select query
Guys,
Below is a select query which I'm stuggling with, so I'd be grateful for any
help you could give me.
select distinct TraderPersonalInfo.TraderID,PlatformMap.PlatformID from
TraderPersonalInfo,Locations,PlatformMap,Platforms where
(T
Guys,
Below is a select query which I'm stuggling with, so I'd be grateful for any
help you could give me.
select distinct TraderPersonalInfo.TraderID,PlatformMap.PlatformID from
TraderPersonalInfo,Locations,PlatformMap,Platforms where
(TraderPersonalInfo.TraderID = PlatformMap.Tra
Thank you Guys, your answer helpful to me.
select * from table1 order by field1 limit 10,1
Dusan
balaraju mandala napsal(a):
Hi All,
I need a select query, with which i can reach to a particular row
directly.
I mean if a table have 100 rows inserted,
we can use select * from table1 limit 10;
with this query i will have 10 rows
Hi All,
I need a select query, with which i can reach to a particular row directly.
I mean if a table have 100 rows inserted,
we can use select * from table1 limit 10;
with this query i will have 10 rows, but my requirement is only 10th
row only should come as a result. If u have any solution
Barry wrote:
Nenad Bosanac schrieb:
Hi I have one problem that i can`t resolve.
still need advice or is it solved?
IF!!! you need IF!! :)
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ratheesh K J wrote:
Hello All,
I run a select query to see its speed. It took around 5 seconds. Now i run the
same query simultaneously twice usng two instances of the client tool. It took
10 seconds for both the queris to complete. Its not 5 secs + 5 secs. Both the
queries were running
On Monday 24 July 2006 09:06, Duncan Hill wrote:
> On Monday 24 July 2006 09:05, Ratheesh K J wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I run a select query to see its speed. It took around 5 seconds. Now i
> > run the same query simultaneously twice usng two instances of the
On Monday 24 July 2006 09:05, Ratheesh K J wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I run a select query to see its speed. It took around 5 seconds. Now i run
> the same query simultaneously twice usng two instances of the client tool.
> It took 10 seconds for both the queris to complete. Its not 5
Hello All,
I run a select query to see its speed. It took around 5 seconds. Now i run the
same query simultaneously twice usng two instances of the client tool. It took
10 seconds for both the queris to complete. Its not 5 secs + 5 secs. Both the
queries were running till 10 secs when i saw
006 10:18 AM
> To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
> Subject: Invalid syntax with STD() function when more than one field is
> used in select query
>
> Hello,
>
> I am encountering a strange issue when using the STD function. On my
> local development machine (MYSQL version 4.18-nt
Hello,
I am encountering a strange issue when using the STD function. On my local
development machine (MYSQL version 4.18-nt) I can run the following basic
SELECT query with no problems:
SELECT STD(`LAPSETIME`),UKEY FROM 4b3f91f64a19529a84dff4982c8a6bc5 GROUP BY
UKEY
When I test this query on
Nenad Bosanac schrieb:
Hi
I have one problem that i can`t resolve.
still need advice or is it solved?
--
Smileys rule (cX.x)C --o(^_^o)
Dance for me! ^(^_^)o (o^_^)o o(^_^)^ o(^_^o)
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.
, 4, 4, 1
1, 1, 18, 4, 4, 2
2, 1, 21, 6, 3, 2
2, 1, 21, 6, 3, 3
3, 1, 22, 5, 1, 2
3, 1, 22, 5, 1, 1
3, 1, 22, 5, 1, 3
4, 3, 23, 6, 3, 1
4, 3, 23, 6, 3, 2
4, 3, 23, 6, 3, 3
and table referent looks like
ReferentID SifraReferenta ImeReferenta
PrezimeReferenta
1, '01', 'Nada
No problem, glad to help.
I noticed your comment in an earlier message about it seeming like a
workaround - I don't think it seems like a workaround at all.
Having a table with the possible values makes for a normal database
structure, and an approach that should keep you from having to modif
Thank you Dan,
[...]
> Otherwise it's just not possible to show
> what's not there - in your case, think of this: how would MySQL know to
> show 5 when there are no 5's, but not also show the count for every
> other integer that's not there? (6, 7, 8, .. 1048576, 1048577, etc.)
[...]
Sure, easy
;t it?
