One of the things that _no_one_ should be concerned about any longer is
compatibility with MS Office.
This is absolutely impossible for me. I exchange so many files
(spreadsheet, doc and presentation) with so many customers and other
staff members that unfortunately Office has become the
On Saturday 05 January 2002 12:56am, you wrote:
One of the things that _no_one_ should be concerned about any longer is
compatibility with MS Office.
This is absolutely impossible for me. I exchange so many files
(spreadsheet, doc and presentation) with so many customers and other
Sevatio wrote:
On Saturday 05 January 2002 12:56am, you wrote:
One of the things that _no_one_ should be concerned about any longer is
compatibility with MS Office.
This is absolutely impossible for me. I exchange so many files
(spreadsheet, doc and presentation) with so many
On Tuesday 01 January 2002 01:38, you wrote:
On 31 Dec 2001 20:05:55 -0500, Michael Leone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Civileme's point was that if/when the UCITA law passes in
Washington, USA, then Microsoft (headquartered in Washington) will be
able to make a minor change to their
On Tue, 2002-01-01 at 08:51, robin wrote:
Dave Sherman wrote:
[cut]
I think Civileme's point was that if/when the UCITA law passes in
Washington, USA, then Microsoft (headquartered in Washington) will be
able to make a minor change to their proprietary .doc/.xls/whatever file
formats,
Dave Sherman wrote:
I agree that we need the filters for now, but it would still be wise to
stop using MS' proprietary formats ASAP. As far as using LaTeX, is there
a free and easy to use LaTeX editor/word processor for Windows and
Macintosh? Just curious -- actually, I thought LaTeX was a
Dave Sherman wrote:
On Tue, 2002-01-01 at 08:51, robin wrote:
Dave Sherman wrote:
[cut]
I think Civileme's point was that if/when the UCITA law passes in
Washington, USA, then Microsoft (headquartered in Washington) will be
able to make a minor change to their proprietary .doc/.xls/whatever
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 09:12:25 -0500
Ed Tharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
On Tuesday 01 January 2002 01:38, you wrote:
On 31 Dec 2001 20:05:55 -0500, Michael Leone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: I think Civileme's point was that if/when the UCITA law
passes in
On Tuesday 01 January 2002 19:23, you wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 09:12:25 -0500
Ed Tharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
On Tuesday 01 January 2002 01:38, you wrote:
On 31 Dec 2001 20:05:55 -0500, Michael Leone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: I think Civileme's point
On Sun, 2001-12-30 at 17:52, Doug Lerner wrote:
I wouldn't mind doing that myself, and encouraging our company to do
that. I have no particular love for Microsoft proprietary products. But I
can't force our customers to change. As we say here in Japan, the
customer is God. If the client wants
I think Civileme's point was that if/when the UCITA law passes in
Washington, USA, then Microsoft (headquartered in Washington) will be
able to make a minor change to their proprietary .doc/.xls/whatever
file formats, and it will be illegal for Sun or anyone else to
reverse-engineer that file
Michael Leone wrote:
I think Civileme's point was that if/when the UCITA law passes in
Washington, USA, then Microsoft (headquartered in Washington) will be
able to make a minor change to their proprietary .doc/.xls/whatever
file formats, and it will be illegal for Sun or anyone else to
On 31 Dec 2001 20:05:55 -0500, Michael Leone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Civileme's point was that if/when the UCITA law passes in
Washington, USA, then Microsoft (headquartered in Washington) will be
able to make a minor change to their proprietary .doc/.xls/whatever
file formats, and
On Sat, 2001-12-29 at 20:32, daRcmaTTeR wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 09:17:59 +0900
Doug Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sunday, December 30, 2001):
One of the things that _no_one_ should be concerned about any longer is
On 30 Dec 2001 09:27:29 -0600
Dave Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
On Sat, 2001-12-29 at 20:32, daRcmaTTeR wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 09:17:59 +0900
Doug Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 01:28:01 -0500
Maureen L. Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled gleefully:
I upgraded to KDE 2.2 and am using K-Office. So far it hasn't crashed
or froze on me and I have imported all the documents I was using from
Lotus SmartSuite and it hasn't lost
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 09:17:59 +0900
Doug Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sunday, December 30, 2001):
One of the things that _no_one_ should be concerned about any longer is
compatibility with MS Office.
This is absolutely
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 01:28:01 -0500
Maureen L. Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled gleefully:
I upgraded to KDE 2.2 and am using K-Office. So far it hasn't crashed
or froze on me and I have imported all the documents I was using from
Lotus SmartSuite and it hasn't lost a thing. I am very
I upgraded to KDE 2.2 and am using K-Office. So far it hasn't crashed
or froze on me and I have imported all the documents I was using from
Lotus SmartSuite and it hasn't lost a thing. I am very pleased with
it. Some small improvements in K-Spread are needed, like multi copy,
but otherwise it
Maureen L. Thomas wrote:
I upgraded to KDE 2.2 and am using K-Office. So far it hasn't crashed
or froze on me and I have imported all the documents I was using from
Lotus SmartSuite and it hasn't lost a thing. I am very pleased with
it. Some small improvements in K-Spread are needed, like
20 matches
Mail list logo