If so, you can try this:
SELECT COUNT(id)
FROM contract
GROUP BY level
- Original Message -
From: "Jay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 5:41 PM
Subject: SELECT Query GROUP BY
Hello MySQL Users
I have a contract table. Each contract has
ROM contract
> GROUP BY level
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 5:41 PM
> Subject: SELECT Query GROUP BY
>
>
>> Hello MySQL Users
>>
>> I have a contract table. Each c
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 5:41 PM
Subject: SELECT Query GROUP BY
> Hello MySQL Users
>
> I have a contract table. Each contract has a certain level, which can be
> in a range from 1-5. This information is stored as a number. There is no
> additional table for the levels.
>
Hello MySQL Users
I have a contract table. Each contract has a certain level, which can be
in a range from 1-5. This information is stored as a number. There is no
additional table for the levels.
I would like to get a list with the amount of contracts of each level -
including 0 for the levels w
Nanu Kalmanovitz wrote:
Hi!
System is Novell SBS 6.5 sp1 with Apache 2.0.48, MySQL ver. 4.0.15a,
PHP 4.2.3.
We try to define a select query that takes the values of the variables
'varKoshi' and 'varKvish' based on the following 4 tables:
'varKoshi' >>&
Hi!
System is Novell SBS 6.5 sp1 with Apache 2.0.48, MySQL ver. 4.0.15a,
PHP 4.2.3.
We try to define a select query that takes the values of the variables
'varKoshi' and 'varKvish' based on the following 4 tables:
'varKoshi' >>&
method of
forcing the output to be in a specific order.
--
Rhino
- Original Message -
From: "subramani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 10:22 AM
Subject: A doubt in SELECT query
hello all,
In which order the datas are displayed, when the SEL
subramani wrote:
hello all,
In which order the datas are displayed, when the SELECT quey is used ?
Is it random or the order in which the datas are inserted?
-- r.subramani
My log file: http://subramanitce.blogspot.com
Random
--
Smileys rule (cX.x)C --o(^_^o)
Dance for me! ^(^_^)o (o^_^)o o(
hello all,
In which order the datas are displayed, when the SELECT quey is used ?
Is it random or the order in which the datas are inserted?
-- r.subramani
My log file: http://subramanitce.blogspot.com
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:
try something like this
select customer,max(time),name
from customers join projects on projects.parent_id=customer.id
group by customer;
regards
Pure Web Solution
http://www.purewebsolution.co.uk
PHP, MYSQL, Web Design & Web Services
Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gabriel PREDA wrote:
> >
|06|03 |My small Project|2005-02-10|
|07|03 |My big Project! |2005-06-11|
Small mistake. The project with ID 06 should have a date above ID 07.
Sorry for that!
--
Smileys rule (cX.x)C --o(^_^o)
Dance for me! ^(^_^)o (o^_^)o o(^_^)^ o(^_^o)
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For li
Gabriel PREDA wrote:
About the first problem I think you need to give us more data !
Okay i thought yesterday how i can make up some real problem and have this:
Guess you have a database with customers and a database with projects.
Those prijects have timestamps so you know what time he added
Barry,
Hello Everyone!
Probably somone can help me out.
I have 2 databases and it looks like:
(Wayne Ratliff is dead but his mistake lives on :-) ). You mean tables,
right?
db1 Project 1
db2 Subproject 1
db2 Subproject 2
db1 Project 2
db2 Subproject 1
db1 Project 3
db2 Subproject 1
About the first problem I think you need to give us more data !
As for the seccond... I haven't sen such loops yet...
But you can go arround them and do something like:
SELECT * FROM db WHERE (id BETWEEN 5 AND 50) AND id%5=0
--
Gabriel PREDA
Senior Web Developer
Hello Everyone!
Probably somone can help me out.
I have 2 databases and it looks like:
db1 Project 1
db2 Subproject 1
db2 Subproject 2
db1 Project 2
db2 Subproject 1
db1 Project 3
db2 Subproject 1
db2 Subproject 2
db2 Subproject 3
What kind of a query would give me the first Subproj
Yesmin Patwary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/22/2006 09:56:20 AM:
> Dear All,
>
> First of all, I would like to thank Shawn Green, Peter Brawley and
> Josh for their kind help in my previous issue.
>
> I have a table named master_list with two field customer_id and
> list_code. I need to
Dear All,
First of all, I would like to thank Shawn Green, Peter Brawley and Josh for
their kind help in my previous issue.
I have a table named master_list with two field customer_id and list_code. I
need to insert only non existent records in master_list from a child_list. Both
ma
: Jay Paulson (CE CEN); Gleb Paharenko;
mysql@lists.mysql.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Help
with a SELECT query
[1] The reasoning behind this: Is it relevant for a 5.0 user to know
that INET_ATON() was introduced in 3.23.15? We don't think it is,
and many users had complained that th
1 - 100 of 327 matches
Mail list logo
